Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behaviorist ideas of language learning Before 1960s -- study of child language dominated by behaviorist approach to language learning. Proponent -- B.F. Skinner wrote Verbal Behavior (1957) According to behaviorists, language is not a mental phenomenon: it is behavior.
It is behavior, learned by a process called habit-formation in which the main components are:
Child imitates the patterns and sounds
heard in the environment. Childs attempts similar to adult models and reinforced through approvals or positive feedback. Child repeats sound and patterns, so that these become habits.
Continuation...
conditioned or shaped until the habits become like adults. Childs own utterances seen as a faulty version of adult speech. Mistakes as results of imperfect learning.
views ---- strongly opposed by Chomskys linguistic theories & cognitive psychology
Arguments against...
knowledge of rules (or competence). (But not what theyre exposed to -exposed only to peoples speech or termed performance).
Process of extracting abstract knowledge from concrete examples cannot be explained by habit-formation.
Continuation...
3.
Rules are often reflected very indirectly in the actual surface structure of speech.
Continuation...
(I)
the question of other people pleasing John. (ii) John himself who wants to do the pleasing. Such information about deep relationships cannot be acquired simply by observing & imitating verbal behavior.
Continuation...
exceptional speed By the age of 3 1/2 and 5: normallyendowed children have internalized all the basic structures of their language (This cannot be explained by habitformation alone.)
Continuation...
speech, but they arrive at the same underlying rules as other children in the community. They pass through similar stages or sequences in acquiring these rules. Children seem to be constructing their own rule systems.
Continuation...
the adult system. i.e. Childs language is not simply shaped by external forces. Rather, creatively constructed by the child as s/he interacts with those around her/him.
An innate language-learning capacity? The factors outlined led people to believe that children are born with an innate capacity for acquiring language. Termed Language Acquisition Device or LAD
Characteristics of LAD
Specific to human species (homosapiens).
Never fails to operate in normal human beings
-- from infancy up to age 11 (debatable). Provides children a means of processing the speech in the environment; so that they can construct its underlying system. To enable it to operate so quickly, it may already contain some of the universal
Continuation...
features which are found in all known languages. E.g. use of word order to signal meaning, or basic grammatical relationships such as between subject and object. LAD as a term has lost its currency. Few people would question the basic notion: children possess an innate ability to acquire language.
Continuation...
The main debate -- the extent to which there is a specific capacity earmarked for language alone. The other argument --- language acquisition can be explained in terms of same cognitive capacity used by children in making sense of other aspects of their world.
Continuation...
Eg. Childrens ability to discover relationships between subject and object in grammar may originate in their general ability to perceive the world in terms of agents and objects of action. If there is a special language learning capacity-and if the capacity declines at about the age of 12 or so, this is significant in explaining why second language learning (L2 learning) is often difficult or even unsuccessful.
Examples: allgone sticky (after washing hands) allgone outside (after closing the door) more page (asking adult to continue reading) sweater chair (showing where the sweater is) Utterances are very reduced such that the situation plays an important role in conveying meaning.
Continuation...
Same two words may mean different things in different situations. E.g. mommy sock -- mothers socks
(possession) or when mother was dressing him (agent and object).
Even at this stage, language is used creatively (for they can never have heard
them before)
Continuation...
ability to combine items from a limited set to communicate meanings. Researchers try to write the grammars of childrens speech. Two main classes of words: a restricted pivot class and a larger open class
Continuation...
Another approach: focus on the meanings of the two-words Lois Bloom (1970): sentences containing two nouns used to express 5 kinds of relationships: 1. Conjunction (cup glass -- cup and glass) 2. Description (party hat - a party hat) 3. Possession (daddy hat - daddys hat)
Continuation...
4.
Dan Slobin (1979): studied communicative functions in children acquiring 6 different languages e.g.
Continuation...
2. Demanding or desiring (more milk, mehr Milch) 3. Negating (not hungry, Kaffee nein) 4. Describing an event or situation (block fall,
puppe kommt)
Continuation...
6. Describing
Milch Heiss)
Continuation...
inflections ( s in want and stand ; articles such as a or the. (These are morphemes.)
Roger Brown (1973) -- studied 3
Continuation...
Continuation...
6. Possessive s ( daddys hat ) 7. Uncontractible copula ( is in Yes, she is . ) 8. Articles the and a 9. Regular past tense: -ed ( She walked.) 10. Regular third-person singular s (She runs.)
Continuation...
does not correlate with order of acquisition, and cannot relate to habitformation.
He further added the idea of the child as
Continuation...
Childrens acquisition of verb inflections --evidence of their active contribution to the learning process. e.g. Where it goed? (Go + ed) [Where did it go?] It comed off. (Come + ed) [It came off. ]
Development of transformations
Children also learn to carry out
transformations of basic sentences to more complex sentences. E.g. Acquisition of negatives: 1. First, the negative element is simply attached to the beginning or end. E.g. No singing song. No the sun shining.
Continuation...
2. Second
Continuation...
3. At this stage, child begins to produce the appropriate part of do, be or the modal verb. E.g. You dont want some supper. Paul didnt laugh. I am not a doctor.
Continuation...
In interrogatives, children first produce sentences in which the internal structure is not affected.
In Yes/No questions, children use intonation. E.g. See hole? You cant fix it?
Continuation...
For Wh-interrogatives, the question word is placed in front of the sentence: Where daddy going? Why you caught it? Where my spoon goed?
Later, the use of inversion with the auxiliary do as in an adult system.
Later development
As the child grows, the limitations on his
Continuation...
i.e. after children have acquired the underlying concept of present relevance
Language-Learning Mechanism
The child has a number of operating
1. Avoid exceptions. 2. Underlying meaning-relationships should be marked clearly. -- This explains why the passive is more difficult than the active voice.
Continuation...
make semantic sense. Children look for a system which is: (a) rule-governed in a consistent way, (b) the clues to meaning are clearly displayed, and (c) where each item or distinction has a definite function in communicating meaning.
models for the child. E.g. caretaker speech Characteristics of caretaker speech: 1. Generally spoken more slowly and distinctly. 2. Contains shorter sentences. 3. More grammatical, and with fewer broken sentences.
Continuation...
4. Contains
fewer complex sentences: less variety of tenses range of vocabulary is limited more repetition speech related to the here and now More repetitions Caretaker speech helps children learn.
Because
important source of data to infer from in
studying how the second language or L2 is learned Information gleaned from L1 data e.g. errors, stages children go through, rules, structures, and words used; all provide rich information on how utterances are produced and understood evidence for HOW we learn language
THANK YOU
Thank You!