Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODS
MDSC3200
Affette McCaw-Binns, Community Health
Learning Objectives
2
6.
7.
Quantitative vs Qualitative
Research
08/27/15
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Why sample?
5
Example:
Population medical/dental students knowledge of
epidemiology
Sample - responses to quiz questions on epidemiology
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
General principles
6
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Population terms
7
Population
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Types of samples
8
Convenience
Snowball
Quota
Simple random
Systematic
Stratified
Cluster
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Non-probability
Convenience sample
Drawback:
Sample may not be representative
Some units may be over-selected, other underselected or missed altogether
Impossible to adjust for such distortions
08/27/15
Non-probability
10
Quota sampling
Species of the convenience sample
Composition of sample determined beforehand
Sample units selected so that all categories of
specific characteristic is represented = Quotas,
e.g.
11
Non-probability
Purposive sample
Drawback:
External validity?
Non-probability
12
Snowball sampling
Drawback:
Sample may not be representative
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
13
Non-probability
Caution: use sparingly
08/27/15
Probability sampling
14
08/27/15
Probability
15
Requirement/Drawback:
Sampling frame
08/27/15
08/27/15
39634
14595
30734
64628
42831
80583
00209
05409
95836
65358
62349
35050
71571
89126
95113
70361
90404
20830
22530
70469
74088
40469
83722
91254
43511
41047
99457
01911
91785
87149
65564
27478
79712
24090
42082
26792
72570
60767
80210
89509
16379
44526
25775
25752
15140
78466
42194
55248
34361
72176
McCaw-Binns
19713
67331
65178
03091
34733
03395
49043
79253
52228
18103
08/27/15
39153
93365
07763
39411
68076
17635
24330
12317
33869
55169
Drawbacks:
Representativeness not guaranteed,
especially if sample is small
While ideal, rarely possible in the
real world
08/27/15
Systematic sample
19
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Probability
Systematic sample I
20
Process:
08/27/15
21
Disadvantage:
a)
b)
08/27/15
Probability
Stratified sampling I
22
Examples?
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
proportionate allocation
Advantage:
24
Selecting a stratified
sample
Process:
08/27/15
Cluster sampling
25
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
26
08/27/15
Provisos
27
Remember
The unit of selection is the cluster
Characteristics of members within a
cluster may be correlated
Large clusters can bias results if
individual characteristics pooled
Better to have many small clusters than
few large clusters
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
08/27/15
Advantages
08/27/15
Weighting
30
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
31
PROBABILITY
Multi-stage sampling
08/27/15
32
Summary 1: Lesson
exercises
Cluster sample
What
08/27/15
Summary 2: Sample A
33
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Summary 2: Sample A
34
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Summary 3: Sample B
35
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Summary 4: Sample C
36
Investigators wish to
assess the association
between dietary
Campus Tot Mal Femal
practices
2008/9
al and
es
es
-FM
attitudes
towards
S
lifestyle and nutrition
Cave Hill 188 60
128
counseling among
(32% (68%)
medical students
on
)
all 3 UWI
campuses.
Mona
308
887
2194
1
(29%select
(71%)
How might
they
)
a sample for this
St
200 725
1282
study?
Augustin 7
(36% (64%)
Location?
Gender?
Differences in class
size?
Would the campus
specific gender
distribution be an
issue?
McCaw-Binns
08/27/15
Summary 5: sampling
37
08/27/15