TRIAL BRIEF IN FRONT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF APPEAL COPIES TO AMERICAN HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND US SENATE ON THE BENCH:

THE RIGHT HONORABLE JUSTICE KNOW STENCH ADDRESS: INFINITE SUMMIT FLOOR, FEDERATED ETERNITY CHAMBERS, 333, INTERNATIONAL WEB FREEWAY, GLOBAL CYBER SPACE DOME, TWIN CITIES OF FREEDOM & WISDOM. RESTRICTIONS: NONE OPEN SITTING FORUM WORLD PUBLIC WELCOME. LOUIS LECLEZIO FAMILY et al. Plaintiffs v. MICHAEL & MYRNA DARLAND DONORS TO FREEDOMWORKS & THEIR CLAIM: FREE SPEECH OUR PROPERTY. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 04 - TRUTH - 2- B - 1 PLAINTIFFS' TRIAL BRIEF

Plaintiffs' Trial Brief

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction........................................................................................... 3 2. Background History......6 3. Authoritative Documents .............................................................7 4. US and International Authorities... .10 5. Hearing Transcript... 13 6. Google Free Speech.. ..19 7. Main Street Matters25 8. Law Provisions. ..................29 9. Pleadings30 10. Conclusion 31 11. Excerpts from Post .. ....31 12. Past posts. 43 13. Google Notices. .. 43 14. US Congress US Senate.. ..43 15. Attorney James D. McBride.45 16. Snocadia Pictures.....50

17. My profile.. .50 18. MUSIC: We are the world Our own song Think Je Chante Avec Toi Libert Le Morne.

1. INTRODUCTION

At issue:
1. Should contributors and /or subscribers to FreedomWorks work to restrict and control Free Speech globally in order to avoid being embarrassed by warranted Free Speech? 2. Are Google international policies set by the Google board or can Google policies be shaped and dictated to the Google board ad lib by any small time Judge from any small town USA? In this case: Judge Michael E. Cooper from the small rural desert town of Ellensburg (Pop. 18,174 in 2010) issued a Court Order denying Free Speech across International frontiers while vesting unto him powers of global jurisdiction. 3. This Brief is about a small time judge from small town America

triggering a momentous momentum gathering Snowball through a hasty off the cuff ruling denying Freedom of Speech to an individual posting

from Africa. The poor attempt by Judge Michael E. Cooper to squash Free Speech across international frontiers has boomeranged. Judge Michael E Coopers ruling has shaped and sent a snowball rolling down slippery slopes. Moreover, it appears that Judge Cooper granted such a hurried and rash irrational ruling within minutes in an effort to please a hometown attorney crony. The snowball has now landed on the

international stage. Bursting open on landing, the snowball has splashed this story, worthy of international attention, all over the world media.

The Banner Reads: Free Speech cannot be denied to anyone anyhow anywhere over the globe by any small time Judge from just about any small town in America.
Journalists and commentators are likely to draw parallels between the conflict involving Michael L. Darland, Judge Michael E. Cooper, Google and Louis Leclezio, with the Glenn Beck v. Isaac Eiland-Hall case history handled by First Amendment expert attorney Mark Randazza. That legal conflict between Beck and Eiland-Hall caused the Streisand effect. It is the phenomenon where an individuals attempt to censor material on the internet in turn proves to make the material more public.

Media is likely to increasingly cover the Louis Leclezio web sites www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info under construction

concerning Leclezios right to global Free Speech because Michael L. Darland and Judge Michael E. Cooper have caused, during a hearing

lasting minutes only, Google to shut down various Leclezio blogs, some on the web since 2008, namely www.snocadia.blogspot.com and also

www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com without a trial, without any form of due process and without any just cause.

And, in addition, Google was also requested to remove two other totally harmless posts from www.lleclezio.blogspot.com just because they both mentioned the name of Michael L. Darland and the one referred to the Republican Party!

By docilely caving in to any kind of an order from any kind of a small time Judge from any kind of a small town in the USA Did Google seriously jeopardize both the control of the Internet by the US and Googles iconic MISSION STATEMENT:

Googles mission is to organize the worlds information and make it universally accessible and useful.
4. How could the world remain silent when Judge Michael E. Cooper, from such a small rural American desert town, trampled over the Constitution, the American Bill of Rights and the sacred right of ALL individuals, around the globe, to Free Speech and the right of ALL to be fully and impartially informed all over the free world?

5.

How could the world remain silent when Judge Michael E. Cooper,

from such a small rural American desert town, indirectly condones Perjury - Fraud - Coercion Corruption Intimidation and Blackmail? In so doing, does the said Judge in essence promote crime by stifling Free Speech and muting a voice eager to expose an alleged repeat criminal for the better good of all?

6.

The International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and

the US Senate are hereby asked to find and declare unequivocally that: Free Speech is sacred to all around the globe including within the United States of America. Such a Declaration is an absolute must for all peoples around the globe to have unlimited access to international information in an impartial manner regardless as to whether the Internet is controlled by the US or the UN.

7.

The global stakes are too high to delay an International ruling

stating clearly that, while the Internet is under US control, NO small town Judge in the United States of America can ad lib dictate to the International community which individual from which country is Free to enjoy his sacred rights to Free Speech and who is not. In this instance, an individual from the Republic of Mauritius - Africa is supposedly, according to a reckless court order, no longer entitled to such a sacred right.

2. Background History
Solely to protect himself from being exposed to the embarrassing truth, an American individual, Michael L. Darland, ironically, one of the biggest donors to FreedomWorks in Washington State, America, requested that a Judge from small town, USA, should issue a ruling denying Free Speech to Louis Leclezio in Mauritius Africa. If allowed to stand, that fatal landmark ruling, could, in fact, snowball to affect the right to Free Speech and to Free Impartial Information of all world citizens. Fortunately, that ill thought ruling has served to highlight the loose regulations controlling Free Speech across jurisdictional frontiers in a global world while the Internet is controlled by the US. On October 11, 2011, Free Speech was denied to Louis Leclezio (Residing and posting on the Internet from The Sovereign Republic of Mauritius) by Judge Michael E. Cooper. That small desert town Judge casually granted his off the cuff ruling to, in effect, deny Free Speech across International frontiers from his bench located in the small rural town of Ellensburg (pop. 18,174 in 2010). In so doing, Judge Michael E. Cooper sent the entire concept of American Freedom, as painted by America and imagined by citizens of the world, outside America, sliding down very slippery slopes. Did that ruling give Freedom and its works a huge black eye all around the globe? The rest of the world instantly viewed that ruling as a domineering, arbitrary and capricious dictatorial order handed down by a small town autocratic Judge imposing HIS despotic will with pleasure upon a global community aspiring for ever greater freedoms. Indeed, Judge Michael E. Cooper did trigger a huge snow ball. That huge snow ball, unleashed in America over property on the high Cascade Mountain ski slopes by the Michael L. Darland and Judge Michael E. Cooper cold and callous story, freezing the right to Free Speech of people in warm Africa has generated an avalanche of legal issues, opinions and responses. The ripple effect should keep lapping all over the shores of the world for some time. At least, until such time as the International Court of Appeals, The House of Congress and The US Senate decree and enacts new legislation to rule out the possibility that any small time Judge from any small town in America could ever again tar the big image of a Free America world wide by demonstrating to an African, with pleasure, how Freedom can NOT Work in Free America. (See Document # 26 P.12 lines 4-11 & P.13 line 21)

3. TABLE OF AUTHORITATIVE DOCUMENTS ESTABLISHING TRUTH 1. Louis Leclezio Sworn Declaration re Michael L. Darland Free Speech My Property. 2. Michael L. Darland Perjury Highlights. 3. Who is Louis Leclezio by Michael L. Darland. 3a Notarized Mike Moyer's Affidavit 03-01-05. Where was Popp's false Affidavit in 2005? 4. Michael Darland - Louis Leclezio defined as owners by Darland to Cascade Land Conservancy 5. Michael L. Darland confirms under oath that Louis Leclezio OWNS the property in Summary Judgment Motion Document in 2005. 6. Michael L. Darland & Louis Leclezio (Plaintiffs) OWN the Property - Summary Judgment Decision granted by Judge Michael E. Cooper in 2005. 7. Michael L. Darland - Questionable answers by Darland to Interrogatories 052905. 8. Michael L. Darland and Louis Leclezio Supplemental Memo prepared By Brian J. Dorsey confirming the Darland Leclezio verbal agreement. 9. Michael L. Darland & Myrna Darland signed Quit Claim Deed July 28 2003. 10.Michael L. Darland - Sequence of mail establishes the fraud perpetrated by Michael L. Darland and Ellensburg attorney Douglas W. Nicholson on Louis Leclezio. 11. Michael L. Darland's different truths to fit different agendas.

