Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formalization refers to degree to which jobs within organization are standardized Job holder has minimum amount of discretion over what is to be done or how should it be done Job descriptions are more explicit, lots of organizational rules and clearly defined work procedures
ECONOMICS OF FORMALIZATION
Since greater formalization requires less discretion it has cost implications When organization uses less formalization then decisions has to be made by individual. This implies organization will need to hire employees who have more managerial and decision making capabilities
This will have repercussions on compensation and wages Further, suppose wrong decision is taken by a manager, say purchasing manager in a plant then more cost will be incurred in logistics and procurement as well as more compensation that a manager is already charging
However, organization can choose between professional formalization and within organization formalization Formalization can be carried out by rules, regulations, policies and procedures
CENTRALIZATION
Refers to extent to which decision making is concentrated to a single point or level in organization thus permitting employees (usually low in the organization) minimum input into their work. The more learning, knowledge-based work, and knowledge sharing present in the organization, the more decentralized and flatter the organization can become
To shift the locus of decision-making from the top to the bottom of the organization, firms should achieve a high level of horizontal integration cross-functional groups and teams, which is a characteristic of high level of horizontal integration, make effective decisions rapidly.
Manufacturing practices such as reengineering setups, establishing preventive maintenance programs, and creating quality improvement efforts can be facilitated when firms give shop-floor employees discretion in decision-making and are involved in problem solving
COMPLEXITY
Refers to level of differentiation that exists within organization Differentiation occurs at three levels: horizontal, vertical and spatial Specialization and departmentalization are two special cases of horizontal differentiation Vertical differentiation refers to level and number of layers in the organization
Departmentalization lowers network density by reducing ties between actors across department boundaries Density also falls with greater vertical complexity because additional supervisory layers separate actors as rigid lines of authority limit direct ties.
Because a departmentalized in organizational structure isolates employees from interdepartmental connectedness, it damages the efficiency and speed of the decision-making and problem-solving processes
organizations with high structural differentiation had more elaborated administrative apparatus and wide power bases
If differentiation is accompanied by integration then structure becomes more complex Thus cross functional teams consisting of functional experts and accompanied by high coordination and knowledge sharing will have complex structure
High horizontal differentiation Rigid hierarchical relationships Fixed duties High formalization Formalized communication channels Centralized decision authority
Low horizontal differentiation Collaboration (vertical and horizontal) Adaptable duties Low formalization Informal communication Decentralized decision authority
14
Organization Structure
General manager
Finance
Human resources
Operations
Product marketing
Functional Design
Potential Benefits
Potential Pitfalls
Supports skill specialization Reduces duplication of resources & increases coordination Enhances career development & training within functional area Allows superiors and subordinates to share common expertise Promotes high-quality technical decision making
Inadequate communication Difficulties with interunit coordination Focus on departmental rather than organizational issues and goals
16
H. J. Heinz s OS
CEO
PDM
PDM
PDM
PDM
Product Design
Potential Benefits
Potential Pitfalls
Permits fast changes in a product line Allows greater product line visibility Fosters a concern for customer demand Clearly defines responsibilities for each product line Develops managers who can think across functional lines
Not allowing efficient utilization of skills and resources Not fostering coordination of activities across product Encourages politics and conflicts in resource allocation across product lines Limits career mobility for personnel outside their own product lines
18
Organizational Structure
S.B.U. General manager
Sales/marketing
Information technology
Finance
Human Resources
Operations
Health Sales Marketing Information technology Installation and repair Network operations
Financial services Sales Marketing Information technology Installation and repair Network operations
Governments Sales Marketing Information technology Installation and repair Network operations
Apples OS
CE0
Apple Products
Apple USA
Apple Europe
Europe West Europe North
Apple Pacific
Canada
Australia
France
Japan
South Europe
Geographical Design
Potential Benefits
Potential Pitfalls
Able to develop expertise in solving problems unique to one location Gaining an understanding of customers problems and desires Getting production closer to raw materials and suppliers
Duplication of functions, to varying degrees, at each regional or individual unit location Conflict between each location's goals and the organization's goals Adds levels of management and extensive use of rules and regulations to coordinate and ensure uniformity of quality among locations
21
Functions
Matrix
Product Division Product Division Product Division
INDIVIDUALIST/ SPECIALIST
TEAM/ GENERALIST
Team Approach
Cross-functional teams consist of employees from various functional departments Interdisciplinary approach to management Permanent team = to solve ongoing problems
25
Team Approach
Potential Benefits
Potential Pitfalls
Enhances flexibility and innovation Reduced barriers among departments Quicker response time Better morale
Co-ordination and control problems Time and resources spent on meetings Unplanned decentralization.
26