HE PRESCRIPTION 6:25 AM VAKIN YOUNGCHOAY Section 193/30 of the age. If this Code or Other laws not specifically defined.

To the ten-year Section 193/31 of the state claims to call for tax. To the age of ten years. The government claims to be called out. Other debt to enforce the provisions of this nature. Section 193/32 claims incurred by the verdict of the court. The final agreement or compromise. To the age of ten years, regardless of whether claims will be the same age, how much Section 193/33 claims the following to the age of five years. (1) unpaid interest. (2) an amount to be paid back to the capital repayment installments. (3) pay the hire goods. Unless the lease of movable property under Section 193/34 (4) payment of accrued pension annuity is the salary the money raised and cared for others in a manner similar to that of the pay period. (5) claims under Section 193/34 (a) (2) and (5) that is not in force for two years of age. Section 193/34 claims following. To the age of two years. (1) commercial or industrial operators. Craft operators. The art of industrial or artisan Values that call for delivery. Value of work done. Or the governance of others. As well as the money was released. Advance unless it has been made to the business of the debtor party itself. (2) of the agriculture or forestry. I have known the value of. Delivery of which, agricultural or forestry. Only living in the house. The house of its own accounts department. (3) The transportation of passengers or goods or the recipient to send the message call for freight transport, including rental fees amount to be issued to advance. (4) The business hotel or residence. Entrepreneurs in. Food and drink

Or place of business services. The law call it an accommodation facility. Food or drink. Fee or charge for work that has to make the stay or services including money that was issued to advance. (5) lottery vendors. Seakuinrnyb lottery or similar. Call for the lottery sale. Unless it is sold for resale. (6) The business of renting of movable property. Call for rent (7) persons who are not into the type specified in (1), but as a business in the governance of others or the work of a different call for Sinhgrong be entitled to it. Including proceeds from the advance. (8) get employees to use personal. Call for wages or assets. Other employment for the work. As well as the money has run out or the employer advances to recoup the money such that they have to pay in advance. (9) employees that are not permanent employees. Temporary or daily workers as well as the apprentice. Sinhgrong call for wages or otherwise. Including proceeds from the advance. Or call employer recoup the money as That is they have to pay in advance. (10) the apprentice teacher. Call for the coach and other expenses. As agreed. Including proceeds from the advance. (11) school or hospital owners call it the tradition of learning and other fees or medical expenses. And other charges, including money that was issued to advance. (12) for care recipients to call for the care or training for work that. Including proceeds from the advance. (13) the recipient party or training animals. Call for the work to make. Including proceeds from the advance. (14) teachers or lecturers. Call for tuition (15) of the medical profession of dental nursing, midwifery the treatment of animal diseases or other branch of laws and call for the work that makes money, including that set out to advance. (16) a lawyer or the legal profession, including expert witnesses. Call for the work to make. And advance funds issued to a party or a night out which funds such that they have to pay in advance. (17) professional engineering, architecture, the auditor or other independent professionals. Call for the work that makes money, including that set out to advance. Or the employer to undertake such work. Call for the return of such funds that they have to pay in advance.

Section 193/35 under Section 193/27 claims that Caused by the condition that the debtor has liability in writing or by evidence of insurance under Section 193/28, paragraph two to the age of two years from the date of receipt of state or liability insurance. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8051/2551. The plaintiff the money deposited in savings accounts to pay the defendant's commission credit and debt after the agreement expired, then the plaintiff's own actions. Yes, accounts for the liability to the creditor by paying the creditors of certain debt. Case shall not be interrupted to allow the prescription. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) the plaintiff is the banks business operators to get the tasks that call for money to advance. The plaintiff's claim of 2 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7), the plaintiff sued to bring the case on October 25, 2544 expiration of 2 years from the date on which the plaintiff may enforce the claims of the plaintiff. Terminate the plaintiff has sued. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5384/2551. Income from credit card debt, whether the purchase of goods and services. Or withdraw cash from debt. Are a debt arising from the use of credit cards together. Is a 2-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) may not enforce the separation of different age. Of the state debt repayment to be made part of the interrupted life into it. The defendant must be made or agreed to do so the plaintiff Less Thon account of the defendant to pay credit card debt, which use Netting rights. And without an agreed contract as follows: Although the defendant did not dispute against the defendant shall be deemed consent to such action by the plaintiff was not If the defendant does not consider partial payment of the liability which will result in the prescription to be interrupted. Plaintiff's claims, so terminate the. Judgement of the Supreme Court 3101/2551. On the hearing. District Court to inquire into facts from the plaintiffs

testimony about the use of credit cards and. Credit card debt of the defendant. Attorneys for the defendant stated the facts. And that the invoice was sent to plaintiff's claim as fact. Not impressed, and examine District Court decision that enough cases now ceased taking evidence on the plaintiff. Then judge the case based on the fact that the. Not considered that a preliminary decision in accordance with legal problems. Code of Civil Procedure Section 24, the District Court order abstaining from hearing the plaintiff had a pending order. Plaintiff's business bank and business credit card types are available. Nature of business, job offers convenience to members on all purchases. And services. The members of the cash advance with credit card As part of its services facilitate it. The plaintiff is the operator for the tasks to members of the plaintiff has paid money to the creditors of its members instead of members before the good. Members to withdraw cash or pre-charged members later, it is considered that the money that the plaintiff was called out to advance. Filing of a plaintiff's advances, so the two-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7). Judgement of the Supreme Court 2625/2551. The plaintiff provides rental and use of radio equipment by the lessee must pay rental fees of radio communication and consideration for the use of radio frequency Held that the plaintiff is a business of providing rental of movable property. Is a 2-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (6) and compensation from the plaintiff charged the defendant with characteristics similar to the rent. When the plaintiff filed a compensation over the two years from the date on which the plaintiff claims the defendant to pay debts. Then terminate the. When compensation claims, which terminate the debt President. Consideration for the frequency increase, the penalty is a debt and equipment Shall also terminate the Section 193/26. Judgement of the Supreme Court 2456/2551. The plaintiff is a commercial bank. Defendant is the plaintiff's customers give credit card type bound by the terms of the cardholder. The defendant used credit cards to withdraw cash advances from automatic deposit withdrawals. Other financial

institutions. The plaintiff must pay defendant previously represented the defendant charged in the future. Is a business service facilities to the members. The plaintiff called membership fee. Is the case, the plaintiff, a business in the work of the various Call for advance payment issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) is not a special case of contract law without any provisions, particularly on the subject. Age, so age of 2 years. Accused credit card last time on December 6, 2535 the plaintiff informed the defendants to pay debts arising from the use of credit cards within 2 January 2536, but the defendant did not pay on schedule. Considered the defendant went to the default The plaintiff would force claim their from the date of January 3, 2536 onwards maturity and on January 3, 2536 the plaintiff the amount of 4,326.42 U.S. defendants to pay certain indebtedness on March 3, 2543 is bringing. Deposits from other accounts by the plaintiff and the defendant had ever agreed to pay less. Obligation by the defendant is not an accomplice with the plaintiff's action unilaterally. Not considered an admission that the defendant's liability. In addition, an action that occurred after the debt and then terminate. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 24, 2547 at the expiration of 2 years to expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 2454/2551. Plaintiff's business provides repair services. The plaintiff is a trader. The defendant is a business insurance. The plaintiff was hired to repair the insured vehicle insurance with the defendant. Business of the defendant. The plaintiff's call for wage insurance, repair your car insured with the defendant. Thus call for wage or cost of work to be done to the business of the defendant. The debtor. With the exception case must not be in the age of 2 years by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) the plaintiff's claims are valid under Section 193/33 of 5 years (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 3503/2551. The defendant hired the plaintiff to the defendant for the construction of houses will be sold as a defendant if the plaintiff's employment made to the defendant. The plaintiff is a trader call for

