Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-1
Objectives
Acknowledge the importance of project management and control Examine the process of organizational change
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-2
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-3
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-4
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-5
Risk Factors
Organizational factors
Changes in scope Sufficiency of resources Magnitude of potential loss Departmental conflicts User experience
Management support
Changing requirements and scope Lack of commitment
Software design
Developing wrong functions, wrong user interface Problems with outsourced components
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-6
Project management
Project escalation
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Implementation Risks
Technology
Consistencies with current infrastructure
Organizational
Customization increases risks Redesign of business processes to fit package decreases risk
Project size
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-8
8-9
Risk management
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-10
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-11
Customization
Increases time and cost BPR advantage from best practices adoptions lost
Change management
People are resistant to change Organizational culture fostering open communications
Business measures
Create specific metrics at start of project
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-12
Project-Related Factors
Project division into subprojects Project leader with proven track record Project focus on user needs instead of technology Project champion Slack time in project schedule
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-13
Technological challenges
Data conversion Interface development
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-14
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-15
Dow
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?
Was FoxMeyer misled? What strategies could have been put into place to avoid the project disaster? What business misjudgments occurred? Was FoxMeyers failure due to technology failure or business failure?
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-17
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued
8-18
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued Background
FoxMeyer had orders for over 300,000 items per day, anticipated much growth
Processing hundreds of thousands of transactions each day
Old system was Unisys mainframe Wanted scalable client/server system Tested SAPs software on both DEC and HP against benchmarks Implementations scheduled by Andersen for 18 months
Modules to be implemented in 2-3 months
Unrealistic could take up to 12 months All modules fast-tracked
8-19
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued Two systems for most important business systems
SAP supplied the accounting and manufacturing software
Claims volume was issue
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued
FoxMeyer strategies
High volume Low price Anticipated savings from new computer system Wanted to win market share by further price-cutting Hoped new system would be more efficient, but did not improve processes
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-21
Featured Article: FoxMeyers Project Was a Disaster. Was the Company Too Aggressive or Was It Misled?, continued FoxMeyer got major new client
Out of capacity of mainframe Issues on balancing system traffic Unisys-based management system eventually failed Information wasnt being received timely FoxMeyer suffered losses in transferring inventory to new centers Customers received incorrect shipments New customer didnt deliver expected volume FoxMeyer overspent
8-22
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Summary
A number of factors will effect the success or failure of a systems project
Operational methods and techniques Business management and style Leadership and communications
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Summary, continued
Success in ERP projects includes factoring in
Consideration of customizations, use of external consultants, management of supplier relationships, establishing metrics, and change management Project-related concerns Technological changes, user training, and management requirements
Prentice Hall, 2005: Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
8-24