Your Rubric - Print View

http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=PrintRubric&rubric_id=...

Rubric Made Using: RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

My Language Portfolio
Teacher Name: Ms. Amorrortu

Student Name:

________________________________________

CATEGORY Selection of elements

3
All elements and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the portfolio. A wide variety of samples is included. All elements are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of the item including title, author, and date. The writing is free of grammatical, syntax spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication and no editing is required. Texts are coherent and show cohesion.

2
Elements are mostly related to the purpose of the portfolio. A reasonable variety of samples are included. Elements are described.

1
Elements are not related to the purpose of the portfolio. Very few samples included. Elements are not properly described or are not described at all.

Quality of texts

Grammatical, syntax, spelling and punctuation errors do not hinder understanding. Text are reasonably coherent and show cohesion.

There are many grammatical, syntax, spelling and punctuation errors which hinders understanding. Texts are not coherent and do not show cohesion. Reflections are not included. There are not future goals.

Reflection

All reflections clearly Some reflections and describe growth, improvement goals are achievement, included. accomplishments, and include goals for continued learning (long and short term). All images, media and text follow copyright guidelines with accurate citations. All content throughout the eportfolio displays the appropriate copyright permissions. Neat, professional appearance, logical organization, and easy access to documents. Moslty all images, media and text follow copyright guidelines with accurate citations. All content throughout the eportfolio displays the appropriate copyright permissions.

Reference of Sources

Copyright guidelines are not followed. No attributions to the owner of sources are made.

Organization & Appearance

Neat, with mainly logical Messy, unprofessional organization; most appearance, unorganized, documents easy to access. and difficult to locate documents.

Use of 2.0 apps

All of the 2.0 apps effectively enhance understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships, create interest, and are appropriate for the chosen purpose.

Mostly all 2.0 apps enhance understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships, create interest, and are appropriate for the chosen purpose.

2.0 apps included do not enhance understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships, do not create interest, and are not appropriate for the chosen purpose.

1 of 2

11/06/2012 9:48

Your Rubric - Print View

http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=PrintRubric&rubric_id=...

Accessibility

The eportfolio is easy to read. Color, background, font styles (italic, bold, underline) and type size for headings, sub-headings and text are used consistently and enhance the readability throughout the eportfolio. All pages connect to the Table of Contents, and all external links connect to the appropriate website or file.

The eportfolio is easy to read overall. Use of typographic devices is mostly appropriate. Links to external files are provided

The eportfolio is difficult to read. No external links provided.

Progress

Chronological comparison Chronological comparison No significant progress is between submissions between submissions shown when comparing shows great improvement. shows adecuate progress. submissions chronologically.

Copyright 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse

2 of 2

11/06/2012 9:48