You are on page 1of 4

Strategic Direction

Emerald Article: Case studies in CSR: How to move from gloss to strategy

Article information:
To cite this document: (2007),"Case studies in CSR: How to move from gloss to strategy", Strategic Direction, Vol. 24 Iss: 1 pp. 12 - 14 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02580540810839287 Downloaded on: 05-06-2012 References: This document contains references to 3 other documents To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com This document has been downloaded 4755 times since 2008. *

Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: *


Andr H.J. Nijhof, Ronald J.M. Jeurissen, (2010),"The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility: Consequences of a business case approach towards CSR", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 30 Iss: 11 pp. 618 - 631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443331011085222 Luis Moreno, (2010),"Welfare mix, CSR and social citizenship", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 30 Iss: 11 pp. 683 - 696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443331011085268 James DeLisle, Terry Grissom, (2011),"Valuation procedure and cycles: an emphasis on down markets", Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 29 Iss: 4 pp. 384 - 427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635781111150312

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY For Authors: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Additional help for authors is available for Emerald subscribers. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Case studies in CSR


How to move from gloss to strategy

hether you like it or not, if you run a company of considerable size there is little chance that you have managed to avoid the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Executives are increasingly aware that they are expected to offer some sort of benet to the wider world: newspaper articles, academic papers, the activities of their peers and the public all tell them so. Many now worry that if their company is not seen to be making environmentally and morally aware social contributions as part of their day to day operations then they will lose their customers and risk their reputations. But recognising the demand and fullling it are two different things.

For many companies, core business and CSR are an awkward pairing. If their product base or services do not overlap with any pressing environmental or societal concerns, they feel that CSR is entirely an extra-curricular activity that has to be taken part in merely to appease public relations. CSR thus becomes costly and distracting, and furthermore offers little real benet to the company. Indeed, the majority of organizations perceive a very close relationship between CSR and PR but fail to see the potential links between CSR and strategic and organizational benets. Even less often do executives envisage an immediate link between fullling the publics demands and a positive impact on the bottom line. Despite this, business writers are increasingly trying to explain and nd acceptance for the point that for CSR to be worthwhile it must become a central and not a peripheral activity, whatever the business. CSR is about much more than PR and to fail to grasp that is to waste resources and miss out on real business opportunities. Only, we are told, when CSR and business strategy develop together can the corporate and social spheres both enjoy the benets. So what would you do? If your shareholders demanded that you had to become more involved with CSR, how would you do it? Would you know which moves would be really valuable and which would in effect be little more than gloss? Think about the following case studies.

Taxis and GE
Radio Taxis Group is the London cab rm that rst gained CarbonNeutral accreditation. The company won the CSR category in last years CIMA Financial Management Awards and has been granted ISO 14001 accreditation. These rewards are the result of MD Andrew Herberts 2004 decision to commit seriously to societal and environmental issues. Since then, every driver has been trained in using equipment for the disabled and knowing when help should and should not be offered to avoid causing offence. Ofces use green energy and have slashed paper consumption. Given the fact that black cabs are have not yet been

PAGE 12

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

VOL. 24 NO. 1 2008, pp. 12-14, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 0258-0543

DOI 10.1108/02580540810839287

What is essential to a real strategic approach is nding a link between business activities and the society in which it operates.

redesigned to cut carbon emissions, there was little that could be done about the taxis themselves. Therefore, to offset their impact on the environment, Radio Taxis Group invests in projects in India, Sri Lanka, New Zealand and Jamaica to deliver solar powered lighting, wind turbines, energy-efcient light bulbs and so on. As a result of these decisions, the rm is CarbonNeutral and has enjoyed much good publicity as a result. It is, however, a strategy that costs Herberts company 120,000 a year. Now consider GE. The power giant has a scheme that contributes greatly to underperforming US high schools. Specic schools are adopted, and each of them receives up to $1million in contributions over a ve year period. In addition to this, the schools receive in-kind donations and the time of GE staff, who help teachers assess needs and then get involved with mentoring and teaching students. As a result of this program, schools have shown signicant improvements and graduation rates have doubled. Further, the program has improved relations between GE and local governments and employees are proud of their involvement. While the positive CSR contributions of both organizations are both indisputable and highly commendable, neither rm illustrates what could be labelled a mastery of CSR. In Radio Taxis case, the rm is spending a large amount of money to try and full social and moral imperatives. Though Herbert is very aware about delivering prots to shareholders, he admits that There are always complications with green issues . . . Certainties dont exist in this eld yet, so we have to make judgements as best we can. Though these judgements have attracted good PR, it is always difcult to prove that contributions in Sri Lanka have had much impact on how the average person in London makes transport decisions. Similarly, taxi pollution in London remains the same and is ironically, due to this good PR, further encouraged. Herbert might be making up for the environmental damage of his company but he isnt changing his basic business premise to avoid it in the rst place. GE can be judged in a similar way. Again, though the companys impact on specic lives has been huge, these social efforts do not relate directly to customer activity or to GEs core product. GE can therefore only claim that its CSR activities have a modest impact on its recruiting and retention and little impact on its day to day business.

