Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
Effect of Integrated nutrient management on Plant growth, Flower yield
and Quality of Dahlia (Dahlia variabilis) c.v Kenya White.
Submitted to:
Chairman :
Advisor :
Prof. P.W.Ramteke.
Pro.(Dr.) Dr. S. Saravanan.
Co-Advisor
Members
Dr. J.P.Collis.
Prof.(Dr.) V.M.Prasad
Submitted by:
Shivkumar M. Wararkar
12MSHFCO11
M.Sc ( Horti.)
Floriculture & Landscaping
Department of Horticulture
Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences
(Formerly Allahabad Agriculture Institute)
Deemed-To-Be-UniversityAllahabad-211007 (U.P.)
INTRODUCTION
Dahlias prefer rich, fertile, moist and well- drained soil with pH 6.5 in areas with
heavy or clay type soil, use well- rotten manure or suitable organic matter and
sand in equal quantities to make it ideal for planting.Dahlia grows better in high
organic residues.
Leaf mold, compost or FYM can also be used for good results. Dahlia like other
plants needs NPK in large amounts and other elements like Fe, Zn, Cu, and Cl in
small quantities.
Nutrition is an important factor which is directly related to growth and flowering
of dahlia. Many experiments regarding fertilizer applications has been conducted
in different parts of the world to improve the growth and flowering of dahlia.
The size of plant, tuber corms weight, number of flowers and growth was
increased significantly with increasing rates of N and P 2O Present study was
therefore, investigated to observe the influence of different combination .e., N,
P2O5 SSP and FYM on the growth and flowering of dahlia which ultimately
improve the production of cut flower as well as tuber.
and develop interest of growers to cultivate Dahlia for making high return.( M.
Ahmed, et al. 2004).
Poultry manure contributes to the nation annually 0.3, 0.26, and 0.14 million
tones of N, P2O5 SSP and K2O MOP, respectively.
Apart from this, it also contain 60 to 100 ppm Zn and 380 to 1450 ppm Fe
(Garg, et al., 1971). Due to its rapid mineralization, poultry manure has been
recognized as a valuable source of plant nutrients for crops.
In this organic manure, 60 percent of the nitrogen is present as uric acid and
remaining 40 per cent as stable organic nitrogen (Srivastava, 1988)..
1.
2.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Singh and Gupta(1995) studied the effect of N. And P2O5.on tuber production
and growth in Dahlia variabiliswild cultivar Powder puff. The size of plant, bulb
weight, number of Flowers and growth was increased significantly with increasing
rates of N and P2O5.
Singh et al. (1996) noticed in sunflower maximum plant height (151.4 cm) when
nitrogen was applied at 40 kg per hectare compared to control (139.2 cm).
(21.26Cm) and plant spread (34.67 cm) with the application of nitrogen at 40 g per square
meter Compared to control (18.73 cm and 29.16 cm, respectively) in pansy.
Khan etAl.(1999) found that the high balanced levels of fertilizers had positive effects on plant
height and also high dose of fertilizers has direct relation with lateral buds and number of
branches.
Shivakumar (2000) recorded with the application of 315: 84: 84 kg NPK per hectare took
maximum days for initiation of bud (36.60 days) and days to 50 per cent flowering (47.60Days)
compared to dose of 225: 60: 60 kg NPK per hectare (32.80 days and 45.20 days, respectively)
in marigold.
Singh and Sangama (2000) noticed more number of flowers (35.22) per plant with the
application of nitrogen at 300 kg per hectare compared to application of nitrogen at 100 kg per
Hectare (21.27) in China Aster.
Acharya and Dashora (2004) reported that application of 200 kg per ha each of
nitrogen and phosphorus produced maximum plant height (95.92 cm), plant spread
(49.31Cm) and branches (14.2) when compared to other levels of nitrogen,
phosphorus and control In African marigold. Similarly, Saud and Ramachandra
(2004) reported that higher dose of fertilizer (150:150:150 kg NPK/ha) resulted in
maximum number of primary and secondary branches in French marigold.
