This document discusses different methods for designing bituminous mixes, including the Marshall and Superpave methods. It provides details on the Marshall method, including definitions of terms, properties evaluated, and limitations. The Superpave method aims to address limitations of the Marshall method by evaluating fundamental properties like fatigue resistance. Key aspects of the Superpave method include material selection criteria, design aggregate structure, restricted zones for gradation control, and evaluation of moisture susceptibility. The Marshall method remains commonly used due to its simplicity but does not guarantee long-term pavement performance achieved by the Superpave method.
This document discusses different methods for designing bituminous mixes, including the Marshall and Superpave methods. It provides details on the Marshall method, including definitions of terms, properties evaluated, and limitations. The Superpave method aims to address limitations of the Marshall method by evaluating fundamental properties like fatigue resistance. Key aspects of the Superpave method include material selection criteria, design aggregate structure, restricted zones for gradation control, and evaluation of moisture susceptibility. The Marshall method remains commonly used due to its simplicity but does not guarantee long-term pavement performance achieved by the Superpave method.
This document discusses different methods for designing bituminous mixes, including the Marshall and Superpave methods. It provides details on the Marshall method, including definitions of terms, properties evaluated, and limitations. The Superpave method aims to address limitations of the Marshall method by evaluating fundamental properties like fatigue resistance. Key aspects of the Superpave method include material selection criteria, design aggregate structure, restricted zones for gradation control, and evaluation of moisture susceptibility. The Marshall method remains commonly used due to its simplicity but does not guarantee long-term pavement performance achieved by the Superpave method.
2 Objective To understand What are the mix design methods. Marshall method of mix design. Limitations of Marshall method Superpave mixes Importance of other methods
3 Mix design Objective: To determine an economical blend of aggregates (gradation within the limits of project specifications), and asphalt that yields a mix of having? Sufficient asphalt to ensure a durable pavement Sufficient stability to satisfy the demands of traffic without distortion or displacement Sufficient voids in the total compacted mix to allow secondary compaction and temperature variations. Sufficient workability for efficient placement without segregation.
4 Various methods of mix design Marshall Method Hveem Method Refusal Density Method Superpave method Film Thickness Method Etc.
Mix design contd
5 Definitions: Bulk Specific Gravity (Gsb) Apparant Specific Gravity (Gsa) Effective Specific Gravity (Gse) Marshall Method
6
Specific gravity :
Voids absorbed bitumen Marshall Method contd
7 Solid rock Vr Water permeable porosity but not filled by bitumen Vw
8 Definitions: Stability (60 O c, 30 min, 50.8 mm/min) Flow Air Voids Voids Filled with Bitumen Voids in Mineral Aggregates Percentage of absorbed asphalt Marshall Method contd
9 Vse Va Mineral Aggregate Asphalt Air voids Vsb Vma Vfa Vba Vb Vmm Vmb Phase Diagram : BC-ID 9 for presentation.xls Marshall Method contd
10 Marshall Method contd
11 1. PROPERTIES OF INGREDIENTS Individual gradation of aggregate Other properties of aggregate Properties of bitumen
See sheet properties of aggr. bit in BC-ID 9 for presentation.zip Marshall Method contd
12 2. BLENDING (HOT & COLD)
See sheet blend cold & blend hot in
BC-ID 9 for presentation.zip
Marshall Method contd
13 3. MARSHALL MOULD PREPARATION Get all the sizes ready for trial Determining the total required weight Proportioning and mould preparation mould preparation.xls
4. MARSHALL PROPERTIES
..\BC-ID 9 for presentation.zip
5. STUDY THE TREND OF PROPERTY CURVES Marshall Method contd
14 6. OBC SELECTION AND CONFIRMATION 7. PLANT CONTROL Cold bin calibration It ensures correct hot bin proportioning It helps to ensure nil balance between production at quarry and consumption at site Reduces the overflow in hot bin Reduces the re-handling operations Reduces the segregation in the final mix Increases the production capacity How to calibrate? Marshall Method contd
15 Hot bin calibration To ensure the correct proportions in the mix To ensure the weighing balances being used are correct 8. SITE TRIAL To check the workability To establish the rolling pattern Marshall Method contd
16 JMF : Job Mix Formula It defines the tolerance limits for grading of aggregate as well as binder content. Tolerances for gradation as well as binder content is given in MOST, but apart from this still mix should be produced as per the limits specified in design criteria. see sheet JMF graph in the following slide JMF graph.xls Marshall Method contd
