Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF
Guide By
Prof. G.N. Patel Chirag N. Patel
(06 MCL 011)
FLOW OF PRESENTATION
§INTRODUCTION
§OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
§LITERATURE REVIEW
§ SCOPE OF WORK
§ HYDRODYNAMIC PRESSURE CALCULATION
§ DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
§ ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF TANK,
- CONTAINER
- STAGING
- FOUNDATION
§ CONCLUSION
§ REFERENCES
2
INTRODUCTION
§ So, rather than construct two or more storage tanks it is quite economical
to construct large size storage tank with two or multi compartments.
3
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
§
§ The mainthe
During objective of the some
earthquake study isoftothe
understand the behaviour
tanks failed. of
Up till now
the multi compartmental
hydrostatic effect of watertank during
is been earthquake
considered, butand how
during
to consider hydrodynamic
earthquakes the hydrodynamic effectpressure
of waterforplays
seismic
an
analysis,
importantvarious
role. parameters affecting it and how to take care
of those parameters so as to achieve safety as well as
economy.
§ Moreover, Indian seismic code IS 1893:1984 has not been
revised since so long and draft code is recently circulated.
4
LITERATURE REVIEW
§ Yu Tang et
IITK-GSDMA
S.C.Dutta A al.
simplified
Guidelines procedure
for Seismic
Authors aims for Design
to estimate computing thevariation
of Liquid
the range of dynamic
Storageof
response
torsional of lateral
Tanks Provisions
to flexible withtanks containing
commentary
natural period ratioandtwo forliquids
explanatory
usually under a lateral
examples.
constructed
§ base motion
reinforced of arbitrary
concrete temporary
elevated water variation
tanks with is proposed.
frame-type It
§ requires
Sajjad Sameer
staging theassessing
for input
et al. of ground
In their acceleration
this torsional
paper procedure
vulnerability.inis the rigid form
proposed
Closed tank
for
solutions
analysis of
expressions to be
for replaced
tank. The shear
torsional by
andthe inpseudo
thestiffness
lateral acceleration
columns of are function
tankobtained
staging
corresponding
assuming
are derivedthat and ittois the fundamental
proportional
verified by standardto themode ofelement
distance
finite vibration of the
of thesoftware.
column
tank-liquid
from bending
Closed form system.
axis of
expressions Thisthesimple
staging procedure
for moments and taking andis into
an extension
shear account
forcesthe of
the
shiftmethod
columns andused
in inflectionbeams for under
point the
in theevaluation
end panels
torsion of response
and dueunder
that to the quantities
flexibility
lateral for
of
force
flexible
girders.
are tanks
alsoThe restwith
derived. Itonly
of the one liquid.
isunknown
also forces
seen The
are the
with effect
computedhelpof of the soil-
by these
using
structure
equationsinteraction
expressions of the
thatstatictheonequilibrium
the response
frame stagingand of quantities
by assuming
these can
tanks thebe taken
location
normally
into
of theaccount.
designed points ofOnly
for seismic the
inflection.
lateralimpulsive
The method
force, component
may yield by of
proposed response
gives
formation goodof
quantities
plastic are considered
results ifhinges
staging consists in
simultaneously of the proposed
columns
in all equally
columnsapproach,
spaced
instead since
overof the
in
convective
periphery.
beams. component
The axial force can be in computed
columns and by considering
design-bending both
§ the tank and
moment its supporting
in bracings mediumby
are obtained to the
be rigid.
proposed method, by
§§ the finite element procedure and by the normal convectional
method (stiffness matrix method) and than comparison is done.
