Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Distribution Systems
Background
Will now consider pipe systems under
pressure flow
Water distribution systems
Sewer interceptors
Problems can be solved using:
Continuity equation
Steady-state energy equation
CEE 311Hydroscience
Continuity Equation
Between two points in the system,
continuity equation states that flows are
equal:
Q1 A 1V1 Q2 A 2 V2
CEE 311Hydroscience
2g
2g
Elevation Friction losses
Pressure Minor losses
Velocity
CEE 311Hydroscience
Definition of Terms
Hydraulic grade line (HGL)
Line depicting elevation of pressure
head + elevation head along the pipe
Energy grade line (EGL)
Line depicting elevation of total head
along the pipe
For uniform pipe, V1=V2 thus EGL is
parallel to HGL
CEE 311Hydroscience
hf
L
CEE 311Hydroscience
CEE 311Hydroscience
Chezy Equation
Recall the form of the Chezy equation:
V C RS
(10.11)
2
RC
dC2
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
In 1845, Darcy and Weisbach found a
corresponding model for pipe flow:
L V2
hf f
d 2g
(11.2)
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
Equating this to the Chezy formula, see
the relationship between Chezy
coefficient and the friction factor:
8g
f 2
C
or
8g
C
f
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
The friction factor depends on the flow
Different relationship for laminar and
turbulent flow
Recall that Reynolds number (Re)
can be used to define flow conditions:
Vd
Re
(11.3)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
For laminar flow (Re < 2000), friction
factor is a simple function of Re (64/Re)
For turbulent flow (Re > 4000), friction
factor is a function of Re and pipe
roughness
Pipe roughness determined from
equivalent sand roughness (e)
CEE 311Hydroscience
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
Based on experiments in the 1930s and
1940s, determined relationship between
friction factor and Re
Expressed in graphical form as the
Moody diagram
CEE 311Hydroscience
Moody Diagram
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
In 1976, Jain derived an empirical
relationship for the family of curves
presented in the Moody diagram:
e
5.72
2 log
0.9
3.7d Re
f
(11.8)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Minor Losses
To determine head losses due to pipe
fittings (bends, valves, transitions):
V2
hm K
2g
(11.12)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Darcy-Weisbach Equation
There are three main variables in the
Darcy-Weisbach equation: hf, d and
V(or Q)
Thus there are three main classes of
problems:
Compute hf given d and V
Compute V given d and hf
Compute d given hf and Q
CEE 311Hydroscience
Compute hf (given d, V)
Determine Re from V, d and (function
of temperature)
Determine f using either Moody
diagram or equation (laminar eqn or
Jain formula)
Compute hf directly from D-W equation
CEE 311Hydroscience
Hazen-Williams Equation
Another relationship for hf is commonly
used for pipe flow in water-supply
systems:
0.63 0.54
V 1.318CR S
(11.9)
Hazen-Williams Equation
For circular pipes, can substitute
V=Q/A, A=pd2/4, and R=d/4 to get
English
Metric
Q 0.432Cd2.63S0.54
(11.10a)
2.63 0.54
(11.10b)
Q 0.278Cd
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipes in Series
Consider a compound pipeline, with the
pipes in series:
Pipes in Series
For pipes in series, know that:
Q1=Q2==Qn
hf=hf1+hf2++hf3
If we assume a value of Q, can compute
individual losses
Setting this equal to loss for a single
pipe (diameter d), can solve for
equivalent length (Leq)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipes in Parallel
Consider a compound pipeline, with the
pipes in parallel:
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipes in Parallel
For pipes in parallel, know that:
hf=hf1=hf2==hf3
Q=Q1+Q2++Qn
If we assume a value of hf, can compute
individual discharges (Qi) for each pipe
Setting total loss for single pipe
(diameter d) equal to hf, can solve for
equivalent length (Leq)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipe Networks
