Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The research itself is described in Chapters 2 to 5 the research problem and propositions/ hypotheses arising from the body of knowledge developed during previous research (Chapter 2) methods used in this research to collect data about the hypotheses (Chapter 3) results of applying those methods in this research (Chapter 4) and conclusions about the propositions/hypotheses and research problem based on the results of Chapter 4, including their place in the body of knowledge outlined previously in Chapter 2 (Chapter 5)
DOCTORAL STUDY IS JOURNEY TO GET DOCTORAL DEGRE THE END OF RESEARCH STUDY
PHD NOT A TITLE TO GRATIFY ONES EGOTHE STAR ONLINE- TUESDAY NOVEMBER 30, 2010
It was reported that the number of PhD holders among academic staff in public universities had increased by 133% since 2005 and Higher Education Department director-general Datuk Dr Radin Umar Radin Sohadi said there were now 14,000 PhD holders compared to 6,000 in 2005. Of the 14,000, 60% were PhD holders in pure science, applied science, engineering, biology, physics, medical and technology and the rest in social and human sciences. This report seems to give the impression that we have produced 14,000 research or innovation equivalent to 14,000 PhDs. What happened to the 40% who came from social and human science? How many of the theses out of the 14,000 were published in reputable journals? Taxpayers money is being used to run these universities. At the end of the day, quality research needs to be seen. Otherwise, a PhD is merely a title to gratify ones ego. DOCTORAL STUDY IS JOURNEY TO GET DOCTORAL DEGRE THE END OF RESEARCH STUDY
1) To map the field or fields relevant to the inquiry. This is likely to involve both showing something of the historical development of the field(s),discussing its empirical and theoretical bases and biases, as well as identifying major debates, key figures and seminal texts. (2) To establish which studies, ideas and/or methods are most pertinent to the specific research being undertaken. No project starts from scratch new research both uses and builds on existing findings. These pre-made building blocks are acknowledged through scrupulous citation practices. (3) To create the warrant for the research. This may involve identifying gaps, bringing together ideas and approaches which have previously remained separate and/or speaking to a particular difficulty, puzzle or debate within the field. Through these three processes, researchers are equipped to not only argue why their research is needed and important, but they also are able: (4) To identify the particular contribution that their research will make. Work with literatures allows researchers to name the conversation(s) which they will enter into and to articulate the chunk of knowledge they are offering to the scholarly community.
(
PROCESS
RESEARCH
PROPOSAL SUBMIT THE FINAL RESEARCH DEFEND IMPORTAT ISSUE OF DOCTORAL RESEARCH IS CONTRIBUTION NOT
what makes your manuscript publishable It's missing element in the existing research literature It's the gap that you fill with your research approach
Phenomena:
Mixed previous empirical results (positive/negative; significant/insignificant) Conflicts in theoretical approach Conflict in empirical methods Arbitrage between literatures Complex ( Rausser and Small, 2000: limited previous results, conflicts, arbitrage)
Literature Reference in Field 1 This summarises what this group of scholars have done BUT Focus on a small number of seminal or influential works from literature.
Analysis of current literature These scholars did brilliant work; HOWEVER, none of these works have addressed our ISSUE/PROBLEM.
However, these scholars have not addressed the issue of XXXX The questions that arise from this situation are, as follows: 1. 2. 3.
Consequently, the purpose of this research is to fill this gap in literature by examining/investigating/developing
Research Questions
1. 2. 3.