Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nama Lahir Alamat Istri Anak/Mantu/Cucu Pendidikan : : : : : : I Gede Arinton Singaraja, 1 Januari 1950 Jl. Pramuka 249 Purwokerto 1 5/3/3 1. dr. umum FK. UNUD 1977 2. dr. SpPD FK. UNDIP 1987 3. MKom STIBBi Jkt 1999 4. MMR UNSUD 2005 5. KGEH FK. UI 2007 6. Doktor Ilmu Kedokteran UNDIP 2008 : Bag. Penyakit. Dalam RSUD. Margono Soekarjo/FKIK Unsud Purwokerto Pelatihan Endoscopy di RSU dr. : 1. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. 2. International Endoscopy Workshop 2007, Jakarta 5 7 April 2007. 3. Training Endoscopy Showa University Yokohama 2009
Introduction
Prevalence CH - increased from 9%
(1996)-18.5% (2006)
Longitudinal studies VE &/or
Introduction
Baveno IV - Status classification of cirrhosis : Stage 1: no varices, no ascites
Introduction
Mortality : 20%
Risk of rebleeding if no Th/ 60%
predictor
No other factors
Prophylaxis
Primary Secondary
Prophylaxis
Venodilators nitrates Shunting
Splanchnic vasocon. : vasopressin & ana. somatostatin & ana NSBB
STE EVL
Pre-Primary
1. Pre-primary prophylaxis
(prevention of the formation of
varices)- Baveno V :
An important area of research Predictive HVPG>10 mm Hg
Primary
1. Pre-primary prophylaxis
Experimental studies NSBB reduce portal pressure but insufficient evidence
Groszmann et al,2005
Primary
2. Primary prophylaxis :
All cirrhotic patients should be screened for varices at diagnosis :
Endos.- gold standard Non invasive
Endoscopic Dx
The risk of bleeding is related to:
the size of varices the presence of red signs Child-Pugh score
the size of
varices
(the Italian
Liver
Medium 25-50% lumen
Cirrhosis
Project)
Large >50% lumen
red wale
markings
Baveno IV :
All CH endos. - screened
VE.
23 yrs intervals VE. <-> 12 yrs small varices
However-endoscopy :
High costs
recommended in
everyday clinical practice
31.Giannini et al,2003 32. Giannini et al,2006. 33. Thabut et al, 2006 44. Burton et al, 2007. 45.Berzigotti et al, 2008
Transient elastography
CT scanning
35. Kim et al, 2007. 40.Kim et al, 2007. 47. Perri et al, 2008.
36. Eisen et al, 2006. 37.Lapalus et al, 2006. 38.Groce et al, 2007. 39.de Franchis et al, 2008. 48.Pena et al, 2008.
risk :
Red mark or
CP - C score
CONCLUSION: This trial suggests that propranolol administration cannot be recommended for the prevention of the development of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis; thus other studies are needed in selected subgroups of patients. Baveno V -- NSBB
Conclusion:
1.EVL >superior BB
Primary Prophylaxis
Conclusions Patients with contraindications, intolerance or not responding to beta-blockers treated with band ligation achieve protection from variceal bleeding comparable to that of good responders to betablockers.
Secondary Prophylaxis
If untreated- risks of :
Rebleeding 63%
Death 33%
- recommendation -
Secondary Prophylaxis
Baveno V :
Transplantation
Algorithm
de Franchis,2010
Summary
VE bleeding - C/ PH
Summary
The most important predictors:
Variceal size
The presence of red wale
markings
The severity of liver
dysfunction(ChildPugh score)
Summary
Endoscopic variceal ligation--
alternative to NSBB
Pharma. & endos. Th/ - fail-TIPS or transplantation
Thank You