12.Michael L. Darland - Varying versions of the truth - Compare with subsequent

Court filings. 12a Michael L. Darland states the property is serviced since 1973 in one forum and NOT serviced in another venue! (Compare Doc # 12a with

Document # 20 P.7 Para 6.11 lines 5-10) 13. Newspaper reports vary from Darland's version re 1993 Digital

Systems/Darland settlement claims. (Compare Docs #7 P.5 & Doc # 13) 14.Michael L. Darland insists on control. Later blames Leclezio for Darlands failures. 15.Michael L. Darland - A miser, complains about Douglas W. Nicholsons exorbitant fees. 16.Michael L. Darland 'compassionate' letter upon hearing Leclezio's cancer has been confirmed (Compare Doc. # 16 030306 Darland letter with Doc. # 42 Darland 2012 letter. 17.Michael L. Darland - Reply from Louis Leclezio to Darland's 'compassionate' letter after Leclezio advised his suspected cancer had been confirmed. 18.Louis Leclezio reminds Douglas War Nicholson, attorney Ellensburg, of his fiduciary obligations towards Louis Leclezio. 19.Michael L. Darland valuations including Leclezio's 26 acres valued by Darland at a minimum of $7million. Then stolen by Michael L. Darland for $0! 20.Michael L. Darland NOW states under oath that the Darlands alone OWN the property! (Compare this Document # 20 P. 3 Para 3.5 with Document # 5). 21.Douglas Warr Nicholson Attorney Ellensburg - Can you - Should you ever trust such a lawyer? 22.Michael L. Darland failed to perform Cross Claim by Louis Leclezio. 23.Washington State Bar Association, in Seattle, finds Michael L. Darland has NO credibility. The Bar is most polite not to call Michael L. Darland and his star

witness William Popp, liars. 24.Michael L. Darland appeals the WSBA ruling Michael L. Darland has to deny Louis Leclezio legal representation to be able to defraud Leclezio of his property. 25.Washington State Bar Association Appeals Review Board confirms their earlier ruling against Michael L. Darland. 26.How Michael L. Darland finally 'won' in front of a Judge in a desert country, rural court, after years of perjury and vile ducking and diving tactics. 27.Contrary to Jeff Slothowers representation to the Court, on October 11, 2011 - All parties HAD Louis Leclezios physical address at least since September 24, 2011. 28.What is a Notarized Affidavit in 2010/2011, 7 & 8 years after the fact, by William Popp worth? Why was there no such Notarized Affidavit in 2005? 29.Michael L. Darland Memo Takings without Compensation 2004. (Is sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander?) 30.Michael L. Darland fully understands the transaction in 2005. Where & when the shoe fits, in these Thoughts and Comments document by Darland, Darland must wear that shoe in 2011. 31.Memorandum of Understanding prepared by Darland for Leclezio to sign in 2004. 32. Did Michael L. Darland plan to defraud Leclezio all along?

33.Louis Leclezio Declaration revised and approved by Michael L. Darland in 2005. 34. Michael L. Darland Blue Sky offers to sell encumbered real estate fraudulently. 35.Michael L. Darland, a fraudster sees Fraud by all & Matters of fact issue when

convenient. 36.Copy of letter Louis Leclezio sent to Michael L. Darland re unpaid bills 12-3004. 37.Trial Brief in 2005. Where is William Popps Notarized Affidavit in support of that brief? 38.What is W. Popps late Affidavit in 2011 worth against R. Kloss in support of motion in 2005? 39.What is Popp's 2011 Affidavit worth compared to M. Moyer's one supporting the 2005 Motion? 39a Notarized Affidavit from Mike Moyer 03-01-05. 40.Settlement Agreement between Michael L. Darland, Louis Leclezio & Snoqualmie Pass Utility District reached on or about September 29, 2005. 41.Analysis of Kittitas County Court Proceedings held on October 11, 2011. 42. 43. Michael L. Darland Forgiveness letter in April 2012. Google Removals and Correspondence.

44.Brian J. Dorsey Legal Correspondence re Case handling & Issues of Material facts. 45. Letter to Judge Cooper re lack of service September 24, 2011. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. Louis Leclezio Profile. Settlement Proposal. Copy Certified Mail to Judge Cooper. Letter to ITU re Internet control. Attorney Jim McBride confirms thirty minute hearing. Kittitas County Correspondence underscores the case.

4. TABLE OF U.S.A. AND INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES

References re: 1. Freedom of speech in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are almost always permitted. In Common Law it is usually a requirement that a reported alleged slander or alleged defamation claim be false. Note: All information I have published and will continue to disseminate about Michael L. Darland on the World Wide Web and thru all other available platforms, can be verified to be TRUE by documents under the long list of Authoritative Documents referred to above! IRONICAL STATEMENT FROM MICHAEL L. DARLAND TO THE PRESS: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017409373_superpacs03m.html What I hope they use it (Darlands $50,000 contribution to FreedomWorks) for is to find people and support people who believe as I do in following our Constitution," Darland said of his donation. (Emphasis added) He views Obama as holding a "derogatory" view toward constitutional limits on big government. Does Michael L. Darland Believe in following the Constitution, only when Free Speech does not embarrass him and does not expose him to the truth and likely prosecution? Thus, according to Michael L. Darland, who, selectively believes in following the Constitution no one located anywhere in the world has any right to criticize Michael L. Darland and expose him to the truth on the World Wide Web. But Michael L. Darland can criticize even the First American, President Obama!

Incidentally, Mr. Mark Randazza, a First Amendment law expert who is also an intellectual property lawyer and a law professor appears to be very familiar with the likes of Michael L. Darland. The latter used his money to deny me Free Speech after causing me irreparable damages for years. Mr. Randazza handled the Glenn Beck v. Isaac Eiland-Hall case. The following is what Mr. Randazza had to say commenting generally on the Darlands of this world: As my career has gone on, Ive seen that often wealthy and powerful people are awfully thin skinned about criticism, and they use their money and power to attempt to silence the little guy. However, when that happens, the guy who gets pushed over suffers, but so do all of us. When one citizens constitutional rights are threatened, all of our rights are threatened, and I am not letting that happen on my watch.

2. Freedom of Speech
(redirected from Freedom of Speech (International))

The Framers of the Constitution guaranteed freedom of speech and expression to the citizens of the United States with the First Amendment, which reads, in part, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech." Almost since the adoption of the Bill of Rights, however, the judiciary has **struggled to define speech and expression and the extent to which freedom of speech should be protected. Some, like Justice HUGO L. BLACK, have believed that freedom of speech is absolute. But most jurists, along with most U.S. citizens, agree with Justice OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES JR., who felt that the Constitution allows some restrictions on speech under certain circumstances. To illustrate this point, Holmes wrote, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic" ( SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).

3. THE OPEN INTERNET & THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Stop Washington from regulating Free Speech & Enterprise
FCC Regulation of the Internet We are not interested in you asserting your set of values, beliefs and agendas over yet another free form of information exchange and commerce. Federal regulators and non-elected bureaucrats were never supposed to control and regulate communication and information exchange. Nowhere in the US Constitution are they given any authority to control or regulate free speech, free enterprise or free information exchange. In fact, it actually sets forth prohibitions against this. Freedom is the choice of making good or bad decisions, its messy. Its not supposed to be controlled or molded by our government or its unelected regulators. Regulation of the internet will mean the media and the government will no longer have any truly free opinion exchange

of an opposing nature. It will hurt American business making us less competitive than we are already. It will hurt and stifle American citizens who disagree with current party or administration in control, regardless of which party it happens to be. Finally it will hurt America by continuing to regulate and restrain free speech and making us less free and less the America we once were. (Emphasis added) Fulton Sheen

4. TEN PRINCIPLES SHOULD AFFIRM THE PUBLICS RIGHT TO INFORMATION

http://freespeechdebate.com/en/?gclid=COGOyISu-68CFQdb3wod4xWKSw We are all neighbours now. Through the internet and mobile phones, we can reach four billion other people. This offers unprecedented chances for free expression. Timothy Garton Ash and an international team based at Oxford University

Invites the International Community To Come Together To write 10 principles for global free speech. Click. Discuss. Vote.
Sandra Coliver, senior legal officer at the Open Society Justice Initiative, says the right to information is essential for freedom of expression. Defamation laws cannot be used to stifle freedom of expression, people should never be convicted of defamation, if the statement was true, or an honest opinion published without malice, and/or if its publication was in the public interest. (emphasis added) A published statement or image cannot be defamatory unless it causes substantial harm to the reputation of the individual concerned. Defences against a charge of defamation should include: responsible publication on matters of public interest, truth (the statement must be shown to be substantially true) and honest opinion (an honest statement of opinion on a matter of public interest). Michael L. Darland offering encumbered property, as if it were free and clear of all encumbrances, to the public at large is indeed a matter of urgent public interest to all.

