Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electrodermal Measurement
Galvanic skin response as indicative of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system Sweat glands provide a shunt between skin and deeper tissues Measures indicative of arousal, stress-strain, and emotion Autonomic habituation provides a physiological measure of information processing capacity needed to complete a task Used as measure of workload, mental strain, and emotional strain.
Procedure
Sampling across various locations of the body Typically 3-4 cm distance between electrodes sampling dc current using a bioampifier Sampling at 20hz sufficient to calculate Skin Conductive Response (SCR) Amplitude, rise time and recovery time are measured May be used to determine tonic Electrodermal Activity (EDA) to measure readiness for action
Advantages/Disadvantages
Easy to measure and interpret the physiological signal Pure measure of the sympathetic branch of the ANS Sensitivity to workload and emotional strain Somewhat difficult to record Prone to artifacts in nonlaboratory settings Indiscriminately sensitive to any ANS activity Several months of lab training to be able to use plus training for use in an ambulatory setting
Reliability/Validity
Short term reliability (within days) is fairly good (.80 to .90) Longer term reliability is more limited (.60) Tonic EDA more reliable than SCL (test-retest correlations of .76 and .61 at one year) Validity at or above .90 for EDA-Emotional strength in LAB setting No similar data for applied settings Validity based more on strength of emotion related to strain than physical relationship Heart rate and BP are yield better validity than EDA (.68 to .86)
Electromyography
Studies muscle function using electrical analysis of signals emanating at muscle contraction Motor activity
Anterior horn of the spinal cord, transmitted via alpha motor neurons to muscle Each muscle fiber consists of multiple chains of contractile sarcomeres (actin-myosin-filaments) These filaments create muscle contraction Motor unit chemically activates the muscle fibers connected as myoneural junction is depolarized (amplitude of about 100mV with a 2-14msec duration Muscle action potential causes sarcomeres to contract Electrodes in tissue or skin can measure these action potentials (electrolytic response)
EMG (continued)
Muscle force defined by motor units activated EMG forms a quasi-randomly shaped spikes of amplitude and duration but no identifiable sequence Correlation between number and intensity of generation of amplitude spikes and muscle contraction force Remember, doesnt measure force, joint position but rather voltage associated with local muscle recruitment
EMGs complemented by use of measures of external load, body posture, joint measurement EMGs can be performed with needle electrodes inserted into muscle or surface electrodes
Procedure
Placement of electrodes or needles in muscles, signal passed to preamplifier, processed with band-pass filters for frequencies related to muscular activity Select muscles related to action (may depend on how specific you want to be measuring potential between muscle and ground Amplify, filter and store results Signal Processing Scaling
Correlation between feedback control and execution speed during learning an assembly task
EMG Advantages/Disadvantages
Continuous and quantitative measured data High temporal resolution with marginal interference with task execution Allows detection of muscle fatigue at early stages providing objective measure Multi-channel EMG can identify muscular bottle-necks
Surface EMG limited to muscles directly beneath area accessed by skin electrode Only feasible for single muscles in individuals not too obese Requires careful calibration, instrumentation, data manipulation, and interpretation Setup is fairly time consuming Interpretation requires data analysis and data integration Calibration lacks reliability Requires individual calibration, poor reliability Needle method more specific but invasive and quite painful
Heart Rate/Variability
Various Measures
Electrocardiogram (ECG) Duration between heartbeats (HR) Mean heart period or Interbeat Interval (IBI) Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Normal Rhythm
Cardiac Sinusoidal Mode Modulated by innervations from the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the ANS
Heart Rate
Controlled by nuclei in the brain stem and guided by the hypothalamus and prefrontal cortical structures Two control modes
Parasympathetic (Vagal) and Sypathetic output (Pores (1995)) Mediation of bororeflex activity
Use of ECG
HRV related to changes in autonomic control Vagal Gating NSR is vagally determined HRV and other cardiovascular variables modulated by baroreflex gain. General cardiac response found in mental-effort studies characterized by increased HR and BP and decreased HRV and BP variability at all frequencies Compatible with fight-flight reaction (lab studies, shortlasting tasks, challenging mental operations in working memory. Mid freq. band most sensitive to variation in mental effort due to decreased vagal activation and increased sympathetic activation.