the work to be done. Since the construction of the plaintiff to the defendant. Defendant acts in order to sell the land development project of the objectives of the defendant. The plaintiff's action has made it to the business of the defendants, the debtor Therefore the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1). Judgement of the Supreme Court 2211/2551. The plaintiff sued the defendant agreed that plaintiff's employment contract design, decoration and advertising projects and Oasis complex vocalization plasma Hinkle of the defendant. Defendant to the plaintiff of the fact that the employer, so the implementation of the agreement, although the plaintiff's compliance with the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. But it is the case, the plaintiff has done to the business of the defendant. Therefore the 5year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1). Judgement of the Supreme Court 1735/2551. Elevator which is installed at the condominium. Are for the mutual benefit of co-owner is treated as common property. Collection costs arising from maintenance elevator must be as prescribed in Condominium Act BE 2522, Section 18 paragraph two, which is required to pay on a monthly basis. Costs of the defendant failed to pay money it is outstanding. This is an age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (4), and claims to be considered this type of Civil and assigned to a particular prescription. It can not lead the Civil and Commercial Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 1343/2551. If a trader or a call for industry to deliver the value of which is governed by the age of 2 years with the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) states, except in the case of non-enforcement of the statute of that. that. Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. This is an exception by law to consider the important business of the debtor is a party. In any case be an exception to it or not. It need not consider whether it has been made

for the benefit of creditors, with or without parties. Defendant to a plaintiff's purchase of cement from the sale or the concrete mix is available to the public. Would hold that it has been made to the business of the defendants at first, the debtor itself. Which is to be the case with exceptions as provided in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) the plaintiff's claims are not governed by age, 2 years and 5 years of age but under Section 193/33 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 134/2551. Loan agreement is an agreement that Defendant committed to the principal and the interest back to the plaintiff. By installments a month months 5,000 Baht as prosecution claims the defendant to pay the interest with principal under loan agreements are considered to be a call for interest with principal to finance the cost back as installments which have an age limit of the five-year According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 (2) (Section 166 originally), not the absence of legal provisions which require 10 years of age, under Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5522/2550. The plaintiff sued the business trade, automotive parts, call for goods to be delivered to the defendant. Purchases from the plaintiff by the defendant in order to repair the insured vehicle to the defendant, including those who are insured in case of disputes with the insured and the defendant is at fault. Which claims the use of life insurance business, which is within the objectives of the defendant so that defendant purchase auto parts from the plaintiff. Thus made to the business of the defendants themselves. Therefore the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1). Judgement of the Supreme Court 7693/2550. Counting period of the first day of the period combined with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 3, paragraph two plaintiffs to bring a lawsuit on October 25, 2543 which is the last day of the age of 2 years from the date of October 25, 2541 which 1 defendant received the goods the plaintiff claims the defendant, a first claim all

terminate

the

plaintiff

has

not.

Judgement of the Supreme Court 4728/2550. The plaintiff, a trader calls out the value of work done and expenses that the plaintiff was released to the advance represented the defendant for carrying goods to send to the defendant's customers located in foreign countries, which calls for a fee. were made to the business of the defendants, the debtor itself. Exceptions are in accordance with the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) with an age limit of two years. But the age of five years under Section 193/33 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 3329/2550. The plaintiff's sales of industrial machinery. Goldsmith tool for the defendant. When the defendant fails to pay the price. And the plaintiff sued the defendant to settle claims in the case where the plaintiff, a merchant or industry call for the value of the delivered under Section 193/34 (a). Judgement of the Supreme Court 2316/2550. Book the liability of the defendant, a written certification that the defendant, a plaintiff is a debt repayment agreement on the debt on a monthly basis with the second defendant as the guarantor. Considered to be both the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to pay the debt by installments How is the periodic capital return. Claims of the plaintiff has an age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 (2) when the two defendants failed to pay debts to the plaintiff from the first period. The plaintiff claims could force the defendant to two to each installment payment when due from the two defendants to pay a debt that period. Debt claims on the expiration of any period of 5 years of age back up from the day it filed a false sense of limitation Books do not have the liability agreement. If two defendants defaulted on any installment period is considered in default in whole or in total debt is due to make a plaintiff claims that the two defendants to pay back the entire debt immediately. Message specified in the letter that the state debt. If you default on any installment period is agreed to sue enforcement immediately. Means

that the plaintiff's claims would happen if the two defendants defaulted in that period, only after the period is not due to the plaintiff is not entitled to call out the two defendants. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8021/2549. Court of First Instance sentenced the two defendants to pay interest to the plaintiff under the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 391 paragraph two, the interest it has, it must replace the damaged one to the plaintiff's recovery as the former has not accrued interest, transmit or accrued interest. the age of 5 years to pay under Section 193/33. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8419/2550. Public of land disputes is for people to share. Who have no ownership or possessory right to use lean against the state and did not revoke the decree is also a public interest for people to share. But those who occupy land in dispute shall be entitled to better than others. The plaintiff is a land dispute. Although the plaintiff does not have ownership or possessory right because it is the public. But the plaintiff in a land dispute shall be entitled to better Buy only the defendant's house to the shareholders of the plaintiff not allow the demolition of such houses from the land dispute is the plaintiff's right to dispute. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the authority to demolish the house from a land dispute. The plaintiff is a land dispute, which is for people to share public of the plaintiff shall be entitled to better than the defendant and the defendant is not taking possession from the plaintiff. Defendant has raised the age of 1 year from the taking of possession. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1375 paragraph two, as a defense to the plaintiff that the plaintiff sued not terminate the search. Judgement of the Supreme Court 7552/2550. Thor Driving in the employ of the plaintiff's employer, who was Thor's car crash Insured to the Company that. Have been damaged after Thor The plaintiff claims to know of the death sentence the Supreme Court sentenced the plaintiff to pay to a Bank And Wor. And the

plaintiff has already paid. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation back from Thor According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 426 has recently occurred on the plaintiff's payment. Right to claim restitution to employees under Section 426 of the old law, no otherwise then aged under Section 193/30 of 10 years of age will be under Section 1754, paragraph four, the age of the claims of creditors. You heritagebe applied to the defendant in the indictment, the three of Thor The Dharma heir Liability is not when the plaintiff sued the defendant to litigation in three not out 10 years from the date the plaintiff has the right to call out to Thor (Payment on the plaintiff) the plaintiff's action does not terminate the. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6437/2550. Plaintiffs describe action by clear and that the defendant, a child placental penetration into taking farm land disputes the plaintiff's itinerary of the estimated end action, with an area of about 4 acres, the map annexed to sue is part of the complaint and identify the claim. that the defendant, an invasion that clearly enough that a defendant understands the charges and his defense. The plaintiff to sue in this section is not ambiguous. The plaintiff sued for share ownership in the property by the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1363, which the lawsuit is valid, such as Section 1363 of the second paragraph of that ownership is a legal act will not share ownership has a term of not more than ten years. Non-prescription The plaintiff's case does not terminate the. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6335/2550. Retention of the defendant deducted from the wages to be paid to the plaintiff in each period is the plaintiff and the defendant as a party wishes to use as collateral damage that may arise from the construction. Therefore not as unpaid wages, the plaintiff must pay claims within two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) claims in this case, no statute of the law specifically. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6109/2550. Compromise agreement Article 4 requires that if a defendant

defaulted on any installment period is one month or any month. All shall be deemed in default shall allow the plaintiff immediately. When a defendant does not pay attorney's fees to the plaintiff Charge the compromise agreement within Article 2 on June 15, 2538 would hold that a defendant failed to pay operating debts to the plaintiff shall be allowed under the Supreme Court by then. The plaintiff has the right to force the case for the accused to an immediate agreement to compromise Clause 4, so claims to enforce payment of the plaintiff under the Supreme Court as allowed above, which has an age limit of 10 years to start from the date of June 16, 2538. not reset on July 16, 2538 which is the day following the date the defendant first failed to pay debt principal and interest to the plaintiff the first period under a compromise item a plaintiff the debt under the Supreme Court as allowed such prosecution on. July 14, 2548 expiration of 10 years and then expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6024/2550. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the old claims, but the data breach occurred on the first 2 cases the age of one year from the date of knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. The second case, the age of ten years from the date of the violation. Which if any of these claims for damages, it is considered that terminate the. Provisions such that the age of ten years from the date of the violation of the date of the violation shall have occurred since the date of the act or omission of acts which cause more damage. The results of a violation to occur when Another day would be a violation to the date of effect of a violation occurs is different. Describe this case the plaintiff sued in June 2522 when, during the month August 2523 the two defendants by the defendant intentionally or about 2 light-headed Surveying the land. Certificate (pmSat 3 g).The plaintiff's wrongful acts and regulations of the government scheme. Is a violation of the plaintiff causes the plaintiff has been damaged following data breach would occur at the latest on August 31, 2523 plaintiff filed on July 7, 2542, which Prescription ten years from the date of the abuse. Shall terminate the plaintiff's case. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4848/2550.

