Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Administrative
Motivation
2011.5.13
Motivation
2011.5.13
Motivation
2011.5.13
K bC
1/wK
Autos
US CHN Toys Do the US and China really produce the same set of goods?
bA
L 1/wL
This Time
Models Ricardian Model Single-Cone HO Model Ricardo-Viner Model Multiple-Cone HO Model Issues Why do countries gain from trade? Does everyone within a country gain? How are gains affected by immobility? How directly do countries compete? How does trade evolve with development? What role for product variety in trade? How do firms influence trade? Putting it all together: a unified theory of trade?
QChem
Chemicals
US
US
Apparel
QApp
10
3 million more jobs have been lost to cheap overseas labor markets as corporate America campaigns relentlessly for higher productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness, all of which have been revealed to be nothing more than code words for the cheapest possible labor in the world.
Lou Dobbs Congressional Testimony 2007.3.28
11
US Manufacturing Employment,1948-2013
www.bls.gov
12
Industry Agriculture Mining Manufacturing Services Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Professional Health Education Other Total
Source: BEA.
1970 2.6 1.4 22.7 73.3 14.6 5.4 3.2 0.7 50.1 100
2006 1.0 2.0 11.7 85.3 20.9 11.8 6.8 0.9 45.8 100
13
14
Just a Cycle?
www.bls.gov
15
Just a Cycle?
There are jobs -- lets have a little straight talk here -- there are some jobs that arent coming back to Michigan.
There are some jobs that wont come back here to South Carolina.
(Etc.)
John McCain On the campaign trail, 2008
We need to go to the community colleges and design education and training programs so that these workers get a second chance. Thats our obligation as a nation.
16
Just a Cycle?
Over the past several years, the president has failed to call China a currency manipulator, Romney said at a rally in Shawnee State University in Portsmouth, Ohio.
Let me tell you, on Day One of my administration I will label China a currency manipulator. We have got to get those jobs back and get trade to be fair.
17
Just a Cycle?
State of the Union 2013.2.12
Our first priority is making America a magnet for manufacturing. After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three. (APPLAUSE)
There are things we can do, right now, to accelerate this trend. Last year, we created our first manufacturing innovation institute in Youngstown, Ohio.
(APPLAUSE)
And I ask this Congress to help create a network of 15 of these hubs and guarantee that the next revolution in manufacturing is made right here in America. We can get that done.
18
Just a Cycle?
Whos Right? How Can We Tell?
Questions
(Issues)
Theory
(Stories)
Data
(Evidence)
19
20
Multiple- vs Single-Cone HO
Multiple-Cone HO Two factors of production Two countries Many industries FPE within a cone, but different relative wages across cones Countries incompletely specialize in the goods they produce, but do not produce all goods Factor accumulation leads to changes in product mix
21
Incomplete specialization
U.S. Snowboard Imports, 2001 Average Value Quantity Price ($mill) (000) ($/board) Canada 16.6 427 39 Austria 15.1 235 64 China 14.5 243 60 Spain 5.8 65 89 Germany 3.8 54 70 France 2.3 20 115 Tunisia 1.7 19 89 Mexico 1.7 208 8 Italy 1.6 32 50 Taiwan 0.7 52 14 Switzerland 0.7 6 117 Bulgaria 0.5 9 53 Other 17.6 450 39 Total 82.6 1820 45
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
In 2001, the U.S. imported snowboards from 24 countries Who are the largest exporters? Why?
22
U.S. Snowboard Imports, 2001 Average Value Quantity Price ($mill) (000) ($/board) Canada 16.6 427 39 Austria 15.1 235 64 China 14.5 243 60 Spain 5.8 65 89 Germany 3.8 54 70 France 2.3 20 115 Tunisia 1.7 19 89 Mexico 1.7 208 8 Italy 1.6 32 50 Taiwan 0.7 52 14 Switzerland 0.7 6 117 Bulgaria 0.5 9 53 Other 17.6 450 39 Total 82.6 1820 45
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
In 2001, the U.S. imported snowboards from 24 countries Who are the largest exporters? Why?
