Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group Profile:
Group no. 4
Conceptual Model
Research Questions:
What role does Emotional Intelligence play in predicting job satisfaction? How Big-Five personality traits moderate the relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Job satisfaction?
Research Objective:
To identify: The extent to which emotional intelligence predicts job satisfaction. The extent to which Big-five personality traits moderates the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. The extent to which job satisfaction is influenced by emotional intelligence and Big-five personality traits in context of Pakistan?
but once you are in that field, emotional intelligence emerges as a much stronger predictor of who will be most successful, because it is how we handle ourselves in our relationships that determines how well we do once we are in a given job
Daniel Goleman
For the effective organizations, neither the behavior not its inner processes could be ignored
(Baumeister, Vohs & Funder, 2007)
There are countless studies on the negative spillover of job pressure on family life, but few on how Job Satisfaction enhances the quality of family life also
(Albert Bandura, 1977)
Basically
there are five basic questions about a stranger, one is going to know or ask when they meet
Lewis R.Goldberg (1981, 1982 and 1983
UNDERPINING THEORY
INTRODUCTION
Highlights of the supporting literature and significant contextual perspective of paper
INTRODUCTION
EI has a concrete role in any workplace
(Zeinder, Matthews & Roberts, 2004)
Along with Big-five Personality traits, EI help individuals to tactically adjust themselves.
(Maria, Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2003).
CONTINUED
Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction are interrelated
(Judge, Thoresen, Bono and Patton, 2001; Mousavi, Yarmohammadi, Nosrat and Tarasi, 2012)
EI is also associated with leadership effectiveness and cultural adjustment and also moderates emotional exhaustion exhibited among employees, which ensures productive outcomes
(Rosete & Ciarrochi, 2005; Gabel, Dolan & Cerdin, 2005; Szczygiel, 2013)
CONTINUED
Positive and Negative personality with EI has significant impact on JS
(Kafetsiosis and Zampetakis, 2008).
Personality Traits distinguishes individuals behaviors at workplace, job performance & indidvuals outcomes.
(Berg and Feij, 2003; Hurtz and Donovan, 2000; Avsec and Kavcic, 2011)
MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS
Authors and researchers: Mayer and Salovey (1989) Leuner (1886) Greenpond (1989) Golman (1995 ) Bar-On(1997) Rode & Mooney et al (2007) Gurlford (1948) Eysneck (1947) Cattel (1957) Gurlfurd (1955) Chnstal (1958) Norman (1963) & others Hoppock (1935) Arvey (1989 & 1991) Janssen Mobley (1982)
Emotional Intelligence
Job Satisfaction
There is a lack of empirical studies, conducted contextually on this relationship (Alam, 2009) such as in Pakistan. The effects of EI and personality traits may also vary contextually. This study is aimed to fill this gap by contributing through this empirical study in this field and context of Pakistan
HYPOTHESIZES
H1: Emotional
H2: Personality
traits moderate the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction and;
2a: Extraversion is positively associated with job satisfaction. 2b: Neuroticism is negatively associated with job satisfaction. 2c:Agreeableness is positively associated with job satisfaction. 2d: Conscientiousness is positively associated with job satisfaction. 2e: Openness to experience is moderately associated with job satisfaction.
Emotional Intelligence
Emotional Intelligence defined as an ability-trait, (Mayer, Caruso and Salovey 2008) consisting of recognition, understanding, utilization and management of ones own emotional states and of others, to solve emotions-loaded problems and to regulate the behavior (Mayer & Salovey, 1995
According to some researchers emotional intelligence is a center of human talent (Boyatzis, Goleman & Rhee, 1999). Every individual differs greatly in interpreting the information that he receives from surroundings and then ultimately using that information to behave in a certain way (Cartwright and Pappas, 2008).
Job satisfaction
Job satisfaction is a pleasant feeling of emotion when individual evaluates their job (Locke, 1969). Employee retention is big issue nowadays, which can be resolved by job satisfaction in this regard JS is positively related with employee retention (Judeh, 2013)
Emotional intelligence is effectual because it helps individuals to monitor their own emotions as well to rationally handle the behaviors and stress faced in organizations which makes them more satisfied towards their job (Schutte et al, 2001; Mayer, Roberts and Barsade, 2008).
Effective performance is related with level of job satisfaction whereas emotional incompetency can result negatively . (Ahangar, 2012; Druskat and Wolff, 2001).
Effective performance is related with EI to improve their abilities such as decision making power and respond to organizational change (Chiva and Alerge, 2008 ;Scott-Lad and Chan, 2004)
Physicians in Greece
(Psilopanagioti, Anagnostopoulos, Mourtou and Niakas, 2012)
(Tanoff,1999).
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Conscientousness
Neuroticism
Moody, Insecure
Openness
How much a person is unusual towards experiences -ve emotions +ve emotions
Positive results of agreeableness, extroversion and conscientiousness with Job satisfaction (Kappagoda, 2012: Kumar &Bakhshi, 2012, Ali Hussain &Zaidi, 2011).
Neuroticism. Less friendly,More trouble at work (Klien, Lim, Saltz & Mayer, 2004).
Individuals who can deal with pressures at work (emotional intelliegance) and make profitable relationships with others (Big-five traits) enjoy more success and satisfaction with jobs (Khalatbri et al, 2011).
Measures
The scales used in this study for empirical testing were of five likert scale and were developed by :
1. Emotional Intelligence:
Schutte et al (1998) used by Chiva.R., & Alerge. J. (2006).
2. Job Satisfaction :
(Cammann.C., Fichman.M., Jenkins.D., & Klesh.J. (1983).
Model 1 2
R. Square Adjusted F. R. Square Change 0.135 0.220 0.098 0.158 3.711 3.019
Model 1
Model 1 Constant EXTRO -1.73 AGREE 0.000 CONSEN 0.135 NEU -0.175 OPEN 0.253 EI 0.189 Beta T-values 3.937 -1.410 -0.002 1.206 -1.645 2.283 2.026 Significance 0.000 0.161 0.998 0.230 0.102 0.024 0.045
Model 2
Model 2 Constant EXT_EI 3.568 AGREE_EI 0.479 CONSEN_EI -0.884 NEU_EI -1.946 OPEN_EI 1.271 EI -1.163 2.590 0.359 -0.765 -1.314 0.966 -1.995 0.011 0.194 0.445 0.199 0.336 0.048 Beta T-values Significance