Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Ethics
Good Ethics Means Good Business Good Business results in Good Ethics
Ethics - Study of what is good and evil, right and wrong, and just and unjust
Choices about what law permits and whether to follow it or not Choices about economic & social issues outside the domain of law Choices about the priority of self-interest over the companys interests
Business Ethics
ETHICS TEST
Ethics should be taught at home and in the family, not in professional or higher education. 1 2 3 4
I consider money to be the most important reason for working at a job or in an organization. 1 2 3 4 Acting ethically at home and with friends is not the same as acting ethically on the job. 1 2 3 4 Lying is usually necessary to succeed in business. 1 2 3 4 I would hide truthful information about someone or something at work to save my job. 1 2 3 4
Business Ethics
Business Ethics
How will my own and my organizations core values and beliefs be affected or changed by my decision?
Business Ethics
12
Regions of Country
Family
Profession
The Individual
Conscience Friends Employer
The Law
Religious Beliefs
Society at Large
Business Ethics
8.
14
Business Ethics
To gain goodwill of the Community To create an organization that operates consistently To produce good business To protect the organization and its employees from legal actions To avoid unfavourable publicity
15
Business Ethics
Principles
Treat colleagues, customers, consumers with respect Strive to be the best at what matters most to the Company
Business Ethics
Billions of dollars each year in lawsuits and settlements Deterioration of relationships Damage to reputation Declining employee productivity, creativity, and loyalty Ineffective information flow throughout the organization Absenteeism and turnover Theft
17
Business Ethics
How to make decisions which would matter or have an impact. How to decide what is right: Morally Economically Socially Legally Ethically
18
When business people speak about Business Ethics they usually mean one of three things:
Avoid breaking the criminal law in ones work-related activity Avoid action that may result in civil law suits against the company/organisation/business entity
Strong version of this profit approach takes a reverse strategy and maintains that, in a competitive and free market, the profit motive will in fact bring about a morally proper environment. That is, if customers demand safe products, or workers demand privacy, then they will buy from or work for only those businesses that meet their demands. Businesses that do not heed these demands will not survive.
But this strong view also has problems, since it assumes that consumers or workers will demand the morally proper thing. In fact, consumers may opt for less safe products if they know they will be saving money. For example, consumers might prefer a cheaper car without air bags, even though doing so places their own lives and the lives of their passengers at greater risk, which is morally irresponsible. Workers may forgo demands of privacy at work place if they are compensated with high enough wages
Not every moral business practice will simply emerge from the
Profit Principle
A morally responsible company must pay special attention to product safety, environmental impact truthful advertising, scrupulous marketing, and humane working conditions
Morally Conscientious business-related laws vs Less Sophisticated Laws & Regulatory Agencies
Attraction of these principles is that they appeal to universal moral notions that no one would reasonably reject
Problem with these principles is that they are too general. These principles do not tell us specifically : what counts as harm, unfairness, or a violation of human rights. Does all damage to the environment constitute harm? Does it violate an employee's right to privacy if an employer places hidden surveillance cameras in an employee lounge area? Does child-oriented advertising mislead children and thus violate the principle of veracity?
These principles are abstract in nature. That is, they broadly mandate against harm, and broadly endorse autonomy. Because they are abstract, they will be difficult to apply to concrete situations and consequently not give clear guidance in complex situations.
An alternative approach:
Is to forget the abstract, and focus instead on concrete situations that affect the particular interests of consumers, workers, stockholders, or the community. It may be expressed in the following: Stakeholder principle: businesses should consider all stakeholders' interests that are affected by a business practice. Accordingly, the stakeholder approach to business ethics emphasizes that we should map out of the various parties affected by a business practice.
But how to prioritize the various interests once we map them out. Should all stakeholders' interests be treated equally from the largest stockholder down to the garbage man who empties the factory waste?
Business Ethics
33
Business Ethics
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
Should managers pay attention to the needs of these Stakeholders? What priority should they have?
34
Business Ethics
SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS
Local community groups Special-interest groups Consumer groups Environmental groups Media Society-at-large Should managers pay attention to the needs of these groups? What priority should they have?
35
An alternative approach:
Is to forget the abstract, and focus instead on concrete situations that affect the particular interests of consumers, workers, stockholders, or the community. It may be expressed in the following: Stakeholder principle: businesses should consider all stakeholders' interests that are affected by a business practice. Accordingly, the stakeholder approach to business ethics emphasizes that we should map out of the various parties affected by a business practice.
But how to prioritize the various interests once we map them out. Should all stakeholders' interests be treated equally from the largest stockholder down to the garbage man who empties the factory waste?