17
Sieve Limits Size 37.5 +8 26.5 +8 13.2 +8 4.75 +7 2.36 +6 0.300 +5 0.075 +2 Binder +3 JMF Limits as per MOST : Marshall Method contd
18 Grading chart with JMF Grading chart for BC 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Sieve size in mm %
o f
P a s s i n g UL LL Designed JMF LL JMF UL
19 What is most commonly used design method and Why? Marshall Method, Because Simple technique Simple, inexpensive, and portable equipment Less time consumable Marshall Method contd
20 Characteristics of Marshall method: Unconfined test and maximum failure load in the test is recorded as stability. Shortfalls in Mrashall method: It measures merely the adhesive strength of bitumen-filler mortar. It can not predict the fatigue behavior of the bitumen. Irrespective of traffic its design blows are 75 only Marshall Method contd
21 Shortfalls in Mrashall method: It is unconfined but at field it is not so Empirical and parameters are not directly related to field performance (Deformation, Fatigue resistance etc.) Wide range of grading limits It doesn't explain about easily compactable mixes Compaction (Impact method) It doesnt guarantee the minimum air voids Marshall Method contd
22 Due to above said limitations and shortfalls there has been a growing feeling among the Highway engineers, Which led them to other methods like Superpave Mix Refusal Density Method Film Thickness Method etc.
Marshall Method contd 23 SUPERPAVE MIX This method can measure the fundamental properties like fatigue , rutting and low temperature resistance. Developed by SHRP , USA This is also recommended by (FHWA). This method consists of 1. Selection of material 2. Selection of design aggregate structure 3. Selection of design asphalt binder content, and 4. Evaluation of moisture susceptibility
24 Notes for Design : Filler to binder ratio : 0.6 to 1.2 Air voids : 3 to 5 % Min. VMA w.r.t. nominal maximum size VFB w.r.t. traffic volume Asphalt film thickness : 6 to 8 micro meter.
25 1. Selection of materials: Binder : PG64-22 Aggregate: Restrictions on angularity, flaky and elongated particles of CA and FA Restrictions on clay content Aggregate Requirements.doc Maximum density line 0.45 power chart Gradation control mechanism. Nominal maximum size and maximum size SUPERPAVE MIX contd
26 Maximum density line :
Maximum density(P) = 100X(d/D) 0.45 where : P = Total % passing given sieve d = Size of sieve opening D =Max. size of aggregate (mentioned in sieve size)
SUPERPAVE MIX contd
27 0.45 power chart Nijboer, a person working for Bureau of Public Roads in Netherlands was done lots of investigation and found that the densest configuration occurs for a straight line gradation plotted on a 0.45 power chart. This is also recommended by Federal Highway Administration(F HWA). SUPERPAVE MIX contd
28 0.45 power chart It is a graphical representation of sieve sizes raised to power 0.45 in x-axis and % passing in y- axis. This curves are helpful in making necessary adjustments in mix designs. The grading line matching with this line gives the mix, which is having maximum density and min. VMA. The air voids of the mix shall become very low that is why this type of mix can not be used. SUPERPAVE MIX contd
29 0.45 power chart The line deviates from this either finer side or coarser side shall make a mix having more air voids and adjustment can be done based on the requirements. To determine the line easily just draw a line from % passing the 0.075mm sieve to the sieve first passing 100% It is always advisable to avoid the design grading which matches the maximum density grading line. SUPERPAVE MIX contd
30 Gradation control mechanism: It specifies the detailed grading limits which gives better quality mixes. Restricted zones of gradation is specified based on the maximum nominal size of the aggregate in the mix. The mix design which by-pass this restricted zone shall always gives better results with respect to workability stability and surface texture etc. restricted zone as per superpave.htm
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 31 Sieve size in mm For 37.5 mm nomi. Size(% passing) For 25.0 mm nomi. size(% passing) For 19.0 mm nomi. size(% passing) 4.75 34.7 34.7 39.5 39.5 2.36 23.3 27.3 26.8 30.8 34.6 34.6 1.18 15.5 21.5 18.1 24.1 22.3 28.3 0.600 11.7 15.7 13.6 17.6 16.7 20.7 0.300 10.0 10.0 11.4 11.4 13.7 13.7 Restricted zones for diff. sizes
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 32 Importance of restricted zone: The restricted zone has been specified to ensure adequate aggregate structure is developed in the mixture. Gradation requirements specify that mixes must plot either above the restricted zone or below the restricted zone. Gradation control points on the 2.36 mm sieve control the amount of sand sized particles in the mixture.
