World EME Industry in 1981 About CAT CATs strategy till 1980s Competition Need for new strategy PESTEL Analysis Michael Porters Five Forces Model SWOT Analysis Suggestions and Key Learning AGENDA 1981, the construction industry along with EME usage represented nearly 70% of the total dollar sales Excavators, bulldozers, graders, loaders of highway tractors and haulers EME demand was doubling throughout 1973-1980s Mining/ construction industry 60% of EME market Low cost labour method created competition EME industry focussed on improvements to existing products
WORLD EME INDUSTRY IN 1981 Based in Peoria, Illinois Two divisions 1) Earth moving and construction machinery and related equipments 2) Engines for construction and power generating systems. Largest manufacturer of EME- Large geographical base and broad product line Great success due to world war II triple sales
ABOUT CAT Extending its market globally plants in over 8 countries Providing high quality extensive product line backed by efficient service Self-sustaining Dealership Network 100 % ownership of its subsidiaries Recognizing post-war opportunities Manufacturing excellence & Quality Control Uniform pricing strategy Hired employees mostly from the US
CATS STRATEGY TILL 1980s 53% 15% 10% 6% 7% 5% 4% Market Share (%) Caterpillar Komatsu J.I. CASE FIAT-ALLIS JOHN DEERE INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPETITION TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR MORE THAN 90% OF THE SALES. Worldwide demand had doubled Intensity of competition increased LDCs increased their rate of construction activity Saturation in domestic market World contractors were becoming better placed than US contractors to perform contract Hardships due to enormous labour union strikes
NEED FOR NEW STRATEGIES Healthy environment in home country, USA World War 2 provided heavy growth opportunities for EME Industry. Entry in Japan was under strict constraints: Caterpillar - Mitsubishi alliance was delayed till Komatsu was in strategic alliance with Cummins over licensing. Governments of Countries like India, African nations stressed on partial manufacturing within national borders. Joint Ventures: Caterpillar established subsidiaries in host countries to get best deals with Governments to reduce their tax liabilities. Political Joint Ventures and Risk Reduction Subsidiaries with 100% or maximum possible ownership Higher wages of Employees and Workers in developed markets reduced the Profit margins for Organization, further pushing organizations to raise premium in Pricing. Excessive Inventory Storage had associated carrying cost which further pushed price higher.
Economical Environment Depleting market in Middle East. Softening of Oil Prices led to low construction activity.
Global Debt Crisis of 1981. LDCs Mexico, brazil, Argentina, Nigeria facing liquidity crunch.
Fed Reserve Policy leading to higher interest rates affected the Construction industry.
Strengthening USD, adverse for Exports from US. Economical Environment Developing Countries and specifically the African nations were more Labor oriented.
Organizations stressed high on loyalty were considered Conventional in operations.
Ghetto creations( Clubbing housing and working localities) observed.
Management- Labor Relations in Organizations were challenged.
Social Environment During War, US military standardized usage of CAT equipments. Technology development and increase in Automation - Result: electronically controlled equipment. Post war, US military left heavy machinery in countries while their return. This led to locals learning usage and maintenance of Cat machinery. However Caterpillar was mocked to have laid back Technology as compared to Komatsu.
Technological Environment Opportunities seen in ASEAN, Australia, Japanese markets.
Other MNCs ready to take dealership of CAT in and outside US. Ex: Unilever in Africa.
Ecological Environment USFCPA: US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act- Prohibited Caterpillar from unethical activities like Bribery.
Different Nations varied on the Legal standards adopted for Business. Joint Ventures with percentage of Ownership was point of focus.
Tax policies depended on ownership and Investments.
Legal Environment MICHAEL PORTERS FIVE FORCES MODEL Rivalry High Threat of new entrants Low Bargaining power of buyers Moderate Threat of substitute products Low Bargaining power of suppliers Moderate SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTHS Dealership network Broad product line Large Geographic Base Operational efficiency High quality products
WEAKNESS Fewer markets Few global managers High Overheads and setup cost Labour Relations
OPPORTUNITIES Emerging markets Diversification
THREATS Competition Uncertain Economic environment Currency fluctuation Improve labour relations and maintain harmony with the united auto workers union.
Use different marketing channels.
Set up manufacturing plants in emerging economies to reduce transportation costs and thus to reduce the price. SUGGESTIONS Hire local employees with local knowledge to work in a particular country.
Concentrate on growing markets far east, Australia, ASEAN countries, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan
Full capacity utilization of existing plants to reduce overheads
SUGGESTIONS Increase emphasis on mining side of the business.
Support customer relationships through repair and maintenance scheduling.
Provide rental and lease facilities for equipment.
Develop relations with other manufacturers and equipment designers SUGGESTIONS THANK YOU!