Procedure
Three or 7 lead methods Sampling and R-peak detection Artifact detection and Correction Spectral procedures HR, IBI or Normalized Values? Logarithmic Transformation
Disadvantages
HR and HRV used as indicators of mental effort
Higher invested effort, higher HR and lower HRV
Complex relationship between HR with baroreflex BP control and autonomous nervous activity
Most stable results only really found in lab settings Restrictions in sensitivity for artifacts in obtained IBI series and sensitivity for changes in respiration Artifact correction time consuming Newer technologies are mitigating some of these limitations
Methods
EEG sum of electrical brain activity
Recorded at scalp or needle electrodes When alertness falls, frequency of EEG falls and amplitude increases as more neurons synchronized to fire by the thalamus (rational behind EEG indicator of sleepiness)
Procedure/Example
See text for in depth discussion of procedure for setup and use of EEG and EOG. Example 12.1 shows EEG/EOG pattern in severe sleepiness performing a task and demonstrates beta activity, increased alpha activity, eye closure, slow eye rolling movements, and dozing off, reappearing beta activity, return of eye blinks
EEG/EOG Recording
Application/Training
Application takes 1530 minutes minimum for electrode placement Learning to setup takes 10-20 hours for reliable recording Scorring takes several months to learn Requires repeated quality checks
Reliability/Validity
No formal reliability established for ambulatory EEG methods Hard to define due to the definitions of the measures and the changing nature of the measure Several studies have defined validity between subjective sleepiness and sleepiness-impaired performance Purposeful interaction with the environment not possible when EEG dominated by alpha/theta and slow eye movements
Procedure
Experimental paradigm design Subject preparation Preparation of ERP data for analysis Component definition and pattern recognition Data analysis
Advantages/Disadvantages
We possess understanding concerning functional significance of different ERP components Brain regions from which component generated are known ERPs can be obtained in absence of operator action/performance Motion artifacts Require discrete stimulus or response Substantial training required for recording, analysis, interpretation
Training/Application Times
Depends on whether you want to learn the basics (2 months) or become knowledgeable about the basis of ERP signals (advanced degree) Application times from 15min for a few electrodes to 45min for large electrode array
Reliability/Validity
Validity of ERP components to specific cognitive constructs convincingly demonstrated Reliability established through extensive replications Split-half reliability high for P300 amplitude (.92) and latency (.83) Test-retest reliability over several days for P300 amplitude .83 and P300 latency .63
EEG/MEG/fMRI
Neural activity generates currents outside the skull which can be monitored by their electrical and magnetic fields
Electroencephalogram (EEG) Magnetoencephalogram (MEG) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Functional MRI (fMRI)
Provide a basis for examining the neural substrate of specific cognitive processes
MEG preferred for temporal resolution; fMRI for spatial resolution; and maximum information when/where the two methods can be combined. Limited to patients without ferromagnetic inserts
MEG/fMRI Mechanisms
Requires use of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) Exploit quantum mechanical Josephsoneffect Modern MEG systems monitor signals from 150300 SQUIDs spread equally over the head surface Variants of MEG sensors known as Gradiometers Spin tilt of protons aligned with strong magnetic field is pertubated by a brief electromagnetic pulse Protons emit burst of RF energy as they return to their initial aligned state Strength of signal with particular RF signature allows determination of proton density Helps define tissue characteristics at that location
Procedure (MEG)
Helmet like gantry placed over subjects head Coils fixed on head provide weak magnetic sources known as anatomical sites.
fMRI
Subject reclined on movable gantry, shifted into the bore of a magnet.
Structural scan Repeated functional scans
Experimental Setup
During session, sequence of visual or auditory or other sensory stimuli is presented to the subject who has to process them according to a predefined task. Often the same or similar stimuli are presented with slightly different task requirements Differences between the BOLD responses in the different experimental conditions are evaluated to determine what brain regions are specifically activated by a particular task or sensory input
MEGData Analysis
Event-locked epochs initially averaged separately for each subject, channel (sensor), task, or condition Epochs containing artifacts are rejected or correlated Grand average waveforms are scanned for components (peaks/troughs)(50-100msec) Time/amplitude measurements determined for each component, task, subject. Statistical analysis to ascertain significant differences which are localized to a region of the brain Various co registration techniques possible using nonlinear parameters, algorithms from chaos theory Analyzing continuous MEG data is based on chaos theory and beyond the scope of this class
Training
Predefined protocols performed by techs after two week training period For more advanced/sophisticated applications, at least one full time engineer or physicist should be available (6 month training). In clinical setting, support of a dedicated physician is required for data interpretation Neuroscientists should have a sound background in experimental design as well as neurophysiological education. Specific training per investigations being conducted Joint program between Emory and Georgia Tech provides degree and background in medical physics