23
bAir K
bChem
Can you see that if product prices are just right, the unit value isoquants all line up on the same isocost curve?
In that case, the U.S. might produce all four goods, but there will not be a unique equilibrium Are there any goods we know the U.S. has to produce?
Chemicals
bApp
Apparel
bFoot L
Footwear
24
bAir K
bChem
Chemicals
Mexico bApp
Apparel
China
Footwear
Countries will produce the two goods anchoring their cone, and have the relative wages associated with that cone US: aircraft and chemicals Mexico: chemicals, apparel China: apparel, footwear
26
Source: ILO.
27
US
20
1980
10
Mexico China
0
Source: Leamer and Schott (2005).
.2
.4 .6 Population Share
.8
28
29
QChem
Chemicals
US
US
Apparel
QApp
30
bAir K US
Aircraft
The U.S. initially produces all four goods Trade liberalization lowers the prices of the two most comparative disadvantage industries, Apparel and Footwear As a result, Apparel and Footwear can no longer be produced profitably in the U.S. The US abandons these industries and reallocate the released factors to Chemicals and Aircraft (In China, the reallocation is from Aircraft and Chemicals to Apparel and 31 Footwear)
bChem
Chemicals
bApp
Apparel
China bFoot L
xx
Footwear
Capitalism, then, is by nature a form or method of economic change and not only never is but never can be stationary.
And this evolutionary character of the capitalist process is not merely due to the fact that economic life goes on in a social and natural environment which changes and by its change alters the data of economic action; this fact is important and these changes (wars, revolutions and so on) often condition industrial change, but they are not its prime movers.
Nor is this evolutionary character due to a quasi-automatic increase in population and capital or to the vagaries of monetary systems, of which exactly the same thing holds true.
The fundamental impulse that sets and keeps the capitalist engine in motion comes from the new consumers, goods, the new methods of production or transportation, the new markets, the new forms of industrial organization that capitalist enterprise creates.
32
bAir K US
Aircraft
Factory return implications? None! K and L move from Apparel and Footwear to Chemicals and Aircraft, but nominal wages remain as noted by the black isocost line Realistic? Can you tell a different story?
bChem
Chemicals
bApp
Apparel
xx
Footwear
bFoot L
33
bAir K US
Aircraft
Suppose both K and L are specific to Apparel and Footwear in the US in the short run
bC
Then reallocation to Aircraft and Chemicals is not possible When prices change, returns to both factors in those industries will fall one for one with the price
bFoot 1/wLFoot L
Chemicals
bApp
Apparel
Footwear
1/wL 1/wLApp
Three different returns each for labor and capital in the US until reallocation occurs (Note: returns for K not noted on y-axis, but you can see where they would be, right?)
Labor and capital trapped in Apparel and Footwear see their wages fall, while there is no change in the wages of labor in Aircraft and Chemicals
34
bAir K US
Aircraft
Suppose only Labor is specific to Apparel and Footwear in the US in the short run Return to capital pinned down by the Aircraft and Chemicals
bApp
bC
Chemicals
Apparel
The wages of labor trapped in Apparel and Footwear fall even more
bFoot L
Footwear
1/wL 1/wLApp
1/wLFoot
35
Skilled Workers
US
Aircraft
Chemicals
Apparel Footwear
Unskilled Workers
36
The real relative wages of less skilled workers have fallen over time
37
Apparel
38
39
If imports from Canada or Mexico cost you your job ... apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance
NAFTA-TAA assists workers who lose their jobs or whose hours of work and wages are reduced as a result of trade with, or a shift in production to, Canada or Mexico. The NAFTA-TAA Program provides a comprehensive, timely array of retraining and reemployment services to all affected workers. The program extends rapid response and basic readjustment services to those who are eligible. Workers in primary firms receive these benefits under the NAFTA-TAA program, however, workers in secondary firms receive assistance under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act. How is this policy motivated by the model?
