Notes

LECTURE NOTES ON
INTERMEDIATE FLUID MECHANICS

Joseph M. Powers
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-5637
USA
updated
01 April 2012, 12:46pm
2
CC BY-NC-ND. 01 April 2012, J. M. Powers.
Contents
Preface 11
1 Governing equations 13
1.1 Philosophy of rational continuum mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.1.1 Approaches to uid mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.1.2 Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.1.3 Continuum mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.1.4 Rational continuum mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.1.5 Notions from Newtonian continuum mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.2 Some necessary mathematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.2.1 Vectors and Cartesian tensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.2.1.1 Gibbs and Cartesian Index notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.2.1.2 Rotation of axes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1.2.1.3 Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.2.1.4 Tensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.2.1.4.1 Denition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.2.1.4.2 Alternating unit tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.2.1.4.3 Some secondary denitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.2.1.4.3.1 Transpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.2.1.4.3.2 Symmetric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.2.1.4.3.3 Antisymmetric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.2.1.4.3.4 Decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.2.1.4.4 Tensor inner product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1.2.1.4.5 Dual vector of a tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1.2.1.4.6 Tensor product: two tensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1.2.1.4.7 Vector product: vector and tensor . . . . . . . . . . 31
1.2.1.4.7.1 Pre-multiplication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.2.1.4.7.2 Post-multiplication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.2.1.4.8 Dyadic product: two vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.2.1.4.9 Contraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.2.1.4.10 Vector cross product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.2.1.4.11 Vector associated with a plane . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3
4 CONTENTS
1.2.2 Eigenvalues and eigenvectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
1.2.3 Grad, div, curl, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
1.2.3.1 Gradient operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
1.2.3.2 Divergence operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
1.2.3.3 Curl operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1.2.3.4 Laplacian operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1.2.3.5 Relevant theorems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1.2.3.5.1 Fundamental theorem of calculus . . . . . . . . . . 44
1.2.3.5.2 Gausss theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
1.2.3.5.3 Stokes theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
1.2.3.5.4 Kinetic energy divergence identity . . . . . . . . . . 45
1.2.3.5.5 Leibnizs rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
1.2.3.5.6 Reynolds transport theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1.3 Kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1.3.1 Lagrangian description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1.3.2 Eulerian description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1.3.3 Material derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1.3.4 Streamlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
1.3.5 Pathlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
1.3.6 Streaklines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
1.3.7 Kinematic decomposition of motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
1.3.7.1 Translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
1.3.7.2 Solid body rotation and straining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
1.3.7.2.1 Solid body rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
1.3.7.2.2 Straining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
1.3.7.2.2.1 Extensional straining . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
1.3.7.2.2.2 Shear straining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
1.3.7.2.2.3 Principal axes of strain rate . . . . . . . . . 58
1.3.8 Expansion rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
1.3.9 Invariants of the strain rate tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
1.3.10 Invariants of the velocity gradient tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
1.3.11 Two-dimensional kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
1.3.11.1 General two-dimensional ows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
1.3.11.1.1 Rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
1.3.11.1.2 Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1.3.11.1.3 Shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1.3.11.1.4 Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1.3.11.2 Relative motion along 1 axis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1.3.11.3 Relative motion along 2 axis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
1.3.11.4 Uniform ow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
1.3.11.5 Pure rigid body rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
1.3.11.6 Pure extensional motion (a compressible ow) . . . . . . . . 67
CONTENTS 5
1.3.11.7 Pure shear straining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
1.3.11.8 Couette ow: shear + rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
1.3.11.9 Ideal point vortex: extension+shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
1.3.12 Kinematics as a dynamical system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
1.4 Conservation axioms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
1.4.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
1.4.2 Linear momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
1.4.2.1 Statement of the principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
1.4.2.2 Surface forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
1.4.2.3 Final form of linear momenta equation . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
1.4.3 Angular momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
1.4.4 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
1.4.4.1 Total energy term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
1.4.4.2 Work term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
1.4.4.3 Heat transfer term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
1.4.4.4 Conservative form of the energy equation . . . . . . . . . . 91
1.4.4.5 Secondary forms of the energy equation . . . . . . . . . . . 92
1.4.4.5.1 Mechanical energy equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
1.4.4.5.2 Thermal energy equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
1.4.4.5.3 Non-conservative energy equation . . . . . . . . . . 93
1.4.4.5.4 Energy equation in terms of enthalpy . . . . . . . . 94
1.4.4.5.5 Energy equation in terms of entropy . . . . . . . . 95
1.4.5 Entropy inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
1.4.6 Summary of axioms in dierential form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
1.4.6.1 Conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
1.4.6.1.1 Cartesian index form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
1.4.6.1.2 Gibbs form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
1.4.6.1.3 Non-orthogonal index form . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
1.4.6.2 Non-conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
1.4.6.2.2 Gibbs form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
1.4.6.2.3 Non-orthogonal index form . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
1.4.6.3 Physical interpretations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
1.4.7 Complete system of equations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
1.4.8 Integral forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
1.4.8.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
1.4.8.1.1 Fixed region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
1.4.8.1.2 Material region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
1.4.8.1.3 Moving solid enclosure with holes . . . . . . . . . . 104
1.4.8.2 Linear momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
1.4.8.3 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
1.4.8.4 General expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6 CONTENTS
1.5 Constitutive equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
1.5.1 Frame and material indierence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
1.5.2 Second law restrictions and Onsager relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
1.5.2.1 Weak form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality . . . . . . . . 108
1.5.2.1.1 Non-physical motivating example . . . . . . . . . . 108
1.5.2.1.2 Real physical eects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
1.5.2.2 Strong form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality . . . . . . . . 111
1.5.3 Fouriers law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
1.5.4 Stress-strain rate relation for a Newtonian uid . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1.5.4.1 Underlying experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
1.5.4.2 Analysis for isotropic Newtonian uid . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
1.5.4.2.1 Diagonal component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
1.5.4.2.2 O-diagonal component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
1.5.4.3 Stokes assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
1.5.4.4 Second law restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
1.5.4.4.1 One dimensional systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
1.5.4.4.2 Two dimensional systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
1.5.4.4.3 Three dimensional systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
1.5.5 Equations of state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
1.6 Boundary and interface conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
1.7 Complete set of compressible Navier-Stokes equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
1.7.0.1 Conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
1.7.0.1.2 Gibbs form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
1.7.0.2 Non-conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
1.7.0.2.2 Gibbs form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
1.8 Incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with constant properties . . . . . . . 140
1.8.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
1.8.2 Linear momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
1.8.3 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
1.8.4 Summary of incompressible constant property equations . . . . . . . 142
1.8.5 Limits for one-dimensional diusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
1.9 Dimensionless compressible Navier-Stokes equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
1.9.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
1.9.2 Linear momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
1.9.3 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
1.9.4 Thermal state equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1.9.5 Caloric state equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1.9.6 Upstream conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1.9.7 Reduction in parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
1.10 First integrals of linear momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
CONTENTS 7
1.10.1 Bernoullis equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
1.10.1.1 Irrotational case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
1.10.1.2 Steady case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
1.10.1.2.1 Streamline integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
1.10.1.2.2 Lamb surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
1.10.1.3 Irrotational, steady, incompressible case . . . . . . . . . . . 153
1.10.2 Croccos theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
1.10.2.1 Stagnation enthalpy variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
1.10.2.2 Extended Croccos theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
1.10.2.3 Traditional Croccos theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
2 Vortex dynamics 159
2.1 Transformations to cylindrical coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
2.1.1 Centripetal and Coriolis acceleration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
2.1.2 Grad and div for cylindrical systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
2.1.2.1 Grad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
2.1.2.2 Div . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
2.1.3 Incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates . . 166
2.2 Ideal rotational vortex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
2.3 Ideal irrotational vortex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
2.4 Helmholtz vorticity transport equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
2.4.1 General development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
2.4.2 Incompressible conservative body force limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
2.4.2.1 Isotropic, Newtonian, constant viscosity . . . . . . . . . . . 174
2.4.2.2 Two-dimensional, isotropic, Newtonian, constant viscosity . 175
2.4.3 Physical interpretations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
2.4.3.1 Baroclinic (non-barotropic) eects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
2.4.3.2 Bending and stretching of vortex tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
2.5 Kelvins circulation theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
2.6 Potential ow of ideal point vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
2.6.1 Two interacting ideal vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
2.6.2 Image vortex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
2.6.3 Vortex sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
2.6.4 Potential of an ideal vortex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
2.6.5 Interaction of multiple vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
2.6.6 Pressure eld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
2.6.6.1 Single stationary vortex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
2.6.6.2 Group of N vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
2.7 Inuence of walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
2.7.1 Streamlines and vortex lines at walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
2.7.2 Generation of vorticity at walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
8 CONTENTS
3 One-dimensional compressible ow 193
3.1 Generalized one-dimensional equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
3.1.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
3.1.2 Linear momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
3.1.3 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
3.1.4 Summary of equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
3.1.4.1 Unsteady conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
3.1.4.2 Unsteady non-conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
3.1.4.3 Steady conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
3.1.4.4 Steady non-conservative form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
3.1.5 Inuence coecients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
3.2 Flow with area change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
3.2.1 Isentropic Mach number relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
3.2.2 Sonic properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
3.2.3 Eect of area change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
3.2.4 Choking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
3.3 Normal shock waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
3.3.1 Rankine-Hugoniot equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
3.3.2 Rayleigh line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
3.3.3 Hugoniot curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
3.3.4 Solution procedure for general equations of state . . . . . . . . . . . 218
3.3.5 Calorically perfect ideal gas solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
3.3.6 Acoustic limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
3.4 Flow with area change and normal shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
3.4.1 Converging nozzle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
3.4.2 Converging-diverging nozzle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
3.5 Rarefactions and the method of characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
3.5.1 Inviscid one-dimensional equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
3.5.2 Homeoentropic ow of an ideal gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
3.5.3 Simple waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
3.5.4 Prandtl-Meyer rarefaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
3.5.5 Simple compression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
3.5.6 Two interacting expansions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
3.5.7 Wall interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
3.5.8 Shock tube . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
3.5.9 Final note on method of characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
4 Potential ow 249
4.1 Stream functions and velocity potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
4.2 Mathematics of complex variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
4.2.1 Eulers formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
4.2.2 Polar and Cartesian representations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
CONTENTS 9
4.2.3 Cauchy-Riemann equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
4.3 Elementary complex potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
4.3.1 Uniform ow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
4.3.2 Sources and sinks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
4.3.3 Point vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258
4.3.4 Superposition of sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
4.3.5 Flow in corners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
4.3.6 Doublets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
4.3.7 Rankine half body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
4.3.8 Flow over a cylinder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
4.4 More complex variable theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
4.4.1 Contour integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
4.4.1.1 Simple pole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
4.4.1.2 Constant potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
4.4.1.3 Uniform ow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
4.4.1.4 Quadrapole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
4.4.2 Laurent series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
4.5 Pressure distribution for steady ow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
4.6 Blasius force theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
4.7 Kutta-Zhukovsky lift theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
4.8 Conformal mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
5 Viscous incompressible laminar ow 281
5.1 Fully developed, one dimensional solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
5.1.1 Pressure gradient driven ow in a slot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
5.1.2 Couette ow with pressure gradient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
5.2 Similarity solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
5.2.1 Stokes rst problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
5.2.2 Blasius boundary layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
Bibliography 327
10 CONTENTS
Preface
These are lecture notes for AME 60635, Intermediate Fluid Mechanics, taught at the Depart-
ment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of the University of Notre Dame. Most of
the students in this course are beginning graduate students and advanced undergraduates in
engineering. The objective of the course is to provide a survey of a wide variety of topics in
uid mechanics, including a rigorous derivation of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations,
vorticity dynamics, compressible ow, potential ow, and viscous laminar ow.
While there is a good deal of rigor in the development here, it is not absolute. It is
not hard to nd gaps in some of the developments; consequently, the student should call on
textbooks and other reference materials for a full description. A great deal of the develop-
ment and notation for the governing equations closely follows Panton
1
, who I nd gives an
especially clear presentation. The material in the remaining chapters is drawn from a wide
variety of sources. A full list is given in the bibliography, though specic citations are not
given in the text. The notes, along with much information on the course itself, can be found
on the world wide web at http://www.nd.edu/powers/ame.60635. At this stage, anyone
is free to duplicate the notes.
The notes have been transposed from written notes I developed in teaching this and a
related course in the years 1991-94. Many enhancements have been added, and thanks go
to many students and faculty who have pointed out errors. It is likely that there are more
waiting to be discovered; I would be happy to hear from you regarding these or suggestions
for improvement.
Joseph M. Powers
powers@nd.edu
http://www.nd.edu/powers
Notre Dame, Indiana; USA
CC
BY:
$
\
=
01 April 2012
The content of this book is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0.
1
R. L. Panton, Incompressible Flow, third edition, John Wiley, New York, 2005.
11
12 CONTENTS
Chapter 1
Governing equations
see Panton, Chapters 1-6,
see Yih, Chapters 1-3, Appendix 1-2,
see Aris.
1.1 Philosophy of rational continuum mechanics
1.1.1 Approaches to uid mechanics
We seek here to present an approach to uid mechanics founded on the principles of rational
continuum mechanics. There are many paths to understanding uid mechanics, and good
arguments can be made for each. A typical rst undergraduate class will combine a mix of
basic equations, coupled with strong physical motivations, and allows the student to develop
a knowledge which is of great practical value and driven strongly by intuition. Such an
approach works well within the connes of the intuition we develop in everyday life. It often
fails when the engineer moves in to unfamiliar territory. For example, lack of fundamental
understanding of high Mach number ows led to many aircraft and rocket failures in the
1950s. In such cases, a return to the formalism of a careful theory, one which clearly exposes
the strengths and weaknesses of all assumptions, is invaluable in both understanding the true
uid physics, and applying that knowledge to engineering design.
Probably the most formal of approaches is that of the school of thought advocated most
clearly by Truesdell,
1
sometimes known as Rational Continuum Mechanics. Truesdell de-
veloped a broadly based theory which encompassed all materials which could be regarded
as continua, including solids, liquids, and gases, in the limit when averaging volumes were
suciently large so that the micro- and nanoscopic structure of these materials was unimpor-
tant. For uids (both liquid and gas), such length scales are often on the order of microns,
while for solids, it may be somewhat smaller, depending on the type of crystalline structure.
The diculty of the Truesdellian approach is that it is burdened with a dicult notation
1
Cliord Ambrose Truesdell, III, 1919-2000, American continuum mechanician and natural philosopher.
Taught at Indiana and Johns Hopkins Universities.
13
14 CHAPTER 1. GOVERNING EQUATIONS
and tends to become embroiled in proofs and philosophy, which while ultimately useful, can
preclude learning basic uid mechanics in the time scale of the human lifetime.
In this course, we will attempt to steer a course between the pragmatism of undergrad-
uate uid mechanics and the harsh formalism of the Truesdellian school. The material will
pay homage to rational continuum mechanics and will be geared towards a basic under-
standing of uid behavior. We shall rst spend some time carefully developing the governing
equations for a compressible viscous uid. We shall then study representative solutions of
these equations in a wide variety of physically motivated limits in order to understand how
the basic conservation principles of mass, momenta, and energy, coupled with constitutive
relations inuence the behavior of uids.
1.1.2 Mechanics
Mechanics is the broad superset of the topic matter of this course. Mechanics is the science
which seeks an explanation for the motion of bodies based upon models grounded in well
dened axioms. Axioms, as in geometry, are statements which cannot be proved; they are
useful insofar as they give rise to results which are consistent with our empirical observations.
A hallmark of science has been the struggle to identify the smallest set of axioms which are
sucient to describe our universe. When we nd an axiom to be inconsistent with observa-
tion, it must be modied or eliminated. A familiar example of this is the Michelson-
2
Morley
3
experiment, which motivated Einstein
4
to modify the Newtonian
5
axioms of conservation of
mass and energy into a conservation of mass-energy.
In Truesdells exposition on mechanics, he suggests the following hierarchy:
bodies exist,
bodies are assigned to place,
geometry is the theory of place,
change of place in time is the motion of the body,
a description of the motion of a body is kinematics,
2
Albert Abraham Michelson, 1852-1931, Prussian born American physicist, graduate of the U.S. Naval
Academy and faculty member at Case School of Applied Science, Clark University, and University of Chicago.
3
Edward Williams Morley, 1838-1923, New Jersey-born American physical chemist, graduate of Williams
College, professor of chemistry at Western Reserve College.
4
Albert Einstein, 1879-1955, German physicist who developed the theory of relativity and made funda-
mental contributions to quantum mechanics and Brownian motion in uid mechanics; spent later life in the
United States.
5
Sir Isaac Newton, 1642-1727, English physicist and mathematician and chief gure of the scientic rev-
olution of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Developed calculus, theories of gravitation and motion
of bodies, and optics. Educated at Cambridge University and holder of the Lucasian chair at Cambridge. In
civil service as Warden of the Mint, he became the terror of counterfeiters, sending many to the gallows.
1.1. PHILOSOPHY OF RATIONAL CONTINUUM MECHANICS 15
motion is the consequence of forces,
study of forces on a body is dynamics.
There are many subsets of mechanics, e.g. statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics,
continuum mechanics, uid mechanics, solid mechanics. Auto mechanics, while a legitimate
topic for study, does not generally fall into the class of mechanics we consider here, though
the intersection of the two sets is not the empty set.
1.1.3 Continuum mechanics
Early mechanicians, such as Newton, dealt primarily with point mass and nite collections
of particles. In one sense this is because such systems are the easiest to study, and it makes
more sense to grasp the simple before the complex. External motivation was also present
in the 18th century, which had a martial need to understand the motion of cannonballs
and a theological need to understand the motion of planets. The discipline which considers
systems of this type is often referred to as classical mechanics. Mathematically, such systems
are generally characterized by a nite number of ordinary dierential equations, and the
properties of each particle (e.g. position, velocity) are taken to be functions of time only.
Continuum mechanics, generally attributed to Euler,
6
considers instead an innite num-
ber of particles. In continuum mechanics every physical property (e.g. velocity, density,
pressure) is taken to be functions of both time and space. There is an innitesimal property
variation from point to point in space. While variations are generally continuous, nite num-
bers of surfaces of discontinuous property variation are allowed. This models, for example,
the contact between one continuous body and another. Point discontinuities are not allowed,
however. Finite valued material properties are required. Mathematically, such systems are
characterized by a nite number of partial dierential equations in which the properties of
the continuum material are functions of both space and time. It is possible to show that
a partial dierential equation can be thought of as an innite number of ordinary dieren-
tial equations, so this is consistent with our model of a continuum as an innite number of
particles.
1.1.4 Rational continuum mechanics
The modier rational was rst applied by Truesdell to continuum mechanics to distin-
guish the formal approach advocated by his school, from less formal, though mainly not
irrational, approaches to continuum mechanics. Rational continuum mechanics is developed
in a manner similar to that which Euclid
7
used for his geometry: formal denitions, axioms,
and theorems, all accompanied by careful language and proofs. This course will generally
6
Leonhard Euler, 1707-1783, Swiss-born mathematician and physicist who served in the court of Cather-
ine I of Russia in St. Petersburg, regarded by many as one of the greatest mechanicians.
7
Euclid, Greek geometer of profound inuence who taught in Alexandria, Egypt, during the reign of
Ptolemy I Soter, who ruled 323-283 BC.
follow the less formal, albeit still rigorous, approach of Pantons text, including the adoption
of much of Pantons notation.
1.1.5 Notions from Newtonian continuum mechanics
The following are useful notions from Newtonian continuum mechanics. Here we use New-
tonian to distinguish our mechanics from Einsteinian or relativistic mechanics.
Space is three-dimensional and independent of time.
An inertial frame is a reference frame in which the laws of physics are invariant.
A Galilean transformation species how to transform from an inertial frame to a frame
of reference moving at constant velocity. If the inertial frame has zero velocity and the
moving frame has constant velocity v
o
= u
o
i +v
o
j +w
o
k, the Galilean transformation
(x, y, z, t) (x
, y
, z
, t
) is as follows
x
= x u
o
t, (1.1)
y
= y v
o
t, (1.2)
z
= z w
o
t, (1.3)
t
= t. (1.4)
Control volumes are useful; we will study three varieties:
Fixed: constant in space,
Material: no ux of mass through boundaries, can deform,
Arbitrary: can move, can deform, can have dierent uid contained within.
Control surfaces enclose control volumes; they have the same three varieties:
Fixed,
Material,
Arbitrary.
Density is a material property, not used in classical mechanics, which only considers
point masses. We can dene density as
= lim
V 0
N
i=1
m
i
V
. (1.5)
Here V is the volume of the space considered, N is the number of particles contained
within the volume, and m
i
is the mass of the ith particle. We can dene a length scale
L associated with the volume V to be L = V
1/3
. In commonly encountered physical
scenarios, we expect the density to vary with distance on a macroscale, approach a
limiting value at the microscale, and become ill-dened below a cuto scale below
which molecular eects are important. That is to say, when V becomes too small, such
that only a few molecules are contained within it, we expect wild oscillations in .
We will in fact assume that matter can be modeled as a continuum: the limit in which
discrete changes from molecule to molecule can be ignored and distances and times
over which we are concerned are much larger than those of the molecular scale. This
will enable the use of calculus in our continuum thermodynamics.
Continuum mechanics will treat macroscopic eects only and ignore individual molec-
ular eects. For example molecules bouncing o a wall exchange momentum with the
wall and induce pressure. We could use Newtonian mechanics for each particle collision
to calculate the net force on the wall. Instead our approach amounts to considering
the average over space and time of the net eect of millions of collisions on a wall.
The continuum theory can break down in important applications where the length
and time scales are of comparable magnitude to molecular time scales. Important
applications where the continuum assumption breaks down include
rareed gas dynamics of the outer atmosphere (relevant for low orbit space vehi-
cles), and
nano-scale heat transfer (relevant in cooling of computer chips).
To get some idea of the scales involved, we note that for air at atmospheric pressure
and temperature that the time and distance between molecular collisions provide the
limits of the continuum. Under these conditions, we nd for air
length > 0.1 m, and
time > 0.1 ns,
will be sucient to admit the continuum assumption. For denser gases, these cuto
scales are smaller. For lighter gases, these cuto scales are larger. A sketch of a possible
density variation in a gas near atmospheric pressure is given in Fig. 1.1.
Details of collision theory can be found in advanced texts such as that of Vincenti and
Kruger.
8
They show for air that the mean free path is well modeled by the equation:
=
M
2Nd
2
. (1.6)
Here M is the molecular mass, N is Avogadros number, and d is the molecular diam-
eter.
8
W. G. Vincenti and C. H. Kruger, 1965, Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics, John Wiley, New York,
pp. 12-26.
10
-8
10
-6
10
-4
0.01 1
x (m)
0.01
1
100
(kg/m
3
)
variation on the
continuum scale
variation on the
sub-continuum
molecular scale
Figure 1.1: Sketch of possible density variation of a gas near atmospheric pressure.
Example 1.1
Find the variation of mean free path with density for air.
We turn to Vincenti and Kruger for numerical parameter values, which are seen to be M =
28.9 kg/kmole, N = 6.02252 10
23
molecule/mole, d = 3.7 10
10
m. Thus,
=
_
28.9
kg
kmole
_
_
1 kmole
1000 mole
_
2
_
6.02252 10
23
molecule
mole
_
(3.7 10
10
m)
2
, (1.7)
=
7.8895 10
8 kg
molecule m
2
. (1.8)
Note that the unit molecule is not really a dimension, but really is literally a unit, which may
well be thought of as dimensionless. Thus, we can safely say
=
7.8895 10
8 kg
m
2
. (1.9)
A plot of the variation of mean free path as a function of is given in Fig. 1.2. Vincenti and
Kruger go on to consider an atmosphere with density of = 1.288 kg/m
3
. For this density
=
7.8895 10
8 kg
m
2
1.288
kg
m
3
, (1.10)
= 6.125 10
8
m, (1.11)
= 6.125 10
2
m. (1.12)
Vincenti and Kruger also show the mean molecular speed under these conditions is roughly
c = 500 m/s, so the mean time between collisions, , is

c
=
6.125 10
8
m
500
m
s
= 1.225 10
10
s. (1.13)
0.01 0.1 1 10
10
-7
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-8
0.001
(m)
(kg/m
3
)
atm
1.288 kg/m
3
atm
~ 6.125 x 10
-8
m
Figure 1.2: Mean free path length, , as a function of density, , for air.
Density is an example of a scalar property. We shall have more to say later about
scalars. For now we say that a scalar property associates a single number with each
point in time and space. We can think of this by writing the usual notation (x, y, z, t),
which indicates has functional variation with position and time.
Other properties are not scalar, but are vector properties. For example the velocity
vector
v(x, y, z, t) = u(x, y, z, t)i + v(x, y, z, t)j + w(x, y, z, t)k, (1.14)
associates three scalars u, v, w with each point in space and time. We will see that a
vector can be characterized as a scalar associated with a particular direction in space.
Here we use a boldfaced notation for a vector. This is known as Gibbs
9
notation. We
will soon study an alternate notation, developed by Einstein, and known as Cartesian
10
index notation.
Other properties are not scalar or vector, but are what is know as tensorial. The
relevant properties are called tensors. The best known example is the stress tensor.
One can think of a tensor as a quantity which associates a vector with a plane inclined at
a selected angle passing through a given point in space. An example is the viscous stress
9
Josiah Willard Gibbs, 1839-1903, American physicist and chemist with a lifelong association with Yale
University who made fundamental contributions to vector analysis, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics,
and chemistry. Studied in Europe in the 1860s. Probably one of the few great American scientists of the
nineteenth century.
10
Rene Descartes, 1596-1650, French mathematician and philosopher of great inuence. A great doubter
of existence who nevertheless concluded, I think, therefore I am. Developed analytic geometry.
tensor , which is best expressed as a three by three matrix with nine components:
(x, y, z, t) =
_
_
xx
(x, y, z, t)
xy
(x, y, z, t)
xz
(x, y, z, t)
yx
(x, y, z, t)
yy
(x, y, z, t)
yz
(x, y, z, t)
zx
(x, y, z, t)
zy
(x, y, z, t)
zz
(x, y, z, t)
_
_
(1.15)
1.2 Some necessary mathematics
Here we outline some fundamental mathematical principles which are necessary to under-
stand continuum mechanics as it will be presented here.
1.2.1 Vectors and Cartesian tensors
1.2.1.1 Gibbs and Cartesian Index notation
Gibbs notation for vectors and tensors is the most familiar from undergraduate courses.
It typically uses boldface, arrows, underscores, or overbars to denote a vector or a tensor.
Unfortunately, it also hides some of the structures which are actually present in the equations.
Einstein realized this in developing the theory of general relativity and developed a useful
alternate, index notation. In these notes we will focus on what is known as Cartesian
index notation, which is restricted to Cartesian coordinate systems. Einstein also developed
a more general index system for non-Cartesian systems. We will briey touch on this in
our summaries of our equations later in this chapter but refer the reader to books such as
those by Aris for a full exposition. While it can seem dicult at the outset, in the end
many agree that the use of index notation actually simplies many common notions in uid
mechanics. Moreover, its use in the archival literature is widespread, so to be conversant
in uid mechanics, one must know index notation. The following table summarizes the
correspondences between Gibbs, Cartesian index, and matrix notation.
Quantity Common Gibbs Cartesian Matrix
Parlance Index
zeroth order tensor scalar a a ( a )
rst order tensor vector a a
i
_
_
_
_
a
1
a
2
.
.
.
a
n
_
_
_
_
second order tensor tensor A a
ij
_
_
_
_
a
11
a
12
. . . a
1n
a
21
a
22
. . . a
2n
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
a
n1
a
n2
. . . a
nn
_
_
_
_
third order tensor tensor A a
ijk
-
fourth order tensor tensor A a
ijkl
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. -
1.2. SOME NECESSARY MATHEMATICS 21
Here we adopt a convention for the Gibbs notation, which we will nd at times conicts
with other conventions, in which italics font (a) indicates a scalar, bold font (a) indicates a
vector, upper case sans serif (A) indicates a second order tensor, over-lined upper case sans
seri (A) indicates a third order tensor, double over-lined upper case sans serif (A) indicates
a fourth order tensor. In Cartesian index notation, their is no need to use anything except
italics, as all terms are thought of as scalar components of a more expansive structure, with
the structure indicated by the presence of subscripts.
The essence of the Cartesian index notation is as follows. We can represent a three
dimensional vector a as a linear combination of scalars and orthonormal basis vectors:
a = a
x
i + a
y
j + a
z
k. (1.16)
We choose now to associate the subscript 1 with the x direction, the subscript 2 with the
y direction, and the subscript 3 with the z direction. Further, we replace the orthonormal
basis vectors i, j, and k, by e
1
, e
2
, and e
3
. Then the vector a is represented by
a = a
1
e
1
+ a
2
e
2
+ a
3
e
3
=
3
i=1
a
i
e
i
= a
i
e
i
= a
i
=
_
_
a
1
a
2
a
3
_
_
. (1.17)
Following Einstein, we have adopted the convention that a summation is understood to exist
when two indices, known as dummy indices, are repeated, and have further left the explicit
representation of basis vectors out of our nal version of the notation. We have also included
a representation of a as a 3 1 column vector. We adopt the standard that all vectors can
be thought of as column vectors. Often in matrix operations, we will need row vectors.
They will be formed by taking the transpose, indicated by a superscript T, of a column
vector. In the interest of clarity, full consistency with notions from matrix algebra, as well
as transparent translation to the conventions of necessarily meticulous (as well as popular)
software tools such as Matlab, we will scrupulously use the transpose notation. This comes
at the expense of a more cluttered set of equations at times. We also note that most authors
do not explicitly use the transpose notation, but its use is implicit.
1.2.1.2 Rotation of axes
The Cartesian index notation is developed to be valid under transformations from one Carte-
sian coordinate system to another Cartesian coordinate system. It is not applicable to either
general orthogonal systems (such as cylindrical or spherical) or non-orthogonal systems. It
is straightforward, but tedious, to develop a more general system to handle generalized co-
ordinate transformations, and Einstein did just that as well. For our purposes however, the
simpler Cartesian index notation will suce.
We will consider a coordinate transformation which is a simple rotation of axes. This
transformation preserves all angles; hence, right angles in the original Cartesian system will
be right angles in the rotated, but still Cartesian system. We will require, ultimately, that
whatever theory we develop must generate results in which physically relevant quantities such
x* = x* cos + x* cos
1 1 2
x
1
x
1
x
2
x
2
x*
2
x*
1
P
x
*
1
Figure 1.3: Sketch of coordinate transformation which is a rotation of axes
as temperature, pressure, density, and velocity magnitude, are independent of the particular
set of coordinates with which we choose to describe the system. To motivate this, let us
consider a two-dimensional rotation from an unprimed system to a primed system. So,
we seek a transformation which maps (x
1
, x
2
)
T
(x
1
, x
2
)
T
. We will rotate the unprimed
system counterclockwise through an angle to achieve the primed system. The rotation is
sketched in Figure 1.3. Note that it is easy to show that the angle = /2 . Here a
point P is identied by a particular set of coordinates (x
1
, x
2
). One of the keys to all of
continuum mechanics is realizing that while the location (or velocity, or stress, ...) of P may
be represented dierently in various coordinate systems, ultimately it must represent the
same physical reality. Straightforward geometry shows the following relation between the
primed and unprimed coordinate systems for x
1
x
1
= x
1
cos + x
2
cos . (1.18)
More generally, we can say for an arbitrary point that
x
1
= x
1
cos + x
2
cos . (1.19)
We adopt the following notation
(x
1
, x
1
) denotes the angle between the x
1
and x
1
axes,
(x
2
, x
2
2
and x
2
axes,
(x
3
, x
3
3
and x
3
axes,
(x
1
, x
2
1
and x
2
axes,
.
.
.
Thus, in two-dimensions, we have
x
1
= x
1
cos(x
1
, x
1
) + x
2
cos(x
2
, x
1
). (1.20)
In three dimensions, this extends to
x
1
= x
1
cos(x
1
, x
1
) + x
2
cos(x
2
, x
1
) + x
3
cos(x
3
, x
1
). (1.21)
Extending this analysis to calculate x
2
and x
3
gives
x
2
= x
1
cos(x
1
, x
2
) + x
2
cos(x
2
, x
2
) + x
3
cos(x
3
, x
2
), (1.22)
x
3
= x
1
cos(x
1
, x
3
) + x
2
cos(x
2
, x
3
) + x
3
cos(x
3
, x
3
). (1.23)
The above equations can be written in matrix form as
( x
1
x
2
x
3
) = ( x
1
x
2
x
3
)
_
_
cos(x
1
, x
1
) cos(x
1
, x
2
) cos(x
1
, x
3
)
cos(x
2
, x
1
) cos(x
2
, x
2
) cos(x
2
, x
3
)
cos(x
3
, x
1
) cos(x
3
, x
2
) cos(x
3
, x
3
)
_
_
(1.24)
If we use the shorthand notation, for example, that
11
= cos(x
1
, x
1
),
12
= cos(x
1
, x
2
), etc.,
we have
( x
1
x
2
x
3
)
. .
x
T
= ( x
1
x
2
x
3
)
. .
x
T
_
_
11

12

13
21

22

23
31

32

33
_
_
. .
Q
(1.25)
In Gibbs notation, dening the matrix of s to be Q, and recalling that all vectors are taken
to be column vectors, we can alternatively say x
T
= x
T
Q. Taking the transpose of both
sides and recalling the useful identities that (a b)
T
= b
T
a
T
and (a
T
)
T
= a, we can also
say x
= Q
T
x.
11
We call Q =
ij
the matrix of direction cosines and Q
T
=
ji
the rotation
11
The more commonly used alternate convention of not explicitly using the transpose notation for vectors
would instead have our x
T
= x
T
Q written as x
= x Q. In fact, our use of the transpose notation

is strictly viable only for Cartesian coordinate systems, while many will allow Gibbs notation to represent
vectors in non-Cartesian coordinates, for which the transpose operation is ill-suited. However, realizing that
these notes will primarily focus on Cartesian systems, and that such operations relying on the transpose
are useful notions from linear algebra, it will be employed in an overly liberal fashion in these notes. The
alternate convention still typically applies, where necessary, the transpose notation for tensors, so it would
also hold that x
= Q
T
x.
matrix. It can be shown that coordinate systems which satisfy the right hand rule require
further that
det Q = 1. (1.26)
The equation x
T
= x
T
Q is really a set of three linear equations. For instance, the rst
is
x
1
= x
1
11
+ x
2
21
+ x
3
31
. (1.27)
More generally, we could say that
x
j
= x
1
1j
+ x
2
2j
+ x
3
3j
. (1.28)
Here j is a so-called free index, which for three-dimensional space takes on values j = 1, 2, 3.
Some rules of thumb for free indices are
A free index can appear only once in each additive term.
One free index (e.g. k) may replace another (e.g. j) as long as it is replaced in each
additive term.
We can simplify Eq. (1.28) further by writing
x
j
=
3
i=1
x
i
ij
. (1.29)
This is commonly written in the following form:
x
j
= x
i
ij
. (1.30)
We again note that it is to be understood that whenever an index is repeated, as has the
index i above, that a summation from i = 1 to i = 3 is to be performed and that i is the
dummy index. Some rules of thumb for dummy indices are
dummy indices can appear only twice in a given additive term,
a pair of dummy indices, say i, i, can be exchanged for another, say j, j, in a given
additive term with no need to change dummy indices in other additive terms.
We dene the Kronecker delta,
ij
as
ij
=
_
0 i = j,
1 i = j,
(1.31)
This is eectively the identity matrix I:
ij
= I =
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
_
_
. (1.32)
Direct substitution proves that what is eectively the law of cosines can be written as
ij
kj
=
ik
. (1.33)
Example 1.2
Show for the two-dimensional system described in Figure 1.3 that
ij
kj
=
ik
holds.
Expanding for the two-dimensional system, we get
i1
k1
+
i2
k2
=
ik
.
First, take i = 1, k = 1. We get then
11
11
+
12
12
=
11
= 1,
cos cos + cos( + /2) cos( + /2) = 1,
cos cos + (sin())(sin()) = 1,
cos
2
+ sin
2
= 1.
This is obviously true. Next, take i = 1, k = 2. We get then
11
21
+
12
22
=
12
= 0,
cos cos(/2 ) + cos( + /2) cos() = 0,
cos sin sin cos = 0.
21
11
+
22
12
=
21
= 0,
cos(/2 ) cos + cos cos(/2 + ) = 0,
sin cos + cos (sin ) = 0.
21
21
+
22
22
=
22
= 1,
cos(/2 ) cos(/2 ) + cos cos = 1,
sin sin + cos cos = 1.
Again, this is obviously true.
Using this, we can easily nd the inverse transformation back to the unprimed coordinates
via the following operations:
kj
x
j
=
kj
x
i
ij
, (1.34)
=
ij
kj
x
i
, (1.35)
=
ik
x
i
, (1.36)
kj
x
j
= x
k
, (1.37)
ij
x
j
= x
i
, (1.38)
x
i
=
ij
x
j
. (1.39)
The Kronecker delta is also known as the substitution tensor as it has the property that
application of it to a vector simply substitutes one index for another:
x
k
=
ki
x
i
. (1.40)
For students familiar with linear algebra, it is easy to show that the matrix of direction
cosines,
ij
, is an orthogonal matrix; that is, each of its columns is a vector which is orthogonal
to the other column vectors. Additionally, each column vector is itself normal. Such a
vector has a Euclidean norm of unity, and three eigenvalues which have magnitude of unity.
Operation of such matrix on a vector rotates it, but does not stretch it.
1.2.1.3 Vectors
Three scalar quantities v
i
where i = 1, 2, 3 are scalar components of a vector if they transform
according to the following rule
v
j
= v
i
ij
(1.41)
under a rotation of axes characterized by direction cosines
ij
. In Gibbs notation, we would
say v
T
= v
T
Q, or alternatively v
= Q
T
v.
We can also say that a vector associates a scalar with a chosen direction in space by an
expression that is linear in the direction cosines of the chosen direction.
Example 1.3
Consider the set of scalars which describe the velocity in a two dimensional Cartesian system:
v
i
=
_
v
x
v
y
_
,
where we return to the typical x, y coordinate system. In a rotated coordinate system, using the same
notation of Figure 1.3, we nd that
v
x
= v
x
cos + v
y
cos(/2 ) = v
x
cos + v
y
sin ,
v
y
= v
x
cos(/2 + ) + v
y
cos = v
x
sin + v
y
cos .
This is linear in the direction cosines, and satises the denition for a vector.
Example 1.4
Do two arbitrary scalars, say the quotient of pressure and density and the product of specic heat
and temperature, (p/, c
v
T)
T
, form a vector? If this quantity is a vector, then we can say
v
i
=
_
p/
c
v
T
_
.
This pair of numbers has an obvious physical meaning in our unrotated coordinate system. If the
system were a calorically perfect ideal gas, the rst component would represent the dierence between
the enthalpy and the internal energy, and the second component would represent the internal energy.
And if we rotate through an angle , we arrive at a transformed quantity of
v
1
=
p
cos + c
v
T cos(/2 ).
v
2
=
p
cos(/2 + ) + c
v
T cos().
This quantity does not have any known physical signicance, and so it seems that these quantities do
not form a vector.
We have the following vector algebra
Addition
w
i
= u
i
+ v
i
(Cartesian index notation)
w = u +v (Gibbs notation)
Dot product (inner product)
u
i
v
i
= b (Cartesian index notation)
u
T
v = b (Gibbs notation)
both notations require u
1
v
1
+ u
2
v
2
+ u
3
v
3
= b.
While u
i
and v
i
have scalar components which change under a rotation of axes, their inner
product (or dot product) is a true scalar and is invariant under a rotation of axes. Note that
here we have in the Gibbs notation explicitly noted that the transpose is part of the inner
product. Most authors in fact assume the inner product of two vectors implies the transpose
and do not write it explicitly, writing the inner product simply as u v u
T
v.
1.2.1.4 Tensors
1.2.1.4.1 Denition A second order tensor, or a rank two tensor, is nine scalar compo-
nents that under a rotation of axes transform according to the following rule:
T
ij
=
ki
lj
T
kl
. (1.42)
Note we could also write this in an expanded form as
T
ij
=
3
k=1
3
l=1
ki
lj
T
kl
=
3
k=1
3
l=1
T
ik
T
kl
lj
. (1.43)
In the above expressions, i and j are both free indices; while k and l are dummy indices.
The Gibbs notation for the above transformation is easily shown to be
T
= Q
T
T Q. (1.44)
Analogously to our conclusion for a vector, we say that a tensor associates a vector with
each direction in space by an expression that is linear in the direction cosines of the chosen
direction. For a given tensor T
ij
, the rst subscript is associated with the face of a unit cube
(hence the memory device, rst-face); the second subscript is associated with the vector
components for the vector on that face.
Tensors can also be expressed as matrices. Note that all rank two tensors are two-
dimensional matrices, but not all matrices are rank two tensors, as they do not necessarily
satisfy the transformation rules. We can say
T
ij
=
_
_
T
11
T
12
T
13
T
21
T
22
T
23
T
31
T
32
T
33
_
_
(1.45)
The rst row vector, ( T
11
T
12
T
13
), is the vector associated with the 1 face. The second
row vector, ( T
21
T
22
T
23
), is the vector associated with the 2 face. The third row vector,
( T
31
T
32
T
33
), is the vector associated with the 3 face.
We also have the following items associated with tensors.
1.2.1.4.2 Alternating unit tensor The alternating unit tensor, a tensor of rank 3,
ijk
will soon be seen to be useful, especially when we introduce the vector cross product. It is
dened as follows
ijk
=
_
_
_
1 if ijk = 123, 231, or 312,
0 if any two indices identical,
1 if ijk = 321, 213, or 132
. (1.46)
Another way to remember this is to start with the sequence 123, which is positive. A
sequential permutation, say from 123 to 231, retains the positive nature. A trade, say from
123 to 213, gives a negative value.
An identity which will be used extensively
ijk
ilm
=
jl
km
jm
kl
, (1.47)
can be proved a number of ways, including the tedious way of direct substitution for all
values of i, j, k, l, m.
1.2.1.4.3 Some secondary denitions
1.2.1.4.3.1 Transpose The transpose of a second rank tensor, denoted by a super-
script T, is found by exchanging elements about the diagonal. In shorthand index notation,
this is simply
(T
ij
)
T
= T
ji
. (1.48)
Written out in full, if
T
ij
=
_
_
T
11
T
12
T
13
T
21
T
22
T
23
T
31
T
32
T
33
_
_
, (1.49)
then
T
T
ij
= T
ji
=
_
_
T
11
T
21
T
31
T
12
T
22
T
32
T
13
T
23
T
33
_
_
, (1.50)
1.2.1.4.3.2 Symmetric A tensor D
ij
is symmetric i
D
ij
= D
ji
. (1.51)
Note that a symmetric tensor has only six independent scalars. We will see that D is
associated with the deformation of a uid element.
1.2.1.4.3.3 Antisymmetric A tensor R
ij
is anti-symmetric i
R
ij
= R
ji
. (1.52)
Note that an anti-symmetric tensor must have zeroes on its diagonal, and only three inde-
pendent scalars on o-diagonal elements. We will see that R is associated with the rotation
of a uid element.
1.2.1.4.3.4 Decomposition An arbitrary tensor T
ij
can be separated into a sym-
metric and anti-symmetric pair of tensors:
T
ij
=
1
2
T
ij
+
1
2
T
ij
+
1
2
T
ji
1
2
T
ji
. (1.53)
Rearranging, we get
T
ij
=
1
2
(T
ij
+ T
ji
)
. .
symmetric
+
1
2
(T
ij
T
ji
)
. .
antisymmetric
. (1.54)
The rst term must be symmetric, and the second term must be anti-symmetric. This is
easily seen by considering applying this to any matrix of actual numbers. If we dene the
symmetric part of the matrix T
ij
by the following notation
T
(ij)
=
1
2
(T
ij
+ T
ji
) , (1.55)
and the anti-symmetric part of the same matrix by the following notation
T
[ij]
=
1
2
(T
ij
T
ji
) , (1.56)
we then have
T
ij
= T
(ij)
+ T
[ij]
. (1.57)
1.2.1.4.4 Tensor inner product The tensor inner product of two tensors T
ij
and S
ji
is dened as follows
T
ij
S
ji
= a, (1.58)
where a is a scalar. In Gibbs notation, we would say
T : S = a. (1.59)
It is easily shown, and will be important in upcoming derivations, that the tensor inner
product of any symmetric tensor D with any anti-symmetric tensor R is the scalar zero:
D
ij
R
ji
= 0, (1.60)
D : R = 0. (1.61)
Further, if we decompose a tensor into its symmetric and anti-symmetric parts, T
ij
=
T
(ij)
+ T
[ij]
and take T
(ij)
= D
ij
= D and T
[ij]
= R
ij
= R, so that T = D + R, we note the
following common term can be expressed as a tensor inner product with a dyadic product:
x
i
T
ij
x
j
= x
T
T x, (1.62)
x
i
(T
(ij)
+ T
[ij]
)x
j
= x
T
(D +R) x, (1.63)
x
i
T
(ij)
x
j
= x
T
D x, (1.64)
T
(ij)
x
i
x
j
= D : xx
T
. (1.65)
1.2.1.4.5 Dual vector of a tensor We dene the dual vector, d
i
, of a tensor T
jk
as
follows
12
d
i
=
1
2
ijk
T
jk
=
1
2

ijk
T
(jk)
. .
=0
+
1
2
ijk
T
[jk]
. (1.66)
The term
ijk
is anti-symmetric for any xed i; thus when its tensor inner product is
taken with the symmetric T
(jk)
, the result must be the scalar zero. Hence, we also have
d
i
=
1
2
ijk
T
[jk]
. (1.67)
Lets nd the inverse relation for d
i
, Starting with Eq. (1.66), we take the inner product of
d
i
with
ilm
to get
ilm
d
i
=
1
2
ilm
ijk
T
jk
. (1.68)
Employing Eq. (1.47) to eliminate the s in favor of s, we get
ilm
d
i
=
1
2
(
lj
mk
lk
mj
) T
jk
, (1.69)
=
1
2
(T
lm
T
ml
), (1.70)
= T
[lm]
. (1.71)
12
There is a lack of uniformity in the literature in this area. First, note this denition diers from that
given by Panton by a factor of 1/2. It is closer, but not identical, to the approach found in Aris, p. 25.
Hence,
T
[lm]
=
ilm
d
i
. (1.72)
Note that
T
[lm]
=
1lm
d
1
+
2lm
d
2
+
3lm
d
3
=
_
_
0 d
3
d
2
d
3
0 d
1
d
2
d
1
0
_
_
. (1.73)
And we can write the decomposition of an arbitrary tensor as the sum of its symmetric
part and a factor related to the dual vector associated with its anti-symmetric part:
T
ij
..
arbitrary tensor
= T
(ij)
..
symmetric part
+
kij
d
k
. .
antisymmetric part
. (1.74)
1.2.1.4.6 Tensor product: two tensors The tensor product between two arbitrary
tensors yields a third tensor. For second order tensors, we have the tensor product in
Cartesian index notation as
S
ij
T
jk
= P
ik
. (1.75)
Note that j is a dummy index, i and k are free indices, and that the free indices in each
additive term are the same. In that sense they behave somewhat as dimensional units, which
must be the same for each term. In Gibbs notation, the equivalent tensor product is written
as
S T = P. (1.76)
Note that in contrast to the tensor inner product, which has two pairs of dummy indices
and two dots, the tensor product has one pair of dummy indices and one dot. The tensor
product is equivalent to matrix multiplication in matrix algebra.
An important property of tensors is that, in general, the tensor product does not commute,
S T = T S. In the most formal manifestation of Cartesian index notation, one should also
not commute the elements, and the dummy indices should appear next to another in adjacent
terms as above. However, it is of no great consequence to change the order of terms so that
we can write S
ij
T
jk
= T
jk
S
ij
. That is in Cartesian index notation, elements do commute.
But, in Cartesian index notation, the order of the indices is extremely important, and it is
this order that does not commute: S
ij
T
jk
= S
ji
T
jk
in general. The version presented above
S
ij
T
jk
, in which the dummy index j is juxtaposed between each term, is slightly preferable
as it maintains the order we nd in the Gibbs notation.
1.2.1.4.7 Vector product: vector and tensor The product of a vector and tensor,
again which does not in general commute, comes in two avors, pre-multiplication and post-
multiplication, both important, and given in Cartesian index and Gibbs notation below:
1.2.1.4.7.1 Pre-multiplication
u
j
= v
i
T
ij
= T
ij
v
i
, (1.77)
u = v
T
T = T v. (1.78)
In the Cartesian index notation above the rst form is preferred as it has a correspondence
with the Gibbs notation, but both are correct representations given our summation conven-
tion.
1.2.1.4.7.2 Post-multiplication
w
i
= T
ij
v
j
= v
j
T
ij
, (1.79)
w = T v = v
T
T. (1.80)
1.2.1.4.8 Dyadic product: two vectors As opposed to the inner product between two
vectors, which yields a scalar, we also have the dyadic product, which yields a tensor. In
Cartesian index and Gibbs notation, we have
T
ij
= u
i
v
j
= v
j
u
i
, (1.81)
T = uv
T
= vu
T
. (1.82)
Notice there is no dot in the dyadic product; the dot is reserved for the inner product.
1.2.1.4.9 Contraction We contract a general tensor, which has all of its subscripts
dierent, by setting one subscript to be the same as the other. A single contraction will
reduce the order of a tensor by two. For example the contraction of the second order tensor
T
ij
is T
ii
, which indicates a sum is to be performed:
T
ii
= T
11
+ T
22
+ T
33
. (1.83)
So, in this case the contraction yields a scalar. In matrix algebra, this particular contraction
is the trace of the matrix.
1.2.1.4.10 Vector cross product The vector cross product is dened in Cartesian index
and Gibbs notation as
w
i
=
ijk
u
j
v
k
, (1.84)
w = u v. (1.85)
Expanding for i = 1, 2, 3 gives
w
1
=
123
u
2
v
3
+
132
u
3
v
2
= u
2
v
3
u
3
v
2
, (1.86)
w
2
=
231
u
3
v
1
+
213
u
1
v
3
= u
3
v
1
u
1
v
3
, (1.87)
w
3
=
312
u
1
v
2
+
321
u
2
v
1
= u
1
v
2
u
2
v
1
. (1.88)
x
t
(2)
(1)
t
(3)
t
11
12
13
21
22
23
31
32
33
x
1
2
x
3
Figure 1.4: Sample Cartesian element which is aligned with coordinate axes, along with
tensor components and vectors associated with each face.
1.2.1.4.11 Vector associated with a plane We often have to select a vector which
is associated with a particular direction. Now for any direction we choose, there exists an
associated unit vector and normal plane. Recall that our notation has been dened so that
the rst index is associated with a face or direction, and the second index corresponds to
the components of the vector associated with that face. If we take n
i
to be a unit normal
vector associated with a given direction and normal plane, and we have been given a tensor
T
ij
, the vector t
j
associated with that plane is given in Cartesian index and Gibbs notation
by
t
j
= n
i
T
ij
, (1.89)
t
T
= n
T
T, (1.90)
t = T
T
n. (1.91)
A sketch of a Cartesian element with the tensor components sketched on the proper face is
shown in 1.4.
Example 1.5
For example, if we want to know the vector associated with the 1 face, t
(1)
, as shown in Figure 1.4,
we rst choose the unit normal associated with the x
1
face, which is the vector n
i
= (1, 0, 0)
T
. The
x
t
(2)
(1)
t
(3)
t
11
12
13
21
22
23
31
32
33
x
1
2
x
3
x
t
(2
)
(1
) t
(3
)
t
x
1
2
x
3
rotate
Figure 1.5: Sample Cartesian element which is rotated so that its faces have vectors which
are aligned with the unit normals associated with the faces of the element.
associated vector is found by doing the actual summation
t
j
= n
i
T
ij
= n
1
T
1j
+ n
2
T
2j
+ n
3
T
3j
. (1.92)
Now n
1
= 1, n
2
= 0, and n
3
= 0, so for this problem, we have
t
(1)
j
= T
1j
. (1.93)
1.2.2 Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
For a given tensor T
ij
, it is possible to select a plane for which the vector from T
ij
associated
with that plane points in the same direction as the normal associated with the chosen plane.
In fact for a three dimensional element, it is possible to choose three planes for which the
vector associated with the given planes is aligned with the unit normal associated with those
planes. We can think of this as nding a rotation as sketched in 1.5.
Mathematically, we can enforce this condition by requiring that
n
i
T
ij
..
vector associated with chosen direction
= n
j
..
scalar multiple of chosen direction
. (1.94)
Here is an as of yet unknown scalar. The vector n
i
could be a unit vector, but does not
have to be. We can rewrite this as
n
i
T
ij
= n
i
ij
. (1.95)
In Gibbs notation, this becomes n
T
T = n
T
I. In mathematics, this is known as a left
eigenvalue problem. Solutions n
i
which are non-trivial are known as left eigenvectors. We
can also formulate this as a right eigenvalue problem by taking the transpose of both sides
to obtain T
T
n = I n. Here we have used the fact that I
T
= I. We note that the left
eigenvectors of T are the right eigenvectors of T
T
. Eigenvalue problems are quite general
and arise whenever an operator operates on a vector to generate a vector which leaves the
original unchanged except in magnitude.
We can rearrange to form
n
i
(T
ij
ij
) = 0. (1.96)
In matrix notation, this can be written as
( n
1
n
2
n
3
)
_
_
T
11
T
12
T
13
T
21
T
22
T
23
T
31
T
32
T
33
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) . (1.97)
A trivial solution to this equation is (n
1
, n
2
, n
3
) = (0, 0, 0). But this is not interesting. We
get a non-unique, non-trivial solution if we enforce the condition that the determinant of the
coecient matrix be zero. As we have an unknown parameter , we have sucient degrees
of freedom to accomplish this. So, we require
T
11
T
12
T
13
T
21
T
22
T
23
T
31
T
32
T
33
= 0 (1.98)
We know from linear algebra that such an equation for a third order matrix gives rise to a
characteristic polynomial for of the form
13
3
I
(1)
T

2
+ I
(2)
T
I
(3)
T
= 0, (1.99)
where I
(1)
T
, I
(2)
T
, I
(3)
T
are scalars which are functions of all the scalars T
ij
. The I
T
s are known
as the invariants of the tensor T
ij
. They can be shown to be given by
14
I
(1)
T
= T
ii
= tr T, (1.100)
I
(2)
T
=
1
2
(T
ii
T
jj
T
ij
T
ji
) =
1
2
_
(tr T)
2
tr (T T)
_
= (det T)
_
tr T
1
_
, (1.101)
=
1
2
_
T
(ii)
T
(jj)
+ T
[ij]
T
[ij]
T
(ij)
T
(ij)
_
, (1.102)
I
(3)
T
=
ijk
T
1i
T
2j
T
3k
= det T. (1.103)
13
We employ a slightly more common form here than the very similar Eq. (3.10.4) of Panton.
14
Note the obvious error in the third of Pantons Eq. (3.10.5), where the indices j and q appear three
times.
Here det denotes the determinant. It can also be shown that if
(1)
,
(2)
,
(3)
are the three
eigenvalues, then the invariants can also be expressed as
I
(1)
T
=
(1)
+
(2)
+
(3)
, (1.104)
I
(2)
T
=
(1)
(2)
+
(2)
(3)
+
(3)
(1)
, (1.105)
I
(3)
T
=
(1)
(2)
(3)
. (1.106)
In general these eigenvalues, and consequently, the eigenvectors are complex. Addition-
ally, in general the eigenvectors are non-orthogonal. If, however, the matrix we are consider-
ing is symmetric, which is often the case in uid mechanics, it can be formally proven that
all the eigenvalues are real and all the eigenvectors are real and orthogonal. If for instance,
our tensor is the stress tensor, we will show that it is symmetric in the absence of external
couples. The eigenvectors of the stress tensor can form the basis for an intrinsic coordinate
system which has its axes aligned with the principal stress on a uid element. The eigenval-
ues themselves give the value of the principal stress. This is actually a generalization of the
familiar Mohrs circle from solid mechanics.
Example 1.6
Find the principal axes and principal values of stress if the stress tensor is
T
ij
=
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 2
0 2 1
_
_
. (1.107)
A sketch of these stresses is shown on the uid element in Figure 1.6. We take the eigenvalue problem
n
i
T
ij
= n
j
, (1.108)
= n
i
ij
, (1.109)
n
i
(T
ij

ij
) = 0. (1.110)
This becomes for our problem
( n
1
n
2
n
3
)
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 2
0 2 1
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) . (1.111)
For a non-trivial solution for n
i
, we must have
1 0 0
0 1 2
0 2 1
= 0. (1.112)
This gives rise to the polynomial equation
(1 ) ((1 )(1 ) 4) = 0. (1.113)
This has three solutions
= 1, = 1, = 3. (1.114)
x
2
x
3
x
1
Figure 1.6: Sketch of stresses being applied to a cubical uid element. The thinner lines
with arrows are the components of the stress tensor; the thicker lines on each face represent
the vector associated with the particular face.
Notice all eigenvalues are real, which we expect since the tensor is symmetric.
Now lets nd the eigenvectors (aligned with the principal axes of stress) for this problem First, it
can easily be shown that when the vector product of a vector with a tensor commutes when the tensor
is symmetric. Although this is not a crucial step, we will use it to write the eigenvalue problem in a
slightly more familiar notation:
n
i
(T
ij

ij
) = 0 =(T
ij

ij
) n
i
= 0, because scalar components commute. (1.115)
Because of symmetry, we can now commute the indices to get
(T
ji
ji
) n
i
= 0, because indices commute if symmetric. (1.116)
Expanding into matrix notation, we get
_
_
T
11
T
21
T
31
T
12
T
22
T
32
T
13
T
23
T
33
_
_
_
_
n
1
n
2
n
3
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (1.117)
Note, we have taken the transpose of T in the above equation. Substituting for T
ji
and considering the
eigenvalue = 1, we get
_
_
0 0 0
0 0 2
0 2 0
_
_
_
_
n
1
n
2
n
3
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (1.118)
We get two equations 2n
2
= 0, and 2n
3
= 0, which require that n
2
= n
3
= 0. We can satisfy all
equations with an arbitrary value of n
1
. It is always the case that an eigenvector will have an arbitrary
magnitude and a well-dened direction. Here we will choose to normalize our eigenvector and take
n
1
= 1, so that the eigenvector is
n
j
=
_
_
1
0
0
_
_
for = 1. (1.119)
Note, geometrically this means that the original 1 face already has an associated vector which is aligned
with its normal vector.
Now consider the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue = 1. Again substituting into the
original equation, we get
_
_
2 0 0
0 2 2
0 2 2
_
_
_
_
n
1
n
2
n
3
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (1.120)
This is simply the system of equations
2n
1
= 0, (1.121)
2n
2
+ 2n
3
= 0, (1.122)
2n
2
+ 2n
3
= 0. (1.123)
Clearly n
1
= 0. We could take n
2
= 1 and n
3
= 1 for a non-trivial solution. Alternatively, lets
normalize and take
n
j
=
_
_
0
2
2
2
2
_
_
. (1.124)
Finally consider the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue = 3. Again substituting into the
original equation, we get
_
_
2 0 0
0 2 2
0 2 2
_
_
_
_
n
1
n
2
n
3
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (1.125)
This is the system of equations
2n
1
= 0, (1.126)
2n
2
+ 2n
3
= 0, (1.127)
2n
2
2n
3
= 0. (1.128)
Clearly again n
1
= 0. We could take n
2
= 1 and n
3
= 1 for a non-trivial solution. Once again, lets
normalize and take
n
j
=
_
_
0
2
2
2
2
_
_
. (1.129)
In summary, the three eigenvectors and associated eigenvalues are
n
(1)
j
=
_
_
1
0
0
_
_
for
(1)
= 1, (1.130)
n
(2)
j
=
_
_
0
2
2
2
2
_
_
for
(2)
= 1, (1.131)
n
(3)
j
=
_
_
0
2
2
2
2
_
_
for
(3)
= 3. (1.132)
Note that the eigenvectors are mutually orthogonal, as well as normal. We say they form an orthonormal
set of vectors. Their orthogonality, as well as the fact that all the eigenvalues are real can be shown to
be a direct consequence of the symmetry of the original tensor. A sketch of the principal stresses on
the element rotated so that it is aligned with the principal axes of stress is shown on the uid element
in Figure 1.7.
= 3
(3)
= -1
(2)
= 1
(1)
x
2
x
3
Figure 1.7: Sketch of uid element rotated to be aligned with axes of principal stress, along
with magnitude of principal stress. The 1 face projects out of the page.
Example 1.7
For a given stress tensor, which we will take to be symmetric though the theory applies to non-
symmetric tensors as well,
T
ij
= T =
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
, (1.133)
nd the three basic tensor invariants of stress I
(1)
T
, I
(2)
T
, and I
(3)
T
, and show they are truly invariant
when the tensor is subjected to a rotation with direction cosine matrix of
ij
= Q =
_
_
_
1
6
_
2
3
1
6
1
3

1
3
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
_
_
_ (1.134)
Calculation reveals that
det Q = 1, (1.135)
and that Q Q
T
= I, so that Q is a rotation matrix.
The eigenvalues of T, which are the principal values of stress are easily calculated to be
(1)
= 5.28675,
(2)
= 3.67956,
(3)
= 3.39281. (1.136)
The three invariants of T
ij
are
I
(1)
T
= tr T = tr
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
= 1 + 3 + 1 = 5, (1.137)
I
(2)
T
=
1
2
_
(tr T)
2
tr (T T)
_
=
1
2
_
_
_
_
_
tr
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
_
_
2
tr
_
_
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_,
=
1
2
_
_
5
2
tr
_
_
21 4 6
4 14 4
6 4 18
_
_
_
_
,
=
1
2
(25 21 14 18),
= 14, (1.138)
I
(3)
T
= det T = det
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
= 66. (1.139)
Now when we rotate the tensor T, we get a transformed tensor given by
T
= Q
T
T Q =
_
_
_
1
6
1
3
1
2
_
2
3

1
3
0
1
6
1
3

1
2
_
_
_
_
_
1 2 4
2 3 1
4 1 1
_
_
_
_
_
1
6
_
2
3
1
6
1
3

1
3
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
_
_
_,
=
_
_
4.10238 2.52239 1.60948
2.52239 0.218951 2.91291
1.60948 2.91291 1.11657
_
_
. (1.140)
We then seek the tensor invariants of T
. Leaving out some of the details, which are the same as those
for calculating the invariants of the T, we nd the invariants indeed are invariant:
I
(1)
T
= 4.10238 0.218951 + 1.11657 = 5, (1.141)
I
(2)
T
=
1
2
(5
2
53) = 14, (1.142)
I
(3)
T
= 66. (1.143)
Finally, we verify that the stress invariants are indeed related to the principal values (the eigenvalues
of the stress tensor) as follows
I
(1)
T
=
(1)
+
(2)
+
(3)
= 5.28675 3.67956 + 3.39281 = 5, (1.144)
I
(2)
T
=
(1)
(2)
+
(2)
(3)
+
(3)
(1)
,
= (5.28675)(3.67956) + (3.67956)(3.39281) + (3.39281)(5.28675) = 14, (1.145)
I
(3)
T
=
(1)
(2)
(3)
= (5.28675)(3.67956)(3.39281) = 66. (1.146)
1.2.3 Grad, div, curl, etc.
Thus far, we have mainly dealt with the algebra of vectors and tensors. Now let us consider
the calculus. For now, let us consider variables which are a function of the spatial vector x
i
.
We shall soon allow variation with time t also. We will typically encounter quantities such
as
(x
i
) a scalar function of the position vector,
v
j
(x
i
) a vector function of the position vector, or
T
jk
(x
i
) a tensor function of the position vector.
1.2.3.1 Gradient operator
The gradient operator, sometimes denoted by grad, is motivated as follows. Consider
(x
i
), which when written in full is
(x
i
) = (x
1
, x
2
, x
3
). (1.147)
Taking a derivative using the chain rule gives
d =

x
1
dx
1
+

x
2
dx
2
+

x
3
dx
3
. (1.148)
Following Panton, we dene a non-traditional, but useful further notation
i
for the partial
derivative
i

x
i
=

x
1
e
1
+

x
2
e
2
+

x
3
e
3
= =
_
_
x
1
x
2
x
3
_
_
=
_
_
3
_
_
, (1.149)
so that the chain rule is actually
d =
1
dx
1
+
2
dx
2
+
3
dx
3
, (1.150)
which is written using our summation convention as
d =
i
dx
i
. (1.151)
After commuting so as to juxtapose the i subscript, we have
d = dx
i
i
. (1.152)
In Gibbs notation, we say
d = dx
T
= dx
T
grad . (1.153)
We can also take the transpose of both sides, recalling that the transpose of a scalar is the
scalar itself, to obtain
(d)
T
=
_
dx
T

