You are on page 1of 41

General Principles of

Law of Contract
Dr. R. Rajesh Babu

Introduction
o Fundamental to all business/commercial transactions o The Indian Contract Act,1872 creates an obligation between the parties and not against the whole world (right in personam). o The Act lays down the general principles relating to formation, performance and enforceability of contracts and the rules relating to certain special types of contracts like, Indemnity and Guarantee; Bailment and Pledge, and Agency o Separate enactments: The Partnership Act; the Sale of Goods Act; the Negotiable Instruments Act.

What is a Contract?
A contract is An agreement enforceable by law
Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other is an agreement.

A promises B a laptop. B promises Rs. 10 and A agrees. Is this a contract or an Agreement?

All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts.

Conditions for enforceability


All agreements are contracts, if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. (S. 10)

Essential elements of Contract:


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Offer and Acceptance Consideration Capacity to enter into contract Free consent of the parties and Lawful object of the agreement

1. Offer and Acceptance


Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1892).

1.1 Specific and General Offer


Specific Offer:
made to a specified person or a group of persons - can be accepted only by the person to whom made.

General Offer: made to the world at large.


can be accepted by anyone by complying with the terms of the offer.

Offer may be express or implied

1.2 Offer vs. Invitation to offer


Taxi for hire. Prospectus issued by a company. Tenders - bid Price-catalogues, price lists, quotations Display of goods with a price-tag in a shop window. E-commerce eg. www.shoppersstop.com

1.3 Acceptantce
Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified (counter-offer) Acceptance must be communicated to the person making the offer (in the manner mentioned eg email/fax) Would silence imply acceptance? Eg. Discount on DVD for CC holder. Duty to deny? Offer and acceptance can be revoked by notice, expiry of time (reasonable time)

1.3 The Postal Rule (mailbox rule)


Day 1: Ramesh makes an offer to Suresh. Day 2: Ramesh decides to revoke the offer and puts a letter in the mail to Suresh. Day 3: Suresh puts a letter accepting the offer in the mail. Day 4: Suresh receives Ramesh's revocation letter.

The letter of revocation can be effective only when received, that is Day 4. However, a contract was formed on Day 3 when the letter of acceptance was posted. It is too late for Ramesh to revoke the offer. Acceptance is from the date of letter not when offeror opens. Acceptance is complete as soon as the letter is put into the box. Telephone, fax, telex, email?

2. Consideration
An agreement made without consideration is void (Sec 25) Consideration means something which is of some value in the eye of law Consideration must be mutual. Both parties must receive something of value. Involvement of money is not required. It may be: the promisee has done or abstained from doing; or promises to do or abstain from doing; Including - forbearance, deteriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken

2.1 Movement of consideration

Consideration must move from the promisee. If consideration moves from a third party? Consideration need not be adequate: A contract to sell horse worth Rs. 50000 for Rs. 1000? Whether consent is freely given? coercion, fraud, mistake! Forbearance to sue! Sufficient consideration? BUT consideration must be sufficient, i.e. not: performance of a public duty or a duty imposed by law performance of a previous contractual obligation

Promise to pay less than amount due no consideration. Part payment as full discharge.

2.2 Consideration

Not illusory: An agreement will not be enforced if the consideration is so vague as to be illusory. o Eg. A promises to give B his Rolls Royce car if he fetch it from garage o Vijaya Minerals Pvt. Ltd v. Bikash Chandra Deb (1996): Agreement to sell manganese and iron ore price in agreement only 16% of the current market value. o Bank of India v. Swaranakar (SC 2003) Agreement against revocation VRS once applied cannot withdraw promise to keep an offer open needs consideration to make it binding

2.3 Exceptions to consideration


Mutual love and affection- Any agreement, made without consideration, is valid if it is made on account of natural love and affection between the parties, standing in near relation to each other, provided it is expressed in writing and it is registered under the law. Promise to compensate for something done: Any agreement, made without consideration, is valid if it is a promise to compensate a person, who has already voluntarily done something for the person making the promise. Promise to pay a debt, barred by Limitation law: Any promise, made in writing and signed to pay a debt, is binding on the person signing it even though it may be barred by the law of limitation.

2.4 Test cases


1. A, promises, for no consideration, to give to B Rs 1000. 2. A, for natural love and affection, promises to give his son, B, Rs. 1000. 3. A, finds Bs purse and give it him. B promises to give Rs. 50. 4. A owes B Rs. 1000, but the debt is barred by limitation Act. A signs a written promise to pay B Rs. 500. 5. Agreement to swim and cross Ganga for Rs. 1000.

