Presentation by

Md. Abdul Jabbar

Md. Mahamud Hasan SK Sajedur Rahman Md. Ali Hossen H.m. Zahid Hasan

ID: 112051048
ID: 112051024 ID: 112051025 ID: 113051054 ID: 113051010

COURSE CODE : HRM 508 MBA PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF LIBERAL ARTS BANGLADESH APRIL 23, 2013

PRESENTATION ON
BA N G L A D E S H A N D M YA N M A R C O N F L I C T ISSUE

A) PERSONALITY ANALYSIS OF MYANMAR OFFICIALS

In point of view, the source of energy Myanmar the Extroversion, tend to verbalize much of what they observe and judge. They would rather talk then listen. Actually they dont came to common ground that why they demanding more, they reject their smuggling issue and the negotiation talk place for 4th time.

Style of structuring or interacting with outside the world Myanmar is judger and they prefer a structured, scheduled, ordered, planed and controlled environment. If they fix anything then they defiantly do that.
3

CONTINUE
Style of processing information Myanmar is thinker, they prefer to be detached analytical in making decisions. They try to use objective criteria and guideline and thats why they want to free-rein inside from Bangladesh to free the prisoner and thus people are mostly belong to fishing trade. Manner of taking information

Myanmar belongs to be sensing and they are practical, realistic for their countrys
economic and political benefit. Thats why they reject their smuggling issue. Type A

Myanmar belongs to type A because they are very much competitive approach
toward their goals. So their personality type ESTJ.
4

B) IDENTIFY THE NATURAL OF CONFLICT

Myanmar belongs to destructive conflict because they generally negative, avoidant or competitive approach towards the conflict.

C) NEGOTIATION STYLE TO BE ADOPTED BY THE BD OFFICIAL

BD Official should adopted collaborative style, this reasons is that This style most creatively and most effective BD official. This type of negotiation is consistent with win win approach. BD behavior is listening and expressing felling and desire. BD Official natural strongly influenced views to conflict and personality. BD Official try to solved border and anti-smuggle issue. BD official find Myanmar official actual wants. If BD Official see Myanmar official general attitude toward conflict is positive, we are likely to be able to adopt a collaborative style.

D) STRATEGY WE FOLLOW FOR BD OFFICIAL

We should GRIP the problem We ranking and analysis the strategy as like G + I+ R + P

G goal strategy for: We know that between 2 countrys problem if long time sustain both country affected. So negation should manage as soon as possible. No country takes illegal advantage from Bangladesh. So fair and legal strongly negation with Myanmar I goal for: Stop all smuggling and Drug-dealing. Ensure safety for Bangladeshis national civilized people and protection.
R goal strategy for: Keep friendship with near country Myanmar and Increase trade. P goal strategy for: less compromise when we do the negation give Myanmar some advantage also makes sure fulfill our demand. Internationally Bangladesh will if they have negative approach.
7

E) KEY NEGOTIATION TEMPERAMENTS FOR BOTH BANGLADESH AND MYANMAR OFFICIALS

Key negotiating temperaments for Bangladesh officialsAs a BD officials perspective, the Key negotiating temperaments is CONTROLLER. In a CONTROLLER point of view, Focus Rohinga Repatriation as well as discuss multiple issues. Organizing information into concepts and theories. Approach all the issue with a broad perspective. See the interrelatedness of matters and hold strong opinion. Organized plan and patient for decision and resolution.

Be practical and realistic.

Dont loss of control and view things as fixed. Dont seek conflict but seek harmony. At last figured out a concrete and tangible result that both parties are winwin situation and keep the friendship with neighboring country.

As a Myanmar officials perspective, the Key negotiating temperaments is ACTION SEEKER. In an ACTION SEEKER point of view, See detail, focus on specific matter. Approaches things sequentially. Defer decision and adapt new information. Utilize facts and figure. Dont loss of control over the matters. Figured out a concrete and tangible result.
9