Professional Documents
Culture Documents
layers
experiments and
by
models.
Tomas Walander, Alexander Eklind, Thomas
Carlberger, Ulf Stigh
Tamonash Jana
001411202019
Introduction
Generation of macroscopic cracks due to fatigue.
Adhesives
1. DOW
Betamate5096
(BM5096)
. A Rubber Based
Stiff Structural
Adhesive
.Epoxy Resin
.Nominal Layer
Thickness- 0.3
mm
2. DOW BetaForce
2850 (BF2850)
Polyurethane
(PUR) based
Adhesive
Soft modular
Adhesive
Nominal Layer
Thickness- 1 mm
Methodology
1st Approach - Paris law combined with the
Energy Release Rate G :
For a linear elastic specimen with a single crack tip
loaded with a prescribed load F
(1)
As suggested by Berry(1963)
(2)
p,q=Compliance calibration parameters
Now
(3)
(4)
Experiment
10
By repeated experiments, the static stressdeformation relations for Mode I loading are first
determined for each adhesive.
For the rubber adhesive, the method of
Andersson and Stigh (2004) is used; for the PUR
adhesive, the method of Tamuzs et al. (2004) is
used.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Conclusion
Fracture mechanics using Paris law provides
simpler parameter estimation than damage
mechanics approach.
The local modelling of fatigue damage using
damage
mechanics provides a more physical model of the
fatigue properties.
The experimental results contain substantial
scatter for the rubber based adhesive. Thus, a large
number of repeated experiments are necessary to
give useful data and properties.
23
Thank You
24