Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Net Neutrality
Content Providers
vs. ISP
vs. Consumers
PREPARED BY:
PATEL JAY C (140870705004)
ME(EC-1ST SHIFT)
PIT
As you can see, your ISP is what connects your computer to the
internet, which other computers and servers connect to via their
ISP. There are several ways to connect to the ISP, which include
using a dial-up modem over a phone line, cable, or satellite.
Proponents
Google
Yahoo!
Vonage
Ebay
Amazon
Microsoft
Christian Coalition
Gun Owners of
America
AARP
Tim Berners-Lee
Robert W. McChesney
Moby
Steve Wozniak
Arguments for
Control of data
Cable and internet company must allow ISPs free access to their networks and
should not screening or filtering of data
that
the
Internet
remains
free
and
open
technology
Opponents
Goldwater Institute
Cato Institute
Comcast
Arguments Against
o Innovation and investment
o Bandwidth availability
o Opposition to legislation
o Spam, Virus
Table of Contents
Economics
Net Neutrality is the building block of the abundance-based
economy on the Internet. Significantly effecting the dollars
that we would have back in our pockets, online publishers
would, under Net Neutrality be able to raise its cost of
publishing back to its former level. When Net Neutrality ends,
the monopoly begins again. Sites like West Seattle Blog are
profitable because of this reason.
Continued on Next
Page
Legal Issues
Who has the right to hold the reigns to the Internet?
Do the telecommunication companies own the
Internet?
The answer is no. Telecommunication companies are
merely a means to an end. In other words, they are merely
the gateway to the Internet; they dont own the Internet
themselves.
Telecommunication companies should be concerned with
providing the best product to their customers rather than
limiting their output. If they decide to change the current
system, assuredly the people would not stand for it, nobody
wants a regulated Internet (Press 2006).
Rebuttal:
With Net Neutrality, you are offered a choice. If the internet was not
neutral you would be forced to utilize certain products dictated by
the service provider, to illustrate this metaphorically, this would be
like being forced to use Pepsi or Coke depending on the restaurants
(internet service provider) you are utilizing.
But the difference between Internet service providers & restaurants
is that you have the freedom to go to a different restaurant or store
to obtain your preferred soda. If where you live determines what
service provider you use, or if the government of your country is
running the internet, there is no where for you to turn to get the
products or services you desire (websites, etc.)
Concluding Statements
In conclusion, the Internet should be a neutral place for all
of its users. Not all cars are created are the same, but all
should be allowed on the highway. The same is true with
Internet traffic. File sharing and increased usage, as well
as profits are all issues to the Internet corporations. What
this is about, though, is the consumer. Its the consumer
that the corporations should cater too, and its the
consumer that counts.