5. FREEDOM OF SPEECH INTERNATIONALLY REGULATING THE INTERNET WITHOUT DAMAGING FREE

SPEECH
By Media Policy Published on November 24, 2011

http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-withoutdamaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/
Finally, in the case of defamation, jurisdictional regulation must be clarified in the region to avoid uncertainty about applicable law, which could cause self-censorship. Criteria which grant jurisdiction to the authors location of residence could minimize negative effects on freedom of expression by guaranteeing the authors right of defense. (Emphasis added) In addition, free expression can be protected by adopting regulations that prohibit enforcement of foreign judgments contrary to international standards on freedom of expression. 5. EXCERPTS FROM OCTOBER 11, 2011 HEARING TRANSCRIPT + COMMENTS In the case of Louis Leclezio Family et al - Plaintiffs v. Michael & Myrna Darland Donors to FreedomWorks Defendants - The facts presented causing the alleged defamation claim were all TRUE AND EASILY VERIFIABLE through a long list of supporting documents readily available to the presiding Judge. Those documents are attached as exhibits under the section Authoritative Documents. **But, unlike the most respected and prominent Justices in America and law professors around the world, the small time Judge Michael E. Cooper from the small rural desert town of Ellensburg (Pop. 18,174 in 2010) **struggled with nothing. Judge Cooper granted an off the cuff order denying Louis Leclezio Free Speech in less than thirty minutes without trial or debate! (See Document # 50) Adding salt to the wound, within that half hour, Judge Cooper did grant an additional pre wrapped package, concerning other issues, saying to his home town crony, attorney Jeff Slothower: Its been my pleasure. (See Document # 26 P. 13 lines 21 & 22) Indeed, on October 11, 2011, whatever the home town attorney, Jeff Slothower, asked for, from the small town Judge Michael E. Cooper, Jeff Slothower got on behalf of his wealthy out of town client, Michael L. Darland! But, whatever my out of town and from the big Seattle/Redmond city attorney, James D. McBride asked from Judge Michael E. Cooper on my behalf from poor Africa Judge Cooper denied outright! (See Document # 26 P.3 lines 1 25; P.4 lines 1 8; P.7 lines 18 25.)

Yet, on October 11, 2011, Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower made a plethora of false representations to the Court, among which: J. Slothower: And that as a matter of law statements and internet postings about Mr. and Mrs. Darland by Leclezios are inflammatory. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 4 6) False: Is the truth inflammatory? Where is the evidence? Where is a single citation by Ellensburg attorney, Jeff Slothower, with reference to the alleged inflammatory posts? I defy Ellensburg attorney, Jeff Slothower to refer The International House of Congress and the US Senate to a single inflammatory September 25, 2008 and October 11, 2011 concerning Mrs. Myrna criticize and do expose Michael L. Darland to the truth for the greater am convinced that Michael L. Darland is a repeat criminal. Court of post by Darland. common Appeals, The me between My posts do good of all. I

Request for International injunction order against Free Speech: J. Slothower: Then paragraph five, I have entered their orders, imposes a permanent injunction against Mr. Leclezio asking for enjoining and restraining him from continued defamatory comments and internet postings, orders him to remove them, this language we believe will once provided with internet to internet search providers allows them to remove this. (See Document # 26 P. 12 lines 5 11) False: In Free America, under the American Constitution and Bill of Rights, should it be as simple as that for a small time judge from small town USA to deny Free Speech without any trial and due process to anyone anywhere in the world? Especially for such a judge in America, to do so to someone located in Africa! Can such any small time judge from any small town USA transcend International borders just because he appears to believe that he and America can control the Internet across the whole Free world? In fact, would that be tantamount to a Free America, through its Internet control, to deny Freedom of Speech at Americas sole discretion to anyone in the rest of the Free world? What? Is Judge Michael E. Cooper licensed to sit on a bench in the Supreme Court in the Sovereign Republic of Mauritius reported to be in Africa?

Is Judge Michael E. Cooper from small town America qualified and empowered to legislate in Mauritius and sanction Mauritian citizens? Note: All the posts at issue originated from the sovereign Republic of Mauritius reported in court to be in Africa, outside the borders of America. But, apparently, Judge Michael E. Cooper was so eager to please his home town crony, Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower, that Judge Cooper readily fell into the desert trap laid out for him by attorney Slothower. Judge Cooper was asked to sign just about any kind of order by attorney Slothower Judge Cooper obeyed meekly and signed with pleasure! (See Document # 26 P. 13 lines 21 22) Does anyone wonder why would any Judge sign such a momentous order without any trial and or debate, while affecting Free Speech across international frontiers with pleasure? (See Document # 26 P. 13 lines 21 22) J. Slothower: I find it amazing that counsel and Mr. Leclezio who have basically ignored, if not thumbed their noses at this Court order since April of this year (See Document # 26 P. 6 lines 5 8) False: My numerous mails and posts as well as the other statement of Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower below, belies Slothowers assertion above. J. Slothower: I think the courts well aware that Mr. Leclezio is a prolific E-Mail writer having sent the court, myself, Mr. McBride, and myself, anybody else who will listen (See Document 26 P.6 lines 18 21) That avowal by Slothower and my prolific writing proves overwhelmingly that I never ignored or thumbed my nose at any one, let alone the court. Could I help it, if, while sick in Africa and unable to travel to America, the clerk of Kittitas County Court, Judge Michael E. Cooper, attorney Jeff Slothower, Mr. James McBride and anybody else who all received E-Mails and Certified mails from me ignored me and thumbed their noses at me determined not to hear and/or answer to some embarrassing truths? (See Document 26 P. 6 lines 18 21 & Document # 51) Yet, all along I desperately wanted to be heard. I provided much hard evidence to back up my statements. The hard evidence was in the best interest of all. But, I systematically went unheard. What a horrible feeling while sick, to have the sentiment that your fate is being decided in abstentia behind your back, behind closed ears and closed doors.

No one wanted to hear me knocking and knocking again and no one wanted to open the door. No one cared about responding to my desperate screams for help from outside! The deathly silence increased my awful feeling that my fate was definitely being disposed of without me having any say. I was being hanged without trial! Although sick, I was not dead. I was simply unable to travel! Was that why no one wanted to hear me? Or is that the American way of protecting human rights? Kill someones case without trial while sick!!! I wrote! I wrote! And I wrote again and again. I phoned. I phoned and I phoned again and again. But, while I wrote and wrote again - All in America wrote me off systematically! Was that strictly discriminatory on the part of the court and lawyers in America? OR Was that because I am often proceedings to be from Africa? OR Was it rather, precisely, because my posts from Africa exposed Michael L. Darland, an American citizen and a major donor to FreedomWorks, to the truth and to possible criminal prosecution in America, that I had to be denied Free Speech and my posts had to be removed? Were the irrefutable documents, already on file within the Washington Sate Kittitas County Court system, too damning against Michael L. Darland for me to be allowed to point to them and bring them all out in the public limelight? OR Was it because if someone is from Africa, she/he is not entitled to a trial as a plaintiff in America? (After all, was Naffissatou Diallo granted the right to a trial by the New York Prosecuting Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.?) How can someone in/from Africa be denied Free Speech without trial by someone in Free America? reported in those Kittitas County Court

Are citizens of the Free world only allowed to be as Free as America will tolerate them to be on a case by case basis? Does Guantanamo set the American standard for all all over the world? OR Is that rather, as I would prefer to believe, only because a single small time despotic judge from small town America erred in his belief that his autocratic America can control the Internet and dictate the freedoms of all, all over the world? But, nonetheless, the rest of America still truly believes in human rights for all! Africa Issue Highlighted: J. Slothower: When he filed it he lived in Africa for a number of years. In fact, he went to Africa and was planning to go to Africa when the agreement was filed. (See Document # 26 P. 5 lines 11 13) Come on! Which is it Mr. Slothower? Was hammering Africa, Africa, Africa, 3 times within two short lines all it took for that discriminatory hammer to come down in your favor? Could I help it, if I had suffered from cancer for at least four years and needed to go from America to my home in Mauritius erroneously reported by Slothower to be in Africa, to get FREE health care because Michael L. Darland did not live up to any of his agreements with me? To serve Michael L. Darland and our common cause, did I have to choose between dying for the cause and/or abandoning my right to justice in order to live? Just because I am originally purported to be from Africa, am I not entitled to any form of justice in America although I have lived in America for 27 years? Although I have four American daughters and 17 American grand children, am I not entitled to be heard and to justice in America? What has been Americas culminating gift to me? A court order denying me justice and Free Speech strictly not to expose an American alleged repeat criminal to the truth and likely prosecution.

However, just like my attorney, James McBride was not allowed by Judge Michael E. Cooper to make a key declaration on October 11, 2011 in front of the said judge, I am equally no longer allowed to be heard through the Internet having been denied Free Speech by the arbitrary and capricious ruling of Judge Michael E. Cooper once he had vested himself with International legal powers empowering him to control the Internet. (See Document 26 P. 7 lines 23 25.) Again and again I ask and will ask: Why was I denied Free Speech? Are they all in Ellensburg, a predominantly white small American community town, too ashamed of their prejudices and flagrant discrimination against me, located supposedly in Africa? Therefore, the world should not and cannot read what I have to say! Indeed, according to a news report dated September 17, 2011, Judge Michael E. Cooper notified Washington State Governor Chris Gregoire and Washington State Supreme Court Chief Justice Barbara Madsen in August 2011 that he would retire from the bench as of October 1, 2011. If that were so, why was Judge Michael E. Cooper still around on the bench on October 11, 2011? Was it specifically to hand over his pre wrapped all encompassing present, for unknown reasons, to his hometown attorney crony, Jeff Slothower? Prior to reading that news report, I had relied solely on the closing statements of both Judge Michael E, Cooper and attorney Slothower, as reported in the transcript of the October 11, 2011 hearing. I was under the impression that the Judge was to retire at the end of October 2011.(See Document 26 P.13 lines 16 22) But was it because Judge Cooper had specifically come in to sit on the bench on October 11, 2011 to grant his very unusual parting gift to his home town crony on that date that the Judge signed as pro tem? Would the remark by attorney Jeff Slothower: And I realize this is the last time Ill appear in front of you. indicate that the judge would only come out of retirement once to act as Pro Tem for that very special gifting occasion? (See Document 26 P. 13 lines 17 & 18) If that is so, then throughout this Brief and the rest of the documents wherever I may have erred by making reference to pre retirement it should read: post retirement.

