You are on page 1of 27

Initial Data

Assessment of
I-Filed
Team 6

OUTLINE

Team Introduction

Project Objective

Gantt Chart & Current Status

Summary of Available Data

Geological Description

Petrophysical Analysis

Mobility Analysis

Fluid Properties Analysis

STOIIP Estimation & Reserve Calculation

TEAM INTRODUCTION

Highly skilled petroleum professionals in


various industry aspects:

HSS&E

Swarjit Samajpati

Technical

Moutaz Saleh

Onyeka Chukwudum

Economical

Vishnu Anand

Cesar Pinoargote

Abdul Saboor

Sarath Vincent

PROJECT OBJECTIVE

Develop the OPTIMUM full Field Development Plan for


I-Field

Covering all stages from Appraisal until Abandonment

GANTT CHART & CURRENT STATUS


Week 1
0

Week 2
7

Week 3
14

Week 4
21

Week 5
28

Week 6
35

Week 7
42

Week 8
49

Data Collection
Geological Description
Petrophysical Analysis
Fluid Properties
STOIIP & Reserve
Estimation
1st Milestone
Reservoir Modelling
Drilling Plan
Production Facilities
Economic Analysis
2nd Milestone
HSSE Strategy
Final Presentation &
Report

Project Submission

56

I-FIELD OVERVIEW

Located in UK sector of North Sea, Block 56

6 Appraisal Wells

Coordinates

51o 47 00 N
01o 44 00 E

SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE DATA


X1
Maps
Logs
RFT
Well Test

X2

X3

X5

X6

Top structure map with well locations + Digital Contours


Single seismic line passing through well X1

a
a

a
a

a
a

Core Data
PVT

X4

a a
a
a a
a
a a

Geological Description Contour Map


Y

Top Structure Map

4
6

1
3
2

Exploration Well Top


Reservoir Location
9800

Depth to Top Reservoir


(Feet Subsea)

2 Kms

GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
Structurally: A faulted anticline plunging in SE
Stratigraphically: Shaly Sand Limestone Chalk

PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS
X2

X1

X6

X5
1

2
3

X-X cross section

PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS
X3

X6

X4

Y-Y cross section

MOBILITY ANALYSIS

To determine WOC

X1
X2
X3
X5
Oil

Connectivity / Discontinuity

Water Main
Water East

Oil Gradient =

0.295 psi/ft

WOC =
10580

1
3
2

WOC = 10850

Water Gradient =

0.459 psi/ft

FLUID PROPERTIES ANALYSIS

Under-saturated oil

Initial Pressure = 5700 psia > Pb = 1785 psia

Tr = 260 F

Over-pressurized 0.54 psi/ft

bo = 1.32 rbbl/stb

Rs = 500 scf/stb

Oil Gravity = 40 API

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

High Wells Production Rate:

High PI:

8,000 25,000 BOPD


35 65 BOPD/psi

Good Permeability:

300 750 mD

Boundary Detected

Sealing Fault

KH (well test) comparable with


KH (core)

Layer Cake Reservoir

STOOIP & RESERVE ESTIMATION


STOOIP GRV * NTG * O * (1 Swi) / Bo
Gross Rock Volume:

Porosity:
Net to Gross Ration: LOGS

Contour Map + RFT

Formation Volume Factor:

LOGS

PVT Reports
Initial Water Saturation:

LOGS

RESERVES STOOIP* RF
Recovery Factor:

Drive Mechanism

Deterministic
for Reserve Calculation

Probabilistic
for STOOIP Calculation

DETERMINISTIC METHOD

PROBABILISTIC METHOD

Back-Up

PROPERTIES SUMMARY
Wells

NTG

Sw

Porosity

VShale

X-1

26

0.855

0.528

0.205

0.029

X-2

117

0.84

0.175

0.297

0.059

X-1

576

0.947

0.142

0.247

0.023

X-3

586

0.999

0.2

0.226

0.069

X-4

609

0.975

0.178

0.253

0.038

X-5

433

0.823

0.334

0.223

0.091

X-6

440

0.955

0.339

0.201

0.087

PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES
Property

Minimum

Mean

Maximum

623792

951716

1436845

NTG

0.195

0.455

0.716

12.7%

17.05%

21.4%

Sw

0.563

0.388

0.214

Bo

1.44

1.39

1.34

GVR
(acre-ft)

Distribution

VOLUME CALCULATIONS

ADDITIONAL DATA LIST


well X1

well X2

well X3

well X4

well X5

well X6

lab report

DST

core analysis

DST

well test report

core analysis

oil test
evaluation

pressure test
analysis
pressure gauge
production well
fluid analysis
report may 29
test report
1983
precision
high accuracy
pressure gauge
pressure measu
survey jun 17th
precision
static pressure
pressure gauge
survey
survey jun 23rd
core analysis

RFT

pvt report

BHP survey
production
summary

RFT

pressure gauge
report prod test
magnetic
bottom hole
recording
pressure report
pressure gauge
static pressure static pressure
survey
survey
RFT

deviation report
rel
pemeabilities

AVAILABLE LOGS
well X1

well X2

sonic log

density log

neutron
density log

neutron
density log

ISF/sonic log

sonic log

well X3

well X4

well X5

well X6

neutron
density log

neutron
density log

neutron
density log

neutron
density log

ISF/sonic log ISF/sonic log

dual laterolog dual laterolog dual laterolog dual laterolog dual laterolog
formation
tester

GR log

microlaterolog microlaterolog

microlaterolog microlaterolog

induction
sonic log

Horizontal Permeability vs Porosity


10,000.0

Horizontal Permeability, md

1,000.0

100.0

10.0

1.0

0.1

0.0
-

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Inerconnected Porosity
X1

X4

X5

Expon. (X 1)

Expon. (X 4)

Expon. (X 5)

35.0

Horizontal Permeability Log-LogDistribution

Horizontal Permeability Distribution


Horizontal Permeablility, md
0

1000

2000

3000

Horizontal Permeablility, md
4000

5000
10,200

0.1

10

100

1000

10000

10,400

10,600

10,800

Measured Depth, ft

11,000

X1
11,200

X5
X4

11,400

11,600

11,800

12,000

12,200

12,400

DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
Permeability(
md)

Skin

q(STB/day)

B(RB/STB)

m*

Ct(psi-1)

h(feet)

Area (ft2)

well X2

213.19

1.032

3781

1.41

0.27

0.97878

1.26E-05

130

2.14E+06

Well X3

188.4

-4.006

1.50E+04

1.34

0.25

1.86

1.22E-05

130

7.02E+06

Well X5

552.20

13.7

1.56E+04

1.44

0.23

0.0322

1.30E-05

295

4.96E+06

Well X6

177.8

34.62

1.50E+04

1.34

0.23

3.8352

1.08E-05

467

1.18E+06

BUILDUP ANALYSIS
Shape
Horner
factor(CA) time

tp(hrs) LTR Slope LTR/MTR PDMBH Pav(psia)

Distance
to fault

m*

P1hr

P*

Well X2

13.823

1.313

5663

5681

3.219

3.436

24.361

36.47

2.638

0.310

5679

457.48

Well X3

115.95

1.69

5107

5251

21.489

3.893

26.83

69.38

0.598

0.941

5203

403.33

Well X5

9.709

1.202

4291

4303

2.326

4.012

14.81

35.048

3.609

-0.246

4304

557.19

Well X6

32.56

3.454

4191

4227

3.936

2.190

12.06

227.64

6.990

0.400

4221

458.95

You might also like