_
T
, (1.154)
d = ()
T
dx, (1.155)
d =
T
dx. (1.156)
Here we expand
T
as
T
= (
1
,
2
,
3
). When
i
or operates on a scalar, it is known as
the gradient operator. The gradient operator operating on a scalar function gives rise to a
vector function.
We next describe the gradient operator operating on a vector. For vectors in Cartesian
index and Gibbs notation, we have, following a similar analysis
15
dv
i
= dx
j
j
v
i
=
j
v
i
dx
j
,
dv
T
= dx
T
v
T
,
dv = (v
T
)
T
dx,
dv = (grad v)
T
dx. (1.157)
Here the quantity
j
v
i
is the gradient of a vector, which is a tensor. So the gradient operator
operating on a vector raises its order by one. Note that the Gibbs notation with transposes
suggests properly that the gradient of a vector can be expanded as
v
T
=
_
_
3
_
_
( v
1
v
2
v
3
) =
_
_
1
v
1

1
v
2

1
v
3
2
v
1

2
v
2

2
v
3
3
v
1

3
v
2

3
v
3
_
_
. (1.158)
Lastly we consider the gradient operator operating on a tensor. For tensors in Cartesian
index notation, we have, following a similar analysis
dT
ij
= dx
k
k
T
ij
=
k
T
ij
dx
k
,
(1.159)
Here the quantity
k
T
ij
is a third order tensor. So the gradient operator operating on a
tensor raises its order by one as well. The Gibbs notation is not straightforward as it can
involve something akin to the transpose of a three-dimensional matrix.
1.2.3.2 Divergence operator
The contraction of the gradient operator on either a vector or a tensor is known as the
divergence, sometimes denoted by div. For the divergence of a vector, we have
i
v
i
=
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
+
3
v
3
=
T
v = div v. (1.160)
The divergence of a vector is a scalar.
For the divergence of a second order tensor, we have
i
T
ij
=
1
T
1j
+
2
T
2j
+
3
T
3j
=
T
T = div T. (1.161)
15
A more common approach, not using the transpose notation, would be to say here for the Gibbs notation
that dv = dx v. However, this is only works if we consider dv to be a row vector, as dx v is a row vector.
All in all, while at times clumsy, the transpose notation allows a for great deal of clarity and consistency
with matrix algebra.
The divergence operator operating on a tensor gives rise to a row vector. We will sometimes
have to transpose this row vector in order to arrive at a column vector, e.g. we will have
need for the column vector
_
T
T
_
T
. We note that, as with the vector inner product, most
texts assume the transpose operation is understood and write the divergence of a vector or
tensor simply as v or T.
1.2.3.3 Curl operator
The curl operator is the derivative analog to the cross product. We write it in the following
three ways:
i
=
ijk
j
v
k
,
= v, (1.162)
= curl v.
Expanding for i = 1, 2, 3 gives
1
=
123
2
v
3
+
132
3
v
2
=
2
v
3
3
v
2
,
2
=
231
3
v
1
+
213
1
v
3
=
3
v
1
1
v
3
,
3
=
312
1
v
2
+
321
2
v
1
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
. (1.163)
1.2.3.4 Laplacian operator
The Laplacian
16
operator can operate on a scalar, vector, or tensor function. It is a simple
combination of rst the gradient followed by the divergence. It yields a function of the same
order as that which it operates on. For its most common operation on a scalar, it is denoted
by as follows
i
=
T
=
2
= div grad . (1.164)
In viscous uid ow, we will have occasion to have the Laplacian operate on vector:
i
v
j
=
_
T
v
T
_
T
=
_
2
v
T
_
T
=
2
v = div grad v. (1.165)
1.2.3.5 Relevant theorems
We will use several theorems which are developed in vector calculus. Here we give the
simplest of motivations, and simply present them. The reader should consult a standard
mathematics text for detailed derivations.
16
Pierre-Simon Laplace, 1749-1827, Normandy-born French astronomer of humble origin. Educated at
Caen, taught in Paris at

Ecole Militaire.
1.2.3.5.1 Fundamental theorem of calculus The fundamental theorem of calculus is
as follows
_
x=b
x=a
f(x) dx =
_
x=b
x=a
_
d
dx
_
dx = (b) (a). (1.166)
It eectively says that to nd the integral of a function f(x), which is the area under the
curve, it suces to nd a function , whose derivative is f, and evaluate at each endpoint,
and take the dierence to nd the area under the curve.
1.2.3.5.2 Gausss theorem Gausss
17
theorem is the analog of the fundamental theorem
of calculus extended to volume integrals. It applies to tensor functions of arbitrary order
and is as follows: _
R
i
(T
jk...
) dV =
_
S
n
i
T
jk...
dS (1.167)
Here R is an arbitrary volume, dV is the element of volume, S is the surface that bounds
V , n
i
is the outward unit normal to S, and T
jk..
is an arbitrary tensor function. The surface
integral is analogous to evaluating the function at the end points in the fundamental theorem
of calculus.
Note if we take T
jk...
to be the scalar of unity (whose derivative must be zero), Gausss
theorem reduces to
_
S
n
i
dS = 0. (1.168)
That is the unit normal to the surface integrated over the surface, cancels to zero when the
entire surface is included.
We will use Gausss theorem extensively. It allows us to convert sometimes dicult
volume integrals into easier interpreted surface integrals. It is often useful to use this theorem
as a means of toggling back and forth from one form to another.
1.2.3.5.3 Stokes theorem Stokes
18
theorem is as follows.
_
S
n
i
ijk
j
v
k
dS =
_
C
i
v
i
ds. (1.169)
Once again S is a bounding surface and n
i
is its outward unit normal. The integral with the
circle through it denotes a closed contour integral with respect to arc length s, and
i
is the
unit tangent vector to the bounding curve C.
In Gibbs notation, it is written as
_
S
n
T
v dS =
_
C
T
v ds. (1.170)
17
Carl Friedrich Gauss, 1777-1855, Brunswick-born German mathematician, considered the founder of
modern mathematics. Worked in astronomy, physics, crystallography, optics, biostatistics, and mechanics.
Studied and taught at Gottingen.
18
Sir George Gabriel Stokes, 1819-1903, Irish-born British physicist and mathematician, holder of the Lu-
casian chair of Mathematics at Cambridge University, developed, simultaneously with Navier, the governing
equations of uid motion, in a form which was more robust than that of Navier.
1.2.3.5.4 Kinetic energy divergence identity It is easy to show that a useful identity
involving the divergence of specic kinetic energy holds:
v
j
j
v
i
=
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
, (1.171)
_
v
T

_
v =
_
1
2
v
T
v
_
v . (1.172)
This is easily proved by considering the right hand side of Eq. (1.171), expanding, and using
Eqs. (1.162) and then (1.47):
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
= v
j
i
v
j
ijk
v
j

klm
l
v
m
. .
=
k
, (1.173)
= v
j
i
v
j
kij
klm
v
j
l
v
m
, (1.174)
= v
j
i
v
j
(
il
jm
im
jl
) v
j
l
v
m
, (1.175)
= v
j
i
v
j
v
j
i
v
j
. .
=0
+v
j
j
v
i
, (1.176)
= v
j
j
v
i
, QED. (1.177)
1.2.3.5.5 Leibnizs rule Leibnizs
19
rule relates time derivatives of integral quantities
to a form which distinguishes changes which are happening within the boundaries to changes
due to uxes through boundaries. It is a generalization of the more familiar control volume
approach which uses the Reynolds
20
transport theorem. Leibnizs rule applied to an arbitrary
tensorial function is as follows:
d
dt
_
R(t)
T
jk...
(x
i
, t) dV =
_
R(t)
T
jk...
t
dV +
_
S(t)
n
l
w
l
T
jk...
dS. (1.178)
R(t) arbitrary moving volume,
S(t) bounding surface of the arbitrary moving volume,
w
l
velocity vector of points on the moving surface,
n
l
unit normal to moving surface.
19
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, 1646-1716, Leipzig-born German philosopher and mathematician. In-
vented calculus independent of Newton and employed a superior notation to that of Newton.
20
Osborne Reynolds, 1842-1912, Belfast-born British engineer and physicist, educated in mathematics at
Cambridge, rst professor of engineering at Owens College, Manchester, did fundamental experimental work
in uid mechanics and heat transfer.
Say we have the very special case in which T
jk...
= 1; then Leibnizs rule reduces to
d
dt
_
R(t)
dV =
_
R(t)
t
(1) dV +
_
S(t)
n
k
w
k
(1) dS, (1.179)
dV
R
dt
=
_
S(t)
n
k
w
k
dS. (1.180)
This simply says the total volume of the region, which we call V
R
, changes in response to
net motion of the bounding surface.
1.2.3.5.6 Reynolds transport theorem Leibnizs rule reduces to the Reynolds trans-
port theorem if we replace the tensor function T
jk...
with a scalar function, say f. Further,
considering one-dimensional cases only, we can then say
d
dt
_
x=b(t)
x=a(t)
f(x, t) dx =
_
x=b(t)
x=a(t)
f
t
dx +
db
dt
f(b(t), t)
da
dt
f(a(t), t). (1.181)
As in the fundamental theorem of calculus, for the one-dimensional case, we do not have to
evaluate a surface integral; instead, we simply must consider the function at its endpoints.
Here db/dt and da/dt are the velocities of the bounding surface and analogous to w
k
. The
terms f(b(t), t) and f(a(t), t) are equivalent to evaluating T
jk..
on S(t).
1.3 Kinematics
The previous section was in many ways a discussion of geometry or place. Here we will
consider kinematics, the study of motion in space. Here we will pay no regard to what
causes the motion. If we knew the position of every uid particle as a function of time, then
we could in principle also describe the velocity and acceleration of each particle. We could
also make statements about how groups of particles translate, rotate, and deform. This is
the essence of kinematics.
Fluid motion is generally a highly non-linear event. In this section, we will develop tools,
using a local linear analysis, to break down the most complex uid ows to a summation of
fundamental motions.
1.3.1 Lagrangian description
A Lagrangian
21
description is similar to a classical description of motion in that each uid
particle is eectively labeled and tracked in terms of its initial position x
o
j
and time

t. We
take the position vector of a particle r
i
to be
r
i
= r
i
(x
o
j
,
t). (1.182)
21
Joseph-Louis Lagrange (originally Giuseppe Luigi Lagrangia), 1736-1813, Italian born, Italian-French
mathematician. Worked on celestial mechanics and the three body problem. Worked in Berlin and Paris.
Part of the committee which formulated the metric system.
1.3. KINEMATICS 47
The velocity v
i
of a particular particle is the time derivative of its position, holding x
o
j
xed:
v
i
=
r
i
x
o
j
(1.183)
The acceleration a
i
of a particular particle is the second time derivative of its position,
holding x
o
j
xed:
a
i
=

2
r
i
t
2
x
o
j
(1.184)
We can also write other variables as functions of time and initial position, for example, we
could have for pressure p(x
o
j
,
t).
The Lagrangian description has important pedagogical value, but is only occasionally
used in practice, except maybe where it can be useful to illustrate a particular point. In
solid mechanics, it is often critically important to know the location of each solid element,
and it is the method of choice.
1.3.2 Eulerian description
It is more common in uid mechanics to use the Eulerian description of uid motion. In
this description, all variables are taken to be functions of time and local position, rather
than initial position. Here, we will take the local position to be given by the position vector
x
i
= r
i
. The transformation from Lagrangian coordinates to Eulerian coordinates is given
by
x
i
= r
i
(x
o
j
,
t),
t =

t. (1.185)
1.3.3 Material derivatives
The material derivative is the derivative following a uid particle. It is also known as the
substantial derivative or the total derivative. It is trivial in Lagrangian coordinates, since
by denition, a Lagrangian description tracks a uid particle. It is not as straightforward in
the Eulerian viewpoint.
Consider a uid property such as temperature or pressure, which we will call F here,
which is function of position and time. We can characterize the position and time in either
an Eulerian or Lagrangian fashion. Let the Lagrangian representation be F = F
L
(x
o
j
,
t) and
the Eulerian representation be F = F
E
(x
i
, t). Now both formulations must give the same
result at the same time and position; applying our transformation between the two systems
thus yields
F = F
L
(x
o
j
,
t) = F
E
(x
i
= r
i
(x
o
j
,
t), t =

t). (1.186)
Now from basic calculus we have
dx
i
=
r
i
x
o
j
d
t +
r
i
x
o
j
t
dx
o
j
. (1.187)
From basic calculus, we also have
dF
L
=
F
L
x
o
j
d
t +
F
L
x
o
j
t
dx
o
j
, (1.188)
dF
E
=
F
E
t
x
i
dt +
F
E
x
i
t
dx
i
. (1.189)
Now, we must have dF = dF
L
= dF
E
for the same uid particle, so making substitutions
from above, we get
F
L
x
o
j
d
t +
F
L
x
o
j
t
dx
o
j
=
F
E
t
x
i
dt +
F
E
x
i
t
_
r
i
x
o
j
d
t +
r
i
x
o
j
t
dx
o
j
_
. (1.190)
For the variation of F of a particular particle, we hold x
o
j
xed, so that dx
o
j
= 0. Using also
the fact that

t = t, so d
t = dt, and dividing by d
t, we get
F
L
x
o
j
=
F
E
t
x
i
+
F
E
x
i
t
r
i
x
o
j
, (1.191)
and using the denition of uid particle velocity, Eq. (1.183), we get
F
L
x
o
j
=
F
E
t
x
i
+ v
i
F
E
x
i
t
. (1.192)
Ignoring the operand F, F
L
, and F
E
, we can write the derivative following a particle in the
following manner as an operator
x
o
j
=

t
x
i
+ v
i
x
i
t
=

t
x
+v
T
=

t
x
+v
T
grad
D
Dt

d
dt
(1.193)
We will generally use the following shorthand for the derivative following a particle:
d
dt
=
o
+ v
i
i
. (1.194)
Here a second shorthand for the partial derivative with respect to time has been introduced:
o
/t|
x
i
.
1.3. KINEMATICS 49
1.3.4 Streamlines
Streamlines are lines which are everywhere instantaneously parallel to velocity vectors. If a
dierential vector dx
k
is parallel to a velocity vector v
j
, then the cross product of the two
vectors must be zero; hence for a streamline, we must have
ijk
v
j
dx
k
= 0. (1.195)
In Gibbs notation, we would say
v dx = 0. (1.196)
Recalling that the cross product can be interpreted as a determinant, we get this condition
to reduce to

e
1
e
2
e
3
v
1
v
2
v
3
dx
1
dx
2
dx
3
= 0. (1.197)
Expanding the determinant gives
e
1
(v
2
dx
3
v
3
dx
2
) +e
2
(v
3
dx
1
v
1
dx
3
) +e
3
(v
1
dx
2
v
2
dx
1
) = 0. (1.198)
Since the basis vectors e
1
, e
2
, and e
3
are linearly independent, the coecient on each of
them must be zero, giving rise to
v
2
dx
3
= v
3
dx
2
,
dx
3
v
3
=
dx
2
v
2
, (1.199)
v
3
dx
1
= v
1
dx
3
,
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
3
v
3
, (1.200)
v
1
dx
2
= v
2
dx
1
,
dx
2
v
2
=
dx
1
v
1
. (1.201)
(1.202)
Combining, we get
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
=
dx
3
v
3
. (1.203)
At a xed instant in time, t = t
o
, we set the above terms all equal to an arbitrary dierential
parameter d to obtain
dx
1
v
1
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
)
=
dx
2
v
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
)
=
dx
3
v
3
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
)
= d. (1.204)
Here should not be thought of as time, but just as a dummy parameter. Streamlines are
only dened at a xed time. While they will generally look dierent at dierent times, in
the process of actually integrating to obtain them, time does not enter into the calculation.
We then divide each equation by d and nd the above equations are equivalent to a system
of dierential equations of the autonomous form
dx
1
d
= v
1
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
), x
1
( = 0) = x
1o
, (1.205)
dx
2
d
= v
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
), x
2
( = 0) = x
2o
, (1.206)
dx
3
d
= v
3
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
; t = t
o
), x
3
( = 0) = x
3o
. (1.207)
After integration, which in general must be done numerically, we nd
x
1
(; t
o
, x
1o
), (1.208)
x
2
(; t
o
, x
2o
), (1.209)
x
3
(; t
o
, x
3o
), (1.210)
where we let the parameter vary over whatever domain we choose.
1.3.5 Pathlines
The pathlines are the locus of points traversed by a particular uid particle. For an Eulerian
description of motion where the velocity eld is known as a function of space and time
v
j
(x
i
, t), we can get the pathlines by integrating the following set of three non-autonomous
ordinary dierential equations, with the associated initial conditions:
dx
1
dt
= v
1
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
1
(t = t
o
) = x
1o
, (1.211)
dx
2
dt
= v
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
2
(t = t
o
) = x
2o
, (1.212)
dx
3
dt
= v
3
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
3
(t = t
o
) = x
3o
. (1.213)
In general these are non-linear equations, and often require full numerical solution, which
gives us
x
1
(t; x
1o
), (1.214)
x
2
(t; x
2o
), (1.215)
x
3
(t; x
3o
). (1.216)
1.3.6 Streaklines
A streakline is the locus of points that have passed through a particular point at some past
time t =

t. Streaklines can be found by integrating a similar set of equations to those for
1.3. KINEMATICS 51
pathlines.
dx
1
dt
= v
1
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
1
(t =

t) = x
1o
, (1.217)
dx
2
dt
= v
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
2
(t =

t) = x
2o
, (1.218)
dx
3
dt
= v
3
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), x
3
(t =

t) = x
3o
. (1.219)
After integration, which is generally done numerically, we get
x
1
(t; x
1o
,
t), (1.220)
x
2
(t; x
2o
,
t), (1.221)
x
3
(t; x
3o
,
t). (1.222)
Then, if we x time t and the particular point in which we are interested (x
1o
, x
2o
, x
3o
)
T
, we
get a parametric representation of a streakline
x
1
(
t), (1.223)
x
2
(
t), (1.224)
x
3
(
t). (1.225)
Example 1.8
If v
1
= 2x
1
+ t, v
2
= x
2
2t, nd a) the streamline through the point (1, 1)
T
at t = 1, b) the
pathline for the uid particle which is at the point (1, 1)
T
at t = 1, and c) the streakline through the
point (1, 1)
T
at t = 1.
a) streamline
For the streamline we have the following set of dierential equations,
dx
1
d
= 2x
1
+ t|
t=1
, x
1
( = 0) = 1,
dx
2
d
= x
2
2t|
t=1
, x
2
( = 0) = 1.
Here it is inconsequential where the parameter has its origin, as long as some value of corresponds
to a streamline through (1, 1)
T
, so we have taken the origin for = 0 to be the point (1, 1)
T
. These
equations at t = 1 are
dx
1
d
= 2x
1
+ 1, x
1
( = 0) = 1,
dx
2
d
= x
2
2, x
2
( = 0) = 1.
Solving, we get
x
1
=
3
2
e
2
1
2
,
x
2
= e
+ 2.
Solving for , we nd
=
1
2
ln
_
2
3
_
x
1
+
1
2
__
.
So, eliminating and writing x
2
(x
1
), we get the streamline to be
x
2
= 2
2
3
_
x
1
+
1
2
_
.
b) pathline
For the pathline we have the following equations
dx
1
dt
= 2x
1
+ t, x
1
(t = 1) = 1,
dx
2
dt
= x
2
2t, x
2
(t = 1) = 1.
These have solution
x
1
=
7
4
e
2(t1)
t
2

1
4
,
x
2
= 3e
t1
+ 2t + 2.
It is algebraically dicult to eliminate t so as to write x
2
(x
1
) explicitly. However, the above certainly
gives a parametric representation of the pathline, which can be plotted in x
1
, x
2
space.
c) streakline
For the streakline we have the following equations
dx
1
dt
= 2x
1
+ t, x
1
(t =

t) = 1,
dx
2
dt
= x
2
2t, x
2
(t =

t) = 1.
These have solution
x
1
=
5 + 2
t
4
e
2(t
t)
t
2

1
4
,
x
2
= (1 + 2
t)e
t
t
+ 2t + 2.
We evaluate the streakline at t = 1 and get
x
1
=
5 + 2
t
4
e
2(1
t)
3
4
,
x
2
= (1 + 2
t)e
1
t
+ 4.
Once again, it is algebraically dicult to eliminate

t so as to write x
2
(x
1
) explicitly. However, the
above gives a parametric representation of the streakline, which can be plotted in x
1
, x
2
space.
A plot of the streamline, pathline, and streakline for this problem is shown in Figure 1.8. Note
that at the point (1, 1)
T
, all three intersect with the same slope. This can also be deduced from the
equations governing streamlines, pathlines, and streaklines.
1.3. KINEMATICS 53
2 4 6 8
0.5
1
1.5
streakline
streamline
pathline
x
1
x
2
Figure 1.8: Streamline, pathlines, and streaklines for unsteady ow of example problem.
1.3.7 Kinematic decomposition of motion
In general the motion of a uid is non-linear in nearly all respects. Certainly, it is common
for particle pathlines to be far from straight lines; however, this is not actually a hallmark
of non-linearity in that linear theories of uid motion routinely predict pathlines with nite
curvature. More to the point, we cannot in general use the method of superposition to add
one ow to another to generate a third. One fundamental source of non-linearity is the
non-linear operator v
i
i
, which we will see appears in most of our governing equations.
However, the local behavior of uids is nearly always dominated by linear eects. By
analyzing only the linear eects induced by small changes in velocity, which we will associate
with the velocity gradient, we will learn a great deal about the richness of uid motion. In
the linear analysis, we will see that a uid particles motion can be described as a summation
of a linear translation, rotation as a solid body, and straining of two types: extensional and
shear. Both types of straining can be thought of as deformation rates. We use the word
straining in contrast to strain to distinguish uid and exible solid behavior. Generally
it is the rate of change of strain (that is the straining) which has most relevance for a
uid, while it is the actual strain that has the most relevance for a exible solid. This is
because the stress in a exible solid responds to strain, while the stress in a uid responds to
a strain rate. Nevertheless, while strain itself is associated with equilibrium congurations
of a exible solid, when its motion is decomposed, strain rate is relevant. In contrast, a rigid
solid can be described by only a sum of linear translation and rotation. A point mass only
x
1
x
2
x
3
v
i
v
i
dv
i
v + dv
i i
dx = ds
i i
P
P
Figure 1.9: Sketch of uid particle P in motion with velocity v
i
and nearby neighbor particle
P
with velocity v
i
+ dv
i
.
translates; it cannot rotate or strain.
uid motion = translation + rotation + extensional straining + shear straining
. .
straining
,
exible solid motion = translation + rotation + extensional straining + shear straining
. .
straining
,
rigid solid motion = translation + rotation,
point mass motion = translation.
Let us consider in detail the conguration shown in Figure 1.9. Here we have a uid
particle at point P with coordinates x
i
and velocity v
i
. A small distance dr
i
= dx
i
away is
the uid particle at point P
, with coordinates x
i
+ dx
i
. This particle moves with velocity
v
i
+ dv
i
. We can describe the dierence in location by the product of a unit tangent vector
i
and a scalar dierential distance magnitude ds: dr
i
= dx
i
=
i
ds. Note that
i
is in
general not aligned with the velocity vector, and the dierential distance ds is not associated
with the arc length along a particle path. Later in Sec. 1.3.12, we will select an alignment
with the particle path, and thus choose
i
=
ti
and ds = ds, where
ti
is the unit tangent
to the particle path and ds is the arc length.
1.3.7.1 Translation
We have the motion at P
to be v
i
+dv
i
. Obviously, the rst term v
i
represents translation.
1.3.7.2 Solid body rotation and straining
What remains is dv
i
, and we shall see that it is appropriate to characterize this term by both
a solid body rotation combined with straining.
We have from the chain rule that
dv
j
= dx
i
i
v
j
, (1.226)
dv
T
= dx
T
v
T
, (1.227)
1.3. KINEMATICS 55
dv =
_
v
T
_
T
dx, (1.228)
dv = F
T
dx. (1.229)
Here
i
v
j
= v
T
F is the velocity gradient tensor. We can break
i
v
j
into a symmetric
and anti-symmetric part and say then
dv
j
= dx
i
(i
v
j)
. .
Shear and extensional straining
+dx
i
[i
v
j]
. .
Rotation
(1.230)
We also will nd it useful to decompose the velocity gradient tensor F into a deformation
tensor, D:
D = D
ij

(i
v
j)
, (1.231)
a rotation tensor R:
R = R
ij

[i
v
j]
. (1.232)
This yields
F = D + R. (1.233)
Thus,
dv
j
= dx
i
D
ij
+ dx
i
R
ij
= (
i
D
ij
+
i
R
ij
) ds, (1.234)
dv
T
= dx
T
D + dx
T
R =
_
T
D +
T
R
_
ds, (1.235)
dv = D dx +R
T
dx =
_
D +R
T

_
ds. (1.236)
Let
dv
(s)
j
= dx
i

(i
v
j)
=
i

(i
v
j)
ds, (1.237)
dv
(s)
T
= dx
T
D =
T
D ds, (1.238)
dv
(s)
= D dx = D ds. (1.239)
We will see this is associated with straining, both by shear and extension. We will call the
symmetric tensor
(i
v
j)
= D the strain rate or deformation tensor.
Further, let
dv
(r)
j
= dx
i

[i
v
j]
=
i

[i
v
j]
ds, (1.240)
dv
(r)
T
= dx
T
R =
T
R ds, (1.241)
dv
(r)
= R
T
dx = R
T
ds. (1.242)
We will see this is associated with rotation as a solid body, with
[i
v
j]
= R as the rotation
tensor.
1.3.7.2.1 Solid body rotation Let us examine dv
(r)
j
. First, we dene the vorticity
vector
k
as the curl of the velocity eld
k
=
kij
i
v
j
, (1.243)
= v. (1.244)
Let us now split the velocity gradient
i
v
j
into its symmetric and anti-symmetric parts and
recast the vorticity vector as
k
=
kij
(i
v
j)
. .
=0
+
kij
[i
v
j]
. (1.245)
The rst term on the right side is zero because it is the tensor inner product of an anti-
symmetric and symmetric tensor. In what remains, we see that half of the vorticity
k
is
actually the dual vector,
k
, associated with the anti-symmetric
[i
v
j]
.
k
=
kij
[i
v
j]
= v, (1.246)
k
=
1
2
k
=
1
2
kij
[i
v
j]
=
1
2
v. (1.247)
Using Eq. (1.72) to invert Eq. (1.247), we nd
[i
v
j]
=
kij
k
=
1
2
kij
k
. (1.248)
Thus we have
dv
(r)
j
= dx
i
1
2
kij
k
, (1.249)
=
kij
_
k
2
_
dx
i
, (1.250)
=
jki
_
k
2
_
dx
i
, (1.251)
=
1
2
dr and if =

2
, (1.252)
= dr
. .
Solid body rotation of one point about another
. (1.253)
By introducing the above denition for , we see this term takes on the exact form for
the dierential velocity due to solid body rotation of P
about P from classical rigid body

kinematics. Hence, we give it the same interpretation.
1.3.7.2.2 Straining Next we consider the remaining term, which we will associate with
straining. First, let us further decompose this into what will be seen to be an extensional
(es) straining and a shear straining (ss):
dv
(s)
k
= dv
(es)
k
. .
extension
+dv
(ss)
k
. .
shear
, (1.254)
dv
(s)
= dv
(es)
+ dv
(ss)
. (1.255)
1.3. KINEMATICS 57
1.3.7.2.2.1 Extensional straining Let us dene the extensional straining to be the
component of straining in the direction of dx
j
. To do this, we need to project dv
(s)
j
onto the
unit vector
j
, then point the result in the direction of that same unit vector;
dv
(es)
k
=
_
j
dv
(s)
j
_
. .
projection of straining
k
. (1.256)
Now using the denition of dv
(s)
j
, Eq. (1.237), we get
dv
(es)
k
=
_
_
_
_
j
_
(i
v
j)
ds
_
. .
=dv
(s)
j
_
_
_
_
k
, (1.257)
=
_
(i
v
j)
j
_
k
ds, (1.258)
dv
(es)
=
_
T
D
_
ds. (1.259)
Now, since
i
j
is symmetric, we can be led to a useful result. Consider the series of
operations involving the velocity gradient, in general asymmetric, and a scalar quantity, :
=
T
F , (1.260)
=
T
(D +R) , (1.261)
=
T
D +
T
R
. .
=0
, (1.262)
=
T
D . (1.263)
Thus, we can recast Eq. (1.259) as
dv
(es)
=
_
T
F
_
ds. (1.264)
1.3.7.2.2.2 Shear straining What straining that is not aligned with the axis con-
necting P and P
must then be normal to that axis, and is easily visualized to represent a

shearing between the two points. Hence the shear straining is
dv
(ss)
j
= dv
(s)
j
dv
(es)
j
, (1.265)
=
_
(j
v
i)
(i
v
k)
j
_
ds, (1.266)
=
_
(j
v
i)
(p
v
k)
ji
i
_
ds, (1.267)
=
_
(j
v
i)
(p
v
k)
k
_
ji
_
i
ds, (1.268)
dv
(ss)
=
_
D
_
T
D
_
I
_
ds. (1.269)
1.3.7.2.2.3 Principal axes of strain rate We recall from our earlier discussion that
the principal axes of stress are those axes for which the force associated with a given axis
points in the same direction as that axis. We can extend this idea to straining, but develop it
in a slightly dierent, but ultimately equivalent fashion based on notions from linear algebra.
We rst recall that most
22
arbitrary asymmetric square matrices F can be decomposed into
a diagonal form as follows:
F = P P
1
. (1.270)
Here P is a matrix of the same dimension as F which has in its columns the right eigenvectors
of F. When F is symmetric, it can be shown that its eigenvalues are guaranteed to be real
and its eigenvectors are guaranteed to be orthogonal. Further, since the eigenvectors can
always be scaled by a constant and remain eigenvectors, we can choose to scale them in such
a way that they are all normalized. In such a case in which the matrix P has orthonormal
columns, the matrix is dened as orthogonal (though orthonormal would be a more accurate
nomenclature). When P has been rendered orthogonal, we call it Q. So, when F is symmetric,
such as when F = D, the symmetric part of the velocity gradient, we also have the following
decomposition
D = Q Q
1
. (1.271)
Orthogonal matrices can be shown to have the remarkable property that their transpose is
equal to their inverse, and so we also have the even more useful
D = Q Q
T
. (1.272)
Geometrically Q is equivalent to a matrix of direction cosines; as we have seen before, its
transpose Q
T
is a rotation matrix which rotates but does not stretch a vector when it operates
on the vector.
Now let us consider the straining component of the velocity dierence; taking the sym-
metric
(i
v
j)
= D, which we further assume to be a constant for this analysis, we rewrite
Eq. (1.239) using Gibbs notation as
_
dv
(s)
_
T
= dx
T
D, (1.273)
dv
(s)
= D
T
dx, (1.274)
dv
(s)
= D dx, since D is symmetric. (1.275)
dv
(s)
= Q Q
T
dx. (1.276)
22
Some matrices, which often do not have enough linearly independent eigenvectors, cannot be diagonal-
ized; however, the argument can be extended through use of the singular value decomposition. The singular
value decomposition can also be used to eectively diagonalize asymmetric matrices; however, in that case
it can be shown there is no equivalent interpretation of the principal axes. Consequently, we will quickly
focus the discussion on symmetric matrices.
1.3. KINEMATICS 59
Now let us select what amounts to a special axes rotation via matrix multiplication by the
orthogonal matrix Q
T
:
Q
T
dv
(s)
= Q
T
Q Q
T
dx, (1.277)
Q
T
dv
(s)
= Q
1
Q Q
T
dx, (1.278)
Q
T
dv
(s)
= Q
T
dx, (1.279)
d
_
Q
T
v
(s)
_
. .
=v
(s)
= d
_
Q
T
x
_
. .
=x
since D and thus Q

T
are assumed constant. (1.280)
Now we recall from the denition of vectors that Q
T
v
(s)
= v
(s)
and Q
T
x = x
. That is
these are the representations of the vectors in a specially rotated coordinate system, so we
have
dv
(s)
= dx
. (1.281)
Now since is diagonal, we see that a perturbation in x
conned to any one of the rotated

coordinate axes induces a change in velocity which lies in the same direction as that coordi-
nate axis. For instance on the 1
axis, we have dv
(s)
1
=
11
dx
1
. That is to say that in this
specially rotated frame, all straining is extensional; there is no shear straining.
1.3.8 Expansion rate
Consider a small material region of uid, also called a particle of uid. We dene a material
region as a region enclosed by a surface across which there is no ux of mass. We shall
later see by invoking the mass conservation axiom for a non-relativistic system, that the
implication is that the mass of a material region is constant, but we need not yet consider
this. In general the volume containing this particle can increase or decrease. It is useful
to quantify the rate of this increase or decrease. Additionally, this will give a avor of the
analysis to come for the conservation axioms.
Taking the both MR and R(t) to denote the same time-dependent nite material region
in space, we must have
V
MR
=
_
R(t)
dV. (1.282)
Using Leibnizs rule, Eq. (1.178), we take the time derivative of both sides and obtain
dV
MR
dt
=
_
R(t)
t
(1) dV +
_
S(t)
n
i
v
i
dS, (1.283)
=
_
S(t)
n
i
v
i
dS, (1.284)
=
_
R(t)
i
v
i
dV by Gausss theorem, (1.285)
= (
i
v
i
)
V
MR
by the mean value theorem. (1.286)
In the analysis above, we note that the velocity of S(t), in general w
i
, has been set to the
uid velocity v
i
since we have a material region. We also recall from calculus the mean value
theorem which states that for any integral, a mean value can be dened, denoted by a , as
for example
_
b
a
f(x) dx = f
(b a). As we shrink the size of the material volume to zero,

the mean value approaches the local value, so we get
1
V
MR
dV
MR
dt
= (
i
v
i
)
, (1.287)
lim
V
MR
0
1
V
MR
dV
MR
dt
=
i
v
i
=
T
v = div v = tr D. (1.288)
Equation (1.288)describes the relative expansion rate also known as the dilation rate of a
material uid particle. A uid particle for which
i
v
i
= 0 must have a relative expansion
rate of zero, and satises conditions to be an incompressible uid.
1.3.9 Invariants of the strain rate tensor
The tensor associated with straining (also called the deformation rate tensor or strain rate
tensor)
(i
v
j)
is symmetric. Consequently, it has three real eigenvalues,
(i)

, and an orienta-
tion for which the strain rate is aligned with the eigenvectors. As with stress, there are also
three principal invariants of strain rate, namely
I
(1)

=
(i
v
i)
=
i
v
i
=
(1)

+
(2)

+
(3)

, (1.289)
I
(2)

=
1
2
(
(i
v
i)
(j
v
j)
(i
v
j)
(j
v
i)
) =
(1)

(2)

+
(2)

(3)

+
(3)

(1)

, (1.290)
I
(3)

=
ijk
(1
v
i)
(2
v
j)
(3
v
k)
=
(1)

(2)

(3)

. (1.291)
The physical interpretation for I
(1)

is obvious in that it is equal to the relative rate of volume
change for a material element,
1
V
dV
dt
. Aris discusses how I
(2)

is related to
1
V
d
2
V
dt
2
and I
(3)

is
related to
1
V
d
3
V
dt
3
.
1.3.10 Invariants of the velocity gradient tensor
For completeness, the invariants of the more general velocity gradient tensor are included.
They are
I
(1)
v
=
i
v
i
=
(1)
v
+
(2)
v
+
(3)
v
, (1.292)
I
(2)
v
=
1
2
((
i
v
i
)(
j
v
j
) (
i
v
j
)(
j
v
i
)) =
(1)
v
(2)
v
+
(2)
v
(3)
v
+
(3)
v
(1)
v
, (1.293)
=
1
2
_
(
i
v
i
)(
j
v
j
) +
[i
v
j]
[i
v
j]
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
_
, (1.294)
=
1
2
_
(
i
v
i
)(
j
v
j
) +
1
2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
_
, (1.295)
1.3. KINEMATICS 61
I
(3)
v
=
ijk
1
v
i
2
v
j
3
v
k
=
(1)
v
(2)
v
(3)
v
. (1.296)
1.3.11 Two-dimensional kinematics
Next, consider some important two dimensional cases, rst for general two-dimensional ows,
and then for specic examples.
1.3.11.1 General two-dimensional ows
For two-dimensional motion, we have the velocity vector as (v
1
, v
2
, v
3
= 0), and for the unit
tangent of the vector separating two nearby particles (
1
,
2
,
3
= 0).
1.3.11.1.1 Rotation Recalling that dx
i
=
i
ds, for rotation, we have
dv
(r)
j
=
[i
v
j]
dx
i
=
i
[i
v
j]
ds, (1.297)
dv
(r)
j
=
_
[1
v
j]
+
2
[2
v
j]
_
ds, (1.298)
dv
(r)
1
=
_
_
[1
v
1]
. .
=0
+
2
[2
v
1]
_
_
ds, (1.299)
dv
(r)
1
=
2
[2
v
1]
ds, (1.300)
dv
(r)
2
=
_
_
[1
v
2]
+
2
[2
v
2]
. .
=0
_
_
ds, (1.301)
dv
(r)
2
=
1
[1
v
2]
ds, (1.302)
rewriting in terms of the actual derivatives
dv
(r)
1
=
1
2
2
(
2
v
1
1
v
2
) ds, (1.303)
dv
(r)
2
=
1
2
1
(
1
v
2
2
v
1
) ds. (1.304)
Also for the vorticity vector, we get
k
=
ijk
i
v
j
. (1.305)
The only non-zero component is
3
, which comes to
3
=
311
..
=0
1
v
1
+
312
..
=1
1
v
2
+
321
..
=1
2
v
1
+
322
..
=0
2
v
2
, thus, (1.306)
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
. (1.307)
1.3.11.1.2 Extension
dv
(es)
k
=
k
(i
v
j)
ds, (1.308)
=
k
_
(1
v
1)
+
1
(1
v
2)
+
2
(2
v
1)
+
2
(2
v
2)
_
ds (1.309)
=
k
_
2
1
1
v
1
+
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) +
2
2
2
v
2
_
ds, so (1.310)
dv
(es)
1
=
1
_
2
1
1
v
1
+
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) +
2
2
2
v
2
_
ds, (1.311)
dv
(es)
2
=
2
_
2
1
1
v
1
+
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) +
2
2
2
v
2
_
ds. (1.312)
1.3.11.1.3 Shear
dv
(ss)
j
= dv
(s)
j
dv
(es)
j
, (1.313)
=
_
(i
v
j)
(i
v
k)
_
ds, (1.314)
dv
(ss)
1
=
_
1
v
1
+
2
_
2
v
1
+
1
v
2
2
_
1
_
2
1
1
v
1
+
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) +
2
2
2
v
2
__
ds,
dv
(ss)
2
=
_
2
v
2
+
1
_
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
2
_
2
_
2
1
1
v
1
+
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) +
2
2
2
v
2
__
ds.
1.3.11.1.4 Expansion
1
V
dV
dt
=
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
. (1.315)
1.3.11.2 Relative motion along 1 axis
Let us consider in detail the conguration shown in Figure 1.10 in which the particle sepa-
ration is along the 1 axis. Hence
1
= 1,
2
= 0, and
3
= 0.
Rotation
dv
(r)
1
= 0, (1.316)
dv
(r)
2
=
1
2
(
1
v
2
2
v
1
) ds =

3
2
ds. (1.317)
Extension
dv
(es)
1
=
1
v
1
ds, (1.318)
dv
(es)
2
= 0. (1.319)
1.3. KINEMATICS 63
x
1
x
2
P
P
v (P)
i
v (P)
i
ds
i
(P) and nearby neighbor
particle P
with velocity v
i
(P
).
Shear
dv
(ss)
1
= 0, (1.320)
dv
(ss)
2
=
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) ds =
(1
v
2)
ds. (1.321)
Expansion:
1
V
dV
dt
=
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
.
1.3.11.3 Relative motion along 2 axis
Let us consider in detail the conguration shown in Figure 1.11 in which the particle sepa-
ration is aligned with the 2 axis. Hence
1
= 0,
2
= 1, and
3
= 0.
Rotation
dv
(r)
1
=
1
2
(
2
v
1
1
v
2
) ds =
3
2
ds, (1.322)
dv
(r)
2
= 0. (1.323)
Extension
dv
(es)
1
= 0, (1.324)
dv
(es)
2
=
2
v
2
ds. (1.325)
x
1
x
2
P
P
v (P)
i
v (P)
i
ds
i
(P) and nearby neighbor
particle P
with velocity v
i
(P
).
Shear
dv
(ss)
1
=
1
2
(
2
v
1
+
1
v
2
) ds =
(1
v
2)
ds, (1.326)
dv
(ss)
2
= 0. (1.327)
Expansion
1
V
dV
dt
=
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
. (1.328)
1.3. KINEMATICS 65
x
1
x
2
v
j
Figure 1.12: Sketch of uniform ow
1.3.11.4 Uniform ow
Consider the kinematics of a uniform two-dimensional ow in which
v
1
= k
1
, v
2
= k
2
, v
3
= 0, (1.329)
as sketched in Figure 1.12.
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
,
dx
1
k
1
=
dx
2
k
2
, x
1
=
_
k
1
k
2
_
x
2
+ C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
(k
1
)
2
(k
2
) = 0.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
= 0.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
= 0.
Shear for unrotated element:
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) = 0.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= 0.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
= 0 + k
1
1
(k
1
) + k
2
2
(k
1
) = 0.
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
= 0 + k
1
1
(k
2
) + k
2
2
(k
2
) = 0.
For this very simple ow, the streamlines are straight lines, there is no rotation, no
extension, no shear, no expansion, and no acceleration.
x
1
x
2
Figure 1.13: Sketch of pure rigid body rotation.
1.3.11.5 Pure rigid body rotation
Consider the kinematics of a two-dimensional ow in which
v
1
= kx
2
, v
2
= kx
1
, v
3
= 0, (1.330)
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
,
dx
1
kx
2
=
dx
2
kx
1
, x
1
dx
1
= x
2
dx
2
, x
2
1
+ x
2
2
= C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
(kx
1
)
2
(kx
2
) = 2k.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
= 0.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
= 0.
1
2
(
1
(kx
1
) +
2
(kx
2
) = k k = 0.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= 0 + 0 = 0.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
= 0 kx
2
1
(kx
2
) + kx
1
2
(kx
2
) = k
2
x
1
.
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
= 0 kx
2
1
(kx
1
) + kx
1
2
(kx
1
) = k
2
x
2
.
In this ow, the velocity magnitude grows linearly with distance from the origin. This
is precisely how a rotating rigid body behaves. The streamlines are circles. The rotation is
positive for positive k, hence counterclockwise, there is no deformation in extension or shear,
and there is no expansion. The acceleration is pointed towards the origin.
1.3. KINEMATICS 67
x
1
x
2
v
j
Figure 1.14: Sketch of extensional ow (1-D compressible)
1.3.11.6 Pure extensional motion (a compressible ow)
v
1
= kx
1
, v
2
= 0, v
3
= 0, (1.331)
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
, v
2
dx
1
= v
1
dx
2
, 0 = kx
1
dx
2
, x
2
= C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
(0)
2
(kx
1
) = 0.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
= k.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
= 0.
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) =
1
2
(
1
(0) +
2
(kx
1
)) = 0.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= k.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
= 0 + kx
1
1
(kx
1
) + 0
2
(kx
1
) = k
2
x
1
.
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
= 0 + kx
1
1
(0) + 0
2
(0) = 0.
In this ow, the streamlines are straight lines, there is no uid rotation, there is exten-
sion (stretching) deformation along the 1-axis, but no shear deformation along this axis.
The relative expansion rate is positive for positive k, indicating a compressible ow. The
acceleration is conned to the x
1
direction.
x
2
v
j
x
1
Figure 1.15: Sketch of pure shearing ow
1.3.11.7 Pure shear straining
v
1
= kx
2
, v
2
= kx
1
, v
3
= 0, (1.332)
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
,
dx
1
kx
2
=
dx
2
kx
1
, x
1
dx
1
= x
2
dx
2
, x
2
1
= x
2
2
+ C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
(kx
1
)
2
(kx
2
) = k k = 0.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
=
1
(kx
2
) = 0.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
=
2
(kx
1
) = 0.
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) =
1
2
(
1
(kx
1
) +
2
(kx
2
)) = k.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= 0.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
= 0 + kx
2
1
(kx
2
) + kx
1
2
(kx
2
) = k
2
x
1
.
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
= 0 + kx
2
1
(kx
1
) + kx
1
2
(kx
1
) = k
2
x
2
.
In this ow, the streamlines are hyperbolas, there is no rotation, no axial extension along
the coordinate axes, positive shear deformation for an element aligned with the coordinate
axes, and no expansion. So, the pure shear deformation preserves volume. The uid is
accelerating away from the origin.
1.3. KINEMATICS 69
x
2
v
j
x
1
Figure 1.16: Sketch of Couette ow.
1.3.11.8 Couette ow: shear + rotation
v
1
= kx
2
, v
2
= 0, v
3
= 0, (1.333)
as sketched in Figure 1.16. This is known as a Couette
23
ow.
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
,
dx
1
kx
2
=
dx
2
0
, 0 = kx
2
dx
2
, x
2
= C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
(0)
2
(kx
2
) = k.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
=
1
(kx
2
) = 0.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
=
2
(0) = 0.
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) =
1
2
(
1
(0) +
2
(kx
2
)) =
k
2
.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= 0.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
= 0 + kx
2
1
(kx
2
) + 0
2
(kx
2
) = 0.
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
= 0 + kx
2
1
(0) + 0
2
(0) = 0.
Here the streamlines are straight lines, and the ow is rotational (clockwise since < 0 for
k > 0)! The constant volume rotation is combined with a constant volume shear deformation
for the element aligned with the coordinate axes. The uid is not accelerating.
23
Maurice Marie Alfred Couette, 1858-1943, French uid mechanician, student of
Joseph Valentin Boussinesq, and faculty member at Catholic University of Angers.
v
j
x
2
x
1
Figure 1.17: Sketch of ideal irrotational vortex.
1.3.11.9 Ideal point vortex: extension+shear
Consider the kinematics of a two-dimensional ow sketched in Figure 1.17.
v
1
= k
x
2
x
2
1
+ x
2
2
, v
2
= k
x
1
x
2
1
+ x
2
2
, v
3
= 0, (1.334)
Streamlines:
dx
1
v
1
=
dx
2
v
2
,
dx
1
k
x
2
x
2
1
+x
2
2
=
dx
2
k
x
1
x
2
1
+x
2
2
,
dx
1
x
2
=
dx
2
x
1
, x
2
1
+ x
2
2
= C.
Rotation:
3
=
1
v
2
2
v
1
=
1
_
k
x
1
x
2
1
+x
2
2
_
2
_
k
x
2
x
2
1
+x
2
2
_
= 0.
Extension
on 1-axis:
1
v
1
=
1
_
k
x
2
x
2
1
+x
2
2
_
= 2k
x
1
x
2
(x
2
1
+x
2
2
)
2
.
on 2-axis:
2
v
2
=
2
_
k
x
1
x
2
1
+x
2
2
_
= 2k
x
1
x
2
(x
2
1
+x
2
2
)
2
.
1
2
(
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
) = k
x
2
2
x
2
1
(x
2
1
+x
2
2
)
2
.
Expansion:
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
= 0.
Acceleration:
dv
1
dt
=
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
=
k
2
x
1
(x
2
1
+x
2
2
)
2
dv
2
dt
=
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
=
k
2
x
2
(x
2
1
+x
2
2
)
2
.
The streamlines are circles and the uid element does not rotate about its own axis! It does
rotate about the origin. It deforms by extension and shear in such a way that overall the
volume is constant.
1.3. KINEMATICS 71
1.3.12 Kinematics as a dynamical system
Let us apply some standard notions from dynamical systems theory to uid kinematics. Let
us imagine that we are given a time-independent ow eld, where the uid velocity is known
and is a function of position only. Then the motion of an individual uid particle is governed
by the following autonomous system of non-linear ordinary dierential equations:
dx
dt
= v(x(t)), x(0) = X. (1.335)
Here, the initial position of the uid particle is given by the constant vector X. The solution
of Eq. (1.335) can be expressed in general form
x = x(t; X), (1.336)
a function of time parameterized by the initial condition of the uid particle. Such a solution
is certainly a pathline, streamline, and streakline. It is also known as a trajectory in the
dynamical systems literature.
Example 1.9
As an example, we could study the following non-linear autonomous system:
dx
1
dt
= v
1
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
) = 1 + x
1
x
2
x
3
, x
1
(0) = 1, (1.337)
dx
2
dt
= v
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
) = x
1
+ x
2
2
+ x
1
x
3
2
, x
2
(0) = 1, (1.338)
dx
3
dt
= v
3
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
) = 2 x
1
+ x
2
x
3
, x
3
(0) = 4. (1.339)
Numerical solution would yield x
1
(t), x
2
(t), x
3
(t), which for this time-independent velocity eld are
the particle pathlines, streamlines, and streaklines. We could also apply the complete mathematical
theory of dynamic systems to understand the system better.
Let us analyze Eq. (1.335) in some more detail. From the chain rule, see Eq. (1.229), we
have
dv = (v
T
)
T
. .
F
T
dx, (1.340)
dv = F
T
dx, (1.341)
dv
dt
= F
T
dx
dt
, (1.342)
= F
T
v. (1.343)
Now, we seek to analyze a particular pathline. Note that the velocity vector is tangent to
the uid particle trajectory. Let us study a unit vector which happens to be tangent to the
velocity eld:
t
=
v
|v|
. (1.344)
Next, use the chain rule to examine how the unit tangent vector evolves with time:
d
t
dt
=
1
|v|
dv
dt

v
|v|
2
d|v|
dt
. (1.345)
We can scale Eq. (1.343) by |v| to get (1/|v|)dv/dt = F
T
v/|v| = F
T

t
. Thus Eq. (1.345)
can be rewritten as
d
t
dt
= F
T

t
v
|v|
2
d|v|
dt
, (1.346)
= F
T

t
t
1
|v|
d|v|
dt
. (1.347)
Next consider the following series of operations starting with Eq. (1.343):
dv
dt
= F
T
v, (1.348)
v
T
dv
dt
= v
T
F
T
v, (1.349)
d
dt
_
v
T
v
2
_
= v
T
F
T
v, (1.350)
d
dt
_
|v|
2
2
_
= v
T
F
T
v, (1.351)
|v|
d
dt
(|v|) = v
T
F
T
v, (1.352)
1
|v|
d
dt
(|v|) =
v
T
|v|
F
T
v
|v|
, (1.353)
1
|v|
d
dt
(|v|) =
T
t
F
T

t
. (1.354)
Now substitute Eq. (1.354) into Eq. (1.347) to get
d
t
dt
= F
T

t
T
t
F
T

t
_
t
. (1.355)
As an aside, take the dot product of Eq. (1.355) with
t
to get
T
t

d
t
dt
=
T
t
F
T

t
T
F
T

_
T
t

t
. .
=1
, (1.356)
=
T
t
F
T

t
T
t
F
T

t
, (1.357)
= 0. (1.358)
1.3. KINEMATICS 73
This must be an identity, because
T
t

t
= 1, and its time derivative gives
T
t
d/dt = 0.
Now recalling Eq. (1.233), and employing
T
t
R
T

t
= 0, because of the antisymmetry
of R, and D
T
= D, because of the symmetry of D, Eq. (1.355) can be rewritten as
d
t
dt
= F
T

t
T
t
D
t
_
t
. (1.359)
Let us consider how a volume stretches in a direction aligned with the velocity vector.
We rst specialize the general dierential arc length to that found along the particle path:
ds = ds. Now, recall from geometry that the square of the dierential arc length must be
ds
2
= dx
T
dx, (1.360)
where dx is also conned to the particle path. Consider now how this quantity changes with
time when we move with the particle:
d
dt
(ds)
2
=
d
dt
_
dx
T
dx
_
, (1.361)
= dx
T
d
dt
(dx) +
_
d
dt
(dx)
_
T
dx, (1.362)
= dx
T
d
_
dx
dt
_
+
_
d
_
dx
dt
__
T
dx, (1.363)
= dx
T
dv + dv
T
dx, (1.364)
= 2dx
T
dv, (1.365)
= 2dx
T
F
T
dx, (1.366)
2ds
d
dt
(ds) = 2dx
T
F
T
dx, (1.367)
1
ds
d
dt
(ds) =
dx
ds
T
F
T
dx
ds
. (1.368)
Recall now that
t
=
v
|v|
, (1.369)
=
dx
dt
ds
dt
, (1.370)
=
dx
ds
. (1.371)
So, Eq. (1.368) can be rewritten as
1
ds
d
dt
(ds) =
T
t
F
T

t
, (1.372)
d
dt
(ln ds) =
T
t
(D +R)
T

t
, (1.373)
=
T
t
D
t
, (1.374)
= D :
t
T
t
. (1.375)
Note that this relative tangential stretching rate is closely related to the result of Eq. (1.259)
for extensional strain rate. Specializing Eq. (1.259) for a particle pathline, and combining,
we can say
dv
(es)
= (
T
t
D
t
)
t
ds, (1.376)
dv
(es)
ds
= (
T
t
D
t
)
t
, (1.377)
T
t

dv
(es)
ds
= (
T
t
D
t
)
T
t

t
. .
=1
, (1.378)
=
T
t
D
t
=
1
ds
d
dt
(ds), (1.379)
=
T
t
D
t
=
1
ds
d
_
ds
dt
_
, (1.380)
=
T
t
D
t
=
d|v|
ds
, (1.381)
= D :
t
T
t
=
d|v|
ds
. (1.382)
Thus, the quantity
T
t
D
t
= D :
t
T
t
is a measure of how the magnitude of the velocity
changes with respect to arc length along the particle path.
We can gain further insight into how velocity magnitude changes by a diagonal decom-
position of D = Q Q
T
, where Q is an orthogonal rotation matrix with the normalized
eigenvectors of D in its columns, and is the diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues of D in
its diagonal. Thus
d|v|
ds
=
T
t
Q Q
T
. .
D
t
, (1.383)
= (Q
T

t
)
T
(Q
T

t
), (1.384)
(1.385)
The operation Q
T

t

s
generates a new rotated unit vector
s
= (
s1
,
s2
,
s3
)
T
. Thus
we can state
d|v|
ds
=
2
s1
1
+
2
s2
2
+
2
s3
3
, (1.386)
1 =
2
s1
+
2
s2
+
2
s3
. (1.387)
The rate of change of the velocity magnitude along a particle pathline can be understood
to be a weighted average of the eigenvalues of the deformation tensor D. In the very special
case in which
t
is the i
th
eigenvector of D, we simply get d|v|/ds =
i
, where
i
is the
corresponding eigenvalue.
1.3. KINEMATICS 75
Note now that if we extend Eq. (1.288) to dierential material volumes, we could say the
relative expansion rate is
1
dV
d
dt
(dV ) = tr D, (1.388)
d
dt
(ln dV ) = tr D. (1.389)
Now our dierential volume can be formed by
dV = dA ds, (1.390)
where dA is the cross-sectional area normal to the ow direction. Thus
ln dV = ln dA+ ln ds, (1.391)
ln dA = ln dV ln ds, (1.392)
d
dt
(ln dA) =
d
dt
(ln dV )
d
dt
(ln ds) , (1.393)
(1.394)
Substitute from Eqs. (1.374,1.389) to get the relative rate of change of the dierential area
normal to the ow direction:
d
dt
(lndA) = tr D
T
t
D
t
. (1.395)
Note this relation, while not identical, is similar to the expression for shear strain rate,
Eq. (1.269). We can also use Eq. (1.65) to rewrite Eq. (1.395) as
d
dt
(ln dA) = D : I D :
t
T
t
, (1.396)
= D :
_
I
t
T
t
_
. (1.397)
Now the matrix I
t
T
t
has some surprising properties. It is singular and has rank two.
Because it is symmetric, it has a set of three orthogonal eigenvectors which can be normalized
to form an orthonormal set. Its three eigenvalues are 1, 1, and 0. Remarkably, the eigenvector
associated with the zero eigenvalue must be parallel to and can be selected as
t
, the unit
tangent to the curve. Thus the other two eigenvectors can be thought of as unit normals
to the curve, which we label
n1
and
n2
. Note that these eigenvectors are not unique;
however, a set can always be found. We can summarize the decomposition in the following
steps:
I
t
T
t
= Q Q
T
, (1.398)
=
_
_
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n1

n2

t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
_
_
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
_
_
_
_

T
n1

T
n2

T
t

_
_
, (1.399)
=
n1
T
n1
+
n2
T
n2
. (1.400)
Note that the two unit normals are orthogonal to each other,
T
n1

n2
= 0. Thus, we have
d
dt
(ln dA) = D :
_
n1
T
n1
+
n2
T
n2
_
, (1.401)
= D :
n1
T
n1
+D :
n2
T
n2
, (1.402)
=
T
n1
D
n1
+
T
n2
D
n2
. (1.403)
Comparing to Eq. (1.374) which has one mode associated with
t
available for stretching of
the one-dimensional arc length in the streamwise direction, there are two modes associated
with
n1
,
n2
available for stretching the two-dimensional area.
Motivated by standard results from dierential geometry, we can make special choices,
n1
=
np
,
n2
=
nb
, where
np
is the so-called principal normal unit vector and
nb
is
the so-called bi-normal unit vector. The following results are described in more detail in
many sources, e.g. Sen and Powers
24
We have the so-called Frenet-Serret
25
relations:
d
t
ds
=
np
, (1.404)
d
np
ds
=
t
nb
, (1.405)
d
nb
ds
=
np
. (1.406)
Here is the so-called curvature, of the curve and is the so-called torsion of the curve.
One can, with eort show that and are given by
=
_
d
2
x
dt
2
dx
dt
_
dx
dt
T
d
2
x
dt
2
_
2
dx
dt
3
, (1.407)
=
_
dx
dt

d
2
x
dt
2
_
T
d
3
x
dt
3
d
2
x
dt
2
dx
dt
_
dx
dt
T
d
2
x
dt
2
_
2
(1.408)
Note and are expressed here as functions of time. This certainly the case for a particle
moving along a path in time. But just as the intrinsic curvature of a mountain road is
independent of the speed of the vehicle traveling on the road, despite the traveling vehicle
experiencing a time-dependency of curvature, the curvature and torsion can be considered
more fundamentally to be functions of position only, given that the velocity eld is known
as a function of position. Analysis reveals in fact that
=
_
(v
T
F F
T
v) (v
T
v) (v
T
F
T
v)
2
(v
T
v)
3/2
(1.409)
24
Sen, M., and Powers, J. M., 2012, Lecture Notes in Mathematical Methods, Chapter 6.
25
Jean Frederic Frenet, 1816-1900, and Joseph Alfred Serret, 1819-1885, French mathematicians.
1.4. CONSERVATION AXIOMS 77
One could also develop an expression for torsion which is explicitly dependent on position.
The expression is complicated and requires the use of third order tensors to capture the
higher order spatial variations.
We can also use this intrinsic orthonormal basis to get
d
dt
(lndA) = D :
_
np
T
np
+
nb
T
nb
_
, (1.410)
= D :
np
T
np
+D :
nb
T
nb
, (1.411)
=
T
np
D
np
+
T
nb
D
nb
. (1.412)
1.4 Conservation axioms
A fundamental goal of this section is to take the verbal notions which embody the basic
axioms of non-relativistic continuum mechanics into usable mathematical expressions. First,
we must list those axioms. The axioms themselves are simply principles which have been
observed to have wide validity as long as the particle velocity is small relative to the speed
of light and length scales are suciently large to contain many molecules. Many of these
axioms can be applied to molecules as well. The axioms cannot be proven. They are simply
statements which have been useful in describing the universe.
A summary of the axioms in words is as follows
Mass conservation principle: The time rate of change of mass of a material region is
zero.
Linear momenta principle: The time rate of change of the linear momenta of a material
region is equal to the sum of forces acting on the region. This is Eulers generalization
of Newtons second law of motion.
Angular momenta principle: The time rate of change of the angular momenta of a
material region is equal to the sum of the torques acting on the region. This was rst
formulated by Euler.
Energy conservation principle: The time rate of change of energy within a material
region is equal to the rate that energy is received by heat and work interactions. This
is the rst law of thermodynamics.
Entropy inequality: The time rate of change of entropy within a material region is
greater than or equal to the ratio of the rate of heat transferred to the region and the
absolute temperature of the region. This is the second law of thermodynamics.
Some secondary concepts related to these axioms are as follows
The local stress on one side of a surface is identically opposite that stress on the
opposite side.
dV
dS
w = v
n
i
i
i
Figure 1.18: Sketch of nite material region MR, innitesimal mass element dV , and
innitesimal surface element dS with unit normal n
i
, and general velocity w
i
equal to uid
velocity v
i
.
Stress can be separated into thermodynamic and viscous stress.
Forces can be separated into surface and body forces.
In the absence of body couples, the angular momenta principle reduces to a nearly
trivial statement.
The energy equation can be separated into mechanical and thermal components.
Next we shall systematically convert these words above into mathematical form.
1.4.1 Mass
The mass conservation axiom is simple to state mathematically. It is
d
dt
m
MR(t)
= 0. (1.413)
Here MR(t) stands for a material region which can evolve in time, and m
MR(t)
is the mass
in the material region. A relevant material region is sketched in Figure 1.18. We can dene
the mass of the material region based upon the local value of density:
m
MR(t)
=
_
MR(t)
dV. (1.414)
So, the mass conservation axiom is
d
dt
_
MR(t)
dV = 0. (1.415)
Recalling Leibnizs rule, Eq. (1.178),
d
dt
_
R(t)
[ ]dV =
_
R(t)
t
[ ]dV +
_
S(t)
n
i
w
i
[ ]dS, we take
the arbitrary velocity w
i
= v
i
as we are considering a material region so we get
d
dt
_
MR(t)
dV =
_
MR(t)
t
dV +
_
MS(t)
n
i
v
i
dS = 0. (1.416)
Now we invoke Gausss theorem, Eq. (1.167)
_
R(t)

i
[ ]dV =
_
S(t)
n
i
[ ]dS, to convert a surface
integral to a volume integral to get the mass conservation axiom to read as
_
MR(t)
t
dV +
_
MR(t)
i
(v
i
)dV = 0, (1.417)
_
MR(t)
_
t
+
i
(v
i
)
_
dV = 0. (1.418)
Now, in an important step, we realize that the only way for this integral, which has absolutely
arbitrary limits of integration, to always be zero, is for the integrand itself to always be zero.
Hence, we have
t
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.419)
which we will write in Cartesian index, Gibbs, and full notation in what we call conservative
or divergence form as
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.420)
o
+
T
(v) = 0, (1.421)
o
+
1
(v
1
) +
2
(v
2
) +
3
(v
3
) = 0. (1.422)
There are several alternative forms for this axiom. Using the product rule, we can say also
o
+ v
i
. .
material derivative of density
+
i
v
i
= 0, (1.423)
or, writing in what is called the non-conservative form,
d
dt
+
i
v
i
= 0, (1.424)
d
dt
+
T
v = 0, (1.425)
(
o
+ v
1
1
+ v
2
2
+ v
3
3
) + (
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
+
3
v
3
) = 0. (1.426)
So, we can also say
1
d
dt
..
relative rate of density increase
=
i
v
i
..
relative rate of particle volume expansion
. (1.427)
Thus the relative rate of density increase of a uid particle is the negative of its relative rate
of expansion, as expected. So, we also have
1
d
dt
=
1
V
MR
dV
MR
dt
, (1.428)
dV
MR
dt
+ V
MR
d
dt
= 0, (1.429)
d
dt
(V
MR
) = 0, (1.430)
d
dt
(m
MR
) = 0. (1.431)
We note that in a relativistic system, in which mass-energy is conserved, but not mass, that
we can have a material region, that is a region bounded by a surface across which there is no
ux of mass, for which the mass can indeed change, thus violating our non-relativistic mass
conservation axiom.
1.4.2 Linear momenta
1.4.2.1 Statement of the principle
The linear momenta conservation axiom is simple to state mathematically. It is
d
dt
_
MR(t)
v
i
dV
. .
rate of change of linear momenta
=
_
MR(t)
f
i
dV
. .
body forces
+
_
MS(t)
t
i
dS
. .
surface forces
. (1.432)
Again MR(t) stands for a material region which can evolve in time. A relevant material
region is sketched in Figure 1.19. The term f
i
represents a body force per unit mass. An
example of such a force would be the gravitational force acting on a body, which when scaled
by mass, yields g
i
. The term t
i
is a traction, which is a vector representing force per unit
area. A major challenge of this section will be to express the traction in terms of what is
known as the stress tensor.
Consider rst the left hand side, LHS, of the linear momenta principle
LHS =
_
MR(t)
o
(v
i
)dV +
_
MS(t)
n
j
v
i
v
j
dS, from Leibniz, (1.433)
=
_
MR(t)
(
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
)) dV, from Gauss. (1.434)
So, the linear momenta principle is
_
MR(t)
(
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
)) dV =
_
MR(t)
f
i
dV +
_
MS(t)
t
i
dS. (1.435)
These are all expressed in terms of volume integrals except for the term involving surface
forces.
dS
w = v
n
i
i
i
v dV
i
f dV
i
t
i
Figure 1.19: Sketch of nite material region MR, innitesimal linear momenta element
v
i
dV , innitesimal body force element f
i
dV , and innitesimal surface element dS with
unit normal n
i
, surface traction t
i
and general velocity w
i
equal to uid velocity v
i
.
1.4.2.2 Surface forces
The surface force per unit area is a vector we call the traction t
j
. It has the units of stress,
but it is not formally a stress, which is a tensor. The traction is a function of both position
x
i
and surface orientation n
k
: t
j
= t
j
(x
i
, n
k
).
We intend to demonstrate the following: The traction can be stated in terms of a stress
tensor T
ij
as written below:
t
j
= n
i
T
ij
,
t
T
= n
T
T,
t = T
T
n. (1.436)
The following excursions are necessary to show this.
Show force on one side of surface equal and opposite to that on the opposite side
Let us apply the principle of linear momenta to the material region is sketched in Figure
1.20. Here we indicate the dependency of the traction on orientation by notation such
as t
i
_
n
II
i
_
. This does not indicate multiplication, nor that i is a dummy index here. In
Figure 1.20, the thin pillbox has width l, circumference s, and a surface area for the
circular region of S. Surface I is a circular region; surface II is the opposite circular
region, and surface III is the cylindrical side.
We apply the mean value theorem to the linear momenta principle for this region and
get
(
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
))
(S)(l) =
(f
i
)
(S)(l) + t
i
(n
I
i
)S + t
i
(n
II
i
)S + t
i
(n
III
i
)s(l). (1.437)
l
n
t (n )
t (n )
t (n )
S
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
n
i
II
II
III
n
III
i
Figure 1.20: Sketch of pillbox element for stress analysis.
Now we let l 0, holding for now s and S xed to obtain
0 =
_
t
i
(n
I
i
) + t
i
(n
II
i
)
_
S (1.438)
Now letting S 0, so that the mean value approaches the local value, and taking
n
I
i
= n
II
i
n
i
, we get a useful result
t
i
(n
i
) = t
i
(n
i
). (1.439)
At an innitesimal length scale, the traction on one side of a surface is equal an opposite
that on the other. That is, there is a local force balance. This applies even if there is
velocity and acceleration of the material on a macroscale. On the microscale, surface
forces dominate inertia and body forces. This is a useful general principle to remember.
It the fundamental reason why microorganisms have very dierent propulsion systems
that macro-organisms: they are ghting dierent forces.
Study stress on arbitrary plane and relate to stress on coordinate planes
Now let us consider a rectangular parallelepiped aligned with the Cartesian axes which
has been sliced at an oblique angle to form a tetrahedron. We will apply the linear
momenta principle to this geometry and make a statement about the existence of a
stress tensor. The described material region is sketched in Figure 1.21. Let L be a
characteristic length scale of the tetrahedron. Also let four unit normals n
j
exist, one
for each surface. They will be n
1
, n
2
, n
3
for the surfaces associated with each
coordinate direction. They are negative because the outer normal points opposite to
the direction of the axes. Let n
i
be the normal associated with the oblique face. Let
S denote the surface area of each face.
x
x
x
1
2
3
t (-n ) S
i 2 2
i 1
t (-n ) S
1
t (-n ) S
i 3 3
t (n ) S
i i
-n
1
-n
2
-n
3
n
i
Figure 1.21: Sketch of tetrahedral element for stress analysis on an arbitrary plane.
Now the volume of the tetrahedron must be of order L
3
and the surface area of order
L
2
. Thus applying the mean value theorem to the linear momenta principle, we obtain
the form
(inertia) (L)
3
= (body forces) (L)
3
+ (surface forces) (L)
2
. (1.440)
As before, for small volumes, L 0, the linear momenta principle reduces to
surface forces = 0. (1.441)

