Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9-11-2006
ARQ Chapters 1-2
We should not believe everything that we see and hear, even if it comes from an
expert. We should think critically about everything we see and hear. Our conclusions
should be a product of critical thinking. Critical thinking means that we are aware of a
set of interrelated critical questions, we have the ability to ask and answer critical
questions at appropriate times and we have the desire to actively use critical questions.
There are two approaches to thinking that can be used when being exposed to new
information. The first approach is the sponge method. In the sponge method we absorb
as much information as possible but we make no value judgment about the information.
The second method is the panning for gold method where we constantly interact with the
material and question it. The panning for gold method is more about thinking critically
and making a judgment about the material than the sponge method.
To pan for gold we need to first find what the authors background and reasoning
are. If we don’t know what the reasoning is then we can’t question their argument
effectively. We need to understand that for many questions there is no ‘right’ answer.
This is especially true for social issues. We must be aware of our own prejudices and be
willing to revise opinions that we have sometimes formed emotional attachments to.
A critical question to ask about something is, “Who cares?” We should not spend
much time critically analyzing things that nobody cares about. For example, we should
spend more time thinking critically about global warming than we spend on deciding
critical thinking is when critical thinking is used as a method for debate in which your
beliefs are protected and opposing beliefs are attacked with the intent to silence dissent.
Weak sense critical thinking is not concerned with truth or virtue. Strong sense critical
thinking requires us to apply the critical thinking questions to everything, even our own
ideas. Strong sense critical thinking is concerned with truth and protecting ourselves
We must identify an authors reasoning before we critically analyze it. The first
critical question that the book examines is, “What are the issue and the conclusion?”
The issue is the question that the author is trying to answer. There are generally
two kinds of issues that an author or speaker will work with. The first are descriptive
issues that raise questions about how we see the world. The second are prescriptive
issues that answer questions about ethics and what should be done.
In order to find the issue sometimes it is helpful to find the conclusion and work
backwards from that point. The conclusion is the message that the author wants you to
accept. We can not think critically about something until we have both the issue and the
conclusion.
Conclusions must be inferred from reasoning. There are many ways to find the
conclusion. Sometimes we can find the conclusion by finding the issue and working
forward from that, there are indicator words that we can scan for, we can look carefully at
the beginning and at the end of the piece since many times conclusions are located there.
Remember that conclusions are not examples. Sometimes the author’s background will