Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13TH EDITION
THOMAS L. WHEELEN
J. DAVID HUNGER
Learning Objectives
Understand a companys business model and how it could be
imitated
Assess a companys corporate culture and how it might affect
a proposed strategy
Scan functional resources to determine their fit with a firms
strategy
5-2
5-4
Rare
Imitability
Obj2: Use the VRIO framework and the value chain to assess an
organizations competitive advantage and how it can be sustained
5-6
5-7
Obj2: Use the VRIO framework and the value chain to assess an
organizations competitive advantage and how it can be sustained
5-8
5-9
5-10
Obj2: Use the VRIO framework and the value chain to assess an
organizations competitive advantage and how it can be sustained
5-11
5-12
5-14
The resource-based view of the firm is an attempt to bring attention to the importance of a
corporation's resources in strategic management. Porter's concepts of industry analysis and
competitive strategy alone cant determine a firm's profit potential. emphasis on the industry
tended to ignore a firm's core skills and competencies. What good is the knowledge that a
niche in the market exists that can be reached through a focused differentiation competitive
strategy if a corporation doesn't have the resources to implement such a strategy? As
noted in the text, experts on the resource-based view suggest that differences in
performance among companies may be explained best, not through differences in industry
structure identified by industry analysis, but through differences in corporate assets and
resources and their application. The resource-based view of the firm is compatible with the
traditional concepts of S.W.O.T. The only danger with the resource-based approach is that
people may go overboard again and tend to put too much emphasis on internal factors and
not enough on external factors. Nevertheless, the idea that the durability and imitability of
corporate resources determine competitive advance is a very useful one. The movement
toward a more global environment simply accentuates the need to assess and to build a
firms competencies so that it can successfully compete world-wide. A competency may be
distinctive in ones home country, but only be a core competency (or less) in another
location in the world.
5-15
Business models
Advertising model:
Switchboard model:
5-17
5-18
5-19
Upstream
Downstream
5-22
- Primary activities:
1. Inbound logistics:
raw materials handling
2. Operations
3. Outbound
logistics: distribution
Support activities:
ensure
that the primary value chain
activities operate effectively
Procurement
Technology
development
Human resource
management
Firm infrastructure
5-24
5-25
5-26
The focus of value-chain analysis is to examine the corporation in the context of the overall
chain of value-creating activities, of which the firm may be only a small part. In industry
value-chain analysis, the value chain is split into two segments, upstream and downstream
parts with the corporation under examination being the focal point. In analyzing the complete
value chain of a product, note that even if a firm operates up and down the entire industry
chain, it usually has a center of gravity - an area of primary expertise where its primary
activities (and core competencies) lie. One goal of industry value-chain analysis is to identify
where on the chain is the activity providing the greatest return on investment. This might be
an activity which a corporation might want to expand when doing strategic planning.
In corporate value-chain analysis, each corporation has its own internal value
chain of activities. Each of a companys product lines has its own distinctive value
chain. Because most corporations make several different products or services, an
internal analysis of the firm involves analyzing a series of different value chains.
The systematic examination of individual value activities can lead to a better
understanding of a corporations strengths and weaknesses - thus supporting
strategic planning.
5-28
Divisional:
Conglomerate :
5-31
5-36
5-38
5-39
5-41
5-44
5-46
Although technological discontinuity is discussed in the chapter, the answer to this question is
not provided. Igor Ansoff recommends that strategic managers deal with the issue of
technology substitution by (1) continuously searching for sources from which new technologies
are likely, (2) as the technology surfaces, making a timely commitment either to acquire the
new technology or to prepare to leave the market, and (3) reallocating resources from
improvements in the older processoriented technology to investments in the newer, typically
productoriented, technology as the new technology approaches commercial realization. In his
book, The Innovators Dilemma, Christensen explains how difficult it is for a firm to continue to
build and market its current products to its current customers using current, well-understood
technology when it is trying to create new products for new customers using new, untested
technology. The cost and time requirements to stay up to date with new and
5-48
unit
production costs decline by some
fixed percentage each time the total
accumulated volume of production
units doubles
5-50
The actual percentage varies by industry and is based on many variables: e.g., the
amount of time it takes a person to learn a new task, and many others.
For example, in an industry with an 85% experience curve, a corporation might expect a
15% reduction in unit costs for every doubling of volume.. Achieving these results often
means investing in R&D and fixed assets; higher fixed costs and less flexibility thus
result. Nevertheless the manufacturing strategy is one of building capacity ahead of
demand in order to achieve the lower unit costs that develop from the experience curve.
On the basis of some future point on the experience curve, the corporation should price
the product or service very low to preempt competition and increase market demand.
Management commonly uses the experience curve in estimating the production costs of
(1) a product never before made with the present techniques and processes or (2)
current products produced by newly introduced techniques or processes. For example,
a cleaning company can reduce its costs per employee by having its workers use the
same equipment and techniques to clean many adjacent offices in one office building
rather than just cleaning a few offices in multiple buildings. Although many firms have
used experience curves extensively, an unquestioning acceptance of the industry norm
(such as 80% for the airframe industry or 70% for integrated circuits) is very risky. The
experience curve of the industry as a whole might not hold true for a particular company
for a variety of reasons
5-51
Q4.What are the pros and cons of management's using the experience curve to
determine strategy?
5-52
Q4.What are the pros and cons of management's using the experience curve to determine
strategy?
The experience curve concept does have its limitations, however. For one thing, it does not
consider that a corporation can be very profitable with very low leverage by occupying a
dependable niche in the marketplace based upon some differentiating strategy such as quality
or snob appeal. Rolls Royce automobiles and Maytag washers are just two examples of firms
ignoring the experience curve by pricing at a cost above the market price and still achieving
solid profits. Differentiation and focus strategies can be very successful without using the
experience curve. Another limitation of the experience curve is that much of its success is
based upon economies of scale. The use of computers and robots, however, negates much of
the experience curve advantages. The curve in a CAD/CAM plant might be so steep that all
the experience advantages are learned in the production of two thousand instead of two
million units. The implication is that a firm following Henderson's strategy of cost leadership
based on an assumed experience curve might find it very difficult to reach the required high
market share break-even point when its competitors using CAD/CAM can quickly meet its
price in the marketplace by going quickly down their own experience curves. Although it is
possible to have a number of successful niches in a given product/service market, only one
star position is available in Henderson's growth-share matrix. The risk is therefore very high to
a corporation contemplating a low cost strategy by using an assumed experience curve.
5-53
5-55
5-56
5-57
5-58
5-59
8. Strategic Information
Systems/Technology Issues
Information systems/technology
contributions to performance:
Automation of back office processes
Automation of individual tasks
Enhancement of key business functions
Development of a competitive
advantage
Prentice Hall, Inc. 2012
5-60
Strategic Information
Systems/Technology Issues
Current trends in Information
systems/technology Internet include:
Intranet
Extranet
Web 2.0
Prentice Hall, Inc. 2012
5-61
Strategic Information
Systems/Technology Issues
Supply chain management- networks
for sourcing raw materials,
manufacturing products or creating
services, storing, and distributing
goods, and delivering them to
customers and consumers
5-62
5-63
5-64
Obj3: Construct an IFAS Table that summarizes internal factors
5-65
Obj3: Construct an IFAS Table that summarizes internal factors