Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
ANEESH
Agenda
Market Overview
Product and Value Proposition
The Concept
Marketing Strategy
Tactics and Launch Plan
Summary
the world
Adoption Rate Fastest Ever, Passing DVD Player
Foundation for an entirely new Industry &
Eco-System
22%
3%
75%
iPad
Android
Others
Porters 5 forces
Industry Rivalry
Power of buyers
The power of buyers for white goods makers
like Samsung is somewhat of a mixed bag
Though the buyers have a multitude of
options to choose from
Power of suppliers
In many markets in which Samsung operates,
there are many suppliers who are willing to
offer their services at a discount since the
ancillary sectors are very deep. Since they
have an upper hand the power of suppliers is
low.
Threat of substitutes
Many substitutes are available in the market.
Because of that the company always focuses
Environmental factors
Political Situation
Economic Situation
Socio-Cultural Situation
Dense population
People depend more on mobile communication everywhere.
Higher educational level in the world.
Cultures perception of the technological devices is positive
worldwide.
Literacy & illiteracy level is not affecting using cell phones /
tablets but affecting high technological cell phones, this
fact needs to be considered.
Technological Situation
Customers Analysis
Customer analysis
Sort of buying behavior
High involvement purchasing
Significant difference between brands which leads to a
complex purchasing behavior.
Cultural factors
A concept that everyone should have at least one
electronic product has been built.
Social factors
most of the people use the traditional PC & instead they
use tablets for reading, social networking, playing
games, listening to music, watching video and for
email.
Personal Factors
Personal age
Occupation
Life style
Conclusion
A tablet pc mostly can attract the people who
At the age from teens to 50
With a life style looking for entertainment
Need for work or study
The market is developing
The need for brand and advertisement are
important
Direct analysis
Competitor
competitors
This market share of the competitors
including Samsung
It includes
Indirect
competitorsPCs,
Weakness
High price image.
Image- the Apple brand is not targeted
towards business people and does not have a
reputation as being compatible with the
corporate world
Not compactable with other system
Lack of customization
Threats
Fierce competition
Economic slow down & job less
Growing use of android platform
Company
analysis
SWOT analysis
STRENGTH
Advantage in design and multimedia features
Multitask management facility
WEAKNESS
Fewer suppliers than apple
Less marketing share in low end products
Boring advertisement
THREATS
New IPAD & MINIPAD
Individual demand
Price war
OTHERS
Digital age
High quality of life
Brand effect
Objective
To launch or come up with a new product,
HALO
Large
10.1 HD
widescre
en
Display
Android
3.0
Designed
for
Tablets
DualCore
1GHz
CPU
2MP
WebCam
8MP
Camera
1080p
Video
Capture &
Playback
Concept
Questionnair
e
Demographical
Occupation, students, businessman
Age-teens to fifty
House hold with income < 50k
Behavioral
Benefit sought
Profitability
Quality & speed
The need for study, working & entertainment
Value Proposition - I
Cinemati
c Hi-def
Experienc
e with
HDMI
Value Proposition - II
Front and
Rear
Facing
2MP/8MP
Camera
Universal
Web
Browsing
with
Adobe
Flash
Player
Value Proposition - IV
Higher
Productivit
y with
Seamless
Integration
to the
Cloud
Value Proposition - V
Bridging
the gap
with
traditional
PCs
4%
20%
Definitely would buy
24%
Priced @ $550
15%
9%
17%
30%
29%
CONCEPT
TESTING
Adjustments
PRODUCT 1
PRODUCT 2
Sample size
Price
Purchase intent
PI %
Weighted PI
(%)
PI %
Weighted PI
( %)
Definitely would
buy
20
5.7
17
4.6
Probably would
buy
42
7.1
29
4.7
24
1.8
30
2.1
Probably would
not buy
10
.6
15
.8
Definitely would
not buy
.2
.4
Overview
Total weighted PI
Product
Concept
15.4
Strategy
Launch
Plan 12.7
Marketing Strategy
Brand
Awareness
with unique
messaging
Promotion
Superior
distribution
channels
Place
Value
Price
Innovative
Product
Custom
er
Distribution
90%
80%
Distribution vs ACV
Internet; 8%
70%
Frys; 15%
60%
Best Buy; 10%
50%
Walmart; 15%
Target; 7%
Costco; 20%
Electronics; 25%
40%
30%
20%
10%
O
th
er
Fr
ys
Co
st
co
W
al
m
ar
t
0%
$50,000
Category Avg.
36%
18%
14%
9%
11%
11%
100%
% Dist.
46%
20%
20%
2%
0%
12%
100%
$70,000
Category Avg.
36%
18%
14%
9%
11%
11%
100%
Spend ('000)
$23,000
$10,000
$10,000
$1,000
$0
$6,000
$50,000
% Dist.
46%
20%
20%
2%
0%
12%
100%
$100,000
Category Avg.
36%
18%
14%
9%
11%
11%
100%
Spend ('000)
$32,200
$14,000
$14,000
$1,400
$0
$8,400
$70,000
% Dist.
46%
20%
20%
2%
0%
12%
100%
Spend ('000)
$46,000
$20,000
$20,000
$2,000
$0
$12,000
$100,000
Media Buy
Ad Spend Across Media Channels
50,000.00
45,000.00
40,000.00
35,000.00
30,000.00
25,000.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
0.00
Low
Medium
High
Trial Rate
# Units
Revenue
Ad Spend
Distr Spend
EBITDA=(reven
ue-expenses)
Low
0.33%
166 $
74,511.40
50,000.00
10,000.00
(19,604.78)
Medium
1.32%
662 $
298,045.60
70,000.00
30,000.00
62,580.89
High
2.32%
1,159 $
521,579.80
100,000.00
50,000.00
134,766.55
Trial Rate
# Units
Revenue
Ad Spend
Distr Spend
EBITDA
Low
0.18%
90 $
49,397.52
50,000.00
10,000.00
(29,565.21)
Medium
0.72%
359 $
197,590.09
70,000.00
30,000.00
22,739.15
High
1.26%
629 $
345,782.65
100,000.00
50,000.00
65,043.50
Tactics
Retail promotion
TV Advertising.
Print/Other advertising
Internet Ad
Radio Ad
Trade Promotion
Retailers
Launch Plan
Summary
Launch Date: June 25, 2015
Price point: $450
Units Manufactured: 1.15M
Color(s): 60% Silver (690K) 40% Black (460K)
Pilot: Nationwide Launch
Media Channel: Spread
Tagline: Premium Product, Value Pricing