Contract is a contract that made the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (16), the plaintiff and the defendant does not agree that the deadline to pay wages. Have to pay that debt is considered to determine when the defendant was authorized to work then. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 602, paragraph one of the accused intended to plaintiff in civil court proceedings only. When the plaintiff to prosecute the defendant and the Supreme Court of First Instance held that the plaintiff Delivered and the defendant was authorized to work under that contract then. Plaintiff's right to call for wage would happen as soon as the Supreme Court of First Instance. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4728/2550. The plaintiff, a trader calls out the value of work done and expenses that the plaintiff was. Advance replacement for the defendant to transport goods to send to the defendant's customers located in foreign countries to which the call has been made to the business of the defendants, which are Debtor itself. Exceptions are in accordance with the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) that the age of two years. But the age of five years under Section 193/33 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 5142/2550. When officers of the plaintiff was to investigate the facts to determine the civil liability and that the two defendants are liable for civil and report the facts to know the hierarchical superiors, and on January 8, 2544 Dec Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice. Has signed a letter to the defendant to call the two together to compensate the plaintiff. Which says clearly that the defendant, one who acts in violation of the plaintiff by the defendant 2 is a title in the car cause the accident abuse, representing damages of 31,373.75 baht and the two defendants jointly liable for payment as the plaintiff. It can be the case that the Bank Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice that are currently in a position representation and intent, which is the intention of the plaintiff. Be aware of abuse and know who is should be the compensation is two

defendants from the date of January 8, 2544, so when plaintiffs bring this case to sue the two defendants on January 6, 2546, which period more than 1 year lawsuit plaintiff. the defendant to terminate the second is the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one Judgement of the Supreme Court 5140/2550. S. Director authorized to sign and seal the defendant's actions on behalf of the defendant, even Sat The defendant did not seal. But the book has been a liability of the defendant at the top of the page of the circumstances of S. Considers S. Agent of the defendant as the S. A letter to the state debt to the plaintiff. Constitute acts of the defendant. Get the book now contains a condition that the debt ...Ask that you reduce the price down to some more appropriate. Apply for a waiver with payment devices such as next month, so any act which no doubt shows that as the default. Accept the claim. Recognize the liability which the statute of interrupted down The new age begins from the date of this letter to sue the state debt to no more than two years on claims of the plaintiff does not expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4848/2550. The plaintiff hired the defendant promised that all three of which make a contract claim under a contract of the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (16) starting from the age, the demand for All three defendants to pay debts that the Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 provided that "Age and the beginning from the time that may force claims to be so ...."And Article 602, paragraph one provided that "One that shall be used to rong wage authorized to do, so when the facts did not appear that the plaintiff and the defendant has agreed to three times the wages paid to that. It must be assumed that the debt paid. It must be considered debt pay that is due when the defendant and a third award of the work done and then under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 602, paragraph one of the delivery and the delivery of work that made it appear to the fact that after the Court Chiang Mai Judgement and the defendant has satisfied all three, and do not wish to prosecute next Show that all three defendants to the plaintiff intends to prosecute in civil court only. When the plaintiff, an attorney to prosecute the three defendants in the Court of First

Instance, which is the Mai Mai and the Supreme Court on June 30, 2545 to consider the plaintiff and the defendant has delivered the third award of the contract work that already Plaintiff's right to call for wage would happen as soon as the Supreme Court in Chiang Mai. Find tips on the best case is that the plaintiff did not appeal. Part of the plaintiff filed an answer that I believe that the plaintiff made arbitrarily The plaintiff is looking for might have set up a claim that was not When the plaintiff sued the defendant bring the case to the three on May 4, 2548 at which time more than 2 years from the date of the Supreme Court of First Instance. Terminate the plaintiff has sued. Judgement of the Supreme Court 755/2550. The plaintiff is a legal entity by the Department in the government. There shall be a representative Violation of the Age of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one must begin from the date the Director General of the representative plaintiff knew of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Pm Mr. Chang is a Highway, which is the only official of the Department of plaintiff's only Not directly representative of the plaintiff, even pm Be aware of abuse and know who will should require compensation since 2539, but the Chief represented the plaintiff know the story on September 26, 2546 it held that the plaintiff knew of abuse and know who is should be the claim date. on September 26, 2546 from the date of March 12, 2547, the date has not filed the expiration of 1 year's case does not terminate the plaintiff. Judgement of the Supreme Court 389/2550. The plaintiff informed credit union defendants have agreed to the plaintiff from being a member of the defendant from the date of January 11, 2541 show that the plaintiff was aware of it should be compensation in the non-fall at the date of receiving written notice from the defendant. is the day that the plaintiff should be aware of the compensation. Because the plaintiff is injured to bring the case to court itself. No need waiting to hear instructions from the defendant. Although plaintiff may have just received notification of the defendants to know the resolution on January 21, 2541, it had no

effect on the age, just starting. When plaintiffs bring the case to sue more than one year from the knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Then terminate the under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one Judgement of the Supreme Court 386/2550. 2 The plaintiff sued the defendant as the defendant violated an employer as a defendant in two of the employer violated the employment. And the three defendants jointly liable as a recipient Insurance trig indemnity liability of the defendant and the defendant a 2, 3, is different. For the defendants 1 and 2, age of 1 year from the date the victim knew of abuse and know who will should require compensation under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the defendant to 3 age of 2 years from the date of casualty, according Article 882, paragraph one at the age of the lawsuit accused the first of two defendants to three can be separated from each other under section 295 given age as you or a penalty only to the debtor who is accused of three can not be lifted prescription Section 448, paragraph one of the battle. Judgement of the Supreme Court 321/2550. Claims data in which the offense punishable under the Penal Code. Which the criminal statute of longer under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph two, meaning only the claims of male perpetrators or participants in the offense in particular. Does not mean others are not involved in the offense with Claim 2, which took the defendant to an employer. It requires a prescription under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one, when the accused 2 to the fight that the reason this case occurred on February 20, 2542, but the plaintiff to sue for damages in case of violation on April 22, 2545 after the birth. Why waste for 3 years then terminate the plaintiff sued. Would express to terminate the cause of that is understandable. Violation from the date of the accident until the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit to terminate the first year and then to the defendant's words are like the two with the Code of Civil Procedure Section 177, paragraph two cases for two defendants, so the issue of prescription

