Exocrine Stimulation The more proximal the nutrient infusionthe greater the pancreatic stimulation (dog studies) - stomach maximal stimulation - duodenum intermediate stimulation - jejunum minimal / negligible stimulation Elemental formulas tend to cause less stimulation than standard intact formulas - intact protein > oligopeptides > free amino acids Intravenous nutrients (even lipids) do not appear to stimulate the pancreas
Protective Measures COMPARTMENTALIZATION - digestive enzymes are contained within zymogen granules in acinar cells REMOTE ACTIVATION - digestive enzymes are secreted as inactive proenzymes within the pancreas PROTEASE INHIBITORS trypsin inhibitor is secreted along with the proenzymes to suppress any premature enzyme activation AUTO SHUT-OFF trypsin destroys trypsin in high concentrations
Acute Pancreatitis Definition Acute inflammatory process involving the pancreas Usually painful and self-limited Isolated event or a recurring illness Pancreatic function and morphology return to normal after (or between) attacks
autodigestion of pancreatic tissue release of enzymes into the circulation activation of white blood cells local complications local vascular insufficiency premature enzyme activation distant organ failure Acute Pancreatitis Pathogenesis
Acute Pancreatitis Time Course 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 hours from pain onset ER presentation cytokine release organ failure
Predictors of Severity Why are they needed? - appropriate patient triage & therapy - compare results of studies of the impact of therapy When are they needed? - optimally, within first 24 hours (damage control must begin early) Which is best?
Severity Scoring Systems Ranson and Glasgow Criteria (1974) - based on clinical & laboratory parameters - scored in first 24-48 hours of admission - poor positive predictors (better negative predictors) APACHE Scoring System - can yield a score in first 24 hours - APACHE II suffers from poor positive predictive value - APACHE III is better at mortality prediction at > 24 hours Computed Tomography Severity Index - much better diagnostic and predictive tool - optimally useful at 48-96 hours after symptom onset
Ranson Criteria Alcoholic Pancreatitis AT ADMISSION 1. Age > 55 years 2. WBC > 16,000 3. Glucose > 200 4. LDH > 350 IU/L 5. AST > 250 IU/L
WITHIN 48 HOURS 1. HCT drop > 10 2. BUN > 5 3. Arterial PO2 < 60 mm Hg 4. Base deficit > 4 mEq/L 5. Serum Ca < 8 6. Fluid sequestration > 6L Number Mortality <2 1% 3-4 16% 5-6 40% 7-8 100%
Glasgow Criteria Non-alcoholic Pancreatitis 1. WBC > 15,000 2. Glucose > 180 3. BUN > 16 4. Arterial PO2 < 60 mm Hg 5. Ca < 8 6. Albumin < 3.2 7. LDH > 600 U/L 8. AST or ALT > 200 U/L
CT Severity Index appearance normal enlarged inflamed 1 fluid collection 2 or more collections grade A B C D E score 0 1 2 3 4 necrosis none < 33% 33-50% > 50% score 0 2 4 6 score morbidity mortality 1-2 4% 0% 7-10 92% 17% Balthazar et al. Radiology 1990.
Severe Acute Pancreatitis Scoring systems - 3 Ranson criteria - 8 APACHE II points - 5 CT points Organ failure - shock (SBP < 90 mmHg) - pulmonary edema / ARDS (PaO 2 < 60 mmHg) - renal failure (Cr > 2.0 mg/dl) Local complications - fluid collections pseudocysts - necrosis (mortality 15% if sterile, 30-35% if infected) - abscess
Treatment of Mild Pancreatitis Pancreatic rest Supportive care - fluid resuscitation watch BP and urine output - pain control - NG tubes and H 2 blockers or PPIs are usually not helpful Refeeding (usually 3 to 7 days) - bowel sounds present - patient is hungry - nearly pain-free (off IV narcotics) - amylase & lipase not very useful here
Treatment of Severe Pancreatitis Pancreatic rest & supportive care - fluid resuscitation* may require 5-10 liters/day - careful pulmonary & renal monitoring ICU - maintain hematocrit of 26-30% - pain control PCA pump - correct electrolyte derangements (K + , Ca ++ , Mg ++ ) Rule-out necrosis - contrasted CT scan at 48-72 hours - prophylactic antibiotics if present - surgical debridement if infected Nutritional support - may be NPO for weeks - TPN vs. enteral support (TEN)
Role of ERCP Gallstone pancreatitis - Cholangitis - Obstructive jaundice Recurrent acute pancreatitis - Structural abnormalities - Neoplasm - Bile sampling for microlithiasis Sphincterotomy in patients not suitable for cholecystectomy
Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis Metabolic stress - catabolism & hypermetabolism seen in 2/3 of patients - similar to septic state (volume depletion may be a major early factor in the above derangements) Altered substrate metabolism - increased cortisol & catecholamines - increased glucagon to insulin ratio - insulin resistance Micronutrient alterations - calcium, magnesium, potassium, etc
Reduced Oral Intake in Acute Pancreatitis Abdominal pain with food aversion Nausea and vomiting Gastric atony Ileus Partial duodenal obstruction
Factors Differentiating Mild from Severe Pancreatitis Parameter Mild Pancreatitis Severe Pancreatitis Admissions 80% 20% Pancreatic necrosis No Yes Oral diet within 5 days 80% 0% Morbidity 8% 38% Mortality 3% 27%
TPN in Acute Pancreatitis delay until volume repleted & electrolytes corrected check triglycerides first goal <400 lipids are OK to use (possible exception of sepsis) monitor glucose levels carefully - can see insulin insufficiency and resistance - may need to limit calories at first - separate insulin drip may be needed
TPN in Acute Pancreatitis Benefit or harm? - early uncontrolled studies suggested benefit - two retrospective studies (70s & 80s) showed no benefit with TPN in pancreatitis - 1987 randomized study of early TPN vs. IVF alone showed more sepsis, longer stays, & no fewer complications with TPN When to use TPN? - jejunal access is unavailable - ileus prevents enteral feeding - patients in whom TEN clearly exacerbates pancreatitis
Enteral Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis studies - late 80s patients who received jejunal feeding tubes at the time of surgery, did well with early post-op enteral support - 1991 randomized study of early TPN vs. early TEN post-op showed no short-term difference - 1997 early TPN vs. early TEN (Peptamen) via nasojejunal tube in 32 patients showed no difference except 4x less cost & less hyperglycemia - 1997 similar study showed fewer complications and lower cost without change in length of stay - 1998 similar study showed more sepsis and organ failure in the TPN group
McClave et al. 1997 Kalfarenztos et al. 1997 Windsor et al. 1998 No of patients 32 38 34 Etiology EtOH 19/32 - - Biliary 23/34 Severe pancreatitis 19% 100% 38% Enteral formula Semi-elemental Semi-elemental Polymeric Cost 5x less 3x less - - Outcome No difference Fewer comp Less SIRS Summary of Prospective RCTs Enteral vs Parenteral Nutrition for Acute Pancreatitis
Total Enteral Nutrition in Severe Pancreatitis may start as early as possible - when emesis has resolved - ileus is not present nasojejunal route preferred over nasoduodenal likely decreases risk of infectious complications by reducing transmigration of colonic bacteria
Conclusions Acute pancreatitis is a self-limited disease in which most cases are mild. Gallstones and alcohol are the leading causes of acute pancreatitis. In mild pancreatitis, nutritional support is usually not required In severe pancreatitis, nutritional support will likely be required with the enteral route preferred over TPN because of both safety and cost.