Born in the city of Tagaste near the city of Carthage (in modern day Algeria) in N.

Africa

Christian mother (Monica) Pagan father (Patricius, who ultimately adopts Christianity)

Citizen of the Roman Empire Christianity the official religion of the Empire since the edit of Constantine (313ad)
1

Educated in Carthage masters rhetoric rejects Christianity embraces sensuality Mistress & Adeodatus Accepts Manichism two opposed fundamental forces for good and evil (compare the four forces of contemporary physics: weak; strong; electromagnetic; gravity) conflict manifested in all things Explains the inevitability of human moral failing and the existence of evil
2

Becomes noted rhetorician Moves to Rome as a teacher in 384 Meets and studies w. Ambrose in Milan rejects Manicheanism & accepts (neo) platonism after intellectual struggle adopts Christianity in 387

Returns to N. Africa & becomes bishop of Hippo Writes extensively in philosophy and theology Recognized as a Father of the Church Influenced much of medieval philosophy and anticipates important ideas in modern philosophy

Distinguish knowledge of

sensible particular (contingent) objects nonsensible laws of science (or platonic forms)

universality necessity

Experience

limited by space and time results in knowledge of the sensible, contingent particular cannot produce knowledge of the universal and necessary

We do have knowledge of the universal and necessary. How?

Trickster secretly tells Confederate the answers to questions that Confederate could not otherwise know

e.g. What are the four numbers written on the paper hidden in my desk?

Trickster & Confederate publicly perform their trick for Witness Trickster asks the question Confederate miraculously answers correctly and amazes Witness Witness concludes Confederate could not have known the (hidden) answers through sensation Trickster must have informed (illumined) Confederate Thats the only way Confederate could have know the answers
8

Confederate has knowledge beyond the bounds of sensation Only communication suffices to explain Confederates knowledge

Certainly, Confederates knowledge acquired & not innate

Thesis: the only way to explain how a person can have knowledge of universal and necessary scientific laws/forms is to hypothesize that God informs or illuminates the person and thereby gives that particular person knowledge of the forms Notice that Illumination involves communication between God and particular individuals

Rejection of Platonic Nativism since knowledge of the forms is not common to all persons
10

The process of illumination is unspecified

Illumination is not innate because

knowledge of laws/forms is differentially acquired during the course of life different people learn different science/forms at different times whereas innate knowledge is common to all and inherent in all throughout life

11

Argument from Hierarchy The universe is hierarchically organized, with forms at the top and above people Nothing can act upon anything higher in the hierarchy So, people cannot act on forms

12

So, people cannot come to know the forms by acting upon the forms through study Nevertheless, some people do come to know some forms This knowledge must result from the action of something at least as high in the hierarchy as the forms But nothing is higher than the forms

13

Hence, it is the action of the forms upon people that causes knowledge Augustine holds that

God = the forms God is the summation of the forms God is the self-knowing creator who creates the universe by establishing (in matter) the forms which exist as ideas in Gods mind

So, an individuals knowledge of the forms is the result of Gods communicating about the forms with the individual knower.

Gods communicating with a person is Gods informing the person.

14

To know a language is to know the meaning of words in the language Meaning distinguishes between coextensive properties contrast triangular & trilateral A language learner cannot distinguish co-extensive properties in experience by ostention So, meaning & language cannot be learned experientially

15

Since language is mastered differentially, it is not innate but rather taught The only possible teacher is God; it takes a miracle = illumination (some nonsensory process) to explain the acquisition of language

16

Some people learn scientific laws or forms with full necessity and universality Sensation alone cannot provide such knowledge since it pertains only to the particular Sensation must be supplemented by the universal principle of induction authorizing inference from the particular to the general Illumination must be the source of such knowledge of the principle of induction
17

If illumination is divine intervention,

why does learning require our effort and work? why does God illumine evil people? what is the exact process of illumination? how do you know when youve been illumined rather than deceived?

18

The universe changes constantly To change is to become something from what was not e.g. if a leaf changes from green to red, it becomes red from what was not, i.e. what was not red So, change requires that something come from nothing, i.e. that something comes from what was not.

19

It is impossible under purely natural processes that something come from nothing. So, there must exist something God that never changes and miraculously creates each momentary stage of the changing universe from what was not = nothing (ex nihilo). To create ex nihilo is to create without using matter; it is to create simply by decree, command or thought.

20

Since God creates the universe ex nihilo, God is responsible for everything in the universe both good and bad In creating the universe, God foresees or knows the entire history of the universe in full detail So God knows everything that each person does before he/she does it

21

(i) By hypothesis, God is perfect = benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient (ii) Assume: Evil exists (iii) God created the universe ex nihilo So, God is responsible for evil (assuming evil exists)

22

But if God is perfect, God could not be responsible for evil Now we have a contradiction =

God is & is not responsible for evil

Contradictions are never true and arise in arguments resulting from one or more false assumptions Hence, either (i), (ii), or (iii) must be false

23

Augustine rejects (ii); he asserts that what we take to be evil is really good Evil is illusory Recognition of evil is a fallible theoretical inference, not observation!

Recall: Is perception top down?

Suffering is really a good thing it appears evil to us as an inference from a false theory = ignorance of Gods purpose in allowing it
24

Immorality results when people freely choose what, contrary to appearance, is actually good yet not as good as what they might otherwise have chosen immorality is really the lesser of two goods, not the reality of evil

25

In creating ex nihilo, God knows the entire career of the universe So, God knows every human action before it occurs What God knows shall occur must occur So, every human action that does occur must occur What must occur is necessary So, every human action is necessary What is necessary is not free So, no human action is free!
26

All propositions are true or false So, all propositions about the future are true or false Consider all true propositions about the future

the ones about you = your autobiography

These propositions now indicate what will happen

your autobiography indicates all that you will ever do

If the propositions about the future are now true, then what they indicate will happen must happen So, what will happen, must happen What must happen is necessary
27

So, whatever will happen is necessary Hence everything that will happen according to your autobiography is necessary Whatever is necessary is not free So, nothing in your autobiography is free Hence you are not free & neither is anyone else Human freedom is illusory
28

Compatibilism maintains that freedom is compatible with necessity Augustine is a compatibilist: he maintains that

Gods omniscience or providence does indeed imply that all human actions are necessary But necessary actions may be voluntary A persons action is voluntary if the person acts as she wants, decides or wills. A free action is merely a voluntary action. Hence a free action may be a necessary action since voluntary actions may be necessary.
29

Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action, even if the action is necessary But, assume that youre imprisoned & cannot leave

it is necessary that you stay does your staying voluntarily make your staying free?

30

Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action, even if the action is necessary But, voluntary actions require volitions Are volitions themselves necessary? If volitions are necessary, are voluntary actions really free?

31