Does that make this whole grotesque and foul affair look even worse?

6. GOOGLE & FREE SPEECH:

GOOGLE: Vint Cerf: "The greatest strength of the current system of Internet governance is its meritocratic democracy. Anyone who cares can voice ideas and opinions, but the ultimate decisions are governed by broad consensus. It might not always be the most convenient of systems, but its the fairest, safest, and historically most effective way to ensure that good ideas win out and bad ideas die. Such a move holds profound and I believe potentially hazardous implications for the future of the Internet and all of its users. If all of us do not pay attention to what is going on, users worldwide will be at risk of losing the OPEN and FREE Internet that has brought so much to so many. Those are the words spoken by Mr. Vint Cerf who testified before a the Congressional subcommittee hearing on Thursday May 31, 2012 at the hearing on the Hill. In addition, in an op ed in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year, Federal Communications Commission member, Robert McDowell, also warned that some of the countries who belong to the ITU are interested in restraining the essential freedom of the Internet because it causes problems for dictatorships and autocracies. What? Does America want to remain the sole dictatorial and autocratic dictator of the Internet although the Internet is a global facility? OR To make matters even worse, should America empower any kind of an autocratic judge from any kind of a small USA town to dictate to the GLOBE what a world citizen can and cannot say and/or read! Are actions taken by Google in line with the representations of Mr. Vint Cerf at that hearing and the statements of Mr. Robert McDowell in the Wall Street Journal? Check out: www.snocadia.blogspot.com and/or www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com All it took for Google to remove both blogs referred to above was not a Federal Court or Supreme Court ruling. But any kind of an order issued by a small time home town judge from the desert town of Ellensburg (Pop.18,174 in 2010). That order affecting Free Speech globally was delivered without trial, in a pre wrapped package that included a number of other issues at the end of a hearing that had lasted a maximum of thirty minutes! (See Document # 50) From a transcript of the hearing held on October 11, 2011, it appears that such a momentous order was hastily delivered based solely on the following unverified statements by small home town attorney crony Jeff Slothower: Jeff Slothower: And that as a matter of law statements and internet postings about Mr. and Mrs. Darland by Leclezios are inflammatory. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 4 6)

J. Slothower: Then paragraph five, I have entered their orders, imposes a permanent injunction against Mr. Leclezio asking for enjoining and restraining him from continued defamatory comments and internet postings, orders him to remove them, this language we believe will once provided with internet to internet search providers allows them to remove this. (See Document # 26 P. 12 lines 5 11) Apparently, when and while the Internet is under US control, that is all it takes for any kind of an American judge to deny Free Speech to any world citizen!!! (See Document # 43) I could not have ever imagined that! I could not travel. I was home bound in supposedly Africa for health and financial reasons. I was comforted and I was encouraged by Googles mission statement on the Google site. It reads:

Googles mission is to organize the worlds information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Granted, I could not travel. But, I rejoiced that, thanks to Google, my words can and will travel far and wide. I will be heard. Justice will be served for the greater good of all. I posted on Blogger. I uploaded supporting documents on Scribd. Finally, I was heard loud and clear! Unfortunately my written words made too much unsettling noise for the liking of Michael L. Darland, Judge Michael E. Cooper, attorneys Douglas W. Nicholson and Jeff Slothower. From Africa, my words had suddenly travelled too far and too fast on the magic Google platform to too many ports of entry throughout the world. Now, that they were finally reading me in America, because they knew others were also reading me around the world, it could not and would not be for long. Because the US folks had heard me, the rest of the world should no longer be allowed to hear me! Being exposed to the whole world and to the light of the truth from dark Africa was something Michael L. Darland had obviously not banked on when he set out to defraud me. Did Darland fear that my words might end up berthing at the wrong ports of entry on the international stage and in Washington DC?

Ironically, as mentioned above, that momentous ruling denying me Free Speech, potentially affecting the rights of all around the world, to easily accessible, Free Impartial Information, was dictated to the mighty Google Empire by a small time Judge from small town USA without trial within less than half an hour. Yet, thats all it took for Google to be bamboozled and for its Mission Statement jeopardized. How exactly safe and Free is the global Internet under US control? However, with or without Google, my words will continue to arrive at all world ports including Geneva and Washington DC. Wherever my words berth, hopefully they will give birth to new laws to protect Free Speech and to make Free and complete impartial information accessible for all, across all the frontiers of a global world. How much better could the UN control the global Internet? Would the UN have wanted to verify at least before trusting a home town crony? How genuine can the Google Mission Statement really be if and when Google can deny Free Speech so easily to a world citizen? If and when, in real life, the mighty Google empire can be ridiculed any how by any small time Judge from any small town in America? And the Google Mission Statement and the words of Mr. Vint Cerf can become so meaningless. Just because any kind of a judge from any kind of small town for any kind of obscure reason, anyhow so ruled! (See Document # 43 Googles Notices and my comments speak for themselves.) Should Google be concerned? Apparently not! I received NO reply from Google to my comments! Is Google NOT concerned because the Internet is under crony US control? Since Google is apparently as little concerned about Justice towards world citizens, as the small town judge is, in a global world, should Internet Control definitely pass from the US to the UN for the greater good of all. Is it not clear that Google does not walk the talk? If Mr. Cerf actually meant what he told the Congressional subcommittee hearing on Thursday May 31, 2012, then: Again I ask: Is it because I am from the tiny Republic of Mauritius supposedly in Africa, that I do not deserve Free Speech and an answer to my complaints from Google?

Am I not entitled to due process? Do I not rate an explanation or an apology? Should Google not verify the facts and reinstate my blogs after compensating me for the damages I have suffered through their arbitrary and capricious one sided decision? Should Google not show the same degree of responsibility towards all world citizens since Google collects revenues world wide? Again I ask: How much worse could the UN control of the Internet be? Has Google stuck its head in the sand simply because a small time judge from small town USA has decreed that I should have no voice and the world should have no right to impartial information? Is limiting the world audience to one side of any story, what Mr. Vint Cerf considers being the fairest, safest, and historically most effective way to ensure that good ideas win out and bad ideas die. Is that what Mr. Vint Cerf calls: the OPEN and FREE Internet that has brought so much to so many. If the above were true In my case what has happened to that unwavering colossal global advocate and defender of Free Speech in China? How much more could the Internet bring if it were controlled by the UN? Does Google and Mr. Cerf only speak to impress the gallery? Does GOOGLE believe that: In America, Free Speech from Africa I s NOT A MUST if it disturbs the ruling wealthy? BUT: In China, Free Speech Government! IS A MUST to disturb the ruling Chinese

Is it not a wonder, how that small time, pro tem Judge from that small town in America could achieve during a marathon hearing, in less than thirty minutes, through an off the cuff order, what China failed to do over months? That is to force Google, without trial or due process, to cower down docilely and to allow itself to be muzzled up as far as my International right to Free Speech through the Google platform is concerned while automatically compromising the availability of impartial information accessible to all through the Google platform.

Considering the above fact, how ambiguous and contradictory are Google policies?

Should Google not have one and the same policy towards all to, meet its global objectives fairly and in line with its Mission Statement? Since Googles actions in my case reflect otherwise:

Isnt it high time for the UNITED NATIONS, an impartial world organization, to take over control of the Internet from the US? The UN could then approve new LEGISLATION to impartially govern Freedom of Speech for the benefit of all world citizens, and not just Americans, on the world wide Internet? Otherwise, how does anyone from Africa, or anywhere else in the world, manage to access the US court of any potentially biased Judge in America in order to protect and defend his/her sacred rights to Free Speech and obtain redress? If and when, as in this case, at any time, anyhow, any why from any small town in America, any kind of a Judge can arbitrarily and capriciously deny anyone anywhere in the world: Free Speech and Free access to impartial information! Additionally, is it discriminatory against the less fortunate and against foreigners outside America if Google elects to remove certain content only upon receipt of a US issued Court order only? Are not such Court orders prohibitively expensive to obtain in the US? And are they not virtually impossible to attain by

a foreigner from outside America. Then, is the Google policy of removing content only upon receipt of an American issued court order discriminatory and only designed for the sole benefit of the wealthy American citizen? Is that what Mr. Vint Cerf calls: the fairest, safest, and historically most effective way to ensure that good ideas win out and bad ideas die. While Google earns income from all over the world, is that a good or bad idea? Once the International Court of Appeals, the US House of Congress, the US Senate and the global public rules that it is a bad idea for Google to have a discriminatory policy that favors rich American citizens at the expense of the rest of the world Then Internet control MUST be surrendered by the US to the UN. The whole world should pray that Santa Clausattends the WCIT 2012 in Dubai in December. From there, may Santa be sent to deliver a truly FREE Internet around the globe. What a juggernaut Christmas present that will be for ALL Internautes!

