Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Payback Period
How long will it take for the project to generate enough cash to pay for itself?
Payback Period
How long will it take for the project to generate enough cash to pay for itself?
(500) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Payback Period
How long will it take for the project to generate enough cash to pay for itself?
(500) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Payback Period
Is a 3.33 year payback period good? Is it acceptable? Firms that use this method will compare the payback calculation to some standard set by the firm. If our senior management had set a cutoff of 5 years for projects like ours, what would be our decision? Accept the project.
This project is clearly unprofitable, but we would accept it based on a 4year payback criterion!
Discounted Payback
Discounts the cash flows at the firms required rate of return. Payback period is calculated using these discounted net cash flows. Problems: Cutoffs are still subjective. Still does not examine all cash flows.
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30 280.70 1 year
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30 280.70 192.37 1 year
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30 280.70 192.37 88.33 1 year 2 years
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30 280.70 192.37 88.33 168.74 1 year 2 years
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
CF (14%)
-500.00 219.30 280.70 192.37 88.33 168.74 1 year 2 years .52 years
Discounted Payback
(500) 0 250 1 250 2 250 3 250 250 4 5
Discounted
Other Methods
1) Net Present Value (NPV) 2) Profitability Index (PI) 3) Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Each of these decision-making criteria: Examines all net cash flows, Considers the time value of money, and Considers the required rate of return.
NPV =
S
t=1
FCFt (1 + k) t
- IO
NPV Example
Suppose we are considering a capital investment that costs Rs.250,000 and provides annual net cash flows of Rs.100,000 for five years. The firms required rate of return is 15%.
NPV Example
Suppose we are considering a capital investment that costs Rs.250,000 and provides annual net cash flows of Rs.100,000 for five years. The firms required rate of return is 15%.
(250,000) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
I = 15
ENTER
ENTER ENTER
ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER CPT You should get NPV = 85,215.51
Profitability Index
Profitability Index
NPV =
S
t=1
FCFt t (1 + k)
- IO
Profitability Index
NPV =
S
t=1
FCFt t (1 + k)
- IO
PI =
S
t=1
FCFt t (1 + k)
IO
Profitability Index
NPV =
S
t=1
FCFt (1 + k) t
- IO
NPV =
S
t=1
n
FCFt (1 + k) t
- IO
IRR:
S
t=1
FCFt t (1 + IRR)
= IO
IRR:
S
t=1
FCFt t (1 + IRR)
= IO
IRR is the rate of return that makes the PV of the cash flows equal to the initial outlay. This looks very similar to our Yield to Maturity formula for bonds. In fact, YTM is the IRR of a bond.
Calculating IRR
Looking again at our problem: The IRR is the discount rate that makes the PV of the projected cash flows equal to the initial outlay.
(250,000) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
IRR
Decision Rule:
If IRR is greater than or equal to the required rate of return, accept. If IRR is less than the required rate of return, reject.
IRR is a good decision-making tool as long as cash flows are conventional. (- + + + + +) Problem: If there are multiple sign changes in the cash flow stream, we could get multiple IRRs. (- + + - + +)
IRR is a good decision-making tool as long as cash flows are conventional. (- + + + + +) Problem: If there are multiple sign changes in the cash flow stream, we could get multiple IRRs. (- + + - + +)
(500)
0
200
1
100
2
(200)
3
400
4
300
5
IRR is a good decision-making tool as long as cash flows are conventional. (- + + + + +) Problem: If there are multiple sign changes in the cash flow stream, we could get multiple IRRs. (- + + - + +)
1
(500)
0
200
1
100
2
(200)
3
400
4
300
5
IRR is a good decision-making tool as long as cash flows are conventional. (- + + + + +) Problem: If there are multiple sign changes in the cash flow stream, we could get multiple IRRs. (- + + - + +)
1 2
(500)
0
200
1
100
2
(200)
3
400
4
300
5
IRR is a good decision-making tool as long as cash flows are conventional. (- + + + + +) Problem: If there are multiple sign changes in the cash flow stream, we could get multiple IRRs. (- + + - + +)
1 2 3
(500)
0
200
1
100
2
(200)
3
400
4
300
5
Summary Problem
Enter the cash flows only once. Find the IRR. Using a discount rate of 15%, find NPV. Add back IO and divide by IO to get PI.
(900)
0
300
1
400
2
400
3
500
4
600
5
Summary Problem
IRR = 34.37%. Using a discount rate of 15%, NPV = Rs.510.52. PI = 1.57. (900)
0
300
1
400
2
400
3
500
4
600
5
MIRR Steps:
Calculate the PV of the cash outflows.
Using the required rate of return.
Calculate the FV of the cash inflows at the last year of the projects time line. This is called the terminal value (TV).
Using the required rate of return.
MIRR: the discount rate that equates the PV of the cash outflows with the PV of the terminal value, ie, that makes: PVoutflows = PVinflows
MIRR
Using our time line and a 15% rate: PV outflows = (900) FV inflows (at the end of year 5) = 2,837. MIRR: FV = 2837, PV = (900), N = 5 solve: I = 25.81%.
(900)
300
400
400
500
600
MIRR
Using our time line and a 15% rate: PV outflows = (900) FV inflows (at the end of year 5) = 2,837. MIRR: FV = 2837, PV = (900), N = 5 solve: I = 25.81%. Conclusion: The projects IRR of 34.37%, assumes that cash flows are reinvested at 34.37%.
MIRR
Using our time line and a 15% rate: PV outflows = (900) FV inflows (at the end of year 5) = 2,837. MIRR: FV = 2837, PV = (900), N = 5 solve: I = 25.81%. Conclusion: The projects IRR of 34.37%, assumes that cash flows are reinvested at 34.37%. Assuming a reinvestment rate of 15%, the projects MIRR is 25.81%.