Professional Documents
Culture Documents
<logo>
HEMOCRITE
Tim Wainwright
Mitch Pender
Jan Sorenson
Feargal Brady
Agenda
14% 600
12%
10%
400 Sales (€M)
8% EBITDA
300 EBIT
6%
200
4%
2% 100
0% 0
2000 2001 2002 2003 E 2004 E 2005 E
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004 4
Revenue by Market
Asia-Pacific
12%
US
6%
France
44%
EU other
17%
Breakdown of
UK 2002
21% consolidated
sales.
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004
Total = €520 5
Balance Sheet
(in € millions) 2002 %
Assets
-Intangible fixed assets € 103 40%
-Investments & financial assets € 17 7%
-Tangible fixed assets € 113 44%
-Working capital requirements € 23 9%
Total Assets € 256 100%
Sh Equity & Liabilities
-Shareholders equity € 207 81%
-Net financial debt € 34 13%
-Provisions € 14 5%
-Minority interests €1 0%
Total Sh Eq & Liab € 49 19%
• PAST –- Since
At origin
1992,
of major
Streamlined focused market
structure ondeveloped
acquiring
evolutions
& of
established
free-press
being inbusiness
UK, Spain
implemented in Thailand,
& BelgiumMexico, China
including
•Belgium (Centralization)
•FUTURE•Spain
- Positioned
– Ongoing product
(Reduction to in
take renewal
advantage
sales process
offices) of high
growth
and •countries
extensive databases
– Italy, Hungary
UK (Reorganisation of of
client and
needs
sales Czech
and will
maint)
Rep.
enable continued growth 2. Product
3. Reorganisation
Innovation
•FUTURE – Profit enhancement opportunities
HEMOCRITE
Management Unique
Experience Know-how
Earnings Sales
Growth Growth
Valuation Methods
DCF Valuation
(€Millions)
CASE1. As per Hemocrite Projections
2003 E 2004 E 2005 E
Net Sales 565 594 622
EBIT 39 49 61
Interest 2 2 2
EBT 37 48 59
Taxes 15 19 24
Net Income 22 29 36
Plus Dep'n 15 15 15
Cash Flow 37 43 50
Retention for growth 15 15 15
Plus Horizon Value 594
Net Cash to acquirer 22 29 629
• Alternative Valuations:
– Zero Growth = €248m
The Buyers
The Buyers
• Four Types of Merger
Firm A Firm B
Product A Product A
– 2. Vertical Merger
Firm A
Product A Firm AB
Firm B Product Aa
Product a
Horizontal Congeneric
Merger Merger
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004 15
The Buyers
Motivation for Group C to purchase Hemocrite
(Horizontal Merger)
• Strong Growth Perspective YES
• Synergy 1: Economies of Scale YES
• Synergy 2: Financial Economics YES
• Synergy 3: Tax Effect (YES)
• Synergy 4: Increased Market Power YES
• Complementary resources YES
• Managers` Personal Incentives ?
• Diversification of its Portfolio NO
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004 16
The Buyers
Motivation for Group D to purchase Hemocrite
(Congeneric Merger)
• Strong Growth Perspective YES
• Synergy 1: Economies of Scale (YES)
• Synergy 2: Financial Economics (YES)
• Synergy 3: Tax Effect YES
• Synergy 4: Increased Market Power (YES)
• Complementary resources (YES)
• Managers` Personal Incentives ?
• Diversification of its Portfolio YES
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004 17
22/11/09 Hemocrite - June 2004 18
What form of
negotiation
Negotiation Objectives
• Hemocrite Objectives:
– Price
• Maximise transaction value
• Minimise restrictions, representatives & warranties
– Other
• Minimise disruption to operations
• Guarantee a successful result
• Ensure confidentiality is maintained
– inviting the shark to dinner
Auction is recommended
• Based on number and quality of potential buyers (recent
MBO in competitor company, appetite for consolidation)
• Potential to lure 1 or 2 into private negotiations, pre-auction
and heighten interest
• Essential to obtain management buy-in to ensure positive
image and knowledge transfer