Applying this to the conguration of Figure 1.21, we get
0 = t
i
(n
i
)S + t
i
(n
1
)S
1
+ t
i
(n
2
)S
2
+ t
i
(n
3
)S
3
. (1.442)
But we know that t
j
(n
j
) = t
j
(n
j
), so
t
i
(n
i
)S = t
i
(n
1
)S
1
+ t
i
(n
2
)S
2
+ t
i
(n
3
)S
3
. (1.443)
Now it is not a dicult geometry problem to show that n
i
S = S
i
, so we get
t
i
(n
i
)S = n
1
t
i
(n
1
)S + n
2
t
i
(n
2
)S + n
3
t
i
(n
3
)S, (1.444)
t
i
(n
i
) = n
1
t
i
(n
1
) + n
2
t
i
(n
2
) + n
3
t
i
(n
3
). (1.445)
Now we can consider terms like t
i
is obviously a vector, and the indicator, for example
(n
1
), tells us with which surface the vector is associated. This is precisely what a tensor
does, and in fact we can say
t
i
(n
i
) = n
1
T
1i
+ n
2
T
2i
+ n
3
T
3i
. (1.446)
In shorthand, we can say the same thing with
t
i
= n
j
T
ji
, or equivalently t
j
= n
i
T
ij
, QED. (1.447)
Here T
ij
is the component of stress in the j direction associated with the surface whose
normal is in the i direction.
Consider pressure and the viscous stress tensor
Pressure is a familiar concept from thermodynamics and uid statics. It is often
tempting and sometimes correct to think of the pressure as the force per unit area
normal to a surface and the force tangential to a surface being somehow related to
frictional forces. We shall see that in general, this view is too simplistic.
First recall from thermodynamics that what we will call p, the thermodynamic pressure,
is for a simple compressible substance a function of at most two intensive thermody-
namic variables, say p = f(, e), where e is the specic internal energy. Also recall
that the thermodynamic pressure must be a normal stress, as thermodynamics con-
siders formally only materials at rest, and viscous stresses are associated with moving
uids.
To distinguish between thermodynamic stresses and other stresses, let us dene the
viscous stress tensor
ij
as follows
ij
= T
ij
+ p
ij
. (1.448)
Recall that T
ij
is the total stress tensor. We obviously also have
T
ij
= p
ij
+
ij
. (1.449)
Note with this denition that pressure is positive in compression, while T
ij
and
ij
are
positive in tension. Let us also dene the mechanical pressure, p
(m)
, as the negative of
the average normal surface stress
p
(m)

1
3
T
ii
=
1
3
(T
11
+ T
22
+ T
33
). (1.450)
The often invoked Stokes assumption, which remains a subject of widespread mis-
understanding 150 years after it was rst made, is often adopted for lack of a good
alternative in answer to a question which will be addressed later in this chapter. It
asserts that the thermodynamic pressure is equal to the mechanical pressure:
p = p
(m)
=
1
3
T
ii
. (1.451)
Presumably a pressure measuring device in a moving ow eld would actually measure
the mechanical pressure, and not necessarily the thermodynamic pressure, so it is im-
portant to have this issue claried for proper reconciliation of theory and measurement.
It will be seen that Stokes assumption gives some minor aesthetic pleasure in certain
limits, but it is not well-established, and is more a convenience than a requirement for
most materials. It is the case that various incarnations of more fundamental kinetic
theory under the assumption of a dilute gas composed of inert hard spheres give rise
to the conclusion that Stokes assumption is valid. At moderate densities, these hard
sphere kinetic theory models predict that Stokes assumption is invalid. However, none
of the common the kinetic theory models is able to predict results from experiments,
which nevertheless also give indication, albeit indirect, that Stokes assumption is in-
valid. Kinetic theories and experiments which consider polyatomic molecules, which
can suer vibrational and rotational eects as well, show further deviation from Stokes
assumption. It is often plausibly argued that these so-called non-equilibrium eects,
that is molecular vibration and rotation, which are only important in high speed ow
applications in which the ow velocity is on the order of the uid sound speed, are the
mechanisms which cause Stokes assumption to be violated. Because they only are im-
portant in high speed applications, they are dicult to measure, though measurement
of the decay of acoustic waves has provided some data. For liquids, there is little to no
theory, and the limited data indicates that Stokes assumption is invalid.
Now contracting Eq. (1.449), we get
T
ii
= p
ii
+
ii
. (1.452)
Using the fact that
ii
= 3 and inserting Eq. (1.451) in Eq. (1.452), we nd for a uid
that obeys Stokes assumption that
T
ii
=
1
3
T
ii
(3) +
ii
, (1.453)
0 =
ii
. (1.454)
That is to say, the trace of the viscous stress tensor is zero. Moreover, for a uid which
obeys Stokes assumption we can interpret the viscous stress as the deviation from the
mean stress; that is, the viscous stress is a deviatoric stress:
T
ij
..
total stress
=
1
3
T
kk
ij
. .
mean stress
+
ij
..
deviatoric stress
, (valid only if Stokes assumption holds)
(1.455)
If Stokes assumption does not hold, then a portion of
ij
will also contribute to the
mean stress; that is, the viscous stress is not then entirely deviatoric.
Finally, let us note what the traction vector is when the uid is static. For a static
uid, there is no viscous stress, so
ij
= 0, and we have
T
ij
= p
ij
, static uid. (1.456)
We get the traction vector on any surface with normal n
i
by
t
j
= n
i
T
ij
= pn
i
ij
= pn
j
. (1.457)
Changing indices, we see t
i
= pn
i
, that is the traction vector must be oriented in the
same direction as the surface normal; all stresses are normal to any arbitrarily oriented
surface.
1.4.2.3 Final form of linear momenta equation
We are now prepared to write the linear momenta equation in nal form. Substituting
our expression for the traction vector, Eq. (1.447) into the linear momenta expression, Eq.
(1.435), we get
_
MR(t)
(
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
))dV =
_
MR(t)
f
i
dV +
_
MS(t)
n
j
T
ji
dS. (1.458)
Using Gausss theorem, Eq. (1.167), to convert the surface integral into a volume integral,
and combining all under one integral sign, we get
_
MR(t)
(
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) f
i
j
T
ji
)dV = 0. (1.459)
Making the same argument as before regarding arbitrary material volumes, this must then
require that the integrand be zero (we actually must require all variables be continuous to
make this work), so we obtain
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) f
i
j
T
ji
= 0. (1.460)
Using then T
ij
= p
ij
+
ij
, we get in Cartesian index, Gibbs
26
, and full notation
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) = f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.461)
t
(v) +
_
T
(vv
T
)
_
T
= f p +
_
T

_
T
, (1.462)
o
(v
1
) +
1
(v
1
v
1
) +
2
(v
2
v
1
) +
3
(v
3
v
1
) = f
1
1
p +
1
11
+
2
21
+
3
31
, (1.463)
o
(v
2
) +
1
(v
1
v
2
) +
2
(v
2
v
2
) +
3
(v
3
v
2
) = f
2
2
p +
1
12
+
2
22
+
3
32
, (1.464)
o
(v
3
) +
1
(v
1
v
3
) +
2
(v
2
v
3
) +
3
(v
3
v
3
) = f
3
3
p +
1
13
+
2
23
+
3
33
. (1.465)
The form above is known as the linear momenta principle cast in conservative or divergence
form. It is the rst choice of forms for many numerical simulations, as discretizations of this
form of the equation naturally preserve the correct values of global linear momenta, up to
roundo error.
26
Here the transpose notation is particularly cumbersome and unfamiliar, though necessary for full con-
sistency. One will more commonly see this equation written simply as

t
(v) + (vv) = f p + .
However, there is a reduced, non-conservative form which makes some analysis and phys-
ical interpretation easier. Let us use the product rule to expand the linear momenta prin-
ciple, then rearrange it, and use mass conservation and the denition of material derivative
to rewrite the expression:
o
v
i
+ v
i
o
+ v
i
j
(v
j
) + v
j
j
v
i
= f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.466)
(
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
) + v
i
(
o
+
j
(v
j
)
. .
=0 by mass conservation
) = f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.467)
(
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
)
. .
=
dv
i
dt
= f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.468)
dv
i
dt
= f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.469)
dv
dt
= f p +
_
T

_
T
, (1.470)
(
o
v
1
+ v
1
1
v
1
+ v
2
2
v
1
+ v
3
3
v
1
) = f
1
1
p +
1
11
+
2
21
+
3
31
, (1.471)
(
o
v
2
+ v
1
1
v
2
+ v
2
2
v
2
+ v
3
3
v
2
) = f
2
2
p +
1
12
+
2
22
+
3
32
, (1.472)
(
o
v
3
+ v
1
1
v
3
+ v
2
2
v
3
+ v
3
3
v
3
) = f
3
3
p +
1
13
+
2
23
+
3
33
. (1.473)
So, we see that particles accelerate due to body forces and unbalanced surface forces. If the
surface forces are non-zero but uniform, they will have no gradient or divergence, and hence
not contribute to accelerating a particle.
1.4.3 Angular momenta
It is often easy to overlook the angular momenta principle, and its consequence is so simple
that, it is often just asserted without proof. In fact in classical rigid body mechanics, it
is redundant with the linear momenta principle. It is, however, an independent axiom for
continuous deformable media.
Let us rst recall some notions from classical rigid body mechanics, while referring to the
sketch of Figure 1.22. We have the angular momenta vector L for the particle of Figure 1.22
L = r (mv). (1.474)
Any force F which acts on m with lever arm r induces a torque

T which is
T = r F. (1.475)
Now let us apply these notions for an innitesimal uid particle with dierential mass dV .
Angular momenta = r ( dV )v =
ijk
r
j
v
k
dV, (1.476)
Torque of body force = r f( dV ) =
ijk
r
j
f
k
dV, (1.477)
Torque of surface force = r t dS =
ijk
r
j
t
k
dS,
= r (n
T
T) dS =
ijk
r
j
n
p
T
pk
dS,(1.478)
Angular momenta from surface couples = n
T
H dS = n
k
H
ki
dS. (1.479)
v
m
r
O
Figure 1.22: Sketch of particle of mass m velocity v rotating about an axis centered at point
O, with radial distance vector r.
Now the principle, which in words says the time rate of change of angular momenta of a
material region is equal to the sum of external couples (or torques) on the system becomes
mathematically,
d
dt
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
v
k
dV
. .
Apply Leibniz then Gauss
=
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
f
k
dV +
_
MS(t)
(
ijk
r
j
n
p
T
pk
+ n
k
H
ki
) dS
. .
apply Gauss
. (1.480)
We apply Leibnizs and Gausss theorem to the indicated terms and let the volume of the
material region shrink to zero now. First with Leibniz, we get
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
v
k
dV +
_
MS(t)
ijk
r
j
v
k
n
p
v
p
dS =
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
f
k
dV +
_
MS(t)
(
ijk
r
j
n
p
T
pk
+ n
k
H
ki
) dS. (1.481)
Next with Gauss we get
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
v
k
dV +
_
MR(t)
ijk
p
(r
j
v
k
v
p
)dV =
_
MR(t)
ijk
r
j
f
k
dV +
_
MR(t)
ijk
p
(r
j
T
pk
)dV +
_
MR(t)
k
H
ki
dV. (1.482)
As the region is arbitrary, the integrand formed by placing all terms under the same integral
must be zero, which yields
ijk
(
o
(r
j
v
k
) +
p
(r
j
v
p
v
k
) r
j
f
k
p
(r
j
T
pk
)) =
k
H
ki
. (1.483)
Using the product rule to expand some of the derivatives, we get
ijk
_
_
_
_
r
j
o
(v
k
) + v
k

o
r
j
..
= 0
+r
j
p
(v
p
v
k
) + v
p
v
k

p
r
j
..
pr
r
j
f
k
r
j
p
T
pk
T
pk

p
r
j
..
pr
_
_
_
_
=
k
H
ki
.
(1.484)
Applying the simplications indicated above and rearranging, we get
ijk
r
j
(
o
(v
k
) +
p
(v
p
v
k
) f
k
p
T
pk
)
. .
=0 by linear momenta
=
k
H
ki
ijk
v
j
v
k
+
ijk
T
jk
. (1.485)
So, we can say,
k
H
ki
=
ijk
(v
j
v
k
T
jk
) =
ijk
..
antisym.
_
_
_
v
j
v
k
. .
sym.
T
(jk)
..
sym.
T
[jk]
..
antisym.
_
_
_
, (1.486)
=
ijk
T
[jk]
. (1.487)
We have utilized the fact that the tensor inner product of any anti-symmetric tensor with
any symmetric tensor must be zero. Now, if we have the case where there are no externally
imposed angular momenta elds, such as could be the case when electromagnetic forces are
important, we have the common condition of H
ki
= 0, and the angular momenta principle
reduces to the simple statement that
T
[ij]
= 0. (1.488)
That is, the anti-symmetric part of the stress tensor must be zero. Hence, the stress tensor,
absent any body or surface couples, must be symmetric, and we get in Cartesian index and
Gibbs notation:
T
ij
= T
ji
, (1.489)
T = T
T
. (1.490)
1.4.4 Energy
We recall the rst law of thermodynamics, which states the time rate of change of a material
regions internal and kinetic energy is equal to the rate of heat transferred to the material
region less the rate of work done by the material region. Mathematically, this is stated as
dE
dt
=
dQ
dt

dW
dt
. (1.491)
In this case (though this is not uniformly enforced in these notes), the upper case letters
denote extensive thermodynamic properties. For example, E is total energy, inclusive of
internal and kinetic, with SI units of J. We could have included potential energy in E, but
will instead absorb it into the work term W. Let us consider each term in the rst law of
thermodynamics in detail and then write the equation in nal form.
1.4.4.1 Total energy term
For a uid particle, the dierential amount of total energy is
dE =
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
dV, (1.492)
= dV
..
mass
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
. .
specic internal +kinetic energy
. (1.493)
1.4.4.2 Work term
Recall that work is done when a force acts through a distance, and a work rate arises when
a force acts through a distance at a particular rate in time (hence, a velocity is involved).
Recall also that it is the dot product (inner product) of the force vector with the position or
velocity that gives the true work or work rate. In shorthand, we could say
dW = dx
T
F, (1.494)
dW
dt
=
dx
T
dt
F = v
T
F. (1.495)
Here W has the SI units of J, and F has the SI units of N. We contrast this with our
expression for body force per unit mass f, which has SI units of N/kg = m/s
2
. Now for the
materials we consider, we must describe work done by two types of forces: 1) body, and 2)
surface.
Work rate done by a body force
Work rate done by force on uid = (dV )(f
i
)v
i
, (1.496)
Work rate done by uid = v
i
f
i
dV. (1.497)
Work rate done by a surface force
Work rate done by force on uid = (t
i
dS)v
i
= [(n
j
T
ji
)dS]v
i
, (1.498)
Work rate done by uid = n
j
T
ji
v
i
dS. (1.499)
1.4.4.3 Heat transfer term
The only thing confusing about the heat transfer rate is the sign convention. We recall that
heat transfer to a body is associated with an increase in that bodys energy. Now following
the scenario sketched in the material region of Figure 1.23, we dene the heat ux vector q
i
as a vector which points in the direction of thermal energy ow which has units of energy
per area per time; in SI this would be W/m
2
. So, we have
heat transfer rate from body through dS = n
i
q
i
dS, (1.500)
heat transfer rate to body through dS = n
i
q
i
dS. (1.501)
dV
dS
n
i
i
q
Figure 1.23: Sketch of nite material region MR, innitesimal mass element dV , and
innitesimal surface element dS with unit normal n
i
, and heat ux vector q
i
.
1.4.4.4 Conservative form of the energy equation
Putting the words of the rst law into equation form, we get
d
dt
_
MR(t)
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
dV =
_
MS(t)
n
i
q
i
dS +
_
MS(t)
n
i
T
ij
v
j
dS +
_
MR(t)
f
i
v
i
dS. (1.502)
Skipping the details of an identical application of Leibnizs and Gausss theorems, and shrink-
ing the volume to approach zero, we obtain the dierential equation of energy in conservative
or divergence form (in rst Cartesian index then Gibbs notation):
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
. .
rate of change of total energy
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
. .
advection of total energy
=

i
q
i
..
diusive heat ux
+
i
(T
ij
v
j
)
. .
surface force work rate
+ v
i
f
i
..
body force work rate
, (1.503)
t
_
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
+
T
_
v
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
=
T
q +
T
(T v) + v
T
f. (1.504)
Note that this is a scalar equation as there are no free indices.
We can segregate the work done by the surface forces into that done by pressure forces
and that done by viscous forces by rewriting this in terms of p and
ij
as follows
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
=
i
q
i
+
i
(pv
i
) +
i
(
ij
v
j
) + v
i
f
i
, (1.505)
t
_
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
+
T
_
v
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
=
T
q
T
(pv) +
T
( v) + v
T
f. (1.506)
1.4.4.5 Secondary forms of the energy equation
While the energy equation just derived is perfectly valid for all continuous materials, it
is common to see other forms. They will be described here. The rst, the mechanical
energy equation, actually has no foundation in the rst law of thermodynamics; instead, it
is entirely a consequence of the linear momenta principle. It is the type of energy that is
often considered in classical Newtonian particle mechanics, a world in which energy is either
potential or kinetic but not thermal. We include it here because it is closely related to other
forms of energy.
1.4.4.5.1 Mechanical energy equation The mechanical energy equation, a pure con-
sequence of the linear momenta principle, is obtained by taking the dot product (inner
product) of the velocity vector with the linear momenta principle:
v
T
linear momenta.
In detail, we get
v
j
(
o
v
j
+ v
i
i
v
j
) = v
j
f
j
v
j
j
p + (
i
ij
)v
j
, (1.507)
o
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
+ v
i
i
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
= v
j
f
j
v
j
j
p + (
i
ij
)v
j
, (1.508)
v
j
v
j
2
mass :
v
j
v
j
2

o
+
v
j
v
j
2

i
(v
i
) = 0. (1.509)
We add Eqs. (1.508) and (1.509) and use the product rule to get
o
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
+
i
_
v
i
v
j
v
j
2
_
= v
j
f
j
v
j
j
p + (
i
ij
)v
j
. (1.510)
t
_
v
T
v
2
_
+
T
_
v
v
T
v
2
_
= v
T
f v
T
p +
_
T

_
v. (1.511)
The term v
j
v
j
/2 represents the volume averaged kinetic energy, with SI units J/m
3
. Note
that the mechanical energy equation, Eq. (1.510), predicts the kinetic energy increases due
to three eects:
uid motion in the direction of a body force,
uid motion in the direction of decreasing pressure, or
uid motion in the direction of increasing viscous stress.
Note that body forces themselves aect mechanical energy, while it is imbalances in surface
forces which aect mechanical energy.
1.4.4.5.2 Thermal energy equation If we take the conservative form of the energy
equation (1.505) and subtract from it the mechanical energy equation (1.510), we get an
equation for the evolution of thermal energy:
o
(e) +
i
(v
i
e) =
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.512)
t
(e) +
T
(ve) =
T
q p
T
v + : v
T
. (1.513)
Here e is the volume averaged internal energy with SI units J/m
3
. Note that the thermal
energy equation (1.512) predicts thermal energy (or internal energy) increases due to
negative gradients in heat ux (more heat enters than leaves),
pressure force accompanied by a mean negative volumetric deformation (that is, a
uniform compression; note that
i
v
i
is the relative expansion rate), or
viscous force associated with a deformation
27
(well worry about the sign later).
Note that in contrast to mechanical energy, thermal energy changes do not require surface
force imbalances; instead they require kinematic deformation. Moreover, body forces have
no inuence on thermal energy. The work done by a body force is partitioned entirely to the
mechanical energy of a body.
1.4.4.5.3 Non-conservative energy equation We can obtain the commonly used non-
conservative form of the energy equation, also known as the energy equation following a uid
particle, by the following operations. First expand the thermal energy equation (1.512):
o
e + e
o
+ v
i
i
e + e
i
(v
i
) =
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.514)
Then regroup and notice terms common from the mass conservation equation:
(
o
e + v
i
i
e)
. .
de
dt
+e (
o
+
i
(v
i
))
. .
=0 by mass
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.515)
so we get
de
dt
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.516)
de
dt
=
T
q p
T
v + : v
T
. (1.517)
27
For a general uid, this includes a mean volumetric deformation as well as a deviatoric deformation. If
the uid satises Stokes assumption, it is only the deviatoric deformation that induces a change in internal
energy in the presence of viscous stress.
We can get an equation which is reminiscent of elementary thermodynamics, valid for
small volumes V by multiplying Eq. (1.516) by V and using Eq. (1.288 to replace
i
v
i
by its
known value in terms of the relative expansion rate to obtain
V
de
dt
= V
i
q
i
p
dV
dt
+ V
ij
i
v
j
. (1.518)
The only term not usually found in elementary thermodynamics texts is the third on the
right hand side, which is a viscous work term.
1.4.4.5.4 Energy equation in terms of enthalpy Often the energy equation is cast
in terms of enthalpy. This is generally valid, but especially useful in constant pressure
environments. Recall from elementary thermodynamics the specic enthalpy h is dened as
h = e +
p
. (1.519)
Now starting with the energy equation following a particle (1.516), we can use one form
of the mass equation, Eq. (1.427), to eliminate the relative expansion rate
i
v
i
in favor of
density derivatives to get
de
dt
=
i
q
i
+
p
d
dt
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.520)
Rearranging, we get
_
de
dt

p
2
d
dt
_
=
i
q
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.521)
Now dierentiating Eq. (1.519), we nd
dh = de
p
2
d +
1
dp, (1.522)
dh
dt
=
de
dt

p
2
d
dt
+
1
dp
dt
, (1.523)
de
dt

p
2
d
dt
=
dh
dt

1
dp
dt
, (1.524)
de
dt

p
d
dt
=
dh
dt

dp
dt
. (1.525)
So, using Eq. (1.525) to eliminate de/dt in Eq. (1.521) in favor of dh/dt, the energy equation
in terms of enthalpy becomes
dh
dt
=
dp
dt

i
q
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.526)
dh
dt
=
dp
dt

T
q + : v
T
. (1.527)
1.4.4.5.5 Energy equation in terms of entropy By using standard relations from
thermodynamics, we can write the energy equation in terms of entropy. It is important to
note that this is just an algebraic substitution. The physical principle which this equation
will represent is still energy conservation.
Recall the Gibbs equation from thermodynamics, which serves to dene entropy s:
Tds = de + pd v. (1.528)
Here T is the absolute temperature, and v is the specic volume, v = V/m = 1/. In terms
of , the Gibbs equation is
Tds = de
p
2
d. (1.529)
Taking the material derivative of Eq. (1.529) , which is operationally equivalent to dividing
by dt, and solving for de/dt,we get
de
dt
= T
ds
dt
+
p
2
d
dt
. (1.530)
This is still essentially a thermodynamic denition of s. Now use Eq. (1.530) in the non-
conservative energy equation (1.516) to get an alternate expression for the rst law:
T
ds
dt
+
p
d
dt
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.531)
Recalling Eq. (1.427),
i
v
i
= (1/)(d/dt), we have
T
ds
dt
=
i
q
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.532)
ds
dt
=
1
T

i
q
i
+
1
T

ij
i
v
j
. (1.533)
Using the fact that from the quotient rule we have
i
(q
i
/T) = (1/T)
i
q
i
(q
i
/T
2
)
i
T, we
can then say
ds
dt
=
i
_
q
i
T
_
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
i
v
j
, (1.534)
ds
dt
=
T
_
q
T
_
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
: v
T
. (1.535)
From this statement, we can conclude from the rst law of thermodynamics that the entropy
of a uid particle changes due to heat transfer and to deformation in the presence of viscous
stress. We will make a more precise statement about entropy changes after we introduce the
second law of thermodynamics.
The energy equation in terms of entropy can be written in conservative or divergence
form by adding the product of s and the mass equation, s
o
+ s
i
(v
i
) = 0, to Eq. (1.534)
to obtain
o
(s) +
i
(v
i
s) =
i
_
q
i
T
_
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
i
v
j
, (1.536)
t
(s) +
T
(vs) =
T
_
q
T
_
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
: v
T
. (1.537)
1.4.5 Entropy inequality
Let us use a non-rigorous method to suggest a form of the entropy inequality which is
consistent with classical thermodynamics. Recall the mathematical statement of the entropy
inequality from classical thermodynamics:
dS
dQ
T
. (1.538)
Here S is the extensive entropy, with SI units J/K, and Q is the heat energy into a system
with SI units of J. Notice that entropy can go up or down in a process, depending on the
heat transferred. If the process is adiabatic, dQ = 0, and the entropy can either remain xed
or rise. Now for our continuous material we have
dS = s dV, (1.539)
dQ = q
i
n
i
dA dt, (1.540)
(1.541)
Here we have used s for the specic entropy, which has SI units J/kg/K. We have also
changed, for obvious reasons, the notation for our element of surface area, now dA, rather
than the previous dS. Notice we must be careful with our sign convention. When the
heat ux vector is aligned with the outward normal, heat leaves the system. Since we want
positive dQ to represent heat into a system, we need the negative sign.
The second law becomes then
s dV
q
i
T
n
i
dA dt. (1.542)
Now integrate over the nite geometry: on the left side this is a volume integral and the
right side this is an area integral.
_
MR(t)
s dV
__
MS(t)
q
i
T
n
i
dA
_
dt. (1.543)
(1.544)
Dierentiating with respect to time and then applying our typical machinery to the
second law gives rise to
d
dt
_
MR(t)
sdV
_
MS(t)
q
i
T
n
i
dA, (1.545)
_
MR(t)
o
(s)dV +
_
MS(t)
sv
i
n
i
dA
_
MS(t)
q
i
T
n
i
dA, (1.546)
_
MR(t)
(
o
(s) +
i
(sv
i
)) dV
_
MR(t)
i
_
q
i
T
_
dV, (1.547)
_
MR(t)
(
o
(s) +
i
(sv
i
)) dV =
_
MR(t)
i
_
q
i
T
_
dV +
_
MR(t)
IdV, (1.548)
where irreversibility I 0,
o
(s) +
i
(sv
i
) =
i
_
q
i
T
_
+ I, (1.549)
ds
dt
=
i
_
q
i
T
_
+ I. (1.550)
This is the second law. Now if we subtract from this the rst law written in terms of entropy,
Eq. (1.534), we get the result
I =
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
i
v
j
. .
. (1.551)
As an aside, we have dened the commonly used viscous dissipation function as
=
ij
i
v
j
. (1.552)
For symmetric stress tensors, we also have =
ij

(i
v
j)
. Now since I 0, we can view the
entirety of the second law as the following constraint, sometimes called the weak form of the
Clausius-Duhem
2829
inequality:
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
i
v
j
0, (1.553)
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
: v
T
0, (1.554)
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
: F 0. (1.555)
Recalling that
ij
is symmetric by the angular momenta principle for no external body
couples, and, consequently, that its tensor inner product with the velocity gradient only has
a contribution from the symmetric part of the velocity gradient (that is, the deformation
rate or strain rate tensor), the entropy inequality reduces slightly to
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
(i
v
j)
0, (1.556)
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
:
_
v
T
+
_
v
T
_
T
2
_
0, (1.557)
1
T
2
q
T
T +
1
T
: D 0. (1.558)
28
Rudolf Clausius, 1822-1888, Prussian-born German mathematical physicist, key gure in making ther-
modynamics a science, author of well-known statement of the second law of thermodynamics, taught at
Z urich Polytechnikum, University of W urzburg, and University of Bonn.
29
Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem, 1861-1916, French physicist, mathematician, and philosopher, taught at
Lille, Rennes, and the University of Bordeaux.
We shall see in upcoming sections that we will be able to specify q
i
and
ij
in such a fashion
that is both consistent with experiment and satises the entropy inequality.
The more restrictive (and in some cases, overly restrictive) strong form of the Clausius-
Duhem inequality requires each term to be greater than or equal to zero. For our system
the strong form, realizing that the absolute temperature T > 0, is
q
i
i
T 0,
ij
(i
v
j)
. .
0, (1.559)
q
T
T 0, :
_
v
T
+
_
v
T
_
T
2
_
0. (1.560)
It is straightforward to show that terms which generate entropy due to viscous work
also dissipate mechanical energy. This can be cleanly demonstrated by considering the
mechanisms which cause mechanical energy the change within a nite xed control volume
V . First consider a restatement of the mechanical energy equation, Eq. (1.508) in terms of
the material derivative of specic kinetic energy:
d
dt
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
= v
j
f
j
v
j
j
(p) + v
j
ij
. (1.561)
Now use the product rule to restate the pressure and viscous work terms so as to achieve
d
dt
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
= v
j
f
j
j
(v
j
p) + p
j
v
j
+
i
(
ij
v
j
)
ij
i
v
j
. .
= 0
. (1.562)
So, here we see what induces local changes in mechanical energy. We see that body forces,
pressure forces and viscous forces in general can induce the mechanical energy to rise or fall.
However that part of the viscous stresses which is associated with the viscous dissipation,
, is guaranteed to induce a local decrease in mechanical energy.
To study global changes in mechanical energy, we consider the conservative form of the
mechanical energy equation, Eq. (1.510), here written in the same way which takes advantage
of application of the product rule to the pressure and viscous terms:
o
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
+
i
_
v
i
v
j
v
j
2
_
= v
j
f
j
j
(v
j
p) + p
j
v
j
+
i
(
ij
v
j
)
ij
i
v
j
. (1.563)
Now integrate over the xed control volume, so that
_
V
o
_
v
j
v
j
2
_
dV +
_
V
i
_
v
i
v
j
v
j
2
_
dV =
_
V
v
j
f
j
dV
_
V
j
(v
j
p) dV +
_
V
p
j
v
j
dV
+
_
V
i
(
ij
v
j
) dV
_
V
ij
i
v
j
dV. (1.564)
Applying Leibnizs rule and Gausss law, we get
t
_
V
v
j
v
j
2
dV +
_
S
n
i
v
i
v
j
v
j
2
dS =
_
V
v
j
f
j
dV
_
S
n
j
v
j
p dS +
_
V
p
j
v
j
dV
+
_
S
n
i
(
ij
v
j
) dS
_
V
ij
i
v
j
dV. (1.565)
Now on the surface of the xed volume, the velocity is zero, so we get
t
_
V
v
j
v
j
2
dV =
_
V
v
j
f
j
dV +
_
V
p
j
v
j
dV
_
V
ij
i
v
j
. .
positive
dV. (1.566)
Now the strong form of the second law requires that
ij
i
v
j
=
ij
(i
v
j)
0. So, we see for
a nite xed volume of uid that a body force and pressure force in conjunction with local
volume changes can cause the global mechanical energy to either grow or decay, the viscous
stress always induces a decay of global mechanical energy; in other words it is a dissipative
eect.
1.4.6 Summary of axioms in dierential form
Here we pause to summarize the mathematical form of our axioms. We give the Cartesian
index, Gibbs, and the full non-orthogonal index notation. All details of development of
the non-orthogonal index notation are omitted, and the reader is referred to Aris for a full
development. We will rst present the conservative form and then the non-conservative form.
1.4.6.1 Conservative form
1.4.6.1.1 Cartesian index form
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.567)
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) = f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.568)
ij
=
ji
, (1.569)
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
=
i
q
i
i
(pv
i
) +
i
(
ij
v
j
)
+v
i
f
i
, (1.570)
o
(s) +
i
(sv
i
)
i
_
q
i
T
_
. (1.571)
1.4.6.1.2 Gibbs form
t
+
T
(v) = 0, (1.572)
t
(v) +
_
T
(vv
T
)
_
T
= f p +
_
T

_
T
, (1.573)
=
T
, (1.574)
t
_
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
+
T
_
v
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
=
T
q
T
(pv)
+
T
( v) + v
T
f , (1.575)
s
t
+
T
(sv)
T
_
q
T
_
. (1.576)
1.4.6.1.3 Non-orthogonal index form Here we introduce, following Aris and many
others, some standard notation from tensor analysis. In this notation, both sub- and su-
perscripts are needed to distinguish between what are known as covariant and contravari-
ant vectors, which are really dierent mathematical representations of the same quan-
tity, just cast onto dierent basis vectors. In brief, we have the metric tensor g
ij
=
k
x
i
k
x
j
, where
k
is a Cartesian coordinate and x
i
is a non-Cartesian coordinate. We
also have g
ij
=
1
2
imn
jpq
g
mp
g
nq
,

g = det

k
x
i
. The Christoel
30
symbols are given by
m
ij
=
1
2
g
mk
_
g
jk
x
i
+
g
ki
x
j

g
ij
x
k
_
. We note also that few texts give a proper exposition of the
conservative form of the equations in non-orthogonal coordinates. Here we have extended
the development of Vinokur
31
to include the eects of momentum and energy diusion. This
extension has been guided by general notions found in standard works such as Aris as well
as the book of Liseikin.
t
(
g ) +

x
k
_
g v
k
_
= 0, (1.577)
t
_
g v
j

i
x
j
_
+

x
k
_
g v
j
v
k

i
x
j
_
=

g f
j

i
x
j

x
k
_
g pg
jk

i
x
j
_
+

x
k
_
g
jk

i
x
j
_
,
(1.578)
t
_
g
_
e +
1
2
g
ij
v
i
v
j
__
+

x
k
_
g v
k
_
e +
1
2
g
ij
v
i
v
j
__
=

x
k
_
g q
k
_

x
k
_
g pv
k
_
+

x
k
_
g g
ij
v
j
ik
_
+
g g
ij
v
j
f
i
, (1.579)
t
(
g s) +

x
k
_
g sv
k
_

x
k
_
g
q
k
T
_
. (1.580)
30
Elwin Bruno Christoel, 1829-1900, German mathematician and physicist.
31
Vinokur, M., 1974, Conservation Equations of Gasdynamics, Journal of Computational Physics, 14(2):
105-125.
1.4.6.2 Non-conservative form
d
dt
=
i
v
i
, (1.581)
dv
i
dt
= f
i
i
p +
j
ji
, (1.582)
ij
=
ji
, (1.583)
de
dt
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.584)
ds
dt

i
_
q
i
T
_
. (1.585)
d
dt
=
T
v, (1.586)
dv
dt
= f p +
_
T

_
T
, (1.587)
=
T
, (1.588)
de
dt
=
T
q p
T
v + : v
T
, (1.589)
ds
dt

T
_
q
T
_
. (1.590)
1.4.6.2.3 Non-orthogonal index form These have not been checked carefully!
t
+ v
i

x
i
=

x
i
_
g v
i
_
, (1.591)
_
v
i
t
+ v
j
_
v
i
x
j
+
i
jl
v
l
__
= f
i
g
ij
p
x
j
+
1
x
j
_
g
ij
_
+
i
jk
jk
, (1.592)
_
e
t
+ v
i
e
x
i
_
=
1
x
i
_
g q
i
_
x
i
_
g v
i
_
+g
ik
kj
_
v
i
x
j
+
i
jl
v
l
_
, (1.593)
_
s
t
+ v
i
s
x
i
_

1
x
i
_
g
q
i
T
_
. (1.594)
1.4.6.3 Physical interpretations
Each term in the governing axioms represents a physical mechanism. This approach is
emphasized in the classical text by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot on transport processes.
In general, the equations which are partial dierential equations can be represented in the
following form:
local change = advection + diusion + source. (1.595)
Here we consider advection and diusion to be types of transport phenomena. If we have a
xed volume of material, a property of that material, such as its thermal energy, can change
because an outside ow sweeps energy in from outside. That is advection. It can change
because random molecular motions allow slow leakage to the outside or leakage in from the
outside. That is diusion. Or the material can undergo intrinsic changes inside, such as
viscous work, which converts kinetic energy into thermal energy.
Let us write the Gibbs form of the non-conservative equations of mass, linear momentum,
and energy in a slightly dierent way to illustrate these mechanisms:
t
= local change in mass
v
T
advection of mass
+0 diusion of mass
T
v, volume expansion source (1.596)
v
t
= local change in linear momenta
_
v
T

_
v advection of linear momenta
+
_
T

_
T
, diusion of linear momenta (1.597)
+f body force source of linear momenta
p pressure force source of linear momenta
e
t
= local change in thermal energy
v
T
e advection of thermal energy
T
q diusion of thermal energy
p
T
v pressure work thermal energy source
+ : v
T
viscous work thermal energy source. (1.598)
Briey considering the second law, we note that the irreversibility I is solely associated
with diusion of linear momenta and diusion of energy. This makes sense in that diusion
is associated with random molecular motions and thus disorder. Convection is associated
with an ordered motion of matter in that we retain knowledge of the position of the matter.
Pressure volume work is a reversible work and does not contribute to entropy changes. A
portion of the heat transfer can be considered to be reversible. All of the work done by the
viscous forces is irreversible work.
1.4.7 Complete system of equations?
The beauty of these axioms is that they are valid for any material which can be modeled
as a continuum under the inuence of the forces we have mentioned. Specically, they are
valid for both solid and uid mechanics, which is remarkable.
While the axioms are complete, the equations are not! Note that we have twenty-three
unknowns here (1), v
i
(3), f
i
(3), p(1),
ij
(9), e(1), q
i
(3), T(1), s(1), and only eight equations
(one mass, three linear momenta, three independent angular momenta, one energy). We
cannot really count the second law as an equation, as it is an inequality. Whatever result we
get must be consistent with it. Whatever the case we are short a number of equations. We will
see in a later section how we use constitutive equations, equations founded in empiricism,
which in some sense model sub-continuum eects that we have ignored, to complete our
system.
Before we go onto this, however, we will in the next section discuss integral control
volume forms of the governing equations.
1.4.8 Integral forms
Our governing equations are formulated based upon laws which apply to a material
element.
We are not often interested in an actual material element but in some other xed of
moving region in space.
Rules for such systems can by formulated with Leibnizs rule in conjunction with the
dierential forms of our axioms.
Let us rst apply Leibnizs rule (1.178) to an arbitrary function f over a time dependent
arbitrary region AR(t):
d
dt
_
AR(t)
fdV =
_
AR(t)
f
t
dV +
_
AS(t)
n
i
w
i
fdS. (1.599)
Recall that w
i
is the velocity of the arbitrary surface, not necessarily the particle velocity.
1.4.8.1 Mass
Rewriting the mass equation as
o
=
i
(v
i
), (1.600)
Now lets use this, and let f = in Leibnizs rule to get
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV =
_
AR(t)
o
dV +
_
AS(t)
n
i
w
i
dS, (1.601)
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV =
_
AR(t)
(
i
(v
i
))dV +
_
AS(t)
n
i
w
i
dS, (1.602)
with Gauss (1.603)
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV =
_
AS(t)
n
i
(w
i
v
i
)dS. (1.604)
Now consider three special cases.
1.4.8.1.1 Fixed region We take w
i
= 0.
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV =
_
AS(t)
n
i
v
i
dS, (1.605)
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV +
_
AS(t)
n
i
v
i
dS = 0. (1.606)
1.4.8.1.2 Material region Here we take w
i
= v
i
.
d
dt
_
MR(t)
dV = 0. (1.607)
1.4.8.1.3 Moving solid enclosure with holes Say the region considered is a solid
enclosure with holes through with uid can enter and exit. The our arbitrary surface AS(t)
can be specied as
AS(t) = A
e
(t) area of entrances and exits (1.608)
+A
s
(t) solid moving surface with w
i
= v
i
(1.609)
+A
s
xed solid surface with w
i
= v
i
= 0. (1.610)
Then we get
d
dt
_
AR(t)
dV +
_
Ae(t)
n
i
(v
i
w
i
)dS = 0. (1.611)
Example 1.10
Consider the volume sketched in Figure 1.24. Water enters a circular hole of diameter D
1
= 1 with
velocity v
1
= 3 ft/s. Water enters another circular hole of diameter D
2
= 3 with velocity v
2
= 2 ft/s.
The cross sectional area of the cylindrical tank is A = 2 ft
2
. The tank has height H. Water at density
w
exists in the tank at height h(t). Air at density
a
lls the remainder of the tank. Find the rate of
rise of the water
dh
dt
.
Consider two control volumes
V
1
: the xed region enclosing the entire tank, and
V
2
(t): the material region attached to the air.
First, let us write mass conservation for the material region 2:
air
a
V (fixed)
1
V (t) (material volume)
2
h(t)
H
D = 1"
v = 3 ft/s
1
1
D = 3"
v = 2 ft/s
2
2
z
water
w
A = 2 ft
2
Figure 1.24: Sketch of volume with water and air being lled with water.
d
dt
_
V2
a
dV = 0, (1.612)
d
dt
_
H
h(t)
a
Adz = 0. (1.613)
Mass conservation for V
1
is
d
dt
_
V1
dV +
_
Ae
v
i
n
i
dS = 0. (1.614)
Now break up V
1
and write A
e
explicitly
d
dt
_
h(t)
0
w
Adz +
d
dt
_
H
h(t)
a
Adz
. .
=0
=
_
A1
w
v
i
n
i
dS
_
A2
w
v
i
n
i
dS, (1.615)
d
dt
_
h(t)
0
w
Adz =
w
v
1
A
1
+
2
v
2
A
2
, (1.616)
=

w
4
(v
1
D
2
1
+ v
2
D
2
2
), (1.617)
w
A
d
dt
_
h(t)
0
dz =

w
4
(v
1
D
2
1
+ v
2
D
2
2
), (1.618)
dh
dt
=

4A
(v
1
D
2
1
+ v
2
D
2
2
) (1.619)
=

4(2 ft
2
)
_
(3 ft/s)
_
1
12
ft
_
2
+ (2 ft/s)
_
3
12
_
ft)
2
_
(1.620)
= 0.057
ft
s
. (1.621)
1.4.8.2 Linear momenta
Let us perform the same exercise for the linear momenta equation. First, in a strictly
mathematical step, apply Leibnizs rule to linear momenta, v
i
:
d
dt
_
AR(t)
v
i
dV =
_
AR(t)
o
(v
i
)dV +
_
AS(t)
n
j
w
j
v
i
dS. (1.622)
Now invoke the physical linear momenta axiom. Here the axiom gives us an expression for
o
(v
i
). We will also convert volume integrals to surface integrals via Gausss theorem to
get
d
dt
_
AR(t)
v
i
dV =
_
AS(t)
(n
j
(v
j
w
j
)v
i
+ n
i
p n
j
ij
)dS +
_
AR(t)
f
i
dV. (1.623)
Now momentum ux terms only have values at entrances and exits (at solid surfaces we get
v
i
= w
i
, so we can say
d
dt
_
AR(t)
v
i
dV +
_
Ae(t)
n
j
(v
j
w
j
)v
i
dS =
_
AS(t)
n
i
pdS +
_
AS(t)
n
j
ij
dS +
_
AR(t)
f
i
dV.
(1.624)
Note that the surface forces are evaluated along all surfaces, not just entrances and exits.
1.4.8.3 Energy
Applying the same analysis to the energy equation, we obtain
d
dt
_
AR(t)
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
dV =
_
AS(t)
n
i
(v
i
w
i
)
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
dS
_
AR(t)
n
i
q
i
dS
_
AS(t)
(n
i
v
i
p n
i
ij
v
j
)dS
+
_
AR(t)
v
i
f
i
dV. (1.625)
1.5. CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS 107
1.4.8.4 General expression
If we have a governing equation from a physical principle which is of form
o
f
j
+
i
(v
i
f
j
) =
i
g
j
+ h
j
, (1.626)
then we can say for an arbitrary volume that
d
dt
_
AR(t)
f
j
dV
. .
change of f
j
=
_
AS(t)
n
i
f
j
(v
i
w
i
)dS
. .
ux of f
j
+
_
AS(t)
n
i
g
j
dS
. .
eect of g
j
+
_
AR(t)
h
j
dV
. .
eect of h
j
. (1.627)
1.5 Constitutive equations
We now return to the problem of completing our set of equations. We recall we have too
many unknowns and not enough equations. Constitutive equations are additional equations
which are not as fundamental as the previously developed axioms. They can be rather
ad hoc relations which in some sense model the sub-continuum nano-structure. In some
cases, for example, the sub-continuum kinetic theory of gases, we can formally show that
when the sub-continuum is formally averaged, that we obtain commonly used constitutive
equations. In most cases however, constitutive equations simply represent curve ts to basic
experimental results, which can vary widely from material to material. As is briey discussed
below, constitutive equations are not completely arbitrary. Whatever is proposed must allow
our nal equations to be invariant under Galilean
32
transformations and rotations as well as
satisfy the entropy inequality.
For example, we might hope to develop a constitutive equation for the heat ux vector
q
i
. Being naive, we might in general expect it to be a function of a large number of variables:
q
i
= q
i
(, p, T, v
i
,
ij
, f
i
, e, s, . . .). (1.628)
The principles of continuum mechanics will rule out some possibilities, but still allow a broad
range of forms.
1.5.1 Frame and material indierence
Our choice of a constitutive law must be invariant under a Galilean transformation (frame
invariance) a rotation (material indierence). Say for example, we propose that the heat
ux vector is proportional to the velocity vector
q
i
= av
i
, trial constitutive relation. (1.629)
32
Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642, Pisa-born Italian astronomer, physicist, and developer of experimental meth-
ods, rst employed a pendulum to keep time, builder and user of telescopes used to validate the Copernican
view of the universe, developer of the principle of inertia and relative motion.
If we changed frames such that velocities in the moving frame were u
i
= v
i
V , we would
have q
i
= a(u
i
+ V ). With this constitutive law, we nd a physical quantity is dependent
on the frame velocity, which we observe to be non-physical; hence we rule out this trial
constitutive relation.
A commonly used constitutive law for stress in a one-dimensional experiment is
12
= b(
1
v
2
)
a
(
1
u
2
)
b
, (1.630)
where u
2
is the displacement of particle. While this may t one-dimensional data well, it is
in no way clear how one could simply extend this to write an expression for
ij
, and many
propositions will fail to satisfy material indierence.
1.5.2 Second law restrictions and Onsager relations
The entropy inequality from the second law of thermodynamics provides additional restric-
tions on the form of constitutive equations. Recall the second law (equivalently, the weak
form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality, Eq. (1.556)) tells us that
1
T
2
q
i
i
T +
1
T

ij
(i
v
j)
0. (1.631)
We would like to nd forms of q
i
and
ij
which are consistent with the above weak form of
the entropy inequality.
1.5.2.1 Weak form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality
The weak form suggests that we may want to consider both q
i
and
ij
to be functions
involving the temperature gradient
i
T and the deformation tensor
(i
v
j)
.
1.5.2.1.1 Non-physical motivating example To see that this is actually too general
of an assumption, it suces to consider a one-dimensional limit. In the one-dimensional
limit, the weak form of the entropy inequality, Eq. (1.556), reduces to
1
T
2
q
T
x
+
1
T

u
x
0. (1.632)
We can write this in a vector form as
(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
_
q
T
u
T
_
0. (1.633)
Note that a factor of u/u was introduced to the viscous stress term. This allows for a
necessary dimensional consistency in that q/T has the same units as u/T. Let us then
hypothesize a linear relationship exists between the generalized uxes q/T and u/T and
the generalized driving gradients
1
T
T
x
and
1
u
u
x
:
q
T
= C
11
_
1
T
T
x
_
+ C
12
1
u
u
x
, (1.634)
u
T
= C
21
_
1
T
T
x
_
+ C
22
1
u
u
x
, (1.635)
(1.636)
In matrix form this becomes
_
q
T
u
T
_
=
_
C
11
C
12
C
21
C
22
__
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
. (1.637)
We then substitute this hypothesized relationship into the entropy inequality to obtain
(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
_
C
11
C
12
C
21
C
22
__
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
0. (1.638)
We next segregate the matrix C
ij
into a symmetric and anti-symmetric part to get
(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
__
C
11
C
12
+C
21
2
C
21
+C
12
2
C
22
_
+
_
0
C
12
C
21
2
C
21
C
12
2
0
___
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
0. (1.639)
Distributing the multiplication, we nd
(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
_
C
11
C
12
+C
21
2
C
21
+C
12
2
C
22
__
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
+(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
_
0
C
12
C
21
2
C
21
C
12
2
0
__
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
. .
=0
0. (1.640)
The second term is identically zero for all values of temperature and velocity gradients. So
what remains is the inequality involving only a symmetric matrix:
(
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
)
_
C
11
C
12
+C
21
2
C
21
+C
12
2
C
22
__
1
T
T
x
1
u
u
x
_
0. (1.641)
Now in a well known result from linear algebra, a necessary and sucient condition for
satisfying the above inequality is that the new coecient matrix be positive semi-denite.
Further, the matrix will be positive semi-denite if it has positive semi-denite eigenvalues.
The eigenvalues of the new coecient matrix can be shown to be
=
1
2
_
(C
11
+ C
22
)
_
(C
11
C
22
)
2
+ (C
12
+ C
21
)
2
_
(1.642)
Since the terms inside the radical are positive semi-denite, the eigenvalues must be real.
This is a consequence of the parent matrix being symmetric. Now we require two positive
semi-denite eigenvalues. First, if C
11
+ C
22
< 0, we obviously have at least one negative
eigenvalue, so we demand that C
11
+ C
22
0. We then must have
C
11
+ C
22

_
(C
11
C
22
)
2
+ (C
12
+ C
21
)
2
. (1.643)
This gives rise to
(C
11
+ C
22
)
2
(C
11
C
22
)
2
+ (C
12
+ C
21
)
2
. (1.644)
Expanding and simplifying, one gets
C
11
C
22

_
C
12
+ C
21
2
_
2
. (1.645)
Now the right side is positive semi-denite, so the left side must be also. Thus
C
11
C
22
0. (1.646)
The only way for the sum and product of C
11
and C
22
to be positive semi-denite is to
demand that C
11
0 and C
22
0. Thus we arrive at the nal set of conditions to satisfy
the second law:
C
11
0, (1.647)
C
22
0, (1.648)
C
11
C
22

_
C
12
+ C
21
2
_
2
. (1.649)
Now an important school of thought, founded by Onsager
33
in twentieth century thermo-
dynamics takes an extra step and makes the further assertion that the original matrix C
ij
itself must be symmetric. That is C
12
= C
21
. This remarkable assertion is independent of the
second law, and is, for other scenarios, consistent with experimental results. Consequently,
the second law in combination with Onsagers independent demand, requires that
C
11
0, (1.650)
C
22
0, (1.651)
C
12

_
C
11
C
22
. (1.652)
All this said, we must dismiss our hypothesis in this specic case on other physical
grounds, namely that such a hypothesis results in an innite shear stress for a uid at
rest! Note that in the special case in which T/x = 0, our hypothesis predicts =
C
22
(T/u
2
)(u/x). Obviously this is inconsistent with any observation and so we reject this
33
Lars Onsager, 1903-1976, Norwegian-born American physical chemist, earned Ph.D. and taught at Yale,
developed a systematic theory for irreversible chemical processes.
hypothesis. Additionally, this assumed form is not frame invariant because of the velocity
dependency. So, why did we go to the trouble to do the above? First, we now have condence
that we should not expect to nd heat ux to depend on deformation. Second, it illustrates
some general techniques in continuum mechanics. Moreover, the techniques we used have
actually been applied to other more complex phenomena which are physical, and of great
practical importance.
1.5.2.1.2 Real physical eects. That such a matrix such as we studied in the previous
section was asserted to be symmetric is a manifestation of what is known as a general
Onsager relation, developed by Onsager in 1931 with a statistical mechanics basis for more
general systems and for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1968. These
actually describe a surprising variety of physical phenomena, and are described in detail
many texts, including Fung and Woods. A well-known example is the Peltier
34
eect in
which conduction of both heat and electrical charge is inuenced by gradients of charge and
temperature. This forms the basis of the operation of a thermocouple. Other relations exist
are the Soret eect in which diusive mass uxes are induced by temperature gradients, the
Dufour eect in which a diusive energy ux is induced by a species concentration gradient,
the Hall
35
eect for coupled electrical and magnetic eects (which explains the operation
of an electric motor), the Seeback
36
eect in which electromotive forces are induced by
dierent conducting elements at dierent temperatures, the Thomson
37
eect in which heat
is transferred when electric current ows in a conductor in which there is a temperature
gradient, and the principle of detailed balance for multi-species chemical reactions.
1.5.2.2 Strong form of the Clausius-Duhem inequality
A less general way to satisfy the second law is to take the sucient (but not necessary!)
condition that each individual term in the entropy inequality to be greater than or equal to
zero:
1
T
2
q
i
i
T 0, and (1.653)
1
T

ij
(i
v
j)
0. (1.654)
Once again, this is called the strong form of the entropy inequality (or the strong form of
the Clausius-Duhem inequality), and is potentially overly restrictive.
34
Jean Charles Athanase Peltier, 1785-1845, French clockmaker, retired at 30 to study science.
35
Edwin Herbert Hall, 1855-1938, Maine-born American physicist, educated at Johns Hopkins University
where he discovered the Hall eect while working on his dissertation, taught at Harvard.
36
Thomas Johann Seebeck, 1770-1831, German medical doctor who studied at Berlin and Gottingen.
37
William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), 1824-1907, Belfast-born British mathematician and physicist, grad-
uated and taught at Glasgow University, key gure in all of 19th century engineering science including
mathematics, thermodynamics, and electrodynamics.
1.5.3 Fouriers law
Let us examine the restriction on q
i
from the strong form of the entropy inequality to infer
the common constitutive relation known as Fouriers law.
38
The portion of the strong form
of the entropy inequality with which we are concerned here is
1
T
2
q
i
i
T 0. (1.655)
Now one way to guarantee this inequality is satised is to specify the constitutive relation
for the heat ux vector as
q
i
= k
i
T, with k 0. (1.656)
This is the well known Fouriers Law for an isotropic material, where k is the thermal
conductivity. It has the proper behavior under Galilean transformations and rotations; more
importantly, it is consistent with macro-scale experiments for isotropic materials, and can be
justied from an underlying micro-scale theory. Substitution of Fouriers law for an isotropic
material into the entropy inequality yields
1
T
2
k(
i
T)(
i
T) 0, (1.657)
which for k 0 is a true statement. Note the second law allows other forms as well. The
expression q
i
= k((
j
T)(
j
T))
i
T is consistent with the second law. It does not match
experiments well for most materials however.
Following Duhamel,
39
we can also generalize Fouriers law for an anisotropic material.
Let us only consider anisotropic materials for which the conductivity in any given direction
is a constant. For such materials, the thermal conductivity is a tensor k
ij
, and Fouriers law
generalizes to
q
i
= k
ij
j
T. (1.658)
This eectively states that for a xed temperature gradient, the heat ux depends on the
orientation. This is characteristic of anisotropic substances such as layered materials. Sub-
stitution of the generalized Fouriers law into the entropy inequality (for
ij
= 0) gives now
1
T
2
k
ij
(
j
T)(
i
T) 0, (1.659)
1
T
2
(
i
T)k
ij
(
j
T) 0, (1.660)
1
T
2
(T)
T
K T 0. (1.661)
38
Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier, 1768-1830, French mathematician and Egyptologist who studied the trans-
fer of heat and the representation of mathematical functions by innite series summations of other functions.
Son of a tailor.
39
Jean Marie Constant Duhamel, 1797-1872, highly regarded mathematics teacher at

Ecole Polytechnique
in Paris who applied mathematics to problems in heat transfer, mechanics, and acoustics.
Now 1/T
2
> 0, so we must have (
i
T)k
ij
(
j
T) 0 for all possible values of T. Now any
possible anti-symmetric portion of k
ij
cannot contribute to the inequality. We can see this
by expanding k
ij
in the entropy inequality to get
i
T
_
1
2
(k
ij
+ k
ji
) +
1
2
(k
ij
k
ji
)
_
j
T 0, (1.662)
i
T
_
k
(ij)
+ k
[ij]
_
j
T 0, (1.663)
(
i
T)k
(ij)
(
j
T) + (
i
T)k
[ij]
(
j
T)
. .
=0
0, (1.664)
(
i
T)k
(ij)
(
j
T) 0. (1.665)
The anti-symmetric part of k
ij
makes no contribution to the entropy generation because
it involves the tensor inner product of a symmetric tensor with an anti-symmetric tensor,
which is identically zero.
Next, we again use the well-known result from linear algebra that the entropy inequality
is satised if k
(ij)
is a positive semi-denite tensor. This will be the case if all the eigenvalues
of k
(ij)
are non-negative. That this is sucient to satisfy the entropy inequality is made
plausible if we consider
j
T to be an eigenvector, so that k
(ij)
j
T =
ij
j
T giving rise to
an entropy inequality of
(
i
T)
ij
(
j
T) 0, (1.666)
(
i
T)(
i
T) 0. (1.667)
The inequality holds for all
i
T as long as 0.
Further now, when we consider the contribution of the heat ux vector to the energy
equation, we see any possible anti-symmetric portion of the conductivity tensor will be
inconsequential as well. This is seen by the following analysis, which considers only relevant
terms in the energy equation
de
dt
=
i
q
i
+ . . . , (1.668)
=
i
(k
ij
j
T) + . . . , (1.669)
= k
ij
j
T + . . . , (1.670)
=
_
k
(ij)
+ k
[ij]
_
j
T + . . . , (1.671)
= k
(ij)
j
T + k
[ij]
j
T
. .
=0
+. . . , (1.672)
= k
(ij)
j
T + . . . . (1.673)
So, it seems any possible anti-symmetric portion of k
ij
will have no consequence as far
as the rst or second laws are concerned. However, an anti-symmetric portion of k
ij
would
induce a heat ux orthogonal to the direction of the temperature gradient. In a remarkable
conrmation of Onsagers principle, experimental measurements on anisotropic crystalline
materials demonstrate that there is no component of heat ux orthogonal to the temperature
gradient, and thus, the conductivity matrix k
ij
in fact has zero anti-symmetric part, and thus
is symmetric, k
ij
= k
ji
. For our particular case with a tensorial conductivity, the competing
eects are the heat uxes in three directions, caused by temperature gradients in three
directions:
_
_
q
1
q
2
q
3
_
_
=
_
_
k
11
k
12
k
13
k
21
k
22
k
23
k
31
k
32
k
33
_
_
_
_
1
T
2
T
3
T
_
_
. (1.674)
The symmetry condition, Onsagers principle, requires that k
12
= k
21
, k
13
= k
31
, and k
23
=
k
32
. So, the experimentally veried Onsager principle further holds that the heat ux for an
anisotropic material is given by
_
_
q
1
q
2
q
3
_
_
=
_
_
k
11
k
12
k
13
k
12
k
22
k
23
k
13
k
23
k
33
_
_
_
_
1
T
2
T
3
T
_
_
. (1.675)
Now it is well known that the conductivity matrix k
ij
will be positive semi-denite if all
its eigenvalues are non-negative. The eigenvalues will be guaranteed real upon adopting
Onsager symmetry. The characteristic polynomial for the eigenvalues is given by
3
I
(1)
k