Judgement of the Supreme Court 307/2550. Actions to be offense to Act offenses arising from the use of check BB 2534, Section 4 shall be issued checks to pay off debt and forced to exist under the law. Which is an element of the offense. Not only details that can attest to the floor. Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant, but only that the check for payment under the contract a copy of liability and liability for the end of action. Thus describe the lack of action component fault Because of the liability does not cause a new debt. Just cause, age, interrupted only down. Plaintiff's complaint is not legitimate. Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 204/2550. Because of the state debt, which interrupted the prescription to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) if the debtor must be made to creditors. The plaintiff, a creditor to deduct a credit to the defendant, a debtor is not in accordance with the provisions section such conditions. The first part of the defendant to return plaintiff's part, it is used as the right to party. Not show that the defendant admitted that a plaintiff is a debt unpaid. Not considered an admission that the plaintiff's liability as well. Age does not make a seamless stop. Judgement of the Supreme Court 101/2550. Two defendants made compromise agreement with the bank and the court sentenced the give notice that an agreed settlement principal and interest within six months from the date of the compromise agreement clause 2 agreed to pay the court did not order back and attorneys' fees 5,000 within March 9, 2538 and Article 3, if the defendant failed to pay debts or fails to comply with any of the contract shall be deemed in default and allow all to immediate execution. When the defendant did not have to pay obligations under clause 2, within days of March 9, 2538 shall be deemed in default and the bank can force the case immediately under Article 3, so old and have to start from the date of March 10, 2538, not counting the date of 9. August 2538 after six months from the date of the compromise agreement because the defendant fails to pay debt principal and interest as a plaintiff's contracts, the transferee bank

claims on the prosecution on May 9, 2548 more than 10 years and then expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 17/2550. 1 to 3, the defendant entered into the guarantee of S. By allowing liability associated with S. The fourth defendant as the husband of the defendant to three to allow the defendant to 3 to guarantee agreement with the defendant guilty and accept the 3 S. The plaintiff employee was the plaintiff's misappropriation of funds. And a letter to the liability that the plaintiff will pay the first installment on August 5, 2537 as the liability of S. Is liable under an employment agreement which has no law on age, specifically has defined 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 period begins from the date of the accident fraudulent misappropriation on January 14, 2536, but when SatA letter to the liability to the plaintiff for repayment refunded to the plaintiff the first installment of 200,000 baht on August 5, 2537 of the state debt that has to age, interrupted it with the time pass away before it does not count in the age of the P.WedWed Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15 and age, that stumble into this would have stopped a penalty for the four defendants who are guaranteed by the Civil and Commercial Code Section 692 of the state case for products liability under Section 193/35 of 2 years of age, which later appeared on Sat No first payment to the plaintiff on August 5, 2537 as the liability to. Because the prescription is interrupted to terminate on such date. And one begins from the date of August 6, 2537 onwards, the plaintiff filed the case on April 9, 2537 on the date of August 6, 2537, a day after the start of a new age not exceeding 10 years can not terminate the plaintiff's case. Judgement of the Supreme Court 7650/2549. Defendant to purchase a ready-mixed concrete from the plaintiff to the defendant to sell to customers at a profit also fried one of the defendants, which the business itself, which he asked for an exception under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (1) so that. The plaintiff filed a ready-mix concrete price payable by a defendant that there was an age of 5 years under Section 193/33 (5).

Judgement of the Supreme Court 3314/2549. Although the plaintiff is a trader's call for the delivery of which has a 2 year old under Section 193/34 (a) matter, but at the end of this section, provided the case is an exception that is not in the age of 2. that year unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. The need to consider the affairs of the debtor that kind of a business case. The two defendants buying fuel from the plaintiff to the buses. The two defendants operate offshore transport of passengers and cargo. Would hold that the two defendants from the plaintiff to buy fuel in the affairs of the two defendants. Which is to be the case with the exception Not in the age of 2 years by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1), but the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 2261/2549. Fertilizer trade between the plaintiff and the defendant had an agreement that if a defendant does not pay the full amount of fertilizers on contract Allow the defendant to the plaintiff by a hire purchase interest rate of 9 percent per year if paid within 12 months is considered breach of contract default interest in excess of 12 months at a rate of 12 percent per annum until full payment is made. When the plaintiff has the right to demand interest from a defendant under the agreement, and that a defendant has not paid it is sent or unpaid accrued interest under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 (a) the age of 5 years, not 10. year The Supreme Court 9009 9014/2549. The plaintiff sued the six lectures. Dismissal of the plaintiff and the defendant by the plaintiff's six-six, which are not offenders dismissal unfair to force defendants to pay damages for the dismissal unfair not to sue the defendant to pay wages or damages arising from the contract. is not paid or otherwise Sinhgrong with an age of 2 years, based on Civil and Commercial Code Section 193/34 is the case, but a lawsuit for damages arising from unfair dismissal in accordance with Act on Establishment of Labour Court and Labour Court Procedure BE 2522, Section 49, which has no law specifically to their

age. Has an age limit of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4644/2549. Hire-purchase agreement requires that the lease termination in the event of a failed hire. Pay the lease period and when any one period of the hire car to take possession of the lease if not sold enough to pay the purchase price of the lease must still pay any agreement. Costs and other damages that occur after deducting all of the lease that the lease was paid. The lease agreement will compensate the lack of money to an owner The agreement is an agreement for damages based on contract hire. The legal action against those not on a call the outstanding purchase. And not a case where the business of renting out a lease of movable property. Do not fall into the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (6) and is not a case where the lessor sued the lessee about the lease on the age of 6 months when there is no statute of the law. especially There was an age of 10 years under Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8696/2549. The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages to the plaintiff would occupy a taxi. The plaintiff lessor to lack of interest that should be taken from the leased property to rent out the grounds for termination from the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. Despite a 400 baht per day, the same rate as the rent. But it is a legal action against the lack of benefit from the use of a rental property, not to sue unpaid. This case, the Civil and Commercial Code does not specifically prescribe prescription. Has an age limit of ten years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8694/2549. Enforcement Officers announced the property by public auction to the terms of the price and terms that Buyer Sub to pay the rest within 15 days from the date of purchase onwards the 15 days given to buyers of Property to the remaining funds to pay under the contract that is the time set for repayment Non-prescription, as required by law that the parties will agree to abstain or not to extend or shorten according to the provisions of the Civil and Commercial

Code, Section 193/11 of the property and the buyers Enforcement Officersagreed extension of time deposit the rest. Another is to find a violation of the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 510 and 515 do not, there is no legal reason that the court may issue an order to revoke the order and auction of Enforcement Officers. This case. Like the court to order raised by the petition of the defendant need not investigate The Supreme Court 8242 8246/2549. 1 to 3, the plaintiff sued a bonus under an employment agreement which, by the Labour Protection Act WedSince 2541, Section 5 defined the term "wages" means money that employers and employees agreed to pay as compensation for working under contract for a period of normal operation ... And the word "overtime" means money paid by the employer to an employee in return for working overtime on a weekday. Although overtime is not paid as defined above. It is not money that employers pay to employees in return for normal functioning of the working day. However, it is money that employers pay compensation for work outside normal time. Commitments which the employer must pay to the employee under an employment agreement. Sinhgrong considered by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 575 Wage overtime is one under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (9), the age of 2 years of litigation. Judgement of the Supreme Court 7875/2549. The purpose of the plaintiff Housing Supplies business machine business. Furniture, electrical equipment, including spare parts and accessories of such goods. The plaintiff sold the furniture to equipment categories that a defendant has a business purpose or operation of the plaintiff that the defendant is a business hotel. The defendant to a machine shop type of furniture from the plaintiff is to be used in the business of the defendant at a hotel which is the business of the defendant went to an exception under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) Therefore, the plaintiff take legal action cost products Furniture owed by a defendant, there was an age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5).

