Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Content.
1. Motivations.
2. Methodology.
3. Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking.
4. Local Matching Filter.
5. Prestack Modeling.
6. Simulation Results in MATLAB of
Diffraction Stack Migration.
7. Conclusion.
Motivations
Problem:
Receiver
interval of OBS data is
(sometimes) too large
Water
Solution: Interferometric
interpolation
Water
Benefits of Interferometric
Interpolation:
Accuracy (wave-equation based
scheme)
Methodology
OBS
SWP
OBS
G ( A | B) 2ik G ( A | x)G0 (x | B) *d 2 x G0 ( A | B) *
S
x resolution limit
Super-resolutionRayleigh
Super-stacking
NM vs. N
M: # of
events
Virtual
Dense
Data
d t, x0 d t, x0 * f t, x0
d real t , x0 d virtual t, x0 * f t, x0
Time (s)
Time (s)
real
3.0
X (km)
4.5
3.0
X (km)
4.5
virtual
GREENs FUNCTION
iw|x-x|/c
G(x|x) = e
|x-x|
|x-x|
x
x
Phase
Geom.
Spread
Prestack Migration
Migration is the last major process that is
applied to seismic data before it is interpreted.
This is likely to be blamed for all sort of things
like inconsistent amplitudes and lack of
structural details even though these problems
may arise from acquisition or earlier
processing steps.
Migration can be classified as Prestack
migration or Poststack migration.
Migartion is performed on prestacked data
either on shot gathers or CMP data.
Prestack Modeling
During the acquisition, the same subsurface point
may be hit several time by emitted waves, we will
therefore have multiple information from the same
point.
In classic poststack processing, the model is assumed
to be a set of flat, horizontal and homogeneous
layers hence hyperbolic moveout curves for stacking.
Prestack time migration is necessary when the
geological structures present conflicting dips,
resulting in conflicting stacking velocities.
Performing migration directly in depth and from the
prestack data is therefore necessary in case of
various dips and lateral velocity variations.
0 km
corner
30 m
0 m
30 m
Born Modeling
d(x) =
data
~ ) g(x|x)g(x|x) o(x)dx
W(
Model
Space
model
Scatterer
Born Modeling
-i
2
-i
x
x
xx
~
e
e
d(x|x)= W( )
o(x)
x
A(x,x)
A(x,x)
2
-2
-2c (1- [c / c0] )
Scatterer
Time-Domain
Diffraction Stack Modeling
i~ t
d e d(x) =
- i xx - i xx
i t
~
d e W( ) e o(x) e
A(x,x)
A(x,x)
x
..
Born
Modeling
..
d(x,t) ==
( t- xx- xx)
o(x)
A(x,x) A(x,x)
(xs ,0)
/c
(xg ,0)
(x,z)
2
t = (x-xs) +z
+ (x-x g) +z
Born Modeling
..
o(x)
A(x,x) A(x,x)
Cancelation
(xs ,0)
(xg ,0)
(x,z)
Born Modeling
..
o(x)
A(x,x) A(x,x)
(xs ,0)
(xg ,0)
(x,z)
2
t = (x-xs) +z
+ (x-x g) +z
Born Approximation
Wavelet
Spectrum
~
W(
d(x) = ) G(x|x)G(x|x) o(x)dx
data
Model
Space
Propagates Scattered
Energy from Scatt. at
x to Receiver at x
Reflectivity
Propagates Energy from
Src at x to Scatterer at x
~
m(x) = d
-i xx - i xx
~
W(* ) e
x
..
d(x,
= d(x, xx+ xx )
x
A(x,x)
d(x)
A(x,x)
Broadband
case
~
W( )=1
A(x,x) A(x,x)
SUMMARY
1. Exploding Reflector Modeling = Diffraction Stack Modeling
Sum over
reflectors
w( xx+ xx- t )
R(x)
Source wavelet
Geom.
spreading
Conclusion.
MATLAB for technical computing applied to
seismic interferometric by using Greens function
leading to super resolution of the image.
A major benefit of seismic interferometric is that
source receiver array, after interferometric
redatuming becomes closer to the imaging target.
This means that the distorting effects of the
uninteresting part of the medium are avoided
leading to better image resolution of the target.
This gives a very clear image which can show the
formation of the earth and possible hydrocarbon
deposited in that part of the subsurface.
THE END,
THANK YOU ALL.