Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structure:
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Webers theory of Industrial location
5.2.1 Regional factors
5.2.2. Secondary causes.
5.2.3 Influence of Transport Cost
5.2.4 Influence of labor cost
5.2.5 Critical Appraisal of Webers theory
5.3 Sargent Florences Inductive Analysis
5.3.1 co-efficient of Localization
5.3.2 Location Factor
5.3.3 Critical Appraisal of Sargent Florences theory
5.4 August Loschs theory of industrial location
5.5 Summary
Objectives:
After studying this lesson, you will be able to understand
Meaning of industrial location
Factors for industrial location
Importance of different Location theories
5.1 Introduction:
Industrial location is a field of study that interests both economists and geographer,
because the location of industries is of particular importance in studying the internal
structure of regions and in many cases, guides the pattern of spatial development.
The theory of industrial location attempts to explain answers for three important
questions. They are;
Why the industries are located where they are
Why the locations are shifted,
And what can be the best location for a particular industry keeping in view the
resource endowments of different regions, transport network , existing demand,
potential demand etc.,
There are different versions developed by different economists on the theory of
industrial location. Each one of them tries to find out the reasons for industrial
location in an economy. Among them, the first attempt in developing a theory of
location was made by a German scholar, Von Thunen, in regard to agricultural
location. Thunen, considered the problem of location for various forms of agricultural
production in relation to markets.
Therefore, according to him, to achieve the maximum profit, they had to minimize
cost. It follows that a rational producer would choose a location where lowest
costs were incurred. This is the reason why Webers approach is known as the
least cost approach to the theory of industrial location.
M and N are two material sources and C is the consumption centre. The entire weight of
the material from M has to traverse a distance a and material N a distanceb to reach
the point of location T. the weight of the product has to move the distance C to reach the
consumption point. To determine where the location will actually lie, Weber calculates
the ratio between the weight of localized material and the weight of the product. This he
designates as the material Index. If the Index is less than one, the location is oriented
towards the consumption centre, while if the index is greater than one, the location is
material oriented.
The changes of location can take place only if the rise of cost of ton of
product which it causes is compensated, or more than compensated, by
savings of labor costs. A location can be moved from the point of minimum
transportation cost to more favorable labor location only if the savings in
the cost of labor which this new place makes possible and larger than the
additional costs of transportation which it involves.
5.2.5 Agglomerative and Deglomerative Factors:
Weber discusses the influence of agglomerative and deglomerative factors
on location of industry. The two tendencies of agglomeration and
deglomeration work in opposite direction and the final determination rests
on the side of greater economy. Here the technique of Isodapanes is applied
and agglomeration is supposed to take place whenever the saving in cost is
greater than the extra transport charges involved.
We are aware that Weber theory concentrated only on supply and cost
considerations and leaving out demand completely. In contrary to it, Losch theory
tended to neglect supply almost to the extent that Weber had neglected demand.
In his theory, therefore, Losch tried to incorporate demand by considering the size
of the market and maintained that the best location would be that which would
command the largest market area since this would bring in the highest sales
revenue.
Losch assumes an isotropic plane, that is a homogeneous land surface with an
evenly distributed population of self-sufficient farm households each having the
same tastes and similar technical capabilities; in short, a surface from which all
irregularities and non economic factors have been abstracted. He further assumes
identical production, identical demand curves for each buyer of each product, and
that transportation cost are proportional to distance. In such a situation, the
shape and size of market area will depend on the price of the product and the rate
of transport cost.
(Fig2)
Brewery, which at P (see fig 1); those living there will buy PQ bottles of beer. Further
away the price is higher by the amount of the frieght and the demand consequently
shrinks. When the weight costs are PF, the total price rises to OF and the demand
shrinks to zero. Thus PF will be the extreme sales radius for bear. By rotating the
triangle PQF on PQ as an axis we abstained the demand cone (see fig 2) whose
volume gives the total sales of the brewery at point P and thus denotes the market
area of brewery
It is possible that other farms may also produce surplus beer which they would
like to sell in the market. As long as profits are made, new breweries will come
to be established, each brewery having a circular market area.
As the number of breweries increase the circular areas touch other but even
now the whole space is not covered, and some area remains unnerved the only
possibility by which the total area can be covered is through overlapping circles
in the former cases, firms will continue to be set up to serve the unnerved
market while in the latter, consumers in the shaded region will choose a centre
that is nearest to them and leave others. Ultimately hexagons of the shapes are
formed.
The hexagonon form is the most efficient one since among all the possibilities
of utilizing the corners; the hexogon retains the most of the advantages of the
circle.
Each product will have a different network of market areas. When we
considered different products each having its own network of market area, we
can see the emergence of an economic region or landscape.
5.5 Summary
The theory of industrial location attempts to explain answers for three important
questions. They are; Why the industries are located where they are, Why the locations
are shifted, And what can be the best location for a particular industry keeping in view
the resource endowments of different regions, transport network , existing demand,
potential demand etc.,
The first comprehensive effort at developing a theory of location was made by Alfred
Weber. Webers theory is to be considered as a deductive theory. And he emphasized
the cost factors in affecting the location of industry. He assumed competitive pricing (a
situation where individual firms were powerless to influence the price of their product
which was the same everywhere). Therefore, according to him, to achieve the maximum
profit, they had to minimize cost. It follows that a rational producer would choose a
location where lowest costs were incurred. This is the reason why Webers approach is
known as the least cost approach to the theory of industrial location.
Sergeant Florences mode of analysis is inductive in character. On account of the very
tangible results it yields regarding the trends of industrial distribution, Florences analysis
has acquired great popularity. Sargent Florence has introduced two new concepts in the
theory of location, namely Location Factor and Co-efficient of Localization
August Losch tried to incorporate demand by considering the size of the market and
maintained that the best location would be that which would command the largest
market area since this would bring in the highest sales revenue.
5.8
Self-Assessment Questions