Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bruce Buxkemper Optima Systems, Inc. College Station, Texas Consultant to GE Power Management
Agenda
Definition of a high-impedance (HiZ) fault Theory of operation Security and sensitivity analyses Settings Field tests to date
Definition
A high-impedance (HiZ) fault is one that draws too little current to operate conventional overcurrent protection (fuses, relays, etc.).
Feeder Currents
10,000
1,000
A M P S
100
10
HiZ Fault
Load
Bolted Fault
Causes
Contact with tree limb or other object Broken hardware allowing primary to sag Contaminated or failing equipment (insulators, etc.) Broken line on ground
Misconception #1
Misconception: Properly set, overcurrent protection will clear all faults.
Reality: HiZ faults often draw less current than loads, making overcurrent protection impossible.
Misconception #2
Misconception: Sensitive ground protection will clear HiZ faults.
Misconception #3
Misconception: Over time, fault current will increase and operate protection.
Reality: In most cases, fault current decreases as conductor burns, moisture evaporates, sand fuses, etc. O/C protection seldom operates after first minute or so.
Misconception #4
Misconception: Faults always clear on my system.
Reality: Engineering staffs believe HiZ fault rate is low, but line crews report many downed conductors are still hot when they arrive on scene.
Misconception #5
Misconception: TAMU/GE technology will solve all my HiZ problems.
Reality: This technology will detect many faults that overcurrent technology cannot, but no known technology can detect all HiZ faults reliably and securely.
Research History
EPRI targeted problem in late 1970s Constraint: Passive, substation monitoring Texas A&M University looked at nonfundamental frequency current Seven patents GE licensed technology in early 1990s
Detection Requirements
Driven by utility workshops High speed operation not desired Allow conventional protection to operate Distinguish arcing on pole from downed conductor Don't false operate!
Detection Concepts
Monitor multiple parameters simultaneously Use multiple detection techniques Use time to distinguish arcing from transients
Detection Parameters
Odd harmonics (3rd, 5th, )
Largest increase Smallest relative increase
Fault Behavior
Fault Behavior
Randomness algorithm
Monitor parameter continuously Look for sudden increase in variability
Perform coordination Require continued arcing Distinguish downed conductor from arcing
Arcing
In
Randomness 12 Algorithm
12
Overcurrent High Rate of Change Loss of Load Three-phase Event Coordination Timeout Even Harmonic Level Voltage
Downed Conductor
Sensitivity Tests
Texas A&M University's facility
12.47/7.2 kV multi-grounded wye, overhead 2000+ amps available fault current 30K fuse to coordinate with upstream protection
No Fault Current
Total Detectable Total Detected
(2)
15 11 (73%)
Response Procedure
Factors suggesting tripping
Heavily populated areas (especially schools, etc.) Highly flammable conditions
Response Procedure
Factors suggesting tripping Reasons to delay tripping
Loss of traffic signals, etc. Personal injuries (darkened stairways, etc.) Hospitals Location difficulty when circuit not energized
Response Procedure
Factors suggesting tripping Reasons to delay tripping Need written procedure
IEEE Power System Relay Committee WG D15
(http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/td/dist/documents/highz.pdf)
Levels of Alarms
Downed Conductor
Arcing following O/C or loss of load Most serious
Levels of Alarms
Downed Conductor Arcing Alarm
May indicate tree contact, failing equipment, etc. May indicate downed conductor on lightly loaded lateral
Levels of Alarms
Downed Conductor Arcing Alarm Arcing Suspected Alarm
Possible intermittent tree contact, etc. Least serious