Tensions between business and society


The reason both these examples fail to illustrate simultaneous signicant benet for the business and society is that they have not overcome the inherent tensions between the two. Porter and Kramer advise strongly that the most effective CSR models start by only considering social issues that are directly relevant to the rms business. Further, they seek not to mitigate harm but to nd ways to reinforce corporate strategy by advancing social conditions. But what is essential to a real strategic approach is nding a link between business activities and the society in which it operates. Take Standard Chartered, just one of a huge number of nancial institutions who have moved into sustainable banking. Though based in London, the companys income comes primarily from Asia, Africa and the Middle East, all markets that suffer from poverty, disease and environmental issues. The bank recognised that there was a direct relationship between social issues and its prots. In 1999, 10 percent of employees in Kenya missed work because of HIV and AIDS, with accompanying costs to the business. In response, Standard Chartered began a global community campaign, which seeks to raise awareness about HIV and thus prevent its further spread. Its skills and resources have enabled the bank to

VOL. 24 NO. 1 2008 STRATEGIC DIRECTION PAGE 13

ofcially pledge to educate 1m people about the disease by 2009. The company has a similar campaign that targets the restoration of sight. These programs, as well as offering huge benets to the communities in which they operate, do far more than create a good reputation for Standard Chartered. Both programs are a core part of the banks sustainability strategy to promote economic growth. As nance director Richard Meddings explains, The cost of treatment is often small but the impact on the person and their ability to contribute to the community is huge. The community, of course, includes branches of Standard Chartered, whose prots rely on and healthy and efcient workforce. Standard Chartered is joined by companies such as Nestle and Microsoft in its practice of the most effective CSR. Both these latter rms have similarly recognised that their prots depend on their communities, and thus both have put considerable resource into targeting social problems in the areas in which the operate. When distinctive strategy is inseparable from social impact in this way, then a company has achieved real CSR goals.

Comment
This is a review of Capital gains by Ruth Prickett, Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility by Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer, and Sustainable banking by John Willman, Mike Scott, Eoin Callan, Kimberly Wilson, Fiona Harvey, Ed Crooks, Richard Lapper, Jane Croft, Kate Burgess and Leo Johnson. Capital gains describes the award-winning corporate social responsibility initiatives undertaken by London cab rm Radio Taxis Group. The company became carbon neutral in 2005 thanks to its commitment to the environment. Prickett points out that this status comes at an annual cost of 120,000 a year, though in return the company has gained good publicity, an ISO 140041 accreditation and a nancial management reward. Porter and Kramer show that thanks to a change in the publics expectations of company policy, many organizations have had to rethink their attitudes towards corporate social responsibility. They identify four prevailing justications for CSR, commenting that each of them focus on the tension between business and society rather than on the strategy and operations of any specic organization. After advising on how companies might best nd useful points of intersection between themselves and society, thee authors conclude that it is possible to create a sustainable competitive advantage that also makes a real difference to the wider world. Keywords: Environmental management, Social responsibility, Corporate strategy, Society, Business performance Sustainable banking considers the social and environmental sustainable agendas being adopted at nancial institutions. It presents the shortlist for the Financial Times Sustainable Banking Awards, which reects an increasing interest in these agendas across the banking sector thanks to the realisation that environmental policy can lead to prot and growth. The paper explains how these awards are administered and judged and offers last years winner HSBC as an example. Additionally, it presents further short articles around the same topic.

References
Prickett, R. (2007), Capital gains, Financial Management (UK), May, pp. 21-2, ISSN 1471-9185. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (79), Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 No. 12, December, pp. 78-9, ISSN 0017-8012. Willman, J., Scott, M., Callan, E., Wilson, K., Harvey, F., Crooks, E., Lapper, R., Croft, J., Burgess, K. and Johnson, L. (2007), Sustainable banking, Financial Times, 7 June, pp. 1-6, ISSN 0307-1766.

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

PAGE 14 STRATEGIC DIRECTION VOL. 24 NO. 1 2008

You might also like