Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategically Leveraging
Early Commercial
Services for Lunar Vision
NewSpace 2009
Robert M. Kelso
Manager, Lunar Commercial Services
www.nasa.gov
July 2009
Utilization of the Moon for NASA’s Vision
Apollo Model
From NASA as the
customer funding prime
contractors on a cost plus
fixed fee basis
Increased
Private Sector
Resources
Commercial –
(COTS/CRS) Model
To NASA as a customer and partner,
working with other customers, financiers,
and emerging space companies on fixed
price basis to secure capabilities, services
and products
Business Model comparison: NASA-Traditional
versus NewSpace/Commercial Leveraged
Category Apollo Era Commercial-
Owner NASA leveraged
Industry Era
Contract fee-type Cost+ Fixed Price
Contract arrangement Prime Contractor Partnership/IDIQ
NASA as customer “THE” customer “A” customer
Funding for capability NASA procures capability; NASA provides seed-
demonstration funds per performance investment via milestone
evaluation board payment
DDTE responsibility NASA Industry
Maintainability/Disposi NASA Industry
tion
Procurement length Multi-year buy
Business approach System/component buy Service-based buy
NASA’s role in NASA defines “WHAT” and NASA defines only “WHAT”
capability “HOW” Industry defines “HOW”
development
Critical path NASA only $/unit measure
Requirements NASA defines detailed NASA define top-level
definition requirements capabilities needed
Cost structure Total cost $/unit measure
Lunar Commercial
Payload Delivery
LunEx
www.nasa.gov
Google Lunar X-Prize: Seeding the Market
Google Lunar X PRIZE: International competition to safely land a robot on the
surface of the Moon, travel 500 meters, & send images/data to Earth. Teams must
be at least 90% privately funded & be registered by 12/31/10. Maximum potential
prize of $30M to winner.
Odyssey Moon Astrobotic Team Italia Micro Space Mystery Team FredNet
Preferred Partners:
15 Market estimated at
X
~3B over 10 yrs
NASA-ILN
(most likely)
NASA-ILN
10 Proof of concept X
missions UK
NASA-ILN
5 X NASA-ESMD
GLXP2 X -1
B-Ent ISRO
NASA-ILN
DLR
0 NASA-ESMD
GLXP1 A-Ent-1 China JAX UK ESA China
X Commercial Lunar Support Services
O8 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Note: ENT missions not counted
Cumulative Missions 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 19 20 20 22
(Lunar-COTS)
LunEx
Goal: “buy the ride” or “buy the data”
Small (<$100M), fully commercial end-to-end
capability
– Small-class launch vehicle/lander - few kg up to 100+ kg
payload
– Medium-class launch/lander – 300-400kg payload
Frequent, multiple flights
Commercially-leveraged: Open Competition
for lunar transportation services
Fixed price service
NASA Class-D type mission portfolio
– Similar to LCROSS
Industry provide the “Fed-Ex” to the surface
DRAFT for RFI Package
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Collaboration between
Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
Commercial Crew & Cargo Program Office
(C3PO)
Rob Kelso, Lead
Jon Michael Smith
And
www.nasa.gov
Excavator
NASA & Commercial Tractor Recover Oxygen from the Lunar Regolith
Saturday, September 12, 2009 16
BACKUP
www.nasa.gov
Next Steps
Understand NASA’s lunar “needs” :
– Develop time-phased, integrated NASA-needs list for science,
applied science, technology
• Work closely with LEAG (Mackwell, Neal) lunar roadmapping effort
Investigate development of initiative package for
FY10-11 budget submit
– New initiative start for FY11; FY10 lays administrative
groundwork
Identify FY10 funding
– Lunar Commerce Office
– NASA payload development and delivery
Create Lunar Commercialization Office
– Leads lunar acquisition in support of SMD. ESMD, and SOMD
Develop NASA acquisition strategy