40
Just a Cycle?
White House Planning Job Training Partnership NYT 2010.10.2
President Obama plans to retrain workers for jobs that are in demand. The goal is to encourage community colleges and other training providers to work in close partnership with employers, to design a curriculum where they want to hire the people coming out of these programs right away How is this policy motivated by the model?
Austan Goolsbee Yale 91 Obamas 2nd CEA Chair
42
Just a Cycle?
State of the Union 2013.2.12
Our first priority is making America a magnet for manufacturing. After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three. (APPLAUSE) There are things we can do, right now, to accelerate this trend. Last year, we created our first manufacturing innovation institute in Youngstown, Ohio.
43
Applications of multiple-cone HO
44
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries
Development paths
Production fragmentation
45
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries
Development paths
Production fragmentation
46
47
Skill
1/wUSK
US
Aircraft
Chemicals
1/wCHK
Apparel Footwear
China
1/wUSL 1/wCHL
48
Skill
1/wBOSK
Some regions within the United States are far more skill abundant than others E.g., the northeast versus Appalachia
Footwear
Chemicals
1/wAPPALK
Apparel
Evidence?
Raw Labor
Appalachia
1/wBOSL 1/wAPPALL
49
Middle
Over time, skill premia have widened. Can you tell a story with this outcome?
Middle
51
Do regions of the US produce the same mix of goods? No! In a given year, regions produce fewer manufacturing industries in common the more different are their skill premia
Andy Bernard Tuck
Over time, regions whose skill premia diverge move to product mixes that become more dissimilar
Why would skill premia diverge?
52
Implications?
Skill
Aircraft
Chemicals
Apparel
Mexico
Footwear
Appalachia
53
There is an arrow for each country Where the arrow starts represents level of US apparel imports in 1990 Where it ends represents US apparel imports in 1998
54
Implications?
Autor, Dorn and Hanson (2012) examine US regions exposure to Chinese import competition between 1990 and 2007
The find that social welfare payments rise sharply with this exposure
David Dorn CEMFI Gordon Hanson UCSD David Autor MIT
55
56
57
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries Development paths Production fragmentation A three-factor multiple-cone model Is China different?
58
development paths
59
Development Paths
Think about development as the accumulation of capital relative to labor
QFootwear/LCH
bAir K
Aircraft
bChem
Chemicals
bApp
Apparel Footwear
bF
bApp
bC
bAir
KCH/LCH
QApparel/LCH
bF L
bF
bApp
bC
bAir
KCH/LCH 60
Development Paths
Qi/LCH
Aircraft
bAir K US
Aircraft
bC
Chemicals
bF
bApp
bC
bAir
KCH/LCH
Evidence?
bApp
wCHL
Apparel Footwear
bF L
bF bApp bC bAir KCH/LCH
61
bAir K
Aircraft
1/wK
bC Japan1980
Chemicals
Japan1970 1/wK
Apparel
1970 1997
bApp
Footwear
bF 1/wL 1/wL L
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
Notes: Total exports are decomposed into the ten categories noted on the y-axis. Negative numbers on the x-axis indicate net imports while positive numbers mean net exports. Data source: U.S. Census Bureau.
62
See if production rises and then falls as a countrys capital labor ratio rises
Qic/Lc
b1
b2
Kc/Lc
i = industry c = country
Estimation: does industry i output across countries begin to rise or fall at the same capital abundance ratios across countries? 64
65
DEU
But are all these countries really producing the same electronics? How could you tell?