Test Times
Experimental run may require about 1.5 hours with 15 minutes additional subject preparation
MEG Reliability/Validity
MEG
Artifacts can be minimized but not eliminated Raw signals, an experienced rater can recognize these distortions Potential artifacts depend on s/n Avoid misinterpretation of waveform Reasonable solutions possible but not foolproof. Reliability and validity rely on users experience
fMRI Reliability/Validity
fMRI
Continuous maintenance should result in acceptable raw images Artifacts due to discontinuities in magnetic susceptibility can lead to low structural distortions and signal loss Easily detected but not readily corrected Errors can be introduced to statistical analysis Even with formal fMRI handling correct, erroneous conclusions may be drown from data obtained using inappropriate experimental designs Reliability and validity of fMRI method also relies on user experience
Ambulatory BP
Developed clinically to measure physical work effects Increased use for psychosocial work characteristics Use of portable recorders for non-invasive recording
Procedure
Procure ABPM Device Select work analysis objective methods Develop prequestionnaire about normal activities Maintain diary Prepare BP monitor Fit monitor to subject Instruct subject Subject resumes daily routine Remove BP monitor, collect diaries Transfer data
Requirements
Must have information about body position and motor activity at time of measurement Also should combine measurement with psychological data Must assess the nature of strain Include measures of perceived mental load, perceived control, mood, motivation
Advantages/Disadvantages
Can simultaneously record workload and subjects strain experience & behavior Work-strain-related effects on BP recovery can be investigated and assessed ABPM can have an artifact effect on daily activity (Hawthorn type effect) May have an effect on subjects sleep
Training/Application
Investigator experienced in principles of BP measurement and interpretation of readings Main and artifact variables on BP Fitting takes 15-20 minutes Subject instruction about inflation/deflation of cuff Instruct subject on need for written diary Removal done by investigator with follow up
Growing use of these measures as humans subjected to 24 hour workdays Technological improvements are making measurement more affordable and less obtrusive PERCLOS
Procedure
Use infrared, retinal reflectance monitor Uses CCD camera to record eye closure measurements in real time General use of two cameras situated at 90 degree angle 850-nm filtered bright eye camera and a 950-nm filtered dark-eye (dark pupil) image Calculate the changes in brightness of pupil based on average brightness
Advantages/Disadvantages
Availability of on-line, nearreal-time, automated slow eyelid PERCLOS system unobtrusive to user Ideal if used with preset thresholds versus self-report Can be used as an investigative and applied tool. May not work in all situations (requires restricted FOV) May create artifacts in completion of task Equipment may be too obtrusive in mobile real-world applied environment Not ideal in low humidity environments (not able to differentiate moistening of eyes and fatigue based closure Misuse in safety sensitive environment may generate risk.
Training/Application
No training required other than to teach operator to interpret feedback indicating drowsiness Small, fairly easily applied and useful in many but not all environments
Reliability/Validity
Loss of alertness, drowsiness, and hypovigilance must be theoretically linked to performance deficits Two levels of validation
Biobehavioral parameters Specificity of biobehavioral measure used
Both reliability and validity must be established across dynamic range of performance
Human Respiration
Respiration linked to a variety of functional psychological dimensions
Response requirements Appraisal patterns Mental effort investment Various dimensions of emotion Affect Mood
Respiratory Measures
Assessment of how depth and frequency of breathing contributes to ventilation
Expressed as tidal volume Frequency is respiration rate (BPM)
Applications
Can be used with verbal self report related to work
Task demands System demands Operator workload Stressful/hazardous aspects of environment
Measurement/Procedure
Measure non-obtrusively motions of the rib cage and abdomen using an inductive respiratory plethysmography device Calibration techniques Often combined with other measures (accelerometry, ECG, oximetry, PetCO2 Research Design Prepare Subject Physiological Monitoring Data Acquisition/Analysis
Equipment
Advantages/Disadvantages
Valuable in applied studies of complex tasks/systems demands/effort investment Combines easily performance-based and subjective methods Demonstrates metabolic activity associated with task but may be affected by extraneous variables Respiration is intricate interplay between brainstem, metabolic, volitional influences Difficult to unravel May not be a convenient measure when interested in monitoring oxygen consumption Will the quantification of respiration answer the questions which researcher is interested in?
Training/Application
Considerable investment in time, effort, resources to familiarize oneself with the underlying physiology, measurement, analysis required Basics in a few weeks, expert knowledge much more time Application of sensors, calibration, signal quality verification varies from 10-30min.
Reliability/Validity
Problems with reliability related to posture changes, movement and respiration related movement Possible to filter some of these out but probably too complex for automatic filtering Measurement of PetCO2 may pose serious validity problems that need to be considered Breathing can vary widely and it may be difficult to correlate these changes to changes in work requirements