2
+ I
(2)
k
I
(3)
k
= 0, (1.676)
where the invariants of the conductivity tensor k
ij
, are given by the standard
I
(1)
k
= k
ii
= tr K, (1.677)
I
(2)
k
=
1
2
(k
ii
k
jj
k
ij
k
ji
) = (det K)
_
tr K
1
_
, (1.678)
I
(3)
k
=
ijk
k
1j
k
2j
k
3j
= det K. (1.679)
In a standard result from linear algebra, one can show that if all three invariants are positive
semi-denite, then the eigenvalues are all positive semi-denite, and as a result, the matrix
itself is positive semi-denite. Hence, in order for k
ij
to be positive semi-denite we demand
that
I
(1)
k
0, (1.680)
I
(2)
k
0, (1.681)
I
(3)
k
0, (1.682)
which is equivalent to demanding that
k
11
+ k
22
+ k
33
0, (1.683)
k
11
k
22
+ k
11
k
33
+ k
22
k
33
k
2
12
k
2
13
k
2
23
0, (1.684)
k
13
(k
12
k
23
k
22
k
13
) + k
23
(k
12
k
13
k
11
k
23
) + k
33
(k
11
k
22
k
12
k
12
) 0. (1.685)
If det K = 0, the conditions reduce to
tr K 0, (1.686)
tr K
1
0, (1.687)
det K > 0. (1.688)
Now by considering
i
T = (1, 0, 0)
T
, and demanding (
i
T)k
ij
(
j
T) 0, we conclude that
k
11
0. Similarly, by considering
i
T = (0, 1, 0)
T
and
i
T = (0, 0, 1)
T
, we conclude that
k
22
0 and k
33
0, respectively. Thus tr K 0 is automatically satised. In equation
form, we then have
k
11
0, (1.689)
k
22
0, (1.690)
k
33
0, (1.691)
k
11
k
22
+ k
11
k
33
+ k
22
k
33
k
2
12
k
2
13
k
2
23
0, (1.692)
k
13
(k
12
k
23
k
22
k
13
) + k
23
(k
12
k
13
k
11
k
23
) + k
33
(k
11
k
22
k
12
k
12
) 0. (1.693)
While by no means a proof, numerical experimentation gives strong indication that the
remaining conditions can be satised if, loosely stated, k
11
, k
22
, k
33
>> |k
12
|, |k
23
|, |k
13
|. That
is, for positive semi-deniteness,
each diagonal element must be positive semi-denite,
o-diagonal terms can be positive or negative, and
diagonal terms must have amplitudes which are, loosely speaking, larger than the
amplitudes of o-diagonal terms.
Example 1.11
Let us consider heat conduction in the limit of two dimensions and a constant anisotropic conduc-
tivity tensor, without imposing Onsagers conditions. Let us take then
_
q
1
q
2
_
=
_
k
11
k
12
k
21
k
22
__
1
T
2
T
_
. (1.694)
The second law demands that
(
1
T
2
T )
_
k
11
k
12
k
21
k
22
__
1
T
2
T
_
0. (1.695)
This is expanded as
(
1
T
2
T )
__
k
11
k12+k21
2
k21+k12
2
k
22
_
+
_
0
k12k21
2
k21k12
2
0
___
1
T
2
T
_
0. (1.696)
As before, the anti-symmetric portion makes no contribution to the left hand side, giving rise to
(
1
T
2
T )
_
k
11
k12+k21
2
k21+k12
2
k
22
__
1
T
2
T
_
0. (1.697)
And, demanding that the eigenvalues of the symmetric part of the conductivity tensor be positive gives
rise to the conditions, identical to that of an earlier analysis, that
k
11
0, (1.698)
k
22
0, (1.699)
k
11
k
22

_
k
12
+ k
21
2
_
2
. (1.700)
The energy equation becomes
de
dt
=
i
q
i
+ . . . , (1.701)
= (
1

2
)
_
k
11
k
12
k
21
k
22
__
1
T
2
T
_
+ . . . , (1.702)
= (
1

2
)
_
k
11
1
T + k
12
2
T
k
21
1
T + k
22
2
T
_
+ . . . , (1.703)
= k
11
1
T + (k
12
+ k
21
)
1
2
T + k
22
2
T + . . . , (1.704)
= k
11
2
T
x
2
1
+ (k
12
+ k
21
)

2
T
x
1
x
2
+ k
22
2
T
x
2
2
+ . . . . (1.705)
One sees that the energy evolution depends only on the symmetric part of the conductivity tensor.
Imposition of Onsagers relations gives simply k
12
= k
21
, giving rise to second law restrictions of
k
11
0, (1.706)
k
22
0, (1.707)
k
11
k
22
k
2
12
, (1.708)
and an energy equation of
de
dt
= k
11
2
T
x
2
1
+ 2k
12
2
T
x
1
x
2
+ k
22
2
T
x
2
2
+ . . . . (1.709)
Example 1.12
Consider the ramications of a heat ux vector in violation of Onsagers principle: ux in which
the anisotropic conductivity is purely anti-symmetric. For simplicity consider an incompressible solid
with constant specic heat c. For the heat ux, we take
_
q
1
q
2
_
=
_
0
0
__
1
T
2
T
_
. (1.710)
This holds that heat ux in the 1 direction is induced only by temperature gradients in the 2 direction
and heat ux in the 2 direction is induced only by temperature gradients in the 1 direction.
The second law demands that
(
1
T
2
T )
_
0
0
__
1
T
2
T
_
0, (1.711)
(
1
T
2
T )
_
2
T
1
T
_
0, (1.712)
(
1
T)(
2
T) + (
1
T)(
2
T) 0, (1.713)
0 0. (1.714)
So, the second law holds.
For the incompressible solid with constant heat capacity, the velocity eld is zero, and the energy
equation reduces to the simple
c
T
t
=
i
q
i
. (1.715)
Imposing our unusual expression for heat ux, we get
c
T
t
= (
1

2
)
_
0
0
__
1
T
2
T
_
, (1.716)
= (
1

2
)
_
2
T
1
T
_
, (1.717)
=
1
2
T +
1
2
T, (1.718)
= 0. (1.719)
So, this unusual heat ux vector is one which induces no change in temperature. In terms of the rst law
of thermodynamics, a net energy ux into a control volume in the 1 direction is exactly counterbalanced
by an net energy ux out of the same control volume in the 2 direction. Thus the rst law holds as
well.
Let us consider a temperature distribution for this unusual material. And let us consider it to apply
to the domain x [0, 1], y [0, 1], t [0, ]. Take
T(x
1
, x
2
, t) = x
2
. (1.720)
Obviously this satises the rst law as
T
t
= 0. Let us check the heat ux.
q
1
=
2
T = , (1.721)
q
2
=
1
T = 0. (1.722)
Now the lower boundary at x
2
= 0 has T = 0. The upper boundary has x
2
= 1 so T = 1. And this
constant temperature gradient in the 2 direction is inducing a constant heat ux in the 1 direction,
q
1
= . The energy ux that enters at x
1
= 0 departs at x
1
= 1, maintaining energy conservation.
One can consider an equivalent problem in cylindrical coordinates. Taking
x
1
= r cos , x
2
= r sin, (1.723)
and applying the chain rule,
_
2
_
=
_
r
x1
x1
r
x2
x2
__

r
_
, (1.724)
one nds
_
2
_
=
_
cos
sin
r
sin
cos
r
__

r
_
. (1.725)
So, transforming q
1
=
2
T, and q
2
=
1
T gives
_
q
1
q
2
_
=
_
sin
cos
r
cos
sin
r
__
T
r
T
_
. (1.726)
Standard trigonometry gives
_
q
r
q
_
=
_
cos sin
sin cos
_
. .
rotation matrix
_
q
1
q
2
_
. (1.727)
Applying the rotation matrix to both sides gives then
_
cos sin
sin cos
__
q
1
q
2
_
=
_
cos sin
sin cos
__
sin
cos
r
cos
sin
r
__
T
r
T
_
, (1.728)
_
q
r
q
_
=
_
0
1
r
1 0
__
T
r
T
_
, (1.729)
or simply
q
r
=

r
T
, (1.730)
q
=
T
r
. (1.731)
Now the steady state temperature distribution in the annular region 1/2 < r < 1, T = r, describes
a domain with an inner boundary held at T = 1/2 and an outer boundary held at T = 1. Such a
temperature distribution would induce a heat ux in the direction only, so that q
r
= 0 and q
= .
That is, the heat goes round and round the domain, but never enters or exits at any boundary.
Now such a ux is counterintuitive precisely because it has never been observed or measured. It is
for this reason that we can adopt Onsagers hypothesis and demand that, independent of the rst and
second laws of thermodynamics,
= 0, (1.732)
and the conductivity tenser is purely symmetric.
1.5.4 Stress-strain rate relation for a Newtonian uid
We now seek to satisfy the second part of the strong form of the entropy inequality, namely
(and recalling that T > 0)
ij
(i
v
j)
. .
0. (1.733)
This form suggests that we seek a constitutive equation for the viscous stress tensor
ij
which is a function of the deformation tensor
(i
v
j)
. Fortunately, such a form exists, which
moreover agrees with macro-scale experiments and micro-scale theories. Here we will focus
on the simplest of such theories, for what is known as a Newtonian uid, a uid which
is isotropic and whose viscous stress varies linearly with strain rate. In general, this is a
discipline unto itself known as rheology.
1.5.4.1 Underlying experiments
We can pull a at plate over a uid and measure the force necessary to maintain a specied
velocity. This situation and some expected results are sketched in Figure 1.25. We observe
that
h
F
v
x
1
x
2
v
F
cross sectional area A
v/h
F/A h
h
h
1
2
3
Figure 1.25: Sketch of simple Couette ow experiment with measurements of stress versus
strain rate.
At the upper and lower plate surfaces, the uid has the same velocity of each plate.
This is called the no slip condition.
The faster the velocity V of the upper plate is, the higher the force necessary to pull
the plate is. The increase can be linear or non-linear.
When experiments are carried out with dierent plate area and dierent gap width, a
single universal curve results when F/A is plotted against V/h.
The velocity prole is linear with increasing x
2
.
In a way similar on a molecular scale to energy diusion, this experiment is describing
a diusion of momentum from the pulled plate into the uid below it. The constitutive
equation we develop for viscous stress, when combined with the governing axioms, will
model momentum diusion.
We can associate F/A with a shear stress:
21
, recalling stress on the 2 face in the 1
direction. We can associate V/h with a velocity gradient, here
2
v
1
. We note that considering
the velocity gradient is essentially equivalent to considering the deformation gradient, as far
as the second law is concerned, and so we will be loose here in our use of the term. We dene
the coecient of viscosity for this conguration as
=

21
2
v
1
=
viscous stress
strain rate
. (1.734)
The viscosity is the analog of Youngs
40
modulus in solid mechanics, which is the ratio
of stress to strain. In general is a thermodynamic property of a material. It is often
a strong function of temperature, but can vary with pressure as well. A Newtonian uid
has a viscosity which does not depend on strain rate (but could depend on temperature and
pressure). A non-Newtonian uid has a viscosity which is strain rate dependent (and possible
temperature and pressure). Some typical behavior is sketched in Figure 1.26. We shall focus
here on uids whose viscosity is not a function of strain rate. Much of our development will
be valid for temperature and pressure dependent viscosity, while most actual examples will
consider only constant viscosity.
1.5.4.2 Analysis for isotropic Newtonian uid
Here we shall outline the method described by Whitaker (p. 139-145) to describe the viscous
stress as a function of strain rate for an isotropic uid with constant viscosity. An isotropic
uid has no directional dependencies when subjected to a force. A uid composed of aligned
long chain polymers is an example of a uid that is most likely not isotropic. Following
Whitaker, we
40
Thomas Young, 1773-1829, English physician and physicist whose experiments in interferometry revived
the wave theory of light, Egyptologist who helped decipher the Rosetta stone, worked on surface tension in
uids, gave the word energy scientic signicance, and developed Youngs modulus in elasticity.
21
v
1
x
2
dilatant
Newtonian
Bingham
plastic
pseudo-plastic
1
Figure 1.26: Variation of viscous stress with strain rate for typical uids.
postulate that stress is a function of deformation rate (strain rate) only:
41
ij
= f
ij
(
(k
v
l)
). (1.735)
Written out in more detail, we have postulated a relationship of the form
11
= f
11
(
(1
v
1)
,
(2
v
2)
,
(3
v
3)
,
(1
v
2)
,
(2
v
3)
,
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
,
(3
v
2)
,
(1
v
3)
), (1.736)
12
= f
12
(
(1
v
1)
,
(2
v
2)
,
(3
v
3)
,
(1
v
2)
,
(2
v
3)
,
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
,
(3
v
2)
,
(1
v
3)
), (1.737)
.
.
. (1.738)
33
= f
33
(
(1
v
1)
,
(2
v
2)
,
(3
v
3)
,
(1
v
2)
,
(2
v
3)
,
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
,
(3
v
2)
,
(1
v
3)
). (1.739)
require that
ij
= 0 if
(i
v
j)
= 0, hence, no strain rate, no stress.
require that stress is linearly related to strain rate:
ij
=

C
ijkl
(k
v
l)
. (1.740)
This is the imposition of the assumption of a Newtonian uid. Here

C
ijkl
is a fourth
41
Thus we are not allowing viscous stress to be a function of the rigid body rotation rate. While it seems
intuitive that rigid body rotation should not induce viscous stress, Batchelor mentions that there is no
rigorous proof for this; hence, we describe our statement as a postulate.
order tensor. Thus we have in matrix form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
21
32
13
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
1111

C
1122

C
1133

C
1112

C
1123

C
1131

C
1121

C
1132

C
1113
C
2211

C
2222

C
2233

C
2212

C
2223

C
2231

C
2221

C
2232

C
2213
C
3311

C
3322

C
3333

C
3312

C
3323

C
3331

C
3321

C
3332

C
3313
C
1211

C
1222

C
1233

C
1212

C
1223

C
1231

C
1221

C
1232

C
1213
C
2311

C
2322

C
2333

C
2312

C
2323

C
2331

C
2321

C
2332

C
2313
C
3111

C
3122

C
3133

C
3112

C
3123

C
3131

C
3121

C
3132

C
3113
C
2111

C
2122

C
2133

C
2112

C
2123

C
2131

C
2121

C
2132

C
2113
C
3211

C
3222

C
3233

C
3212

C
3223

C
3231

C
3221

C
3232

C
3213
C
1311

C
1322

C
1333

C
1312

C
1323

C
1331

C
1321

C
1332

C
1313
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
(3
v
2)
(1
v
3)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1.741)
There are 3
4
= 81 unknown coecients

C
ijkl
. We found one of them in our simple
experiment in which we found
21
=
12
=
2
v
1
= (2
(1
v
2)
).
Hence in this special case

C
1212
= 2.
Now we could do eighty-one separate experiments, or we could take advantage of the
assumption that the uid has no directional dependency. We will take the following approach.
Observer A conducts an experiment to measure the stress tensor in reference frame A. The
observer begins with the viscosity matrix

C
ijkl
. The experiment is conducted by varying
strain rate and measuring stress. With complete knowledge A feels condent this knowledge
could be used to predict the stress in rotated frame A
.
Consider observer A
who is oriented to frame A
. Oblivious to observer A, A
conducts
the same experiment to measure what for her or him is
ij
The value that A
measures must
be the same that A predicts in order for the system to be isotropic. This places restrictions
on the viscosity matrix

C
ijkl
. We intend to show that if the uid is isotropic only two of the
eighty-one coecients are distinct and non-zero.
We rst use symmetry properties of the stress and strain rate tensor to reduce to thirty-six
unknown coecients. We note that in actuality there are only six independent components
of stress and six independent components of deformation since both are symmetric tensors.
Consequently, we can write our linear stress-strain rate relation as
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
1111

C
1122

C
1133

C
1112
+

C
1121

C
1123
+

C
1132

C
1131
+

C
1113
C
2211

C
2222

C
2233

C
2212
+

C
2221

C
2223
+

C
2232

C
2231
+

C
2213
C
3311

C
3322

C
3333

C
3312
+

C
3321

C
3323
+

C
3332

C
3331
+

C
3313
C
1211

C
1222

C
1233

C
1212
+

C
1221

C
1223
+

C
1232

C
1231
+

C
1213
C
2311

C
2322

C
2333

C
2312
+

C
2321

C
2323
+

C
2332

C
2331
+

C
2313
C
3111

C
3122

C
3133

C
3112
+

C
3121

C
3123
+

C
3132

C
3131
+

C
3113
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
.
(1.742)
Now adopting Whitakers notation for simplication, we dene the above matrix of

Cs as
a new matrix of Cs. Here, now C itself is not a tensor, while

C is a tensor. We take
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
1
x
2
x
3
Figure 1.27: Rotation of 180
about x
3
axis.
equivalently then
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
13
C
14
C
15
C
16
C
21
C
22
C
23
C
24
C
25
C
26
C
31
C
32
C
33
C
34
C
35
C
36
C
41
C
42
C
43
C
44
C
45
C
46
C
51
C
52
C
53
C
54
C
55
C
56
C
61
C
62
C
63
C
64
C
65
C
66
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.743)
Next, recalling that for tensorial quantities
ij
=
ki
lj
kl
, (1.744)
(i
v
j)
=
ki
lj
(k
v
l)
, (1.745)
let us subject our uid to a battery of rotations and see what can be concluded by enforcing
material indierence.
180
rotation about x
3
axis
For this rotation, sketched in Figure 1.27. we have direction cosines
ki
=
_
_
11
= 1
12
= 0
13
= 0
21
= 0
22
= 1
23
= 0
31
= 0
32
= 0
33
= 1
_
_
. (1.746)
Applying the transform rules to each term in the shear stress tensor, we get
11
=
k1
l1
kl
= (1)
2
11
=
11
, (1.747)
22
=
k2
l2
kl
= (1)
2
22
=
22
, (1.748)
33
=
k3
l3
kl
= (1)
2
33
=
33
, (1.749)
12
=
k1
l2
kl
= (1)
2
12
=
12
, (1.750)
23
=
k2
l3
kl
= (1)(1)
23
=
23
, (1.751)
31
=
k3
l1
kl
= (1)(1)
31
=
31
. (1.752)
Likewise we nd that
(1
v
1)
=
(1
v
1)
, (1.753)
(2
v
2)
=
(2
v
2)
, (1.754)
(3
v
3)
=
(3
v
3)
, (1.755)
(1
v
2)
=
(1
v
2)
, (1.756)
(2
v
3)
=
(2
v
3)
, (1.757)
(3
v
1)
=
(3
v
1)
. (1.758)
Now our observer A
who is in the rotated system would say, for instance that
11
= C
11
(1
v
1)
+ C
12
(2
v
2)
+ C
13
(3
v
3)
C
14
(1
v
2)
+ C
15
(2
v
3)
+ C
16
(3
v
1)
, (1.759)
while our observer A who used tensor algebra to predict
11
would say
11
= C
11
(1
v
1)
+ C
12
(2
v
2)
+ C
13
(3
v
3)
C
14
(1
v
2)
C
15
(2
v
3)
C
16
(3
v
1)
, (1.760)
Since we want both predictions to be the same, we must require that
C
15
= C
16
= 0. (1.761)
In matrix form, our observer A would predict for the rotated frame that
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
13
C
14
C
15
C
16
C
21
C
22
C
23
C
24
C
25
C
26
C
31
C
32
C
33
C
34
C
35
C
36
C
41
C
42
C
43
C
44
C
45
C
46
C
51
C
52
C
53
C
54
C
55
C
56
C
61
C
62
C
63
C
64
C
65
C
66
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.762)
To retain material dierence between the predictions of our two observers, we thus
require that C
15
= C
16
= C
25
= C
26
= C
35
= C
36
= C
45
= C
46
= C
51
= C
52
= C
53
=
C
54
= C
61
= C
62
= C
63
= C
64
= 0. This eliminates 16 coecients and gives our
viscosity matrix the form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
13
C
14
0 0
C
21
C
22
C
23
C
24
0 0
C
31
C
32
C
33
C
34
0 0
C
41
C
42
C
43
C
44
0 0
0 0 0 0 C
55
C
56
0 0 0 0 C
65
C
66
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.763)
with only 20 independent coecients.
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
1
x
2
x
3
about x
1
axis.
180
rotation about x
1
axis
This rotation is sketched in Figure 1.28.
Leaving out the details of the previous section, this rotation has a set of direction
cosines of
ij
=
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
_
_
. (1.764)
Application of this rotation leads to the conclusion that the viscosity matrix must be
of the form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
13
0 0 0
C
21
C
22
C
23
0 0 0
C
31
C
32
C
33
0 0 0
0 0 0 C
44
0 0
0 0 0 0 C
55
0
0 0 0 0 0 C
66
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.765)
180
rotation about x
2
axis
One is tempted to perform this rotation as well, but nothing new is learned from it!
90
rotation about x
1
axis
This rotation has a set of direction cosines of
ij
=
_
_
1 0 0
0 0 1
0 1 0
_
_
. (1.766)
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
1
x
2
x
3
about x
1
axis.
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
1
x
2
x
3
about x
3
axis.
of the form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
12
0 0 0
C
21
C
22
C
23
0 0 0
C
21
C
23
C
22
0 0 0
0 0 0 C
44
0 0
0 0 0 0 C
55
0
0 0 0 0 0 C
66
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.767)
90
rotation about x
3
axis
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
1
x
2
x
3
45
o
45
o
about x
3
axis.
ij
=
_
_
0 1 0
1 0 0
0 0 1
_
_
(1.768)
of the form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
11
C
12
C
12
0 0 0
C
12
C
11
C
12
0 0 0
C
12
C
12
C
11
0 0 0
0 0 0 C
44
0 0
0 0 0 0 C
44
0
0 0 0 0 0 C
44
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.769)
90
rotation about x
2
axis
We learn nothing from this rotation.
45
rotation about x
3
axis
ij
=
_
_
2/2
2/2 0
2/2
2/2 0
0 0 1
_
_
. (1.770)
After a lot of algebra, application of this rotation lead to the conclusion that the
viscosity matrix must be of the form
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
44
+ C
12
C
12
C
12
0 0 0
C
12
C
44
+ C
12
C
12
0 0 0
C
12
C
12
C
44
+ C
12
0 0 0
0 0 0 C
44
0 0
0 0 0 0 C
44
0
0 0 0 0 0 C
44
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.771)
Try as we might, we cannot reduce this any further with more rotations. It can be proved
more rigorously, as shown in most books on tensor analysis, that this is the furthest reduction
that can be made. So, for an isotropic Newtonian uid, we can expect two independent
coecients to parameterize the relation between strain rate and viscous stress. The relation
between stress and strain rate can be expressed in detail as
11
= C
44
(1
v
1)
+ C
12
_
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
+
(3
v
3)
_
, (1.772)
22
= C
44
(2
v
2)
+ C
12
_
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
+
(3
v
3)
_
, (1.773)
33
= C
44
(3
v
3)
+ C
12
_
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
+
(3
v
3)
_
, (1.774)
12
= C
44
(1
v
2)
, (1.775)
23
= C
44
(2
v
3)
, (1.776)
31
= C
44
(3
v
1)
. (1.777)
Using traditional notation, we take
C
44
2, where is the rst coecient of viscosity, and
C
12
, where is the second coecient of viscosity.
A similar analysis in solid mechanics leads one to conclude for an isotropic material
in which the stress tensor is linearly related to the strain (rather than the strain rate)
gives rise to two independent coecients, the elastic modulus and the shear modulus.
In solids, these both can be measured, and they are independent.
In terms of our original fourth order tensor, we can write the linear relationship
ij
=
C
ijkl
(i
v
j)
as
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
21
32
13
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
(3
v
2)
(1
v
3)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.778)
We note that because of the symmetry of
(i
v
j)
that the above representation is not unique in
that the following, as well as other linear combinations, is an identically equivalent statement:
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22
33
12
23
31
21
32
13
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
(2
v
1)
(3
v
2)
(1
v
3)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (1.779)
In shorthand Cartesian index and Gibbs notation, the viscous stress tensor is given by
ij
= 2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
ij
, (1.780)
= 2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2
_
+ (
T
v)I. (1.781)
By performing minor algebraic manipulations, the viscous stress tensor can be cast in
a way which elucidates more of the physics of how strain rate inuences stress. It is easily
veried by direct expansion that the viscous stress tensor can be written as
ij
=
_
_
_
(2 + 3)

k
v
k
3
..
mean strain rate
ij
_
_
_
. .
mean viscous stress
+2
_
_
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
. .
deviatoric strain rate
_
_
_
. .
deviatoric viscous stress
, (1.782)
= (2 + 3)
T
v
3
I + 2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2

1
3
T
vI
_
. (1.783)
Here it is seen that a mean strain rate, really a volumetric change, induces a mean viscous
stress, as long as = (2/3). If either = (2/3) or
k
v
k
= 0, all viscous stress is
deviatoric. Further, for = 0, a deviatoric strain rate induces a deviatoric viscous stress.
We can form the mean viscous stress by contracting the viscous stress tensor:
1
3
ii
=
_
2
3
+
_
k
v
k
. (1.784)
Note that the mean viscous stress is a scalar, and is thus independent of orientation; it is
directly proportional to the rst invariant of the viscous stress tensor. Obviously the mean
viscous stress is zero if = (2/3). Now the total stress tensor is given by
T
ij
= p
ij
+ 2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
ij
, (1.785)
T = pI + 2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2
_
+ (
T
v)I. (1.786)
We notice the stress tensor has three components, 1) a uniform diagonal tensor with the
hydrostatic pressure, 2) a tensor which is directly proportional to the strain rate tensor, and
3) a uniform diagonal tensor which is proportional to the rst invariant of the strain rate
tensor: I
(1)

= tr (
(i
v
k)
) =
k
v
k
. Consequently, the stress tensor can be written as
T
ij
=
_
p + I
(1)

_
ij
. .
isotropic
+ 2
(i
v
j)
. .
linear in strain rate
, (1.787)
T =
_
p + I
(1)

_
I + 2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2
_
. (1.788)
Recalling that
ij
= I as well as I
(1)

are invariant under a rotation of coordinate axes, we
deduce that the stress is related linearly to the strain rate. Moreover when the axes are
rotated to be aligned with the principal axes of strain rate, the stress is purely normal stress
and takes on its principal value.
Let us next consider two typical elements to aid in interpreting the relation between
viscous stress and strain rate for a general Newtonian uid.
1.5.4.2.1 Diagonal component Consider a typical diagonal component of the viscous
stress tensor, say
11
:
11
=
_
_
_
_
(2 + 3)
_
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
+
3
v
3
3
_
. .
mean strain rate
_
_
_
_
. .
mean viscous stress
+2
_
_
_
1
v
1
1
3
(
1
v
1
+
2
v
2
+
3
v
3
)
. .
_
_
_
. .
. (1.789)
Note that if we choose our axes to be the principal axes of the strain-rate tensor, then
these terms will appear on the diagonal of the stress tensor and there will be no o-diagonal
elements. Thus the fundamental physics of the stress-strain relationship are completely
embodied in a natural way in the above expression.
1.5.4.2.2 O-diagonal component If we are not aligned with the principle axes, then
o-diagonal terms will be non-zero. A typical o-diagonal component of the viscous stress
tensor, say
12
, has the following form:
12
= 2
_
_
(1
v
2)
+
k
v
k

12
..
=0
_
_
, (1.790)
= 2
(1
v
2)
, (1.791)
= (
1
v
2
+
2
v
1
). (1.792)
Note this is associated with shear deformation for elements aligned with the 1 and 2 axes,
and that it is independent of the value of , which is only associated with the mean strain
rate.
1.5.4.3 Stokes assumption
It is a straightforward matter to measure . It is not at all straightforward to measure
. As discussed earlier, Stokes in the mid-nineteenth century suggested to require that
the mechanical pressure (that is the average normal stress) be equal to the thermodynamic
pressure. We have seen that the consequence of this is Eq. (1.454):
ii
= 0. If we enforce
this on our expression for
ij
, we get
ii
= 0 = 2
(i
v
i)
+
k
v
k
ii
, (1.793)
= 2
i
v
i
+ 3
k
v
k
, (1.794)
= 2
i
v
i
+ 3
i
v
i
, (1.795)
= (2 + 3)
i
v
i
. (1.796)
Since in general
i
v
i
= 0, Stokes assumption implies that
=
2
3
. (1.797)
So, a Newtonian uid satisfying Stokes assumption has the following constitutive equation
for viscous stress
ij
= 2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
. .
. .
, (1.798)
= 2
_
(v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
)
2

1
3
(
T
v)I
_
. (1.799)
Note that incompressible ows have
i
v
i
= 0; thus, plays no role in determining the viscous
stress in such ows. For the uid that obeys Stokes assumption, the viscous stress is entirely
deviatoric and is induced only by a deviatoric strain rate.
1.5.4.4 Second law restrictions
Recall that in order that the constitutive equation for viscous stress be consistent with second
law of thermodynamics, that it is sucient (but perhaps overly restrictive) to require that
1
T

ij
(i
v
j)
0. (1.800)
Invoking our constitutive equation for viscous stress, and realizing that the absolute tem-
perature T > 0, we have then that
= (2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
ij
)(
(i
v
j)
) 0. (1.801)
This reduces to the sum of two squares:
= 2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
i
v
i
0. (1.802)
We then seek restrictions on and such that this is true. Obviously requiring 0 and
0 guarantees satisfaction of the second law. However, Stokes assumption of =
2
3
does not meet this criterion, and so we are motivated to check more carefully to see if we
actually need to be that restrictive.
1.5.4.4.1 One dimensional systems Let us rst check the criterion for a strictly one-
dimensional system. For such a system, our second law restriction reduces to
2
(1
v
1)
(1
v
1)
+
1
v
1
1
v
1
0, (1.803)
(2 + )
1
v
1
1
v
1
0, (1.804)
2 + 0, (1.805)
2. (1.806)
Obviously if > 0 and =
2
3
, the entropy inequality is satised. We also could satisfy
the inequality for negative with suciently large positive .
1.5.4.4.2 Two dimensional systems Extending this to a two dimensional system is
more complicated. For such systems, expansion of our second law condition gives
2
(1
v
1)
(1
v
1)
+ 2
(1
v
2)
(1
v
2)
+ 2
(2
v
1)
(2
v
1)
+ 2
(2
v
2)
(2
v
2)
+
_
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
_ _
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
_
0. (1.807)
Taking advantage of symmetry of the deformation tensor, we can say
2
(1
v
1)
(1
v
1)
+ 4
(1
v
2)
(1
v
2)
+ 2
(2
v
2)
(2
v
2)
+
_
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
_ _
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
_
0.
(1.808)
Expanding the product and regrouping gives
(2 + )
(1
v
1)
(1
v
1)
+ 4
(1
v
2)
(1
v
2)
+ (2 + )
(2
v
2)
(2
v
2)
+ 2
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
0. (1.809)
In matrix form, we can write this inequality in the form known from linear algebra as a
quadratic form:
= (
(1
v
1)

(2
v
2)

(1
v
2)
)
_
_
(2 + ) 0
(2 + ) 0
0 0 4
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(1
v
2)
_
_
0. (1.810)
As we have discussed before, the condition that this hold for all values of the deformation
is that the symmetric part of the coecient matrix have eigenvalues which are greater than
or equal to zero. In fact, here the coecient matrix is purely symmetric. Let us nd the
eigenvalues of the coecient matrix. The eigenvalues are found by evaluating the following
equation
(2 + ) 0
(2 + ) 0
0 0 4
= 0. (1.811)
We get the characteristic polynomial
(4 )
_
(2 + )
2
2
_
= 0. (1.812)
This has roots
= 4, (1.813)
= 2, (1.814)
= 2( + ). (1.815)
For the two-dimensional system, we see now formally that we must satisfy both
0, (1.816)
. (1.817)
This is more restrictive than for the one-dimensional system, but we see that a uid obeying
Stokes assumption =
2
3
still satises this inequality.
1.5.4.4.3 Three dimensional systems For a full three dimensional variation, the en-
tropy inequality (2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
ij
)(
(i
v
j)
) 0, when expanded, is equivalent to the fol-
lowing quadratic form
= (
(1
v
1)

(2
v
2)

(3
v
3)

(1
v
2)

(2
v
3)

(3
v
1) )
_
_
_
_
+ 2 0 0 0
+ 2 0 0 0
+ 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0 4 0
0 0 0 0 0 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
(1
v
2)
(2
v
3)
(3
v
1)
_
_
_
_
0.
(1.818)
Again this must hold for arbitrary values of the deformation, so we must require that the
eigenvalues of the interior matrix be greater than or equal to zero to satisfy the entropy
inequality. It is easy to show that the six eigenvalues for the interior matrix are
= 2, (1.819)
= 2, (1.820)
= 4, (1.821)
= 4, (1.822)
= 4, (1.823)
= 3 + 2. (1.824)
Two of the eigenvalues are degenerate, but this is not a particular problem. We need now
that 0, so the entropy inequality requires that
0, (1.825)

2
3
. (1.826)
Obviously a uid which satises Stokes assumption does not violate the entropy inequality,
but it does give rise to a minimum level of satisfaction. This does not mean the uid is
isentropic! It simply means one of the six eigenvalues is zero.
Now using standard techniques from linear algebra for quadratic forms, the entropy
inequality can, after much eort, be manipulated into the form
=
2
3
_
(
(1
v
1)
(2
v
2)
)
2
+ (
(2
v
2)
(3
v
3)
)
2
+ (
(3
v
3)
(1
v
1)
)
2
_
+
_
+
2
3
_
(
(1
v
1)
+
(2
v
2)
+
(3
v
3)
)
2
+4((
(1
v
2)
)
2
+ (
(2
v
3)
)
2
+ (
(3
v
1)
)
2
) 0. (1.827)
Obviously, this is a sum of perfect squares, and holds for all values of the strain rate tensor.
It can be veried by direct expansion that this term is identical to the strong form of the
entropy inequality for viscous stress. It can further be veried by direct expansion that the
entropy inequality can also be written more compactly as
= 2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
. .
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
m
v
m
ij
_
. .
+
_
+
2
3
_
(
i
v
i
)(
j
v
j
)
. .
(mean strain rate)
2
0.(1.828)
So, we see that for a Newtonian uid that the increase in entropy due to viscous dissipation is
attributable to two eects: deviatoric strain rate and mean strain rate. The terms involving
both are perfect squares, so as long as 0 and
2
3
, the second law is not violated
by viscous eects.
We can also write the strong form of the entropy inequality for a Newtonian uid
(2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
ij
)(
(i
v
j)
) 0, in terms of the principal invariants of strain rate. Leaving
out details, which can be veried by direct expansion of all terms, we nd the following form
= 2
_
2
3
_
I
(1)

_
2
2I
(2)

_
+
_
+
2
3
_
_
I
(1)

_
2
0. (1.829)
Because this is in terms of the invariants, we are assured that it is independent of the
orientation of the coordinate system.
It is, however, not obvious that this form is positive semi-denite. We can use the
denitions of the invariants of strain rate to rewrite the inequality as
= 2
_
(i
v
j)
(j
v
i)
1
3
(
i
v
i
) (
j
v
j
)
_
+
_
+
2
3
_
(
i
v
i
) (
j
v
j
) 0. (1.830)
In terms of the eigenvalues of the strain rate tensor,
1
,
2
, and
3
, this becomes
= 2
_
2
1
+
2
2
+
2
3
1
3
(
1
+
2
+
3
)
2
_
+
_
+
2
3
_
(
1
+
2
+
3
)
2
0. (1.831)
This then reduces to a positive semi-denite form:
=
2
3
_
(
1
2
)
2
+ (
1
3
)
2
+ (
2
3
)
2
_
+
_
+
2
3
_
(
1
+
2
+
3
)
2
0. (1.832)
Since the eigenvalues are invariant under rotation, this form is invariant.
We summarize by noting relations between mean and deviatoric stress and strain rates
for Newtonian uids. The inuence of each on each has been seen or is easily shown to be
as follows:
A mean strain rate will induce a time rate of change in the mean thermodynamic stress
via traditional thermodynamic relations
42
and will induce an additional mean viscous
stress for uids that do not obey Stokes assumption.
A deviatoric strain rate will not directly induce a mean stress.
A deviatoric strain rate will directly induce a deviatoric stress.
A mean strain rate will induce entropy production only for a uid that does not obey
Stokes assumption.
A deviatoric strain rate will always induce entropy production in a viscous uid.
1.5.5 Equations of state
Thermodynamic equations of state provide algebraic relations between variables such as
pressure, temperature, energy, and entropy. They do not involve velocity. They are formally
valid for materials at rest. As long as the times scales of equilibration of the thermodynamic
variables are much faster than the nest time scales of uid dynamics, it is a valid assumption
to use an ordinary equations of state. Such assumptions can be violated in very high speed
ows in which vibrational and rotational modes of oscillation become excited. They may
also be invalid in highly rareed ows such as might occur in the upper atmosphere.
Typically, we will require two types of equations, a thermal equation of state which gives
the pressure as a function of two independent thermodynamic variables, e.g.
p = p(, T), (1.833)
and a caloric equation of state which gives the internal energy as a function of two indepen-
dent thermodynamic variables, e.g.
e = e(, T). (1.834)
42
e.g. for an isothermal ideal gas dp/dt = RT(d/dt) = RT
i
v
i
There are additional conditions regarding internal consistency of the equations of state; that
is, just any stray functional forms will not do.
We outline here a method for generating equations of state with internal consistency based
on satisfying the entropy inequality. First let us dene a new thermodynamic variable, a,
the Helmholtz
43
free energy:
a = e Ts. (1.835)
We can take the material time derivative of Eq. (1.835) to get
da
dt
=
de
dt
T
ds
dt
s
dT
dt
. (1.836)
It is shown in thermodynamics texts that there are a set of natural, canonical, variables
for describing a which are T and . That is, we take a = a(T, ). Taking the time derivative
of this form of a and using the chain rule tells us another form for da/dt:
da
dt
=
a
T
dT
dt
+
a
T
d
dt
. (1.837)
Now we also have the energy equation and entropy inequality:
de
dt
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
, (1.838)
ds
dt

i
_
q
i
T
_
. (1.839)
Using Eq. (1.836) to eliminate de/dt in favor of da/dt in the energy equation, Eq. (1.838),
gives a modied energy equation:
_
da
dt
+ T
ds
dt
+ s
dT
dt
_
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.840)
Next, we use Eq. (1.837) to eliminate da/dt in Eq. (1.840) to get
_
a
T
dT
dt
+
a
T
d
dt
+ T
ds
dt
+ s
dT
dt
_
=
i
q
i
p
i
v
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.841)
Now in this modied energy equation, we solve for ds/dt to get
ds
dt
=
1
T

i
q
i
p
T

i
v
i
+
1
T

ij
i
v
j

T
a
T
dT
dt

T
a
T
d
dt

s
T
dT
dt
. (1.842)
43
Hermann von Helmholtz, 1821-1894, Potsdam-born German physicist and philosopher, descendent of
William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania, empiricist and refuter of the notion that scientic conclusions
could be drawn from philosophical ideas, graduated from medical school, wrote convincingly on the science
and physiology of music, developed theories of vortex motion as well as thermodynamics and electrodynamics.
Substituting this version of the energy conservation equation into the second law, Eq. (1.839),
gives
1
T

i
q
i
p
T

i
v
i
+
1
T

ij
i
v
j

T
a
T
dT
dt

T
a
T
d
dt

s
T
dT
dt

i
_
q
i
T
_
. (1.843)
Rearranging and using the mass conservation relation to eliminate
i
v
i
, we get
q
i
T
2
i
T
p
T
_
d
dt
_
+
1
T

ij
i
v
j

T
a
T
dT
dt

T
a
T
d
dt

s
T
dT
dt
0, (1.844)
q
i
T

i
T +
p
d
dt
+
ij
i
v
j

a
T
dT
dt

a
T
d
dt
s
dT
dt
0, (1.845)
q
i
T

i
T +
ij
i
v
j
+
1
d
dt
_
p
2
a
T
_
dT
dt
_
s +
a
T
_
0. (1.846)
Now in our discussion of the strong form of the energy inequality, we have already found forms
for q
i
and
ij
for which the terms involving these phenomena are positive semi-denite. We
can guarantee the remaining two terms are consistent with the second law, and are associated
with reversible processes by requiring that
p =
2
a
T
, (1.847)
s =
a
T
. (1.848)
For example, if we take the non-obvious, but experimentally defensible choice for a of
a = c
v
(T T
o
) c
v
T ln
_
T
T
o
_
+ RT ln
_
o
_
, (1.849)
then we get for pressure
p =
2
a
T
=
2
_
RT
_
= RT. (1.850)
The above equation for pressure a thermal equation of state for an ideal gas, and R is known
as the gas constant. It is the ratio of the universal gas constant and the molecular mass of
the particular gas.
Solving for entropy s, we get
s =
a
T
= c
v
ln
_
T
T
o
_
Rln
_
o
_
. (1.851)
Then, we get for e
e = a + Ts = c
v
(T T
o
). (1.852)
We call the above equation for energy a caloric equation of state for calorically perfect gas.
It is calorically perfect because the specic heat at constant volume c
v
is assumed a true
constant here. In general for ideal gases, it can be shown to be at most a function of
temperature.
1.6 Boundary and interface conditions
At uid solid interfaces, it is observed in the continuum regime that the uid sticks to the
solid boundary, so that we can safely take the uid and solid velocities to be identical at the
interface. This is called the no slip condition. As one approaches the molecular level, this
breaks down.
At the interface of two distinct, immiscible uids, one requires that stress be continuous
across the interface, that the energy ux be continuous across the interface. Density need
not be continuous in the absence of mass diusion. Were mass diusion present, the uids
would not be immiscible, and density would be a continuous variable. Additionally the eect
of surface tension may need to be accounted for. We shall not consider surface tension in
this course, but many texts give a complete treatment.
1.7 Complete set of compressible Navier-Stokes equa-
tions
Here we pause once more to write a complete set of equations, the compressible Navier
44
-Stokes equations, written here for a uid which satises Stokes assumption, but for which
the viscosity (as well as thermal conductivity k) may be variable. They are given in a form
similar to that done in an earlier section.
1.7.0.1 Conservative form
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.853)
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) = f
i
i
p
+
j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
__
, (1.854)
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
= v
i
f
i
i
(pv
i
) +
i
(k
i
T)
+
i
_
2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
, (1.855)
p = p(, T), (1.856)
e = e(, T), (1.857)
44
Claude Louis Marie Henri Navier, 1785-1836, Dijon-born French civil engineer and mathematician, stud-
ied under Fourier, taught applied mechanics at

Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees, replaced Cauchy as professor
at

Ecole Polytechnique, specialist in road and bridge building, did not fully understand shear stress in a uid
and used faulty logic in arriving at his equations.
1.7. COMPLETE SET OF COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS 139
= (, T), (1.858)
k = k(, T). (1.859)
t
+
T
(v) = 0, (1.860)
t
(v) +
_
T
(vv
T
)
_
T
= f p
+
_
_
2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2

1
3
(
T
v)I
___
T
, (1.861)
t
_
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
+
T
_
v
_
e +
1
2
v
T
v
__
= v
T
f
T
(pv) +
T
(kT)
+
T
__
2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2

1
3
(
T
v)I
__
v
_
, (1.862)
p = p(, T), (1.863)
e = e(, T), (1.864)
= (, T), (1.865)
k = k(, T). (1.866)
1.7.0.2 Non-conservative form
d
dt
=
i
v
i
, (1.867)
dv
i
dt
= f
i
i
p +
j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
__
, (1.868)
de
dt
= p
i
v
i
+
i
(k
i
T) + 2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
i
v
j
, (1.869)
p = p(, T), (1.870)
e = e(, T), (1.871)
= (, T), (1.872)
k = k(, T) (1.873)
d
dt
=
T
v, (1.874)
dv
dt
= f p +
_
_
2
_
v
T
+ (v)
T
2

1
3
(
T
v)I
___
T
, (1.875)
de
dt
= p
T
v +
T
(kT) + 2
_
v
T
+ (v
T
)
T
2

1
3
(
T
v)I
_
: v
T
, (1.876)
p = p(, T), (1.877)
e = e(, T), (1.878)
= (, T), (1.879)
k = k(, T). (1.880)
We take , and k to be thermodynamic properties of temperature and density. In practice,
both dependencies are often weak, especially the dependency of and k on density. We
also assume we know the form of the external body force per unit mass f
i
. We also no
longer formally require the angular momentum principle, as it has been absorbed into our
constitutive equation for viscous stress. We also need not write the second law, as we can
guarantee its satisfaction as long as 0, k 0.
In summary, we have nine unknowns, ,v
i
(3), p, e, T, , and k, and nine equations,
mass, linear momenta (3), energy, thermal state, caloric state, and thermodynamic relations
for viscosity and thermal conductivity. When coupled with initial, interface, and boundary
conditions, all dependent variables can, in principle, be expressed as functions of position x
i
and time t, and this knowledge utilized to design devices of practical importance.
1.8 Incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with con-
stant properties
If we make the assumption, which can be justied in the limit when uid particle velocities
are small relative to the velocity of sound waves in the uid, that density changes following
a particle are negligible (that is
d
dt
0), the Navier-Stokes equations simplify considerably.
Note that this does not imply the density is constant everywhere in the ow. Our assump-
tion allows for stratied ows, for which the density of individual particles still can remain
constant. We shall also assume viscosity , and thermal conductivity k are constants, though
this is not necessary.
Let us examine the mass, linear momenta, and energy equations in this limit.
1.8.1 Mass
Expanding the mass equation
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.881)
we get
o
+ v
i
. .
d
dt
0
+
i
v
i
= 0. (1.882)
1.8. INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH CONSTANT
PROPERTIES 141
We are assuming the rst two terms in the above expression, which form d/dt, go to zero;
hence the mass equation becomes
i
v
i
= 0. Since > 0, we can say
i
v
i
= 0. (1.883)
So, for an incompressible uid, the relative expansion rate for a uid particle is zero.
Let us rst consider the viscous term:
j
_
_
2
_
_
(j
v
i)
1
3

k
v
k
..
=0
ij
_
_
_
_
, (1.884)
j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
__
, (1.885)
j
((
i
v
j
+
j
v
i
)) , (1.886)
since is constant here (1.887)
(
j
i
v
j
+
j
j
v
i
) , (1.888)
_
_
i

j
v
j
..
=0
+
j
j
v
i
_
_
, (1.889)
j
v
i
. (1.890)
Everything else in the linear momenta equation is unchanged; hence we get
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
= f
i
i
p +
j
j
v
i
. (1.891)
Note that in the incompressible constant viscosity limit, the mass and linear momenta equa-
tions form a complete set of four equations in four unknowns: p,v
i
. We will see that in this
limit the energy equation is coupled to mass, and linear momenta, but it is only a one-way
coupling.
1.8.3 Energy
Let us also choose our material to be a liquid, for which the specic heat at constant pres-
sure, c
p
is nearly identical to the specic heat at constant volume c
v
as long as the ratio
T
2
p
/
T
//c
p
<< 1. Here
p
is the coecient of isobaric expansion, and
T
is the coecient
of isothermal compressibility. As long as the liquid is well away from the vaporization point,
this is a good assumption for most materials. We will thus take for the liquid c
p
= c
v
= c.
For an incompressible gas there are some subtleties to this analysis, involving the low Mach
number limit which makes the results not obvious. We will not address that problem in this
course; many texts do, but many also shove the problem under the rug! For a compress-
ible gas there are no such problems. For an incompressible liquid whose specic heat is a
constant, we have e = cT + e
o
. The compressible energy equation in full generality is
de
dt
= p
i
v
i
i
q
i
+
ij
i
v
j
. (1.892)
Imposing our constitutive equations and assumption of incompressibility onto this, we get
d
dt
(cT + e
o
) = p
i
v
i
..
=0
i
(k
i
T) + 2
_
_
(i
v
j)
1
3

k
v
k
..
=0
ij
_
_
i
v
j
, (1.893)
c
dT
dt
= k
i
i
T + 2
(i
v
j)
i
v
j
, (1.894)
= k
i
i
T + 2
(i
v
j)
. .
sym.
_
_
_
(i
v
j)
. .
sym.
+
[i
v
j]
..
antisym.
_
_
_, (1.895)
= k
i
i
T + 2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
. .
. (1.896)
For incompressible ows with constant properties, the viscous dissipation function reduces
to
= 2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
. (1.897)
It is a scalar function and obviously positive for > 0 since it is a tensor inner product of a
tensor with itself.
1.8.4 Summary of incompressible constant property equations
The incompressible constant property equations for a liquid are summarized below in Gibbs
notation:
T
v = 0, (1.898)
dv
dt
= f p +
2
v, (1.899)
c
dT
dt
= k
2
T + . (1.900)
For an ideal gas, it turns out that we should replace c in the above equation by c
p
. The
alternative, c
v
would seem to be the proper choice, but careful analysis in the limit of low
Mach number shows this to be incorrect.
1.9. DIMENSIONLESS COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS 143
1.8.5 Limits for one-dimensional diusion
Note for a static uid (v
i
= 0), we have d/dt = /t and = 0; hence the energy equation
can be written in a familiar form
T
t
=
2
T. (1.901)
Here = k/(c) is dened as the thermal diusivity. For one dimensional cases where all
variation is in the x
2
direction, we get
T
t
=
2
T
x
2
2
. (1.902)
Compare this to the momentum equation for a very specic form of the velocity eld, namely,
v
i
(x
i
) = v
1
(x
2
, t). When we also have no pressure gradient and no body force, the linear
momenta principle reduces to
v
1
t
=
2
v
1
x
2
2
. (1.903)
Here = / is the momentum diusivity. This equation has an identical form to that for
one-dimensional energy diusion. In fact the physical mechanism governing both, random
molecular collisions, is the same.
1.9 Dimensionless compressible Navier-Stokes equations
Here we discuss how to scale the Navier-Stokes equations into a set of dimensionless equa-
tions. Panton gives a general background for scaling. Whites Viscous Flow has a detailed
discussion of the dimensionless form of the Navier-Stokes equations.
Consider the Navier-Stokes equations for a calorically perfect ideal gas which has Newto-
nian behavior, satises Stokes assumption, and has constant viscosity, thermal conductivity,
and specic heat:
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.904)
o
(v
i
) +
j
(v
j
v
i
) = f
i
i
p
+
j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
__
, (1.905)
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
= v
i
f
i
i
(pv
i
) + k
i
i
T
+
i
_
2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
, (1.906)
p = RT, (1.907)
e = c
v
T + e. (1.908)
Here R is the gas constant for the particular gas we are considering, which is the ratio of the
universal gas constant and the gass molecular mass M: R = /M. Also e is a constant.
Now solutions to the above equations, which may be of the form, for example, of
p(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t), are necessarily parameterized by the constants from constitutive laws such as
c
v
, R, , k, f
i
, in addition to parameters from initial and boundary conditions. That is our
solutions will really be of the form
p(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, t; c
v
, R, , k, f
i
, . . .). (1.909)
It is desirable for many reasons to reduce the number of parametric dependencies of these
solutions. Some of these reasons include
identication of groups of terms that truly govern the features of the ow,
eciency of presentation of results, and
eciency of design of experiments.
The Navier-Stokes equations (and nearly all sets of physically motivated equations) can be
reduced in complexity by considering scaled versions of the same equations.
For a given problem, the proper scales are non-unique, though some choices will be more
helpful than others. One generally uses the following rules of thumb in choosing scales:
reduce variables so that their scaled value is near unity,
demonstrate that certain physical mechanisms may be negligible relative to other phys-
ical mechanisms, and
simplify initial and boundary conditions.
In forming dimensionless equations, one must usually look for
characteristic length scale L, and
characteristic time scale t
c
.
Often an ambient velocity or sound speed exists which can be used to form either a length
or time scale, for example
given v
o
, L t
c
=
L
vo
,
given v
o
, t
c
L = v
o
t
c
.
If for example our physical problem involves the ow over a body of length L (and whose
other dimensions are of the same order as L), and free-stream conditions are known to
be p = p
o
, v
i
= (v
o
, 0, 0)
T
, =
o
, as sketched in Figure 1.32, Knowledge of free-stream
pressure and density xes all other free-stream thermodynamic variables, e.g. e, T, via the
thermodynamic relations. For this problem, let the subscript represent a dimensionless
variable. Dene the following scaled dependent variables:
o
, p
=
p
p
o
, v
i
=
v
i
v
o
, T
=

o
R
p
o
T, e
=

o
p
o
e. (1.910)
L
v
P
o
o
o
Figure 1.32: Figure of known ow from innity approaching body with characteristic length
L.
Dene the following scaled independent variables:
x
i
=
x
i
L
, t
=
v
o
L
t. (1.911)
With these denitions, the operators must also be scaled, that is,
o
=

t
=
dt
dt
=
v
o
L
=
v
o
L
o
,
o
=
L
v
o
o
.
i
=

x
i
=
dx
i
dx
i
x
i
=
1
L
x
i
=
1
L
i
,
i
= L
i
. (1.912)
1.9.1 Mass
Let us make these substitutions into the mass equation:
o
+
i
(v
i
) = 0, (1.913)
v
o
L
o
(
o
) +
1
L
i
(
o
v
o
v
i
) = 0, (1.914)
o
v
o
L
(
o
+
i
(
v
i
)) = 0, (1.915)
+
i
(
v
i
) = 0. (1.916)
The mass equation is unchanged in form when we transform to a dimensionless version.
We have a similar analysis for the linear momenta equation.
o
(v
i
)
+
j
(v
j
v
i
) = f
i
i
p
+
j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
__
, (1.917)
v
o
L
o
(
o
v
o
v
i
)
+
1
L
j
(
o
v
o
v
j
v
o
v
i
) =
o
f
i
1
L
i
(p
o
p
)
+
j
_
2
L
_
(j
v
o
v
i)
1
3L
k
v
o
v
k
ji
__
, (1.918)
o
v
2
o
L

o
(
v
i
)
+
o
v
2
o
L

j
(
v
j
v
i
) =
o
f
i
p
o
L
i
(p
)
+
v
o
L
2

j
_
2
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
__
, (1.919)
o
(
v
i
) +
j
(
v
j
v
i
) =
f
i
L
v
2
o
p
o
o
v
2
o
i
(p
)
+
2
o
v
o
L
j
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
_
. (1.920)
With this scaling, we have generated three distinct dimensionless groups of terms which
drive the linear momenta equation:
f
i
L
v
2
o
,
p
o
o
v
2
o
, and

o
v
o
L
. (1.921)
These groups are closely related to the following groups of terms, which have the associated
interpretations indicated:
Froude number Fr:
45
With the body force per unit mass f
i
= g g
i
, where g > 0 is the
gravitational acceleration magnitude and g
i
is a unit vector pointing in the direction
of gravitational acceleration,
Fr
2
v
2
o
gL
=
ow kinetic energy
gravitational potential energy
. (1.922)
Mach number M
o
:
46
With the Mach number M
o
dened as the ratio of the ambient
velocity to the ambient sound speed, and recalling that for a calorically perfect ideal
45
William Froude, 1810-1879, English engineer and naval architect, Oxford educated.
46
Ernst Mach, 1838-1926, Viennese physicist and philosopher who worked in optics, mechanics, and wave
dynamics, received doctorate at University of Vienna and taught mathematics at University of Graz and
physics at Charles University of Prague, developed fundamental ideas of inertia which inuenced Einstein.
gas that the square of the ambient sound speed, a
2
o
is a
2
o
=
po
o
, where is the ratio of
specic heats =
cp
cv
= (1 + R/c
v
), we have
M
2
o

v
2
o
a
2
o
=
v
2
o
po
o
=

o
v
2
o
p
o
=
v
2
o
RT
o
=
ow kinetic energy
thermal energy
. (1.923)
Here we have taken T
o
= p
o
/
o
/R.
Reynolds number Re: We have
Re

o
v
o
L
=

o
v
2
o
vo
L
=
dynamic pressure
viscous stress
. (1.924)
With these denitions, we get
o
(
v
i
) +
j
(
v
j
v
i
) =
1
Fr
2
g
i
1
M
2
o
i
(p
)
+
2
Re
j
_
(j
v
i)
1
3
k
v
k
ji
_
. (1.925)
The relative magnitudes of Fr, M
o
, and Re play a crucial role in determining which physical
mechanisms are most inuential in changing the uids linear momenta.
1.9.3 Energy
The analysis is of the exact same form, but more tedious, for the energy equation.
o
_
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e +
1
2
v
j
v
j
__
= k
i
i
T
i
(pv
i
)
+
i
_
2
_
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
+v
i
f
i
, (1.926)
v
o
L
o
_
_
p
o
o
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
v
j
v
j
__
+
1
L
i
_
v
o
v
i
_
p
o
o
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
v
j
v
j
__
=
k
L
2
i
p
o
o
R
T
1
L
i
(p
o
p
v
o
v
i
)
+
i
_
2
L
_
(i
v
o
v
j)
1
3
k
v
o
v
k
ij
_
v
o
v
j
_
+
o
v
o
v
i
f
i
, (1.927)
o
v
o
L
p
o
o
_
_
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
po
o
v
j
v
j
__
+
o
v
o
L
p
o
i
_
v
i
_
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
po
o
v
j
v
j
__
=
k
L
2
p
o
o
1
R
i
T
p
o
v
o
L

i
(p
v
i
)
+
2v
2
o
L
2

i
__
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
+
o
v
o
f
i
v
i
, (1.928)
o
_
_
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
po
o
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e
+
1
2
v
2
o
po
o
v
j
v
j
__
=
k
LR
o
v
o
i
T
i
(p
v
i
)
+
2v
2
o
L
2
L
o
v
o
1
po
o
i
__
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
+
f
i
L
po
o
v
i
. (1.929)
Now examining the dimensionless groups, we see that
k
LR
o
v
o
=
k
c
p
c
p
R
1
L
o
v
o
=
k
c
p
c
p
c
p
c
v
o
v
o
L
=
1
Pr
1
1
Re
. (1.930)
Here we have a new dimensionless group, the Prandtl
47
number, Pr, where
Pr
c
p
k
=
o
k
ocp
=
momentum diusivity
energy diusivity
=

. (1.931)
We also see that
f
i
L
po
o
=
gL g
i
po
o
=
v
2
o
po
o
gL
v
2
o
g
i
=
M
2
o
Fr
2
g
i
, (1.932)
v
2
o
po
o
= M
2
o
, (1.933)
2v
2
o
L
2
L
o
v
o
1
po
o
=
2
o
v
o
L
v
2
o
po
o
= 2
1
Re
M
2
o
. (1.934)
47
Ludwig Prandtl, 1875-1953, German mechanician and father of aerodynamics, primarily worked at Uni-
versity of Gottingen, discoverer of the boundary layer, pioneer of dirigibles, and advocate of monoplanes.
So, the dimensionless energy equation becomes
o
_
_
e
+
1
2
M
2
o
v
j
v
j
__
+
i
_
v
i
_
e
+
1
2
M
2
o
v
j
v
j
__
=

1
1
Pr
1
Re
i
T
i
(p
v
i
)
+2
M
2
o
Re
i
__
(i
v
j)
1
3
k
v
k
ij
_
v
j
_
+
M
2
o
Fr
2
g
i
v
i
. (1.935)
1.9.4 Thermal state equation
p
o
p
=
o
R
_
p
o
o
R
_
T
, (1.936)
p
. (1.937)
1.9.5 Caloric state equation
p
o
o
e
= c
v
_
p
o
o
R
_
T
+ e, (1.938)
e
=
c
v
R
T
+

o
e
p
o
, (1.939)
e
=
1
1
T
+

o
e
p
o
..
unimportant
(1.940)
For completeness, we retain the term
o e
po
. It actually plays no role in this non-reactive ow
since energy only enters via its derivatives. When ows with chemical reactions are modeled,
this term may be important.
1.9.6 Upstream conditions
Scaling the upstream conditions, we get
p
= 1,
= 1, v
i
= (1, 0, 0)
T
. (1.941)
With this we then get secondary relationships
T
= 1, e
=
1
1
+

o
e
p
o
. (1.942)
1.9.7 Reduction in parameters
We lastly note that our original system had the following ten independent parameters:
o
, p
o
, c
v
, R, L, v
o
, , k, f
i
, e. (1.943)
Our scaled system however has only six independent parameters:
Re, Pr, M
o
, Fr, ,

o
e
p
o
. (1.944)
Note we have lost no information, nor made any approximations, and we have a system with
fewer dependencies.
1.10 First integrals of linear momentum
Under special circumstances, we can integrate the linear momentum principle to obtain a
simplied equation. We will consider two cases here, what is known as Bernoullis
48
equation
and Croccos
49
equation. In a later chapter on rotational ows, we will also consider the
Helmholtz equation and Kelvins theorem, which are also rst integrals in special cases.
1.10.1 Bernoullis equation
What we commonly call Bernoullis equation is really a rst integral of the linear momenta
principle. Under dierent assumptions, we can get dierent avors of Bernoullis equation.
A rst integral of the linear momenta principle exists under the following conditions:
viscous stresses are negligible relative to other terms,
ij
0,
the uid is barotropic, p = p() or = (p).
body forces are conservative, so we can write f
i
=
i
, where

is a known potential
function, and
either
the ow is irrotational,
k
=
kij
i
v
j
= 0, or
the ow is steady,
o
= 0.
48
Daniel Bernoulli, 1700-1782, Dutch-born Swiss mathematician of the prolic and mathematical Bernoulli
family, son of Johann Bernoulli, studied at Heidelberg, Strasbourg, and Basel, receiving M.D. degree, served
in St. Petersburg and lectured at the University of Basel, put forth his uid mechanical principle in the 1738
Hydrodynamica, in competition with his fathers 1738 Hydraulica.
49
Luigi Crocco, 1909-1986, Sicilian-born, Italian applied mathematician and theoretical aerodynamicist
and rocket engineer, taught at University of Rome, Princeton, and Paris.
1.10. FIRST INTEGRALS OF LINEAR MOMENTUM 151
First consider a version of the general linear momenta equation in non-conservative form,
Eq. (1.468) scaled by :
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
=
1
i
p + f
i
+
1
ji
. (1.945)
Now use our vector identity, Eq. (1.171), to rewrite the advective term, and impose our
assumptions above to arrive at
o
v
i
+
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
=
1
i
p
i
. (1.946)
Now let us dene, just for this particular analysis, a new function . We will take to
be a function of pressure p, and thus implicitly, a function of x
i
and t. For the barotropic
uid, we dene as
(p(x
i
, t))
_
p(x
i
,t)
po
d p
( p)
. (1.947)
Note that in the special case of incompressible ow that = p/. Recalling Leibnizs rule,
d
dt
_
x=b(t)
x=a(t)
f(x, t) dx =
_
x=b(t)
x=a(t)
f
t
dx +
db
dt
f(b(t), t)
da
dt
f(a(t), t), (1.948)
we let /x
i
play the role of d/dt to get
x
i
=

x
i
_
p(x
i
,t)
po
d p
( p)
=
1
(p(x
i
, t))
p
x
i
1
(p
o
)
p
o
x
i
..
=0
+
_
p(x
i
,t)
po
x
i
_
1
( p)
_
. .
=0
d p. (1.949)
As p
o
is constant, and the integrand has no explicit dependency on x
i
, we get
x
i
=
1
(p(x
i
, t))
p
x
i
. (1.950)
So, our linear momenta principle reduces to
o
v
i
+
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
=
i
. (1.951)
Consider now some special cases:
1.10.1.1 Irrotational case
If the uid is irrotational, we have
k
=
klm
l
v
m
= 0. Consequently, we can write the
velocity vector as the gradient of a potential function , known as the velocity potential:
m
= v
m
. (1.952)
Note that if the velocity takes this form, then the vorticity is
k
=
klm
m
. (1.953)
Since
klm
is anti-symmetric and
l
m
is symmetric, their tensor inner product must be zero;
hence, such a ow is irrotational:
k
=
klm
m
= 0. So, the linear momenta principle,
Eq. (1.951), reduces to
i
+
i
_
1
2
(
j
)(
j
)
_
=
i
, (1.954)
i
_
o
+
1
2
(
j
)(
j
) + +

