Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Focus Questions
1. What does artistic autonomy mean? 2. What is the difference between the committed
artist and the autonomous artist and where do we place Dylan in this?
3. How can the artist be seen as a projection of the
audiences ego?
But first...
What do you think the role of the artist is? i.e. what
An opinion...
The work of art,
Sartres attitude
When we unpack his idea, we get this belief that the
intention of art isnt to achieve anything, i.e. it is not a means to an end, it isnt intended to achieve anything.
The reason, as Sartre sees it, is that the work of art,
when it arrives, has already completed its purpose simply by existing. Were not to expect anything else from it because it has already done what it set out to do.
This means the politically committed artist. A committed artist is committed to a cause, they have a message, they see their art as a means to deliver an idea, lesson, etc. to an audience.
Autonomous art has no purpose. It doesnt set out to achieve anything as it is being made. It may have a message, but its not the artists message. Its primary purpose is to exist and be useless.
A Question...
I dont really have an answer to this question: Is Im Not There a committed work or an autonomous work? Do you think it deliberately sets out to teach something/illustrate a message? Or is it more interested in just existing and allowing audiences to do whatever they want?
The idea is that the poster is too busy with its proStalin/pro-communism message to be able to be appreciated as a piece of art. But a Rothko painting on the other hand...
...is entirely useless, in that it is a political void. It is devoid of an immediate message and so its art-ness is able to exist without impediment.
Why do we want?
To paraphrase Jude, why should we care whether he cares? Why are we so interested in the artists attitude towards their fans? Why, when an artist abandons what we knew them for, do we seem to see ourselves as justified in being upset?
Projection
Freud had this belief that we will project false accusations, information, etc. onto an individual for the purpose of maintaining a self-created illusion. The illusion is that weve found someone who understands how we feel about the world and can articulate our thoughts about the world. The idea is that we will falsely accuse the artist of walking away from us, taking away that connection we once had, abandoning their beliefs, all in order to protect that initial illusion. We protect it because the only other alternative is to believe that we were wrong from the beginning and in fact the artist was not my kindred spirit.