Karuppaiah and Krishna (2005) revealed that nitrogen application at 450 kg per
hectare had hectare had taken more number of days to 50 per cent flowering (81.30
days) over control (70.86 days) in French marigold.
pandey and mishra (2005) noticed that application of 20:20:20 gm N:P:K per
square meter gave more number of flower (75.84) per plant , flower yield (754gm)
per plant compared to control (47.19g, 306g and 11.08g respectively) in African
marigold cv. PusaNarangiGainda.
Jenny Marks et al., (2006) reported that application of 150 : 75 : 75 kg N:P:K per
ha in ajowan recorded the highest plant height and number of primary branches per
plant compared to application Of 100 : 50 : 50 kg NPK per ha (71.43 cm and
16.08cm, respectively).
Dahlia seedlings
Cultivar Kenya White of Dahlia was used for research work
Urea
Urea consist of 46% Nitrogen
FYM
FYM consists 0.5% N, 0.2%P, 0.5% K
POULTRY MANURE
Poultry manure consists 3.03% N, 2.63% P, 1.4% K
VERMICOMPOST
Vermicompost consists N 1.5-2.0 %, P 0.9-1.7 % and K 1.5-2.5 %
BIO-FERTILIZER
Azotobacter is a non-symbiotic N-fixing bacterium. Azotobacter fixes the
atmospheric nitrogen when inoculated to plants, which help to save the application of N
fertilizers to an extent of 20-25 per cent. Azotobactor applied as soil application, mixing
in FYM.
DETAILS OF LAYOUT
Dahlia
Botanical name
Kenya White
Dahliavariabilis L. var.
Family
Design of experiment
(R.B.D)
No. Of treatments
11
No. of replication
03
compositae
Randomised Block Design
33
Spacing
0.45m X 0.45m
1m x 1.5m
1.5m2
0.80m
0.50m
Width of bund
0.30m
16.1m
7m
112.7m2
Total no of plant/plot
06
198
TREATMENT DETAILS
S.
Symbols
No.
1
T0
T1
9:9:6.75 gm NPK/Plot+Azospirullum
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gmNPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
T6
24:16.5:10.5gmgm NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
10
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
OBSERVATIONS RECORDED
(A).Growth parameters
1. Plant height (cm)
2. Plant spread (cm)
3. Number of branches per
plant
4. Number of leaves per plant
C(C).Yield parameters
1. Average no of tuber per
plant
2. Average tuber weight
(gm)
3. Tuber yield per plant
(tones/ ha)
ED).Economics of
cultivation
1. Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha)
2. Gross income (Rs/ha)
3. Net income (Rs/ha)
4. Benefit cost ratio
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
Treatments
30
DAT
60
DAT
90
DAT
120
DAT
T0
Control
11.32
22.92
45.93
66.80
T1
9.50
23.12
44.43
85.01
6.42
23.16
43.94
84.29
8.71
24.65
45.42
80.44
T2
T3
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
9.00
23.46
46.55
86.60
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
9.87
23.51
44.91
79.74
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
10.34
24.64
44.76
76.62
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
10.38
22.81
45.00
75.98
T8
30:19.5:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
14.42
27.42
54.19
91.83
10.07
S
1.41
2.97
23.15
S
1.25
2.62
41.93
S
2.22
4.67
82.37
S
4.19
8.80
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
F- test
S. Ed. ()
C. D. at 5 %
Treatments
T0
Control
T1
9:9:6.75 gm NPK/Plot +
Azospirullum
30 DAT
60 DAT
90 DAT
12
0DAT
11.00
11.66
17.22
19.63
11.58
12.04
19.28
21.01
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
12.24
11.96
17.69
20.14
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
10.28
11.81
18.17
19.75
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
11.04
11.16
17.61
19.45
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
11.27
11.20
17.35
22.54