_
= 0, (1.955)
o
+
1
2
(
j
)(
j
) + +

= f(t). (1.956)
Here f(t) is an arbitrary function of time, which can be chosen to match conditions in a
given problem.
1.10.1.2 Steady case
1.10.1.2.1 Streamline integration Here we take
o
= 0, but
k
= 0. Rearranging the
steady version of the linear momenta equation, Eq. (1.951), we get
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
+
i
+
i
=
ijk
v
j
k
, (1.957)
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

_
=
ijk
v
j
k
. (1.958)
Taking the inner product of both sides with v
i
, we get
v
i
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

_
= v
i
ijk
v
j
k
, (1.959)
=
ijk
v
i
v
j
. .
=0
k
, (1.960)
= 0. (1.961)
The term on the right hand side is zero because it is the tensor inner product of a symmetric
and anti-symmetric tensor.
For a local coordinate system which has component s aligned with the velocity vector v
i
,
and the other two directions n, and b, mutually orthogonal, we have v
i
= (v
s
, 0, 0)
T
. Our
linear momenta principle then reduces to
(v
s
, 0, 0)
_
_
s
[]
n
[]
b
[]
_
_
= 0. (1.962)
Forming this dot product yields
v
s
s
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

_
= 0. (1.963)
For v
s
= 0, we get that
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

= C(n, b). (1.964)
On a particular streamline, the function C(n, b) will be a constant.
1.10.1.2.2 Lamb surfaces We can extend the idea of integration along a streamline to
describe what are known as Lamb surfaces
50
by again considering the steady, inviscid linear
momentum principle with conservative body forces, Eq. (1.958):
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

_
=
ijk
v
j
k
. (1.965)
Now taking the quantity B to be
B
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

, (1.966)
the linear momentum principle, Eq. (1.958), becomes
i
B =
ijk
v
j
k
(1.967)
Now the vector
ijk
v
j
k
is orthogonal to both velocity v
j
and vorticity
k
because of the
nature of the cross product. Also the vector
i
B is orthogonal to a surface on which B
is constant. Consequently, the surface on which B is constant must be tangent to both
the velocity and vorticity vectors. Surfaces of constant B thus are composed of families of
streamlines on which the Bernoulli constant has the same value. In addition they contain
families of vortex lines. These are the Lamb surfaces of the ow, named after Sir Horace
Lamb, the British uid mechanician of the late 19th and early 20th century.
1.10.1.3 Irrotational, steady, incompressible case
In this case, we recover the form most commonly used (and misused) of Bernoullis equation,
namely,
1
2
v
j
v
j
+ +

= C. (1.968)
The constant is truly constant throughout the ow eld. With = p/ here and

= g
z
z
(with g
z
> 0, and rising z corresponding to rising distance from the earths surface, we get
50
Sir Horace Lamb, 1849-1934, English uid mechanician, rst studied at Owens College Manchester fol-
lowed by mathematics at Cambridge, taught at Adelaide, Australia, then returned to the University of
Manchester, prolic writer of textbooks.
f =
= g
z
k) for a constant gravitational eld, and v the magnitude of the velocity
vector, we get
1
2
v
2
+
p
+ g
z
z = C. (1.969)
1.10.2 Croccos theorem
It is common, especially in texts on compressible ow, to present what is known as Croccos
theorem. The many dierent versions presented in many standard texts are non-uniform and
often of unclear validity. Its utility is conned mainly to providing an alternative way of
expressing the linear momentum principle which provides some insight into the factors which
inuence uid motion. In special cases, it can be integrated to form a more useful relation-
ship, similar to Bernoullis equation, between fundamental uid variables. The heredity of
this theorem is not always clear, though, as we shall see it is nothing more than a combina-
tion of the linear momentum principle coupled with some denitions from thermodynamics.
Its derivation is often conned to inviscid ows. Here we will rst present a result valid
for general viscous ows for the evolution of stagnation enthalpy, which is closely related to
Croccos theorem. Next we will show how one of the restrictions can be relaxed so as to
obtain what we call the extended Croccos theorem. We then show how this reduces to a
form which is similar to a form presented in many texts.
1.10.2.1 Stagnation enthalpy variation
First again consider the general linear momenta equation, Eq. (1.945):
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
=
1
i
p + f
i
+
1
ji
. (1.970)
Now, as before in the development of Bernoullis equation, use our vector identity, Eq. (1.171),
to rewrite the advective term, but retain the viscous terms to get
o
v
i
+
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
=
1
i
p + f
i
+
1
ji
. (1.971)
Taking the dot product with v
i
, and rearranging, we get
o
_
1
2
v
i
v
i
_
+ v
i
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
=
ijk
v
i
v
j
. .
=0
v
i
i
p + v
i
f
i
+
1
v
i
ji
. (1.972)
Again, since
ijk
is anti-symmetric and v
i
v
j
is symmetric, their tensor inner product is zero,
so we get
o
_
1
2
v
i
v
i
_
+ v
i
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
=
1
v
i
i
p + v
i
f
i
+
1
v
i
ji
. (1.973)
Now recall the Gibbs relation from thermodynamics, Eq. (1.529):
Tds = de
p
2
d. (1.974)
Also recall the denition of enthalpy h, Eq. (1.519):
h = e +
p
. (1.975)
Dierentiating the equation for enthalpy, we recover Eq. (1.522):
dh = de +
1
dp
p
2
d. (1.976)
Eliminating de in favor of dh in the Gibbs equation gives
Tds = dh
1
dp. (1.977)
If we choose to apply this relation to the motion following a uid particle, we can say then
that
T
ds
dt
=
dh
dt

1
dp
dt
. (1.978)
Expanding, we get
T(
o
s + v
i
i
s) =
o
h + v
i
i
h
1
(
o
p + v
i
i
p). (1.979)
Rearranging, we get
T(
o
s + v
i
i
s) (
o
h + v
i
i
h) +
1
o
p =
1
v
i
i
p. (1.980)
We then use the above identity to eliminate the pressure gradient term from the linear
momentum equation in favor of enthalpy, entropy, and unsteady pressure terms:
o
_
1
2
v
i
v
i
_
+v
i
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
= T(
o
s+v
i
i
s) (
o
h+v
i
i
h) +
1
o
p+v
i
f
i
+
1
v
i
ji
. (1.981)
Rearranging slightly, noting that v
i
v
i
= v
j
v
j
, and assuming the body force is conservative so
that f
i
=
i
, we get
o
_
h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

_
+ v
i
i
_
h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

_
= T (
o
s + v
i
i
s) +
1
o
p +
1
v
i
ji
. (1.982)
Note that here we have made the common assumption that the body force potential

is
independent of time, which allows us to absorb it within the time derivative. If we dene,
as is common, the total enthalpy h
o
as
h
o
= h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

, (1.983)
we can then state
o
h
o
+ v
i
i
h
o
= T (
o
s + v
i
i
s) +
1
o
p +
1
v
i
ji
, (1.984)
dh
o
dt
= T
ds
dt
+
1
p
t
+
1
v
T
T

_
T
(1.985)
We can use the rst law of thermodynamics written in terms of entropy, Eq. (1.533),
(ds/dt) = (1/T)
i
q
i
+ (1/T)
ij
i
v
j
, to eliminate the entropy derivative in favor of those
terms which generate entropy to arrive at
dh
o
dt
=
i
(
ij
v
j
q
i
) +
o
p. (1.986)
Thus, we see that the total enthalpy of a uid particle is inuenced by energy and momentum
diusion as well as an unsteady pressure eld.
1.10.2.2 Extended Croccos theorem
With a slight modication of the preceding analysis, we can arrive at the extended Croccos
theorem. Begin once more with an earlier version of the linear momenta principle:
o
v
i
+
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
=
1
i
p + f
i
+
1
ji
. (1.987)
Now assume we have a functional representation of enthalpy in the form
h = h(s, p). (1.988)
Then we get
dh =
h
s
p
ds +
h
p
s
dp. (1.989)
We also thus deduce from the Gibbs relation dh = Tds + (1/)dp that
h
s
p
= T,
h
p
s
=
1
. (1.990)
Now, since we have h = h(s, p), we can take its derivative with respect to each and all of the
coordinate directions to obtain
h
x
i
=
h
s
p
s
x
i
+
h
p
s
p
x
i
. (1.991)
or
i
h =
h
s
i
s +
h
p
i
p. (1.992)
Substituting known values for the thermodynamic derivatives, we get
i
h = T
i
s +
1
i
p. (1.993)
We can use this to eliminate directly the pressure gradient term from the linear momentum
equation to obtain then
o
v
i
+
i
_
1
2
v
j
v
j
_
ijk
v
j
k
= T
i
s
i
h + f
i
+
1
ji
. (1.994)
Rearranging slightly, and again assuming the body force is conservative so that f
i
=
i
,
we get the extended Croccos theorem:
o
v
i
+
i
_
h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

_
= T
i
s +
ijk
v
j
k
+
1
ji
. (1.995)
Again, employing the total enthalpy, h
o
= h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

, we write the extended Croccos
theorem as
o
v
i
+
i
h
o
= T
i
s +
ijk
v
j
k
+
1
ji
. (1.996)
1.10.2.3 Traditional Croccos theorem
For a steady, inviscid ow, the extended Croccos theorem reduces to what is usually called
Croccos theorem:
i
h
o
= T
i
s +
ijk
v
j
k
, (1.997)
h
o
= Ts +v . (1.998)
If the ow is further required to be homeoentropic, we get
i
h
o
=
ijk
v
j
k
. (1.999)
Similar to Lamb surfaces, we nd that surfaces on which h
o
is constant are parallel to both
the velocity and vorticity vector elds. Taking the dot product with v
i
, we get
v
i
i
h
o
= v
i
ijk
v
j
k
, (1.1000)
=
ijk
v
i
v
j
k
, (1.1001)
= 0. (1.1002)
Integrating this along a streamline, as for Bernoullis equation, we nd
h
o
= C(n, b), (1.1003)
h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

= C(n, b), (1.1004)
so we see that the stagnation enthalpy is constant along a streamline and varies from stream-
line to streamline. If the ow is steady, homeoentropic, and irrotational, the total enthalpy
will be constant throughout the ow-eld:
h +
1
2
v
j
v
j
+

= C. (1.1005)
Chapter 2
Vortex dynamics
see Panton, Chapter 13,
see Yih, Chapter 2.
In this chapter we will consider in detail the kinematics and dynamics of rotating uids,
sometimes called vortex dynamics. The two most common quantities which are used to
characterize rotating uids are
the vorticity vector = v, and
the circulation =
_
C
v
T
dr.
Both will be important in this chapter.
Although it is entirely possible to use Cartesian index notation to describe a rotating
uid, some of the ideas are better conveyed in a non-Cartesian system, such as the cylindrical
coordinate system. For that reason, and for the sake of giving the student more experience
with the other common notation, the Gibbs notation will often be used in the chapter.
2.1 Transformations to cylindrical coordinates
The rotation of a uid about an axis induces an acceleration in that a uid particles velocity
vector is certainly changing with respect to time. Such a motion is most easily described
with a set of cylindrical coordinates. The transformation and inverse transformation to and
from cylindrical (r, , z) coordinates to Cartesian (x, y, z) is given by the familiar
x = r cos , r =
_
x
2
+ y
2
, (2.1)
y = r sin , = tan
1
_
y
x
_
, (2.2)
z = z, z = z. (2.3)
Most of the basic distinctions between the two systems can be understood by considering two-
dimensional geometries. The representation of an arbitrary point in both two-dimensional
159
160 CHAPTER 2. VORTEX DYNAMICS
x
y
i
j
e
r
e
r
Figure 2.1: Representation of a point in Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates along with
unit vectors for both systems.
(x, y) Cartesian and two-dimensional (r, ) cylindrical coordinate systems along with the
unit basis vectors for both systems, i, j, and e
r
, e
, is sketched in Figure 2.1,

2.1.1 Centripetal and Coriolis acceleration
The fact that a point in motion is accompanied by changes in the basis vectors with respect
to time in the cylindrical representation, but not for Cartesian basis vectors, accounts for
the most striking dierences in the formulations of the governing equations, namely the
appearance of
centripetal acceleration, and
Coriolis
1
acceleration
in the cylindrical representation.
Consider the representations of the velocity vector v in both coordinate systems:
v = ui + vj, or (2.4)
v = v
r
e
r
+ v
. (2.5)
Now the unsteady (as opposed to the convective) part of the acceleration vector of a particle
is simply the partial derivative of the velocity vector with respect to time. Now formally, we
must allow for variations of the unit basis vectors as well as the components themselves so
1
Gaspard Gustave de Coriolis, 1792-1843, Paris-born mathematician, taught with Navier, introduced the
terms work and kinetic energy with modern scientic meaning, wrote on the mathematical theory of
billiards.
2.1. TRANSFORMATIONS TO CYLINDRICAL COORDINATES 161
cos i
e
r
sin j
cos j
e
sin i
Figure 2.2: Geometrical representation of cylindrical unit vectors in terms of Cartesian unit
vectors.
that
v
t
=
u
t
i + u
i
t
..
=0
+
v
t
j + v
j
t
..
=0
, (2.6)
v
t
=
v
r
t
e
r
+ v
r
e
r
t
+
v
t
e
+ v
t
. (2.7)
Now the time derivatives of the Cartesian basis vectors is zero, as they are dened not to
change with the position of the particle. Hence for a Cartesian representation, we have for
the unsteady component of acceleration the familiar:
v
t
=
u
t
i +
v
t
j. (2.8)
However the time derivative of the cylindrical basis vectors does change with time for
particles in motion! To see this, let us rst relate e
r
and e
to i and j. From the sketch of

Figure 2.2, it is clear that
e
r
= cos i + sin j, (2.9)
e
= sin i + cos j. (2.10)

This is a linear system of equations. We can use Cramers rule to invert to nd
i = cos e
r
sin e
, (2.11)
j = sin e
r
+ cos e
. (2.12)
Now, examining time derivatives of the unit vectors, we see that
e
r
t
= sin
t
i + cos
t
j, (2.13)
=

t
e
, (2.14)
and
e
t
= cos
t
i sin
t
j, (2.15)
=
t
e
r
. (2.16)
v dt = ds
r
d
Figure 2.3: Sketch of relation of dierential distance ds to velocity in angular direction v
.
so there is a formal variation of the unit vectors with respect to time as long as the angular
velocity

t
= 0. So the acceleration vector is
v
t
=
v
r
t
e
r
+ v
r
t
e
+
v
t
e
t
e
r
, (2.17)
=
_
v
r
t
v
t
_
e
r
+
_
v
t
+ v
r
t
_
e
. (2.18)
Now from basic geometry, as sketched in Figure 2.3, we have
ds = rd, (2.19)
v
dt = rd, (2.20)
v
r
=

t
. (2.21)
Consequently, we can write the unsteady component of acceleration as
v
t
=
_
_
_
_
v
r
t

v
2
r
..
centripetal
_
_
_
_
e
r
+
_
_
_
v
t
+
v
r
v
r
..
Coriolis
_
_
_
e
. (2.22)
Two, apparently new, accelerations have appeared as a consequence of the transformation:
centripetal acceleration,
v
2
r
, directed towards the center, and Coriolis acceleration,
vrv
r
,
directed in the direction of increasing . These terms do not have explicit dependency on
time derivatives of velocity. And yet when the equations are constructed in this coordinate
system, they represent real accelerations, and are consequences of forces. As can be seen
by considering the general theory of non-orthogonal coordinate transformations, terms like
the centripetal and Coriolis acceleration are associated with the Christoel symbols of the
transformation.
Such terms perhaps contributed to the development of Einsteins theory of general rel-
ativity as well. Refusing to accept that our typical expression of a body force, mg, was
fundamental, Einstein instead postulated that it was a term which was a relic of a coordinate
transformation. He held that we in fact exist in a more complex geometry than classically
considered. He constructed his theory of general relativity such that no gravitational force
exists, but when coordinate transformations are employed to give us a classical view of the
non-relativistic universe, the term mg appears in much the same way as centripetal and
Coriolis accelerations appear when we transform to cylindrical coordinates.
2.1.2 Grad and div for cylindrical systems
We can use the chain rule to develop expressions for grad and div in cylindrical coordinate
systems. Consider the Cartesian
=

x
i +

y
j +

z
k. (2.23)
The chain rule gives us
x
=
r
x
r
+

x
+
z
x
z
, (2.24)
y
=
r
y
r
+

y
+
z
y
z
, (2.25)
z
=
r
z
r
+

z
+
z
z
z
, (2.26)
(2.27)
Now, we have
r
x
=
2x
2
_
x
2
+ y
2
=
x
r
= cos , (2.28)
r
y
=
2y
2
_
x
2
+ y
2
=
y
r
= sin , (2.29)
r
z
= 0, (2.30)
and
x
=
y
x
2
+ y
2
=
r sin
r
2
=
sin
r
, (2.31)
y
=
x
x
2
+ y
2
=
r cos
r
2
=
cos
r
, (2.32)
z
= 0, (2.33)
and
z
x
= 0, (2.34)
z
y
= 0, (2.35)
z
z
= 1, (2.36)
so
x
= cos

r

sin
r
, (2.37)
y
= sin

r
+
cos
r
, (2.38)
z
=

z
. (2.39)
2.1.2.1 Grad
So now we are prepared to write an explicit form for in cylindrical coordinates:
=
_
cos

r

sin
r
_
. .
x
(cos e
r
sin e
)
. .
i
+
_
sin

r
+
cos
r
_
. .
y
(sin e
r
+ cos e
)
. .
j
+

z
e
z
, (2.40)
=
_
_
cos
2
+ sin
2
_

r
+
_
sin cos
r
+
sin cos
r
_

_
e
r
+
_
(sin cos + sin cos )

r
+
_
sin
2
r
+
cos
2
r
_

_
e
+

z
e
z
, (2.41)
=

r
e
r
+
1
r
+

z
e
z
. (2.42)
We can now write a simple expression for the convective component, v
T
, of the acceleration
vector:
v
T
= v
r
r
+
v
+ v
z
z
. (2.43)
2.1.2.2 Div
The divergence is straightforward. In Cartesian coordinates we have
T
v =
u
x
+
v
y
+
w
z
. (2.44)
In cylindrical, we replace derivatives with respect to x, y, z with those with respect to r, , z,
so
T
v = cos
u
r

sin
r
u
+ sin
v
r
+
cos
r
v
+
w
z
. (2.45)
Now u, v and w transform in the same way as x, y, and z, so
u = v
r
cos v
sin , (2.46)
v = v
r
sin + v
cos , (2.47)
w = v
z
. (2.48)
Substituting and taking partials, we nd that
T
v = cos
_
_
_
cos
v
r
r
sin
v
r
. .
A
_
_
_
sin
r
_
_
_
cos
v
r
. .
B
sin v
r
sin
v
cos v
. .
C
_
_
_
+sin
_
_
_
sin
v
r
r
+ cos
v
r
. .
A
_
_
_
+
cos
r
_
_
_
sin
v
r
. .
B
+cos v
r
+ cos
v
sin v
. .
C
_
_
_
+
v
z
z
. (2.49)
When expanded, the terms labeled A, B, and C cancel in the above expression. Then using
the trigonometric identity sin
2
+ cos
2
= 1, we arrive at the simple form
T
v =
v
r
r
+
v
r
r
+
1
r
v
+
v
z
z
, (2.50)
which is often rewritten as
T
v =
1
r
r
(rv
r
) +
1
r
v
+
v
z
z
. (2.51)
Using the same procedure, we can show that the Laplacian operator transforms to
2
=
1
r
r
_
r

r
_
+
1
r
2
2
+

2
z
2
. (2.52)
2.1.3 Incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coor-
dinates
Leaving out some additional details of the transformations, we nd that the incompressible
Navier-Stokes equations for a Newtonian uid with constant viscosity and body force conned
to the z direction are
0 =
1
r
r
(rv
r
) +
1
r
v
+
v
z
z
, (2.53)
_
v
r
t

v
2
r
_
+ v
r
v
r
r
+
v
r
v
r
+ v
z
v
r
z
=
1
p
r
+
_
2
v
r
v
2
r
r
2

2
r
2
v
_
,(2.54)
_
v
t
+
v
r
v
r
_
+ v
r
v
r
+
v
r
v
+ v
z
v
z
=
1
1
r
p
+
_
2
v
+
2
r
2
v
r
r
2
_
, (2.55)
v
z
t
+ v
r
v
z
r
+
v
r
v
z
+ v
z
v
z
z
=
1
p
z
+
2
v
z
g
z
. (2.56)
Note that in the acceleration terms, strictly unsteady terms, convective terms as well as
centripetal and Coriolis terms appear. Also note that the viscous terms have additional
complications that we have not considered in detail but arise because we must transform
2
v, and there are many non-intuitive terms which arise here when expanded in full.
2.2 Ideal rotational vortex
Let us consider the kinematics and dynamics of an ideal rotational vortex, which we dene
to be a uid rotating as a solid body. Let us assume incompressible ow, so
T
v = 0,
assume a simple velocity eld, and ask what forces could have given rise to that velocity
eld. We will simply use z for the azimuthal coordinate instead of z here. Take
v
r
= 0, v
=
r
2
, v
z
= 0. (2.57)
The kinematics of this ow are simple and sketched in Figure 2.4, Here is now dened as
a constant. The velocity is zero at the origin and grows in amplitude with linear distance
from the origin. The ow is steady, and the streamlines are circles centered about the origin.
Obviously, as r , the theory of relativity would suggest that such a ow would break
down as the velocity approached the speed of light. In fact, one would nd as well that as the
velocities approached the sound speed that compressibility eects would become important
far before relativistic eects.
Whatever the case, does this assumed velocity eld satisfy incompressible mass conser-
vation?
1
r
r
(r(0)) +
1
r
_
r
2
_
. .
=0
+

z
(0)
?
..
= 0. (2.58)
2.2. IDEAL ROTATIONAL VORTEX 167
x
y
Figure 2.4: Sketch of a uid rotating as a pure solid body.
Obviously it does.
Next let us consider the acceleration of an element of uid and the forces which could
give rise to that acceleration. First consider the material derivative for this ow
d
dt
=

t
..
=0
+ v
r
..
=0
r
+
v
+ v
z
..
=0
z
=
v
. (2.59)
But the only non-zero component of velocity, v
, has no dependency on , so the material

derivative of velocity
dv
dt
= 0.
Consider now the viscous terms for this ow. We recall for an incompressible Newtonian
uid that
ij
= 2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
..
=0
ij
, (2.60)
= (
i
v
j
+
j
v
i
) , (2.61)
ij
= (
j
i
v
j
+
j
j
v
i
) , (2.62)
=
_
_
i

j
v
j
..
=0
+
j
j
v
i
_
_
, (2.63)
=
2
v (2.64)
We also note that
=
ijk
k
=
ijk
kmn
m
v
n
, (2.65)
=
kij
kmn
m
v
n
, (2.66)
= (
im
jn
in
jm
)
j
m
v
n
, (2.67)
=
j
i
v
j
j
v
i
, (2.68)
=
i

j
v
j
..
=0
j
v
i
, (2.69)
=
j
j
v
i
. (2.70)
Comparing, we see that for this incompressible ow,
_
T

T
_
T
= (). (2.71)
Now, using relations that can be developed for the curl in cylindrical coordinates, we have
for this ow that
r
=
1
r
v
z
z
= 0, (2.72)
=
v
r
z

v
z
r
= 0, (2.73)
z
=
1
r
r
(rv
)
1
r
v
r
, (2.74)
=
1
r
r
_
r
r
2
_
, (2.75)
= . (2.76)
So the ow has a constant rotation rate, . Since it is constant, its curl is zero, and we have
for this ow that
_
T

T
_
T
= 0. We could just as well show for this ow that = 0. That
is because the kinematics are those of pure rotation as a solid body with no deformation.
No deformation implies no viscous stress.
Hence, the three linear momenta equations in the cylindrical coordinate system reduce
to the following:
v
2
r
=
1
p
r
, (2.77)
0 =
1
1
r
p
, (2.78)
0 =
1
p
z
g
z
. (2.79)
The r momentum equation strikes a balance between centripetal inertia and radial pressure
gradients. The momentum equation shows that as there is no acceleration in this direction,
there can be no net pressure force to induce it. The z momentum equation enforces a balance
between pressure forces and gravitational body forces.
2.2. IDEAL ROTATIONAL VORTEX 169
If we take p = p(r, , z) and p(r
o
, , z
o
) = p
o
, then
dp =
p
r
dr +
p
d +
p
z
dz, (2.80)
=
v
2
r
dr + 0d g
z
dz, (2.81)
=

2
r
2
4r
dr g
z
dz, (2.82)
=

2
r
4
dr g
z
dz, (2.83)
p p
o
=

2
8
(r
2
r
2
o
) g
z
(z z
o
), (2.84)
p(r, z) = p
o
+

2
8
(r
2
r
2
o
) g
z
(z z
o
). (2.85)
Now on a surface of constant pressure we have p(r, z) = p. So
p = p
o
+

2
8
(r
2
r
2
o
) g
z
(z z
o
), (2.86)
g
z
(z z
o
) = p
o
p +

2
8
(r
2
r
2
o
), (2.87)
z = z
o
+
p
o
p
g
z
+

2
8g
z
(r
2
r
2
o
). (2.88)
So a surface of constant pressure is a parabola in r with a minimum at r = 0. This is
consistent with what one observes upon spinning a bucket of water.
Now lets rearrange our general equation for the pressure eld and eliminate using
v
=
r
2
and dening v
o
=
ro
2
:
p
1
2
v
2
+ g
z
z = p
o
1
2
v
2
o
+ g
z
z
o
= C. (2.89)
This looks very similar to the steady irrotational incompressible Bernoulli equation in which
p +
1
2
v
2
+g
z
z = K. But there is a dierence in the sign on one of the terms. Now add v
2
to both sides of the equation to get

p +
1
2
v
2
+ g
z
z = C + v
2
. (2.90)
Now since v
=
r
2
,v
r
= 0, we have lines of constant r as streamlines, and v
is constant on
those streamlines, so that we get
p +
1
2
v
2
+ g
z
z = C
, on a streamline. (2.91)
Here C
varies from streamline to streamline.

x
2
x
1
dr = a d e
Figure 2.5: Sketch of an ideal irrotational point vortex.

We lastly note that the circulation for this system depends on position. If we choose our
contour integral to be a circle of radius a about the origin we nd
=
_
C
v
T
dr, (2.92)
=
_
2
0
_
1
2
a
_
(ad), (2.93)
= a
2
. (2.94)
2.3 Ideal irrotational vortex
Now let us perform a similar analysis for the following velocity eld:
v
r
= 0, v
=

o
2r
, v
z
= 0. (2.95)
The kinematics of this ow are also simple and sketched in Figure 2.5, We see once again
that the streamlines are circles about the origin. But here, as opposed to the ideal rotational
vortex, v
0 as r and v
as r 0. The vorticity vector of this ow is
r
=
1
r
v
z
z
= 0, (2.96)
=
v
r
z

v
z
r
= 0, (2.97)
z
=
1
r
r
(rv
)
1
r
v
r
, (2.98)
2.3. IDEAL IRROTATIONAL VORTEX 171
=
1
r
r
_
r

o
2r
_
, (2.99)
=
1
r
r
_
o
2
_
= 0! (2.100)
This ow eld, which seems the epitome of a rotating ow, is formally irrotational as it
has zero vorticity. What is happening is that a uid element not at the origin is actually
undergoing severe deformation as it rotates about the origin; however, it does not rotate
about its own center of mass. Therefore, the vorticity vector is zero, except at the origin,
where it is undened.
The circulation for this ow about a circle of radius a is
=
_
C
v
T
dr, (2.101)
=
_
2
0
v
(ad), (2.102)
=
_
2
0
o
2a
ad, (2.103)
=
o
. (2.104)
So the circulation is independent of the radius of the closed contour. In fact it can be shown
that as long as the closed contour includes the origin in its interior that any closed contour
will have this same circulation. We call
o
the ideal irrotational vortex strength, in that it
is proportional to the magnitude of the velocity at any radius.
Let us once again consider the forces which could induce the motion of this vortex if the
ow happens to be incompressible with constant properties and in a potential eld where the
gravitational body force per unit mass is g
z
k. Recall again that
_
T

_
T
= (),
and that since = 0 that
_
T

_
T
= 0 for this ow. Note also that because there is
deformation here, that itself is not zero, its divergence is. For example, if we consider
one component of viscous stress
r
and use standard relations which can be derived for
incompressible Newtonian uids, we nd that
r
=
_
r

r
_
v
r
_
+
1
r
v
r
_
= r

r
_

o
2r
2
_
=
o
r
2
. (2.105)
The equations of motion reduce to the same ones as for the ideal rotational vortex:
v
2
r
=
1
p
r
, (2.106)
0 =
1
1
r
p
, (2.107)
0 =
1
p
z
g
z
. (2.108)
Once more we can deduce a pressure eld which is consistent with these and the same set
of conditions at r = r
o
, z = z
o
, with p = p
o
:
dp =
p
r
dr +
p
..
=0
d +
p
z
dz, (2.109)
=
v
2
r
dr g
z
dz, (2.110)
=

2
o
4
2
dr
r
3
g
z
dz, (2.111)
p p
o
=
2
o
8
2
_
1
r
2

1
r
2
o
_
g
z
(z z
o
), (2.112)
p +

2
o
8
2
1
r
2
+ g
z
z = p
o
+

2
o
8
2
1
r
2
o
+ g
z
z
o
, (2.113)
p +
1
2
v
2
+ g
z
z = p
o
+
1
2
v
2
o
+ g
z
z
o
= C (2.114)
(2.115)
This is once again Bernoullis equation. Here it is for an irrotational ow eld that is also
time-independent, so the Bernoulli constant C is truly constant for the entire ow eld and
not just along a streamline.
On isobars we have p = p which gives us
p p
o
=
2
o
8
2
_
1
r
2

1
r
2
o
_
g
z
(z z
o
), (2.116)
z = z
o
+
p
o
p
g
z
+

2
o
8
2
g
z
_
1
r
2

1
r
2
o
_
(2.117)
Note that the pressure goes to negative innity at the origin. One can show that actual
forces, obtained by integrating pressure over area, are in fact bounded.
2.4 Helmholtz vorticity transport equation
Here we will take the curl of the linear momenta principle to obtain a relationship, the
Helmholtz vorticity transport equation, which shows how the vorticity eld evolves in a
general uid.
2.4.1 General development
First, we recall some useful vector identities:
(v
T
)v =
_
v
T
v
2
_
+ v, (2.118)
2.4. HELMHOLTZ VORTICITY TRANSPORT EQUATION 173
(a b) = (b
T
)a (a
T
)b +a(
T
b) b(
T
a), (2.119)
() = 0, (2.120)
T
(v) =
T
= 0. (2.121)
The rst is Eq. (1.171); the others are easily proved.
We start now with the linear momenta principle for a general uid:
v
t
+ (v
T
)v = f
1
p +
1
T

_
T
. (2.122)
We expand the term (v
T
)v and then apply the curl operator to both sides to get
_
v
t
+
_
v
T
v
2
_
+ v
_
=
_
f
1
p +
1
T

_
T
_
. (2.123)
This becomes, via the linearity of the various operators,
t
(v
. .
)+
_
_
v
T
v
2
__
. .
=0
+v = f
_
1
p
_
+
_
1
T

_
T
_
.
(2.124)
Using our vector identity for the term with two cross products we get
t
+ (v
T
)
. .
=
d
dt
(
T
)v+(
T
v
. .
=
1
d
dt
)v(
T

. .
=0
) = f
_
1
p
_
+
_
1
T

_
T
_
.
(2.125)
Rearranging, we have
d
dt

d
dt
= (
T
)v + f
_
1
p
_
+
_
1
T

_
T
_
, (2.126)
1
d
dt

2
d
dt
=
_

_
v +
1
f
1
_
1
p
_
+
1
_
1
T

_
T
_
, (2.127)
d
dt
_
_
=
_

_
v +
1
f
1
_
1
p
_
+
1
_
1
T

_
T
_
, (2.128)
Now consider the term
_
1
p
_
. In Einstein notation, we have
ijk
j
_
1
k
p
_
=
ijk
_
1
k
p
1
2
(
j
)(
k
p)
_
, (2.129)
=
1

ijk
k
p
. .
=0
ijk
(
j
)(
k
p), (2.130)
=
1
2
p. (2.131)
Multiplying both sides by , we write the nal general form of the vorticity transport equation
as
d
dt
_
_
=
_
T

_
v
. .
A
+f
. .
B
+
1
2
p
. .
C
+
_
1
T

_
T
_
. .
D
. (2.132)
Here we see the evolution of the vorticity scaled by the density is aected by four physical
processes, which we describe in greater detail directly, namely
A: bending and stretching of vortex tubes,
B: non-conservative body forces (if f =
, then f is conservative, and f =
= 0. For example f = g
z
k gives

= g
z
z),
C: non-barotropic, also known as baroclinic, eects (if a uid is barotropic, then
p = p() and p = (dp/d) thus p = (dp/d) = 0.), and
D: viscous eects.
2.4.2 Incompressible conservative body force limit
The Helmholtz vorticity transport equation (2.132) reduces signicantly in special limiting
cases involving incompressible ow in the limit of a conservative body force. In this limit
Eq. (2.132) reduces to the following
d
dt
= (
T
)v +
1
(
T
)
T
. (2.133)
2.4.2.1 Isotropic, Newtonian, constant viscosity
Now if we further require that the uid be isotropic and Newtonian with constant viscosity,
the viscous term can be written as
(
T
)
T
=
ijk
m
(2(
(m
v
k)
(1/3)
l
v
l
..
=0
mk
)), (2.134)
=
ijk
m
(
m
v
k
+
k
v
m
), (2.135)
=
ijk
j
(
m
m
v
k
+
m
k
v
m
), (2.136)
=
ijk
j
(
m
m
v
k
+
k

m
v
m
. .
=0
), (2.137)
=
m
ijk
j
v
k
. .
, (2.138)
=
2
. (2.139)
So we get, recalling that = /,
d
dt
= (
T
)v +
2
. (2.140)
2.4.2.2 Two-dimensional, isotropic, Newtonian, constant viscosity
If we further require two-dimensionality, then we have = (0, 0,
3
(x
1
, x
2
))
T
, and =
(
1
,
2
, 0)
T
, so
T
= 0. Thus, we get the very simple
d
3
dt
=
2
3
=
_
3
x
2
1
+

2
3
x
2
2
_
. (2.141)
If the ow is further inviscid = 0, we get
d
3
dt
= 0, (2.142)
and we nd that there is no tendency for vorticity to change along a streamline. If we further
have an initially irrotational state, then we get = 0 for all space and time.
2.4.3 Physical interpretations
Let us consider how two of the terms in Eq. (2.132) contribute to the generation of vorticity.
2.4.3.1 Baroclinic (non-barotropic) eects
If a uid is barotropic then we can write p = p(), or = (p). An isentropic calorically
perfect ideal gas has p/p
o
= (/
o
)
, where is the ratio of specic heats, and the o subscript

indicates a constant value. Such a gas is barotropic. for such a uid, we must have by the
chain rule that
i
p = (dp/d)
i
. Hence p and are vectors which point in the same
direction. Moreover, isobars (lines of constant pressure) must be parallel to isochores (lines
of constant density). If, as sketched in Figure 2.6. we calculate the resultant vector from the
net pressure force, as well as the center of mass for a nite uid volume, we would see that
the resultant force had no lever arm with the center of gravity. Hence it would generate no
torque, and no tendency for the uid element to rotate about its center of mass, hence no
vorticity would be generated by this force.
For a baroclinic uid, we do not have p = p(); hence, we must expect that p points
in a dierent direction than . If we examine this scenario, as sketched in Figure 2.7, we
discover that the resultant force from the pressure has a non-zero lever arm with the center
of mass of the uid element. Hence, it generates a torque, a tendency to rotate the uid
about G, and vorticity.
2.4.3.2 Bending and stretching of vortex tubes
Now let us consider generation of vorticity by three-dimensional eects. Such eects are
commonly characterized as the bending and stretching of what is known as vortex tubes.
Here we focus on just the following inviscid equation:
d
dt
= (
T
)v. (2.143)
G
low
p
low
high
p
high
F
net pressure
Figure 2.6: Isobars and isochores, center of mass G, and center of pressure for barotropic
uid.
G
low
p
low
high
p
high
F
net pressure
Figure 2.7: Isobars and isochores, center of mass G, and center of pressure for baroclinic
uid.
s
b
n
curve everywhere parallel
to vorticity vector
locally orthogonal
coordinate system
s,n,b
Figure 2.8: Local orthogonal intrinsic coordinate system oriented with local vorticity eld.
If we consider a coordinate system which is oriented with the vorticity eld as sketched in
Figure 2.8, we will get many simplications. We take the following directions
s: the streamwise direction parallel to the vorticity vector,
n: the principle normal direction, pointing towards the center of curvature,
b: the biorthogonal direction, orthogonal to s and n.
With this system, we can say that
(
T
)v =
_
_
(
s
0 0 )
_
_
b
_
_
_
_
v, (2.144)
=
s
v
s
. (2.145)
So for the inviscid ow we have
d
dt
=
s
v
s
. (2.146)
We have in terms of components
d
s
dt
=
s
v
s
s
, (2.147)
d
n
dt
=
s
v
n
s
, (2.148)
d
b
dt
=
s
v
b
s
. (2.149)
The term
vs
s
we know from kinematics represents a local stretching or extension. Just as
a rotating gure skater increases his or her angular velocity by concentrating his or her
mass about a vertical axis, so does a rotating uid. The rst of these expressions says that
the component of rotation aligned with the present increases if there is stretching in that
direction. This is sketched in Figure 2.9,
The second and third terms enforce that if v
n
or v
b
are changing in the s direction, when
accompanied by non-zero
s
, that changes in the non-aligned components of are induced.
stretched
vortex
tube
unstretched
vortex tube
Figure 2.9: Increase in vorticity due to stretching of vortex tube.
Hence the previously zero components
n
,
b
acquired non-zero values, and the lines parallel
to the vorticity vector bend. Hence, we have the term, bending of vortex tubes.
It is generally accepted that the bending and stretching of vortex tubes is an important
mechanism in the transition from laminar to turbulent ow.
2.5 Kelvins circulation theorem
Kelvins circulation theorem describes how the circulation of a material region in a uid
changes with time. We rst recall the denition of circulation :
=
_
C
v
T
dx, (2.150)
where C is a closed contour. We next take the material derivative of to get
d
dt
=
d
dt
_
C
v
T
dx, (2.151)
=
_
C
dv
T
dt
dx +
_
C
v
T
d
dt
dx, (2.152)
=
_
C
dv
T
dt
dx +
_
C
v
T
d
_
dx
dt
_
, (2.153)
=
_
C
dv
T
dt
dx +
_
C
v
T
dv, (2.154)
=
_
C
dv
T
dt
dx +
_
C
d
_
1
2
v
T
v
_
. .
=0
, (2.155)
=
_
C
_
dv
dt
_
T
dx. (2.156)
Here we note that because we have chosen a material region for our closed contour that
dx
dt
must be the uid particle velocity. This then allows us to write the second term as a perfect
2.6. POTENTIAL FLOW OF IDEAL POINT VORTICES 179
dierential, which integrates over the closed contour to be zero. We continue now by using
the linear momentum principle to replace the particle acceleration with density-scaled forces
to arrive at
d
dt
=
_
C
_
f
1
p +
1
T

_
T
_
T
dx. (2.157)
If now the uid is inviscid ( = 0), the body force is conservative (f =
), and the uid

is barotropic ((1/)p = ), then we have
d
dt
=
_
C
_

_
T
dx, (2.158)
=
_
C
T
_
+
_
dx, (2.159)
=
_
C
d
_
+
_
. .
=0
. (2.160)
The integral on the right hand side is zero because the contour is closed; hence, the integral
is path independent. Consequently, we arrive at the common version of Kelvins circula-
tion theorem which holds that for a uid which is inviscid, barotropic, and subjected to
conservative body forces, the circulation following a material region does not change with
time:
d
dt
= 0. (2.161)
Note that this is very similar to the Helmholtz equation, which, when we make the
additional stipulation of two-dimensionality and incompressibility, gives d/dt = 0. This is
not surprising as the vorticity is closely linked to the circulation via Stokes theorem, which
states
=
_
C
v
T
dx =
_
A
(v)
T
ndA =
_
A
T
ndA. (2.162)
2.6 Potential ow of ideal point vortices
Consider the uid motion induced by the simultaneous interaction of a family of ideal ir-
rotational point vortices in an incompressible ow eld. Since the ow is irrotational and
incompressible, we have the following useful results:
Since v = 0, we can write the velocity vector as the gradient of a scalar potential
:
v = , if irrotational. (2.163)
We call the velocity potential.
Since
T
v = 0, we have
T
=
2
= 0, (2.164)
or expanding, we have
x
2
+

2
y
2
+

2
z
2
= 0. (2.165)
We notice that the equation for is linear; hence the method of superposition is valid
here for the velocity potential. That is, we can add an arbitrary number of velocity
potentials together and get a viable ow eld.
The irrotational unsteady Bernoulli equation gives us the time and space dependent
pressure eld. This equation is not linear, so we do not expect pressures from elemen-
tary solutions to add to form total pressures.
Recalling that the incompressible, three dimensional constant viscosity Helmholtz equa-
tion can be written as
d
dt
= (
T
)v +
2
, (2.166)
we see that a ow which is initially irrotational everywhere in an unbounded uid will always
be irrotational, as
d
dt
= 0. There is no mechanism to change the vorticity from its uniform
initial value of zero. This even holds for a viscous ow. However, in a bounded medium, the
no-slip boundary condition almost always tends to diuse vorticity into the ow as we shall
see.
Further from Kelvins circulation theorem, we also note that the circulation has no
tendency to change following a particle; that is convects along particle pathlines.
2.6.1 Two interacting ideal vortices
Let us apply this notion to two ideal counterrotating vortices 1 and 2, with respective
strengths,
1
and
2
, as shown in Figure 2.10, Were it isolated, vortex 1 would have no
tendency to move itself, but would induce a velocity at a distance h away from its center of
1
2h
. This induced velocity in fact convects vortex 2, to satisfy Kelvins circulation theorem.
Similarly, vortex 2 induces a velocity of vortex 1 of

2
2h
.
The center of rotation G is the point along the 1-2 axis for which the induced velocity is
zero, as is illustrated in Figure 2.11, To calculate it we equate the induced velocities of each
vortex
1
2h
G
=

2
2(h h
G
)
, (2.167)
(h h
G
)
1
= h
G
2
, (2.168)
h
1
= h
G
(
1
+
2
), (2.169)
h
G
= h

1
1
+
2
. (2.170)
h
1
1

2
2
v =
2 h
2
1
v =
2 h
1
2
Figure 2.10: Sketch of the mutual inuence of two ideal point vortices on each other.
h
1
2
G
h
G
Figure 2.11: Sketch showing the center of rotation G.
h

v =
2 h
v =
2 h
Figure 2.12: Sketch showing a pair of counterrotating vortices of equal strength


h
image
vortex
main
vortex
Figure 2.13: Sketch showing a vortex and its image to simulate an inviscid wall.
A pair of equal strength counterrotating vortices is illustrated in Figure 2.12. Such
vortices induce the same velocity in each other, so they will propagate as a pair at a xed
distance from one another.
2.6.2 Image vortex
If we choose to model the uid as inviscid, then there is no viscous stress, and we can no
longer enforce the no slip condition at a wall. However at a slip wall, we must require that
the velocity vector be parallel to the wall. We can model the motion of an ideal vortex
separated by a distance h from an inviscid slip wall by placing a so-called image vortex on
the other side of the wall. The image vortex will induce a velocity which when superposed
with the original vortex, renders the resultant velocity to be parallel to the wall. A vortex
and its image vortex, which generates a straight streamline at a wall, is sketched in Figure
2.13,
2.6.3 Vortex sheets
We can model the slip line between two inviscid uids moving at dierent velocities by what
is known as a vortex sheet. A vortex sheet is sketched in Figure 2.14. Here we have a
distribution of small vortices, each of strength d, on the x axis. Each of these vortices
induces a small velocity dv at an arbitrary point ( x, y). The inuence of the point vortex at
(x, 0) is sketched in the gure. It generates a small velocity with magnitude
d|v| =
d
2h
=
d
2
_
( x x)
2
+ y
2
(2.171)
d
x
y
(x, y)
~ ~
(x,0)
dv
du
dv
u =
d
dx
1
2
u =
d
dx
1
2
Figure 2.14: Sketch showing schematic of vortex sheet.
Using basic trigonometry, we can deduce that the inuence of the single vortex of dierential
strength on each velocity component is
du =
d y
2 (( x x)
2
+ y
2
)
=
d
dx
y
2 (( x x)
2
+ y
2
)
dx, (2.172)
dv =
d( x x)
2 (( x x)
2
+ y
2
)
=
d
dx
( x x)
2 (( x x)
2
+ y
2
)
dx. (2.173)
Here
d
dx
is a measure of the strength of the vortex sheet. Let us account for the eects of all
of the dierential vortices by integrating from x = L to x = L and then letting L .
We obtain then the total velocity components u and v at each point to be
u = lim
L
d
dx
2
_
_
_
_
_
_
arctan
_
L x
y
_
. .
2
+arctan
_
L + x
y
_
. .
2
_
_
_
_
_
_
, (2.174)
=
_
_
_
1
2
d
dx
, if y > 0,
1
2
d
dx
, if y < 0,
(2.175)
v = lim
L
d
dx
4
ln
(L x)
2
+ y
2
(L + x)
2
+ y
2
= 0. (2.176)
So the vortex sheet generates no y component of velocity anywhere in the ow eld and two
uniform x components of velocity of opposite sign above and below the x axis.
2.6.4 Potential of an ideal vortex
Let us calculate the velocity potential function associated with a single ideal vortex. Con-
sider an ideal vortex centered at the origin, and represent the velocity eld here in cylindrical
coordinates:
v
r
= 0, v
=

2r
, v
z
= 0. (2.177)
Now in cylindrical coordinates the gradient operating on a scalar function gives
= v, (2.178)
r
e
r
+
1
r
+

z
e
z
= 0e
r
+

2r
e
+ 0e
z
, (2.179)
r
= 0, (2.180)
1
r
=

2r
, so =

2
+ C(r, z), (2.181)
z
= 0. (2.182)
But since the partials of with respect to r and z are zero, C(r, z) is at most a constant,
which we can set to zero without losing any information regarding the velocity itself
=

2
. (2.183)
In Cartesian coordinates, we have
=

2
arctan
_
y
x
_
(2.184)
Lines of constant potential for the ideal vortex centered at the origin are sketched in Figure
2.15.
2.6.5 Interaction of multiple vortices
Here we will consider the interactions of a large number of vortices by using the method of
superposition for the velocity potentials.
If we have two vortices with strengths
1
and
2
centered at arbitrary locations (x
1
, y
1
)
and (x
2
, y
2
) are sketched in Figure 2.16, the potential for each is given by
1
=

1
2
arctan
_
y y
1
x x
1
_
, (2.185)
2
=

2
2
arctan
_
y y
2
x x
2
_
. (2.186)
= 0 =
2
=
3
4
=
4
Figure 2.15: Lines of constant potential for ideal irrotational vortex.
x
1
x
2
y
1
y
2
2
Figure 2.16: Two vortices at arbitrary locations.
Since the equation governing the velocity potential,
2
= 0, is linear we can add the two
potentials and still satisfy the overall equation so that
=

1
2
arctan
_
y y
1
x x
1
_
+

2
2
arctan
_
y y
2
x x
2
_
, (2.187)
is a legitimate solution. Taking the gradient of ,
=
_
1
2
_
y y
1
(x x
1
)
2
+ (y y
1
)
2

_
2
2
_
y y
2
(x x
2
)
2
+ (y y
2
)
2
_
i
+
__
1
2
_
x x
1
(x x
1
)
2
+ (y y
1
)
2
+
_
2
2
_
x x
2
(x x
2
)
2
+ (y y
2
)
2
_
j, (2.188)
so that
u(x, y) =
_
1
2
_
y y
1
(x x
1
)
2
+ (y y
1
)
2

_
2
2
_
y y
2
(x x
2
)
2
+ (y y
2
)
2
, (2.189)
v(x, y) =
_
1
2
_
x x
1
(x x
1
)
2
+ (y y
1
)
2
+
_
2
2
_
x x
2
(x x
2
)
2
+ (y y
2
)
2
. (2.190)
Extending this to a collection of N vortices located at (x
i
, y
i
) at a given time, we have the
following for the velocity eld:
u(x, y) =
N
i=1
i
2
_
y y
i
(x x
i
)
2
+ (y y
i
)
2
, (2.191)
v(x, y) =
N
i=1
_
i
2
_
x x
i
(x x
i
)
2
+ (y y
i
)
2
. (2.192)
Now to convect (that is, to move) the kth vortex, we move it with the velocity induced
by the other vortices, since vortices convect with the ow. Recalling that the velocity is the
time derivative of the position u
k
=
dx
k
dt
, v
k
=
dy
k
dt
, we then get the following 2N non-linear
ordinary dierential equations for the 2N unknowns, the x and y positions of each of the N
vortices:
dx
k
dt
=
N
i=1,i=k
i
2
_
y
k
y
i
(x
k
x
i
)
2
+ (y
k
y
i
)
2
, x
k
(0) = x
o
k
, k = 1, . . . , N,(2.193)
dy
k
dt
=
N
i=1,i=k
_
i
2
_
x
k
x
i
(x
k
x
i
)
2
+ (y
k
y
i
)
2
, y
k
(0) = y
o
k
, k = 1, . . . , N. (2.194)
This set of equations, except for three or fewer point vortices, must be integrated numeri-
cally. These equations form what is commonly termed a Biot-Savart
23
law. These ordinary
2
Jean-Baptiste Biot, 1774-1862, Paris-born applied mathematician
3
Felix Savart, 1791-1841, French mathematician who worked on magnetic elds and acoustics.
dierential equations are highly non-linear and give rise to chaotic motion of the point vor-
tices in general. It is a very similar calculation to the motion of point masses in a Newtonian
gravitational eld, except that the essential variation goes as 1/r for vortices and 1/r
2
for
Newtonian gravitational elds. Thus the dynamics are dierent. Nevertheless just as calcu-
lations for large numbers of celestial bodies can give rise to solar systems, clusters of planets,
and galaxies, similar galaxies of vortices can be predicted with the equations for vortex
dynamics.
2.6.6 Pressure eld
We have thus far examined essentially only the kinematics of vortices. We have actually
used dynamics in our incorporation of the Helmholtz equation and Kelvins theorem, but
their simple results really only justify the use of a simple kinematics. Dynamics asks what
are the forces which give rise to the motion. Here, we will assume there is no body force
and that the uid is inviscid, in which case it must be pressure forces which give rise to the
motion. We have the proper conditions for which Bernoullis equation can be used to give
the pressure eld. We consider two cases, a single stationary point vortex, and a group of
N moving point vortices.
2.6.6.1 Single stationary vortex
If we take p = p
in the far eld and f

i
= g = 0, this steady ow gives us
1
2
v
T
v +
p
=
1
2
v
T
+
p
, (2.195)
1
2
_

2r
_
2
+
p
= 0 +
p
, (2.196)
p(r) = p

2
8
2
1
r
2
. (2.197)
Note that the pressure goes to negative innity at the origin. This is obviously unphysical.
It can be corrected by including viscous eects, which turn out not to substantially alter our
main conclusions.
2.6.6.2 Group of N vortices
For a collection of N vortices, the ow is certainly not steady, and we must in general retain
the time dependent velocity potential in Bernoullis equation yielding
t
+
1
2
()
T
+
p
= f(t). (2.198)
Now we require that as r that p p
. We also know that as r that 0,

hence 0 as well. Hence as r , we have
p
= f(t). So our nal result is

p = p
1
2
()
T

t
. (2.199)
x
y
z
wall streamline
wall vortex line

wall vortex line
wall streamline
v
Figure 2.17: Wall streamlines and vortex lines at wall y = 0.
So with a knowledge of the velocity eld through , we can determine the pressure eld
which must have given rise to that velocity eld.
2.7 Inuence of walls
The Helmholtz equation considers mechanisms that generate vorticity in the interior of a
ow. It does not, however, include one of the most important mechanisms, namely the
introduction of vorticity due to the no-slip boundary condition at a solid wall. In this
section we shall focus on that mechanism.
2.7.1 Streamlines and vortex lines at walls
It seems odd that a streamline can be dened at a wall where the velocity is formally zero, but
in the neighborhood of the wall, the uid velocity is small but non-zero. We can extrapolate
the position of streamlines near the wall to the wall to dene a wall streamline. We shall
also consider a so-called vortex line, a line everywhere parallel to the vorticity vector, at the
wall.
We consider the geometry sketched in Figure 2.17. Here the xz plane is locally attached
to a wall at y = 0, and the y direction is normal to the wall. Wall streamlines and vortex
lines are sketched in the gure.
Because the ow satises no-slip, we have at the wall
u(x, y = 0, z) = 0, v(x, y = 0, z) = 0, w(x, y = 0, z) = 0. (2.200)
Because of this, partial derivatives of all velocities with respect to either x or z will also be
2.7. INFLUENCE OF WALLS 189
zero at y = 0:
u
x
y=0
=
u
z
y=0
=
v
x
y=0
=
v
z
y=0
=
w
x
y=0
=
w
z
y=0
= 0 (2.201)
Near the wall, the velocity is near zero, so the Mach number is very small, and the ow is well
modeled as incompressible. So here, the mass conservation equation implies that
T
v = 0,
so applying this at the wall, we get
u
x
y=0
. .
=0
+
v
y
y=0
+
w
z
y=0
. .
=0
= 0 so (2.202)
v
y
y=0
= 0. (2.203)
Now let us examine the behavior of u, v, and w, as we leave the wall in the y direction.
Consider a Taylor series of each:
u = u|
y=0
. .
=0
+
u
y
y=0
y +
1
2
2
u
y
2
y=0
y
2
+ . . . , (2.204)
v = v|
y=0
. .
=0
+
v
y
y=0
. .
=0
y +
1
2
2
v
y
2
y=0
y
2
+ . . . , (2.205)
w = w|
y=0
. .
=0
+
w
y
y=0
y +
1
2
2
w
y
2
y=0
y
2
+ . . . , (2.206)
(2.207)
So we get
u =
u
y
y=0
y + . . . , (2.208)
v =
1
2
2
v
y
2
y=0
y
2
+ . . . , (2.209)
w =
w
y
y=0
y + . . . . (2.210)
Now for streamlines, we must have
dx
u
=
dy
v
=
dz
w
. (2.211)
For the streamline near the wall, consider just dx/u = dz/w, and also tag the streamline as
dz
s
, so that the slope of the wall streamline, which is the tangent of the angle between the
wall streamline and the x axis is
tan =
dz
s
dx
y=0
= lim
y0
w
u
=
w
y
y=0
u
y
y=0
(2.212)
Now consider the vorticity vector evaluated at the wall:
x
|
y=0
=
w
y
y=0
v
z
y=0
. .
=0
=
w
y
y=0
, (2.213)
y
|
y=0
=
u
z
y=0
. .
=0
w
x
y=0
. .
=0
= 0, (2.214)
z
|
y=0
=
v
x
y=0
. .
=0
u
y
y=0
=
u
y
y=0
. (2.215)
So we see that on the wall at y = 0, the vorticity vector has no component in the y direction.
Hence, it must be parallel to the wall itself. Further, we can then dene the slope of the
vortex line,
dzv
dx
, at the wall in the same fashion as we dene a streamline:
dz
v
dx
y=0
=

z
x
=
u
y
y=0
w
y
y=0
=
1
dzs
dx
y=0
(2.216)
Since the slope of the vortex line is the negative reciprocal of the slope of the streamline,
we have that at a no-slip wall, streamlines are orthogonal to vortex lines. We also note that
streamlines are orthogonal to vortex lines for ow with variation in the x and y directions
only. For general three-dimensional ows away from walls, we do not expect the two lines
to be orthogonal.
2.7.2 Generation of vorticity at walls
Now further restrict the coordinate system of the previous subsection so that the x axis is
aligned with the wall streamline and the z axis is aligned with the wall vortex line. As before
the y axis is normal to the wall. The coordinate system aligned with the wall streamlines
and vortex lines is sketched in Figure 2.18, In the gure we take the direction n to be normal
to the wall. Now for this coordinate system, we have
dz
s
dx
y=0
=
w
u
y=0
=
w
y
y=0
u
y
y=0
= 0. (2.217)
2.7. INFLUENCE OF WALLS 191
x
y
z
v
n
Figure 2.18: Coordinate system aligned with wall streamlines and vortex lines.
Hence, we must have
w
y
y=0
= 0. (2.218)
Now consider the viscous traction vector associated with the wall:
t
j
= n
i
ij
= n
y
yj
=
_
_
yx
yy
yz
_
_
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
u
y
y=0
+
v
x
y=0
_
_
v
y
y=0
+
v
y
y=0
_
_
v
z
y=0
+
w
y
y=0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
_
u
y
y=0
0
0
_
_
_
(2.219)
So the viscous force is parallel to the surface, hence it is a tangential or shear force; moreover,
it points in the same direction as the streamline. Now if we examine the vorticity vector at
the surface we nd rst by our denition of the coordinate systems that
x
=
y
= 0 at
y = 0 and that
z
|
y=0
=
v
x
y=0
. .
=0
u
y
y=0
. (2.220)
For this case, we can say that the viscous force is t
1
=
z
. In fact in general, we can say
t
viscous
= n , at a wall. (2.221)
Since the viscous force is orthogonal to both the surface normal and the vorticity vector, it
must always at the wall be aligned with the ow direction.
Chapter 3
One-dimensional compressible ow
see Yih, Chapter 6
see Liepmann and Roshko, Chapter 2
see Shapiro, Chapters 4-8
This chapter will focus on one-dimensional ow of a compressible uid. The following topics
will be covered:
development of generalized one-dimensional ow equations,
isentropic ow with area change,
ow with normal shock waves, and
the method of characteristics for isentropic rarefactions.
We will assume for this chapter:
v 0, w 0, /y 0, /z 0; one-dimensional ow.
Friction and heat transfer will not be modeled rigorously. Instead, they will be modeled
in a fashion which captures the relevant physics and retains analytic tractability. Further,
we will ignore the inuences of an external body force, f
i
= 0.
3.1 Generalized one-dimensional equations
Here we will re-derive, in a rather conventional way, the one-dimensional equations of ow
with area change. Although for the geometry we use, it will appear that we should be using
at least two-dimensional equations, our results will be correct when we interpret them as an
average value at a given x location. Our results will be valid as long as the area changes
slowly relative to how fast the ow can adjust to area changes.
193
194 CHAPTER 3. ONE-DIMENSIONAL COMPRESSIBLE FLOW
We could start directly with our equations from an earlier chapter as well. However,
the ad hoc nature of friction and heat transfer commonly employed makes a re-derivation
useful. The ow we wish to consider, ow with area change, heat transfer, and wall friction,
is illustrated by the following sketch of a control volume, Figure 3.1.
q
w
u
A
P
e
1
1
1
1
1
u
A
P
e
2
2
2
2
2
x
x
1
2
Perimeter length = L
n
2
n
1
x = x - x
2 1
n
w
Figure 3.1: Control volume sketch for one-dimensional compressible ow with area change,
heat transfer, and wall friction.
For this ow, we will adopt the following conventions
surface 1 and 2 are open and allow uxes of mass, momentum, and energy,
surface w is a closed wall; no mass ux through the wall
external heat ux q
w
(Energy/Area/Time: W/m
2
) through the wall allowed-q
w
known
xed parameter,
diusive, longitudinal heat transfer ignored, q
x
= 0,
wall shear
w
(Force/Area: N/m
2
) allowed
w
known, xed parameter,
diusive viscous stress not allowed
xx
= 0, and
cross-sectional area a known xed function: A(x).
3.1. GENERALIZED ONE-DIMENSIONAL EQUATIONS 195
3.1.1 Mass
Take the over-bar notation to indicate a volume averaged quantity.
The amount of mass in a control volume after a time increment t is equal to the original
amount of mass plus that which came in minus that which left:

Ax
t+t
=

Ax
t
+
1
A
1
(u
1
t)
2
A
2
(u
2
t) . (3.1)
Rearrange and divide by xt:

A
t+t

A
t
t
+

2
A
2
u
2
1
A
1
u
1
x
= 0. (3.2)
Taking the limit as t 0, x 0, we get
t
(A) +

x
(Au) = 0. (3.3)
If the ow is steady, then
d
dx
(Au) = 0, (3.4)
Au
d
dx
+ u
dA
dx
+ A
du
dx
= 0, (3.5)
1
d
dx
+
1
A
dA
dx
+
1
u
du
dx
= 0. (3.6)
Now integrate from x
1
to x
2
to get
_
x
2
x
1
d
dx
(Au)dx =
_
x
2
x
1
0dx, (3.7)
_
2
1
d (Au) = 0, (3.8)
2
u
2
A
2
1
u
1
A
1
= 0, (3.9)
2
u
2
A
2
=
1
u
1
A
1
m = C
1
. (3.10)
3.1.2 Linear momentum
Newtons Second Law says the time rate of change of linear momentum of a body equals the
sum of the forces acting on the body. In the x direction this is roughly as follows:
d
dt
(mu) = F
x
. (3.11)
In discrete form this would be
mu|
t+t
mu|
t
t
= F
x
, (3.12)
mu|
t+t
= mu|
t
+ F
x
t. (3.13)
For a control volume containing uid, we must also account for the momentum which
enters and leaves the control volume. The amount of momentum in a control volume after
a time increment t is equal to the original amount of momentum plus that which came in
minus that which left plus that introduced by the forces acting on the control volume.
Note that
pressure force at surface 1 pushes uid,
pressure force at surface 2 restrains uid,
force due to the reaction of the wall to the pressure force pushes uid if area change
positive, and
force due to the reaction of the wall to the shear force restrains uid.
We write the linear momentum principle as
_

Ax
_
u
t+t
=
_

Ax
_
u
t
+(
1
A
1
(u
1
t)) u
1
(
2
A
2
(u
2
t)) u
2
+(p
1
A
1
) t (p
2
A
2
) t
+( p (A
2
A
1
)) t
w

Lx
_
t. (3.14)
Rearrange and divide by xt to get

A u
t+t

A u
t
t
+

2
A
2
u
2
2
1
A
1
u
2
1
x
=
p
2
A
2
p
1
A
1
x
+ p
A
2
A
1
x

w

L. (3.15)
In the limit x 0, t 0 we get
t
(Au) +

x
_
Au
2
_
=

x
(pA) + p
A
x

w
L. (3.16)
In steady state we nd
d
dx
_
Au
2
_
=
d
dx
(pA) + p
dA
dx

w
L, (3.17)
Au
du
dx
+ u
d
dx
(Au) = p
dA
dx
A
dp
dx
+ p
dA
dx

w
L, (3.18)
u
du
dx
=
dp
dx

w
L
A
, (3.19)
udu + dp =
w
L
A
dx, (3.20)
du +
1
u
dp =
w
L
m
dx, (3.21)
d
_
u
2
2
_
+ dp =
w
L
A
dx. (3.22)
Wall shear lowers the combination of pressure and dynamic head.
If there is no wall shear, then we have
dp = d
_
u
2
2
_
. (3.23)
An increase in velocity magnitude decreases the pressure.
If there is no area change, dA = 0, and no friction
w
0 we have
u
du
dx
+
dp
dx
= 0, (3.24)
add product of u and mass equation u
d
dx
(u) = 0 u, (3.25)
d
dx
_
u
2
+ p
_
= 0, (3.26)
u
2
+ p =
o
u
2
o
+ p
o
= C
2
. (3.27)
3.1.3 Energy
The rst law of thermodynamics states that the change of total energy of a body equals the
heat transferred to the body minus the work done by the body:
E
2
E
1
= QW, (3.28)
E
2
= E
1
+ QW. (3.29)
So for our control volume this becomes the following when we also account for the energy
ux in and out of the control volume in addition to the work and heat transfer:
_