7. MAIN STREET MATTERS

QUESTIONS JURORS, CONGRESS AND THE SENATE MIGHT ASK: Before Google elected to submit passively and obediently to such an apparently ill thought, off the cuff ruling from a small time Judge from small town America without a trial; Before Judge Michael E. Cooper chose to deny me the right to Free Speech outside his jurisdictional boundaries across international frontiers through an arbitrary and off the cuff, ruling, should the Judge have at the very least tried the case, debated and researched expert opinion and precedent case law, if any, with respect to the following: 1. What are the jurisdictional boundaries of Judge Michael E. Cooper with regards to International rights to Free Speech? 2. What was my main purpose for disseminating truthful information well backed up by supporting documents concerning Michael L. Darland? 3. What are the likely consequences of denying Free Speech to a responsible world citizen alerting the public about an alleged repeat criminal likely to strike again and again? 4. Could such an order denying me Free Speech in the interest of the common good of all be construed by an alleged repeat criminal as a free license to go on committing crime? Can the entire October 11, 2011 hearing in small town USA in front of Judge Michael E. Cooper ever be considered to be a well thought out fair and just hearing in America? If that is so - Does America have any right to point a finger at any other country in the world? Does America have the right to accuse other countries of holding unfair trials and of not respecting human rights? Is imposing further unwarranted trials on me without granting me the right to any trial whatsoever, how justice works in America towards purported Africans, especially, when sick and downtrodden? Court Rules - Appeal Rights Human Rights: The International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and the US Senate will please note that on October 11, 2011, attorney Jeff Slothower stated to the court:

I believe the court should make in an order to comply with CR 54 and there be no just reason

for delay, which would require Mr. Leclezio to appeal this matter within the 30 day period from today. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 15 19)
And then again, Jeff Slothower stated: So, your Honor, with entry of that order, its my understanding if I need to serve Mr. Leclezio in the future I can simply deposit a copy with the clerk? Judge Michael E. Cooper: Right. Pursuant to Court rule. (See Document # 26 P. 13 lines 11 15) How convenient can that small Ellensburg rural Court exactly make it for itself to, within minutes, deny me a trial, deny me my rights to my property, deny me the right to free speech and to crown it all deny me the right to be informed thru adequqte and proper legal service! And to, arbitrarily decide to do so even though the Court actually has had my physical and my e-mail addresses on file for a long time? While attorney Slothower claimed that I had 30 days to appeal, Judge Michael E. Cooper, and attorney Jeff Slothower made sure that they would NOT have the court serve the diktats of Judge Cooper served on me - EVER! Jeff Slothower: So, Your honor, with entry of that order, then its my understanding if I need to serve Mr. Leclezio in the future I can simply deposit a copy with the clerk! Judge Cooper: Right, pursuant to Court rule. (See Document 26 P.13 lines 11 15) Although both the court and attorney Slothower had my home address on file and in spite of me addressing a specific letter to the court and to Jeff Slothower on September 24, 2011 asking to be served hard copies of all relevant papers! (See Documents # 45 & 48) Excerpt from September 24, 2011 letter addressed to Judge Cooper et al:

Dear most Honorable Judge Cooper, Would you please issue an order that all documents produced or filed with the Court in this case since December 21, 2010 be made available to me in due form before this case can proceed. I could only open the small 30.6 KB doc attached by McBride as my slow dial up connection does not allow me to open the 13.5 MB file also attached among others. Furthermore, we have the legal right to be served all papers in due and readily readable form and Slothower has the legal duty to serve me personally in legal

and due form the documents pertaining to his proposed October hearing before that hearing can be held. In the absence of a legal representative in America at present, I will accept service by certified mail. (emphasis added) I will be back at my usual home address: Louis Leclezio, Allee Tamarin, Rodrigues Island via The Republic of Mauritius on or about January 31, 2012. (See Documents # 45 & 48 Letter to Judge Cooper re Lack of service & my certified mail receipt.)
I defy that rural court or anyone else to produce any receipt for any kind of mail the court or anyone else might have sent to me in answer to my request dated September 24, 2011. (See document # 48 My Certified Mail Receipt of Letter sent to Judge Cooper) Before that rural court tries to absolve itself by claiming that it could not afford the postage, the court should consider how much more it pays out in messenger fees to serve American citizens across America. It is important for me to point out that I received the transcript of the October 11, 2011 hearing thanks to Google acting as messenger for the Kittitas County Court on April 20, 2012 only. I am not an attorney. I am sick. But I assume my responsibilities nonetheless. Therefore, through sheer ardent desire for a fair trial and to see justice finally prevail, I have mustered all of the little strength that I have left to put together this trial brief within approximately 50 days! My prolific writing should attest to the fact that it has never been in my nature to ignore anything or to thumb my nose at anyone. From the cradle, I have been taught to assume my responsibilities. I am still at the disposal of anyone and all to answer any further questions. Furthermore, depending on the ups and downs of my health, I am available for video conferences through iPad at short notice. In order to describe your interest in this case and/or to set up an appointment please kindly email: leclezio@hotmail.com I acknowledge that I am not an attorney. If an attorney, well versed in international Free Speech laws is interested in preparing an additional professional brief to be presented to other forums of choice, I would welcome discussing the opportunity.

I further acknowledge that I may be fifteen days or so late in filing this appeal. From April 20, 2012 when I received the transcript of the October 11, 2011 hearing to date, 50 days have elapsed. I hope and pray that the International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and the US Senate will show some compassion and consideration towards me for not having been able to file this appeal within the 30 days mentioned and set by the Court and attorney Slothower. Both, conveniently, never gave me the opportunity to respond in due time. Additionally, please note that according to Jewel Smith, the Kittitas County Court reporter, the transcript of the hearing was only completed on January 3, 2012. That is 84 days after the October 11, 2011 hearing! In turn that transcript was only served upon me on April 20, 2012 by Google acting as Kittitas County Court messenger. That is 190 days after the October 11, 2011 hearing. Yet I was supposed to have 30 days only from October 11, 2011 to appeal a decision indirectly made known to me a full 190 days later! (See Document # 26 P.14 line 10) In mitigation for granting me some additional time, will the International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and the US Senate please consider that I have undergone three cancer related surgeries since March 14, 2006. The latest being on March 30, 2012. I have had chemo therapy treatment ending in July 2006 and began suffering from heart problems since October 2006. I have been taking Cordarone and Warfarin since a stay in ICU in April 2009. Since May 18, 2012, I am on Vastarel and Stemetil to control acute vertigo problems caused by cancer related ear surgery on March 30, 2012. It has definitely not been easy putting this Trial Brief together within such a short time starting from April 20, 2012 only twenty days after my latest surgery during my convalescence. But may it testify to my determination, my perseverance and my conviction that justice needs to prevail for the better good of all in this case.

8. INTERNATIONAL AND WASHINGTON STATE LAW PROVISIONS Under International and Washington State laws, are perjury, fraud, coercion, corruption, tampering with witnesses, suppression of Free Speech, intimidation and blackmail considered crimes?

Are

such

crimes

punishable

by

law

internationally

and

in

Washington

State?

Under the list of Authoritative Documents, are documents # 5 - # 6 - # 6a # 9 - # 11 - # 12 - # 12a - # 20 - # 22 - # 23 - # 26 - # in case # 04 2 00411 2 still on file and of Public record in Kittitas County Superior Court? OR Has the file in case # 04 2 00411 2 in Kittitas County Superior Court also been conveniently sealed since the October 11, 2011 hearing, just like the docket in King County Superior Court in the case against Michael L. Darland personally and Digital Systems involving allegations of fraud was sealed in 1993 as a condition of an $8 million settlement being reached by Michael L. Darland allegedly to avoid being charged criminally? OR Has the entire file in case # 04 2 00411 2 in Kittitas County Superior Court or have documents therein magically disappeared through Orders from Judge Michael E. Cooper after retiring or otherwise? On the other hand, if all above mentioned documents are still of public record, is the Kittitas County Public Prosecutor not duty bound to look through the files in case # 04 2 00411 2, to locate the appropriate documents mentioned throughout this Trial Brief, where perjury, coercion and fraud are glaringly evident and to file the appropriate charges against all those who have committed such crimes or served as accomplices thereto? Are officers of the law also punishable under International law and the laws of Washington State, if they are found to have aided, abated and/or tacitly or otherwise participated in perjury, coercion and corruption leading to defrauding an individual of his right to Free Speech, his right to his property, his right to timely legal service as requested, his right to a fair trial, and his right to Justice? If and when a Public Prosecutor is made aware of crimes committed within his jurisdiction, is the Public Prosecutor duty bound to investigate all such crimes reported to him? Especially so, when the said crimes can easily be verified through the County Courts public records? OR Should the Public Prosecutor ignore such reports and put the public at risk by allowing an alleged repeat criminal, Michael L. Darland, to go on committing more crimes involving more perjury, more coercion, more corruption, more intimidation, more blackmail and more fraud to the detriment of the general public?