3. Free and Genuine Consent


Two or more people are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense. However, if the consent is obtained through: Coercion undue influence (dominate the will of the other and obtain unfair advantage) fraud misrepresentation mistake Contract induced due to coercion, fraud, or misrepresentation is voidable. Where both parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void

Workmen of Appin Tea Estate vs. Industrial Tribunal (1966): The demand of the workers for bonus was accepted after a threat of strike. The question was, whether such a decision between the Union of the workers and the Indian Tea Association could be declared void on the ground that there was coercion?
It was held that because of the doctrine of collective bargaining under the Industrial Dispute Act the demand of the workers could be backed by a threat of strike. Such a threat was neither a threat to commit an offence under the IPC, nor was it unlawful detaining or threatening to detain any property and hence it did not amount to coercion, and as such the agreement was valid. Statutory Compulsion is no coercion

Shri Krishan Vs. Kurushetra University 1976 SC, ShriKrishan, acandidate for the LL.B. Part I exam, who was short in attendance, did not mention that fact in the admission form for the exam. Neither the Head of the law department nor the University authorities made proper scrutiny to discover the truth. Has he committed fraud? It was held by the Supreme Court that there was no fraud by the candidate and the University had no power to withdraw the candidature of the candidate. Silence is no fraud

4. Parties competent to contract


The following persons are incompetent to contract Minors Persons of unsound mind Persons disqualified by law to which they are subject (insolvent) According to the Law, a person is of sound mind for the purpose of contracting if at the time of contracting, he is capable of understanding the contract and capable of making a rational judgment as to the effects of the contract upon his interests. In India, a contract done by a minor or person of unsound mind is absolutely void ab initio.

5. Lawful object
The object is unlawful if It is forbidden by law, Is of such a nature if permitted it would defeat the provisions of any law, It is fraudulent The court regards it immoral, The court regards it opposed to public policy. Thus every agreement of which the consideration or object is unlawful is void.

Dixon v Francis [1956-60]


o The Appellant agreed that the Respondent would have the right to live in her house and occupy the garage free of cost so long as he and his wife live together in peace. Is this agreement valid or void for uncertainty? o Held: In order to constitute a valid contract the parties must so express themselves that their meaning can be determined with a reasonable degree of certainty. The words so long as he and his wife live together in peace are uncertain and the proviso is void. o The language used was so obscure and so incapable of any definite or precise meaning that the court is unable to attribute to the Parties any particular contractual intention.

Classification according to validity


Voidable contract: An agreement enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto., but not at the option of the other.

Eg: Consent obtained by force.


Void agreement: An agreement not enforceable by law is void.

Void contract: A contract ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable.

Void Agreements
o Agreement without consideration is void o Agreement in restraint of marriage is void o Agreement in restraint of trade o Non-compete Agreements? o partial and not total; unreasonable; public interest o Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings o Agreements by way of wager/ bet. Wager contract is one in which parties professing opposing views on the result of an uncertain event, mutually agree that depending on the outcome of such event, one will pay or hand over a sum of money or other stake. o Section 294-A , IPC

Agreements by way of wager, void :S. 30


Subhash K. Manwani v. State of MP (2000) MP HC... .to treat an agreement by way of wager as void, is that the law discourages people to enter into games of chance and make earning by trying their luck instead of spending their time, energy and labour for more fruitful and useful work for themselves, their family and society. Exceptions: (1) Horse racing; (2) Prize competitions : The Prize Competitions Act, 1955; (3) contests, where the results are based predominantly on skill, rather than on mere chance; (4) Lotteries sanctioned by specific legislation.