Judgement of the Supreme Court 7611/2549. The plaintiff filed a lack of benefit from the use of a rental car after the lease break. The lease does not take legal action. The plaintiff sued in the lack of benefit from the use of car hire age of 10 years of age, 2 years, not as a second petition, so the defendant claims the lack of utilization of a car lease will not terminate the plaintiff. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6785/2549. According to the Civil and Commercial Code and Compensation Act, tax on export production in the Kingdom. Age is not provided in the case of claims under this specifically. Plaintiff's claims against two defendants who are 10 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the plaintiff's claim does not terminate the recall should not have luck. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5996/2549. Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 states that "the age to start from the time the claim may be forced on. If it claims to abstain to act in any way. To start from the time of the first violation of the act "when listening to the fact that the Central Labour Court by the defendant, a second defendant had agreed verbally with the plaintiff that If the plaintiff can be detected fraud and corruption proceeds returned to the defendant that a plaintiff may receive special consideration. When it appears that the plaintiff has detected fraud and to cause the defendant to a lawsuit Thai Bank of Commerce Limited (Thailand) and Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited () even on 31 March 2546 the defendant, a recovery of 9,403,007.63 Baht conditions. verbal agreement may force the defendant claims that a special compensation payment from the under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 find products from the date of October 15, 2544 which is on the plaintiff resigned from being an employee. of a defendant when the plaintiff is not a regular employee filed a special fee per cent of the work done. Thus demanding compensation for working under an employment agreement with an agreed work done in the normal working hours of the workday, which pay Is the claim that the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (9), the plaintiff filed an action in the Central Labour

Court on May 6, 2547 is not the expiration of 2 years from the date of March 31. 2546, which date shall be entitled to claim. Does not terminate the plaintiff's case. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5994/2549. The plaintiff sued the defendant, the employer, the employee to pay debts arising from the defendant guilty of the employment agreement by the plaintiff to withdraw the product and then do not return the books, the liability to the plaintiff. Is the case, the plaintiff sued the defendant to liability under the employment agreement. Not to sue the defendant liable under the liability book. But the defendant claimed that a letter has been a liability for evidence that the defendant was guilty of an employment agreement with the only Such debt does not have the old law specifically so the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5201/2549. The defendant hired someone building a building. In this regard, a defendant ordered plaintiff's employment from the plaintiff and zinc roof building If it falls into force of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) at the end of that Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. So the old claims of the plaintiff is a period of 5 years from the time payment is due on the defaulted defendant to a lawsuit until the expiration of 5 years not to sue does not terminate the plaintiff. The plaintiff handed over the roof to install a defendant after that when it rains the roof leaks and turn off when the wind hit. , Which defects, which should not be found, while on authorized. The plaintiff is a defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the first defendant had paid the The right to withhold only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff has not completed repairs to a defendant so love to hire them to withhold goods. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5033/2549. Labour Protection Act, BE 2541, Section 125, paragraph one provided that "When the Labor Inspector can issue an order under section 124 if the employer, employee or The Dharma heir of the employee who has died are not satisfied that order to bring the case to court within

30 days from the date of the order," which is to set up. bring the case to court under the provisions of these is scheduled to bring a lawsuit. Age is not the right to claim any right to bring the case to the court in accordance with Act on Establishment of Labour Court and Labour Court Procedure BE 2522, Section 8 (4) is subject to Section 26 of the Act which provided that "Period, as defined in this Act or by the Labour Court has set. Labour Court has the power to shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice ", so the time for filing such cases can shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4998/2549. The lawsuit asked to revoke acts of mortgage redemption. Mortgage and sale of the land back to the plaintiff is the owner of the property monitoring and regain their property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1336, there is no set prescription. The fourth defendant to purchase the land leave the disputed amount to 2,500,000 baht already sees that The only power of attorney signed by the plaintiff which has no authority to make that message and not given anything to fill in the proxy The plaintiff did not agree with. Is caused by gross negligence of the defendant to four naive own fraud of the defendant that a plaintiff is not the result of manipulation or allow a defendant accused of manipulation itself as a representative of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not responsible for the defendant to four under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 821, 822, so the defendant to one has no right to the land of the plaintiff to register sale of the defendant to four acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant, 4 do not like and do not bind plaintiff The plaintiff shall be entitled to recoup the tracking of their assets from people who have no right to take it. The plaintiff then sued for the revocation of acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant was 4. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4997/2549. The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly fraud plaintiffs to purchase leave the land of the defendant to a cause plaintiff's trust and lost money to the two defendants to 1,500,000 Baht and a request forcing the two defendants together the money to the

plaintiff. U.S. 1,500,000 was deposited the purchase price of the land granted to the plaintiff both to the defendant. Non-violation complaint in the age of one year only. But with the right track out of the plaintiff's property back from two defendants who have no right to rely on the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1336 by which time the property owner does not exercise this The interest of such money damages, which is considered the plaintiff's motion for a civil action relating to the criminal offense of fraud. The plaintiff in the prosecution of criminal cases is not absolute. Does not terminate the according How Denis Code of Criminal Section 51 paragraph two. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4857/2549. Car repair contract that the plaintiff, the defendant made a contract of 2 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1). The plaintiff delivered the car to anyone who is ready to fix the car then. The plaintiff may enforce their rights in a claim to the defendant to pay Sinhgrong counted from the date of delivery of each vehicle, which led to the expense. The defendant used the money to pay debts for some of the plaintiff. Thus the liability to the plaintiff. Interrupted to make the old and the new age begins from that date. According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15. Plaintiff's debt to 41 items, the total amount of 402,197 baht, which the plaintiff can enforce their rights before the date of May 8, 2541 filed on 19 June 2543, more than two years ago sued the plaintiff in this section and so terminate. The more debt the repairs to 11 of 47,500 baht appears that on May 8, 2543, the date the defendant to pay some debts. Debt repairs and 11 do not terminate the list. Prescription for such debt must begin recount And when calculated up to no more than two years to sue the plaintiff in 11 cases this is not terminate the. Of the state debt which will cause the prescription will be interrupted to terminate the action before the debt. When the repairs of debt 402,197 to terminate the U.S. since before the May 8, 2541 partial settlement of the defendant on such date, there is no interruption of the prescription is stopped.

Judgement of the Supreme Court 4787/2549. Plaintiff to travel from Bangkok to Udon Thani on July 25, 2541 at which the defendant should be delivered to the plaintiff lost luggage. Prescription shall begin from that date. Although the plaintiff may bring a lawsuit on August 9, 2542, which set out a year ago, but on November 13, 2541 defendant sent a letter to the plaintiff agrees to compensate it for damages amounting to U.S. $ 400, although not full amount the plaintiff claims. It is a book for state debt. The result was a prescription interrupted by the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) When the plaintiff to the lawsuit filed on August 9, 2542 and will not expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4786/2549. The prosecution asked the child is a child the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1556, paragraph three states that if the adult child must bring a lawsuit within one year from the date of legal age. Appears as a birth certificate and a copy of that registration. The singer was born on May 24, 2512 petitioner filed this lawsuit on October 20, 2546 when the petitioner has 34 years of age, thus applying after the expiration of one year from the date of legal age. Cases of so terminate the petitioner. Although petitioner claimed that the dead will not deny that petitioner was not a child is no dispute about the rights or duties under the law, and when they die, then death. Petitioner to obtain family allowance Council members But officials are not committed to. Claim that there is no evidence that the petitioner is a legitimate child of the deceased. Is a hindrance to the recent dispute the right of the petitioner. Petitioner must be exercised by the Court for an order that the petitioner is the legitimate child of the deceased in accordance with Examine how the Code of Civil Procedure at Section 55, but any exercise of the court of the petitioner is also required under the provisions of these ages with Petitioner claimed that the petitioner would have just been the right argument. Not terminate the case for no. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4206/2549. Act on the Carriage of Goods by Sea BE 2534, Section 46 applies only if the sender or the consignee sued the carrier's liability for damages for the loss. Damage or delay in delivery of the contract of carriage