INTEGRATED APPROACH
Laws are insufficient and do not cover all aspects or gray areas of a problem. Free-market and regulated-market mechanisms do not effectively inform owners and managers about how to respond to complex crises
An moral code (eg: Johnson & Johnson Credo) ; Companys way of doing Business can save the day for any Business entity
6-14
UTILITARIANISM
JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873) ACTIONS ARE RIGHT IN PROPORTION AS THEY TEND TO PROMOTE HAPPINESS, WRONG AS THEY TEND TO PROMOTE THE REVERSE OF HAPPINESS
Principle of Utility:
The best action is that which produces the greatest happiness and/or reduces pain
Greatest Happiness:
We ought to do that which produces the greatest happiness and least pain for the greatest number of people
Act:
An Action is right if and only if it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the greatest number. (Jeremy Bentham)
Rule:
An action is right if and only if it conforms to a set of rules the general acceptance of which would produce the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the greatest number. (John Stuart Mill)
UTILITARIANISM
What makes an action right or wrong is the good or evil that is produced by the act
Action is right if it produces the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all parties affected It involves the consideration of alternatives and how they affect all parties concern
RIGHTS
Rights Play an important role in Business Ethics; for Employers and Employees, both Employers - conduct the business as they deem fit -make their decisions on hiring & promotions
Customers and General Public also have rights; mkt, advertising, product safety & protection of environment
VIRTUES ETHICS
Business Related Character Traits; every day life virtues may not
wholly applicable to business. Caring, Honesty not the same as in other sphere of life
RIGHTS
RIGHTS
A) You attempt to help an elderly man across the street. He gets across safely. Conclusion: the Act was a good act.
B) You attempt to help an elderly man across the street. You stumble as you go, he is knocked into the path of a car, and is hurt. Conclusion: The Act was a bad act.
If you can use eighty soldiers as a decoy in war, and thereby attack an enemy force and kill several hundred enemy soldiers, that is a morally good choice even though the eighty might be lost. If lying or stealing will actually bring about more happiness and/or reduce pain, Act Utilitarianism says we should lie and steal in those cases.
decision was made not to inform the town that they would be bombed.
The Ford Pinto case: A defective vehicle would sometimes explode when hit.
The
model was not recalled and repaired by Ford because they felt it was cheaper to pay the liability suits than to recall and repair all the defective cars.
CRITICISMS OF UTILITARIANISM
If I am to bring the greatest happiness to the greatest number, not putting my own happiness above others, that may lead to a dilemma. I live in a neighborhood where 83% of my neighbors use drugs. I could make them most happy by helping supply them with cheap drugs, but I feel uncomfortable doing that. What should a utilitarian do?
CRITICISMS OF UTILITARIANISM
Utilitarianism plays fast and loose with Gods commandments. If lying, stealing, or killing could lead to an increase of happiness for the greatest number, we are told we should lie, steal or kill. Isnt that a rejection of Gods commands?
BENTHAMS CALCULUS
In determining the quantity of happiness that might be produced by an action, we evaluate the possible consequences by applying several values: - Intensity - duration - certainty or uncertainty - propinquity or remoteness - fecundity - purity - extent.
sides.
For example, some might find happiness with a pitcher of Coke and a Pizza. Others may find happiness watching a fine Indian TV Drama. The quality of happiness is greater with the latter.
UTILITARIANISM
Major issues with utilitarianism
- Action that produces the greatest balance of
value for the greatest number of people What about the minority? What if society decides that it is in the best interest of the public to deny health insurance to those testing positive for AIDS?
UTILITARIANISM
Problems with Utilitarianism
Not always possible to calculate utility or to analyze massive amounts of information consider the case of oil rigs in Alaska - Ignores distribution of good is it uniformly distributed or favours specific groups? - No common definition of what is good? - Assumes that all can be measured in a common numerical scale
-
Conclusion. Weve looked at three approaches to business ethics, and weve seen that all three have limitations. If we hope to find an approach to business ethics that is free from conceptual problems, we will not likely find any. Ethics is a complex subject and its history is filled with diverse theories that are systematically refuted by rival theories. So, we should expect to find controversies when applying ethics to the specific practices of business. However, following any of the above three approaches to business ethics will bring us closer to acceptable moral behaviour than we might otherwise be. Close attention to ones profit motive and the moral interests of consumers might in fact generate some morally responsible business decisions. We can indeed find additional moral guidance by looking at the laws that apply specifically to businesses. In gray areas of moral controversy that are not adequately addressed profit motives and the law, we can turn for guidance to a variety of general and specific moral principles. In addition to the above three approaches to business ethics, it also helps to examine stories of businesses that have been morally irresponsible. By citing specific cases deceptive advertising, environmental irresponsibility, or unsafe products, we can learn by example what we should not do. Such cases often reveal blatantly crude, insensitive, or reckless attitudes of businesses, which we can view as warning signs of unethical conduct.
Business Ethics
Scandals
Excessive Salaries of CEOs and poor performance of firms Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Outsourcing trends
80
Business Ethics
81
Business Ethics
82
Utilitarianism Consequentianal
Universalism the means justify the ends of an action, not the consequences Rights based on entitlements and unquestionable claims
Many philosophers hold that we have certain rights, either from God, nature, or from a social contract Can the idea of rights be made compatible with Utilitarianism? If ignoring rights brings about more happiness to the greatest number, should we ignore so-called rights? Mills rule-based view in On Liberty; having a right to liberty will bring the greatest happiness
UTILITARIANISM
Essential Features
Utilitarianism is committed to the maximization of the good and minimization of harm and evil Society ought to produce the greatest balance of positive value or minimum balance of negative value for all affected
- Ex: Cost and benefit analysis - Risk assessment - Management by objectives
Efficiency is key
UTILITARIANISM
Involves the following steps:
Determining the alternative actions that are available in
any specific decision situation
Estimating the costs and benefits that a given action would produce for parties affected by the action
Choosing the alternative that produces the greatest sum of utility or least amount of disutility