You are on page 1of 24

Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Chapter 8: Managing an ERP Project

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-1

Objectives

Acknowledge the importance of project management and control Examine the process of organizational change

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-2

Factors Influencing Information Systems Project Success


Number of modifications Effective communications Authority for project implementation Business management Ability to generate additional funds to cover implementation

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-3

Factors Causing Information Systems Project Failures


Poor technical methods Communication failures Poor leadership Initial evaluation of project

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-4

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-5

Risk Factors

Organizational factors
Changes in scope Sufficiency of resources Magnitude of potential loss Departmental conflicts User experience

Management support
Changing requirements and scope Lack of commitment

Software design
Developing wrong functions, wrong user interface Problems with outsourced components
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-6

Risk Factors, continued


User involvement
Lack of commitment Ineffective communication Conflicts Inadequate familiarity with technologies Size and structure Control functions Societal norms Continue pouring resources into sinking ships
8-7

Project management

Project escalation

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Implementation Risks

Technology
Consistencies with current infrastructure

Organizational
Customization increases risks Redesign of business processes to fit package decreases risk

Human resource factors


IT staff skills and expertise

Project size
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-8

Managing Large-Scale Projects


MRP or ERP
Package implementation differs from custom implementation
Vendor participation User skills and capabilities Project champion Communication with stakeholders

Management commitment Training in MRP Good project management


Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-9

Managing ERP Projects


Implementation factors
Re-engineering business processes Changing corporate culture Project team
Include business analysts on project team

Management support Commitment to change

Risk management
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-10

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-11

Factors in Successful ERP Projects

Customization
Increases time and cost BPR advantage from best practices adoptions lost

Use of external consultants


Offer expertise in cross-functional business processes Problems arise when internal IT department not involved

Supplier relationship management


Need effective relationships to facilitate and monitor contracts

Change management
People are resistant to change Organizational culture fostering open communications

Business measures
Create specific metrics at start of project
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-12

Project-Related Factors

Project division into subprojects Project leader with proven track record Project focus on user needs instead of technology Project champion Slack time in project schedule

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-13

Additional Factors in the Success of a Project


User training
Focus on business, not just technical Critical

Management reporting requirements


May need to add query and reporting tools

Technological challenges
Data conversion Interface development
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-14

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-15

FoxMeyer versus Dow Chemical


FoxMeyer
Project went over budget because of new client Implemented two new systems at same time Technical issues with the ERP software No open communications Unrealistic expectations on ROI Had project implementation problems Dow had strong leadership and project champion Was able to adjust scope and maintain control Fostered open communications
8-16

Dow

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?

Was FoxMeyer misled? What strategies could have been put into place to avoid the project disaster? What business misjudgments occurred? Was FoxMeyers failure due to technology failure or business failure?

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-17

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued

Nations fourth largest pharmaceutical distributor


1990s engaged in enterprise-wide software and warehouse automation project Filed Chapter 11 in 1996
Claimed to be misled by SAP, Anderson Consulting, Pinnacle Automation
Claimed vendors oversold capabilities Computer integration problems topped $100 million Vendors blame management
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-18

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued Background
FoxMeyer had orders for over 300,000 items per day, anticipated much growth
Processing hundreds of thousands of transactions each day

Old system was Unisys mainframe Wanted scalable client/server system Tested SAPs software on both DEC and HP against benchmarks Implementations scheduled by Andersen for 18 months
Modules to be implemented in 2-3 months
Unrealistic could take up to 12 months All modules fast-tracked
8-19

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued Two systems for most important business systems
SAP supplied the accounting and manufacturing software
Claims volume was issue

Warehouse system from McHugh Software International


Purchased through Pinnacle Pinnacle also supplied some hardware

Added complexities to project Functional holes in systems


8-20

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued

FoxMeyer strategies
High volume Low price Anticipated savings from new computer system Wanted to win market share by further price-cutting Hoped new system would be more efficient, but did not improve processes
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-21

Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued FoxMeyer got major new client
Out of capacity of mainframe Issues on balancing system traffic Unisys-based management system eventually failed Information wasnt being received timely FoxMeyer suffered losses in transferring inventory to new centers Customers received incorrect shipments New customer didnt deliver expected volume FoxMeyer overspent
8-22

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Summary
A number of factors will effect the success or failure of a systems project
Operational methods and techniques Business management and style Leadership and communications

Risk factors effecting projects must be considered


Organizational factors, management support, software design, the levels of user involvement, and the scope and size of the project itself Implementation risks for technologies, the organization, and human resource
8-23

Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

Summary, continued
Success in ERP projects includes factoring in
Consideration of customizations, use of external consultants, management of supplier relationships, establishing metrics, and change management Project-related concerns Technological changes, user training, and management requirements
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner

8-24

You might also like