Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jan01 Sep04
Last Updated: Jan. 13, 2005 Joe Worthington Product Engineering QST30
Jan'01 - Sep'04
No. of Failures
4
1800 rpm
3
1800 rpm
2
1500 rpm
1
1800 rpm 1500 rpm 1500 rpm
0 LB1 LB2 LB3 LB4 LB5 LB6 RB1 RB2 RB3 RB4 RB5 RB6 Fuel Line Location
Industrial Failures
High Pressure Fuel Line Failures - QST30 Industrial
Concern
Jan'01 - Sep'04
14
No. of Failures
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 LB1 LB2 LB3 LB4 LB5 LB6 RB1 RB2 RB3 RB4 RB5 RB6 Fuel Line Location All Industrials Euclid-Hitachi
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
No. of Failures
SDMO (PG)
Percentage of Industrial Engines Failed vs. Industrial Engines Built (by Ship Date)
30
Percentage of Failures
25
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
No. of Engines
May-98
May-99
May-00
May-01
May-02
May-03
May-04
Jan-98
Jan-99
Jan-00
Jan-01
Jan-02
Jan-03
Sep-98
Sep-99
Sep-00
Sep-01
Sep-02
Sep-03
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Jan-04
n98
n99
n00
n01
n02
n03
n04
Percentage of Euclid-Hitachi Engines Built vs. EuclidHitachi Engines Failed (by Ship Date)
16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan- Jan- Jan- Jan- Jan- Jan- Jan- Jan98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Engine Ship Date
Percentage of Failures
No. of Engines
Jul-98
Jul-99
Jul-00
Jul-01
Jul-02
Jul-03
Jan-98
Jan-99
Jan-00
Jan-01
Jan-02
Jan-03
Jan-04
Jul-04
LB#2
Conclusions
Clearly Euclid-Hitachi is failing many more fuel lines than any other customer One potential cause is 2100 rpm operating speed RB#3 Fuel Line appears to have a much higher failure rate than any others (both Power Generation & Industrial)
CKEC Failure
CKEC failed RB#3 Industrial Fuel Line during 500 Hour Stop Cycle Endurance Testing (Test consists of 4 minutes at 2100rpm & 3000ft-lbs) CKEC failure examined and root cause was high cycle bending fatigue
Original
R3
Improved R3 Clamping
2.24
Passed
1.91
Passed
*Adding this additional brace will require the turbocharger supply line be rerouted behind the fuel injector drain line