9. PLEADINGS The Louis Leclezio Family et al respectfully asks THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF APPEALS, The HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND THE US SENATE TO DECLARE: 1. That Freedom of Speech is sacred for all around the globe regardless of color, creed or origin. 2. That Freedom of Speech cannot be denied to someone residing in Africa in a discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious manner without trial or due process by any Judge located anywhere in the United States of America. 3. That Freedom of Speech policies cannot be dictated to Internet Servers all over the globe by any small time judge, Michael E, Cooper, from any small town, Ellensburg, (Pop. 18,174 in 2010) in this instance, lost somewhere in the Eastern Washington desert of the United States of America. 4. That a small time Judge from Small Town, America, cannot privilege the right of American citizens to unwarranted protection while such American citizens irreparably damage others in the world by denying them their sacred right to expose their side of the story. 5. That Freedom of Speech cannot be considered sacred by America and Google in the case of China, but be desecrated by America and Google in other parts of the Free World Republic of Mauritius Africa in this case. 6. That the U.S. Congress and Senate be therefore asked to review and revise U.S. laws regarding the global governance of Internet Search Engines. Jurisdictional regulations must be clarified regarding all regions to avoid uncertainty about applicable law, which could cause self-censorship. 7. That small time U.S. Judges from any Small Town, U.S.A. should not be allowed to discriminate and affect the right of any individual to Free Speech and to impartial information internationally regardless of color, creed or origin. 8. That, per all hard evidence contained in the long list of authoritative documents, Michael L. Darland and any and all of his accomplices were at no time defamed since all the information disseminated by Louis Leclezio could easily be verified to be true and factual. And such information was disseminated for the greater good of all. 9. That Michael L. Darland and his accomplices, if any, be found guilty of perjury, fraud, coercion, intimidation and blackmail and that Michael L. Darland and his accomplices, if any, be charged accordingly in the public interest. 10.That Michael L. and Myrna Darland owe and must deliver, as agreed, to Louis Leclezio, the 26 acres that Leclezio bargained for as consideration and in exchange to assign to the Darlands for $750,000 only his interest in the balance of the 76 acre Snocadia property together with a $492,781.37 value (at cost) paid in assessments by Leclezio and Miller for water and sewer hook ups and in addition a standing timber value worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. The combined property value of the Leclezio and Darland 76 acre property was estimated by Darland on October 24, 2005 at between $23 million and $92 million! (See Doc. # 19) 11.That Ellensburg attorney Douglas W. Nicholson be found to have been thoroughly unethical in preferring one client over another and to have also made false statements

in various e-mails. That attorney, Douglas Warr Nicholson, be therefore judged unfit to practice law and also liable vis--vis Leclezio for irreparable damages suffered by Leclezio due to attorney Nicholson abusing his position of trust. (See Documents #s 10 14 18 21 to name but a few.)

10. CONCLUSION All of the equities in this case favor plaintiffs and the facts established at trial will hopefully convince the International Court of Appeals to enter a just, fair and equitable finding in favor of plaintiffs as allowed by law. May the House of Congress and the US Senate enact urgent laws to protect the humanitarian rights of all, all over the world to Free Speech and freely accessible impartial information.

REFERENCES: 11. EXCERPTS FROM A FEW PAST POSTS

2 nd www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post April 9, 2011 Title: Open letter from Louis Leclezio to Snoqualmie Pass Utility District re Michael L. Darland.
This post deserves to be read in its entirety. It tells part of the story.

Indeed, I believe that due to the compelling and uncontroverted hard evidence, charges of corruption, fraud and perjury against Michael L. Darland will stick. Note that in 2007 Darland was offering to the public encumbered land for sale which he did not own free and clear and could not have delivered. At any and all cost, the truth deserves to be widespread in order to safeguard the welfare of all. If I succeed to prevent Michael L. Darland from defrauding, corrupting & ruining just one more person, my efforts and my courageous violation of a restraining order sought by Darland to help conceal the truth about him will all have been well worth it regardless of any personal cost to me. To all parties concerned, I hope you find this Brief helpful in your dealings with Michael L. Darland. Yours truly, Louis Leclezio.

3 rd . www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post April 25, 2011 Title: Michael L. Darland,

(aka Mike Darland) Bellevue, Washington State: Alleged perjury & coercion 1993 Perjury January 2005? Fraud beginning in October 2007 Coercion August 2009 Perjury August 2010! Answer to his TRO Motion Addressed to: The Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper, Jim McBride, Jeff Slothower, Douglas W. Nicholson Ellensburg Attorney. Yet, the overwhelming, compelling and glaring evidence in support of the veracity of all information disseminated by me concerning criminal acts committed by Michael L. Darland can be confirmed after a thorough examination of the Exhibits that can be found on my http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/ dated April 9, 2011. Let the evidence speak for itself. If, through my courageous dissemination of the truth about Michael L. Darland, I succeed to prevent Michael L. Darland from defrauding, corrupting & ruining just one more persons life, my efforts should an ill advised restraining order, ever be granted, will have been well worth it regardless of any personal cost to me. (emphasis added) Judge Michael E. Cooper should seriously consider granting me a Permanent Order to go on disseminating such valuable, factual and truthful information to the public at large for the common good of ALL.

4 th . www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post July 24, 2011 Title: Michael L. Darland, Bellevue, WA. sets himself up to add another failure to his already impressive list of failures.
A desperate Michael L. Darland is now looking to the Court to deprive the public of the benefits of the truth. My response is addressed to: The most Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper Kittitas County Superior Court and relevant parties. In 1993 Mike Darland was sued for fraudulently inflating the stock price of Digital Systems Inc. of Redmond, WA. As the case evolved, Michael L Darland set himself up to face additional personal charges of

perjury, coercion and corruption. Be it as it may, Darland, through his attorney Slothower, is again resorting to another means of muzzling me up and concealing the truth from the public. The harder it is to argue the truth away, the more so, the general public has a right to know so as to be protected from the likes of such dangerous repeat criminals. In a country where foreigners, especially from Africa, are becoming increasingly used to see some lawyers auctioning their conscience to the highest bidder In a justice system where enough money can supposedly whitewash any criminal In a country where perverted attorneys can either get cases dismissed by Judges or public prosecutors at their clients attorneys whim In a country where money serves to turn victims into criminals against whom sanctions can be obtained ad lib to conceal the truth, nothing should come as a surprise. As I have already stated previously, if my posts can help but one person not to be defrauded by Michael L. Darland of Bellevue WA., they will have been well worth it regardless of the personal cost.

6 th . www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post August 5, 2011 Title: To: Jeff

Slothower - Re: Michael L. Darland - Bellevue WA. On April 28, 2011, you wrote a letter to Jim McBride. In your letter you state: For your information, we became aware of the blogspot in the middle of last week when Mr. Darland attended a business meeting with individuals he did not have an existing relationship with, who indicated they had googled him and the first thing that came up was the Snocadia blogspot. Please refer to my mail to you where I specifically provided you with the address of my blog on April 25, 2011. In that mail I referred you to my blog no less than 4 times! I fail to understand why you would pretend to the Court that you only became aware of the blogspot in the middle of last week when Mr. Darland attended a business meeting? However I was delighted to learn that my blog is benefiting society at large.

If my dissemination of the truth about your client, Michael L. Darland aka Mike Darland of Bellevue WA. has served to help but one person from being defrauded over time by Michael L. Darland, my efforts will have been well worth it. My Comment in May 2012: The same, main objective of my posts is often repeated and very pointed over months. The information I disseminated and will continue to publish about Michael L. Darland is true. The statements can be easily verified. The purpose is for the greater good of all. I wish someone had warned me about that rascal before I met him. May my continued truthful posts save many more from Michael L. Dalands ruthless clutches. For, only if If Instead of the Court docket being sealed from public view in exchange for $8 million (eight million dollars) plundered from corporate coffers by Michael L. Darland, Michael L. Darland had been sent to jail for fraud, perjury, coercion and corruption in 1993, Michael L. Darland could not have defrauded again.

7 th . www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post August 6, 2011 Title: Michael L. Darland - Contempt of Court.

It is addressed to: The most Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper Kittitas County Superior Court. Jeff Slothower of Lathrop, Winbauer, Harel, Slothower & Denison LLP. of Ellensburg, WA. Jim McBride of Julin & McBride Redmond WA. Brian J. Dorsey of Snohomish County Public Prosecutors office. Douglas Warren Nicholson, Ellensburg attorney. Dan Mallove, Attorney for Snoqualmie Pass Utility District. Myrna Darland Michael L. Darlands e-mail address is unknown. The above post is well worth reading in its entirety. It presents and confirms what is the whole case about. See Posts Section All posts are in chronological order.