Ax
_
_
e +
u
2
2
_
t+t
=
_

Ax
_
_
e +
u
2
2
_
t
+
1
A
1
(u
1
t)
_
e
1
+
u
2
1
2
_
2
A
2
(u
2
t)
_
e
2
+
u
2
2
2
_
+q
w
_
Lx
_
t + (p
1
A
1
) (u
1
t) (p
2
A
2
) (u
2
t) . (3.30)
Note:
the mean pressure times area dierence does no work because it is acting on a stationary
boundary, and
the work done by the wall shear force is not included.
1
Rearrange and divide by tx:

A
_
e +
u
2
2
_
t+t

A
_
e +
u
2
2
_
t
t
+
2
A
2
u
2
_
e
2
+
u
2
2
2
+
p
2
2
_
1
A
1
u
1
_
e
1
+
u
2
1
2
+
p
1
1
_
x
= q
w

L. (3.31)
In dierential form as x 0, t 0
t
_
A
_
e +
u
2
2
__
+

x
_
Au
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
__
= q
w
L. (3.32)
In steady state:
d
dx
_
Au
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
__
= q
w
L, (3.33)
Au
d
dx
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
+
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
d
dx
(Au) = q
w
L, (3.34)
u
d
dx
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
=
q
w
L
A
, (3.35)
u
_
de
dx
+ u
du
dx
+
1
dp
dx

p
2
d
dx
_
=
q
w
L
A
, (3.36)
subtract the product of momentum and velocity (3.37)
u
2
du
dx
+ u
dp
dx
=
w
Lu
A
, (3.38)
u
de
dx

pu
d
dx
=
q
w
L
A
+

w
Lu
A
, (3.39)
de
dx

p
2
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
m
. (3.40)
1
In neglecting work done by the wall shear force, I have taken an approach which is nearly universal, but
fundamentally dicult to defend. At this stage of the development of these notes, I am not ready to enter
into a grand battle with all established authors and probably confuse the student; consequently, results for
ow with friction will be consistent with those of other sources. The argument typically used to justify this
is that the real uid satises no-slip at the boundary; thus, the wall shear actually does no work. However,
one can easily argue that within the context of the one-dimensional model which has been posed that the
shear force behaves as an external force which reduces the uids mechanical energy. Moreover, it is possible
to show that neglect of this term results in the loss of frame invariance, a serious defect indeed. To model
the work of the wall shear, one would include the term
_
w
_
Lx
__
( ut) in the energy equation.
Since e = e(p, )
de =
e
p
d +
e
p
dp, (3.41)
de
dx
=
e
p
d
dx
+
e
p
dp
dx
. (3.42)
so the steady energy equation becomes
e
p
d
dx
+
e
p
dp
dx

p
2
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
m
, (3.43)
dp
dx
+
_
_
_
e
2
e
p
_
_
_
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
m
e
p
. (3.44)
Now let us consider the term in braces in the previous equation. We can put that term
in a more common form by considering the Gibbs equation, Eq. (1.529):
Tds = de
p
2
d, (3.45)
along with a general caloric equation of state e = e(p, ), from which we get
de =
e
p
dp +
e
p
d. (3.46)
Substituting into the Gibbs equation, we get
Tds =
e
p
dp +
e
p
d
p
2
d. (3.47)
Taking s to be constant and dividing by d, we get
0 =
e
p
s
+
e
2
. (3.48)
Rearranging, we get
p
s
c
2
=
_
_
_
e
2
e
p
_
_
_
, (3.49)
so
dp
dx
c
2
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
m
e
p
, (3.50)
dp
dx
c
2
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
uA
e
p
. (3.51)
In the above c is the isentropic sound speed, a thermodynamic property of the material. We
shall see in a later section why it is appropriate to interpret this property as the propagation
speed of small disturbances. At this point, it should simply be thought of as a state property.
Consider now the special case of ow with no heat transfer q
w
0. We still allow area
change and wall friction allowed (see earlier footnote):
u
d
dx
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
= 0, (3.52)
e +
u
2
2
+
p
= e
o
+
u
2
o
2
+
p
o
o
= C
3
, (3.53)
h +
u
2
2
= h
o
+
u
2
o
2
= C
3
. (3.54)
3.1.4 Summary of equations
We can summarize the one-dimensional compressible ow equations in various forms here.
In the equations below, we assume A(x),
w
, q
w
, and L are all known.
3.1.4.1 Unsteady conservative form
t
(A) +

x
(Au) = 0, (3.55)
t
(Au) +

x
_
Au
2
+ pA
_
= p
A
x

w
L, (3.56)
t
_
A
_
e +
u
2
2
__
+

x
_
Au
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
__
= q
w
L, (3.57)
e = e(, p), (3.58)
p = p(, T). (3.59)
3.1.4.2 Unsteady non-conservative form
d
dt
=
x
(Au), (3.60)
du
dt
=
p
x
+

w
L
A
, (3.61)
de
dt
= p
u
x
+
q
w
L
w
Lu
A
, (3.62)
e = e(, p), (3.63)
p = p(, T). (3.64)
3.1.4.3 Steady conservative form
d
dx
(Au) = 0, (3.65)
d
dx
_
Au
2
+ pA
_
= p
dA
dx

w
L, (3.66)
d
dx
_
Au
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
__
= q
w
L, (3.67)
e = e(, p), (3.68)
p = p(, T). (3.69)
3.1.4.4 Steady non-conservative form
u
d
dx
=
A
d
dx
(Au), (3.70)
u
du
dx
=
dp
dx
+

w
L
A
, (3.71)
u
de
dx
= p
du
dx
+
q
w
L
w
Lu
A
, (3.72)
e = e(, p), (3.73)
p = p(, T). (3.74)
In whatever form we consider, we have ve equations in ve unknown dependent variables:
, u, p, e, and T. We can always use the thermal and caloric state equations to eliminate e
and T to give rise to three equations in three unknowns.
Example 3.1
Flow of air with heat addition
Given: Air initially at p
1
= 100 kPa, T
1
= 300 K, u
1
= 10
m
s
ows in a duct of length 100 m.
The duct has a constant circular cross sectional area of A = 0.02 m
2
and is isobarically heated with
a constant heat ux q
w
along the entire surface of the duct. At the end of the duct the ow has
p
2
= 100 kPa, T
2
= 500 K
Find: the mass ow rate m, the wall heat ux q
w
and the entropy change s
2
s
1
; check for
satisfaction of the second law.
Assume: Calorically perfect ideal gas, R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K), c
p
= 1.0035 kJ/(kg K)
Analysis:
Geometry:
A = r
2
, (3.75)
r =
_
A
(3.76)
L = 2r = 2
A = 2
_
(0.02 m
2
) = 0.501 m. (3.77)
Now get the mass ux.
p
1
=
1
RT
1
, (3.78)
1
=
p
1
RT
1
=
100 kPa
_
0.287
kJ
kg K
_
(300 K)
, (3.79)
= 1.161
kg
m
3
(3.80)
So
m =
1
u
1
A
1
=
_
1.161
kg
m
3
_
_
10
m
s
_
_
0.02 m
2
_
= 0.2322
kg
s
. (3.81)
Now get the ow variables at state 2:
2
=
p
2
RT
2
, =
100 kPa
_
0.287
kJ
kg K
_
(500 K)
, (3.82)
= 0.6969
kg
m
3
, (3.83)
2
u
2
A
2
=
1
u
1
A
1
, (3.84)
u
2
=

1
u
1
A
1
2
A
2
=

1
u
1
2
, (3.85)
=
_
1.161
kg
m
3
_
_
10
m
s
_
0.6969
kg
m
3
= 16.67
m
s
. (3.86)
Now consider the energy equation:
u
d
dx
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
=
q
w
L
A
, (3.87)
d
dx
_
h +
u
2
2
_
=
q
w
L
m
, (3.88)
_
L
0
d
dx
_
h +
u
2
2
_
dx =
_
L
0
q
w
L
m
dx, (3.89)
h
2
+
u
2
2
2
h
1
u
2
1
2
=
q
w
LL
m
, (3.90)
c
p
(T
2
T
1
) +
u
2
2
2

u
2
1
2
=
q
w
LL
m
. (3.91)
Solving for q
w
, we get
q
w
=
_
m
LL
__
c
p
(T
2
T
1
) +
u
2
2
2

u
2
1
2
_
, (3.92)
q
w
=
_
0.2322
kg
s
(100 m) (0.501 m)
__
_
1003.5
J
kg K
_
(500 K 300 K) +
_
16.67
m
s
_
2
2

_
10
m
s
_
2
2
_
, (3.93)
q
w
= 0.004635
kg
m
2
s
_
200700
J
kg
88.9
m
2
s
2
_
, (3.94)
q
w
= 0.004635
kg
m
2
s
_
200700
J
kg
88.9
J
kg
_
, (3.95)
q
w
= 930
W
m
2
. (3.96)
The heat ux is positive, which indicates a transfer of thermal energy into the air.
Now nd the entropy change.
s
2
s
1
= c
p
ln
_
T
2
T
1
_
Rln
_
p
2
p
1
_
, (3.97)
s
2
s
1
=
_
1003.5
J
kg K
_
ln
_
500 K
300 K
_
_
287
J
kg K
_
ln
_
100 kPa
100 kPa
_
, (3.98)
s
2
s
1
= 512.6 0 = 512.6
J
kg K
. (3.99)
Is the second law satised? Assume the heat transfer takes place from a reservoir held at 500 K. The
reservoir would have to be at least at 500 K in order to bring the uid to its nal state of 500 K. It
could be greater than 500 K and still satisfy the second law.
S
2
S
1

Q
12
T
, (3.100)
S
2

S
1

Q
12
T
, (3.101)
m(s
2
s
1
)
Q
12
T
, (3.102)
m(s
2
s
1
)
q
w
A
tot
T
, (3.103)
m(s
2
s
1
)
q
w
LL
T
, (3.104)
s
2
s
1

q
w
LL
mT
, (3.105)
512.6
J
kg K

_
930
J
s m
2
_
(100 m) (0.501 m)
_
0.2322
kg
s
_
(500 K)
, (3.106)
512.6
J
kg K
401.3
J
kg K
. (3.107)
3.1.5 Inuence coecients
Now, let us uncouple the steady one-dimensional equations. First let us summarize again,
in a slightly dierent manner than before:
u
d
dx
+
du
dx
=
u
A
dA
dx
, (3.108)
u
du
dx
+
dp
dx
=
w
L
A
, (3.109)
dp
dx
c
2
d
dx
=
(q
w
+
w
u) L
uA
e
p
. (3.110)
In matrix form this is
_
_
u 0
0 u 1
c
2
0 1
_
_
_
_
d
dx
du
dx
dp
dx
_
_
=
_
_
_
u
A
dA
dx
wL
A
(qw+wu)L
uA
e
p
|
_
_
_
. (3.111)
Use Cramers Rule to solve for the derivatives. First calculate the determinant of the coef-
cient matrix:
u ((u)(1) (1)(0))
_
(0)(1) (c
2
)(1)
_
=
_
u
2
c
2
_
. (3.112)
Implementing Cramers Rule:
d
dx
=
u
_
u
A
dA
dx
_
wL
A
_
+
_
(qw+wu)L
uA
e
p
|
_
(u
2
c
2
)
, (3.113)
du
dx
=
c
2
_
u
A
dA
dx
_
+ u
_
wL
A
_
u
_
(qw+wu)L
uA
e
p
|
_
(u
2
c
2
)
, (3.114)
dp
dx
=
uc
2
_
u
A
dA
dx
_
c
2
_
wL
A
_
+ u
2
_
(qw+wu)L
uA
e
p
|
_
(u
2
c
2
)
. (3.115)
Simplify to nd
d
dx
=
1
A
u
2 dA
dx
+
w
L +
(qw+wu)L
u
e
p
|
(u
2
c
2
)
, (3.116)
du
dx
=
1
A
c
2
u
dA
dx
u
w
L
(qw+wu)L
e
p
|
(u
2
c
2
)
. (3.117)
dp
dx
=
1
A
c
2
u
2 dA
dx
+ c
2
w
L +
(qw+wu)Lu
e
p
|
(u
2
c
2
)
. (3.118)
Note, we have
a system of coupled non-linear ordinary dierential equations,
in standard form for dynamic system analysis: du/dx = f(u),
valid for general equations of state, and
singular when velocity sonic u = c.
3.2. FLOW WITH AREA CHANGE 205
3.2 Flow with area change
This section will consider ow with area change with an emphasis on isentropic ow. Some
problems will involve non-isentropic ow but a detailed discussion of such ows will be
delayed.
3.2.1 Isentropic Mach number relations
Take the special case of

w
= 0,
q
w
= 0,
calorically perfect ideal gas (CPIG).
Then
d
dx
(uA) = 0, (3.119)
d
dx
_
u
2
+ p
_
= 0, (3.120)
d
dx
_
e +
u
2
2
+
p
_
= 0. (3.121)
Integrate the energy equation using Eq. (1.519) h = e + p/ to get
h +
u
2
2
= h
o
+
u
2
o
2
. (3.122)
If we dene the o condition to be a condition of rest, then u
o
0. This is a stagnation
condition. So
h +
u
2
2
= h
o
, (3.123)
(h h
o
) +
u
2
2
= 0. (3.124)
Since we have a CPIG,
c
p
(T T
o
) +
u
2
2
= 0, (3.125)
T T
o
+
u
2
2c
p
= 0, (3.126)
1
T
o
T
+
u
2
2c
p
T
= 0. (3.127)
Now note that
c
p
= c
p
c
p
c
v
c
p
c
v
=
c
p
c
v
c
p
c
v
cp
cv
1
=
R
1
, (3.128)
so
1
T
o
T
+
1
2
u
2
RT
= 0, (3.129)
T
o
T
= 1 +
1
2
u
2
RT
. (3.130)
Recall the sound speed and Mach number for a CPIG:
c
2
= RT if p = RT, e = c
v
T + e
o
, (3.131)
M
2
_
u
c
_
2
. (3.132)
Thus,
T
o
T
= 1 +
1
2
M
2
, (3.133)
T
T
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
_
1
. (3.134)
Now if the ow is isentropic, we have
T
T
o
=
_
o
_
1
=
_
p
p
o
_
1
. (3.135)
Thus,
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
_
1
1
, (3.136)
p
p
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
_

1
. (3.137)
For air = 7/5, so
T
T
o
=
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_
1
, (3.138)
o
=
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_
5
2
, (3.139)
p
p
o
=
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_
7
2
. (3.140)
Figures 3.2, 3.3 3.4 show the variation of T, and p with M
2
for isentropic ow.
Other thermodynamic properties can be determined from these, e.g. the sound speed:
c
c
o
=
RT
RT
o
=
_
T
T
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
_
1/2
. (3.141)
calorically perfect
ideal gas

R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)
= 7/5
stagnation temperature = 300 K
0 2 4 6 8 10
M
2
50
100
150
200
250
300
T(K)
Figure 3.2: Static temperature versus Mach number squared.
calorically perfect
ideal gas

R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)
= 7/5
stagnation pressure = 1 bar
0 2 4 6 8 10
M
2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
p(bar)
Figure 3.3: Static pressure versus Mach number squared.
0 2 4 6 8 10
M
2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
(kg/m
3
)
calorically perfect
ideal gas
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)
= 7/5
stagnation density = 1.16 kg/m
3

Figure 3.4: Static density versus Mach number squared.
Example 3.2
Airplane problem
Given: An airplane is ying into still air at u = 200 m/s. The ambient air is at 288 K and
101.3 kPa.
Find: Temperature, pressure, and density at nose of airplane
Assume: Steady isentropic ow of C.P.I.G.
Analysis: In the steady wave frame, the ambient conditions are static while the nose conditions are
stagnation.
M =
u
c
=
u
RT
=
200 m/s
_
7
5
_
287
J
kgK
_
288 K
= 0.588 (3.142)
so
T
o
= T
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_
= (288 K)
_
1 +
1
5
0.588
2
_
= 307.9 K (3.143)
o
=
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_5
2
=
101.3 kPa
_
0.287
kJ
kg K
_
(288 K)
_
1 +
1
5
0.588
2
_5
2
= 1.45
kg
m
3
(3.144)
p
o
= p
_
1 +
1
5
M
2
_7
2
= (101.3 kPa)
_
1 +
1
5
0.588
2
_7
2
= 128 kPa (3.145)
Note the temperature, pressure, and density all rise in the isentropic process. In this wave frame, the
kinetic energy of the ow is being converted isentropically to thermal energy.
3.2.2 Sonic properties
Let * denote a property at the sonic state M
2
1
T
T
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
1
2
_
1
=
2
+ 1
, (3.146)
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
1
2
_
1
1
=
_
2
+ 1
_ 1
1
, (3.147)
p
p
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
1
2
_

1
=
_
2
+ 1
_

1
, (3.148)
c
c
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
1
2
_
1/2
=
_
2
+ 1
, (3.149)
u
= c
=
_
RT
=
_
2
+ 1
RT
o
. (3.150)
If the uid is air, we have = 7/5 and
T
T
o
= 0.8333, (3.151)
o
= 0.6339, (3.152)
p
p
o
= 0.5283, (3.153)
c
c
o
= 0.9123. (3.154)
3.2.3 Eect of area change
To understand the eect of area change, the inuence of the mass equation must be con-
sidered. So far we have really only looked at energy. In the isentropic limit the mass,
momentum, and energy equation for a C.P.I.G. reduce to
d
+
du
u
+
dA
A
= 0, (3.155)
udu + dp = 0, (3.156)
dp
p
=
d
. (3.157)
Substitute energy, then mass into momentum:
udu +
p
d = 0, (3.158)
udu +
p
u
du

A
dA
_
= 0, (3.159)
du +
p
1
u
2
du
1
uA
dA
_
= 0, (3.160)
du
_
1
p/
u
2
_
=
p
dA
uA
, (3.161)
du
u
_
1
p/
u
2
_
=
p/
u
2
dA
A
, (3.162)
du
u
_
1
1
M
2
_
=
1
M
2
dA
A
, (3.163)
du
u
_
M
2
1
_
=
dA
A
, (3.164)
du
u
=
1
M
2
1
dA
A
. (3.165)
Figure 3.5 gives show the performance of a uid in a variable area duct. We note
there is a singularity when M
2
= 1,
if M
2
= 1, we need dA = 0,
area minimum necessary to transition from subsonic to supersonic ow,
Consider u > 0
Subsonic
Diffuser
Subsonic
Nozzle
Supersonic
Nozzle
Supersonic
Diffuser
dA > 0, M < 1 so
du < 0, flow slows down
dp > 0
2
dA < 0, M <1 so
du > 0, flow speeds up
dp < 0
2
dA < 0, M > 1 so
du < 0, flow slows down
dp > 0
2
dA > 0, M >1 so
du > 0, flow speeds up
dp < 0
2
Figure 3.5: Behavior of uid in sub- and supersonic nozzles and diusers.
it can be shown an area maximum is not relevant.
Consider A at a sonic state. From the mass equation:
uA =
, (3.166)
uA =
, (3.167)
A
A
1
u
=

_
RT
1
u
=

RT
RT
RT
u
, (3.168)
A
A
_
T
T
1
M
=

_
T
T
o
T
o
T
1
M
. (3.169)
Substitute from earlier-developed relations and get
A
A
=
1
M
_
2
+ 1
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
__1
2
+1
1
. (3.170)
Figure 3.6 shows the performance of a uid in a variable area duct.
Note that
A/A
has a minimum value of 1 at M = 1,

For each A/A > 1, there exist two values of M, and
A/A
as M 0 or M .
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M
1
2
3
4
5
6
A/A*
calorically perfect
ideal gas
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)
= 7/5
Figure 3.6: Area versus Mach number for a calorically perfect ideal gas.
3.2.4 Choking
Consider mass ow rate variation with pressure dierence. We have then
small pressure dierence gives small velocity and small mass ow,
as pressure dierence grows, velocity and mass ow rate grow,
velocity is limited to sonic at a particular duct location,
this provides fundamental restriction on mass ow rate,
it can be proven rigorously that sonic condition gives maximum mass ow rate.
m
max
=
, (3.171)
if ideal gas: = =
o
_
2
+ 1
_ 1
1
__
2
+ 1
RT
o
_
A
, (3.172)
=
o
_
2
+ 1
_ 1
1
_
2
+ 1
_
1/2
_
RT
o
A
, (3.173)
=
o
_
2
+ 1
_1
2
+1
1 _
RT
o
A
. (3.174)
A ow which has a maximum mass ow rate is known as choked ow. Flows will choke
at area minima in a duct.
Example 3.3
Isentropic area change problem with choking
2
2
adopted from White, Fluid Mechanics McGraw-Hill: New York, 1986, p. 529, Ex. 9.5
Given: Air with stagnation conditions p
o
= 200 kPa T
o
= 500 K ows through a throat to an exit
Mach number of 2.5. The desired mass ow is 3.0 kg/s,
Find: a) throat area, b) exit pressure, c) exit temperature, d) exit velocity, and e) exit area.
Assume: C.P.I.G., isentropic ow, = 7/5
Analysis:
o
=
p
o
RT
o
=
200 kPa
_
0.287
kJ
kg K
_
(500 K)
= 1.394 kg/m
3
. (3.175)
Since it necessarily ows through a sonic throat:
m
max
=
o
_
2
+ 1
_1
2
+1
1 _
RT
o
A
, (3.176)
A
=
m
max
o
_
2
+1
_1
2
+1
1
RT
o
, (3.177)
A
=
3
kg
s
_
1.394
kg
m
3
_
(0.5787)
_
1.4
_
287
J
kg K
_
(500 K)
= 0.008297 m
2
. (3.178)
Since we know M
e
use isentropic relations to nd other exit conditions.
p
e
= p
o
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
e
_

1
= (200 kPa)
_
1 +
1
5
2.5
2
_
3.5
= 11.71 kPa, (3.179)
T
e
= T
o
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
e
_
1
= (500 K)
_
1 +
1
5
2.5
2
_
1
= 222.2 K. (3.180)
Note
e
=
p
e
RT
e
=
11.71 kPa
_
0.287
kJ
kg K
_
(222.2 K)
= 0.1834
kg
m
3
. (3.181)
Now the exit velocity is simply
u
e
= M
e
c
e
= M
e
_
RT
e
= 2.5
1.4
_
287
J
kg K
_
(222.2 K) = 747.0
m
s
. (3.182)
Now determine the exit area.
A =
A
M
e
_
2
+ 1
_
1 +
1
2
M
2
e
__1
2
+1
1
, (3.183)
=
0.008297 m
2
2.5
_
5
6
_
1 +
1
5
2.5
2
__
3
= 0.0219 m
2
. (3.184)
3.3. NORMAL SHOCK WAVES 213
3.3 Normal shock waves
This section will develop relations for normal shock waves in uids with general equations of
state. It will be specialized to calorically perfect ideal gases to illustrate the general features
of the waves.
Assume for this section we have
one-dimensional ow,
steady ow,
no area change,
viscous eects and wall friction do not have time to inuence ow, and
heat conduction and wall heat transfer do not have time to inuence ow.
We will consider the problem in the context of the piston problem as sketched in Figure 3.7.
v = v
p
2
v = v
p

2
2
2
v = 0
p

1
1
D
u = u
p

2
2
2
u = -D
p

1
1
Steady Wave Frame Laboratory Frame
x* x
u = v - D v = u + D
x = x* - D t, x* = x + D t
Figure 3.7: Normal shock sketch.
The physical problem is as follows:
Drive a piston with known velocity v
p
into a uid at rest (v
1
= 0) with known proper-
ties, p
1
,
1
in the x
laboratory frame,
Determine the disturbance speed D,
Determine the disturbance properties v
2
, p
2
,
2
,
in this frame of reference we have an unsteady problem.
Transformed Problem:
use a Galilean transformation x = x
Dt, u = v D to transform to the frame in

which the wave is at rest, therefore rending the problem steady in this frame,
solve as though D is known to get downstream 2 conditions: u
2
(D), p
2
(D), ...,
invert to solve for D as function of u
2
, the transformed piston velocity: D(u
2
),
back transform to get all variables as function of v
2
, the laboratory piston velocity:
D(v
2
), p
2
(v
2
),
2
(v
2
), ....
3.3.1 Rankine-Hugoniot equations
Under these assumptions the conservation principles in conservative form and equation of
state are in the steady frame as follows:
d
dx
(u) = 0, (3.185)
d
dx
_
u
2
+ p
_
= 0, (3.186)
d
dx
_
u
_
h +
u
2
2
__
= 0, (3.187)
h = h(p, ). (3.188)
Upstream conditions are =
1
, p = p
1
, u = D. With knowledge of the equation of state,
we get h = h
1
. In what is a natural, but in fact naive, step we can integrate the equations
from upstream to state 2 to give the correct Rankine-Hugoniot jump equations.
34
2
u
2
=
1
D, (3.189)
2
u
2
2
+ p
2
=
1
D
2
+ p
1
, (3.190)
h
2
+
u
2
2
2
= h
1
+
D
2
2
, (3.191)
h
2
= h(p
2
,
2
). (3.192)
This analysis is straightforward and yields the correct result. In actuality, however, the
analysis should be more nuanced. We are going to solve these algebraic equations to arrive at
discontinuous shock jumps. Thus, we should be concerned about the validity of of dierential
equations in the vicinity of a discontinuity.
As described by LeVeque,
5
the proper way to arrive at the shock jump equations is to use
a more primitive form of the conservation laws, expressed in terms of integrals of conserved
3
William John Macquorn Rankine, 1820-1872, Scottish engineer and mechanician, pioneer of thermody-
namics and steam engine theory, taught at University of Glasgow, studied fatigue in railway engine axles.
4
Pierre Henri Hugoniot, 1851-1887, French engineer.
5
LeVeque, R. J., 1992, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhauser, Basel.
quantities balanced by uxes of those quantities. If q is a set of conserved variables, and
f(q) is the ux of q (e.g. for mass conservation, is a conserved variable and u is the ux),
then the primitive form of the conservation law can be written as
d
dt
_
x
2
x
1
q(x, t)dx = f(q(x
1
, t)) f(q(x
2
, t)). (3.193)
Here we have considered ow into and out of a one-dimensional box for x [x
1
, x
2
]. For our
Euler equations we have
q =
_
_
_
e +
1
2
u
2
_
_
_
, f(q) =
_
_
u
u
2
+ p
u
_
e +
1
2
u
2
+
p
_
_
_
. (3.194)
If we assume there is a discontinuity in the region x [x
1
, x
2
] propagating at speed D, we
can break up the integral into the form
d
dt
_
x
1
+Dt
x
1
q(x, t)dx +
d
dt
_
x
2
x
1
+Dt
+
q(x, t)dx = f(q(x
1
, t)) f(q(x
2
, t)). (3.195)
Here x
1
+Dt
lies just before the discontinuity and x

1
+Dt
+
lies just past the discontinuity.
Using Leibnitzs rule, we get
q(x
1
+ Dt
, t)D + 0 +
_
x
1
+Dt
x
1
q
t
dx + 0 q(x
1
+ Dt
+
, t)D +
_
x
2
x
1
+Dt
+
q
t
dx (3.196)
= f(q(x
1
, t)) f(q(x
2
, t)).
Now if we assume that on either side of the discontinuity the volume of integration is su-
ciently small so that the time and space variation of q is negligibly small, we get
q(x
1
)D q(x
2
)D = f(q(x
1
)) f(q(x
2
)), (3.197)
D(q(x
1
) q(x
2
)) = f(q(x
1
)) f(q(x
2
)). (3.198)
Dening next the notation for a jump as
q(x) q(x
2
) q(x
1
), (3.199)
the jump conditions are rewritten as
Dq(x) = f(q(x)) . (3.200)
If D = 0, as is the case when we transform to the frame where the wave is at rest, we
simply recover
0 = f(q(x
1
)) f(q(x
2
)), (3.201)
f(q(x
1
)) = f(q(x
2
)), (3.202)
f(q(x)) = 0. (3.203)
That is the uxes on either side of the discontinuity are equal. This is precisely what we
obtained by our naive analysis. We also get a more general result for D = 0, which is the
well-known
D =
f(q(x
2
)) f(q(x
1
))
q(x
2
) q(x
1
)
=
f(q(x))
q(x)
. (3.204)
The general Rankine-Hugoniot equation then for the one-dimensional Euler equations across
a non-stationary jump is given by
D
_
_
2
u
2
1
u
1
2
_
e
2
+
1
2
u
2
2
_
1
_
e
1
+
1
2
u
2
1
_
_
_
=
_
_
2
u
2
1
u
1
2
u
2
2
+ p
2
1
u
2
1
p
1
2
u
2
_
e
2
+
1
2
u
2
2
+
p
2
2
_
1
u
1
_
e
1
+
1
2
u
2
1
+
p
1
1
_
_
_
.
(3.205)
3.3.2 Rayleigh line
If we operate on the momentum equation as follows
p
2
= p
1
+
1
D
2
2
u
2
2
, (3.206)
p
2
= p
1
+

2
1
D
2

2
2
u
2
2
2
. (3.207)
Since mass gives us
2
2
u
2
2
=
2
1
D
2
we get an equation for the Rayleigh Line,
6
a line in (p, 1/)
space:
p
2
= p
1
+
2
1
D
2
_
1
2
_
. (3.208)
Note that the Rayleigh line
passes through ambient state,
has negative slope,
has a slope with magnitude proportional to square of the wave speed, and
is independent of state and energy equations.
6
John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), 1842-1919, aristocratic-born English mathematician and physi-
cist, studied at Cambridge, inuenced by Stokes, toured the United States rather than the traditional
continent of Europe, described correctly why the sky is blue, appointed Cavendish professor experimental
physics at Cambridge, won the Nobel prize for the discovery of Argon, described traveling waves and solitons.
3.3.3 Hugoniot curve
Let us now work on the energy equation, using both mass and momentum to eliminate
velocity. First eliminate u
2
via the mass equation:
h
2
+
u
2
2
2
= h
1
+
D
2
2
, (3.209)
h
2
+
1
2
_
1
D
2
_
2
= h
1
+
D
2
2
, (3.210)
h
2
h
1
+
D
2
2
_
_
2
_
2
1
_
= 0, (3.211)
h
2
h
1
+
D
2
2
_
2
1
2
2
2
2
_
= 0, (3.212)
h
2
h
1
+
D
2
2
_
(
1
2
) (
1
+
2
)
2
2
_
= 0. (3.213)
Now use the Rayleigh line, Eq. (3.208), to eliminate D
2
:
D
2
= (p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
1
__
1
2
_
1
, (3.214)
D
2
= (p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
1
__
2
_
1
, (3.215)
D
2
= (p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
1
__

1
1
_
. (3.216)
So the energy equation becomes
h
2
h
1
+
1
2
(p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
1
__

1
1
__
(
1
2
) (
1
+
2
)
2
2
_
= 0, (3.217)
h
2
h
1
1
2
(p
2
p
1
)
_
1
1
__
1
+
2
2
_
= 0, (3.218)
h
2
h
1
1
2
(p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
+
1
1
_
= 0. (3.219)
Regrouping to see what induces enthalpy changes, we get
h
2
h
1
= (p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
__
1
2
+
1
1
_
. (3.220)
This equation is the Hugoniot equation. It
holds that enthalpy change equals the product of the pressure dierence and mean
volume,
is independent of wave speed D and velocity u
2
, and
is independent of the equation of state.
3.3.4 Solution procedure for general equations of state
The shocked state can be determined by the following procedure:
specify the equation of state h(p, ),
substitute the equation of state into the Hugoniot, Eq. (3.220), to get a second relation
between p
2
and
2
,
use the Rayleigh line, Eq. (3.208), to eliminate p
2
in the Hugoniot so that the Hugoniot
is a single equation in
2
,
solve for
2
as functions of 1 and D,
back substitute to solve for p
2
, u
2
, h
2
, T
2
as functions of 1 and D,
invert to nd D as function of 1 state and u
2
,
back transform to laboratory frame to get D as function of 1 state and piston velocity
v
2
= v
p
.
3.3.5 Calorically perfect ideal gas solutions
Let us follow this procedure for the special case of a calorically perfect ideal gas.
h = c
p
(T T
o
) + h
o
, (3.221)
p = RT. (3.222)
Thus,
h = c
p
_
p
R

p
o
R
o
_
+ h
o
, (3.223)
h =
c
p
R
_
p

p
o
o
_
+ h
o
, (3.224)
h =
c
p
c
p
c
v
_
p

p
o
o
_
+ h
o
, (3.225)
h =

1
_
p

p
o
o
_
+ h
o
. (3.226)
Evaluate at states 1 and 2 and substitute into the Hugoniot equation, Eq. (3.220):
_

1
_
p
2
p
o
o
_
+ h
o
_
_

1
_
p
1
p
o
o
_
+ h
o
_
= (p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
__
1
2
+
1
1
_
,
1
_
p
2
p
1
1
_
(p
2
p
1
)
_
1
2
__
1
2
+
1
1
_
= 0,
p
2
_

1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
_
p
1
_

1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
_
= 0,
p
2
_
+ 1
2 ( 1)
1
1
2
1
_
p
1
_
+ 1
2 ( 1)
1
1
2
2
_
= 0,
p
2
_
+ 1
1
1
1
_
p
1
_
+ 1
1
1
2
_
= 0,
p
2
= p
1
+1
1
1
2
+1
1
1
1
.
a hyperbola in (p, 1/) space,
1/
2
( 1)/( + 1)(1/
1
) causes p
2
, note = = 1.4,
2
6 for innite
pressure, and
as 1/
2
, p
2
p
1
( 1)/( + 1), note negative pressure, not physical here.
The Rayleigh line and Hugoniot curve are sketched in Figure 3.8.
2 3 4 5 6 7
100
200
300
400
500
1/ (kg/m )
3
p (kPa)
1/
1
1/
2
p
1
p
2
initial state
excluded zone
slope of Rayleigh line < 0
excluded zone, 2nd law violation
Hugoniot,
from energy
Rayleigh line, slope ~ D
from mass and momentum
2
1/ = (-1) 1
(+1)
min
1
-(-1) p
1
+1 excluded zone, negative pressure
shocked state
excluded
zone,
1/ < 1/
min
Figure 3.8: Rayleigh line and Hugoniot curve for a typical shocked gas.
Note:
intersections of the two curves are solutions to the equations,
the ambient state 1 is one solution,
the other solution 2 is known as the shock solution,
the shock solution has higher pressure and higher density,
higher wave speed implies higher pressure and higher density,
a minimum wave speed exists, it
occurs when the Rayleigh line is tangent to the Hugoniot curve,
occurs for innitesimally small pressure changes,
corresponds to a sonic wave speed, and
has disturbances which are acoustic.
if pressure increases, it can be shown that entropy increases, and
if pressure decreases (for wave speeds which are less than sonic), entropy decreases;
this is non-physical.
Substitute the Rayleigh line into the Hugoniot equation to get a single equation for
2
:
p
1
+
2
1
D
2
_
1
2
_
= p
1
+1
1
1
2
+1
1
1
1
. (3.227)
This equation is quadratic in
1
2
and factorizable. Use computer algebra to solve and get
two solutions, one ambient
1
2
=
1
1
and one shocked solution:
1
2
=
1
1
1
+ 1
_
1 +
2
( 1) D
2
p
1
1
_
. (3.228)
The shocked density
2
is plotted against wave speed D for CPIG air in Figure 3.9.
Note
density solution allows allows all wave speeds 0 < D < ,
plot range, however, is c
1
< D < ,
Rayleigh line and Hugoniot show D c
1
,
solution for D = D(v
p
), to be shown, rigorously shows D c
1
,
strong shock limit: D
2
,
2
( + 1)/( 1),
acoustic limit: D
2
p
1
/
1
,
2

1
, and
strong
shock
limit
calorically perfect
ideal air
= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

exact
solution
D = D
min
= c
1

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
D (m/s)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
(kg/m
3
)
Figure 3.9: Shock density versus shock wave speed for calorically perfect ideal air.
non-physical limit: D
2
0,
2
0.
Back substitute into Rayleigh line and mass conservation to solve for the shocked pressure
and the uid velocity in the shocked wave frame:
p
2
=
2
+ 1
1
D
2
1
+ 1
p
1
, (3.229)
u
2
= D
1
+ 1
_
1 +
2
( 1) D
2
p
1
1
_
. (3.230)
The shocked pressure p
2
is plotted against wave speed D for CPIG air in Figure 3.10 including
both the exact solution and the solution in the strong shock limit. Note for these parameters,
the results are indistinguishable. The shocked wave frame uid particle velocity u
2
is plotted
against wave speed D for CPIG air in Figure 3.11. The shocked wave frame uid particle
Mach number, M
2
2
=
2
u
2
2
/(p
2
), is plotted against wave speed D for CPIG air in Figure
3.12.
calorically perfect
ideal air
= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

exact
solution and
strong shock limit
ambient =
100000 Pa
D = D
min
= c
1

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
D (m/s)
6
2. 10
6
4. 10
6
6. 10
6
8. 10
p
2
(Pa)
x
x
x
x
Figure 3.10: Shock pressure versus shock wave speed for calorically perfect ideal air.
strong
shock
limit

= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

exact
solution
u
1
= - c
1

D = D
min
= c
1

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
D (m/s)
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
u
2
(m/s)
calorically perfect
ideal air
Figure 3.11: Shock wave frame uid particle velocity versus shock wave speed for calorically
perfect ideal air.
calorically perfect
ideal air
= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

exact
solution
strong
shock
limit
D = D
min
= c
1

M
2
2
= 1
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
D (m/s)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
M
2
2
Figure 3.12: Mach number squared of shocked uid particle versus shock wave speed for
calorically perfect ideal air.
Note in the steady frame that the Mach number of the
undisturbed ow is (and must be) > 1: supersonic, and
shocked ow is (and must be) < 1: subsonic.
Transform back to the laboratory frame u = v D:
v
2
D = D
1
+ 1
_
1 +
2
( 1) D
2
p
1
1
_
, (3.231)
v
2
= D D
1
+ 1
_
1 +
2
( 1) D
2
p
1
1
_
. (3.232)
Manipulate the above equation and solve the resulting quadratic equation for D and get
D =
+ 1
4
v
2
p
1
1
+ v
2
2
_
+ 1
4
_
2
. (3.233)
Now if v
2
> 0, we expect D > 0 so take positive root, also set the velocity equal to the
piston velocity v
2
= v
p
.
D =
+ 1
4
v
p
+
p
1
1
+ v
2
p
_
+ 1
4
_
2
. (3.234)
Note:
acoustic limit: as v
p
0, D c
1
; the shock speed approaches the sound speed, and
strong shock limit: as v
p
, D v
p
( + 1)/2.
The shock speed D is plotted against piston velocity v
p
for CPIG air in Figure 3.13. Both
the exact solution and strong shock limit are shown.
200 400 600 800 1000
v
p
(m/s)
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
D (m/s)
exact
solution
acoustic
limit,
D c
1

calorically perfect
ideal air
= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

strong
shock
limit
Figure 3.13: Shock speed versus piston velocity for calorically perfect ideal air.
If we dene the Mach number of the shock as
M
s

D
c
1
, (3.235)
we get
M
s
=
+ 1
4
v
p
RT
1
+
1 +
v
2
p
RT
1
_
+ 1
4
_
2
. (3.236)
The shock Mach number M
s
is plotted against piston velocity v
p
for CPIG air in Figure 3.14.
Both the exact solution and strong shock limit are shown.
200 400 600 800 1000
v
p
(m/s)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
M
s
strong
shock
limit

exact
solution
acoustic
limit,
M
s
1
calorically perfect
ideal air

= 7/5
R = 0.287 kJ/(kg K)

Figure 3.14: Shock Mach number versus piston velocity for calorically perfect ideal air.
3.3.6 Acoustic limit
Consider that state 2 is a small perturbation of state 1 so that
2
=
1
+ , (3.237)
u
2
= u
1
+ u
1
, (3.238)
p
2
= p
1
+ p. (3.239)
Substituting into the normal shock equations, we get
(
1
+ ) (u
1
+ u) =
1
u
1
, (3.240)
(
1
+ ) (u
1
+ u)
2
+ (p
1
+ p) =
1
u
1
2
+ p
1
, (3.241)
1
p
1
+ p
1
+
+
1
2
(u
1
+ u)
2
=

1
p
1
1
+
1
2
u
1
2
. (3.242)
Expanding, we get
1
u
1
+ u
1
() +
1
(u) + () (u) =
1
u
1
_
1
u
1
2
+ 2
1
u
1
(u) + u
1
2
() +
1
(u)
2
+ 2u
1
(u) () + () (u)
2
_
+(p
1
+ p) =
1
u
1
2
+ p
1
1
_
p
1
1
+
1
1
P
p
1
2
1
+ ...
_
+
1
2
_
u
1
2
+ 2u
1
(u) + (u)
2
_
=

1
p
1
1
+
1
2
u
1
2
Subtracting the base state and eliminating products of small quantities yields
u
1
() +
1
(u) = 0, (3.243)
2
1
u
1
(u) + u
1
2
() + p = 0, (3.244)
1
_
1
1
p
p
1
2
1
_
+ u
1
(u) = 0. (3.245)
In matrix form this is
_
_
u
1

1
0
u
1
2
2
1
u
1
1

1
p
1
2
1
u
1
1
1
1
_
_
_
_
u
p
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (3.246)
As the right hand side is zero, the determinant must be zero and there must be a linear
dependency of the solution. First check the determinant:
u
1
_
2
1
u
1
u
1
_
1
_

1
u
1
2
1
+

1
p
1
2
1
_
= 0, (3.247)
u
1
2
1
(2 ( 1))
1
1
_
u
1
2
+
p
1
1
_
= 0, (3.248)
u
1
2
( + 1)
_
u
1
2
+
p
1
1
_
= 0, (3.249)
u
1
2
=
p
1
1
= c
2
1
. (3.250)
So the velocity is necessarily sonic for a small disturbance.
Take u to be known and solve a resulting 2 2 system:
_
u
1
0

1
p
1
2
1
1
1
1
__
p
_
=
_
1
u
u
1
u
_
. (3.251)
Solving yields
=

1
u
_
p
1
1
=
1
u
c
1
(3.252)
p =
1
_
p
1
1
u =
1
c
1
u. (3.253)
3.4. FLOW WITH AREA CHANGE AND NORMAL SHOCKS 227
3.4 Flow with area change and normal shocks
This section will consider ow from a reservoir with the uid at stagnation conditions to a
constant pressure environment. The pressure of the environment is commonly known as the
back pressure: p
b
.
Generic problem: Given A(x), stagnation conditions and p
b
, nd the pressure, tempera-
ture, density at all points in the duct and the mass ow rate.
3.4.1 Converging nozzle
A converging nozzle operating at several dierent values of p
b
is sketched in Figure 3.15. The
p
b

p
e

p
o

x
p(x)/p
o

1
p*/p o
a--subsonic exit
b--subsonic exit
c--sonic exit
d--choked, external expansion
e--choked, external expansion
p
b
/p
o

m/mmax
. .
1
1
0
x
e

p*/p
o

a
b
c
d e
Figure 3.15: Converging nozzle sketch.
ow through the duct can be solved using the following procedure:
check if p
b
p
,
if so, set p
e
= p
b
,
determine M
e
from isentropic ow relations,
determine A
from A/A
relation,
at any point in the ow where A is known, compute A/A
and then invert A/A
relation
to nd local M.
Note:
These ows are subsonic throughout and correspond to points a and b in Figure 3.15.
If p
b
= p
then the ow is sonic at the exit and just choked. This corresponds to point
c in Figure 3.15.
If p
b
< p
, then the ow chokes, is sonic at the exit, and continues to expand outside
of the nozzle. This corresponds to points d and e in Figure 3.15.
3.4.2 Converging-diverging nozzle
A converging-diverging nozzle operating at several dierent values of p
b
is sketched in Figure
3.16.
x
p(x)/p
o

1
p*/p
o

a--subsonic exit
b--subsonic exit
c--subsonic design
x
e

p
b

p
e

p
o
p
t

possible
normal
shock
x
t

d--shock in duct
e-shock at end of duct
f--external compression
g--supersonic design
h--external expansion
sonic
throat
p
b
/ p
o

m/mmax
. .
1
1
0
p*/p
o

a
b
c d e f

g h
Figure 3.16: Converging-diverging nozzle sketch.
The ow through the duct can be solved using the a very similar following procedure
3.5. RAREFACTIONS AND THE METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS 229
set A
t
= A
,
with this assumption, calculate A
e
/A
,
determine M
esub
, M
esup
, both supersonic and subsonic, from A/A
relation,
determine p
esub
, p
esup
, from M
esub
, M
esup
; these are the supersonic and subsonic design
pressures,
if p
b
> p
esub
, the ow is subsonic throughout and the throat is not sonic. Use same
procedure as for converging duct: Determine M
e
by setting p
e
= p
b
and using isentropic
relations,
if p
esub
> p
b
> p
esup
, the procedure is complicated.
estimate the pressure with a normal shock at the end of the duct, p
esh
.
If p
b
p
esh
, there is a normal shock inside the duct,
If p
b
< p
esh
, the duct ow is shockless, and there may be compression outside the
duct.
if p
esup
= p
b
, the ow is at supersonic design conditions and the ow is shockless, and
if p
b
< p
esup
, the ow in the duct is isentropic and there is expansion outside the duct.
3.5 Rarefactions and the method of characteristics
Here we discuss how to model expansion waves in a one-dimensional unsteady, inviscid, non-
heat conducting uid. This analysis is a good deal more rigorous than much of traditional
one-dimensional gas dynamics, and draws upon some of the more dicult mathematical
methods we will encounter.
In assuming no diusive transport, we have eliminated all mechanisms for entropy gen-
eration; consequently, we will be able to model the process as isentropic. We note that even
without diusion, shocks can generate entropy. However, the expansion waves are inherently
continuous, and do remain isentropic. We will consider a general equation of state, and
later specialize to a calorically perfect ideal gas. The problem is inherently non-linear and
is modeled by partial dierential equations of the type which is known as hyperbolic. Such
problems, in contrast to say Laplaces equation, which requires boundary conditions, require
initial data only, and no boundary data.
3.5.1 Inviscid one-dimensional equations
The equations to be considered are shown here in non-conservative form
t
+ u
x
+
u
x
= 0, (3.254)
u
t
+ u
u
x
+
p
x
= 0, (3.255)
s
t
+ u
s
x
= 0, (3.256)
p = p(, s). (3.257)
Here we have written the energy equation in terms of entropy. The development of this was
shown in Chapter 1. We have also utilized the general result from thermodynamics that any
intensive property can be written as a function of two other independent thermodynamic
properties. Here we have chosen to write pressure as a function of density and entropy. Thus
we have four equations for the four unknowns, , u, p, s.
Now we note that
dp =
p
s
d +
p
s
ds, so, (3.258)

p
x
t
=
p
t
+
p
s
s
x
t
. (3.259)
Now, let us dene thermodynamic properties c
2
and as follows
c
2
s
,
p
s
. (3.260)
We will see that will be unimportant, and will be able to ascribe to c
2
the physical
signicance of the speed of propagation of small disturbances, the so-called sound speed,
which we have already encountered in acoustics. If we know the equation of state, then we
can think of c
2
and as known thermodynamic functions of and s. Our denitions give us
p
x
= c
2
x
+
s
x
. (3.261)
Substituting into our governing equations, we see that pressure can be eliminated to give
three equations in three unknowns:
t
+ u
x
+
u
x
= 0, (3.262)
u
t
+ u
u
x
+ c
2
x
+
s
x
= 0, (3.263)
s
t
+ u
s
x
= 0. (3.264)
Now if s/t + u(s/x) = 0, we can say that if s = s(x, t),
ds =
s
t
dt +
s
x
dx, (3.265)
ds
dt
=
s
t
+
dx
dt
s
x
. (3.266)
Thus, on curves where dx/dt = u, we have from substituting Eq. (3.266) into the energy
equation (3.264)
ds
dt
= 0. (3.267)
Thus we have converted the partial dierential equation into an ordinary dierential equa-
tion. This can be integrated to give us
s = C, on a particle pathline,
dx
dt
= u. (3.268)
This scenario is sketched on the so-called x t diagram of Figure 3.17.
x
t
s = s
0
s = s
1
s = s
2
s = s
3
s = s
4
pathlines
Figure 3.17: xt diagram showing maintenance of entropy s along particle pathlines
dx
dt
= u
for isentropic ow.
This result is satisfying, but not complete, as we do not in general know where the
pathlines are. Let us try to apply this technique to the system in general. Consider our
equations in matrix form:
_
_
1 0 0
0 0
0 0 1
_
_
_
_
t
u
t
s
t
_
_
+
_
_
u 0
c
2
u
0 0 u
_
_
_
_
x
u
x
s
x
_
_
=
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
. (3.269)
These equations are of the form
A
ij
u
j
t
+ B
ij
u
j
x
= C
i
. (3.270)
As described by Whitham,
7
there is a general technique to analyze such equations. First
pre-multiply both sides of the equation by a yet to be determined vector of variables
i
:
i
A
ij
u
j
t
+
i
B
ij
u
j
x
=
i
C
i
. (3.271)
Now, this method will work if we can choose
i
to render the above product to be of the
form similar to /t + u(/x). Let us take
i
A
ij
u
j
t
+
i
B
ij
u
j
x
= m
j
_
u
j
t
+
u
j
x
_
, (3.272)
= m
j
du
j
dt
on
dx
dt
= . (3.273)
So comparing terms, we see that
i
A
ij
= m
j
,
i
B
ij
= m
j
, (3.274)
i
A
ij
= m
j
, (3.275)
so, we get by eliminating m
j
that
i
(A
ij
B
ij
) = 0. (3.276)
This is a left eigenvalue problem. We set the determinant of A
ij
B
ij
to zero for a non-trivial
solution and nd
u 0
c
2
( u)
0 0 u
= 0. (3.277)
Evaluating, we get
( u)
_
( u)
2
_
+ ( u)(c
2
) = 0, (3.278)
( u)
_
( u)
2
c
2
_
= 0. (3.279)
Solving we get
= u, = u c. (3.280)
7
Gerald Beresford Whitham, 1927-, applied mathematician and developer of theory for non-linear wave
propagation.
Now the left eigenvectors
i
give us the actual equations. First for = u, we get
(
1

2

3
)
_
_
u u 0
c
2
(u u)
0 0 u u
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) , (3.281)
(
1

2

3
)
_
_
0 0
c
2
0
0 0 0
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) . (3.282)
Two of the equations require that
1
= 0 and
2
= 0. There is no restriction on
3
. We will
select a normalized solution so that
i
= (0, 0, 1). (3.283)
Thus
i
A
ij
(u
j
/t) +
i
B
ij
(u
j
/x) =
i
C
i
gives
( 0 0 1 )
_
_
1 0 0
0 0
0 0 1
_
_
_
_
t
u
t
s
t
_
_
+ ( 0 0 1 )
_
_
u 0
c
2
u
0 0 u
_
_
_
_
x
u
x
s
x
_
_
= ( 0 0 1 )
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
,
( 0 0 1 )
_
_
t
u
t
s
t
_
_
+ ( 0 0 u)
_
_
x
u
x
s
x
_
_
= 0,
s
t
+ u
s
x
= 0. (3.284)
So as before with s = s(x, t), we have ds = (s/t)dt + (s/x)dx, and ds/dt = s/t +
(dx/dt)(s/x). Now if we require dx/dt to be a particle pathline, dx/dt = u, then our
energy equation gives us
ds
dt
= 0, on
dx
dt
= u. (3.285)
The special case in which the pathlines are straight in xt space, corresponding to a uniform
velocity eld of u(x, t) = u
o
, is sketched in the x t diagram of Figure 3.18.
Now let us look at the remaining eigenvalues, = u c.
(
1

2

3
)
_
_
u c u 0
c
2
(u c u)
0 0 u c u
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) , (3.286)
(
1

2

3
)
_
_
c 0
c
2
c
0 0 c
_
_
= ( 0 0 0 ) . (3.287)
As one of the components of the left eigenvector should be arbitrary, we will take
1
= 1; we
arrive at the following equations then
c c
2
2
= 0, =
2
=
1
c
, (3.288)
x
t
pathlines
s = s
1
s = s
0
s = s
2
s = s
3
s = s
4
u
o
1
Figure 3.18: x t diagram showing maintenance of entropy s along particle pathlines
dx/dt = u
o
for isentropic ow.
c
2
= 0, =
2
=
1
c
, (3.289)
2
c
3
= 0, =
3
=

c
2
. (3.290)
Thus
i
A
ij
(u
j
/t) +
i
B
ij
(u
j
/x) =
i
C
i
gives
( 1
1
c
c
2
)
_
_
1 0 0
0 0
0 0 1
_
_
_
_
t
u
t
s
t
_
_
+ ( 1
1
c
c
2
)
_
_
u 0
c
2
u
0 0 u
_
_
_
_
x
u
x
s
x
_
_
= ( 1
1
c
c
2
)
_
_
0
0
0
_
_
,
( 1
c
2
)
_
_
t
u
t
s
t
_
_
+ ( u c
u
c

c
+
u
c
2
)
_
_
x
u
x
s
x
_
_
= 0,
t
+ (u c)
x

c
u
t
+
_
1
u
c
_
u
x
+

c
2
s
t
+
_
u
c
2

c
_
s
x
= 0, (3.291)
_
t
+ (u c)
x
_

c
_
u
t
+ (u c)
u
x
_
+

c
2
_
s
t
+ (u c)
s
x
_
= 0, (3.292)
c
2
_
t
+ (u c)
x
_
c
_
u
t
+ (u c)
u
x
_
+
_
s
t
+ (u c)
s
x
_
= 0. (3.293)
Now on lines where dx/dt = uc, we get a transformation of the partial dierential equations
to ordinary dierential equations:
c
2
d
dt
c
du
dt
+
ds
dt
= 0, on
dx
dt
= u c. (3.294)
A sketch of the characteristics, the lines on which the dierential equations are obtained,
are sketched in the x t diagram of Figure 3.19.
x
t
dx
dt
__
= u+ c = u- c
dx
dt
__
dx
dt
__
= u
acoustic
characteristic
acoustic
characteristic
pathline
characteristic
Figure 3.19: x t diagram showing characteristics for pathlines dx/dt = u and acoustic
waves dx/dt = u c.
3.5.2 Homeoentropic ow of an ideal gas
The equations developed so far are valid for a general equation of state. Here let us now
consider the ow of a calorically perfect ideal gas, so p = RT and e = c
v
T + e. Further
let us take the ow to be homeoentropic, that is to say, not only does the entropy remain
constant on pathlines, which is isentropic, but it has the same value on each streamline.
That is the entropy eld is a constant. Consequently, we have the standard relations for a
calorically perfect ideal gas:
c
2
=
p
, (3.295)
p
= A, (3.296)
where A is a constant. Because of homeoentropy, we no longer need consider the energy
equation, and the linear combination of mass and linear momentum equations reduces to
c
2
d
dt
c
du
dt
= 0, on
dx
dt
= u c. (3.297)
Rearranging, we get
du
dt
=
d
dt
c
, on
dx
dt
= u c. (3.298)
Now c
2
= p/ = A
1
, and c =
A
1
2
, so
du
dt
=
_
A
1
2
1
d
dt
=
_
A
2
1
d
dt
_
1
2
_
. (3.299)
Regrouping, we nd
d
dt
_
u
_
A
2
1
1
2
_
= 0, (3.300)
d
dt
_
u
2
1
c
_
= 0. (3.301)
Following notation used by Courant
8
and Friedrichs,
9
we then integrate each of these equa-
tions, which are homogeneous, along characteristics to obtain algebraic relations
u +
2
1
c = 2r, on
dx
dt
= u + c, C
+
characteristic, (3.302)
u
2
1
c = 2s, on
dx
dt
= u c, C
characteristic. (3.303)
A sketch of the characteristics is given in the x t diagram of Figure 3.20. Now r and
s can take on dierent values, depending on which characteristic we are on. On a given
characteristic, they remain constant. Let us dene additional parameters and to identify
which characteristic we are on. So we have
u +
2
1
c = 2r(), on
dx
dt
= u + c, C
+
characteristic, (3.304)
u
2
1
c = 2s(), on
dx
dt
= u c, C
characteristic. (3.305)
These quantities are known as Riemann invariants.
10
8
Richard Courant, 1888-1972, Prussian-born German mathematician, received Ph.D. under David Hilbert
at Gottingen, compiled Hilberts course notes into classic two-volume text of applied mathematics, drafted
into German army in World War I, where half of his unit was killed in action, developed telegraph system
which used the earth as a conductor for use in the trenches of the Western front, expelled from Gottingen
by the Nazis in 1933, ed Germany, and founded the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New
York University, author of classic mathematical text on supersonic uid mechanics.
9
Kurt Otto Friedrichs, 1901-1982, German-born mathematician who emigrated to the United States in
1937, student of Richard Courants at Gottingen, taught at Aachen, Braunschweig, and New York University,
worked on partial dierential equations of mathematical physics and uid mechanics.
10
Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, 1826-1866, German mathematician and geometer whose work in
non-Euclidian geometry was critical to Einsteins theory of general relativity, produced the rst major study
of shock waves.
x
t
arbitrary region
of interest
C
+
dx
dt
__
= u+ c on C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
-
C
-
C
-
dx
dt
__
= u - c on C
-
Figure 3.20: x t diagram showing C
+
and C
characteristics dx/dt = u c.
3.5.3 Simple waves
Simple waves are dened to exist when either r() or s() are constant everywhere in x t
space and not just on characteristics. For example say s() = s
o
. Then the Riemann
invariant
u
2
1
c = 2s
o
, (3.306)
is actually invariant over all of x t space. Now the other Riemann invariant,
u +
2
1
c = 2r(), (3.307)
takes on many values depending on . However, it is easily shown that for the simple wave
that the characteristics have a constant slope in the x t plane as sketched in the x t
diagram of Figure 3.21.
Now consider a rarefaction with a prescribed piston motion u = u
p
(t). A sketch is given
in the x t diagram of Figure 3.22.
For this conguration, the Riemann invariant u
2
1
c = 2s
o
is valid everywhere. Now
when t = 0, we have u = 0, c = c
o
, so
u
2
1
c =
2
1
c
o
. (3.308)
Consider now a special characteristic

C
+
at t =

t. At this time the piston moves with
velocity u
p
, and the uid velocity at the piston face is
u
face
(
t) = u
p
. (3.309)
x
t
arbitrary region
of interest
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
+
for a simple wave.
We get c
face
(
t) from Eq. (3.308):

u
face
..
u
p
2
1
c
face
=
2
1
c
o
, (3.310)
c
face
(t =

t) = c
o
+
1
2
u
p
. (3.311)
Also from Eq. (3.308), we have
c = c
o
+
1
2
u, (3.312)
which is valid everywhere.
Now on

C
+
, we have
u +
2
1
c =
_
u
face
+
2
1
c
face
_
t=
t
, (3.313)
u +
2
1
_
c
o
+
1
2
u
_
= u
p
+
2
1
_
c
o
+
1
2
u
p
_
, (3.314)
2u +
2
1
c
o
= 2 u
p
+
2
1
c
o
, (3.315)
u = u
p
on

C
+
. (3.316)
So on

C
+
, we have
c = c
o
+
1
2
u
p
. (3.317)
x
t
u (t)
p
C
+
C
+
: u + c = 2 r ( )
2
+ 1
______
1
C
+
: u + c = 2 r ( )
2
+ 1
______
2
C
+
: u + c = 2 r ( )
2
+ 1
______
3
u (t)
p
x=0
+
characteristics for isentropic rarefaction problem,
along with piston cylinder arrangement.
So for

C
+
, we get
dx
dt
= u + c = u
p
+ c
o
+
1
2
u
p
=
+ 1
2
u
p
+ c
o
. (3.318)
for a particular characteristic, this slope is a constant, as was earlier suggested.
Now for prescribed motion, u
p
decreases with time and becomes more negative; hence
the slope of our

C
+
characteristic decreases, and they diverge in x t space. The slope of
the leading characteristic is c
o
, the ambient sound speed. The characteristic we consider,
C
+
, along with a few other is sketched in the x t diagram of Figure 3.23. We can use our
Riemann invariant along with isentropic relations to obtain other ow variables. From Eq.
(3.308), we get
c
c
o
= 1 +
1
2
u
c
o
. (3.319)
Since the ow is homeoentropic, we have c/c
o
= (/
o
)
1
2
and p/p
o
= (/
o
)
, so
p
p
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
u
c
o
_ 2
1
, (3.320)
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
u
c
o
_ 2
1
. (3.321)
x
t
u (t)
p
C
+
u
p
u ( ) = u
p face
t
c ( ) = c +
- 1
2
face
t
o
u
p
t
Figure 3.23: x t diagram showing