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
11.25
11.80
17.74
22.11
T7
27:18:11.25 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
11.49
8.42
18.07
21.71
T8
30:19.5:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
13.54
13.91
21.34
25.32
T9
33:21:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
11.22
11.85
17.74
18.91
30 DAT
60 DAT
90 DAT
T0
100:100:80 NPK/kg/ha(RDF)
6.60
10.87
13.93
T1
8.53
13.60
17.27
T2
75%RDF+25% Vermicompost
10.26
15.27
19.40
T3
9.80
14.73
18.40
T4
8.93
14.40
17.40
T5
6.80
11.67
14.20
T6
50%RDF+50% Vermicompost
8.47
13.07
16.60
T7
8.00
12.87
15.67
T8
6.93
12.06
14.47
T9
5.33
9.53
11.33
T10
25%RDF+75% Vermicompost
5.93
10.26
12.73
T11
5.60
9.80
12.53
T12
5.07
S
8.93
S
11.07
S
S. Ed. ()
0.62
0.73
0.86
C. D. at 5 %
1.28
1.51
1.78
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
22.32
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
18.10
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
12.25
19.34
19.95
20.14
19.56
16.31
20.88
20.12
F- test
NS
S. Ed. ()
4.00
C. D. at 5 %
8.41
Effect of Integrated Nutrients Management on the size of vegetative growth to leaves (cm)
Treatments
size of
vegetative
growth to
leaves (cm)
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
63.67
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
55.32
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
29.06
F- test
40.56
58.89
48.14
65.08
54.56
54.38
45.16
S
Treatments
Leaf blade
(cm)
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
18.04
F- test
21.17
25.39
30.62
23.95
22.53
24.86
17.51
26.56
33.55
S
Diameter of
Flowe(cm)
Treatment
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
T6
17.65
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
19.50
21.76
28.33
22.55
22.58
20.71
21.05
23.17
22.76
F- test
S. Ed. ()
1.80
Treatments
Weight of the
flowers (gm)
T0
Control
T1
9:9:6.75 gm NPK/Plot +
Azospirullum
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
55.95
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
68.99
T7
27:18:11.25 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
53.46
T8
30:19.5:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
47.26
T9
33:21:12 gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
73.95
53.19
50.92
64.70
91.96
75.61
F- test
S. Ed. ()
2.89
Treatments
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
20.92
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm
NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
20.25
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
19.50
21.92
20.78
21.00
21.33
33.01
24.17
20.17
f-test
NS
S.E.
4.52
Treatments
Weight of
tubers (g)
T0
Control
T1
T2
12:10.59:7.5 gm NPK/Plot+PSB
T3
15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM
T4
18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot+VC
T5
21:15:9.75 gm NPK/Plot+Azospirillum+FYM
T6
24:16.5:10.5 gm NPK/Plot+Azospirilum+VC
T7
27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB
T8
30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
T9
33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+VC
273.61
f-test
S.E.
198.97
592.79
894.56
317.31
617.52
236.61
957.12
423.13
532.52
S
21.63
Particulars
Land Preparation
Unit
Qty
Rate
Unit(Rs)
Cost
Rs/ha
Total Irigation
Rs. 500
2500
Ploughing
Rs. 300/hr
600
Labour Harrow
Rs. 300/hr
600
Weed Managment
Levelling
Labou
r
Rs.200
600
Hand Weeding
Labou
r
48
Rs.60/lab
2880
Layout
Labou
r
20
Rs.100/lab
2000
Tones
10
Rs.500
5000
hr
10
Rs.100/lab
1000
Fertilizer Applied
FYM
Labour
E Insect control
Unit
Qty
Rate
Unit(Rs)
Cost
Rs/ha
Lit
1.5 Lit
Rs. 300/Lit
450
Bavistin
Ppm
2 Spray
Rs.
