Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research
perspectives in
accounting
Classification of accounting
researchers
The typology of Jung seems to be the
most useful in classifying scientists in
general and accounting researchers in
particular
Jung classified individuals by the way
they receive information (either by
sensation or intuition) and the way they
reach decisions (either by thinking or
feeling)
Accounting methodology
perspectives
The widely accepted view of the role of accounting
research is that it functions to establish general
laws covering the behavior of empirical events or
objects with which the science is concerned, and
thereby enables us to connect our knowledge of
separately known events
The natural-science model, which includes careful
sampling, accurate measurement, and good design
and analysis of theory-supported hypotheses, is
generally adopted as the model supporting good
research
The natural-science model has met with objection,
leading to the ideographic versus nomothetic
methodology debate
Convergent methodology
There is an established school of thought
that recommends the use of multiple
methods
It is generally described as one of
convergent methodology, multi-method/
multi-trait, convergent validation, or what
has been called triangulation
According to Allport, the ideographic and
nomothetic methods were overlapping and
contributing to one another
Three options
What convergent methodology implies for
research practice is an eventual choice
between three options:
1. pursue both nomothetic and ideographic
research and the aggregate
2. alternate between both nomothetic and
ideographic research, running back and
forth between the two methods to
capitalise on the strengths of one method
in certain cases and overcome the
deficiencies of the other method in other
cases
Formism
Relates philosophically to realism and platonic
idealism, with exponents like Plato and Aristotle
Its root metaphor is similarity
It includes both analytic and dispersive theories
The central activity is description on the basis of
similarities, without concern for the sources of
the similarities
The description in formism rests on three
categories: characters, particulars and
participation
What appears in formism is that truth is the
degree of similarity of a description to its object
of reference
Mechanism
Relates philosophically to the naturalism or
materialism of Democrites, Lucretius, Galileo,
Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, Berkely, Hu and
Reichenbach
Includes both analytic and integrative theories
Its root metaphor is a machine
Like formism, mechanism is an analytical theory
focusing on discrete elements rather than
complexes or contexts
Unlike formism, mechanism is integrative in the
sense that its world is well-ordered: the facts
occur in a determinate order and, were enough
known, they could be predicted or at least
described as being necessarily just what they are
Mechanism (contd)
Six features characterise the mechanistic type
of knowledge:
1. like a machine, the object of study is
composed of parts having specified
locations
2. the parts can be expressed in a quantitative
form, corresponding to the primary
qualities of the machine
3. a lawful relationship between the parts of a
study object can be described by functional
equations or statistical correlations this is
the statement of the interrelationships
among the parts of the machine
Mechanism (contd)
4. In addition to the primary qualities, there
are other characteristics that can be
expressed quantitatively, although they are
not directly relevant to the object of study
these are secondary qualities
5. The secondary qualities are also related by
some principle to the object of study
because if there were to be a complete
description of the machine we should want
to find out and describe just what the
principle was which kept certain secondary
qualities attached to certain parts of the
machine
Mechanism (contd)
6. Secondary laws characterise the stable
relationship between the secondary
qualities
The truth theory of mechanism is whether
the machine works, which is measured by
workability, which comes down to whether
or not ones knowledge allows predictions of
the outcomes of any casual adjustments
made in the system
Contextualism
Relates to the pragmatism of Pierce,
James, Bergson, Dewey and Mead
It includes both synthetic and dispersive
theories
Its root metaphor is the historic event or
the act in context
Unlike formism, contextualism is synthetic,
in that it forcuses on a pattern (a Gestalt)
as the object of study rather than on
disparate facts
Contextualism (contd)
Like formism, contextualism is dispersive,
in that the focus is on the interpretation of
facts retrieved one by one from a universe
of facts
These facts are characterised by
continuously changing patterns, making
change and novelty the fundamental
contextualistic categories
Formism in accounting
Formism in accounting consists of searching
for similarities and differences between
different objects of study without any concern
for potential relationships among them
It may be argued that all of the technical
knowledge in accounting that is used in the
teaching of accounting and included in
standard textbooks is to a great extent
inescapably formistic
Formism fits well in accounting practice, where
categorisation is tantamount to reaching
solutions
Mechanism in accounting
Mechanism in accounting consists of not
only looking for similarities and
differences between objects of study but
also and mainly for quantitative
relationships that allow both description
and prediction
Mechanism in accounting is also the
search for empirical regularities among
different phenomena through various
forms of statistical correlation
Contextualism in accounting
Contextualism in accounting focuses on
the interpretation of independent facts
drawn from a universe of facts in a
specific context that would create a
pattern or Gestalt
It may be argued that any new
accounting technical knowledge that is
accumulated for specific contexts
constitutes a good example of
contextualism in accounting
Organicism in accounting
Those who adopt organicism in
accounting are focusing on specific
Gestalt as objects of study, which are
composed of well-ordered and
integrated facts that can be described as
well as predicted
Like mechanism in accounting,
organicism seeks the determination of
empirical regularities between different
phenomena through various forms of
statistical analysis
Perspectives on accounting
research
Accounting research is elective and diverse
Like every other social science, accounting bases
its research upon assumptions about the nature of
social science and the nature of society
An approach applied by Burrel and Morgan to
organisational analysis can be used to differentiate
between four visions of research in accounting:
functionalist
interpretive
radical humanist
radical structuralist