Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. Pavement Design
A. Overview
Degree of curvature
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
How to build a road!
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a
penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical
strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It
was developed by the California Department of
Transportation.
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test
for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road
subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the
California Department of Transportation.
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
3. The Test
Take load readings at penetrations of:
the result
0.025 70 psi
0.05...115 psi
0.1.220 psi
0.2.300 psi
0.4.320 psi
6 mold
Achieve OM &MD
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
Example above:
for 0.1 of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2 of penetration, 300 psi
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
Example above:
for 0.1 of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2 of penetration, 300 psi
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
Example above:
for 0.1 of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2 of penetration, 300 psi
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
In General:
The harder the surface, the higher the CBR rating.
A CBR of 3 equates to tilled farmland,
A CBR of 4.75 equates to turf or moist clay,
Moist sand may have a CBR of 10.
High quality crushed rock has a CBR over 80.
The standard material for this test is crushed California
limestone which has a value of 100.
Example above:
for 0.1 of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2 of penetration, 300 psi
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
1. Determine
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
1. Determine
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
2. Primary Goals
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the
minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway
pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000
wheel load)?
CBR subbase of 8,
Taxiway, and wheel load
of 40,000 lb
23 inches
23 inches of
total earth material
and pavement
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the
minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway
pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000
wheel load) 23 inches
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the
minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway
pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000
wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
Wheel Pound Loads
15,000 or less
15k-40k
40k-70k
70k-150k
CBR Value
50
65
80
80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k.....2
>15k-40k..3
>40k-55k..4
>55k-70k..5
>70k..6
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the
minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway
pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000
inches
wheel 23
load)
3 inches
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
6 inches of CBR 65/80
CBR Value
50
65
80
80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k.....2
>15k-40k..3
>40k-55k..4
>55k-70k..5
>70k..6
V. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
CBR = 80
CBR Value
50
65
80
80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k.....2
>15k-40k..3
>40k-55k..4
>55k-70k..5
>70k..6
V. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
CBR = 80
CBR Value
50
65
80
80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k.....2
>15k-40k..3
>40k-55k..4
>55k-70k..5
>70k..6
Need = 9 minimum
thickness
CBR = 27 for
remainder of base
(14)
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3 of wearing surface
6 of CBR 80 in upper 6
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3 of wearing surface
6 of CBR 80 in upper 6
A CBR of 15 requires X above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3 of wearing surface
6 of CBR 80 in upper 6
A CBR of 15 requires 15 above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3 of wearing surface
6 of CBR 80 in upper 6
A CBR of 15 requires 15 above it
A CBR of 30 requires X above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3 of wearing surface
6 of CBR 80 in upper 6
A CBR of 15 requires 15 above it
A CBR of 30 requires 9 above it
Your turn.
Subbase of CBR=7,
50,000 lb loads for a taxiway
CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15
Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing costs and stability
Your turn.
Sub base of CBR=7,
50,000 lb loads for a taxiway
CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15
Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing
costs and stability
Solution:
Total Thickness: 28
Wearing Surface Thickness: 4
Upper 6 of CBR=80
CBR 30 of 7
CBR 15 of 11
Homework:
Subbase of CBR=15,
70,000 lb loads for a runway
CBR materials available: 80, 40, 20
Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing costs and stability