§
§ 5
SCOPE OF WORK
6
Kc/2 Kc/2
mc
mi hc mc
hi
Kc
mi + ms
hs
mi + ms
7
Resultant of impulsive pressure
on wall
(Impulsive Mode)
h *i
hi
(Convective Mode)
h*c
hc
8
ONE COMPARTMENT
TWO COMPARTMENT
THREE COMPARTMENT
RECTANGULAR CIRCULAR
9
As per Draft Code 1893 (II)
10
PLAN
RECTANGULAR TANK
Required Capacity Length (m) Width (m) Height (m) Actual Capacity
of Tank (m3) of Tank (m3)
W =
5 . 70 m
W = 11 . 70
m
W =
5 . 70 m
L = L = 17 . 70
17 . 70 m m
W 2 = 5 . 70
m
W 1 = 5 . 70
m
L1 = L2 =
11
11 . 70 m 5 . 70 m
CIRCULAR TANK
Required Capacity Diameter Height (m) Actual Capacity
of Tank (m3) (m) of Tank (m3)
D = D1 =
16 . 50 m 16 . 70 m
D2 =
11 . 70 m
D3 = D 1 = 16 . 70
12 . 70 m m
12
D2 = 8.0
Other data assumed for the example is as shown below.
•Shape of container :Rectangular & Circular
•Capacity of tank :1000 m3
•Type / Height of staging :Trestle / 15 m
•Shape of column :Circular
•Width of brace :300 mm
•Depth of brace :500 mm
•Diameter of column :350 mm
•Depth of foundation :3.0 m
•Soil Type :Soft Soil
•Grade of concrete :M 25
•Grade of steel :Fe 415
•Permissible compressive stress in concrete :6 N/mm2
•Permissible compressive stress in steel :150 N/mm2
•Zone : IV
13
Impulsive Mode Convective Mode
Base Shear
( )(
V = A m +m g
i hi i s
) V = A
c hc c
( )( )
m g
V = V2 + V 2
i c
Base Moment
i
( )
M = A m h * + h + m h g
h i i i s s cg
M
c
( h )c mc hc* + hs g
= A
M = M 2 +M 2
i c
14
RECTANGULAR TANK
No. of Compartment Base Shear (V) kN Base Moment (M) kNm
CIRCULAR TANK
No. of Compartment Base Shear (V) kNBase Moment (M) kNm
15
BASE SHEAR
10.34%
2.07%
0%
10.21%
0% 5.61%
16
BASE MOMENT
0% 1.66% 11.46%
12.28%
7.64%
0%
17
L
L
m tanh 0.866
i = h
mi mc m
0.866
L
h
L
i
( )(
V = A m +m g
hi i s
)
V = ( A ) (m )g
mi mc
== c hc c
m +m
T = 2Π i s
L1 L2 i K
s
mi mc
m
T = c
c K
c
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
§TIME PERIOD
§BASE SHEAR
Comparison Between,
19
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Convective mass
Impulsive mass
20
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
21
CIRCULAR TANK
22
RECTANGULAR TANK
23
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
Rectangular Circular
24
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
STAADPRO 2007
25
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
STAADPRO 2007
26
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
STAADPRO 2007
27
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
28
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
Design Summary for container wall (Rectangular Tank)
Roof slab
Thickness 170 mm
Container wall
Thickness 300 mm
Bottom slab
Thickness 300 mm
30
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF CONTAINER
Design Summary for container wall (Circular Tank)
Roof slab
Thickness 200 mm
Container wall
Thickness 300 mm
Bottom slab
Thickness 200 mm
32
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF STAGING
33
STAGING MODEL ( RECTANGULAR TANK )
Frame
Frame
Frame
Frame
Frame
Frame
Fram
eA
D
B
G
E
F
3 3 3 3 3 3
m m m m m m
C C C C C C C Frame
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 5
9 0 1 2 3 4 5 3
C C C C C C C m Frame
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4
2 3 4 5 6 7 3
8
C m Frame
C C C C C C
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3
5 6 7 8 9 0 3
1
C C C C C C C m Frame
8 9 1 1 1 1 1 3 2
0 1 2 3 4
C C C C C C C m Fram
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e1
34
STIFFNESS OF STAGING
P
Stiffness K =
Δ
STAADPRO 2007
35
APPLICATION OF WIND LOAD
As per IS 875 (Part-3) Draft
STAADPRO 2007
36
LOADING ON STAGING FOR ANALYSIS
STAADPRO 2007
37
TORSIONAL ANALYSIS OF STAGING
W2 = 5.70
m
e
W1 = 5.70
m
L1 = 11.70 m L2 = 5.70 m
38
Application of Direct Loading for Staging Analysis
817 . 46
kN
STAADPRO 2007
39
STAGING DISPLACEMENT
Due to Loading Eccentricity
.