C
+
for our rarefaction problem.
3.5.4 Prandtl-Meyer rarefaction
If the piston is suddenly accelerated to a constant velocity, then a family of characteristics
clusters at the origin on the x t diagram and fan out in a centered rarefaction fan also
called a Prandtl-Meyer
11
This can also be studied using the similarity transformation = x/t
which reduces the partial dierential equations to ordinary dierential equations. Relevant
sketches comparing Prandtl-Meyer fans to non-centered rarefactions are shown in in the xt
diagram of Figure 3.24.
Example 3.4
Analyze a centered Prandtl-Meyer fan into calorically perfect ideal air for a piston suddenly accel-
erated from rest to u
p
= 100 m/s. Take the ambient air to be at p
o
= 100 kPa, T
o
= 300 K.
The ideal gas law gives
o
=
po
RTo
=
100 kPa
(287 J/kg/K)(300 K)
= 1.16 kg/m
3
. Now
c
o
=
_
RT
o
=
7
5
_
287
J
kg K
_
(300 K) = 347 m/s. (3.322)
On the nal characteristic of the fan, C
+
f
: u = u
p
= 100
m
s
. So
c = c
o
+
1
2
u
p
=
_
347
m
s
_
+
7/5 1
2
_
100
m
s
_
= 327
m
s
. (3.323)
Now the nal pressure is
p
f
p
o
=
_
1 +
1
2
u
f
c
o
_
2
1
=
_
1 +
7/5 1
2
_
100
m
s
_
347
m
s
_
2(7/5)
7/51
= 0.660 (3.324)
11
Theodor Meyer, 1882-1972, graduate student of Prandtls at Gottingen who in his 1908 dissertation gave
the rst practical development of both two-dimensional expansion waves and oblique shock waves rarefaction.
u
p
x
t
u (t)
p
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
particle path
x
t
u
p
particle path
u
x
p
x
C
+
C
+
C
+ C
+
C
+
C
+
Prandtl-Meyer Rarefaction
0
Figure 3.24: xt diagram centered and non-centered rarefactions, along with pressure and
velocity proles for Prandtl-Meyer fans.
Hence p
f
= 66.0 kPa. Since the ow is homeoentropic, we get
f
=
o
_
p
f
p
o
_1
=
_
1.16
kg
m
3
_
(.660)
5/7
= 0.863
kg
m
3
. (3.325)
And the nal temperature is
T
f
=
p
f
f
R
=
66.0 10
3
Pa
(0.863 kg/m
3
)(287 J/kg/K)
= 266.5 K. (3.326)
Recall from linear theory that

o
u
c
o
, p
o
c
o
u, T ( 1)T
o
u
c
o
. (3.327)
We compare the results of this problem with the estimates of linear acoustic theory and see
exact
= 0.298
kg
m
3
,
linear
= 0.334
kg
m
3
, (3.328)
p
exact
= 34 kPa, p
linear
= 40.3 kPa, (3.329)
T
exact
= 33.5 K, T
linear
= 34.6 K. (3.330)
3.5.5 Simple compression
We sketch a simple compression in the x t diagram of Figure 3.25.
x
t
u (t)
p
C
+
u (t)
p
x=0
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
ambient
region
shock
formation
Figure 3.25: x t diagram for simple compression.
3.5.6 Two interacting expansions
We sketch two interacting expansion waves in the x t diagram of Figure 3.26.
3.5.7 Wall interactions
We sketch an expansion wall interaction in the x t diagram of Figure 3.27.
3.5.8 Shock tube
We sketch the behavior of a shock tube in the diagrams of Figure 3.28.
u (t)
p
x=0
x
t
x=L
x=L
fluid
at rest
uniform
flow
uniform
flow
uniform
flow
u (t)
p
u (t)
p
Figure 3.26: x t diagram for two interacting expansion waves.
u (t)
p
x=0
x
t
x=L
x=L
u (t)
p
flow
at rest
uniform
flow
rest
Figure 3.27: x t diagram for expansion wall interaction.
x
t
x=L
rest rest
uniform
uniform
rest
rest
shock
rarefaction
contact
discontinuity
compression
x
p
t = 0
x
p
t > 0
x
t > 0
x
t > 0
Figure 3.28: x t and p, , T versus x behavior for a shock tube.
3.5.9 Final note on method of characteristics
We have described here a common and traditional approach to the method of characteristics
(MOC). Using common notation, we have written what began as partial dierential equations
(PDEs) in the form of ordinary dierential equations (ODEs), and it is often said that the
method of characteristics is a way to transform PDEs into ODEs. However, the equations
which result are certainly not in a standard form for ODEs; they are burdened with unusual
side conditions.
It is in fact more sound to state that the MOC transforms the PDEs in (x, t) space to
another set of PDEs in a new space (r, s) in which the integration is much easier. Consider
for example a model equation which is hyperbolic, the inviscid Burgers equation:
u
t
+ u
u
x
= 0. (3.331)
Now consider a general transformation (x, t) (r, s). Applying the chain rule, we get
u
t
=
u
r
r
t
+
u
s
s
t
, (3.332)
u
x
=
u
r
r
x
+
u
s
s
x
. (3.333)
In transformed space, the inviscid Burgers equation becomes
u
r
r
t
+
u
s
s
t
+ u
_
u
r
r
x
+
u
s
s
x
_
= 0. (3.334)
Now we also have
dx =
x
r
dr +
x
s
ds, (3.335)
dt =
t
r
dr +
t
s
ds. (3.336)
With the Jacobian
12
J =
x
r
t
s

x
s
t
r
, (3.337)
we invert to nd
dr =
1
J
_
t
s
dx
x
s
dt
_
, (3.338)
ds =
1
J
_
t
r
dx +
x
r
dt
_
. (3.339)
12
Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi, 1804-1851, Prussian born, prolic German mathematician. The Jacobian
determinant was extensively studied by Jacobi, but rst identied by Cauchy.
So it is easy to see that we get the following for the partial derivatives
r
t
=
1
J
x
s
,
r
x
=
1
J
t
s
, (3.340)
s
t
=
1
J
x
r
,
s
x
=
1
J
t
r
. (3.341)
Substituting into the inviscid Burgers equation, we get
1
J
_
u
r
x
s
+
u
s
x
r
+ u
_
u
r
t
s

u
s
t
r
__
= 0, (3.342)
u
r
x
s
+
u
s
x
r
+ u
u
r
t
s
u
u
s
t
r
= 0. (3.343)
Up to this point we have a perfectly general transformation and a perfectly general inviscid
Burgers equation, now cast in the transformed space. Let us now demand of our transfor-
mation that
x
s
= u
t
s
, t(x, s) = s. (3.344)
The rst of these says that on any line on which r is a constant that for a given change in
s, the ratio of the change in x to that in t will be equal to u. This is a generalization of our
more standard statement that on characteristics, dx/dt = u. The second is a convenience,
and we actually need not be as restrictive. With this specication, our inviscid Burgers
equation becomes
u
r
x
s
..
= u
t
s
= u
+
u
s
x
r
+ u
u
r
t
s
..
=1
u
u
s
t
r
..
=0
= 0, (3.345)
u
u
r
+
u
s
x
r
+ u
u
r
= 0, (3.346)
u
s
x
r
= 0. (3.347)
Now, let us require that x/r = 0; hence in this special transformed space, we have that
u
s
= 0. (3.348)
This has solution
u = f(r), (3.349)
where f(r) is an arbitrary function. We now substitute this into x/s = u(t/s) to get
x
s
= f(r)
t
s
, (3.350)
which can be integrated to get
x = f(r)t + g(r). (3.351)
Now substituting t = s and setting g(r) = r arbitrarily so that our transformation maps x
into r when t = s = 0, we get
x = f(r)s + r. (3.352)
In summary we can write a solution parametrically in terms of our transformed space as
u(r, s) = f(r), (3.353)
x(r, s) = f(r)s + r, (3.354)
t(r, s) = s. (3.355)
So given an initial distribution of u, we can select a domain in (r, s) and parametrically
determine u as a function of x and t. While this formulation maps every (r, s) into (u, x, t),
we cannot be assured that in physical space that the same (x, t) may not map into non-
unique values of u! This multi-valuedness actually indicates that a shock has formed, and
correct insertion of a shock will eliminate the diculty.
Example 3.5
If we have the inviscid Burgers equation u/t +u(u/x) = 0 with u(x, 0) = sin(x), nd u, and
plot u(x) for t = 0, 1, 2.
When t = s = 0, we have x = r, so f(r) = sin(r), and our solution is
u(r, s) = sin(r), (3.356)
x(r, s) = s sin(r) + r, (3.357)
t(r, s) = s. (3.358)
We can use this solution to form parametric plots and eectively form u(x) for various values of t.
These are shown in Figure 3.29. It is clear that as time advances the left side of the wave is attening
and the right side is steepening. The left side is undergoing what is equivalent to a rarefaction, and the
right side is undergoing what is equivalent to a compression. At t = 3, the wave has steepened enough
so that u is a multivalued function of x. In a physical problem, this would indicate that a shock has
formed.
This procedure can be extended to the Euler equations, though it is somewhat more com-
plicated. For isentropic Euler equations, Courant and Friedrichs give some special solutions
for rarefactions.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
u
t=0
t=1
t=2
Figure 3.29: u(x) for t = 0, 1, 2 for inviscid Burgers equation problem.
Chapter 4
Potential ow
see Panton, Chapter 18
see Yih, Chapter 4
This chapter will consider potential ow. A good deal of highly developed and beautiful
mathematical theory was generated for potential ows in the nineteenth century. Addition-
ally, these solutions can be applied in highly disparate elds, as the equations governing
potential ow of a uid are identical in form to those governing some forms of energy and
mass diusion, as well as electro-magnetics.
Despite its beauty, in some ways it is impractical for many engineering applications,
though not all. As the theory necessarily ignores all vorticity generating mechanisms, it
must ignore viscous eects. Consequently, the theory is incapable of predicting drag forces
on solid bodies. Consequently, those who needed to know the drag, resorted in the nineteenth
century to far more empirically based methods.
In the early twentieth century, Prandtl took steps to reconcile the practical viscous world
of engineering with the more mathematical world of potential ow with his viscous boundary
layer theory. He showed that indeed potential ow solutions could be of great value away
from no-slip walls, and provided a recipe to x the solutions in the neighborhood of the wall.
In so doing, he opened up a new eld of applied mathematics known as matched asymptotic
analysis.
So why study potential ows? The following arguments oer some justication.
portions of real ow elds are well described by this theory, and those that are not can
often be remedied by application of a viscous boundary layer theory,
study of potential ow solutions can give great insight into uid behavior and aid in
the honing of a more precise intuition,
fundamental solutions are useful as test cases for verication of numerical methods,
and
there is pedantic and historical value in knowing potential ow.
249
250 CHAPTER 4. POTENTIAL FLOW
4.1 Stream functions and velocity potentials
We rst consider stream functions and velocity potentials. We have seen velocity potentials
before in study of ideal vortices. In this chapter, we will adopt the same assumption of
irrotationality, and further require that the ow be two-dimensional. Recall if a ow velocity
is conned to the x y plane, then the vorticity vector is conned to the z direction and
takes the form
=
_
_
0
0
v
x

u
y
_
_
. (4.1)
Now if the ow is two-dimensional and irrotational, we have
v
x

u
y
= 0. (4.2)
Moreover, because of irrotationality, we can express the velocity vector v as the gradient of
a potential , the velocity potential:
v = . (4.3)
Note that with this denition, uid ows from regions of low velocity potential to regions of
high velocity potential. Thus,
u =

x
, (4.4)
v =

y
. (4.5)
We see by substitution into the equation for vorticity, that this is true identically:
v
x

u
y
=

x
_
y
_

y
_
x
_
= 0. (4.6)
Now for two-dimensional incompressible ows, we have
u
x
+
v
y
= 0. (4.7)
Substituting for u and v in favor of , we get
x
_
x
_
+

y
_
y
_
= 0, (4.8)
2
= 0. (4.9)
Now if the ow is incompressible, we can also dene the stream function as follows:
u =

y
, v =
x
. (4.10)
4.1. STREAM FUNCTIONS AND VELOCITY POTENTIALS 251
Direct substitution into the mass conservation equation shows that this yields an identity:
u
x
+
v
y
=

x
_
y
_
+

y
_
x
_
= 0. (4.11)
Now, in an equation which will be critically important soon, we can set our denitions of u
and v in terms of and equal to each other, as they must be:
x
..
u
=

y
..
u
, (4.12)
y
..
v
=
x
. .
v
. (4.13)
Now if we dierentiate the rst equation with respect to y, and the second with respect to
x we see
yx
=

2
y
2
, (4.14)
xy
=
x
2
, (4.15)
now subtract the second from the rst to get (4.16)
0 =

2
y
2
+

2
x
2
, (4.17)
2
= 0. (4.18)
Let us know examine lines of constant (equipotential lines) and lines of constant
(which we will see are streamlines). So take = C
1
, = C
2
. For we get
d =

x
dx +

y
dy = 0, (4.19)
d = udx + vdy = 0, (4.20)
dy
dx
=C
1
=
u
v
. (4.21)
Now for we similarly get
d =

x
dx +

y
dy = 0, (4.22)
d = vdx + udy = 0, (4.23)
dy
dx
=C
2
=
v
u
(4.24)
We note two features
dy
dx
=C
1
=
1
dy
dx
|
=C
2
; hence, lines of constant are orthogonal to lines of constant ,
and
on = C
2
, we see that dx/u = dy/v; hence, lines of = C
2
must be streamlines.
As an aside, we note that the denition of the stream function u = /y, v = /x,
can be rewritten as
y
=
dx
dt
,

x
=
dy
dt
. (4.25)
This is a common form from classical dynamics in which we can interpret as the Hamil-
tonian
1
of the system. We shall not pursue this path, but note that a signicant literature
exists for Hamiltonian systems.
Now the study of and is essentially kinematics. The only incursion of dynamics is that
we must have irrotational ow. Recalling the Helmholtz equation, Eq. (2.132), we realize that
we can only have potential ow when the vorticity generating mechanisms (three-dimensional
eects, non-conservative body forces, baroclinic eects, and viscous eects) are suppressed.
In that case, the dynamics, that is the driving force for the uid motion, can be understood
in the context of the unsteady Bernoulli equation, Eq. (1.956, taken for incompressible ow
and negligible body force, in which limit, Eq. (1.947) reduces to = p/:
t
+
1
2
()
T
+
p
= f(t). (4.26)
Note that we do not have to require steady ow to have a potential ow eld. It is also easy
to correct for the presence of a conservative body force.
Now solutions to the two key equations of potential ow
2
= 0,
2
= 0, are most e-
ciently studied using methods involving complex variables. We will delay discussing solutions
until we have reviewed the necessary mathematics.
4.2 Mathematics of complex variables
Here we briey introduce relevant elements of complex variable theory. Recall that the
imaginary number i is dened such that
i
2
= 1, i =
1. (4.27)
1
William Rowan Hamilton, 1805-1865, Anglo-Irish mathematician.
4.2. MATHEMATICS OF COMPLEX VARIABLES 253
4.2.1 Eulers formula
We can get a very useful formula Eulers formula, by considering the following Taylor
2
expansions of common functions about t = 0:
e
t
= 1 + t +
1
2!
t
2
+
1
3!
t
3
+
1
4!
t
4
+
1
5!
t
5
. . . , (4.28)
sin t = 0 + t + 0
1
2!
t
2
1
3!
t
3
+ 0
1
4!
t
4
+
1
5!
t
5
. . . , (4.29)
cos t = 1 + 0t
1
2!
t
2
+ 0
1
3!
t
3
+
1
4!
t
4
+ 0
1
5!
t
5
. . . (4.30)
With these expansions now consider the following combinations: (cos t + i sin t)
t=
and
e
t
|
t=i
:
cos + i sin = 1 + i
1
2!
2
i
1
3!
3
+
1
4!
4
+ i
1
5!
5
+ . . . , (4.31)
e
i
= 1 + i +
1
2!
(i)
2
+
1
3!
(i)
3
+
1
4!
(i)
4
+
1
5!
(i)
5
+ . . . , (4.32)
= 1 + i
1
2!
2
i
1
3!
3
+
1
4!
4
+ i
1
5!
5
+ . . . (4.33)
As the two series are identical, we have Eulers formula
e
i
= cos + i sin . (4.34)
4.2.2 Polar and Cartesian representations
Now if we take x and y to be real numbers and dene the complex number z to be
z = x + iy, (4.35)
we can multiply and divide by
_
x
2
+ y
2
to obtain
z =
_
x
2
+ y
2
_
x
_
x
2
+ y
2
+ i
y
_
x
2
+ y
2
_
. (4.36)
Noting the similarities between this and the transformation between Cartesian and polar
coordinates suggests we adopt
r =
_
x
2
+ y
2
, cos =
x
_
x
2
+ y
2
, sin =
y
_
x
2
+ y
2
. (4.37)
2
Brook Taylor, 1685-1731, English mathematician and artist, Cambridge educated, published on capillary
action, magnetism, and thermometers, adjudicated the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over priority
in developing calculus, contributed to the method of nite dierences, invented integration by parts, name
ascribed to Taylor series of which variants were earlier discovered by Gregory, Newton, Leibniz, Johann
Bernoulli, and de Moivre.
x
i y
x
y
r

=

x

+

y
2
2
Figure 4.1: Polar and Cartesian representation of a complex number z.

Thus we have
z = r (cos + i sin ) , (4.38)
z = re
i
. (4.39)
The polar and Cartesian representation of a complex number z is shown in Figure 4.1.
Now we can dene the complex conjugate z as
z = x iy, (4.40)
z =
_
x
2
+ y
2
_
x
_
x
2
+ y
2
i
y
_
x
2
+ y
2
_
, (4.41)
z = r (cos i sin ) , (4.42)
z = r (cos() + i sin()) , (4.43)
z = re
i
. (4.44)
Note now that
zz = (x + iy)(x iy) = x
2
+ y
2
= |z|
2
, (4.45)
= re
i
re
i
= r
2
= |z|
2
. (4.46)
We also have
sin =
e
i
e
i
2i
, (4.47)
cos =
e
i
+ e
i
2
. (4.48)
4.2. MATHEMATICS OF COMPLEX VARIABLES 255
4.2.3 Cauchy-Riemann equations
Now it is possible to dene complex functions of complex variables W(z). For example take
a complex function to be dened as
W(z) = z
2
+ z, (4.49)
= (x + iy)
2
+ (x + iy), (4.50)
= x
2
+ 2xyi y
2
+ x + iy, (4.51)
=
_
x
2
+ x y
2
_
+ i (2xy + y) . (4.52)
In general, we can say
W(z) = (x, y) + i(x, y). (4.53)
Here and are real functions of real variables.
Now W(z) is dened as analytic at z
o
if dW/dz exists at z
o
and is independent of the
direction in which it was calculated. That is, using the denition of the derivative
dW
dz
zo
=
W(z
o
+ z) W(z
o
)
z
. (4.54)
Now there are many paths that we can choose to evaluate the derivative. Let us consider
two distinct paths, y = C
1
and x = C
2
. We will get a result which can be shown to be valid
for arbitrary paths. For y = C
1
, we have z = x, so
dW
dz
zo
=
W(x
o
+ iy
o
+ x) W(x
o
+ iy
o
)
x
=
W
x
y
. (4.55)
For x = C
2
, we have z = iy, so
dW
dz
zo
=
W(x
o
+ iy
o
+ iy) W(x
o
+ iy
o
)
iy
=
1
i
W
y
x
= i
W
y
x
. (4.56)
Now for an analytic function, we need
W
x
y
= i
W
y
x
, (4.57)
or, expanding, we need
x
+ i
x
= i
_
y
+ i
y
_
, (4.58)
=

y
i
y
. (4.59)
For equality, and thus path independence of the derivative, we require
x
=

y
,

y
=
x
. (4.60)
These are the well known Cauchy-Riemann
3
equations for analytic functions of com-
plex variables. They are identical to our kinematic equations for incompressible irrotational
uid mechanics. Consequently, any analytic complex function is guaranteed to be a physical
solution. There are essentially an innite number of functions to choose from.
Thus we dene the complex velocity potential as
W(z) = (x, y) + i(x, y), (4.61)
and taking a derivative of the analytic potential, we have
dW
dz
=

x
+ i
x
= u iv. (4.62)
We can equivalently say
dW
dz
= i
_
y
+ i
y
_
=
_
y
i
y
_
= u iv. (4.63)
Now most common functions are easily shown to be analytic. For example for the function
W(z) = z
2
+ z, which can be expressed as W(z) = (x
2
+ x y
2
) + i(2xy + y), we have
(x, y) = x
2
+ x y
2
, (x, y) = 2xy + y, (4.64)
x
= 2x + 1,

x
= 2y, (4.65)
y
= 2y,

y
= 2x + 1. (4.66)
Note that the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satised since /x = /y and /y =
/x. So the derivative is independent of direction, and we can say
dW
dz
=
W
x
y
= (2x + 1) + i(2y) = 2(x + iy) + 1 = 2z + 1. (4.67)
We could get this result by ordinary rules of derivatives for real functions.
For example of a non-analytic function consider W(z) = z. Thus
W(z) = x iy. (4.68)
So = x and = y, /x = 1, /y = 0, and /x = 0, /y = 1. Since
/x = /y, the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satised, and the derivative depends
on direction.
3
Augustin-Louis Cauchy, 1789-1857, French mathematician and military engineer, worked in complex
analysis, optics, and theory of elasticity.
4.3. ELEMENTARY COMPLEX POTENTIALS 257
-2 -1 0 1 2
-2
-1
0
1
2
x
i y
Figure 4.2: Streamlines for uniform ow.

4.3 Elementary complex potentials
Let us examine some simple analytic functions and see the uid mechanics to which they
correspond.
4.3.1 Uniform ow
Take
W(z) = Az, with A C
1
. (4.69)
Then
dW
dz
= A = u iv. (4.70)
Since A is complex, we can say
A = U
o
e
i
= U
o
cos iU
o
sin . (4.71)
Thus we get
u = U
o
cos , v = U
o
sin . (4.72)
This represents a spatially uniform ow with streamlines inclined at angle to the x axis.
The ow is sketched in Figure 4.2.
4.3.2 Sources and sinks
Take
W(z) = Aln z, with A R
1
. (4.73)
With z = re
i
we have ln z = ln r + i. So
W(z) = Aln r + iA. (4.74)
Consequently, we have for the velocity potential and stream function
= Aln r, = A. (4.75)
Now v = , so
v
r
=

r
=
A
r
, v
=
1
r
= 0. (4.76)
So the velocity is all radial, and becomes innite at r = 0. We can show that the volume
ow rate is bounded, and is in fact a constant. The volume ow rate Q through a surface is
Q =
_
A
v
T
n dA =
_
2
0
v
r
rd =
_
2
0
A
r
rd = 2A. (4.77)
The volume ow rate is a constant. If A > 0, we have a source. If A < 0, we have a sink.
The potential for a source/sink is often written as
W(z) =
Q
2
ln z. (4.78)
For a source located at a point z
o
which is not at the origin, we can say
W(z) =
Q
2
ln(z z
o
). (4.79)
The ow is sketched in Figure 4.3.
4.3.3 Point vortices
For an ideal point vortex, identical to what we studied in an earlier chapter, we have
W(z) = iBln z, with B R
1
. (4.80)
So
W(z) = iB(ln r + i) = B + iBln r. (4.81)
Consequently,
= B, = Bln r. (4.82)
We get the velocity eld from
v
r
=

r
= 0, v
=
1
r
=
B
r
. (4.83)
x
i y

Figure 4.3: Velocity vectors and equipotential lines for source ow.
So we see that the streamlines are circles about the origin, and there is no radial component
of velocity. Consider the circulation of this ow
=
_
C
v
T
dr =
_
2
0
B
r
rd = 2B. (4.84)
So we often write the complex potential in terms of the ideal vortex strength :
W(z) =
i
2
ln z. (4.85)
For an ideal vortex not at z = z
o
, we say
W(z) =
i
2
ln(z z
o
). (4.86)
The point vortex ow is sketched in Figure 4.4.
4.3.4 Superposition of sources
Since the equation for velocity potential is linear, we can use the method of superposition
to create new solutions as summations of elementary solutions. Say we want to model the
eect of a wall on a source as sketched in Figure 4.5. At the wall we want u(0, y) = 0. That
is
_
dW
dz
_
= {u iv} = 0, on z = iy. (4.87)
Here denotes the real part of a complex function. Now let us place a source at z = a
and superpose a source at z = a, where a is a real number. So we have for the complex
x
i y
Figure 4.4: Streamlines, equipotential, and velocity vectors lines for a point vortex.
Q Q
x
i y
a a
Figure 4.5: Sketch for source-wall interaction.
potential
W(z) =
Q
2
ln(z a)
. .
original
+
Q
2
ln(z + a)
. .
image
, (4.88)
=
Q
2
(ln(z a) + ln(z + a)) , (4.89)
=
Q
2
(ln(z a)(z + a)) , (4.90)
=
Q
2
ln(z
2
a
2
), (4.91)
dW
dz
=
Q
2
2z
z
2
a
2
. (4.92)
Now on z = iy, which is the location of the wall, we have
dW
dz
=
Q
2
_
2iy
y
2
a
2
_
. (4.93)
The term is purely imaginary; hence, the real part is zero, and we have u = 0 on the wall,
as desired.
On the wall we do have a non-zero y component of velocity. Hence the wall is not a
no-slip wall. On the wall we have then
v =
Q
y
y
2
+ a
2
. (4.94)
We nd the location on the wall of the maximum v velocity by setting the derivative with
respect to y to be zero,
v
y
=
Q
(y + a)
2
y(2y)
(y
2
+ a
2
)
2
= 0. (4.95)
Solving, we nd a critical point at y = a, which can be shown to be a maximum.
So on the wall we have
1
2
(u
2
+ v
2
) =
1
2
Q
2
2
y
2
(y
2
+ a
2
)
2
. (4.96)
We can use Bernoullis equation to nd the pressure eld, assuming steady ow and that
p p
o
as r . So Bernoullis equation in this limit
1
2
()
T
+
p
=
p
o
, (4.97)
reduces to
p = p
o
1
2
Q
2
2
y
2
(y
2
+ a
2
)
2
. (4.98)
Note that the pressure is p
o
at y = 0 and is p
o
as y . By integrating the pressure over
the wall surface, one would nd that the source exerted a net force on the wall.
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4
-2
0
2
4
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4
-2
0
2
4
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4
-2
0
2
4
x x
x
iy iy
iy
Figure 4.6: Sketch for impingement ow, stagnation ow, and ow in a corner, n = 2.
4.3.5 Flow in corners
Flow in or around a corner can be modeled by the complex potential
W(z) = Az
n
, with A R
1
, (4.99)
= A
_
re
i
_
n
, (4.100)
= Ar
n
e
in
, (4.101)
= Ar
n
(cos(n) + i sin(n)). (4.102)
So we have
= Ar
n
cos n, = Ar
n
sin n. (4.103)
Now recall that lines on which is constant are streamlines. Examining the stream function,
we obviously have streamlines when = 0 which occurs whenever = 0 or = /n.
For example if n = 2, we model a stream striking a at wall. For this ow, we have
W(z) = Az
2
, (4.104)
= A(x + iy)
2
, (4.105)
= A((x
2
y
2
) + i(2xy)), (4.106)
= A(x
2
y
2
), = A(2xy). (4.107)
So the streamlines are hyperbolas. For the velocity eld, we take
dW
dz
= 2Az = 2A(x + iy) = u iv, (4.108)
u = 2Ax, v = 2Ay. (4.109)
This ow actually represents ow in a corner formed by a right angle or ow striking a at
plate, or the impingement of two streams. For n = 2, streamlines are sketched in in Figure
4.6.
Q
x
i y

- Q
sink
source
Figure 4.7: Source sink pair.
4.3.6 Doublets
We can form what is known as a doublet ow by considering the superposition of a source
and sink and let the two approach each other. Consider a source and sink of equal and
opposite strength straddling the y axis, each separated from the origin by a distance as
sketched in Figure 4.7. The complex velocity potential is
W(z) =
Q
2
ln(z + )
Q
2
ln(z ), (4.110)
=
Q
2
ln
_
z +
z
_
. (4.111)
It can be shown by synthetic division that as 0, that
z +
z
= 1 +
2
z
+
2
2
z
2
+ . . . . (4.112)
So the potential approaches
W(z)
Q
2
ln
_
1 +
2
z
+
2
2
z
2
+ . . .
_
. (4.113)
Now since ln(1 + x) x as x 0, we get for small that
W(z)
Q
2
2
z

Q
z
. (4.114)
Now if we require that
lim
0
Q
, (4.115)
we have
W(z) =

z
=

x + iy
x iy
x iy
=
(x iy)
x
2
+ y
2
. (4.116)
So
(x, y) =
x
x
2
+ y
2
, (x, y) =
y
x
2
+ y
2
. (4.117)
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4
-2
0
2
4
= a
= b
= c
= a
= b
x
i y
Figure 4.8: Streamlines and equipotential lines for a doublet.
In polar coordinates, we then say
=
cos
r
, =
sin
r
. (4.118)
Streamlines and equipotential lines for a doublet are plotted in Figure 4.8.
4.3.7 Rankine half body
Now consider the superposition of a uniform stream and a source, which we dene to be a
Rankine half body:
W(z) = Uz +
Q
2
lnz, with U, Q R
1
, (4.119)
= Ure
i
+
Q
2
(ln r + i), (4.120)
= Ur(cos + i sin ) +
Q
2
(lnr + i), (4.121)
=
_
Ur cos +
Q
2
ln r
_
+ i
_
Ur sin +
Q
2
_
. (4.122)
So
= Ur cos +
Q
2
ln r, = Ur sin +
Q
2
. (4.123)
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4
-2
0
2
4
x
i y
Figure 4.9: Streamlines for a Rankine half body.
Streamlines for a Rankine half body are plotted in Figure 4.9. Now for the Rankine half
body, it is clear that there is a stagnation point somewhere on the x axis, along = . With
the velocity given by
dW
dz
= U +
Q
2z
= u iv, (4.124)
we get
U +
Q
2
1
r
e
i
= u iv, (4.125)
U +
Q
2
1
r
(cos i sin ) = u iv, (4.126)
u = U +
Q
2r
cos , v =
Q
2r
sin . (4.127)
When = , we get u = 0 when;
0 = U +
Q
2r
(1), (4.128)
r =
Q
2U
. (4.129)
4.3.8 Flow over a cylinder
We can model ow past a cylinder without circulation by superposing a uniform ow with
a doublet. Dening a
2
= /U, we write
W(z) = Uz +

z
= U
_
z +
a
2
z
_
, (4.130)
-2 -1 0 1 2
-2
-1
0
1
2
x
i y
Figure 4.10: Streamlines and equipotential lines for ow over a cylinder without circulation.
= U
_
re
i
+
a
2
re
i
_
, (4.131)
= U
_
r(cos + i sin ) +
a
2
r
(cos i sin )
_
, (4.132)
= U
__
r cos +
a
2
r
cos
_
+ i
_
r sin
a
2
r
sin
__
, (4.133)
= Ur
_
cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_
+ i sin
_
1
a
2
r
2
__
. (4.134)
So
= Ur cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_
, = Ur sin
_
1
a
2
r
2
_
. (4.135)
Now on r = a, we have = 0. Since the stream function is constant here, the curve r = a,
a circle, must be a streamline through which no mass can pass.
A sketch of the streamlines and equipotential lines is plotted in Figure 4.10.
For the velocities, we have
v
r
=

r
= U cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_
+ Ur cos
_
2
a
2
r
3
_
, (4.136)
= U cos
_
1
a
2
r
2
_
, (4.137)
v
=
1
r
= U sin
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_
. (4.138)
So on r = a, we have v
r
= 0, and v
= 2U sin . Thus on the surface, we have

()
T
= 4U
2
sin
2
. (4.139)
Bernoullis equation for a steady ow with p p
as r then gives
p
+
1
2
()
T
=
p
+
U
2
2
, (4.140)
p = p
+
1
2
U
2
(1 4 sin
2
). (4.141)
The pressure coecient C
p
, dened below, then is
C
p

p p
1
2
U
2
= 1 4 sin
2
. (4.142)
A sketch of the pressure distribution, both predicted and experimentally observed, is
plotted in Figure 4.11. We note that the potential theory predicts the pressure well on
the front surface of the cylinder, but not so well on the back surface. This is because
in most real uids, a phenomenon known as ow separation manifests itself in regions of
negative pressure gradients. Correct modeling of separation events requires a re-introduction
of viscous stresses. A potential theory cannot predict separation.
Example 4.1
For a cylinder of radius c at rest in an accelerating potential ow eld with a far eld velocity of
U = a + bt, nd the pressure on the stagnation point of the cylinder.
The velocity potential and velocities for this ow are
(r, , t) = (a + bt)r cos
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
, (4.143)
v
r
=

r
= (a + bt) cos
_
1
c
2
r
2
_
, (4.144)
v
=
1
r
= (a + bt) sin
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
, (4.145)
1
2
()
T
=
1
2
(a + bt)
2
_
cos
2
_
1
c
2
r
2
_
2
+ sin
2
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
2
_
, (4.146)
=
1
2
(a + bt)
2
_
1 +
c
4
r
4
+
2c
2
r
2
_
sin
2
cos
2
_
_
. (4.147)
C
p
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-3
-2
-1
1
experiment
potential
theory
pressure
distribution
on cylinder
surface from
potential theory
Figure 4.11: Pressure distribution for ideal ow over a cylinder without circulation.
Also, since the ow is unsteady, we will need /t:
t
= br cos
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
. (4.148)
Now we note in the limit as r that
t
br cos ,
1
2
()
T

1
2
(a + bt)
2
. (4.149)
We also note that on the surface of the cylinder
v
r
(r = c, , t) = 0. (4.150)
Bernoullis equation gives us
t
+
1
2
()
T
+
p
= f(t). (4.151)
We use the far eld behavior to evaluate f(t):
br cos +
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+
p
= f(t). (4.152)
Now if we make the non-intuitive choice of f(t) =
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+
po
, we get
br cos +
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+
p
=
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+
p
o
. (4.153)
4.4. MORE COMPLEX VARIABLE THEORY 269
So
p = p
o
br cos = p
o
bx. (4.154)
Note that since the ow at innity is accelerating, there must be a far-eld pressure gradient to induce
this acceleration. Consider the x momentum equation in the far eld
du
dt
=
p
x
, (4.155)
(b) = (b). (4.156)
So for the pressure eld, we have
br cos
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
+
1
2
(a + bt)
2
_
1 +
c
4
r
4
+
2c
2
r
2
(sin
2
cos
2
)
_
+
p
=
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+
p
o
, (4.157)
which reduces to
p(r, , t) = p
o
br cos
_
1 +
c
2
r
2
_
1
2
(a + bt)
2
_
c
4
r
4
+
2c
2
r
2
(sin
2
cos
2
)
_
. (4.158)
For the stagnation point, we evaluate as
p(c, , t) = p
o
bc(1) (1 + 1)
1
2
(a + bt)
2
(1 + 2(1)(0 1)) , (4.159)
= p
o
+
1
2
(a + bt)
2
+ 2bc. (4.160)
The rst two terms would be predicted by a naive extension of the steady Bernoullis equation. The
nal term however is not intuitive and is a purely unsteady eect.
4.4 More complex variable theory
There are more basic ways to describe the force on bodies using complex variables directly.
We shall give those methods, but rst a discussion of the motivating complex variable theory
is necessary.
4.4.1 Contour integrals
Consider the closed contour integral of a complex function in the complex plane. For such in-
tegrals, we have a useful theory which we will not prove, but will demonstrate here. Consider
contour integrals enclosing the origin with a circle in the complex plane for four functions.
The contour in each is C : z =

Re
i
with 0 2. For such a contour dz = i
Re
i
d.
4.4.1.1 Simple pole
We describe a simple pole with the complex potential
W(z) =
a
z
. (4.161)
and the contour integral is
_
C
W(z)dz =
_
C
a
z
dz =
_
=2
=0
a
Re
i
i
Re
i
d, (4.162)
= ai
_
2
0
d = 2ia. (4.163)
4.4.1.2 Constant potential
We describe a constant with the complex potential
W(z) = b. (4.164)
_
C
W(z)dz =
_
C
bdz =
_
=2
=0
bi
Re
i
d, (4.165)
=
bi
R
i
e
i
2
0
= 0. (4.166)
since e
0i
= e
2i
= 1.
4.4.1.3 Uniform ow
We describe a constant with the complex potential
W(z) = cz. (4.167)
_
C
W(z)dz =
_
C
czdz =
_
=2
=0
c
Re
i
i
Re
i
d, (4.168)
= ic

R
2
_
2
0
e
2
d =
ic

R
2
2i
e
2i
2
0
= 0. (4.169)
since e
0i
= e
4i
= 1.
4.4. MORE COMPLEX VARIABLE THEORY 271
4.4.1.4 Quadrapole
A quadrapole potential is described by
W(z) =
k
z
2
(4.170)
Taking the contour integral, we nd
_
C
k
z
2
dz = k
_
2
0
i
Re
i
R
2
e
2i
d, (4.171)
=
ki
R
_
2
0
e
i
d =
ki
R
1
i
e
i
2
0
= 0. (4.172)
So the only non-zero contour integral is for functions of the form W(z) = a/z. We nd all
polynomial powers of z have a zero contour integral about the origin for arbitrary contours
except this special one.
4.4.2 Laurent series
Now it can be shown that any function can be expanded, much as for a Taylor series, as a
Laurent series:
4
W(z) = . . . +C
2
(z z
o
)
2
+C
1
(z z
o
)
1
+C
0
(z z
o
)
0
+C
1
(z z
o
)
1
+C
2
(z z
o
)
2
+. . . .
(4.173)
In compact summation notation, we can say
W(z) =
n=
n=
C
n
(z z
o
)
n
. (4.174)
Taking the contour integral of both sides we get
_
C
W(z)dz =
_
C
n=
n=
C
n
(z z
o
)
n
dz, (4.175)
=
n=
n=
C
n
_
C
(z z
o
)
n
dz, (4.176)
this has value 2i only when n = 1, so (4.177)
= C
1
2i (4.178)
4
Pierre Alphonse Laurent, 1813-1854, Parisian engineer who worked on port expansion in Le Harve,
submitted his work on Laurent series for a Grand Prize in 1842, with the recommendation of Cauchy, but
was rejected because of a late submission.
Here C
1
is known as the residue of the Laurent series. In general we have the Cauchy
integral theorem which holds that if W(z) is analytic within and on a closed curve C except
for a nite number of singular points, then
_
C
W(z)dz = 2i
residues. (4.179)
The constants C
n
can be shown to be found by evaluating the contour integral
C
n
=
1
2i
_
C
W(z)
(z z
o
)
n+1
dz, (4.180)
where C is any closed contour which has z
o
in its interior.
4.5 Pressure distribution for steady ow
For steady, irrotational, incompressible ow with no body force present, we have the Bernoulli
equation:
p
+
1
2
()
T
=
p
+
1
2
U
2
. (4.181)
We can write this in terms of the complex potential in a simple fashion. First, recall that
()
T
= u
2
+ v
2
. (4.182)
We also have dW/dz = u iv, so dW/dz = u + iv. Consequently,
dW
dz
dW
dz
= u
2
+ v
2
= ()
T
. (4.183)
So we get the pressure eld from Bernoullis equation to be
p = p
+
1
2
_
U
2
dW
dz
dW
dz
_
. (4.184)
The pressure coecient C
p
is
C
p
=
p p
1
2
U
2
= 1
1
U
2
dW
dz
dW
dz
. (4.185)
4.6 Blasius force theorem
For steady ows, we can nd the net contribution of a pressure force on an arbitrary shaped
solid body with the Blasius
5
force theorem.
4.6. BLASIUS FORCE THEOREM 273
x
i y
n
n
C
S
b
Figure 4.12: Potential ow about arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional body with uid control
volume indicated.
Consider the geometry sketched in Figure 4.12. The surface of the arbitrarily shaped
body is described by S
b
, and C is a closed contour containing S
b
. First consider the linear
momenta equation for steady ow, no body forces, and no viscous forces,
_
v
T

_
v = p, add mass to get conservative form, (4.186)
_
T
(vv
T
)
_
T
= p, integrate over V , (4.187)
_
V
_
T
(vv
T
)
_
T
dV =
_
V
p dV, use Gauss, (4.188)
_
S
v(v
T
n)dS =
_
S
pndS. (4.189)
Now the surface integral here is really a line integral with unit depth b, dS = bds. Moreover
the surface enclosing the uid has an inner contour S
b
and an outer contour C. Now on C,
which we prescribe, we will know x(s) and y(s), where s is arc length. So on C we also get
the unit tangent and unit outward normal n:
=
_
dx
ds
dy
ds
_
, n =
_
dy
ds
dx
ds
_
, on C. (4.190)
Moreover, on S
b
we have, since it is a solid surface
v
T
n = 0, on C. (4.191)
5
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius, 1883-1970, student of Ludwig Prandtl and long time teacher at the tech-
nical college of Hamburg whose 1907 Ph.D. thesis gave mathematical description of similarity solution to
the boundary layer problem.
Now let the force on the body due to uid pressure be F:
_
S
b
pndS = F. (4.192)
Now return to our linear momentum equation
_
S
vv
T
ndS =
_
S
pndS, break this up, (4.193)
_
S
b
v v
T
n
. .
=0
dS +
_
C
vv
T
ndS =
_
S
b
pndS
. .
= F
_
C
pndS, (4.194)
_
C
vv
T
ndS = F
_
C
pndS. (4.195)
We can break this into x and y components:
_
C
u
_
u
dy
ds
v
dx
ds
_
. .
v
T
n
bds =
_
C
p
dy
ds
bds F
x
, (4.196)
_
C
v
_
u
dy
ds
v
dx
ds
_
. .
v
T
n
bds =
_
C
p
dx
ds
bds F
y
, (4.197)
solving for F
x
and F
y
per unit depth, (4.198)
F
x
b
=
_
C
pdy u
2
dy + uvdx, (4.199)
F
y
b
=
_
C
pdx + v
2
dx uvdy. (4.200)
Now Bernoulli gives us p = K (1/2)(u
2
+ v
2
), where K is some constant. So the x force
per unit depth becomes
F
x
b
=
_
C
Kdy +
1
2
(u
2
+ v
2
)dy u
2
dy + uvdx, (4.201)
since the integral over a closed contour of a constant K is zero, (4.202)
=
_
C
1
2
(u
2
+ v
2
)dy + uvdx, (4.203)
=
1
2
_
C
(u
2
+ v
2
)dy + 2uvdx. (4.204)
Similarly for the y direction, we get
F
y
b
=
_
C
Kdx
1
2
(u
2
+ v
2
)dy + v
2
dx uvdy, (4.205)
=
1
2
_
C
(u
2
+ v
2
)dx 2uvdx. (4.206)
4.7. KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY LIFT THEOREM 275
x
i y
C
Q
U
o
Figure 4.13: Potential ow about arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional body with distribution
of sources, sinks, vortices, and dipoles.
Now consider the group of terms
FxiFy
b
:
F
x
iF
y
b
=
1
2
_
C
(u
2
+ v
2
)dy + 2uvdx (u
2
+ v
2
)idx + 2uvidy, (4.207)
=
1
2
_
C
(i(u
2
v
2
) + 2uv)dx + ((u
2
+ v
2
) + 2uvi)dy, (4.208)
=
1
2
_
C
(i(u
2
v
2
) + 2uv)dx + (i(u
2
v
2
) + 2uv)idy, (4.209)
=
1
2
_
C
(i(u
2
v
2
) + 2uv)(dx + idy), (4.210)
=
1
2
_
C
i(u iv)
2
(dx + idy), (4.211)
=
1
2
i
_
C
_
dW
dz
_
2
dz. (4.212)
So if we have the complex potential, we can easily get the force on a body.
4.7 Kutta-Zhukovsky lift theorem
Consider the geometry sketched in Figure 4.13. Here we consider a ow with a freestream
constant velocity of U
o
. We take an arbitrary body shape to enclose a distribution of canceling
source sink pairs, doublets, point vortices, quadrapoles, and any other non-mass adding
potential ow term. This combination gives rise to some surface which is a streamline.
Now far from the body surface a contour sees all of these features as eectively concen-
trated at the origin. Then, the potential can be written as
W(z) Uz
..
uniform ow
+
Q
2
ln z
Q
2
ln z
. .
canceling source sink pair
+
i
2
lnz
. .
clockwise! vortex
+

z
..
doublet
+. . . (4.213)
Note that the sign convention for has been violated here, by tradition. Now let us take
D to be the so-called drag force per unit depth and L to be the so-called lift force per unit
depth, so in terms of F
x
and F
y
, we have
F
x
b
= D,
F
y
b
= L. (4.214)
Now by the Blasius force theorem, we have
D iL =
1
2
i
_
C
_
dW
dz
_
2
dz, (4.215)
=
1
2
i
_
C
_
U +
i
2z

z
2
+ . . .
_
2
dz, (4.216)
=
1
2
i
_
C
_
U
2
+
iU
z

1
z
2
_

2
4
2
+ 2U
_
+ . . .
_
dz. (4.217)
Now the Cauchy integral theorem gives is the contour integral is 2i
residues. Here the

residue is iU/. So we get
D iL =
1
2
i
_
2i
_
iU
__
, (4.218)
= iU. (4.219)
So we see that
D = 0, (4.220)
L = U. (4.221)
Note that
is associated with clockwise circulation here. This is something of a tradition in
aerodynamics.
Since for airfoils U, we get the lift force L U
2
,
For steady inviscid ow, there is no drag. Consideration of either unsteady or viscous
eects would lead to a non-zero x component of force.
4.7. KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY LIFT THEOREM 277
Example 4.2
Consider the ow over a cylinder of radius a with clockwise circulation . To do so, we can
superpose a point vortex onto the potential for ow over a cylinder in the following fashion:
W(z) = U
_
z +
a
2
z
_
+
i
2
ln
_
z
a
_
. (4.222)
Breaking this up as before into real and complex parts, we get
W(z) =
_
Ur cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
__
+ i
_
Ur sin
_
1
a
2
r
2
__
+
i
2
_
ln
_
r
a
_
+ i
_
. (4.223)
So, we nd
= (W(z)) = Ur sin
_
1
a
2
r
2
_
+

2
ln
_
r
a
_
. (4.224)
On r = a, we nd that = 0, so the addition of the circulation in the way we have proposed maintains
the cylinder surface to be a streamline. It is important to note that this is valid for arbitrary . That
is the potential ow solution for ow over a cylinder is non-unique. In aerodynamics, this is used to
advantage to add just enough circulation to enforce the so-called Kutta condition.
6
The Kutta condition
is an experimentally observed fact that for a steady ow, the trailing edge of an airfoil is a stagnation
point.
The Kutta-Zhukovsky
7
lift theorem tells us whenever we add circulation, that a lift force L = U
is induced. This is consistent with the phenomena observed in baseball that the fastball rises. The
fastball leaves the pitchers hand traveling towards the batter and rotating towards the pitcher. The
induced aerodynamic force is opposite to the force of gravity.
Let us get the lift force the hard way and verify the Kutta-Zhukovsky theorem. We can easily get
the velocity eld from the velocity potential:
= (W(z)) = Ur cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_

2
, (4.225)
v
r
=

r
= Ur cos
_
2a
2
r
3
_
+ U cos
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_
, (4.226)
v
r
|
r=a
= U cos
_
2a
3
a
3
+ 1 +
a
2
a
2
_
= 0, (4.227)
v
=
1
r
=
1
r
_
Ur sin
_
1 +
a
2
r
2
_

2
_
, (4.228)
v
|
r=a
= U sin
_
1 +
a
2
a
2
_

2a
, (4.229)
= 2U sin

2a
. (4.230)
We get the pressure on the cylinder surface from Bernoullis equation:
p = p
+
1
2
U
2
1
2
()
T
, (4.231)
6
Martin Wilhelm Kutta, 1867-1944, Silesian-born German mechanician, studied at Breslau, taught
mainly at Stuttgart, co-developer of Runge-Kutta method for integrating ordinary dierential equations.
7
Nikolai Egorovich Zhukovsky, 1847-1921, Russian applied mathematician and mechanician, father of
Russian aviation, purchased glider from Lilienthal, developed lift theorem independently of Kutta, organized
Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute in 1918.
x
i y
l
o
c
a
l
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

f
o
r
c
e
Figure 4.14: Pressure force on a dierential area element of cylindrical surface.
= p
+
1
2
U
2
1
2
_
2U sin

2a
_
2
. (4.232)
Now for a small element of the cylinder at r = a, the surface area is dA = brd = bad. This is sketched
in Figure 4.14. We also note that the x and y forces depend on the orientation of the element, given
by . Elementary trigonometry shows that the elemental x and y forces per depth are
dF
x
b
= p cos ad, (4.233)
dF
y
b
= p sinad. (4.234)
So integrating over the entire cylinder, we obtain,
F
x
b
=
_
2
0
_
p
+
1
2
U
2
1
2
_
2U sin

2a
_
2
_
cos ad, (4.235)
F
y
b
=
_
2
0
_
p
+
1
2
U
2
1
2
_
2U sin

2a
_
2
_
sin ad. (4.236)
Integration via computer algebra gives
F
x
b
= 0, (4.237)
F
y
b
= U. (4.238)
This is identical to the result we expect from the Kutta-Zhukovsky lift theorem.
4.8. CONFORMAL MAPPING 279
4.8 Conformal mapping
Conformal mapping is a technique by which we can render results obtained for simple ows,
such as those over a cylinder, applicable to ows over more complicated geometries. We
will not consider these in any detail here, but the reader should refer to texts on potential
ow for a full explanation. In short, one relies on a coordinate transformation to map the
complicated geometry in an ordinary space into a simple geometry in a warped geometric
space. In the warped space, on can obtain pressure elds in terms of the warped coordinates,
then transform them back into ordinary space to get the actual pressure eld.
Chapter 5
Viscous incompressible laminar ow
see Panton, Chapter 7, 11
see Yih, Chapter 7
Here we consider a few standard problems in viscous incompressible laminar ow. For this
entire chapter, we will make the following assumptions:
the ow is incompressible,
body forces are negligible, and
the uid properties, c, and k, are constants.
5.1 Fully developed, one dimensional solutions
The rst type of solution we will consider is known as a one-dimensional fully developed
solution. These are commonly considered in rst courses in uid mechanics and heat transfer.
The ows here are essentially one-dimensional, but not absolutely, as they were in the chapter
on one-dimensional compressible ow. In this section, we will further enforce that
the ow is time-independent,
o
= 0,
the velocity and temperature gradients in the x and z direction are zero, v/x = 0,
v/z = 0, T/x = 0, T/z = 0.
We will see that these assumptions give rise to ows with a non-zero x velocity u which
varies in the y direction, and that other velocities v, and w, will be zero.
5.1.1 Pressure gradient driven ow in a slot
Consider the ow sketched in Figure 5.1. Here we have a large reservoir of uid with a
long narrow slot located around y = 0. We take the length of the slot in the z direction,
281
282 CHAPTER 5. VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE LAMINAR FLOW
= constant
= constant
L
b
p
1
p
o
x
y
z
Figure 5.1: Pressure gradient driven ow in a slot.
b, to be long relative to the slot width in the y direction h. Attached to the slot are two
parallel plates, separated by distance in the y direction h. The length of the plates in the x
direction is L. We take L >> h. Because of gravity forces, which we neglect in the slot, the
pressure at the entrance of the slot p
o
is higher than atmospheric. At the end of the slot,
the uid expels to the atmosphere which is at p
1
. Hence, there is a pressure gradient in the
x direction, which drives the ow in the slot. We will see that the ow is resisted by viscous
stresses. An analogous ow in a circular duct is dened as a Hagen-Poiseuille
12
ow.
Near x = 0, the ow accelerates in what is known as the entrance length. If L is suciently
long, we observe that the uid particles no longer accelerate after traveling in the slot. It is
at this point where the viscous shear forces exactly balance the pressure forces to give rise
to the fully developed velocity eld.
For this ow, let us make the additional assumptions that
there is no imposed pressure gradient in the z direction, and
the walls are held at a constant temperature, T
o
.
Incorporating some of these assumptions, we write the incompressible constant property
Navier-Stokes equations as
i
v
i
= 0, (5.1)
o
v
i
+ v
j
j
v
i
=
i
p +
j
j
v
i
, (5.2)
c
o
T + cv
j
j
T = k
i
i
T + 2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
. (5.3)
1
Gotthilf Ludwig Hagen, 1797-1884, German engineer who measured velocity of water in small diameter
tubes.
2
Jean Louis Poiseuille, 1799-1869, French physician who repeated experiments of Hagen for simulated
blood ow.
5.1. FULLY DEVELOPED, ONE DIMENSIONAL SOLUTIONS 283
Here we have ve equations in ve unknowns, v
i
, p, and T.
As for all incompressible ows with constant properties, we can get the velocity eld by
only considering the mass and momenta equations; velocity is only coupled one way to the
energy equation.
The mass equation, recalling that gradients in x and z are zero, gives us
x
..
=0
u +

y
v +

z
..
=0
w = 0. (5.4)
So the mass equation gives us
v
y
= 0. (5.5)
Now, from our assumptions of steady and fully developed ow, we know that v cannot be a
function of x, z, or t. So the partial becomes a total derivative, and mass conservation holds
that dv/dy = 0. Integrating, we nd that v(y) = C. The constant C must be zero, since we
must satisfy a no-slip boundary condition at either wall that v(y = h/2) = v(y = h/2) = 0.
Hence, mass conservation, coupled with the no slip boundary condition gives us
v = 0. (5.6)
Now consider the x momentum equation:

t
..
=0
u + u

x
..
=0
u + v
..
=0
y
u + w

z
..
=0
u =
p
x
+
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
u +

2
y
2
u +

2
z
2
..
=0
u
_
_
_
,
(5.7)
0 =
p
x
+
2
u
y
2
. (5.8)
We note for this fully developed ow that the acceleration, that is the material derivative
of velocity, is formally zero, and the equation gives rise to a balance of pressure and viscous
surface forces.
For the y momentum equation, we get

t
..
=0
v
..
=0
+u

x
..
=0
v
..
=0
+ v
..
=0
y
v
..
=0
+w

z
..
=0
v
..
=0
=
p
y
(5.9)
+
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
v +

2
y
2
v
..
=0
+

2
z
2
..
=0
v
_
_
_
,
0 =
p
y
. (5.10)
Hence, p = p(x, z), but since we have assumed there is no pressure gradient in the z direction,
we have at most that
p = p(x). (5.11)
For the z momentum equation we get:

t
..
=0
w + u

x
..
=0
w + v
..
=0
y
w + w

z
..
=0
w =
p
z
..
=0
(5.12)
+
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
w +

2
y
2
w +

2
z
2
..
=0
w
_
_
_
,
0 =

2
w
y
2
. (5.13)
Solution of this partial dierential equation gives us
w = f(x, z)y + g(x, z). (5.14)
Now to satisfy no-slip, we must have w = 0 at y = h/2. This leads us to two linear
equations for f and g:
_
h
2
1
h
2
1
__
f(x, z)
g(x, z)
_
=
_
0
0
_
. (5.15)
Since the determinant of the coecient matrix, h/2+h/2 = h, is non-zero, the only solution
is the trivial solution f(x, z) = g(x, z) = 0. Hence,
w = 0. (5.16)
Next consider how the energy equation reduces:
c

t
..
=0
T + c
_
_
_
u

x
..
=0
T + v
..
=0
y
T + w
..
=0
z
..
=0
T
_
_
_
= k
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
T +

2
y
2
T +

2
z
2
..
=0
T
_
_
_
+2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
, (5.17)
0 = k
2
T
y
2
+ 2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
. (5.18)
Note that there is no tendency for a particles temperature to increase. There is a balance
between thermal energy generated by viscous dissipation and that conducted away by ther-
mal diusion. Thus the energy path is 1) viscous work is done to generate thermal energy,
2) thermal energy diuses throughout the channel and out the boundary. Now consider the
viscous dissipation term for this ow.
i
v
j
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
..
=0
v
1

1
..
=0
v
2
..
=0
1
..
=0
v
3
..
=0
2
v
1

2
v
2
..
=0
2
v
3
..
=0
3
..
=0
v
1

3
..
=0
v
2
..
=0
3
..
=0
v
3
..
=0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
0 0 0
2
v
1
0 0
0 0 0
_
_
, (5.19)
(i
v
j)
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
1
2
_
_
2
v
1
+
1
v
2
..
=0
_
_
0
1
2
_
_
2
v
1
+
1
v
2
..
=0
_
_
0 0
0 0 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
=
_
_
0
1
2
u
y
0
1
2
u
y
0 0
0 0 0
_
_
. (5.20)
Further,
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
=
_
1
2
u
y
_
2
+
_
1
2
u
y
_
2
=
1
2
_
u
y
_
2
. (5.21)
So the energy equation becomes nally
0 = k
2
T
y
2
+
_
u
y
_
2
. (5.22)
At this point we have the x momentum and energy equations as the only two which seem
to have any substance.
0 =
p
x
+
2
u
y
2
, (5.23)
0 = k
2
T
y
2
+
_
u
y
_
2
. (5.24)
This looks like two equations in three unknowns. One peculiarity of incompressible equations
is that there is always some side condition, which ultimately hinges on the mass equation,
which really gives a third equation. Without going into details, it involves for general ows
solving a Poisson
3
equation for pressure which is of the form
2
p = f(u, v). Note that this
involves second derivatives of pressure. Here we can obtain a simple form of this general
equation by taking the partial derivative with respect to x of the x momentum equation:
0 =
2
p
x
2
+

x
2
u
y
2
, (5.25)
0 =
2
p
x
2
+

2
y
2
u
x
..
=0
. (5.26)
3
Simeon Denis Poisson, 1781-1840, French mathematician taught by Laplace, Lagrange, and Legendre,
studied partial dierential equations, potential theory, elasticity, and electrodynamics.
The viscous term above is zero because of our assumption of fully developed ow. Moreover,
since p = p(x) only, we then get
d
2
p
dx
2
= 0, p(0) = p
o
, p(L) = p
1
, (5.27)
which has a solution showing the pressure eld must be linear in x:
p(x) = p
o
p
o
p
1
L
x, (5.28)
dp
dx
=
p
o
p
1
L
. (5.29)
Now, since u is at most a function of y, we can convert partial derivatives to ordinary deriva-
tives, and write the x momentum equation and energy equation as two ordinary dierential
equations in two unknowns with appropriate boundary conditions at the wall y = h/2:
d
2
u
dy
2
=
p
o
p
1
L
, u
_
h
2
_
= 0, u
_
h
2
_
= 0, (5.30)
d
2
T
dy
2
=
k
_
du
dy
_
2
, T
_
h
2
_
= T
o
, T
_
h
2
_
= T
o
. (5.31)
We could solve these equations directly, but instead let us rst cast them in dimensionless
form. This will give our results some universality and eciency. Moreover, it will reveal more
fundamental groups of terms which govern the uid behavior. Let us select scales such that
dimensionless variables, denoted by a * subscript, are as follows
y
=
y
h
, T
=
T T
o
T
o
, u
=
u
u
c
. (5.32)
We have yet to determine the characteristic velocity u
c
. Note that the dimensionless tem-
perature has been chosen to render it zero at the boundaries. With these choices, the x
momentum equation becomes
u
c
h
2
d
2
u
dy
2
=
p
o
p
1
L
, (5.33)
d
2
u
dy
2
=
(p
o
p
1
)h
2
Lu
c
, (5.34)
u
c
u
(x
h = h/2) = u
c
u
(x
h = h/2) = 0, (5.35)
u
(x
= 1/2) = u
(x
= 1/2) = 0. (5.36)
Let us now choose the characteristic velocity to render the x momentum equation to have a
simple form:
u
c
(p
o
p
1
)h
2
L
. (5.37)
Now scale the energy equation:
T
o
h
2
d
2
T
dy
2
=
u
2
c
kh
2
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.38)
d
2
T
dy
2
=
u
2
c
kT
o
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.39)
=
c
k
u
2
c
cT
o
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.40)
= PrEc
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.41)
T
1
2
_
= T
_
1
2
_
= 0. (5.42)
Here we have grouped terms so that the Prandtl number Pr = c/k, explicitly appears.
Further, we have dened the Eckert
4
number Ec as
Ec =
u
2
c
cT
o
=
_
(pop
1
)h
2
L
_
2
cT
o
. (5.43)
In summary our dimensionless dierential equations and boundary conditions are
d
2
u
dy
2
= 1, u
_
1
2
_
= 0, (5.44)
d
2
T
dy
2
= PrEc
_
du
dy
_
2
, T
1
2
_
= 0. (5.45)
These boundary conditions are homogeneous; hence, they do not contribute to a non-trivial
solution. The pressure gradient is an inhomogeneous forcing term in the momentum equa-
tion, and the viscous dissipation is a forcing term in the energy equation.
The solution for the velocity eld which satises the dierential equation and boundary
conditions is quadratic in y
and is
u
=
1
2
_
_
1
2
_
2
y
2
_
. (5.46)
Note that the maximum velocity occurs at y
= 0 and has value

u
max
=
1
8
. (5.47)
4
Ernst R. G. Eckert, 1904-2004, scholar of convective heat transfer.
u
*
y = 1/2
*
y = -1/2
*
Figure 5.2: Velocity prole for pressure gradient driven ow in a slot.
The mean velocity is found through integrating the velocity eld to arrive at
u
mean
=
_
1/2
1/2
u
(y
)dy
, (5.48)
=
_
1/2
1/2
1
2
_
_
1
2
_
2
y
2
_
dy
, (5.49)
=
1
2
_
1
4
y
1
3
y
3
1/2
1/2
, (5.50)
=
1
12
. (5.51)
Note that we could have scaled the velocity eld in such a fashion that either the maximum
or the mean velocity was unity. The scaling we chose gave rise to a non-unity value of both.
In dimensional terms we could say
u
(pop
1
)h
2
L
=
1
2
_
_
1
2
_
2
_
y
h
_
2
_
. (5.52)
The velocity prole is sketched in Figure 5.2.
Now let us get the temperature eld.
d
2
T
dy
2
= PrEc
_
d
dy
_
1
2
_
_
1
2
_
2
y
2
___
2
, (5.53)
= PrEc (y
)
2
, (5.54)
= PrEc y
2
, (5.55)
dT
dy
=
1
3
PrEc y
3
+ C
1
, (5.56)
T
y
1/2
-1/2
*
*
Figure 5.3: Temperature prole for pressure gradient driven ow in a slot.
T
=
1
12
PrEc y
4
+ C
1
y
+ C
2
, (5.57)
0 =
1
12
PrEc
1
16
+ C
1
1
2
+ C
2
, y
=
1
2
, (5.58)
0 =
1
12
PrEc
1
16
C
1
1
2
+ C
2
, y
=
1
2
, (5.59)
C
1
= 0, C
2
=
PrEc
192
. (5.60)
Regrouping, we nd that
T
=
PrEc
12
_
_
1
2
_
4
y
4
_
. (5.61)
In terms of dimensional quantities, we can say
T T
o
T
o
=
(p
o
p
1
)
2
h
4
12L
2
kT
o
_
_
1
2
_
4
_
y
h
_
4
_
. (5.62)
The temperature prole is sketched in Figure 5.3.
From knowledge of the velocity and temperature eld, we can calculate other quantities
of interest. Let us calculate the eld of shear stress and heat ux, and then evaluate both
at the wall.
First for the shear stress, recall that in dimensional form we have
ij
= 2
(i
v
j)
+
k
v
k
..
=0
ij
, (5.63)
= 2
(i
v
j)
. (5.64)
We have already seen the only non-zero components of the symmetric part of the velocity
gradient tensor are the 12 and 21 components. Thus the 21 stress component is
21
= 2
(2
v
1)
= 2
_
_
_
2
v
1
+
1
v
2
..
=0
2
_
_
_
, (5.65)
=
2
v
1
. (5.66)
In (x, y) space, we then say here that
yx
=
du
dy
. (5.67)
Note this is a stress on the y (tangential) face which points in the x direction; hence, it
is certainly a shearing stress. In dimensionless terms, we can dene a characteristic shear
stress
c
, so that the scale shear is
=
yx
/
c
. Thus, our equation for shear becomes
=
u
c
h
du
dy
. (5.68)
Now take
c

u
c
h
=
(p
o
p
1
)h
2
hL
= (p
o
p
1
)
_
h
L
_
. (5.69)
With this denition, we get
=
du
dy
. (5.70)
Evaluating for the velocity prole of the pressure gradient driven ow, we nd
= y
. (5.71)
The stress is zero at the centerline y
= 0 and has maximum magnitude of 1/2 at either

wall, y
= 1/2. In dimensional terms, the wall shear stress

w
is
w
=
1
2
(p
o
p
1
)
_
h
L
_
. (5.72)
Note that the wall shear stress is governed by the pressure dierence and not the viscosity.
However, the viscosity plays a determining role in selecting the maximum uid velocity. The
shear prole is sketched in Figure 5.4.
Next, let us calculate the heat ux vector. Recall that, for this ow, with no x or z
variation of T, we have the heat ux vector as
q
y
= k
T
y
. (5.73)
*
y
= 1/2
y
= -1/2
*
Figure 5.4: Shear stress prole for pressure gradient driven ow in a slot.
Now dene scale the heat ux by a characteristic heat ux q
c
, to be determined, to obtain
a dimensionless heat ux:
q
=
q
y
q
c
. (5.74)
So,
q
c
q
=
kT
o
h
dT
dy
, (5.75)
q
=
kT
o
hq
c
dT
dt
. (5.76)
Let q
c
kT
o
/h, so
q
=
dT
dy
, (5.77)
q
=
1
3
PrEc y
3
. (5.78)
For our ow, we have a cubic variation of the heat ux vector. There is no heat ux at the
centerline, which corresponds to this being a region of no shear. The magnitude of the heat
ux is maximum at the wall, the region of maximum shear. At the upper wall, we have
q
|
y=1/2
=
1
24
PrEc. (5.79)
The heat ux prole is sketched in Figure 5.5. In dimensional terms we have
q
w
kTo
h
=
1
24
(p
o
p
1
)
2
h
4
L
2
kT
o
, (5.80)
q
w
=
1
24
(p
o
p
1
)
2
h
3
L
2
. (5.81)
*
y = 1/2
y = -1/2
q
*
Figure 5.5: Heat ux prole for pressure gradient driven ow in a slot.
y = 0, u = 0
x
y
p = p
o
p = p
1
y = h, u = U
U
L
Figure 5.6: Conguration for Couette ow with pressure gradient.
5.1.2 Couette ow with pressure gradient
We next consider Couette ow with a pressure gradient. Couette ow implies that there is a
moving plate at one boundary and a xed plate at the other. It is a common experimental
conguration, and used often to actually determine a uids viscosity. Here we will take the
same assumptions as for pressure gradient driven ow in a slot, expect for the boundary
condition at the upper surface, which we will require to have a constant velocity U. We will
also shift the coordinates so that y = 0 matches the lower plate surface and y = h matches
the upper plate surface. The conguration for this ow is shown in Figure 5.6.
Our equations governing this ow are
d
2
u
dy
2
=
p
o
p
1
L
, u(0) = 0, u(h) = U, (5.82)
d
2
T
dy
2
=
k
_
du
dy
_
2
, T(0) = T
o
, T(h) = T
o
. (5.83)
Once again in momentum, there is no acceleration, and viscous stresses balance shear stresses.
In energy, there is no energy increase, and generation of thermal energy due to viscous work
is balanced by diusion of the thermal energy, ultimately out of the system through the
boundaries. Here there are inhomogeneities in both the forcing terms and the boundary
conditions. In terms of work, both the pressure gradient and the pulling of the plate induce
work.
Once again let us scale the equations. This time, we have a natural velocity scale, U, the
upper plate velocity. So take
y
=
y
h
, T
=
T T
o
T
o
, u
=
u
U
. (5.84)
The momentum equation becomes
U
h
2
d
2
u
dy
2
=
p
o
p
1
L
, (5.85)
d
2
u
dy
2
=
(p
o
p
1
)h
2
UL
, (5.86)
with dimensionless pressure gradient P
(p
o
p
1
)h
2
UL
, (5.87)
d
2
u
dy
2
= P, (5.88)
u
(0) = 0, u
(1) = 1. (5.89)
(5.90)
This has solution
u
=
1
2
Py
2
+ C
1
y
+ C
2
. (5.91)
Applying the boundary conditions, we get
0 =
1
2
P(0)
2
+ C
1
(0) + C
2
, (5.92)
0 = C
2
, (5.93)
1 =
1
2
P(1)
2
+ C
1
(1), (5.94)
C
1
= 1 +
1
2
P, (5.95)
u
=
1
2
Py
2
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
y
, (5.96)
u
=
1
2
Py
(1 y
)
. .
pressure eect
+ y
..
Couette eect
. (5.97)
We see that the pressure gradient generates a velocity prole that is quadratic in y
. This is
distinguished from the Couette eect, that is the eect of the upper plates motion, which
gives a linear prole. Because our governing equation here is linear, it is appropriate to
P