IRL ISR AUT KOR GBR SWE NLD BEL ITA
JPN
1500
1000
FRA
500
MYS BRA PRT GRC ARG THA ZAF TUR MEX URY VEN PHL CRI COL ZWE JOR CHL GTM MUS ECU IND PAN 0 KEN BOL LKA
NOR AUS
10
20
30 40 K/L ($000)
50
60
66
Industries sorted by average capital intensity across countries Countries sorted by capital abundance
67
68
Labor-Intensive HO Aggregate
150 1,000
Middle HO Aggregate
CAN DNK
Capital-Intensive HO Aggregate
20,000
DEU
LKA
750
GBR ISR ESP USA JPN SWE BEL DEU KOR IRL AUT FIN NOR ITA NZL AUS
100
VEN MEX CHL PAN COL GTM PHL ZWE TUR GRC
15,000
500
10,000
50
DNK IRL
FIN
MYS
250
5,000
PRT GRC CHL MYS TURVEN ECU ZWE COL PHL PAN MEX BOL IND LKA
FIN USA BEL GBR AUT FRA CAN DNKNLD AUS NOR ESP KOR ITA ISR
IRL
SWE JPN
CHL
NZL
69
US Production
Time
(Note that the HO model has nothing to say about how new products arise. We will discuss product innovation further, later in the course.)
70
The opening up of new markets, foreign or domestic, and the organizational development from the craft shop and factory to such concerns as U.S. Steel illustrate the same process of industrial mutationthat incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.
71
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries Development paths Production fragmentation A three-factor multiple-cone model Is China different?
72
production fragmentation
73
K, Skill bR&D
Suppose initially that the US produces all three parts of a supply chain domestically
US
bParts
Parts Assembly
1/wK
R&D
bA 1/wL L
74
1/wK
R&D
US
bParts
Parts
Mex
Assembly
bA 1/wL L
75
Industry Agriculture Mining Manufacturing Services Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Professional Health Education Other Total
Source: BEA.
1970 2.6 1.4 22.7 73.3 14.6 5.4 3.2 0.7 50.1 100
2006 1.0 2.0 11.7 85.3 20.9 11.8 6.8 0.9 45.8 100
76
K, Skill
US
Aircraft , Software Design
Another example, in services, would allow low-level, easily codified tasks to be outsourced
E.g. coding versus software design in IT, bookkeeping versus consulting in accounting, spreadsheet building versus deal conceptualization in finance
Labor
IT
77
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries Development paths Production fragmentation A three-factor multiple-cone model Is China different?
78
79
Three-Factor, Multiple-Cone HO
Leamer 1987
Human Capital
Industries input intensities as well as countries factor abundances are represented by rays from the origin, as before
They pierce an endowment triangle (simplex)
Labor
Capital
80
Three-Factor, Multiple-Cone HO
Leamer 1987
Human Capital
1/wH
Industries input intensities as well as countries factor abundances are represented by rays from the origin, as before
They pierce an endowment triangle (simplex) Can you see that, in equilibrium, there will be an isocost plane that must be tangent to three isoquants And that the intercepts of this plane mark the inverse of the relative wages, just like before? Ok, now just focus on the triangle, and forget the axes.
81
1/wL 1/wK
Labor
Capital
Endowment Triangle
Human Capital
Each side of the endowment triangle measures the intensity of the two factors anchoring it As you move along the side of an endowment triangle, the intensities rise or fall Any point along a ray from one vertex of the triangle to its opposing side picks out points with the same input intensity of the opposing side
L
K/L=11,000 K/L=99,000
More K/L These industries have the same K/L but different H/L and H/K
82
Endowment Triangle
Human Capital
Movement of a country within the endowment triangle indicates changes in its use of factors
More H/L
More H/K
As a country moves along the green line, it becomes more K/L and K/H intensive; i.e., it is capital deepening, just as before
L
More K/L
This industry is becoming more capital intensive over time because it is moving toward the K vertex
83
Low
High
85
0.67
0.25
ARG
Labor / Cropland
PRY SYR
Cropland / Capital
0.10 AUS
SLE GHA
3.33
6.67
16.67
Labor
0.83 0.33
BRA PAN CAN0.05 ECU DOM CHL HUN MEX GRC PER COL PHL CRI PRT ESP LKA 0.03 MYS USA IDN DNK IRL FIN MUS FRA SWE 0.01 ITA AUT ISR NOR GBR NZL BEL KORDEU OAN Capital NLD ICE JPN CHE 0.17 0.08 HKG 0.03 SGP
Labor / Capital
Source: Leamer et al 1999.