Prenuptial Agreements

Privity of Contract
Only a Party to a Contract (not a stranger) can sue on it. The contract can confer rights or impose obligations only on the parties to the contract. There are two aspects of this doctrine. 1.Only parties to the contract are entitled under it. Rights or benefits may be conferred upon a third party but such a third party can neither sue under the contract nor rely on defenses based on the contract. 2.Secondly the parties to a contract cannot impose liabilities on a third party

Exceptions to Privity Rule


Agency: The rule here is that if one of the contracting parties contracts as an agent, then either the agent or the principal, but not both, can sue to enforce the contract. Trusts: The law of trusts can enable a third party beneficiary to initiate action that will enforce the promisors obligation. Consumer contacts

Conclusion of a Contract: Discharge,


Frustration, Breach and Damages

Discharge of a contract
It means that the contract has been performed and is no longer a pending legal obligation. A contract may be discharged by: 1. Performance 2. Termination by time 3. Mutual agreement - by novation, alteration or recession (Sec.62), remission or waiver (Sec.63). 4. Operation of law 5. Impossibility of performance (ss 37-67) 6. Breach of contract

3. Discharge by Mutual Agreement


Parties are free to mutually abandon, modify or rescind the contract and the original contract need not be performed. Sec. 62 (i) Novation - replacing party/contract (substantial
alteration)

(ii) Rescission: - discharge of both parties from the


obligations of a contract by agreeing to rescind the contract.

(iii) Alteration must be a material alteration Remission or waiver: A owes B 27 lakhs. A pays Rs. 20
lakhs and B accepts in satisfaction of his full claim on A.

4. By operation of law
1. Material alteration;

2. Merger of an inferior contract into a superior contract;


3. Discharge of an insolvent; 4. When rights and liabilities under the same contract become vested in the same person

5. Impossibility or Frustration of Contract: Legal Excuses


The general rule followed in most jurisdictions is that performance under a contract will only be excused in extreme circumstances or when the performance falls under a legally recognized excuse from performance. Impossibility; Subsequent Illegality; Acts of God/Nature; Death of a Party; Destruction; War

Contract not frustrated by mere commercial difficulty: Merely because the procurement of the goods becomes difficult because of a strike in the mill, or there is a rise in prices, or a person will not be able to earn the expected amount of profits, is not enough to frustrate the contract. Benefits from void contracts: When an agreement is discovered to be void, or when a contract becomes void, any person who has received any advantage under such agreement or contract is bound to restore it, or to make compensation for it, to the person from whom he received it

5.1 Impossibility of Performance or Frustration of contract


Initial impossibility: An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void
A agrees B to discover treasure by magic. The agreement is void. The performance of the agreement being

impossible, the agreement is void.

Subsequent Impossibility: Performance of contract was quite possible when it was made, but some subsequently event rendered its performance impossible or unlawful.
A contracts to take in cargo for B at a foreign port. As Government afterwards declares war against the country in which the port is situated. The contract become void when war is declared.

6. Breach or non-Performance of contract


Breach of contract is failure of a party to perform his obligations under a contract. When one party commits a breach, the other party can claim damages or specific performance. The breach of contract may be: Actual breach of contract, or Anticipatory or constructive breach of contract.

when a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing his promise in its entirety

6.1 Effect of anticipatory breach


Case: In Frost Vs. Knight (1872) the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff on the defendants fathers death. While defendants father was, still alive, he renounced the contract. The plaintiff did not wait till the defendants fathers death and immediately sued him, and she was successful in her action. The aggrieved party may decide to ignore the anticipatory breach, and wait for the due date. Doctrine of anticipatory breach does not apply to promises to pay debts under promissory notes and bonds.

6.2 Remedies for breach of contract


The aggrieved party may:

Cancel the contract which will relieve him from all contractual obligations (rescission) Cover and receive damages. Demand specific performance Demand injunction. Recover any consideration given to the breaching party (restitution) Recover proportionate payment for the work done (Quantum Meruit).

7. Damages/Compensation for breach


Damages are monitory compensation for the losses suffered or gains prevented due to the breach. Types of Damages: Vindictive or exemplary damages - punitive damages. e.g.. for dishonor of cheque. Compensatory damages- general damages and special damages. Nominal damages Liquidated damages and penalty Civil jail?

Remoteness of damage Hadley vs. Baxendale rule


On the breach of a contract such damages can be recovered, (1) as may fairy and reasonably be considered arising naturally, i.e., according to the usual course of things from such breach, OR (2) as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract. The principle stated in the two branches of the rule is virtually the rule of reasonable foresight. The liability of the party making the breach of contract depends on the knowledge, imputed or actual, of the loss likely to arise in case of breach of contact.

Suit for specific performance


The Specific Relief Act, 1877 gives the court discretionary powers to order specific performance instead of or in addition to damages. The powers are subject to Sec.14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877. Suit for injunction: Injunction is an order of the court restraining a person from doing something which he promised not to do. This remedy is available where the contract contains a negative stipulation.

You might also like