Flow through pipe networks has
multiple paths
Solution techniques based on
corrections to assumed flows
Hardy-Cross method
Linear theory
Newton-Rhapson method
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipe Networks
For a valid solution, two conditions
must hold:
The algebraic sum of the pressure
drops around any closed loop must be
zero
The flow entering a junction must
equal the flow leaving it
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pipe Networks
Recall the Darcy-Weisbach and HazenWilliams formulas:
2
16 L Q
hf 2 f 5
p d 2g
4.727L 1.85
h f 1.85 4.87 Q
C d
Hardy-Cross Method
Method is based on successive
iterations
A flow is assumed in each pipe to satisfy
continuity
A correction to each flow is computed
based on pressure drops around closed
loops
CEE 311Hydroscience
Hardy-Cross Method
The pressure drop condition can be
written as
loop
KQ
0
n
loop
CEE 311Hydroscience
Hardy-Cross Method
Using a binomial expansion and
neglecting 2nd and higher order terms,
h f
loop
n h f Q a
(11.18)
loop
2g
2g
P1=P2
=Hp=DZ+hf+hm
DZ
22
2V 2 V
P1
V12 P2 P1
P
V
2 12 h h
Z
H p1 Z 2 Z1 p
hf f hmm
2
2g
2g2g
CEE 311Hydroscience
(11.14)
Pumps
There are many different types of
pumps
Closed radial
Open radial
Mixed flow
Propeller
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pumps
For design purposes, pumps are
selected based on performance
Performance parameters include:
Rotational speed
Discharge capacity
Pumping head
Power applied
Efficiency
CEE 311Hydroscience
Affinity Laws
For geometrically similar (homologous)
pumps, dimensional analysis produces
3
Q 2 N 2 D2
Q1 N1 D1
H 2 N 2 D2
H1 N1 D1
3
P2 N2 D2
P1 N1 D1
CEE 311Hydroscience
=DZ
0.81 LQ
H p DZ
f 5
g d
2
KQ
(11.31)
d4
CEE 311Hydroscience
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pump Characteristics
So far, weve assumed the efficiency (h)
of a pump is constant
In practice, for a given pump running at
a given speed, there are relationships
among Q, Hp, and h
The relationships are called the pump
characteristics or performance curves
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pump Characteristics
The pump characteristic curves are
experimentally derived
Generally shown as a function of Q
Pumping head (Hp)
Brake horsepower (P)
Efficiency (h)
CEE 311Hydroscience
Pump Systems
If we superimpose the system-head
curve with the pump-characteristic
curve, the intersection will determine
the operating point of the pump in the
system
If efficiency is too low, then select
another pump
CEE 311Hydroscience
Economics Review
In many cases, comparison of different
water-resources alternatives is difficult
due to differing types of costs, benefits
Economic analysis offers a basis for
comparison
There are 2 general bases for
comparison: money and time
CEE 311Hydroscience
Economics Review
The time to be considered will be one of the
following:
Economic life
Point where benefits < costs
Physical life
Analysis period
Planning horizon, generally less than
economic or physical life
Since projects have different lives and cash
flows, need to reduce to a common unit
CEE 311Hydroscience
and
FN
1 iN
CEE 311Hydroscience
Present worth of
a future sum
F
N
i,N 1 i
P
Future worth of a
present sum
CEE 311Hydroscience
A
A
P
1
2
1 i 1 i
1 iN
CEE 311Hydroscience
Present worth of
an annual series
A
i1 i
i,N
P
1 iN 1
Equivalent
annual series of a
present sum
CEE 311Hydroscience
Future worth of
an annual series
A
i
i,N
F
1 iN 1
Equivalent
annual series of a
future sum
CEE 311Hydroscience
Economic Analysis
With the discounting formulas, can put
projects on an equivalent basis in terms
of money and time
In practice, there are three approaches:
Present worth method
Benefit-cost ratio method
Net annual benefit method
CEE 311Hydroscience
Economic Analysis
Consider the choice between two projects:
Initial cost
Annual benefits
Project life
Discount rate
Project A
$50,000
$12,000
50 yrs
4%
Project B
$50,000
$12,500
25 yrs
4%
CEE 311Hydroscience