8 th . www.snocadia.blogspot.com Post August 20, 2011 Title: Judge Michael

E. Cooper - Kittitas County Superior Court - Re: Michael L. Darland Bellevue Sent Via Registered International Mail and Sent VIA e-mail: Dear Honorable Judge Cooper, Case #: 04 2 00411 2 Michael L. Darland proposed to file pleadings on July 25, 2011 asking the Kittitas County Superior Court to find me in Contempt of Court. What was the outcome of those pleadings if ever filed? If not Why not? My comment in May 2012: I received NO answer. In copies of those pleadings sent to me, one grief held against me is to be allegedly from Africa. If that were true, let my Cry from my Beloved Country be heard by the Judge Michael E. Cooper. Let the Kittitas County Superior Court not discriminate against me just because I am alleged to be from Africa. I am forced to live temporarily away from the US because in my country, the Republic of Mauritius, health care and all medication is totally free. Michael L. Darland knows this fully well. Darland has contacted me numerous times in Mauritius. Using my temporary forced absence, as yet another vile opportunistic ploy to delay/deny me justice, Michael L. Darland is now proposing to depose me on August 29, 2011. My comment in May 2012: Are all those letters addressed to Judge Michael E. Cooper from someone who is sick, but nonetheless makes the effort to communicate with the Court, and all relevant parties, indicative of someone who ignores and thumbs his nose at the Court as Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower would falsely represent to the Court on October 11, 2011? (See Document # 26 P.6 lines 5 -7) OR Was it the other way round? Were Judge Michael E. Cooper and all relevant parties ignoring and thumbing their noses at me? Was it by concerted design and strictly for selfish reasons of their own? Buyer Beware of predator, Michael L. Darland.

The exhibits below as well as contradictory statements made under penalty of perjury filed by Michael L. Darland with the Kittitas County Superior Court and the WSBA establish beyond any doubt that Michael L Darland is a repeat criminal. This entire case should be referred to the Kittitas County Prosecutors office. (May 2012 addition: Obviously in the publics best interest.) The above are excerpts from my www.snocadia.blogspot.com between April 9, 2011 and August 20, 2011 prior to Judge Michael E. Cooper ordering on October 11, 2011 that all my posts, pictures and intellectual property be removed by Google! On October 11, 2011, Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower had represented to Judge Michael E. Cooper that my posts were inflammatory! Unfortunately, to my knowledge, attorney Slothower failed to cite a single inflammatory example. Apparently, he did not have to. The post retirement, pre wrapped gift package from Judge Cooper had apparently been pre arranged to be delivered by pro tem Judge Michael E. Cooper with pleasure. After I was notified by Google acting as messenger for Kittitas County Superior Court that my www.snocadia.blogspot.com site had been removed, I began posting under www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com . But that site would also be removed within days! The following are a few excerpts from my posts under www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com : 1 st . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 21, 2012 Title: Why Is Michael L. Darland aka Mike Darland (Bellevue, WA.) so desperate to urgently conceal the truth? Is Michael L. Darland so ashamed of his crimes that he cannot afford to see any documents establishing the truth being published? All documents below tell the TRUE facts. Were those documents too embarrassing also for retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper and for attorney Douglas W. Nicholson who ended up moving from his old firm to the law firm of Jeff Slothowers who was acting as a smoke screen for Douglas Warr Nicholson? Guess what? Original Documents + others supporting the truth are back on line. Interested parties should copy documents of interest promptly before Michael L. Darland has them removed so he can go on living his lies. Darland, obviously cannot afford that my side of the story be made public!

The TRUTH must be made known and must prevail at any and all cost. Ultimately here on earth or for eternity above The TRUTH WILL WIN!

2 nd . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post Believed to be also April 21, 2012 Title: Michael L. Darland 'glories' in his 'victory'... My suspicions that Jim McBride was overwhelmed dealing with all of Brians files and eventually had to withdraw from the case have been confirmed by Google acting as Kittitas County Court Messenger and attaching a copy of the Court proceedings dated October 11, 2011 to me only yesterday, April 20,2012. The well documented evidence published on www.snocadia.blogspot.com was far to damning for Michael L. Darland, the retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper and attorney Douglas W. Nicholson to have to live with it! The removal of my blog www.snocadia.blogspot.com is a filthy hoax perpetrated on the public. One that grants Michael L. Darland a license to go on defrauding people unpunished! What a black eye for the retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper of Kittitas County Superior Court only days before stepping down from the bench after a long carrier! If there is any semblance of Justice and Truth left out there in North America, I demand, from Africa, that my www.snocadia.blogspot.com be reinstated immediately so the whole world can be Judge. It is only if and when Darland succeeds to kill me that the public at large will stop seeing my posts about criminal Michael L. Darland reappearing to safeguard others from being defrauded by that repeat criminal.

3 rd . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 24, 2012 Title: Isn't it

Interesting how FreedomWorks in America for Michael L. Darland & Google On September 23, 2008, I started publishing a blog www.snocadia.blogspot.com. I have invested much time developing intellectual property including precious photos, creating articles and attaching those photos to the articles published on that blog. On April 19, 2012, Google advised me that they had arbitrarily removed my blog pursuant to a court order.

Note that all the documents that I had posted on Scribd and had provided links to, were also arbitrarily removed by Google, although many of those documents are already of public record in Kittitas County Superior Court. Does such removal by Google raise another more interesting question? Since All my posts originated from the Sovereign Island of Mauritius would Google feel compelled to reinstate my blog pursuant to a Court order issued, not by a small time, small US country town (population 18,174) judge Michael E. Cooper of Kittitas County Court but issued by the Chief Judge of Mauritius? Note that the Chief Judge of Mauritius has met Presidents from China, Asia, Europe and Africa and he is widely respected worldwide. Should Google then fail to immediately reinstate my blog www.snocadia.blogspot.com ,does that mean that Google believes it can position itself to service and earn income from countries around the world, but arbitrarily decide to allow itself to be dictated upon by any kind of a ruling from any kind of a Judge from any kind of a small US town? Should such a made to order order by Judge Michal E. Cooper be allowed to affect the rights of Americans and those of the whole world to know and to judge where the Truth lies? In a fairly informed world, I am prepared to pit my information against Michael L. Darlands fiction films any time anywhere. But, is it fair to the rest of the world to restrict FREE SPEECH to Michael L. Darland while locking my truths away and denying the public the right to know and to judge? Is that how FreedomWorks? And works for whom in America? Does freedom of speech only work for those who, like Mike Darland have donated $50,000 to FreedomWorks? No thanks, to Judge Michael E. Cooper if the American public cannot be cautioned through a number of Buyer Beware articles and judge for itself where the truth lies. Apparently, on the one hand Google wants to operate and collect global revenues, including from fast expanding Africa But on the other hand, someone posting from Africa does not rate either a reply from Google or his sacred right to Free Speech respected by Google!

4 th . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 25, 2012 Title: Google

Policy re Michael L. Darland But I am a stickler for fairness, Truth and Justice. I will fight to the death for the above. However, having undergone my 3rd surgery, in six years, I am not healthy enough yet to come to the US to fight Darland. In a universal world, in My country, Mauritius, My people do not expect me to be muted out by a small time judge, Michael E. Cooper from a small country town, Ellensburg, population 18,174 in 2010. Is that fair? Is that how Google lives up to its mission statement as stated above? Is fast expanding Africa only a part of Googles universe when convenient to make money? Does the Google board have the power to over rule such a small time, small US town judge for the greater benefit of Google and that of the rest of the world?

5 th . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 28, 2012 Title: Wow!

Myrna Darland, wife of Michael L. Darland donated $50,000 to FreedomWorks Washington State. Obviously Pride came first. Unfortunately, too often, vanity is followed by agonizing disgrace. How can FreedomWorks possibly work when Michael L. Darland is compelled to restrict Free Speech to his side of the story by any and all means? Understandably, well founded Free Speech becomes intolerable when shame is a direct consequence thereof. On the other hand, serenity, peace and wisdom are the enduring rewards of the prayerful and humble. Honest men are naturally free and happy thru virtuous conduct. Treacherous men are imprisoned by their own dishonest desires. Greed and money obsession leads to all kinds of crippling and tormenting evil.

The God given crown of the virtuous in their old age is their childrens children.
(Lord, thank you for spoiling me with 5 children and 23 grandchildren while 1 more is on the way!)

