Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Similarities
Project planning origin US DOD Iterative in nature, allow for the introduction of changes to the original plan Assign tasks and responsibilities Concept of managing the scope of the operation or project. The project management plans sub-plans, such as the communications management plan, risk management plan, and configuration management plan, are not unlike the annexes, tabs, and appendixes produced to supplement a military operations order Project managers - the executive officer is charged with similar duties.
How it differs ??
Time constraints Unknown risks Change in scope dynamic Real time decision making Mistakes - Fatal Irreversibility
Challenges
Reducing duration of decision making process Interoperability collaborative operations tailoring and time phasing of force deployment in crisis situations real-time requirement Increasingly complex multinational environment Joint decision making coordinating remotely located planners time-varying uncertain information from multiple sources Absence of universal model- wider operational disparity
Mission analysis
Courses of action
Approval
Planning hierarchy
Strategic
Operational
Tactical
Strategic
National or alliance security objectives and develops and uses national resources to accomplish those objectives Define limits and assess risks for the use of military and other instruments of power Formal structured People involved NSA,PMO, President, military chiefs
Operational
level at which campaigns and major operations are planned, conducted and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theatres or areas of operations. establishing operational objectives needed to accomplish the strategic objectives. Formal structured
Tactical
level at which battles and engagements are planned and executed to accomplish military objectives assigned to tactical units dynamic multi-dimensional process where the decision-maker must execute the decision process within the timeframe of the enemy's decision cycle
Categories of planning
Deliberate planning
Deliberate planning
The deliberate planning process is not generally subject to the immediate time lines or prevailing threats. Proactive plans It develops operation plans for contingencies and for later execution
Planning process
Strategic and operational levels of planning structured formal processes. In contrast, the tactical level is not a well-known structured process output of the planning process is an Op O (Operation Order)
1
Initiation - receiving mission
Starts with the reception, by the chief of defense staff (CDS), of a political direction from the government. Designation and notification of the planning staff Assembly of all relevant material
2
Orientation- mission analysis
Commander orients the staff towards requirements of the initiated operation The mission is developed and analyzed. This mission analysis - brainstorming Determines the nature of the problem and confirms the results to be achieved.
3
Course of Action development
commander's planning guidance developed in the previous step is used as a framework by the planning staff to develop the initial COAs. Factors:
theatre situation opposing forces military capabilities time and space assessment of the tasks.
Different COAs are compared in order to determine the most effective one.
Steps
1. Analyze Relative Combat Power - resources and leadership we have to
accomplish our goal
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Generate options - brainstorming Array Initial Forces- similar to WBS- creating responsibility matrix Develop the Scheme of Maneuver how? - graphical Assign Headquarters - who reports to whom Prepare COA Statements and sketches
4
Plan development
Expansion or alteration are considered at this step, To convert a developed COA into: Contingency operations (COP) plan in the case of the deliberate planning Operations order (OP O) plan in the case of crisis action planning.
Functional plan
OP O (operation order)
An OP O is the plan where details of the mission are filled in to include all supporting forces and activities. Presented in the form of a directive issued by a commander to the staff or subordinate commanders
5
Plan review- war game
Reviewed by evaluating their corresponding COAs through exercises, war gaming or other techniques such as logistics flow modeling. Choice of review method War-gaming is an iterative process During the war game, each COAs strengths and weaknesses are discovered, unforeseen events are exposed, and problems are identified War-gaming is comparable to project risk management
Demerits :
effectiveness subject to the skills of the commander and the individual staff members computer assisted simulation models
Decision theoretic models Artificial intelligence models Other methods: Game theory Petri network Data mining BI tools
6
Comparison ,Approval and Orders Production.
Coas are compared. Presented to the commander for approval Does not meet the stated intent, can be done better, or is modified, the staff will return to the war-gaming process and begin again. Iterative Military operations order -base order + additional annexes, appendixes, and tabs that provide additional detail.
Inadequate Counterterrorism Training and Equipment for the Local Police Flawed Hostage-Rescue Plan. Poor Strategic Communications and Information Management
References:
Boukhtouta A, A. Bedrouni, J. Berger, F. Bouak, A. Guitouni ;Survey of Military Planning Systems; Defence Research and Development journal Canada DAN STOBER ; Military Orders Process vs. Project Management Methodology, (2013);http://blog.globalknowledge.com/government/7952/#sthash.E9T4NNbZ.dpuf Angel Rabasa et al;The Lessons of Mumbai;2009; ISBN/EAN: 9780833046673 Zeev Maoz; The Decision to Raid Entebbe: Decision Analysis Applied to Crisis Behavior; The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 25, No. 4. (Dec., 1981), pp. 677-707.