Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development and Application of Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment Models for the Korea Railway
254 individuals works for railway R&D division and national project division
Key research area - Rolling stock, track & civil engineering, signaling & electrical engineering,
design urban rail transit system, transportation technology, trans-Korean railway construction
National safety R&D program from 2004 Homepage : www.krri.re.kr
Contents
I
Introduction
II
III
Hazard Identification
IV
Conclusion
1. Introduction
Background
Cyclic occurrence of major train accidents - 2003: Daegu, subway train fire accident, 191 fatalities - 1993: Gupo, train derailment accident, 78 fatalities - 1982: Kyongsan, train collisions, 54 fatalities Environmental changes in Korea - KTX (Korea Train eXpress) operation at 2004 - Structural reform of railroad industries - Electrification of conventional lines - Preparation of TCR & TSR Railway Safety Act announced in 2004 - Focused on the risk-based safety management - Nation-wide railroad safety program & safety regulations - Hazard analysis, risk assessment & control
1. Introduction
Research Objective
Since Oct. 2005, KRRI has developed the common hazard analysis & risk assessment models for the Korea Railway.
Research Objective is to introduce - Developing procedure of the risk models - Application of the developed model to the Korea railway.
Railway System
Context
Risk Analysis
Modification
Risk Definition
Organization
Concept
Design
Construction
Exploitation
Demolition
Risk Evaluation
Maintenance
NSOR Management NSP Operation Management NSI Management NRA Operation & Management NET Operation & Management
NSP Establishment
NET Establishment NAI Establishment TS Establishment SPR Establishment ISI Plan Establishment Establishment of IS Safety Design Requirements Establishment of RS Safety Design Requirements Establishment of TR&TP Safety Design Requirements
NET Construction NAI Construction TS Construction SPR Construction ISI Sys. Modernization Construction of IS Safety Certification System Construction of RS Safety Certification System Construction of TR&TP Safety Certification System
Progress Scenarios
Casual Analysis
ETA Model
10
According to the accident classification of Railway Accident Report Regulation, The scenarios were divided into the five main areas 1) Train collision accident, 2) Train derailment accident, 3) Train fire accident, 4) Level crossing accident, 5) Railway (traffic/safety) casualty accident.
11
Hazardous Events
Mistaking in dealing points, point faults, mistaking in dealing blockage, interlocking system faults Signal/direction violation, signal fault, mistaking in dealing braking system, braking system fault, over speeding Train separation, car rolling, train stop, backward moving External obstacles, parts from train/freight falling, infrastructure collapsing/obstruction -Engine stop -Deviation of pathway -Gangway blocking -Lack of propulsion/braking -Violation entry -Limit interference -Breaking or detour Striking with train, Striking with objects
Underlying Causes: reason or source of substandard acts and conditions - Human Management Factors - Technological Factors - External Factors
13
14
15
Collective Risk
(Average Number of FWI/year)
Frequency
(Average frequency at which the scenario sequence occurs)
Consequences
(the number of FWI/scenario sequence) 1 FWI = 1 fatality = 10 major injuries = 200 minor injuries
16
Data Population
Industry safety data: safety related incidents within industry database. Incidents recorded range from train collisions to passenger burns from coffee spills Many thousands of records are reviewed and classified Where data was not available, Use was made of:
17
Accident Analysis Accident Search Environment Analysis Hazard Analysis Damage Analysis Options Analysis
Risk Analysis Event Tree Analysis Fault Tree Analysis Risk Evaluation Human Factor Analysis
18
Environment Analysis
Accident Analysis
The risk of the railway systems can be assessed by the ET/FT linking approach
- Accident progress scenarios: defined as event trees, using an event tree editor. - Each branch of the accident progress sequences requires one or more supplementary fault trees, which can be developed by a fault tree editor.
- Sum of the frequency of each sequence becomes the total frequency of the accident of concern.
Reporting Results
21
0.6744
3.6898 14.1 16.94 161.138 20.742 217.284
The overall risk made up from different profiles of frequency and consequences. Railway casualty accident : Tend to consist of high frequency low consequence type events (slips, trips and falls) Train accidents : Tend to have a risk contribution from the low frequency high consequence type events : Increase the risk contribution for the hazardous events above the level seen in practice.
22
23
5. Conclusion
The developed model will provide a generic model of the safety risk on the Korea railway Which will Increase the industrys knowledge of the risk from the operation and maintenance Allow the identification of areas of railway operation that need further risk controls
24
Thank you!
25