by carriage of goods by sea only. The plaintiff sued the defendant hired the plaintiff's delivery to the customer of the plaintiff in Saudi Arabia. The defendant represented the plaintiff. The defendant liable because of shipping documents to the end customer agreement delayed The customer acceptance only Plaintiff claimed that the defendant is a marine transportation and the defendant's liability for loss reason. Damage or delay in delivery of goods during the carriage of goods in the custody of the accused under Section 39 of the WedThB.The Carriage of Goods by Sea WedSince 2534 the provisions of Section 46 shall not apply to. However, because the Act does not prescribe on prescription in this case. Therefore subject to the provisions on the liability of the agency under the Civil and Commercial Code shall apply. But the Civil and Commercial Code Book 1, Title 6 Chapter 2 that with age, it has not provided their age in this particular case and as such. Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 know when the plaintiff on December 8, 2544 that the defendants guilty Agreement customers can not pick up soon cause damage. Determines that such date is the day that the plaintiff may enforce the right to claim damages from the defendants. And after the date the plaintiff to sue within 10 years and do not expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 3648/2549. Tort Liability Act Officer BE 2539, Section 5 is the state agency is liable to victims of abuse in the results of their actions, officials in the performance. The injured party may sue the government directly. But officials would not sue. The case is the plaintiff, a police department to take recourse to sue the two defendants, a police official. Because the two defendants made the duty of the representatives of the plaintiff, a corporate cause damage to others. And the plaintiff is liable to pay compensation for such damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 76, paragraph one, the plaintiff has the power to sue And the age of 10 years. Judgement of the Supreme Court 3648/2549. The Supreme Court has ruled that two defendants, the officers of the plaintiff and the plaintiff under the common duck back to P. If the night is not the price instead. The plaintiff has the money to put to

the Court Por payment On July 18, 2538 The Grad Be paid to the defendant and the plaintiff has sued the two jointly liable for the payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to take recourse to claims filed before the two defendants. Tort Liability Act's staff. Into force on November 15, 2539, age, the plaintiff claims to remove the two defendants. Are not subject. D Act, Dee said. But is subject to the Civil and Commercial Code, which the plaintiff's lawsuit. No law specifically age of 10 years has set under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. In the case before the Supreme Court decision that Two defendants based on the P. Duck Are not legitimate. The act is in violation of P. Although both the plaintiff and the defendant is a defendant in any case before it must be considered both the plaintiff and the defendant is a party in proceedings before a court in the case. Judgement of the Supreme Court is binding by both the plaintiff and the defendant in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 145, paragraph one of the two defendants can not dispute the facts alleged to listen to other more Two defendants violated the Por Carry out the duties of the two defendants, the plaintiff is a representative of the entity. The plaintiff has the money to put to the court for the price of duck P. Judgement of the Supreme Court by then. The plaintiff has the right to take recourse to the two defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 76, paragraph one Judgement of the Supreme Court 3314/2549. Although the plaintiff is a trader's call for the delivery of which has a 2 year old under Section 193/34 (a) matter, but at the end of this section, provided the case is an exception that is not in the age of 2. that year unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. The need to consider the affairs of the debtor that kind of a business case. The two defendants buying fuel from the plaintiff to the buses. The two defendants operate offshore transport of passengers and cargo. Would hold that the two defendants from the plaintiff to buy fuel in the affairs of the two defendants. Which is to be the case with the exception Not in the age of 2 years by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1), but the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33

(5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 3097/2549. The defendant requested an open letter of credit to the plaintiff, a commercial bank to purchase goods from suppliers abroad. And give credit to the plaintiff by the defendant, a payment on behalf of the defendant before such a service is a type of commercial bank loans only. Yes, it is the case for the plaintiff to a business or a business administrator of a defendant or the defendant to structures instead of one under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) No it can not be taken. age of 2 years under these provisions shall apply in the case. And the defendant, a letter of credit agreement with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract, letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to receive the goods before. The plaintiff will pay later. Later, a defendant who has not received goods to pay the plaintiff the defendant owe the plaintiff has a contractual agreement, which trust receipts, which continued to contract, letters of credit. Obligations under the contract for trust receipts are currently no law on age, especially The 10 year old would under Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 2983/2549. The plaintiff sued the defendant liable under a contract for opening letters of credit. This is the case, the plaintiff must bind directly to the supplier, the beneficiary under letters of credit. The plaintiff is not the business of the structures to which a defendant and then call for a Sinhgrong will receive funds, including advances to the plaintiff was released before a defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7). liable to prosecution under the contract for opening letters of credit law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30. Defendant to a contract for opening letters of credit with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract for opening letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to obtain the product first and then make a payment to the plaintiff after Later, the defendant, not a product to receive payment

in full by the plaintiff. Debt under trust receipts are not indebted to the business of governance of others or for the various tasks which call for Sinhgrong will receive from it. And advance funds issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) When the law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30. Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 paragraph means that the unpaid interest that would terminate the portion of more than 5 years from the filing date back. The unpaid interest that has not more than five years and expire. The plaintiff has the right to demand interest on arrears from the date of filing back down to no more than 5 years. Judgement of the Supreme Court 2880/2549. Revenue Code Section 19 provisions to set up a Tax Authority is empowered to issue the summons filed by the investigation and issue a summons to witness To order the submission of evidence that the items or account Documents or proofs to be on the show. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that any person listed in the form of submission of incorrect or incomplete truth. Through the issuance of a summons must be made within two years from the date of the filing of the list. And if that is the case, the DirectorGeneral to approve the extension of time to issue a subpoena, it shall not exceed five years from the date of submission of the list. If the expiration of this will affect not only the Tax Authority the power to issue a summons to the subsequent investigation. And issue a summons to testify to order the submission of witness lists or the documents or other evidence to show only Yes, it is for the provision of age to claim the tax not paid. The issuance of a summons to the person who is responsible for the business tax under Section 91/21 (5) subject to the provisions of section 88 shall apply mutatis mutandis. The authority of the Tax Authority is not subject to section 19 by section in the statute of the Civil and Commercial Law Section 193/31 of the state that claims to call for tax to the age of 10 years, official assessment. has the authority to assess taxes from the plaintiff within the period of 10 years from the due date that the plaintiff must file a list of specific business tax. When the time is still in an age of such. Tax Authority would evaluate the plaintiff only has

to

pay

business

tax.

Judgement of the Supreme Court 2542/2549. The plaintiff claims filed by residents raised primarily of charges that The plaintiff deposited at the defendant. Later, someone else is a fake signature of the plaintiff's withdrawal from the account of the plaintiff. Committed by the defendant negligently allowed to withdraw. The plaintiff has been damaged. The defendant liable for payment of the plaintiff to be withdrawn with interest. Plaintiff's motion for such a look is deposited into the defendant returned the deposit agreement. Although the plaintiff may sue to describe the negligence of the defendant is to show that Defendant may be liable to the plaintiff for not fulfilling duties to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 659, paragraph three states only. Find the right to sue in the data, which violated the age of 1 year, the defendant did not petition. Claims for refund under the deposit law has no statute of the particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 2058/2549. The plaintiff the defendant made an agreement to buy land title deed No. 15658, and has purchased land dispute, a road adjacent to the land on May 20, 2519 to the date of 19 December 2521 the defendant registered the transfer of land title deed No. 15658. the plaintiff under an agreement to buy and to sell the land p ayments to the plaintiff some Considered the liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) age, would stop tripping. Time does not pass away before the to the prescription, and begins a new life since the age of reason that interrupted to end the Civil and Commercial Section 193/15 agreement to buy and to sell it without prescription by law. therefore only the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 and the new age begins from the date of 20 December 2521 on 27 October 2530 the defendant received a letter that the amount of 50,000 baht from the plaintiff the value of the land. the road as the purchase and sale agreement dated May 20, 2519 the balance will be paid to the date of the transfer agreement. Text in the book indicate that the defendant has been that the debt must be transferred as part of the land to the plaintiff