Eq
EL ± 0.3EL
x
− EL ± 0.3EL
y
Rotation
x y
sion
res
p
m
Tension Co
40
Design Summary For Staging Column & Brace
Column
Brace
41
Structural Detailing for Staging Column & Brace
X X
P1
P2
43
Design Summary For Foundation
Rectangular Tank foundation
Reinforcement for raft slab 12mm @ 240c/c both way
Circular Tank foundation
Outer diameter of raft slab 21.3 m
Soil pressure 160 kN/m2
Overhang portion ‘x’ for raft slab 2.0 m
Depth of raft slab 450 mm
Reinforcement for raft slab 25mm @ 240c/c as radial and
20mm @ 250c/c as Circumferential
44
Structural Detailing for Foundation (Rectangular Tank)
45
Structural Detailing for Foundation (Circular Tank)
47
PARAMETRIC STUDY
§RECTANGULAR TANK
Comparison Between,
§CIRCULAR TANK
Comparison Between,
18.00 m
12.00 m
18.00 m
12.00 m
The same type of study considering different capacity and shape of tank.
Different types of foundation can be studied to give different end
conditions.
One can also study the effect of container compartments on different
type of staging configuration.
Dynamic analysis of compartmental tank with soil structure interaction.
It can also be studied for shaft type staging and a comparison can be
made for economy and suitability with bracing type staging.
It can also be studied using steel precast staging and compared with the
present study.
It can also be studied by providing base isolation.
58
PAPER COMMUNICATED
• Chirag N. Patel and G.N.Patel, “Seismic Analysis of Elevated Tank with
Multiple Compartments As Per IS: 1893 Draft Code (Part-2)”, National
Seminar on Recent Trends in Geotechnical and Structural Engineering
(RTGSE-2007), Jaipur, 22-23 December 2007.
59
REFERENCES
•IITK-GSDMA Guidelines for Seismic Design of Liquid Storage Tanks
Provisions with commentary and explanatory examples.
•IS 11682:1985, “Criteria for Design of RCC Staging for Overhead
Water Tanks”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
•IS 3370 (part-1) Draft, “Code of Practice for Concrete Structures for
the Storage of Liquid – General requirements”, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
•IS 1893:1984, “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
•IS 875 (part-3): “Wind loads on Buildings and Structures, -Proposed
Draft and Commentary”, IITK-GSDMA.
•IS 456:2000, “Plain and Reinforced Concrete, - Code of Practice”,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
•IS 875 (part-3):1987, “Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than
earthquake) for Buildings and Structures, - wind load”, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi.
•IS 1893 (part-1):2002, “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures, - General Provisions and Buildings”, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
60
REFERENCES
An Explanatory Handbook on IS 875 (part 3), Wind loads on Buildings and
Structures, IITK-GSDMA.
Jain,O.P., Prakash Ananad, Singh K.K., & Saxena S.P.," Estimation Of Materials
And Cost Of Optimum Design Of Intze Tanks", Indian Concrete Journal, June,
1979.
Jain, O.P. & K.K Singh, "Computer Analysis of Intze Tanks ", Indian Concrete
Journal, August, 1977.
Jain L.K. & Choube O.M.," Rapid Method of Estimating Deflections Of Tower Of
Overhead Tanks "Indian Concrete Journal, Oct-1980.
P.Dayaratnam, Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Vol-2, Ninth Edition,
Oxford & IBH Publications, 2004.
Jai Krishna and O.P.Jain, Plain and Reinforced Concrete Structures Vol-2, Fifth
Edition, New chand & Bros., 2003.
S.Ramamrutham and R.Narayan, Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures,
Twelfth Edition, Dhanpat Rai & Sons, 2004.
Jain A.K., "Reinforced Concrete Limited State Design", Nem Chand & bros
rookie, 2002
Yu Tang, “Dynamic Response of Tank containing two liquids”, Journal of
Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, March-1993, Vol-125,No. 3 Pg-531.
•
61
THANK
YOU
ALL
62