Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Trauma and Critical Care Symposium
Penrose-St. Francis Trauma Center
Colorado Springs May 2, 2013
Darren Malinoski, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
Oregon Health & Science University
ROADMAP
General definitions
History
Pathophysiology of muscle injury
Pathophysiology of renal injury
Diagnosis
Treatment strategies
Thresholds for treatment
Natural disasters
Research at LAC/USC and OHSU
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Etiologies
Release of cellular contents into the circulation
How to measure/quantify
Treatment?
MYOGLOBIN
CREATINE KINASE
COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
CRUSH SYNDROME
RENAL IMPACT
HISTORY OF
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
1880s: first reported in the German Literature
1911: Meyer-Betz described a clinical
syndrome consisting of dark brown urine,
muscle pain, and weakness
1941: Bywaters and Beall report 4 cases of
crush syndrome during the bombing of
London during WWII. They recognized the
association between swollen extremities,
hypovolemia, vaso-constriction, and eventual
oliguria / renal failure.
CAUSES OF
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Alcohol intoxication, immobility, compression
Positioning during surgery
Seizure disorders
Medications: steroids, paralytics
Toxins: alcohol, cocaine, insect bites, reptiles
Genetic Disorders
Infection: bacterial and viral
Trauma: Crush injury / Vascular Occlusion
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
MUSCLE INJURY
Immediate cell disruption
Direct pressure on muscles
Vascular compromise
Prolonged compression vs. vascular injury
Histologic changes at 2 hours
Necrosis at 6-8 hours
ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION
INJURY
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
RENAL INJURY
Hypovolemia and Shock
Myoglobinuria: when plasma concentration
exceeds 0.5-1.5 mg/dL, myoglobin filtered
into urine.
DIAGNOSIS
History
PEX
Labs:
TREATMENT
Prevention of Muscle Injury
Fasciotomy
Amputation
Prevention of Renal Injury
Dialysis
PREVENTION OF MUSCLE
INJURY
TREATMENT OF MUSCLE
INJURY
Fasciotomy
Controversies: indications and timing
compartment pressure >30-50mmHg
P <30 mmHg (diastolic minus compartment)
Amputation
FASCIOTOMY
Two incisions
Lateral incision:
Anterior compartment
Lateral / Peroneal compartment
Medial incision:
Posterior compartments
One incision
Lateral: all four compartments
PREVENTION OF RENAL
INJURY
Goal is to prevent rise in serum Cr and the
need for renal replacement therapy.
Treatment of shock and hypovolemia
PREVENTION OF RENAL
INJURY
Alkalinization of urine with NaHCO3- (K+)
Mannitol
Dopamine, acetazolamide, and Lasix
Experimental therapies:
Deferoxamine
PAF-receptor blockade
Bosentan endothelin receptor blockade
Anti-oxidants
Mannitol
Mannitol
Sodium Bicarbonate
TREATMENT THRESHOLD
SERUM CREATINE
KINASE LEVELS
$15
1-2 hour turnaround
Elimination T1/2: 42 hrs
More prevalent in the
literature - >3000 pts
Peak levels of 5000 to
75,000 risk ARD
All pts with increased
CK levels have positive
urine dipstick**
URINE OR SERUM
MYOGLOBIN LEVELS
$97
1-3 day turnaround
Elimination T1/2: 12 hrs
Studies with small
numbers - <300 pts
Most studies use urine
levels which are affected
by renal function
DIALYSIS
EARTHQUAKES AND
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
EARTHQUAKES AND
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
RECENT PUBLICATIONS
AND UNPUBLISHED DATA
FROM USC/LAC AND OHSU
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
AT OHSU
OBJECTIVE
To determine if the increase in
the treatment threshold from
CK 10,000 to 20,000 U/L
would lead to an increase in
ARD.
HYPOTHESIS:
A forced alkaline diuresis is
beneficial ONLY in patients
with a peak CK > 20,000 U/L.
Mannitol
Bicarbonate
METHODS
Retrospective review - 1/93 to 10/03
Selection criteria:
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Univariate analysis
Parametric data: Pearson Chi-square, Fishers
exact, or independent samples T-test
Non-parametric: Mann-Whitney U
Multivariate analysis:
Logistic regression analysis
All variables with p<0.2 on univariate analysis
included
RESULTS
N = 77
80
patients
77
included
CK <10K
21
CK 10-20K
6
3
excluded
CK 10-20K
16
CK >20K
34
Normal Cr = 16
Normal Cr = 3
Normal Cr = 14
Normal Cr = 20
ARD = 5
ARD = 3
ARD = 2
ARD = 14
ARF = 4
NO PROTOCOL
PROTOCOL*
dichotomized peak
creatinine
0-2.0
2.1-max
Total
Count
% within protocol
Count
% within protocol
Count
% within protocol
protocol
no protocol yes protocol
3
34
30.0%
73.9%
7
12
70.0%
26.1%
10
46
100.0%
100.0%
Total
37
66.1%
19
33.9%
56
100.0%
PROTOCOL COMPLICATIONS
STUDY CONCLUSIONS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
LATE FASCIOTOMIES
THANK YOU