Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Staffing
You can legally refuse to hire someone based on their zodiac symbol.
Legally, companies can only give name, position title, and years of
employment to companies who are asking for references.
The most valid employment interviews are designed around each
candidates unique background.
Surveys that directly ask employees how important pay is to them are
likely to overestimate pays true importance in actual decisions related to
employment.
Although there are integrity tests that try to predict whether someone
will steal, be absent, or otherwise take advantage of an employer, they
dont work in practice because people lie on them.
On average, applicants who answer job advertisements are likely to have
higher turnover than those referred by other employees.
On average, conscientiousness is a better predictor of job performance
than is intelligence.
Companies that screen job applicants for values have higher performance
than those that screen for intelligence.
FALSE
TRUE
Validity
rank
Use rank
Validity
rank
Work sample
1 (0.54)
2 (0.53)
Biodata inventory
3 (0.37)
Integrity test
4 (0.34)
Conscientiousness test
5 (0.31)
Unstructured interview
6 (0.23)
Reference check
7 (0.16)
Application blank
8 (0.10)
Use rank
Validity
rank
Use rank
Work sample
1 (0.54)
4 (15-20%)
2 (0.53)
6 (15-20%)
Biodata inventory
3 (0.37)
8 (10-15%)
Integrity test
4 (0.34)
7 (10-15%)
Conscientiousness test
5 (0.31)
5 (15-20%)
Unstructured interview
6 (0.23)
2 (90+%)
Reference check
7 (0.16)
3 (80+%)
Application blank
8 (0.10)
1 (90+%)
Discussion Questions
Nature of Staffing
Definition
Implications of definition
Outsourcing
Technology
Organization
(person)
(job)
Recruitment
(identification and attraction)
Selection
(assessment and evaluation)
Employment
(decision making and match)
Recruitment
Selection
Employment
Recruitment
Selection
Employment
Staffing is Contingent
Examples of Variations
Staffing is Contingent
Examples of Variations
Staffing is Contingent
Examples of Variations
University staffing
Staffing is Contingent
Examples of Variations
HR Metrics
Services
Costs
Attitudes
Performance
Employee development
Learning new skills
Developing career tracks
Work outcomes
Improved coordination
Reduced turnover
Higher productivity
Organization outcomes
Stock prices
Lower admin. costs
Revenues
Customer service
Performance management
Measuring outcomes
Rewarding performance
Competitive advantage
Staffing is contingent
Staffing Levels
Acquire or develop
talent
Lag or lead system
External or internal
hiring
Core or flexible
workforce
Hire or retain
National or global
Attract or relocate
Overstaff or understaff
Hire or acquire
Staffing Quality
Person/Job or
Person/Organization
match
Specific or general
KSAOs
Exceptional or
acceptable workforce
quality
Active or passive
diversity
Components of Staffing
Organizations Model
(continued)
Staffing strategy
Support activities
HR configurations:
Matching Sets of HR Practices
Internal market
External market
Head manager
Labor market of
experienced
managers
Head manager
Assistant
manager
Labor market of
experienced
assistant
managers
Assistant
manager
Management
trainee
Labor market of
new college
graduates
Team leader
Advantages of
internal
Commitment
Stability
Consistency
Save on
hiring
Advantages of
external
Flexibility
Speed
Learn best
practices
Save on
retention
Core workforce
Employees who
add considerable
value to the
organization
Perform jobs that
cannot be
replaced
Hiring is long term
and high
commitment
Flexible workforce
Employees who
perform peripheral
functions that dont
address the
organizations
strategic advantage
Hired through
external firms or on
a
contingency/contra
ct basis
Criterion
Construct
Predictor
Measure X
Criterion
Measure Y
Problem
solving
ability
Successful
team
leadership
Score on a test
Revenues from
of IQ
team projects
Problem solving ability is the predictor construct
IQ test score is an actual measure of PSA
Successful team leadership is the criterion construct
Revenues from projects is an actual measure of success
Developing a theory
Proving relationships
Group
Job
Work preferences
Personality
Demography
Task requirements
Rewards for this job
Authority for this job
Concepts:
Person/Organization
Match Model
Multiple jobs
Future jobs
Support
for people,
collaborative,
team
Think about yourRespect
own preferences
for a minute
and how this might
relate
vs. to your experiences
orientedin the world of work.
independe Respect for ideas, independent,
nce
individual-oriented
Person-Organization Fit:
Why Does it Matter?
Match
Person
KSAOs
Motivation
HR Outcomes
Impact
Attraction
Attraction
Performance
Performance
Retention
Retention
Attendance
Attendance
Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Other
Other
KSAOs to requirements
Motivation to rewards
Job requirements
expressed in terms of
both
Tasks involved
KSAOs necessary for
performance of tasks
Exh. 1.4:
Person/Organization Match
Organization
Values
New Job
Duties
Job
Requirements
Rewards
Multiple
Jobs
HR Outcomes
Future
Jobs
Match
Person
KSAOs
Motivation
Impact
Attraction
Attraction
Performance
Performance
Retention
Retention
Attendance
Attendance
Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Other
Other
Discussion Questions
Would it be desirable to hire
people only according to the
person/job match, ignoring the
person/organization match?
Why?
How are staffing activities
influenced by training or
compensation activities?
Job Analysis:
Tools to Improve Person-Job Fit
KSAOs
Competency-Based Job
Analysis
Nature of competencies
KSAOs or Competencies?
Examples of Competencies
Organization Usage
Discussion Questions
Ethical Issues
Issue 1
Issue 2