75/Spray
150
Labour
Labour
100/Labou
r
300
Flower
10
Rs.60/Lab
600
Tuber
Rs.48/Lab
144
Chlorophyriphos
F Harvesting
31,8624
Depreciation on fix
Capital
4000
200
Miscellaneous
1000
Interest on fix
capital@10%
400
Fixed cost
5600
T0
324224
324224
Income
from tuber
(Rs./ha)
Gross
return=
Income
from flower
+ tuber
(Rs./ha)
10.17
244080
548580
224356
1.69
10.48
251520
608520
280396
1.85
446500
11.43
272160
718660
388886
2.18
448500
11.98
287520
746020
415426
2.26
481500
12.47
299280
780786
449542
2.36
499000
12.86
308640
807640
476066
2.44
522500
13.40
321600
844100
512196
2.54
529500
13.51
324240
853740
521666
2.57
592000
14.04
335960
928960
596736
2.88
557000
13.86
332620
889620
55644
2.67
304500
6.09
T1
324224
3900
328124
357000
7.14
T2
324224
5550
399774
8.93
T3
324224
6370
330594
9.17
T4
324224
7020
331244
9.63
T5
324224
7350
331574
9.98
T6
324224
7700
331924
10.45
T7
324224
7850
332074
10.59
T8
324224
8000
332224
11.84
T9
324224
8950
333174
11.15
(30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot + Azo + PSB + FYM) and minimum plant height (66.80cm) was recorded in T0 (00:00:00 kg
NPK/ha).
2. Maximum number of leaves per plant (25.32) was recorded in treatment T8 (30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot + Azo + PSB+FYM)
and minimum number of leaves per plant (18.91) was recorded in T9 (33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot + Azo + PSB + VC).
3. Maximum girth of stem (22.32) was recorded in treatment T8 (30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot + Azo + PSB + FYM) and minimum
girth of stem (12.25) was recorded in T0 (00:00:00 kg NPK/ha).
4. Maximum vegetative growth of leaves (65.08) was recorded in treatment T4 (18:13.5:9 gm NPK/Plot +VC) and minimum
vegetative growth of leaves (29.06) was recorded in T0 (00:00:00 kg NPK/ha).
5. Maximum leaf bled (33.655) was recorded in treatment T9 (33:21:12 gm NPK/Plot +Azo + PSB+VC.) and minimum leaf
bled(17.51) was recorded in T7(27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot+ Azo +PSB).
6. Maximum diameter of flower (28.33) was recorded in treatment T3 (15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot+FYM) and minimum
diameter of flower (17.65) was recorded in T0 (00:00:00 kg NPK/ha).
7. Maximum weight of flower (91.96) was recorded in treatment T3 (15.9:12:8.25 gm NPK/Plot + FYM) and minimum weight
of flower(47.26) was recorded in T8 (30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot +Azo + PSB + FYM).
8. Maximum number of flowers per plant (33.01) was recorded in treatment T8 (27:18:11.25 gm NPK/Plot +Azo + PSB) and
minimum number of flowers per plant (19.50) was recorded in T0 (00:00:00 kg NPK/ha).
9. Maximum weight of tuber (957.12 gm) was recorded in treatment T8 (30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot + Azo + PSB + FYM) and
minimum weight of tuber(198.97 gm) was recorded in T1 (9:9:6.75 gm NPK/Plot + Azospirullum).
net
return was
recorded
in
treatment T8
with
30:19.5:12
gm
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM (Rs. 5,96,732 /ha) and the minimum (Rs. 2,24,356 /ha) was
recorded in treatment To (00:00:00 NPK).
Maximum
Benefit
cost
NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM
ratio
was
recorded
in
T8
with
30:19.5:12
gm
Maximum gross return, net return and cost: benefit ratio was observed in the treatment
T8 with 30:19.5:12 gm NPK/Plot+Azo+PSB+FYM and recorded the best treatment
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Parya, C., Pal, B. K., and Biswas, J. (2010), Influence of integrated nutrient
management on flower production efficiency, behavior and quality of golden rod.
Environment and Ecology; 2010. 28(4):2203-2205. 5 ref.
Pooja Gupta, and Sunila Kumari Dikshit, S.N., (2012), Response of African
marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) to integrated nutrient management. Annals of Biology;
2012. 28(1):66-67. 4 ref
Rahul Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Sameeksha Raj and Sanjay Kumar (2013).Effect of
integrated nutrient management (inm) on growth and flowering in gladiolus (Gladiolus
grandiflorus L.) c.v. white prosperity. Annals of Horticulture 6(2):242-251
THANK