=

0
P

=

-

6
P

=

2
P
8
P
8
-
P

=

-

2
u = 0
*
u = 1
*
y = 0
*
y = 1
*
Figure 5.7: Velocity proles for various values of P for Couette ow with pressure gradient.
think of these as superposed solutions. Velocity proles for various values of P are shown in
Figure 5.7.
Let us now calculate the shear stress prole. With = (du/dy), and taking
= /
c
,
we get
=
U
h
du
dy
, (5.98)
=
U
h
c
du
dy
, (5.99)
taking
c

U
h
, (5.100)
=
du
dy
, so here, (5.101)
= Py
+
1
2
P + 1, and (5.102)
|
y=0
=
1
2
P + 1, (5.103)
|
y=1
=
1
2
P + 1. (5.104)
The wall shear has a pressure gradient eect and a Couette eect as well. In fact we can
select a pressure gradient to balance the Couette eect at one or the other wall, but not
both.
We can also calculate the dimensionless volume ow rate Q
, which for incompressible

ow, is directly proportional to the mass ux. Ignoring how the scaling would be done, we
arrive at
Q
=
_
1
0
u
dy
, (5.105)
=
_
1
0
_
1
2
Py
2
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
y
_
dy
, (5.106)
=
_
1
6
Py
3
_
1
0
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
y
2
1
0
, (5.107)
=
P
6
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
1
2
, (5.108)
=
P
12
+
1
2
. (5.109)
Again there is a pressure gradient contribution and a Couette contribution, and we could
select P to give no net volume ow rate.
We can summarize some of the special cases as follows
P : u
= (1/2)Py
(1 y
);
= P (1/2 y
), Q
= P/12. Here the uid ows

in the opposite direction as driven by the plate because of the large pressure gradient.
P = 6. Here we get no net mass ow and u
= 3y
2
2y
= 2y
, Q
= 0.
P = 2. Here we get no shear at the bottom wall and u
= y
2
= 2y
, Q
= 1/3.
P = 0. Here we have no pressure gradient and u
= y
= 1, Q
= 1/2.
P = 2. Here we get no shear at the top wall and u
= y
2
+ 2y
, = 2y
+ 2,
Q
= 2/3.
P : u
= (1/2)Py
(1 y
);
= P (1/2 y
), Q
= P/12. Here the uid ows

in the same direction as driven by the plate.
We now consider the heat transfer problem. Scaling, we get
T
o
h
2
d
2
T
dy
2
=
U
2
kh
2
_
du
dy
_
2
, T
(0) = T
(1) = 0, (5.110)
d
2
T
dy
2
=
U
2
kT
o
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.111)
=
c
k
U
2
cT
o
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.112)
= PrEc
_
du
dy
_
2
, (5.113)
= PrEc
2
, (5.114)
= PrEc
_
Py
+
1
2
P + 1
_
2
, (5.115)
= PrEc
_
P
2
y
2
2P
_
1
2
P + 1
_
y
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
_
, (5.116)
dT
dy
= PrEc
_
P
2
3
y
3
P
_
1
2
P + 1
_
y
2
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
y
_
+ C
1
, (5.117)
T
= PrEc
_
P
2
12
y
4
P
3
_
1
2
P + 1
_
y
3
+
1
2
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
y
2
_
+C
1
y
+ C
2
, (5.118)
T
(0) = 0 = C
2
, (5.119)
T
(1) = 0 = PrEc
_
P
2
12

P
3
_
1
2
P + 1
_
+
1
2
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
_
+ C
1
, (5.120)
C
1
= PrEc
_
1
2
+
P
6
+
P
2
24
_
, (5.121)
T
= PrEc
_
P
2
12
y
4
P
3
_
1
2
P + 1
_
y
3
+
1
2
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
y
2
_
+PrEc
_
1
2
+
P
6
+
P
2
24
_
y
. (5.122)
Factoring, we can write the temperature prole as
T
=
PrEc
24
y
(1 y
)(12 + 4P +P
2
8Py
2P
2
y
+ 2P
2
y
2
). (5.123)
For the wall heat transfer, recall q
y
= k(dT/dy). Scaling, we get
q
c
q
=
kT
o
h
dT
dy
, (5.124)
q
=
kT
o
hq
c
dT
dy
, (5.125)
choosing q
c

kT
o
h
, (5.126)
q
=
dT
dy
. (5.127)
So
q
= PrEc
_
P
2
3
y
3
P
_
1
2
P + 1
_
y
2
+
_
1 +
1
2
P
_
2
y
1
2

P
6

P
2
24
_
. (5.128)
At the bottom wall y
= 0, we get for the heat transfer vector

q
|
y=0
= PrEc
_
1
2
+
P
6
+
P
2
24
_
. (5.129)
5.2. SIMILARITY SOLUTIONS 297
U
x
y
Figure 5.8: Schematic for Stokes rst problem of a suddenly accelerated plate diusing
linear momentum into a uid at rest.
5.2 Similarity solutions
In this section, we will consider problems which can be addressed by what is known as a
similarity transformation. The problems themselves will be fundamental ones which have
variation in either time and one spatial coordinate, or with two spatial coordinates. This is in
contrast with solutions of the previous section which varied only with one spatial coordinate.
Since two coordinates are involved, we must resort to solving partial dierential equations.
The similarity transformation actually reveals a hidden symmetry of the partial dierential
equations by dening a new independent variable, which is a grouping of the original in-
dependent variables, under which the partial dierential equations transform into ordinary
dierential equations. We then solve the resulting ordinary dierential equations by standard
techniques.
5.2.1 Stokes rst problem
The rst problem we will consider which uses a similarity transformation is known as Stokes
rst problem, as Stokes addressed it in his original work which developed the Navier-Stokes
equations in the mid-nineteenth century.
5
The problem is described as follows, and is
sketched in Figure 5.8. Consider a at plate of innite extent lying at rest for t < 0 on
the y = 0 plane in x y z space. In the volume described by y > 0 exists a uid of semi-
innite extent which is at rest at time t < 0. At t = 0, the at plate is suddenly accelerated to
a constant velocity of U, entirely in the x direction. Because the no-slip condition is satised
for the viscous ow, this induces the uid at the plate surface to acquire an instantaneous
velocity of u(0) = U. Because of diusion of linear x momentum via tangential viscous shear
forces, the uid in the region above the plate begins to acquire a positive velocity in the x
direction as well. We will use the Navier-Stokes equations to quantify this behavior. Let
5
Stokes, G. G., 1851, On the eect of the internal friction of uids on the motion of pendulums, Trans-
actions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 9(2): 8-106.
us make identical assumptions as we did in the previous section, except that 1) we will not
neglect time derivatives, as they are an obviously important feature of the ow, and 2) we
will assume all pressure gradients are zero; hence the uid has a constant pressure.
Under these assumptions, the x momentum equation,

t
u + u

x
..
=0
u + v
..
=0
y
u + w

z
..
=0
u =
p
x
..
=0
+
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
u +

2
y
2
u +

2
z
2
..
=0
u
_
_
_
,
(5.130)
is the only relevant component of linear momenta, and reduces to
u
t
..
(mass)(acceleration)
=
2
u
y
2
. .
shear force
. (5.131)
The energy equation reduces as follows
c

t
T + c
_
_
_
u

x
..
=0
T + v
..
=0
y
T + w
..
=0
z
..
=0
T
_
_
_
= k
_
_
_
2
x
2
..
=0
T +

2
y
2
T +

2
z
2
..
=0
T
_
_
_
+2
(i
v
j)
(i
v
j)
, (5.132)
c
T
t
. .
energy increase
= k
2
T
y
2
. .
thermal diusion
+
_
u
y
_
2
. .
viscous work source
. (5.133)
Let us rst consider the x momentum equation. Recalling the momentum diusivity
denition = /, we get the following partial dierential equation, initial and boundary
conditions:
u
t
=
2
u
y
2
, (5.134)
u(y, 0) = 0, u(0, t) = U, u(, t) = 0. (5.135)
Now let us scale the equations. Choose
u
=
u
U
, t
=
t
t
c
, y
=
y
y
c
. (5.136)
We have yet to choose characteristic length, (y
c
), and time, (t
c
), scales. The equations
become
U
t
c
u
=
U
y
2
c
2
u
y
2
, (5.137)
u
=
t
c
y
2
c
2
u
y
2
. (5.138)
Wasting no time, we choose
y
c

U
=

U
. (5.139)
Noting the SI units, we see /(U) has units of length:
N s
m
2
m
3
kg
s
m
=
kg m
s
2
s
m
2
m
3
kg
s
m
= m. With
this choice, we get
t
c
y
2
c
=
t
c
U
2
2
=
t
c
U
2
. (5.140)
This suggests we choose
t
c
=

U
2
. (5.141)
With all of these choices the complete system can be written as
u
=

2
u
y
2
, (5.142)
u
(y
, 0) = 0, u
(0, t
) = 1, u
(, t
) = 0. (5.143)
Now for self-similarity, we seek transformation which reduce this partial dierential equation,
as well as its initial and boundary conditions, into an ordinary dierential equation with
suitable boundary conditions. If this transformation does not exist, no similarity solution
exists. In this, but not all cases, the transformation does exist.
Let us rst consider a general transformation from a y
, t
coordinate system to a new
coordinate system. We assume then a general transformation
(y
, t
), (5.144)
=

t
(y
, t
). (5.145)
We assume then that a general variable
which is a function of y
and t
also has the same

value at the transformed point
(y
, t
) =
). (5.146)
The chain rule then gives expressions for derivatives:
y
=

y
+

y
, (5.147)
t
=

t
+

t
. (5.148)
Now we will restrict ourselves to the transformation
= t
, (5.149)
so we have

t
t
y
= 1 and

t
y
t
= 0, so our rules for dierentiation reduce to
y
=

y
+

, (5.150)
t
=

t
. (5.151)
The next assumption is key for a similarity solution to exist. We restrict ourselves to
transformations for which
). That is we allow no dependence of
on

t
. Hence
we must require that

= 0. Moreover, partial derivatives of
become total derivatives,

giving us a nal form of transformations for the derivatives
y
=
d
y
, (5.152)
t
=
d
t
. (5.153)
In terms of operators we can say
y
=

y
d
d
, (5.154)
t
=

t
d
d
. (5.155)
Now returning to Stokes rst problem, let us assume that a similarity solution exists of
the form u
(y
, t
) = u
). It is not always possible to nd a similarity variable
. One
of the more robust ways to nd a similarity variable, if it exists, comes from group theory,
6
6
Group theory has a long history in mathematics and physics. Its complicated origins generally include
attribution to

Evariste Galois, 1811-1832, a somewhat romantic gure, as well as Niels Henrick Abel, 1802-
1829, the Norwegian mathematician. Critical developments were formalized by Marius Sophus Lie, 1842-
1899, another Norwegian mathematician, in what today is known as Lie group theory. A modern variant,
known as renormalization group (RNG) theory is an area for active research. The 1982 Nobel prize in
physics went to Kenneth Geddes Wilson, 1936-, of Cornell University and The Ohio State University, for use
of RNG in studying phase transitions, rst done in the 1970s. The award citation refers to the possibilities
of using RNG in studying the great unsolved problem of turbulence, a modern area of research in which
Steven Alan Orszag, 1943-2011, made many contributions.
Quoting from the useful Eric Weissteins World of Mathematics, available online at
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Group.html, A group G is a nite or innite set of elements together
with a binary operation which together satisfy the four fundamental properties of closure, associativity, the
identity property, and the inverse property. The operation with respect to which a group is dened is often
called the group operation, and a set is said to be a group under this operation. Elements A, B, C, . . .
with binary operations A and B denoted AB form a group if
1. Closure: If A and B are two elements in G, then the product AB is also in G.
and is explained in detail in the recent monograph by Cantwell. Group theory, which is too
detailed to explicate in full here, relies on a generalized symmetry of equations to nd simpler
forms. In the same sense that a snowake, subjected to rotations of /3, 2/3, , 4/3,
5/3, or 2, is transformed into a form which is indistinguishable from its original form,
we seek transformations of the variables in our partial dierential equation which map the
equation into a form which is indistinguishable from the original. When systems are subject
to such transformations, known as group operators, they are said to exhibit symmetry.
Let us subject our governing partial dierential equation along with initial and boundary
conditions to a particularly simple type of transformation, a simple stretching of space, time,
and velocity:
t = e
a
t
, y = e
b
y
, u = e
c
u
. (5.156)
Here the variables are stretched variables, and a, b, and c are constant parameters. The
exponential will be seen to be a convenience, which is not absolutely necessary. Note that
for a (, ), b (, ), c (, ), that e
a
(0, ), e
b
(0, ), e
c
(0, ).
So the stretching does not change the direction of the variable; that is it is not a reecting
transformation. We note that with this stretching, the domain of the problem remains
unchanged; that is t
[0, ) maps into

t [0, ); y
[0, ) maps into y [0, ).

The range is also unchanged if we allow u
[0, ), which maps into u [0, ). Direct

substitution of the transformation shows that in the stretched space, the system becomes
e
ac
u
t
= e
2bc
2
u
y
2
, (5.157)
e
c
u( y, 0) = 0, e
c
u(0,
t) = 1, e
c
u(,
t) = 0. (5.158)
In order that the stretching transformation map the system into a form indistinguishable
from the original, that is for the transformation to exhibit symmetry, we must take
c = 0, a = 2b. (5.159)
So our symmetry transformation is
t = e
2b
t
, y = e
b
y
, u = u
, (5.160)
2. Associativity: The dened multiplication is associative, i.e. for all A, B, C G, (AB)C = A(BC).
3. Identity: There is an identity element I (a.k.a. 1, E, or e) such that IA = AI = A for every element
A G.
4. Inverse: There must be an inverse or reciprocal of each element. Therefore, the set must contain an
element B = A
1
such that AA
1
= A
1
A = I for each element of G.
. . ., A map between two groups which preserves the identity and the group operation is called a homomor-
phism. If a homomorphism has an inverse which is also a homomorphism, then it is called an isomorphism
and the two groups are called isomorphic. Two groups which are isomorphic to each other are considered to
be the same when viewed as abstract groups. For example, the group of 90 degree rotations of a square
are isomorphic.
giving in transformed space
u
t
=

2
u
y
2
, (5.161)
u( y, 0) = 0, u(0,
t) = 1, u(,
t) = 0. (5.162)
Now both the original and transformed systems are the same, and the remaining stretching
parameter b does not enter directly into either formulation, so we cannot expect it in the
solution of either form. That is we expect a solution to be independent of the stretching
parameter b. This can be achieved if we take both u
and u to be functions of special

combinations of the independent variables, combinations that are formed such that b does
not appear. Eliminating b via
e
b
=
y
y
, (5.163)
we get
t
t
=
_
y
y
_
2
, (5.164)
or after rearrangement
y
=
y
t
. (5.165)
We thus expect u
= u
_
y
_
or equivalently u = u
_
y/
t
_
. This form also allows
u
= u
_
y
_
, where is any constant. Let us then dene our similarity variable
as
=
y
. (5.166)
Here the factor of 1/2 is simply a convenience adopted so that the solution takes on a
traditional form. We would nd that any constant in the similarity transformation would
induce a self-similar result.
Let us rewrite the dierential equation, boundary, and initial conditions (u
/t
2
u
/y
2
, u
(y
, 0) = 0, u
(0, t
) = 1, u
(, t
) = 0), in terms of the similarity variable
.
We rst must use the chain rule to get expressions for the derivatives. Applying the general
results just developed, we get
u
du
=
1
2
y
2
t
3/2
du
2t
du
, (5.167)
u
du
=
1
2
du
, (5.168)
2
u
y
2
=

y
_
u
_
=

y
_
1
2
du
_
, (5.169)
=
1
2
_
du
_
=
1
2
_
1
2
d
2
u
d
2
_
=
1
4t
d
2
u
d
2
. (5.170)
Thus, applying these rules to our governing linear momenta equation, we recover
2t
du
=
1
4t
d
2
u
d
2
, (5.171)
d
2
u
d
2
+ 2
du
= 0. (5.172)
Note our governing equation has a singularity at t
= 0. As it appears on both sides of

the equation, we cancel it on both sides, but we shall see that this point is associated with
special behavior of the similarity solution. The important result is that the reduced equation
has dependency on
only. If this did not occur, we could not have a similarity solution.
Now consider the initial and boundary conditions. They transform as follows:
y
= 0, =
= 0, (5.173)
y
, =
, (5.174)
t
0, =
. (5.175)
Note that the three important points for t
and y
collapse into two corresponding points in
. This is also necessary for the similarity solution to exist. Consequently, our conditions
in
space reduce to
u
(0) = 1, no slip, (5.176)

u
() = 0, initial and far-eld. (5.177)

We solve the second order dierential equation by the method of reduction of order, noticing
that it is really two rst order equations in disguise:
d
d
_
du
_
+ 2
_
du
_
= 0. (5.178)
multiplying by the integrating factor e
, (5.179)
e
d
d
_
du
_
+ 2
_
du
_
= 0. (5.180)
d
d
_
e
du
_
= 0, (5.181)
e
du
= A, (5.182)
du
= Ae
, (5.183)
u
= B + A
_

0
e
s
2
ds. (5.184)
Now applying the condition u
= 1 at
= 0 gives
1 = B + A
_
0
0
e
s
2
ds
. .
=0
, (5.185)
B = 1. (5.186)
So we have
u
= 1 + A
_

0
e
s
2
ds. (5.187)
Now applying the condition u
= 0 at
, we get
0 = 1 + A
_

0
e
s
2
ds
. .
=
/2
, (5.188)
0 = 1 + A
2
, (5.189)
A =
2
. (5.190)
Though not immediately obvious, it can be shown by a simple variable transformation to a
polar coordinate system that the above integral from 0 to has the value

/2. It is not
surprising that this integral has nite value over the semi-innite domain as the integrand
is bounded between zero and one, and decays rapidly to zero as s . Consequently, the
velocity prole can be written as
u
) = 1
2
_

0
e
s
2
ds, (5.191)
u
(y
, t
) = 1
2
_ y
2
t
0
e
s
2
ds, (5.192)
u
(y
, t
) = erfc
_
y
_
. (5.193)
In the last form above, we have introduced the so-called error function complement, erfc.
Plots for the velocity prole in terms of both
and y
, t
are given in Figure 5.9. We see

that in similarity space, the curve is a single curve that in which u
has a value of unity at
= 0 and has nearly relaxed to zero when
= 1. In dimensionless physical space, we see

that at early time, there is a thin momentum layer near the surface. At later time more
momentum is present in the uid. We can say in fact that momentum is diusing into the
uid.
We dene the momentum diusion length as the length for which signicant momentum
has diused into the uid. This is well estimated by taking
= 1. In terms of physical
variables, we have
y
= 1, (5.194)
y
= 2
, (5.195)
u
*
*
1
1
1
u
*
y
*
t =
1 *
t

=

2
*
t

=

3
*
Figure 5.9: Sketch of velocity eld solution for Stokes rst problem in both similarity
coordinate
and primitive coordinates y
, t
.
y
U
= 2
U
2
, (5.196)
y =
2
U
_
U
2
t
, (5.197)
y = 2
t. (5.198)
We can in fact dene this as a boundary layer thickness. That is to say the momentum
boundary layer thickness in Stokes rst problem grows at a rate proportional to the square
root of momentum diusivity and time. This class of result is a hallmark of all diusion
processes, be it mass, momentum, or energy.
Taking standard properties of air, we nd after one minute that its boundary layer
thickness is 0.01 m. For oil after one minute, we get a thickness of 0.002 m.
We next consider the shear stress eld. For this problem, the shear stress reduces to
simply
=
u
y
. (5.199)
Scaling as before by a characteristic stress
c
, we get
c
=
U
U
u
, (5.200)
=
U
2
c
u
. (5.201)
Taking
c
= U
2
/ = U
2
/(/) = U
2
, we get
=
u
=
1
2
du
, (5.202)
=
1
2
_
, (5.203)
=
1
, (5.204)
=
1
exp
_
_
2
. (5.205)
Now at the wall, y
= 0, and we get
|
y=0
=
1
. (5.206)
So the shear stress does not have a similarity solution, but is directly related to time variation.
The equation holds that the stress is innite at t
= 0, and decreases as time increases. This

is because the velocity gradient attens as time progresses. It can also be shown that while
the stress is unbounded at a single point in time, that the impulse over a nite time span
is nite, even when the time span includes t
= 0. It can also be shown that the ow

corresponds to a pulse of vorticity being introduced at the wall, which subsequently diuses
into the uid.
In dimensional terms, we can say
U
2
=
1
_
U
2
t
, (5.207)
=
U
2
t
, (5.208)
=
U
_
t
, (5.209)
=
U
t
. (5.210)
Now let us consider the heat transfer problem. Recall the governing equation, initial and
boundary conditions are
c
T
t
= k
2
T
y
2
+
_
u
y
_
2
, (5.211)
T(y, 0) = T
o
, T(0, t) = T
o
, T(, t) = T
o
. (5.212)
We will adopt the same time t
c
an length y
c
scales as before. Take the dimensionless tem-
perature to be
T
=
T T
o
T
o
. (5.213)
So we get
cT
o
t
c
T
=
kT
o
y
2
c
2
T
y
2
+
U
2
y
2
c
_
u
_
2
, (5.214)
T
=
kT
o
y
2
c
t
c
cT
o
2
T
y
2
+
U
2
y
2
c
t
c
cT
o
_
u
_
2
, (5.215)
now
k
y
2
c
t
c
c
=
kU
2
U
2
1
c
=
k
c
=
k
c
=
1
Pr
, (5.216)
T
2
y
2
c
t
c
cT
o
=
U
2
U
2
U
2
1
cT
o
=
U
2
cT
o
=
U
2
cT
o
= Ec. (5.217)
So we have in dimensionless form
T
=
1
Pr
2
T
y
2
+ Ec
_
u
_
2
, (5.218)
T
(y
, 0) = 0, T
(0, t
) = 0, T
(, t
) = 0. (5.219)
Notice that the only driving inhomogeneity is the viscous work. Now we know from our
solution of the linear momentum equation that
u
y
=
1
exp
_
y
2
4t
_
. (5.220)
So we can rewrite the equation for temperature variation as
T
=
1
Pr
2
T
y
2
+
Ec
t
exp
_
y
2
2t
_
, (5.221)
T
(y
, 0) = 0, T
(0, t
) = 0, T
(, t
) = 0. (5.222)
Before considering the general solution, let us consider some limiting cases.
Ec 0
In the limit as Ec 0, we get a trivial solution, T
(y
, t
) = 0.
Pr
Recalling that the Prandtl number is the ratio of momentum diusivity to thermal
diusivity, this limit corresponds to materials for which momentum diusivity is much
greater than thermal diusivity. For example for SAE 30 oil, the Prandtl number is
around 3500. Naively assuming that we can simply neglect conduction, we write the
energy equation in this limit as
T
=
Ec
t
exp
_
y
2
2t
_
. (5.223)
and with T
= T
) and
= y
/(2
), we get the transformed partial time deriva-

tive to be
T
2t
dT
. (5.224)
So the governing equation reduces to
2t
dT
=
Ec
t
e
2
2
, (5.225)
dT
=
2Ec
e
2
2
, (5.226)
T
=
2Ec
1
s
e
2s
2
ds. (5.227)
We cannot satisfy both boundary conditions; the equation has been solved so as to
satisfy the boundary condition in the far eld of T
() = 0.
Unfortunately, we notice that we cannot satisfy the boundary condition at
= 0.
We simply do not have enough degrees of freedom. In actuality, what we have found
is an outer solution, and to match the boundary condition at 0, we would have to
reintroduce conduction, which has a higher derivative.
First let us see how the outer solution behaves near
= 0. Expanding the dierential

equation in a Taylor series about
= 0 and solving gives

dT
=
2Ec
_
1
+ 2
3
+ . . .
_
, (5.228)
T
=
2Ec
_
ln
+
1
2
+ . . .
_
. (5.229)
It turns out that solving the inner layer problem and the matching is of about the
same diculty as solving the full general problem, so we will defer this until later in
this section.
Pr 0
In this limit, we get
2
T
y
2
= 0. (5.230)
The solution which satises the boundary conditions is
T
= 0. (5.231)
In this limit, momentum diuses slowly relative to energy. So we can interpret the
results as follows. In the boundary layer, momentum is generated in a thin layer.
Viscous dissipation in this layer gives rise to a local change in temperature in the layer
which rapidly diuses throughout the entire ow. The eect of smearing a localized
nite thermal energy input over a semi-innite domain has a negligible inuence on
the temperature of the global domain.
So let us bring back diusion and study solutions for nite Prandtl number. Our gov-
erning equation in similarity variables then becomes
2t
dT
=
1
Pr
1
4t
d
2
T
d
2
+
Ec
t
e
2
2
, (5.232)
2
dT
=
1
Pr
d
2
T
d
2
+
4Ec
e
2
2
, (5.233)
d
2
T
d
2
+ 2Pr
dT
=
4
EcPr e
2
2
, (5.234)
T
(0) = 0, T
() = 0. (5.235)
The second order dierential equation is really two rst order dierential equations in dis-
guise. There is an integrating factor of e
Pr
2
. Multiplying by the integrating factor and

operating on the system, we nd
e
Pr
2
d
2
T
d
2
+ 2Pr
e
Pr
2
dT
=
4
EcPr e
(Pr2)
2
, (5.236)
d
d
_
e
Pr
2
dT
_
=
4
EcPr e
(Pr2)
2
, (5.237)
e
Pr
2
dT
=
4
EcPr
_

0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds + C
1
, (5.238)
dT
=
4
EcPr e
Pr
2
_

0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds + C
1
e
Pr
2
, (5.239)
T
=
4
EcPr
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp
+C
1
_

0
e
Pr s
2
ds + C
2
. (5.240)
The boundary condition T
(0) = 0 gives us C
2
= 0. The boundary condition at gives us
then
0 =
4
EcPr
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp + C
1
_

0
e
Pr s
2
ds
. .
1
2
_

Pr
. (5.241)
(5.242)
Therefore, we get
4
EcPr
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp =
C
1
2
_

Pr
, (5.243)
C
1
=
8
3/2
EcPr
3/2
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp. (5.244)
So nally, we have for the temperature prole
T
) =
4
EcPr
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp
+
_
8
3/2
EcPr
3/2
_

0
e
Pr p
2
_
p
0
e
(Pr2)s
2
ds dp
__

0
e
Pr s
2
ds. (5.245)
This simplies somewhat to
2EcPr
_
(2 Pr)
__

0
e
Pr p
2
erf
_
2 Pr p
_
dp erf
_
Pr
_
_

0
e
Pr p
2
erf
_
2 Pr p
_
dp
_
.
(5.246)
This analysis simplies considerably in the limit of Pr = 1, that is when momentum and
energy diuse at the same rate. This is a close to reality for many gases. In this case, the
temperature prole becomes
T
) =
4
Ec
_

0
e
p
2
_
p
0
e
s
2
ds dp + C
1
_

0
e
s
2
ds. (5.247)
Now if h(p) =
_
p
0
e
s
2
ds, we get dh/dp = e
p
2
. Using this, we can rewrite the temperature
prole as
T
) =
4
Ec
_

0
h(p)
dh
dp
dp + C
1
_

0
e
s
2
ds, (5.248)
=
4Ec
_

0
d
_
h
2
2
_
+ C
1
_

0
e
s
2
ds, (5.249)
=
4Ec
_
1
2
___

0
e
s
2
ds
_
2
+ C
1
_

0
e
s
2
ds, (5.250)
=
_
2Ec
_

0
e
s
2
ds + C
1
__

0
e
s
2
ds. (5.251)
Now for T() = 0, we get
0 =
_
2Ec
_

0
e
s
2
ds + C
1
__

0
e
s
2
ds, (5.252)
0 =
_
2Ec
2
+ C
1
_
2
, (5.253)
C
1
=
Ec
. (5.254)
So the temperature prole can be expressed as
T
) =
Ec
__

0
e
s
2
ds
__
1
2
_

0
e
s
2
ds
_
. (5.255)
T
*
Pr = 1
Ec = 1
3
0
0.12
1
2
*
Figure 5.10: Plot of temperature eld for Stokes rst problem for Pr = 1, Ec = 1.
We notice that we can write this directly in terms of the velocity as
T
) =
Ec
2
u
) (1 u
)) . (5.256)
This is a consequence of what is known as Reynolds analogy which holds for Pr = 1 that
the temperature eld can be directly related to the velocity eld. The temperature eld for
Stokes rst problem for Pr = 1, Ec = 1 is plotted in Figure 5.10.
5.2.2 Blasius boundary layer
We next consider the well known problem of the ow of a viscous uid over a at plate. This
problem forms the foundation for a variety of viscous ows over more complicated geometries.
It also illustrates some important features of viscous ow physics, as well as giving the original
motivating problem for the mathematical technique of matched asymptotic expansions. Here
we will consider, as sketched in Figure 5.11, the incompressible ow of viscous uid of
constant viscosity and thermal conductivity over a at plate. In the far eld, the uid will
be a uniform stream with constant velocity. At the plate surface, the no-slip condition must
be enforced, which will give rise to a zone of adjustment where the uids velocity changes
from zero at the plate surface to its freestream value. This zone is called the boundary layer.
Considering rst the velocity eld, we nd, assuming the ow is steady as well, that the
dimensionless two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations are as follows
u
x
+
v
y
= 0, (5.257)
x
y
u
o
Figure 5.11: Schematic for at plate boundary layer problem.
u
u
x
+ v
u
y
=
p
x
+
1
Re
_
2
u
x
2
+

2
u
y
2
_
, (5.258)
u
v
x
+ v
v
y
=
p
y
+
1
Re
_
2
v
x
2
+

2
v
y
2
_
. (5.259)
The dimensionless boundary conditions are
u(x, y ) = 1, (5.260)
v(x, y ) = 0, (5.261)
p(x, y ) = 0, (5.262)
u(x, 0) = 0, (5.263)
v(x, 0) = 0. (5.264)
In this section, we are dispensing with the s and assuming all variables are dimensionless.
In fact we have assumed a scaling of the following form, where dim is a subscript denoting
a dimensional variable.
u =
u
dim
u
o
, v =
v
dim
u
o
, x =
x
dim
L
, y =
y
dim
L
, p =
p
dim
p
o
u
2
o
. (5.265)
Note for our at plate of semi-innite extent, we do not have a natural length scale. This
suggests that we may nd a similarity solution which removes the eect of L.
Now let us consider that for Re , we have an outer solution of u = 1 to be valid
for most of the ow eld suciently far away from the plate surface. In fact the solution
u = 1, v = 0, p = 0, satises all of the governing equations and boundary conditions except
for the no slip condition at y = 0. Because in the limit as Re , we eectively ignore the
high order derivatives found in the viscous terms, we cannot expect to satisfy all boundary
conditions for the full problem. We call this the outer solution, which is also an inviscid
solution to the equations, allowing for a slip condition at the boundary.
Let us rescale our equations near the plate surface y = 0 to
bring back the eect of the viscous terms,
bring back the no-slip condition, and
match our inviscid outer solution to a viscous inner solution.
This is the rst example of the use of the method of matched asymptotic expansions as
introduced by Prandtl and his student Blasius in the early twentieth century.
With some diculty, we could show how to choose the scaling, let us simply adopt a
scaling and show that it indeed achieves our desired end. So let us take a scaled y distance
and velocity, denoted by asuperscript, to be
v =
Re v, y =
Re y. (5.266)
With this scaling, assuming the Reynolds number is large, when we examine small y or
v, we are examining an order unity y or v. Our equations rescale as
u
x
+
1/
Re
1/
Re
v
y
= 0, (5.267)
u
u
x
+
1/
Re
1/
Re
v
u
y
=
p
x
+
1
Re
_
2
u
x
2
+ Re
2
u
y
2
_
, (5.268)
1
Re
u
v
x
+
(1/
Re)(1/
Re)
1/
Re
v
v
y
=
1
1/
Re
p
y
+
1
Re
_
1
Re
2
v
x
2
+
1/
Re
1/Re
2
v
y
2
_
. (5.269)
Simplifying, this reduces to
u
x
+
v
y
= 0, (5.270)
u
u
x
+ v
u
y
=
p
x
+
1
Re
2
u
x
2
+

2
u
y
2
, (5.271)
u
v
x
+ v
v
y
= Re
p
y
+
1
Re
2
v
x
2
+

2
v
y
2
. (5.272)
Now in the limit as Re , the rescaled equations reduce to the well known boundary
layer equations:
u
x
+
v
y
= 0, (5.273)
u
u
x
+ v
u
y
=
p
x
+

2
u
y
2
, (5.274)
0 =
p
y
. (5.275)
To match the outer solution, we need the boundary conditions which are
u(x, y ) = 1, (5.276)
v(x, y ) = 0, (5.277)
p(x, y ) = 0, (5.278)
u(x, 0) = 0, (5.279)
v(x, 0) = 0. (5.280)
The y momentum equation gives us
p = p(x). (5.281)
In general, we can consider this to be an imposed pressure gradient which is supplied by
the outer inviscid solution. For general ows, that pressure gradient dp/dx will be non-zero.
For the Blasius problem, we will choose to study problems for which there is no pressure
gradient. That is we take
p(x) = 0, for Blasius at plate boundary layer. (5.282)
So called Falkner-Skan solutions consider ows over curved plates, for which the outer inviscid
solution does not have a constant pressure. This ultimately aects the behavior of the uid
in the boundary layer, giving results which dier in important features from our Blasius
problem.
With our assumptions, the Blasius problem reduces to
u
x
+
v
y
= 0, (5.283)
u
u
x
+ v
u
y
=

2
u
y
2
. (5.284)
The boundary conditions are now only on velocity and are
u(x, y ) = 1, (5.285)
v(x, y ) = 0, (5.286)
u(x, 0) = 0, (5.287)
v(x, 0) = 0. (5.288)
Now to simplify, we invoke the stream function , which allows us to satisfy continuity
automatically and eliminate u and v at the expense of raising the order of the dierential
equation. So taking
u =

y
, v =
x
, (5.289)
we nd that mass conservation reduces to

2
x y

2
yx
= 0. The x momentum equation and
associated boundary conditions become
x y

x
y
2
=

3
y
3
, (5.290)
y
(x, y ) = 1, (5.291)
x
(x, y ) = 0, (5.292)
y
(x, 0) = 0, (5.293)
x
(x, 0) = 0. (5.294)
Let us try stretching all the variables of this system to see if there are stretching transforma-
tions under which the system exhibits symmetry; that is we seek a stretching transformation
under which the system is invariant. Take
x = e
a
x, y = e
b
y,

= e
c
. (5.295)
Under this transformation, the x-momentum equation and boundary conditions transform
to
e
a+2b2c
x y
e
a+2b2c
y
2
= e
3bc
y
3
, (5.296)
e
bc
y
( x, y ) = 1, (5.297)
e
ac
x
( x, y ) = 0, (5.298)
e
bc
y
( x, 0) = 0, (5.299)
e
ac
x
( x, 0) = 0. (5.300)
If we demand b = c and a = 2c, then the transformation is invariant, yielding
x y

y
2
=

3

y
3
, (5.301)
y
( x, y ) = 1, (5.302)
x
( x, y ) = 0, (5.303)
y
( x, 0) = 0, (5.304)
x
( x, 0) = 0. (5.305)
Now our transformation is reduced to
x = e
2c
x, y = e
c
y,

= e
c
. (5.306)
Since c does not appear explicitly in either the original equation set nor the transformed
equation set, the solution must not depend on this stretching. Eliminating c from the
transformation by e
c
=
_
x/x we nd that
y
y
=
_
x
x
,
=
_
x
x
, (5.307)
or
y
x
=
y
x
,
x
=

x
. (5.308)
Thus motivated, let us seek solutions of the form
x
= f
_
y
x
_
. (5.309)
That is taking
=
y
x
, (5.310)
we seek
=
xf(). (5.311)
Let us check that our similarity variable is independent of L our unknown length scale.
=
y
x
=
Re y
x
=
Re y
dim
/L
_
x
dim
/L
=
_
u
o
L
y
dim
L
x
dim
=
_
u
o
y
dim
x
dim
. (5.312)
So indeed, our similarity variable is independent of any arbitrary length scale we happen to
have chosen.
With our similarity transformation, we have
x
=
1
2
yx
3/2
=
1
2
x
, (5.313)
y
=
1
x
. (5.314)
Now we need expressions for /x, / y,
2
/x y,
2
/ y
2
, and
3
/ y
3
. First, con-
sider the partial derivatives of the stream function . Operating on each partial derivative,
we nd
x
=

x
_
xf()
_
=
x
df
d
x
+
1
2
1
x
f, (5.315)
=
x
_
1
2
_
x
df
d
+
1
2
1
x
f =
1
2
x
_
f
df
d
_
, (5.316)
so v =
1
2
x
_
f
df
d
_
. (5.317)
y
=

y
_
xf()
_
=
x

y
(f()) =
x
df
d
y
=
x
df
d
1
x
=
df
d
, (5.318)
so u =

y
=
df
d
. (5.319)
x y
=

x
_
y
_
=

x
_
df
d
_
=
d
2
f
d
2
x
=
1
2x
d
2
f
d
2
. (5.320)
y
2
=

y
_
y
_
=

y
_
df
d
_
=
d
2
f
d
2
y
=
1
x
d
2
f
d
2
. (5.321)
y
3
=

y
_
y
2
_
=

y
_
1
x
d
2
f
d
2
_
=
1
y
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
=
1
x
d
3
f
d
3
y
, (5.322)
=
1
x
d
3
f
d
3
. (5.323)
Now we substitute each of these expressions into the x momentum equation and get
df
d
_
1
2x
d
2
f
d
2
_
1
2
x
_
f
df
d
_
1
x
d
2
f
d
2
=
1
x
d
3
f
d
3
, (5.324)
df
d
d
2
f
d
2

_
f
df
d
_
d
2
f
d
2
= 2
d
3
f
d
3
, (5.325)
f
d
2
f
d
2
= 2
d
3
f
d
3
, (5.326)
d
3
f
d
3
+
1
2
f
d
2
f
d
2
= 0. (5.327)
This is a third order non-linear ordinary dierential equation for f(). We need three
boundary conditions. Now at the surface y = 0, we have = 0. And as y , we have
. To satisfy the no-slip condition on u at the plate surface, we require
df
d
=0
= 0. (5.328)
For no-slip on v, we require
v(0) = 0 =
1
2
x
_
f
df
d
_
, (5.329)
0 = f(0) 0
df
d
=0
. .
=0
, (5.330)
f(0) = 0. (5.331)
And to satisfy the freestream condition on u as , we need
df
d
= 1. (5.332)
The most standard way to solve non-linear ordinary dierential equations of this type is to
reduce them to systems of rst order ordinary dierential equations and use some numerical
technique, such as a Runge
7
-Kutta integration. We recall that Runge-Kutta techniques, as
well as most other common techniques, require a well-dened set of initial conditions to
predict the nal state. To achieve the desired form, we dene
g
df
d
, h
d
2
f
d
2
. (5.333)
Thus the x momentum equation becomes
dh
d
+
1
2
fh = 0. (5.334)
But this is one equation in three unknowns. We need to write our equations as a system of
three rst order equations, along with associated initial conditions. They are
df
d
= g, f(0) = 0, (5.335)
dg
d
= h, g(0) = 0, (5.336)
dh
d
=
1
2
fh, h(0) =?. (5.337)
Everything is well-dened except we do not have an initial condition on h. We do however
have a far-eld condition on g which is g() = 1. One viable option we have for getting a
nal solution is to use a numerical trial and error procedure, guessing h(0) until we nd that
g() 1. We will use a slightly more ecient method here, which only requires one guess.
To do this, let us rst demonstrate the following lemma: If F() is a solution to d
3
f/d
3
+
1
2
f(d
2
f/d
2
) = 0, then aF(a) is also a solution. The proof is as follows. Take w() =
7
Carl David Tolm`e Runge, 1856-1927, German mathematician and physicist, close friend of Max Planck,
studied spectral line elements of non-Hydrogen molecules, held chairs at Hannover and Gottingen, entertained
grandchildren at age 70 by doing handstands.
aF(a). Then we have
w = aF(a), (5.338)
dw
d
= a
2
dF(a)
d
, (5.339)
d
2
w
d
2
= a
3
d
2
F(a)
d
2
, (5.340)
d
3
w
d
3
= a
4
d
3
F(a)
d
3
. (5.341)
Substituting these expressions into the x momentum equation, we nd
a
4
d
3
F(a)
d
3
+
1
2
a
4
F(a)
d
2
F(a)
d
2
= 0, (5.342)
d
3
F(a)
d
3
+
1
2
F(a)
d
2
F(a)
d
2
= 0. (5.343)
But we know this to be true as F(a) is a solution. Hence aF(a) is also a solution.
So to solve our non-linear system, let us rst solve the following related system:
dF
d
= G, F(0) = 0, (5.344)
dG
d
= H, G(0) = 0, (5.345)
dH
d
=
1
2
FH, H(0) = 1. (5.346)
After one numerical integration, we nd that with this guess for H(0) that
G() = 2.08540918... (5.347)
Now our numerical solution also gives us F, and so we know that f = aF(a) is also a
solution. Moreover
df
d
= a
2
dF(a)
d
, that is (5.348)
g() = a
2
G(a). (5.349)
Now we want g() = 1, so take 1 = a
2
G(), so a
2
= 1/G(). So
a =
1
_
G()
. (5.350)
1
5
0
1
2
3
4
*
u
*
Figure 5.12: Velocity prole for Blasius boundary layer.
Now
d
2
f
d
2
= a
3
d
2
F(a)
d
2
, (5.351)
d
2
f
d
2
=0
= a
3
d
2
F(a)
d
2
=0
, (5.352)
h(0) = a
3
H(0), (5.353)
h(0) = a
3
(1), (5.354)
h(0) = a
3
= G
3/2
(), (5.355)
h(0) = (2.08540918...)
3/2
= 0.332057335... (5.356)
This is the proper choice for the initial condition on h. Numerically integrating once more,
we get the behavior of f, g, and h as functions of which indeed satises the condition at
. A plot of u = df/d as a function of is shown in Figure 5.12. From this plot, we see
that when = 5, the velocity has nearly acquired the freestream value of u = 1. In fact,
examination of the numerical results shows that when = 4.9, that the u component of
velocity has 0.99 of its freestream value. As the velocity only reaches its freestream value at
, we dene the boundary layer thickness,
0.99
, as that value of y
dim
for which the velocity
has 0.99 of its freestream value. Recalling that
=
_
u
o
y
dim
x
dim
, (5.357)
we say that
4.9 =
_
u
o
0.99
x
dim
. (5.358)
Rearranging, we get
0.99
x
dim
= 4.9
_

u
o
x
dim
, (5.359)
= 4.9Re
1/2
x
dim
. (5.360)
Here we have taken a Reynolds number based on local distance to be
Re
x
dim
=
u
o
x
dim
. (5.361)
This formula is valid for laminar ows, and has been seen to be valid for Re
x
dim
< 3 10
6
.
For greater lengths, there can be a transition to turbulent ow. For water owing a 1 m/s
and a downstream distance of 1 m, we nd
0.99
= 0.5 cm. For air under the same conditions,
we nd
0.99
= 1.9 cm. We also note that the boundary layer grows with the square root
of distance along the plate. We further note that higher kinematic viscosity leads to thicker
boundary layers, while lower kinematic viscosity lead to thinner boundary layers.
Now let us determine the shear stress at the wall, and the viscous force acting on the
wall. So let us nd
w
=
u
dim
y
dim
y
dim
=0
. (5.362)
Consider
u
y
=

2
y
2
=
1
x
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.363)
_
u
dim
uo
_
__
uoL
y
dim
L
_ =
1
_
x
dim
L
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.364)
u
dim
y
dim
= u
o
_
u
o
x
dim
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.365)
=
u
dim
y
dim
= u
o
_
u
o
x
dim
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.366)
(0)
1
2
u
2
o
= C
f
= 2
_

u
o
x
dim
d
2
f
d
2
(0), (5.367)
C
f
= 2(Re
x
dim
)
1/2
d
2
f
d
2
(0), (5.368)
C
f
=
0.664...
_
Re
x
dim
. (5.369)
We notice that at x
dim
= 0 that the stress is innite. This seeming problem is seen not to be
one when we consider the actual viscous force on a nite length of plate. Consider a plate
of length L and width b. Then the viscous force acting on the plate is
F =
_
L
0
dA, (5.370)
=
_
L
0
(x
dim
, 0)bdx
dim
, (5.371)
= b
_
L
0
f
(0)u
o
u
o
x
dim
dx
dim
, (5.372)
= bf
(0)u
o
u
o
_
L
0
dx
dim
x
dim
, (5.373)
= bf
(0)u
o
u
o
(2
x
dim
)
L
0
, (5.374)
= 2bf
(0)u
o
u
o
L, (5.375)
F
1
2
u
2
o
Lb
= C
D
= 4f
(0)
_

u
o
L
= 4f
(0)Re
1/2
L
= 1.328Re
1/2
L
. (5.376)
Now let us consider the thermal boundary layer. Here we will take the boundary condi-
tions so that the wall and far eld are held at a constant xed temperature T
dim
= T
o
. We
need to do the scaling on the energy equation, so let us start with the steady incompressible
two-dimensional dimensional energy equation:
c
p
_
u
dim
T
dim
x
dim
+ v
dim
T
dim
y
dim
_
= k
_
2
T
dim
x
2
dim
+

2
T
dim
y
2
dim
_
(5.377)
+
_
2
_
u
dim
x
dim
_
2
+ 2
_
v
dim
y
dim
_
2
+
_
u
dim
y
dim
+
v
dim
x
dim
_
2
_
.
Taking as before,
x =
x
dim
L
, y =
y
dim
L
, T =
T
dim
T
o
T
o
, u =
u
dim
u
o
, v =
v
dim
u
o
. (5.378)
Making these substitutions, we get
c
p
u
o
T
o
L
_
u
T
x
+ v
T
y
_
=
kT
o
L
2
_
2
T
x
2
+

2
T
y
2
_
(5.379)
+
u
2
o
L
2
_
2
_
u
x
_
2
+ 2
_
v
y
_
2
+
_
u
y
+
v
x
_
2
_
,
u
T
x
+ v
T
y
=
k
c
p
u
o
L
_
2
T
x
2
+

2
T
y
2
_
(5.380)
+
u
o
c
p
LT
o
_
2
_
u
x
_
2
+ 2
_
v
y
_
2
+
_
u
y
+
v
x
_
2
_
.
(5.381)
Now we have
k
c
p
u
o
L
=
k
c
p
u
o
L
=
1
Pr
1
Re
, (5.382)
u
o
c
p
LT
o
=

u
o
L
u
2
o
c
p
T
o
=
Ec
Re
. (5.383)
So the dimensionless energy equation with boundary conditions can be written as
u
T
x
+ v
T
y
=
1
PrRe
_
2
T
x
2
+

2
T
y
2
_
(5.384)
+
Ec
Re
_
2
_
u
x
_
2
+ 2
_
v
y
_
2
+
_
u
y
+
v
x
_
2
_
,
T(x, 0) = 0, T(x, ) = 0. (5.385)
Now as Re , we see that T = 0 is a solution that satises the energy equation and
all boundary conditions. For nite Reynolds number, non-zero velocity gradients generate
a temperature eld. Once again, we rescale in the boundary layer using v =
Re v, and
y =
Re y. This gives
u
T
x
+
1
Re
1
1/
Re
v
T
y
=
1
PrRe
_
2
T
x
2
+ Re
2
T
y
2
_
(5.386)
+
Ec
Re
_
2
_
u
x
_
2
+ 2
_
v
y
_
2
+
_
Re
u
y
+
1
Re
v
x
_
2
_
.
u
T
x
+ v
T
y
=
1
Pr
_
1
Re
2
T
x
2
+

2
T
y
2
_
(5.387)
+Ec
_
2
Re
_
u
x
_
2
+
2
Re
_
v
y
_
2
+
_
u
y
+
1
Re
v
x
_
2
_
.
as Re , (5.388)
u
T
x
+ v
T
y
=
1
Pr
2
T
y
2
+ Ec
_
u
y
_
2
. (5.389)
Now take T = T() with = y/
x as well as u = df/d, v = (1/(2
x)) (f (df/d))
and u/ y = (1/
x)(d
2
f/d
2
). We also have for derivatives, that
T
x
=
dT
d
x
=
dT
d
_
1
2
x
_
, (5.390)
T
y
=
dT
d
y
=
dT
d
1
x
, (5.391)
2
T
y
2
=

y
_
T
y
_
=

y
_
1
x
dT
d
_
=
1
y
dT
d
=
1
x
d
2
T
d
2
. (5.392)
The energy equation is then rendered as
df
d
_
1
2
x
dT
d
_
+
_
1
2
x
_
f
df
d
__
1
x
dT
d
=
1
Pr
1
x
d
2
T
d
2
+
Ec
x
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
,(5.393)
1
2
df
d
dT
d

1
2
_
f
df
d
_
dT
d
=
1
Pr
d
2
T
d
2
+ Ec
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.394)
1
2
f
dT
d
=
1
Pr
d
2
T
d
2
+ Ec
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.395)
d
2
T
d
2
+
1
2
Pr f
dT
d
= PrEc
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.396)
T(0) = 0, T() = 0. (5.397)
Now for Ec 0, we get T = 0 as a solution which satises the governing dierential
equation and boundary conditions. Let us consider a solution for non-trivial Ec, but for
Pr = 1. We could extend this for general values of Pr as well. Here, following Reynolds
analogy, when thermal diusivity equals momentum diusivity, we expect the temperature
eld to be directly related to the velocity eld. For Pr = 1, the energy equation reduces to
d
2
T
d
2
+
1
2
f
dT
d
= Ec
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.398)
T(0) = 0, T() = 0. (5.399)
Here the integrating factor is
e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
. (5.400)
Multiplying the energy equation by the integrating factor gives
e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
d
2
T
d
2
+
1
2
fe
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
dT
d
= Ec e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.401)
d
d
_
e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
dT
d
_
= Ec e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
_
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
. (5.402)
Now from the x momentum equation, f
+
1
2
ff
= 0, we have
f = 2
f
. (5.403)
So we can rewrite the integrating factor as
e
R
0
1
2
f(t)dt
= e
R
0
1
2
(2)f
dt
= e
ln
()
f
(0)
=
f
(0)
f
()
. (5.404)
So the energy equation can be written as
d
d
_
f
(0)
f
()
dT
d
_
= Ec
_
f
(0)
f
()
__
d
2
f
d
2
_
2
, (5.405)
= Ecf
(0)
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.406)
f
(0)
f
()
dT
d
= Ecf
(0)
_

0
d
2
f
ds
2
ds + C
1
, (5.407)
dT
d
= Ec
d
2
f
d
2
_

0
d
2
f
ds
2
ds + C
1
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.408)
= = Ec
d
2
f
d
2
_
_
df
d
f
(0)
. .
=0
_
_
+ C
1
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.409)
= Ec
d
2
f
d
2
df
d
+ C
1
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.410)
= Ec
d
d
_
1
2
_
df
d
_
2
_
+ C
1
d
2
f
d
2
, (5.411)
T =
Ec
2
_
df
d
_
2
+ C
1
df
d
+ C
2
, (5.412)
T(0) = 0 =
Ec
2
(f
(0)
. .
=0
)
2
+ C
1
f
(0)
. .
=0
+C
2
, (5.413)
C
2
= 0, (5.414)
T() = 0 =
Ec
2
(f
()
. .
=1
)
2
+ C
1
f
()
. .
=1
, (5.415)
C
1
=
Ec
2
, (5.416)
T() =
Ec
2
df
d
_
1
df
d
_
, (5.417)
T() =
Ec
2
u()(1 u()). (5.418)
A plot of the temperature prole for Pr = 1 and Ec = 1 is given in Figure 5.13.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
*
T
*
Pr = 1
Ec = 1
Figure 5.13: Temperature prole for Blasius boundary layer, Ec = 1, Pr = 1.
Bibliography
This bibliography focuses on books which are closely related to the material presented in
this course in classical uid mechanics, especially with regards to graduate level treatment
of continuum mechanical principles applied to uids, compressible ow, viscous ow, and
vortex dynamics. It also has some general works of historic importance. It is by no means
a comprehensive survey of works on uid mechanics. Only a few works are given here
which focus on such important topics as low Reynolds number ows, turbulence, bio-uids,
computational uid dynamics, microuids, molecular dynamics, magneto-hydrodynamics,
geo-physical ows, rheology, astrophysical ows, as well as elementary undergraduate texts.
That said, those which are listed are among the best that exist and would be useful to
examine.
I. H. Abbott, Theory of Wing Sections, Dover, New York, 1980.
D. J. Acheson, Elementary Fluid Dynamics, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1990.
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow with Historical Perspective, second ed., McGraw-
Hill, New York, 1989.
J. D. Anderson, Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York,
1989.
R. Aris, Vectors, Tensors, and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics, Dover, New York,
1962.
H. Ashley and M. Landahl, Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies, Dover, New York, 1985.
G. I. Barenblatt, Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics, Cambridge, New
York, 1996.
G. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1967.
J. Bear, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover, New York, 1988.
R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, Second Edition,
John Wiley, New York, 2001.
327
R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol. 1:
Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 2: Kinetic Theory, John Wiley, New York, 1987.
A. I. Borisenko and I. E. Tarapov, Vector and Tensor Analysis with Applications, Dover,
New York, 1968.
R. S. Brodkey, The Phenomena of Fluid Motions, Dover, New York, 1995.
B. J. Cantwell, Introduction to Symmetry Analysis, Cambridge, New York, 2002.
S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability, Dover, New York, 1961.
S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases, Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1939.
R. Chevray and J. Mathieu, Topics in Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1993.
A. J. Chorin and J. E. Marsden, A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 3rd
edition, Springer, New York, 1993.
R. Courant and K. O. Friedrichs, Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Springer, New York,
1976.
W. O. Criminale, T. L. Jackson, and R. D. Joslin, Theory and Computation in Hydrody-
namic Stability, Cambridge, Cambridge, 2003.
I. G. Currie, Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids, 3rd edition, Marcel-Dekker, New York,
2003.
S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Dover, New York, 1984.
P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid, Hydrodynamic Stability, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1981.
P. G. Drazin, Introduction to Hydrodynamic Stability, Cambridge, Cambridge, 2002.
D. A. Drew and S. L. Passman, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, Springer, New York,
1999.
G. Emanuel, Analytical Fluid Dynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1994.
G. Emanuel, Gasdynamics: Theory and Applications, AIAA, New York, 1986.
A. C. Eringen, Mechanics of Continua, second edition, Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1989.
J. H. Ferziger and M. Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, third edition,
Springer, New York, 2001.
R. P. Feynman, Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1970.
328
R. W. Fox and A. T. McDonald, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 5th edition, John Wiley,
New York, 1998.
Y. C. Fung, Foundations of Solid Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clis, New Jersey,
1965.
M. Gad-el-Hak, Flow Control: Passive, Active and Reactive Flow Management, Cambridge
Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000.
H. Glauert, The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1983.
S. Goldstein, ed., Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, Vols. I and II, Dover, New
York, 1965.
R. A. Granger, Fluid Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1995.
W. D. Hayes and R. F. Probstein, Hypersonic Flow Theory, Academic Press, New York,
1959.
H. Helmholtz, On the Sensations of Tone, Dover, New York, 1954.
C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Vols. 1 and 2, John
Wiley, New York, 1989.
J. O. Hirschfelder, C. F. Curtiss, and R. B. Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids,
Wiley, New York, 1954.
R. T. Jones, Wing Theory, Princeton, Princeton, 1990.
D. D. Joseph, Fluid Dynamics of Viscoelastic Liquids, Springer, New York, 1990.
G. E. Karniadakis and A. Beskok, Microows: Fundamentals and Simulation, Springer
Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
G. E. Karniadakis and S. J. Sherwin, Spectral/HP Element Methods for CFD, Oxford,
Oxford, 1998.
E. L. Koschmieder, B`enard Cells and Taylor Vortices, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1993.
A. M. Kuethe and C.-Y. Chow, Foundations of Aerodynamics: Bases of Aerodynamic De-
sign, Fifth Edition, John Wiley, New York, 1998.
P. K. Kundu and I. M. Cohen, Fluid Mechanics, Fourth Edition, Academic Press, Amster-
dam 2007.
H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, 6th edition, Dover, New York, 1993.
C. B. Laney, Computational Gasdynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1998.
329
M. T. Landahl, Unsteady Transonic Flow, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1989.
L. D. Landau, and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1959.
G. L. Leal, Laminar Flow and Convective Transport Processes: Scaling Principles and
Asymptotic Analysis, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.
R. J. LeVeque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge, Cambridge,
2002.
H. W. Liepmann, and A. Roshko, Elements of Gasdynamics, Dover, New York, 2002.
V. L. Liseikin, Grid Generation Methods, Springer, 1999.
J. Lighthill, Waves in Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.
A. J. McConnell, Applications of Tensor Analysis, Dover, New York, 1957.
R. E. Meyer, Introduction to Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, Dover, New York, 1982.
L. M. Milne-Thompson, Theoretical Aerodynamics, 4th edition, Dover, New York, 1958.
L. M. Milne-Thompson, Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 5th edition, Dover, New York, 1996.
P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, Vols. 1 and 2, McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1953.
I. Newton, Principia, Volume I, The Motion of Bodies, University of California Press,
Berkeley, 1934.
J. M. Ottino, The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport, Cambridge,
Cambridge, 1989.
R. L. Panton, Incompressible Flow, 3rd edition, John Wiley, New York, 2005.
D. Pnueli and C. Gutnger, Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge, Cambridge, 1992.
L. Prandtl and O. G. Tietjens, Fundamentals of Hydro and Aeromechanics, Dover, New
York, 1957.
L. Rosenhead, ed., Laminar Boundary Layers, Oxford, Oxford, 1963.
R. H. Sabersky, A. J. Acosta, E. G. Hauptmann, and E. M. Gates, Fluid Flow: A First
Course in Fluid Mechanics, 4th edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey,
1999.
M. Samimy, K. S. Breuer, L. G. Leal, and P. H. Steen, A Gallery of Fluid Motion, Cam-
bridge, Cambridge, 2004.
330
J. A. Schetz, Boundary Layer Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clis, New Jersey, 1993.
H. M. Schey, Div, Grad, Curl, and All That, 2nd Ed., W.W. Norton, London, 1992.
H. Schlichting, K. Gersten, E. Krause, and C. Mayes, Boundary Layer Theory, 8th edition,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.
L. I. Sedov, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, Academic Press, New York,
1959.
L. A. Segel, Mathematics Applied to Continuum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1987.
A. H. Shapiro, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Volume I,
John Wiley, New York, 1953.
A. H. Shapiro, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Volume
II, Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1954.
F. S. Sherman, Viscous Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.
J. Smoller, Shock Waves and Reaction-Diusion Equations, Second Edition, Springer, New
York, 1994.
J. H. Spurk, Fluid Mechanics: Problems and Solutions, Springer, New York, 1997.
G. G. Stokes, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York,
1966.
J. W. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), The Theory of Sound, Vols. 1 and 2, Dover, New York, 1945.
G. I. Taylor, Scientic Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958.
J. C. Tannehill, D. A. Anderson, and R. H. Pletcher, Computational Fluid Mechanics and
Heat Transfer, 2nd edition, Taylor and Francis, New York, 1997.
W. Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Mathematical and Physical Papers, Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge, 1911.
E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, New
York, 1999.
D. J. Tritton, Physical Fluid Dynamics, Second Edition, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1988.
C. A. Truesdell, A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics, Vol. 1, Second Edition,
Academic Press, Boston, 1991.
M. Van Dyke, Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, Parabolic Press, Stanford, CA,
1975.
331
M. Van Dyke, An Album of Fluid Motion, Parabolic Press, Stanford, California, 1982.
W. G. Vincenti and C. H. Kruger, Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics, Wiley, New
York, 1965.
R. von Mises, Theory of Flight, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1945.
R. von Mises, Mathematical Theory of Compressible Flow, Academic Press, New York,
1958.
J. von Neumann, Collected Works, Pergamon, New York, 1961.
S. Whitaker, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1968.
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, third edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.
G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves, John Wiley, New York, 1974.
L. C. Woods, The Thermodynamics of Fluid Systems, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.
C.-S. Yih, Fluid Mechanics, West River Press, East Hampton, Connecticut, 1977.
Y. B. Zeldovich and Y. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrody-
namic Phenomena, Dover, New York, 2002.
R. Kh. Zeytounian, Theory and Applications of Nonviscous Fluid Flows, Springer, Berlin,
2002.
R. Kh. Zeytounian, Theory and Applications of Viscous Fluid Flows, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
M. J. Zucrow and J. D. Homan, Gas Dynamics, Vol. I, John Wiley, New York, 1976.
332

Notes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LECTURE NOTES ON

INTERMEDIATE FLUID MECHANICS

= x Q. In fact, our use of the transpose notation

t = dt, and dividing by d

about P from classical rigid body

must then be normal to that axis, and is easily visualized to represent a

since D and thus Q

conned to any one of the rotated

(b a). As we shrink the size of the material volume to zero,

surface forces = 0. (1.441)

who is oriented to frame A

who is in the rotated system would say, for instance that

, is sketched in Figure 2.1,

to i and j. From the sketch of

= sin i + cos j. (2.10)

, has no dependency on , so the material

to both sides of the equation to get

varies from streamline to streamline.

Figure 2.5: Sketch of an ideal irrotational point vortex.

as r 0. The vorticity vector of this ow is

, then f is conservative, and f =

, where is the ratio of specic heats, and the o subscript

), and the uid

Figure 2.12: Sketch showing a pair of counterrotating vortices of equal strength

in the far eld and f

. We also know that as r that 0,

= f(t). So our nal result is

has a minimum value of 1 at M = 1,

Dt, u = v D to transform to the frame in

lies just before the discontinuity and x

and then invert A/A

ds, so, (3.258)

t) from Eq. (3.308):

Figure 4.1: Polar and Cartesian representation of a complex number z.

Figure 4.2: Streamlines for uniform ow.

= 2U sin . Thus on the surface, we have

residues. Here the

= 0 and has value

= 0 and has maximum magnitude of 1/2 at either

= 1/2. In dimensional terms, the wall shear stress

, which for incompressible

= P/12. Here the uid ows

= P/12. Here the uid ows

= 0, we get for the heat transfer vector

coordinate system to a new

coordinate system. We assume then a general transformation

also has the same

). That is we allow no dependence of

= 0. Moreover, partial derivatives of

become total derivatives,

). It is not always possible to nd a similarity variable

[0, ) maps into

[0, ) maps into y [0, ).

[0, ), which maps into u [0, ). Direct

and u to be functions of special

) = 0), in terms of the similarity variable

= 0. As it appears on both sides of

collapse into two corresponding points in

(0) = 1, no slip, (5.176)

() = 0, initial and far-eld. (5.177)

are given in Figure 5.9. We see

has a value of unity at

= 0 and has nearly relaxed to zero when

= 1. In dimensionless physical space, we see