on the other road. It is a book for liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) the age, interrupted by another one. Time to pass before the count is not added to their age. And begins a new prescription from the October 18, 2530 onwards from the date of October 22, 2540 the plaintiff to prosecute this case no more than 10 years, it has not terminate the plaintiff. Abolishment is not ratified by the parties and stakeholders anyone would raise a waste of abolishment was claimed also by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 172, paragraph one problem that an agreement to buy land disputes is void. or not. It is a problem concerning the public order. Although the defendant does not raise this issue in the Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal. Defendant also has the right to raise this issue in the petition by the class. Code of Civil Procedure Section 249, paragraph two, even the land dispute is part of the road in the village where the defendant is the operator of the land and fall into servitude for the benefit of land allocated according to the National Executive Council No. 286 even, but servitude is just. But the owner Phan network. Property must accept karma, some which affect their property or to refrain from the exercise of certain assets which are in ownership of the property to benefit another And do not own any Paridrnepoit of karma, which will cause the interest of the burden. Yield reduction or loss of carrying out the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1387 and 1389 only network Phan property owner also owns the property. The laws do not prohibit sales or distribution, sale or ownership transfer Paridrnepoit in any way. The defendant as owner of the land dispute has the right to sell the disputed land. Agreement to buy land dispute can not be null and void. Defendant disputed land must be transferred to the plaintiff. Judgement of the Supreme Court 1802/2549. Insurance trig of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887 is one of life insurance. Which provided separately in Section 3 of Chapter 2, age of the recipient Insurance trig liability litigation. Must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Law Section 882, which is common in the first chapter of the same category. Which the prescribed age limit by then. Therefore not comparable to that provided in the case of life insurance and other categories may not

be a general under Section 193/30 of age shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case have Insurance trig. Call to shore up the insurer liable for claims that the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887, paragraph two states that "the injured party would like to receive the compensation they should have it directly from the insurer ...."The plaintiff sued the defendant is entitled to 4, without liability for compensation must show intent to equate the benefits from prior contracts. The age of litigation under section 882, paragraph one of the states prohibited from prosecution after the expiration of two years from the date of casualty is the law specifically provides that from the date of the casualty. It can not apply the general principles of the age, under Section 193/12 comes into force apply to this case or be interpreted as something else, so when the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit expiration of two years from the date of casualty, the plaintiff in the case of the defendant. 4, then terminate the. Judgement of the Supreme Court 667/2549. Although overdraft loan agreement, the Agreement to add overdraft loan, which must also account the nature of the contract will not be scheduled. Account contracts, independent agreement that is unique. The contract will maintain a go on it must be widespread and ongoing accounting within a reasonable time. Facts show that pharmacist. Bringing the money into accounts for less Thon, which circulate in the final account on 14 March 2526 and there is no accounting for current account and stuff from the pharmacist on. Died a long time, almost 12 years show that pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default then. The plaintiff is a financial institution is required to monitor the client's account at all times that what is moving. When it appears that the pharmacist. The plaintiff's customers no account activity. The plaintiff would have to call or terminate the contract in a reasonable time. Marks are not the right thinking long-term interest in this unreasonable. Considered that the use of the rights of the plaintiff does not act in good faith. The contract is considered closed in from the pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default is the date of 14 March 2526 at which pharmacist. Circulate the final accounting. Claims of the plaintiff to recover under

overdraft had happened since then. Claims under the age of 10 years is scheduled to bring the case to the plaintiff to sue on February 5, 2539 expiration of 10 years for loans under the current account, so terminate the contract. However, it appears that pharmacist. Brought land and built mortgaged as collateral for such debt in the amount of 5,500,000 baht plus interest at a rate of 15 percent per year with an agreement that if the plaintiff shall mortgage money is not enough debt to allow forced out of the property. until the end, even as other obligations under the contract will terminate the account. However, if required by P.WedWed Section 193/27 and section 745 that is, the plaintiff is the mortgagee to enforce payment of the mortgage assets, even when the mortgage debt that is insured, then terminate the time. But are forced to pay the interest owed over the past five years can not And constant force, but only property pharmacist. Mortgage only. Will be required from other property not more than five. Even though the mortgage agreement is determined to force out of other assets until the end. If force is not enough money to pay the mortgage debt even. (Meeting No. 3 / 2548). Judgement of the Supreme Court 142/2549. Claims incurred by the compromise agreement with the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/32, whether claims are the same age, does the second defendant, a breach of contract and the compromise on October 10. 2539 plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 29, 2542 to no more than 10 years and do not expire. Judgement of the Supreme Court 8712/2548. The provisions of Section 193/33 and 193/34 section of the Civil and Commercial Code. Despite the age, demanding the same salary, but Section 193 / 34 (9) If an employee is called out of money by working under an employment agreement from your employer. Employer or employers run out of money due from the employee to return from the Section 193/33 (4) is not the case that the other employees call for salary payment types. From those who have the responsibility to pay. Which is scheduled to pay in time. The plaintiff sued the employee, the employer called the defendant to pay the

salary and accommodation rights under the employment agreement, which is 2 years old and under Section 193/34 (9), not 5 years under Section 193/33 (4). Judgement of the Supreme Court 8007/2548. Debt arising from the debtor, a corporate business purpose the hotel kitchen equipment with the installation of creditors. Perpetrated for profit in the business of the debtor to continue. Therefore the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1). Judgement of the Supreme Court 7656/2548. 1 defendant received a letter of liability to the plaintiff on May 13, 2540 by the plaintiff that a debt loan is 60,000 baht as evidence of the effect of loans in writing and in writing with the state debt. The loans are no legal age limit of particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the book debts without the condition, age, in itself, but with age, resulting in a debt was interrupted. When the date of May 13, 2540 until October 24, 2544, the date the plaintiff to prosecute within 10 years can not terminate the. The liability of the debtor if debtor is not the fault condition after the debt is old enough to terminate the life of two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/35. Judgement of the Supreme Court at 450. 7 / 2547. Claims within the meaning of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/35 shall be payable if the debtor is a debt already. Later terminate the debt. After the debtor has received state liability is evidenced in writing. When the action of debt obligations under the age of 10 years, while the defendant to accept a liability to the plaintiff in writing that do not expire and is not to look under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/35 of the age of 2 years, but must be used. age of 10 years, but with the liability under the Civil and Commercial Code and Section 193/14. 193/15. Judgement of the Supreme Court 3314/2549. Although the plaintiff is a trader called out to deliver the value of

which is scheduled for a two-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) matter, but at the end of Section 193/34 (1) states. case is an exception that is not in the age of two years of that. Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. The need to consider the affairs of the debtor that kind of a business case. The two defendants from the plaintiff to purchase fuel used by passenger cars. Both the defendant operates offshore transport of passengers and cargo. Would hold that the two defendants from the plaintiff to buy fuel in the affairs of the two defendants to a case which is not an exception in the age of two years by the end of Section 193/34 (1) and by regardless of whether the two defendants from the plaintiff to purchase fuel used. Resold or used goods for sale or not. By the two defendants claimed. Claims of the plaintiff has an age limit of five years under Section 193/33 (5). Judgement of the Supreme Court 4342/2548. The creditors filed an application for payment of debt service to legal counsel. Considered to be a case of creditors who call for the legal profession. The tasks that the debtor is a 2-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (16) without the need to remember is that in the case of the official FDA-License equate the success of each case and the case is not the amount of accrued salary and money. other in a manner similar to a payable for a period of 5 years of age who under Section 193/33 (4), and despite the payment of a monthly period is not a salary paid. Employee under an employment agreement. Judgement of the Supreme Court 4858/2548. The plaintiff hired the defendant to road construction. The contract has a contract look to the plaintiff to pay the money. The value of construction to the shops instead of the defendant before. The plaintiff then proceeds to offset the wages received by the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendants are also indebted to the plaintiff. The plaintiff asked the defendant forced to pay back the funds are not subject to the plaintiff. Commercial or industrial operators who are hired to retrieve their cash advances. Spent in work for the employer from Employer under section 193 / 34 (1), age 2 years, but the case is that the plaintiff is called the employer to pay money to advance

their own behalf. Hired from contractors. Which has no legal age limit of the particular There was an age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 5826/2548. The plaintiff operates a garage, car trader has a contract with the defendant. Liability insurance recipients to use the compensation or repair your car insured casualty to the defendant, the defendant's trades. The plaintiff, a trader called out of their wages, repair the insured vehicle. Casualty and the defendant is a call for wage or value of work. Were made to the business of the defendant, a debtor If required by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) and Section 193 / 34 (1) age of 5 years. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6198/2548. The plaintiff is a trader called out to deliver the value of the defendant. The defendant was a merchant by buying goods from the plaintiff to then be sold to another customer to one transaction, there appear to be made to the Company's accounts receivable department. Exceptions to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) the end is the age of 5 years under Section 193/33 (5) The shipping fee that the plaintiff represented the defendant to advance it arising. Because the plaintiff to sell the defendant. It is money that the plaintiff had issued a merchant advances to the Company's accounts receivable department itself into an exception under Section 193/34 (a) the end is not the money to transport goods to the advances under Section 193/34 (. 3) Income on transportation costs to the plaintiff from such advances is the age of 5 years under Section 193/33 (5) as well. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6786/2548. The term "wages or other Wage" the employee claims the employer is taken from the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (9) Represents Wage under section 575, a right arising under the contract. But the right to receive damages from unfair dismissal. Including the right to receive compensation, and notice that instead of Wage. Employees called out from the employer. Which the rights arising from termination of employment after the contract expired.