86
Low
High
87
Peasant agriculture Uses little capital and large amounts of labor compared with land Temporary crops Picked by hand Requires more land per worker K/L at the low end of manufacturing Permanent crops Picked by machines K/L at the higher end of manufacturing
Land
Footwear, apparel and machinery use increasing amounts of capital per labor but no land
88
Land
Can you see how the triangles A, B, C, D and E are higher-dimensional cones? They are tilted like facets of a diamond, as they are associated with different factor rewards
Temporary Crops
E
Peasant Farming
A B C
Permanent Crops
Can you see how the formation of these cones depend on product prices?
Can you see that a country with endowments within these cones would produce the three goods that anchor them? Recall zero profit conditions
89
Land scarce countries (e.g., Taiwan?) Capital accumulation leads to a development path like the ones we have been talking about in the two-factor models up to this point Land-abundant countries (e.g., Philippines?) Capital accumulation leads to a shift away from temporary crops in favor of permanent crops Once suffcient capital is accumulated to get to B, the country begins to industrialize But what if riskiness associated with land abundance deters capital accumulation? B is a high-risk cone for capital since variation in the price of the crop affects the return to capital. If global investors try to avoid cone B, the emergence of manufacturing may be delayed, preventing increases in the return to labor that normally come with capital accumulation
90
Land
Temporary Crops
E
Peasant Farming
A B C
Permanent Crops
Political Economy
Engerman and Sokolov (1997)
Endowments
Relative Wages
Endowments
Political Institutions
Relative Wages
91
Political Economy
Engerman and Sokolov (1997) and Leamer et al (1999)
Some forms of land abundance (southern U.S., the tropics) foster unequal land ownership The scale economies associated with raising permanent crops such as sugar and coffee fuel the acquisition of ever greater plantations Because plantations encouraged the use of slaves, land-owners remain a small minority in these economies Great disparities in wealth Politics of exclusion Other forms of land abundance (e.g., northern U.S. and Canada) feature little or no scale economies Family-owned or small-holder farms emerge Slaves not viable in production Population is more homogenous, racially and economically Political institutions evolve to stress a voice for all Less inequality, greater growth?
92
Low
High
93
Applications of Multiple-Cone HO
Wage and product-mix variation within countries Development paths Production fragmentation A three-factor multiple-cone model Is China different?
94
End
95
96
Khandelwal cycling
97
Quality Ladder
US
98
more on robots
99
The first industrial revolution began in Britain in the late 18th century, with the mechanisation of the textile industry. Tasks previously done laboriously by hand were brought together in a single cotton mill, and the factory was born. The second industrial revolution came in the early 20th century, when Henry Ford mastered the moving assembly line and ushered in the age of mass production. Now a third revolution is under way. Manufacturing is going digital Now a product can be designed on a computer and printed on a 3D printer In time, these amazing machines may be able to make almost anything, anywherefrom your garage to an African village.
100
101
102
103
Honest to a Fault
(How the US Lost Out on iPhone Work NYT 2012.1.22)
JOBS: Those jobs arent coming back. Companies like Apple say the challenge in setting up U.S. plants is finding a technical work force. In particular, companies say they need engineers with more than high school, but not necessarily a bachelors degree. Americans at that skill level are hard to find.
104
Honest to a Fault
(How the US Lost Out on iPhone Work NYT 2012.1.22)
JOBS: Those jobs arent coming back. Companies like Apple say the challenge in setting up U.S. plants is finding a technical work force. In particular, companies say they need engineers with more than high school, but not necessarily a bachelors degree. Americans at that skill level are hard to find.
105
106
Tesla vs BYD
107