You are on page 1of 30

KOHLR &Co (A&B)

Asish K Bhattacharyya
Chairperson, Riverside Management Academy Private
Limited

Herbert Kohlers Motive


Why does Herbert Kohler want to do the
recapitalisation?

Why does he want to buy the minority


shareholders out when he already controls about
90% of the company?

09/01/15

09/01/15

Aversion To Publicity And


Public Disclosure
Is Herbert Kohler correct that private is better?
Is Mr. Kohler reaping private benefits of control?

09/01/15

The Dissenters Motive


What do minority shareholders want?

09/01/15

Valuation
How do you determine the share price to be
offered to dissenters?

09/01/15

Comparable Companies
Kitchen and bath products
American Standard
American Wood mark
Masco

Power and generators


Briggs Stratton
Cummins
Detroit Diesel

09/01/15

Valuation
Minority shareholders have de facto no voting rights.
Control premium and minority discount
Minority discount =
1 1/(1+Control Premium)
Control premium of 25% relative to minority share is
equivalent to minority discount of 20% relative to
controlling interest

Lack of marketability
Illiquidity
09/01/15

Minority Discount
Sources of empirical data:
Acquisition premium: 36 49%
Voting premium (in dual class companies): 10
80% [Factors for variation: the degree of
shareholder protection and the possibility of
change in the management]

09/01/15

Discount For Lack of


Marketability
Sources of empirical evidence:
Discount on sale of restricted stock
Private placement (before IPO)
Estimates: 25% - 40%

09/01/15

10

Valuation: Cost of Debt


Interest expenses (Projected):
1998: 11,521 [Ex: 6b]
1999: 14,325 [Ex: 6b]

LT Debt:
1997: 228,940 [Ex: 3a]
1998: 243,939 [Ex: 6a]

Interest rate (pre-tax):


1998 5.03%
1999: 5.87%
09/01/15

11

Valuation: Cost of Debt


Interest expenses (Projected):
1998: 11,521
1999: 14,325

LT Debt:
Average 1998: 236,440
Average 1999 : 223,939

Interest rate (pre-tax):


1998: 4.87%
1999: 6.40%
09/01/15

12

Valuation: Cost of Debt


Interest expenses (Projected):
1998: 11,521
1999: 14,325

LT Debt:
1998: 243,939
1999 : 203,939

Interest rate (pre-tax):


1998: 4.72%
1999: 7.02%
09/01/15

13

Valuation: Tax Rate


Tax Expense:
1998: 38,585[ Ex: 6b]
1999: 46,071

Income Before Tax:


1998: 87,175
1999: 106,103

Tax Rate:
1998: 44.26%
1999: 43.60%
09/01/15

14

Post-Tax Cost of Debt


6.40(1 0.4360) = 3.61%

09/01/15

15

Cost of Equity
What should be the risk-free rate of return?
What should be the ?
What should be the market premium?

09/01/15

16

Risk-Free Rate of Return


20-year US Government Bond: 6% [Exhibit 8]

09/01/15

17

Market Premium
Average difference between stock and bond
annual returns over the period 1926-1997

7.2%

09/01/15

18

Determination of Beta ()
Net Sales [Ex: 4]:
Kitchen and Bath Group: 1,485,831 (67%)
Power systems Group: 540,260 (24%)
Interior Group: 145,414 (7%)
Hospitality& R. Estate Group: 50789 (2%)

09/01/15

19

Determination of Beta ()
Net Income [Ex:4]:
Kitchen and Bath Group: 87,411(77%)
Power systems Group: 20,339 (18%)
Interior Group: 4,001 (4%)
Hospitality& R. Estate Group: 1,121 (1%)

09/01/15

20

Determination of Beta ()
Sales and Net Income of two major Groups
Sales:
Kitchen and Bath Group: 1,485,831 (73.33%)
Power systems Group: 540,260 (26.67%)

Net Income:
Kitchen and Bath Group: 87,411(89%)
Power systems Group: 20,339 (11%)

09/01/15

21

Determination of Beta (): Most


Current Data
ASD

AMW MAS
D

BGG

CUM DDC

Equity
Beta [7b]

0.82

0.76

1.28

0.66

1.09

1.30

E/V

0.59

0.95

0.89

0.81

0.65

0.84

Debt
Beta

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Asset
Beta

0.49

0.72

1.14

0.53

0.70

1.09
09/01/15

22

Determination of Beta ():


Average of Latest Three Years
ASD

AMW MAS
D

BGG

CUM DDC

Equity
Beta

0.82

0.76

1.28

0.66

1.09

1.30

E/V

0.55

0.87

0.82

0.89

0.75

0.80

Debt
Beta

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Asset
Beta

0.45

0.66

1.04

0.58

0.82

1.04
09/01/15

23

Determination of Beta ():


Most Current Data
Asset
Beta

E/V

Equity
Beta

Average of Kitchen and Bath


comparable companies

0.78

0.81

0.97

Average of Power and Systems


comparable companies

0.78

0.77

1.02

Average of six comparable companies

0.78

0.79

0.99

Weighted Average 80% Kitchen and


Bath and 20% Power and Systems

0.78

0.80

0.97
09/01/15

24

Determination of Beta ():


Most Current Data
WACC

Equity
Beta

Cost of
equity

After
tax cost
of debt

Average of Kitchen and Bath


comparable companies

0.97

13.0%

3.7% 11.2%

Average of Power and Systems


comparable companies

1.02

13.3%

3.7% 11.1%

Average of six comparable


companies

0.99

13.1%

3.7% 11.1%

Weighted Average 80% Kitchen


and Bath and 20% Power and
Systems

0.97

13.0%

3.7% 11.2%
09/01/15

25

Determination of Beta ():


Average of Latest Three Years
Asset
Beta

E/V

Equity
Beta

Average of Kitchen and Bath


comparable companies

0.72

0.75

0.96

Average of Power and Systems


comparable companies

0.81

0.81

1.00

Average of six comparable companies

0.77

0.78

0.98

Weighted Average 80% Kitchen and


Bath and 20% Power and Systems

0.74

0.76

0.97
09/01/15

26

Determination of Beta ():


Average of Latest Three Years
Equity
Beta

Cost of
equity

After
tax cost
of debt

WAC
C

Average of Kitchen and Bath


comparable companies

0.96 12.9% 3.7% 10.6%

Average of Power and Systems


comparable companies

1.00 13.2% 3.7% 11.4%

Average of six comparable


companies

0.98 13.1% 3.7% 11.0%

Weighted Average 80% Kitchen


and Bath and 20% Power and
Systems

0.97 13.0% 3.7% 10.8%


09/01/15

27

Total Beta
CAPM fundamental assumptions do not hold for
a family-owned company like Kohler.

Indeed, if most of the Kohler familys wealth is

tied to the company, they will not only be


exposed to systematic risk (measured by beta),
but also to Kohler Co.s idiosyncratic risk.

This may be true for Herbert Kohler, his sister,

and his children, as well as for those dissenters


who are Kohler family members, although not
for the outside shareholders, particularly the
Sogen and Franklin funds.
09/01/15

28

Total Beta
One way to adjust the standard CAPM to account
for total risk is to use a total beta instead of
the usual market beta.

Total beta is defined as the ratio of the standard


deviations of the investment and the market,
without multiplying it by the correlation between
the investment and the market as we do for the
standard (market) beta

Total = i/m

09/01/15

29

END

09/01/15

30

You might also like