No rights under the contract. Not in force of Article 193 / 34 (9) is 10 years old and under Section 193/30. Judgement of the Supreme Court 1584/2548. Demand deposit account and current account overdraft credit agreements specific product. Circle believes credit card Clearly stated that Intended to pay for goods and services. Arising from the use of credit cards. And to withdraw cash from bank account via automatic withdrawal. Which are all transactions in relation to the total credit card usage. Opening current accounts are not used as an opening for a regular withdrawal. But the current account to the defendant to pay debts arising from the use Credit Card sole specific Not the case that the plaintiff by the defendant agreed to truncate account debt incurred in the business but. Between the plaintiff and the defendant then offset each other. And would pay, but the number remaining which key aspects of the contract account under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 856 debt thus find loans overdraft or debt under current account is not the plaintiff has paid money to. creditors of the defendant before. Or allow the defendant to the plaintiff's credit card to withdraw cash from cash deposits. And then automatically charged to the defendant after the plaintiff is deemed that a business in the work of the various I have run out of money before the advance nature of the business credit card type. Therefore the age of 2 years under Section 193/34 (7). Judgement of the Supreme Court 3830/2547. The plaintiff to provide a credit card membership fees. The plaintiff is a business to get the various members of the plaintiff and paid to creditors of its members instead of members first. Including that the plaintiff give the defendant credit card to withdraw cash from deposit withdrawals automatically and then charge members after the call for the advances that have already set off before the case is considered that the plaintiff is a business of. for the tasks. I have run out of money before the advance. Claims on debt that is 2 years old and under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) Although this case the defendant to pay the last debt on September 27, 2543, but even when the plaintiff has not been let. disabled defendants to terminate the contract or credit card use credit card The fact that

after the defendant to show the last payment to the defendant. Credit card to use many times. Last November 5, 2543 on behalf of the defendant to pay plaintiff. Plaintiffs submitted billing statement to the defendant. The defendant to pay the debt on December 12, 2543 shall be considered as the plaintiff may enforce claims from the due date it. Not the date the last defendant to pay debts. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 29, 2545 expiration of two years is not the case does not terminate the plaintiff. Judgement of the Supreme Court 3856/2547. Purchases from the plaintiff to the defendant to sell the customer one more. The transaction has to be done to the nature of the business of the debtor is a party defendant itself under the Civil and Commercial Section 194/34 (a) the end of that word meaning is wider than the purchase for resale to. But only. It also covers cases where the debtor may be subject to any such action. Modifications to the product before selling another class. Which is the nature of the profession. It would not be buying. For own consumption. Prescription claims of the plaintiff shall have the period of 5 years not 2 years. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6180/2547. Debt claims on the sale of goods from the buyer of the old merchant difference. Under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) and Section 193 / 33 (5), ie the two-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) and five years as an exception in Section 193. 34 (1) at the end ...Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself, if such an exception will be the business or work at the shop. The merchant is considered that the goods purchased. Bring such products to buyers in the business or work at a merchant buyer or not. If the buyer to purchase goods to the buyer in the business of trading and then. Debt claims on the sale of the old trader for five years as the restrictions that goods traded must be the product operator Commercial produced for sale to buyers specifically not Although the product is traded in the market, it is subject to the provisions of Section two is like a different law for the word "business" has the meaning of any cover that has to do is made obtainable Nature of occupation. Not limited only to animals but to sell or buy products to sell. Continue or to produce a new product.

Defendant is a limited company operates hotels and restaurants, which provide business services. And distribution of food to the service users of the defendant's hotel. Products purchased from the plaintiff that the defendant is a consumer goods group cup bowl dishes, which are devices used for eating and serving food in the dining room as part of the business of the defendant. Given that the defendant is accused purchases such as equipment in service in Business of the defendant. If it falls into force of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) the end of the plaintiff's claims, so the five years of age. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6476/2547. The plaintiff is a state enterprise established in accordance with Metropolitan Waterworks Authority Act, WedProf. That the 2510 Act, Section 6 states that "the establishment of water supply to be called. "The Metropolitan Water" The purpose of the following (2) production and distribution of water delivery in Bangkok area. , Nonthaburi Province. Samut Prakan, and (3) Other business-related or beneficial to the water "from the provisions. Can see that the plaintiff has the purpose of selling water. And other business related to the water with the word "merchant" under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) is a word that changes the words in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 165 (a) the original. use of the word "merchant", so the term "trader" has the meaning wider than the term "merchant" Although the plaintiff is not a merchant, but it is considered a merchant within the meaning of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34. (1) and when this case is the mortgage unit water several times. The plaintiff claims may force water bill from the date of register unit water Water each time as it appears each receipt. However, the plaintiff sued a water bill, which funds the call for the work to be done when more than two years the plaintiff's claims and therefore terminate. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6504/2547. Amounting to 100 baht in savings accounts of the defendant since the defendant has been defaulted debt first. The agreement of the plaintiff's credit card debt deduction immediately. The plaintiff left a long time to go to a year and then deducted to pay debts.

Circumstances such as this. In addition, it is not the plaintiff's rights under the terms of the contract. It also shows that action. The plaintiff has the right to live under the law as a way to get the plaintiff but Solely by the interest in between. And to provide a prescription interrupted. Regardless of the damage to the other party will receive. This is a small exercise in bad faith under the Civil and Commercial Section 5 is not interrupted to the prescription. The plaintiff claims of the plaintiff as commission credits over two years, so terminate the case. Judgement of the Supreme Court 751/2547. The plaintiff is the infrastructure of the business. Metropolitan Electricity Authority Act. Plaintiff's status as a state. The implementation of the objectives will receive a capital budget under section 12 (3), with or without a relationship between the plaintiff and the state. Part of the plaintiff's property is not in the enforcement of liability under Section 14 of the plaintiff as a Nitiseampoanht government above the private sector to take specific enforcement of the plaintiff's property only. For the implementation of the objectives in the supply and distribution of electricity to People of the plaintiff. Relations Law between private parties is especially the case with the lawsuit claims. The current debt purposes. The plaintiff then fell as traders under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) When the defendant defaulted on the plaintiff to the defendant may demand repayment from the date of December 23, 2540, to begin since the age of 24 days. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit in December 2540 called to pay for electricity based on power measurement unit as usual. Which claims to have made the job on June 16, 2543 over two years would claim the cost of electricity, so terminate the lawsuit. Judgement of the Supreme Court 6683/2545. Electricity Authority as a plaintiff state the purpose of distribution of energy. Power to benefit the plaintiff, so plaintiff is a trader under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) the plaintiff's right to claim power from consumers prescription has a 2 year Electricity contracts that a defendant must pay for electricity to the

plaintiff on a monthly basis each month. The electricity that a defendant due in May 2538. Have to start from age, from 1 June 2538 at which date the plaintiff may enforce such claims on. When the plaintiff filed a charge of electricity payable on January 28, 2542 2 years overdue, so terminate the plaintiff's case. And the plaintiff has no right to sue to force the two defendants are liable as a guarantor.