Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6BUS0279
Learning outcomes
To understand the role played by quantitative techniques in decision making To understand a range of quantitative decision making techniques commonly used in business To be able to use the simpler quantitative techniques which will support decision making
3BUS0279
strategic
tactical
operational
Many complex factors Mix depends on decision Smaller decision scope Non-numerical relationships Good approx. by numerical models Judgment and experience needed Assumptions require qualitative input
ALL decisions are a mix of quantitative and qualitative factors In general the more that decisions deal with the whole business . . . . . . . the greater the input from the qualitative factors Scenario analysis and financial models have wide strategic use Poor decisions often result from inappropriate mix of the 2 types
3BUS0279 3
3BUS0279
Application
Identifies at what point an investment project would move from loss to profit, for instance what volume, price, product mix are required
Financial
Identifies when investment projects would move into profit ie: when up front investment and the ongoing costs are paid back from income Identifies whether an investment project will make a loss or a profit. This can be over the whole lifetime of the investment or over a specified number of years. Some businesses require an investment to return an overall profit over the first X years or they will not invest A forecasting tool which can be used to generate estimates of future business values (eg sales, income). It averages these quantities over the past N months/quarters/years and gives a smoothed forecast A simple but powerful method to forecast a business quantity which is increasing or decreasing over time also called trend analysis The Solution Matrix is an example. It is a pseudo quantitative tool which allows selection of the best alternative when considering qualitative factors and quantitative factors which cannot be aggregated (eg labour availability, proximity to customers, greenness)
See weekly reading for descriptions of a wider range of numerical tools commonly used in business
3BUS0279 5
X W
PROFIT (m)
Product Y Product Z
V X
INVESTMENT (m)
Plot the profit against the cost of investment for each product option Where the 2 lines cross (W-W) is where it becomes better to invest in Product Y Otherwise invest in Z. But if you invest less than V-V you make a loss If you have the available funds invest up to X in Product Y
3BUS0279 6
Pay-off period
This very simple technique is used if you need to determine when you start to make a cumulative profit on an investment Tabulate cost, income and net position on a monthly, quarterly or yearly basis Where the cumulative net position goes positive is the pay-off period This is important to a business as it is the point at which they will no longer lose money from an investment Business environments are volatile and can quickly reduce investment viability The sooner pay-off occurs, the lower the risk
In k Cost Income Net Cum Net Year 1 745 600 -145 -145 Year 2 797 780 -17 -162 Year 3 995 1,134 +139 -23 Year 4 984 1,160 +176 +153
4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Cost-Benefit
This accounting based technique is used to determine whether an investment will be profitable. It can also be used to vary key inputs to look at the sensitivity of the profit to possible future changes List all the costs and all the incomes Separate these into sub-categories but not too finely divided Identify the spend per time period eg monthly, quarterly, yearly Tabulate, calculate the totals and compare cost and income total Enhancements
Ratios
2 important ratios Cost/Income: Total cost Total Income Must be < 100% or no profits Profit margin:100% - cost/income % of sales which are profit Can be calculated overall or as a marginal value for one sales unit
3BUS0279
What-if analysis
Build your cost-benefit using a spreadsheet Enter the key variables in cells Change these variables The sensitivity of the investment to changes in key variables can be determined eg:
Price, market share, manufacturing cost, raw material costs etc 8
Cost-Benefit example
Costs (k) Manufacturing Advertising Warehousing Retail costs Overheads TOTAL COSTS (k) Sales volume (k) Price() TOTAL INCOME (k) PROFIT (k) Year 1 400 150 50 15 130 745 100 6.00 600 -145 Year 2 500 100 50 10 137 797 130 6.00 780 -17 Year 3 640 120 75 12 148 995 180 6.30 1,134 +139 Year 4 660 90 75 9 150 984 200 5.80 1,160 +176
Total = 3,674k Total = 3,521k
Cost/Income Years 1-4 = 3521/3674 = 96%. In Year 4 = 984/1160 = 85% Profit margin in Year 1 = -145/600 = -24%. In Year 4 = 176/1160 = 15%
3BUS0279 9
Forecasting
Business decisions are future orientated. They involve the allocation of resources (time, money, people) to generate an improved performance. It is not possible to know what will happen in the future, so businesses estimate the key variables prices, interest rates, sales, competitor activity
stationary
trend
3BUS0279
seasonal
cyclical
10
Check restrictions: Price varies randomly, variability not increasing Average over 2 years: (6.30 + 5.80) / 2 = 6.050 Average over 3 years: (6.00 + 6.30 + 5.80) / 3 = 6.033 Average over 4 years: (6.00 + 6.00 + 6.30 + 5.80) / 4 = 6.025 Not much difference, any of them will be okay
But maybe the price in year 4 is the best guide as it is the most recent price This is really the Moving Average over 1 period called a Nave Forecast
3BUS0279 12
From Excel the equation is y = 35x + 65 or: Sales = 35 time + 65 in Year 5: Sales = 35 x 5 + 65 = 240 (in thousands)
3BUS0279
14
eg: costs (), market share (%), distance from supplier (km)
Or where decision variables are qualitative but can be scored out of 10 Or both of the above
HOW IT WORKS: This is the methodology of the Solution Matrix used to evaluate ideas
It will also be seen again when we look at Risk Evaluation Identify the decision criteria Weight their importance to the decision, relative to each other Score each investment option out of 10: good = 10 poor = 1 Multiply the scores by the weights for each option and add them The investment option with the highest score is the best one The scores and weights can be allocated by group decision, by averaging the scores of several decision makers or as the least preferred method, by one person though this is subject to bias
3BUS0279 15
MCDA - example
Three investment options have been short-listed. The key criteria have been selected by a panel of decision makers. How each of the investment options performs against these criteria is tabulated below.
Which is the best investment option? Criterion Cost Income Labour Availability Pay-off period Environmental impact Investment 1 10m 25m Within 10 miles 3 years Significant Investment 2 12m 27m No skilled labour 3.5 years Low initially but becoming significant Investment 3 15m 32m Within 20 miles 4 years Limited
3BUS0279
16
MCDA - solution
Criteria Cost Income Labour Pay-off period Weight 10 9 5 6 Investment A Investment B Investment C
Score
8 6 8 7
Utility
80 54 40 42
Score
7 7 2 5
Utility
70 63 10 30
Score
5 8 4 4
Utility
50 72 20 24
Environment
TOTAL
16
20
193
36
202
232
The weights and scores for the options are determined by the decision panel This is best done if each member assesses the score against each criterion These are averaged to give the results saving a lot of debate Weights or scores with large differences are discussed and agreed Above, Investment A is the best . . . . . . . . but if labour supply & cost worsened the decision may be marginal
3BUS0279 17
Summary
In this lecture we have learned:
Where quantitative decisions are needed in business The process used to obtain quantitative decision inputs The range of commonly used quantitative decision tools How to use some of the simpler but common tools:
Break-even analysis Pay-off period Cost-benefit analysis Forecasting by moving averages and linear regression Multi-criteria decision analysis for: numerical criteria which cannot be added together subjectively assessed qualitative criteria
3BUS0279 18