Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To keep things simple, we are going to rely on a chart of effective federal tax rates produced by the Tax Policy Center. The chart shows the effective tax rate as a percentage of AGI, divided into quintiles, with the values based on a concept known as cash income. (Heres a definition.) Cash income is not quite the same as adjusted gross income, but Roberton Williams of the Tax Policy Center said the AGI numbers in the charts would provide the closest apples-to-apples comparison to Romneys tax return. Using the Tax Policy Center analysis, we will present the data two ways without and with the employer-paid share of payrolltaxes.Theincomefiguresarerounded.ThefirstmethodistheclosestequivalenttoRomneys tax return. Effective Tax Rates (taxes paid on tax return) Bottom 20 percent (0-$17,000):-5.8 percent Second 20 Percent ($17,000-$33,500):1.3percent Middle 20 percent ($33,500-59,500):9.2 percent Fourth 20 Percent ($59,000-$103,500): 12.9 percent Top20Percent($103,500+):20.6 percent Effective Tax Rates (also including payroll tax paid by employer) Bottom 20 percent (0-$17,000):1percent Second 20 Percent ($17,000-$33,500): 7.8 percent Middle 20 percent ($33,500-59,500): 15.5 percent Fourth 20 Percent ($59,000-$103,500): 18.7 percent Top20Percent($103,500+): 24.3 percent First,onecanseethatforalltherhetoricabouthightaxesintheUnitedStates,mostAmericanspayarelativelysmall percentage of their income in taxes. Second, Romney had an effective rate of 13.9 percent in 2010 and 15.4 percent in 2011, which gives him a higher rate than 80 percent of taxpayers in the first method and puts him just about in the middle of all taxpayers in the second method. No matter how you slice it, his tax rate is not significantly lower than the tax rate paid by middle-class Americans. TheObamacampaigncounteredouranalysisbypointingoutthatthetweetusedthephrasemany,not most,and by providing a dictionary definition showing that manymeans a large amount.The campaign also noted that a White House report showed that while the median tax rate for Americans with income between $50,000 and $100,000 is 13 percent, some 3 million face effective tax rates above 21 percent. Under the campaigns logic, this translates into Romney paying a rate much lessthan manyAmericans, though with the same data, one could say that many more pay a lower rate than Romney. It is not our job to determine whether that is a good or bad thing. The U.S. tax system is designed to be progressive, meaning the rich are generally expected to pay higher taxes than the less wealthy. Politically it may not be smart for Romney, with an annual income topping $20 million, to end up with a tax rate so similar to middle-class tax rates. But we are also reminded of Judge Learned Hards observation in 1935: Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase ones taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.
ThePinocchioTest The Obama campaigns tweet relies on a very slippery fact. Romney, by receiving much of his income in capital gains and dividends and giving millions of dollars to charity, is certainly able to keep his effective tax rate relatively low, especially compared to a wealthy person who earns much of his or her income in salary. But, even so, Romney still pays an effective tax rate that is higher than the tax rate paid by most Americans. (About our rating scale) Check out our candidate Pinocchio Tracker Follow The Fact Checker on Twitter and friend us on Facebook . Track each presidential candidate's campaign ads The Washington Post Company