Sc

CAPITALISM
& WEBBER
COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS

BY :
IOBM PAKISTAN
DELEUZE
MARX

FALAK
NAZ SAYA
MOHAMMAD ARSALAN
 21
c e st Capitali
nt
ur
•“worldy
s m th
18
government” c
where one govt e n t u r yBubble :
•Mississippi
rules the AD 1720 :
world •launches the Louisiana
Company , All had to
• pay taxes.
•Worrld trade •the freedom to issue
orgaization shares and bank notes
and free at will to keep his
economy creature alive and
well..

•Result : rapid
inflation
•Shift from land to
labout
 X

MAI
MA R

N
ARG
UME
•owners of capital are the

NT
dominant capitalist class
(bourgeoisie).

•working class (proletariat) who

do not own capital must live by
selling their labor power
•
•Therefore, working class
suppressed
•
•
 MARX
•Capitalism be replaced by
socialism and eventually by
communism
PROPOSED

•
•Socialism : ownership by the
workers who use the
capital(according to their deeds)
MARX

•Communism :entire community

collectively owns all industries
and everything produced there.
(according needs)
 •capitalism will end through the organized
actions of an international working class

•Perfect capitalism has no monopolies,

unions, government interference, special
advantages for anyone. Just pure competition.
•
•As monopolies emerge, the misery and
exploitation the masses increases until they

M
revolt.

AS
LI
•

TA
•

PI
MA

CA
•
RX

NG
DI
EN
S
ES
OC
PR
 MARX
•North korea : only one
political party, and it
CR controls the government
& TI oppostion allowed. .No
PR IQ •
SI AC UE •all organizations are
TU TI controlled by the govern
AT CA ment
IO L •In socialism : Upper Cl
NS appears which is much beass
off than the Lower Clas tter
s. More
discrimination

•Thus ,Both Communism an

Socialism are infact sh d
capitalism apes of
•
•Also equal distribtuion
according to abilities
needs not possible. Thusand
equality will not prevaie
l.
 Z E
EU

MAI
D E L

N
ARG
UME
•examination of the relationship

NT
between the transformations of
the
mode of production and the
production of subjectivity.

•what sort of subject (what sort

of desires and beliefs) does
capital, or each of the other
modes of production,
require
 DELEUZE
PROPOSED •Modes of production : money and workers
; conditions are necessary, but not
sufficient to the formation of capital.
•
•Territorialization –
Deterritorialization (labor and
capital)–
Rterritorialization(Opeidialization).
DELEUZE

three forces which are continuously in

play in the social field

•substitution of an
“axiomatic(functional elements and
relations whose nature is not
specified)” for a code(relative)
 DE
L EU COMPARISON
ZE
•Desire = MA RX IS M
production of
production •production

•Capitalism distribution
supported by 
•
• consumption
opedipalizati
•
on •
•Exchange
value NOT=
use value
 E R
BB

SPI ITAL
E

CAP
W

RIT ISM
A X
M Acquisition of money is purpose of life

OF
.

•
Time is •money. (time spent idly is not only money spent,
but also the loss of money that could have been earned working).

Credit is money. (if you owe someone money, let him see
you working, not playing).

Utilitarian ethics. (honest and virtue are attributes that

they are good for business).
 MAX WEBBER
•capitalism resulted from Calvisnism.

•with its doctrine of predestination -

i.e. the doctrine that God eternally
MAIN ARGUMENT

decreed the salvation of some and the

damnation of others

•a firm’s orientation is to profit not 
utility) 
•rationality ‘presupposes the battle of man 
with man’ 

•Calvinist did not spend his money on

self-indulgence, so had nothing else to
do with it but plough it back into the
business
 WE
B BE COMPARISON
R
three main MA RXI SM
factors
contributing bourgeoisie owned
the means of
to production and
socioeconomic promoted
stratificatio
•
industrialization to
n: wealth, • maintain their
power, and • position,
prestige • consequently
intensifying the
dispossession of the
workers
 Sc

CAPITALISM
& WEBBER
COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS

BY : IOBM
DELEUZE PAKISTAN
MARX

CONCLUSION: ALL THREE PRESENT

DIFFERENT FORMS OF CAPITLAISM