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 33 Importance of restricted zone: The upper control point limits the sand, in the mixture to exclude sand-asphalt mixes which are quite difficult to compact. The lower control point ensures adequate sand in contained in the mix to ensure a dense graded mixture. Mixes which passes above the restricted zone will tend to be sandier and have a weaker aggregate structure than mixes which pass below the restricted zone.
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 34 Importance of restricted zone: Mixes which pass below the restricted zone are gap graded. They develop an aggregate structure with the load carrying capacity provided by the large aggregate particles. Sand size particles play more passive role. If additional sand is added, then the gradation will enter into the restricted zone, and sand particle would begin to separate the coarse aggregate particles reducing the load carrying capability of the mixture.
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 35 Importance of restricted zone: Which structure can bear more load? Below the restricted zone Through & above the restricted zone Gap graded Dense graded
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 36 Various types of gradations: Maximum density graded: This is the gradation, which will give the maximum density for the specified maximum size of aggregate. Dense graded: Refers to a gradation that is near maximum density grading line. Gap graded: Refers to a gradation that contains only a small percentage of aggregate particles in the mid- size range. The curve is flat in mid-size range. These mixes can be prone to segregation during placement.
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 37 Various types of gradations: Open graded: Refers to a gradation that contains only a small percentage of aggregate particles in the small-rang. This results in more air voids, because there are not enough small particles to fill in the voids between larger particles. The curve is flat and near zero in the small-size range.
Uniform graded: Refers to a gradation that contains most of the particles in a very narrow size range. In essence, all the particles are the same size. The curve is steep and only occupies the narrow size range specified.
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 38
39
40
41
42
43
44 Grading chart with all details 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.01 2.01 4.01 Sieve sizes raised to 0.45 power %
a g e
p a s s i n g spec LL spec UL max density restric LL restric UL BC9 BC 7
45 Nominal Max. & Max size: Nominal maximum size = one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10% Maximum size = one size larger than nominal maximum size Ex: 12.5 nominal maximum size aggregate Sieve size in mm %age passing Remarks 19 100 Max. size 12.5 90 - 100 Nom. Max. size 10.0 <90 One size smaller than nom.mx.size
SUPERPAVE MIX contd 46 Bitumen content: which project consumes more bitumen per cu.m.?
PROJECT A % bitumen in DBM 4.2%
PROJECT B % bitumen in DBM 4.0%
Density : 2.450 g/cc Density : 2.680 g/cc 102.9 kg/ cu.m 107.2 kg/ cu.m OTHER METHODS
47 Right or wrong??? Binder content in DBM: Min. 4.0% by wt. Of total mix. Rock A
Rock A Rock B Volume : 1 cu.m. Volume : 1 cu.m. Specific gravity : 2.45 Specific gravity : 2.95 Bitumen required = 2.45X4/100 = 98 kg/cu.m Bitumen required = 2.95X4/100 = 118 kg/cu.m OTHER METHODS CONTD
48 Coating thickness??
Bitumen is not to increase the volume It may require to give adequate coat to the aggregate. Rock A Rock B Coating thick ness Coating thick ness
OTHER METHODS CONTD 49 Conclusions:
It may be wrong perception to express the bitumen content based on the total weight of mix.
Another method to arrive at optimum bitumen content Asphalt film coating thickness
OTHER METHODS CONTD 50 OBC based on Asphalt film thickness:
b = (100-b) x A x t x r b
where, b = % binder content A = surface area of the aggregate, m2/kg t = Asphalt film coating thickness, m r b = Unit weight of asphalt, kg/m3
OTHER METHODS CONTD 51 OBC based on Asphalt film thickness: Example: A = 4.620 m2/kg b = 4.8% r b =1050 kg/m3 Film thickness, t = =
T = 10.4 microns
6 8 mic. asphalt film thickness is advisable OTHER METHODS CONTD 52 Refusal Density Method: Keeping the bitumen content same establish number of blows required to achieve maximum density/minimum air voids for the given mix. Use that number of blows for mix design All the remaining steps would be same.