Now, if Darland is truly convinced that he did nothing wrong, then he should allow himself to be exposed to the truth contained in the documents I keep re-posting on the web each time Darland has them hacked in or removed. While relentlessly continuing to expose Michael L. Darland to the truth we will pray for peace and justice to eventually set him free thru repentance and facing that same TRUTH. It is also shameful that Michael L. Darland, with so much financial wealth chooses to spend so much time and so much money feeding lawyers fighting to defend his lies. In so doing, Michael L. Darland underscores the saying: Truth hurts

6 th . www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 30 , 2012 Title: What

is a Notarized Affidavit from William Popp of William Popp and Associates worth? Mike rarely admits he was wrong about anything. In all fairness, it should be noted that Michael L. Darland is no stranger at coercing false Affidavits from his star witnesses. Isn't that why Michael L. Darland insisted that the files in the fraud case against Michael L. Darland personally and Digital Systems (1993) be sealed in King County Superior Court as part of an $8 million dollar settlement by Darland? Now I ask my blog readers: What is your opinion? After considering the Notarized Affidavit of William Popp, the manner in which the one party, one way hearing was conducted and what a fool Michael L. Darland made of retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper, is it a wonder that none of them ever want to be shamed now by the facts published all over the web about this scandalous and outright immoral case in front of such a Kangaroo court? Is it a wonder that Judge Cooper granted a hurried cease and desist order requesting that Google, Blogger and Scribd remove all public information and documents affecting the credibility of Judge Michael E. Cooper and his cronies, attorneys Douglas Nicholson & Jeff Slothower of Ellensburg? Ironically On April 3, 2012, Michael L. Darland wrote to me a Forgiveness letter in effect more designed to intimidate and blackmail me into silence than to forgive. In his

Forgiveness letter with a new twist, Darland asserts: There is nothing that you can write or say that would cause anyone who knows me and my family that would ever cause them to believe your words. So all of the untruths that you write about me you write to effect future judgments of you by your maker.(See Document # 42 P. 5) Yet, by April 20, 2012 Darland had seen to it that my right to Free Speech through the Google international platform had been denied and all my posts exposing Michael L. Darland to the truth had been removed! Even two posts on my www.lleclezio.blogspot.com blog, dating as far back as November 9, 2008 and May 30, 2011, had to be also removed. The May 30, 2011 article was published on www.lleclezio.blogspot.com by me, a loving grand pa, on the occasion of my first grand daughter graduating from high school. According to Michael L. Darland, that article had to be torn down on May 1, 2012 by Google acting on Darlands instructions. Yet, that article had made my first grand child, one of 23, shed tears of joy as Kaitlyn called to thank me profusely. But apparently that same article made Michael L. Darland cry tears of anger because it cast him for who he truly is. In that article I wrote: I wish I were there to see you graduate. A quick visit to my blog: www.snocadia.blogspot.com will instantly reveal how I have done my utmost to obtain justice and redress in time to be financially able to be by your side, regardless of the risks to my health, on your graduation day. With the money due to me, I could well afford to take some risks. But, obstructing justice through any number of vile tactics has empowered Michael L Darland of Bellevue, Wa. to inflict yet another irreparable damage upon our family life. (Apparently, that single comment was all it took for Michael L. Darland to cause Google to remove that lengthy post, packed with emotion, love and admiration for my grand daughter!) In turn, in college, Kaitlyn loved to share her proud grand pas post with her friends at Gonzaga University. Now, no thanks, to Michael L. Darland, Kaitlyn can no longer do that. (See lleclezio post # 2 in posts folder)) Just how self centered and/or paranoid about criticism can Michael L. Darland be?

The November 9, 2008 www.lleclezio.blogspot.com post dealt with the election of President Obama. After President Obama had been elected to the highest office in America, I posted on www.lleclezio.blogspot.com an article reflecting how the rest of the world was applauding that election. The article was entitled: America Dream Beyond All Frontiers. The post deserves to be read in its entirety. The article is in the form of a letter addressed to my children and grand children in America and Europe. In it I spur my children and grand children and my readers as follows: Just like I am reaching out to you today from tiny Rodrigues, to urge you to look beyond the frontiers of America, M.L.K.s message broke all frontiers of dreamland. Americracy has finally shed mediocracy to embrace true democracy. The greater glory of GOD throughout the global village is acclaimed with loud Alleluias from all four corners of the globe! Apparently that article did not please Michael L. Darland, one of the biggest donors to FreedomWorks in Washington State, either. It had to be also removed by Google! (See Document # 43) Oh! Excuse me! I almost forgot to mention that in that article I also had two short lines referencing Michael L. Darland and Republicans! Just how self centered and/or paranoid about criticism can Michael L. Darland be? (See lleclezio post # 1 in posts folder) Does Michael L. Darland believe that the world revolves around the circumference of his navel? Incidentally, Michael and Myrna Darland donated $50,000 to FreedomWorks shortly after their win on October 11, 2011. Did that represent just some of the spoils from their windfall win, after successfully defrauding me of my property, worth millions of dollars according to Darland, and denying me Free Speech? Considering all of the above are we all entitled to ask: In America FreedomWorks works for whom and how?

12. COLLECTION of ALL PAST POSTS:

See Section POSTS.

13. NOTICES FROM GOOGLE & CORRESPONDENCE

See Document # 43

14. REMARKS SPECIFIC TO THE HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND US SENATE. The House of Congress and the U.S. Senate are encouraged to take urgent action with regards to this Trial Brief. Otherwise this case could become an example of International Law and world opinion stepping in to either damage or hopefully rather be instrumental in strengthening the Constitutional rights that the majority of Americans, FreedomWorks and their major donor, Michael L. Darland supposedly hold so very dear. Hold so very dear, at least according to Darlands statement to Jim Brunner of the Seattle Times on February 3, 2012: What I hope they use it (Darlands $50,000 contribution to FreedomWorks) for is to find people and support people who believe as I do in following our Constitution," Darland said of his donation. Unfortunately, Darlands assertion contrasted by Darlands actions. was very soon thereafter drastically

Through his actions, Darland has ignored and has thumbed his nose at the Constitution and fraudulently, through a series of misrepresentations, induced Judge Michael E. Cooper and Google to do likewise. Considering who Michael L. Darland has revealed himself to be throughout this Trial Brief, the House of Congress and the U.S. Senate should also question the

real motives of Michael L. Darlands gift of $50,000 to FreedomWorks in December 2011. Has Michael L. Darland ever made such significant donations to Republican Party causes in the past? All who know Michael L. Darland, also know that Darland never gives away a grain of sand without exacting a whole sand quarry back in return. So why are Michael L. and Myrna Darland making such a major sudden donation to FreedomWorks in 2011? And why are they making a major donation now? Again many who know Michael L. Darland have heard him state unequivocally in the past that campaign donations are a waste of money. So why the sudden change of mind? Why was the Michael L. Darland gift made using Myrna Darland as an intermediary? Is Michael L. Darland indirectly making such meaningful donations to the Republican Party through vanity and only to be in the limelight? Virtually concurrently, is Michael L. Darland having all traces of my embarrassing posts exposing him to the naked truth and possible prosecution urgently removed in April 2012, just because Darland is an alleged psychopathic paranoid who needs to meticulously and constantly white wash his self tarred image? Or Is there a lot more to the overall Michael L. Darland long term scheming strategy? In his old age, could Michael L. Darland be aspiring to some glorifying post in Washington DC? Through his old contacts in Washington DC, is Michael L. Darland lobbying for a nomination there in return for his indirect donation to FreedomWorks should the Republican Party come in? Would that better explain why, all of a sudden in 2012, Michael L. Darland, becomes so very paranoid about any article that could jeopardize any potential Darland appointment to Washington DC and his clearance by the House of Congress and the U.S. Senate?

Please take note: The whole world read it here FIRST. So, just in case, I am right, the House of Congress and the U.S. Senate better prepare to look into the documents this Trial Brief point to. Additionally the House and Senate should request that the King County Superior Court unseal the docket in the class action suit brought by Steve Berman against Digital systems and Michael L. Darland personally. Apparently that suit initially alleging fraud by Darland could have degenerated in Darland facing additional charges of perjury and coercion, had it not been settled.

15. SPECIAL TRIBUTE TO EXEMPLARY SEATTLE/REDMOND ATTORNEY: JAMES D. McBRIDE. This Trial Brief would not be complete without paying a highly deserved and very special:

Tribute to Seattle/Redmond exemplary attorney: Jim McBride.

At a hearing held in front of Judge Michael E. Cooper in Kittitas County Court, Ellensburg on October 11, 2011 Mr. Jim McBride confirmed to me, once more, while I was sick, unable to travel and thousands of miles away, just what kind of a compassionate, smart, refined, noble and thorough gentleman James McBride, Esq. is. On October 11, 2011, it took only one short statement from that well known highly respected Seattle/Redmond attorney, Jim McBride, to say it all about his outstanding character. Jim McBride: Mr. Leclezio should not be punished for my neglect. I dont know if it is the family break up or my health problems which contributed or caused this situation. (See document # 26 P. 3 lines: 6 9) This is obviously an exemplary lawyer who goes beyond the call of duty to assume, his responsibilities and his perceived fiduciary obligations towards his client. James D. McBride does so regardless of the possible consequences for him or the circumstances surrounding his person that led to the unfortunate turn of events that resulted in Jim being faced with such a sad situation!

I was absolutely distraught when I read the transcript of that fatal October 11, 2011 hearing. I saw it for the first time at the end of April 2012 thanks to Google who acted as the Kittitas County Court messenger and made the transcript of that hearing finally available to me. When I read Jims statement above, I choked up with tears. In an instant, I better understood the magnitude of Jims most noble character. At any personal cost to him, Jim always looks out for the best for others and never puts himself ahead! On October 11, 2011, what a great lesson Jim gave to all involved in this case through the very few words, he was ever allowed to voice at that hearing. Unfortunately, I believe that too often in life, when fine pearls are cast in front of a malign audience, they are wasted. To be heard and understood by a bunch of mismatched listeners one should be able to go down to their level. Jim McBride would not know how to lower himself below his comfort zones and lower himself to those below the belt levels. I am not as noble as Jim and I do not mind doing it when it is called for, as in this case. The reply from attorney Jeff Slothower, from the small desert town of Ellensburg (Pop. 18, 174 in 2010) was also just as telling. Jeff Slothower: If Mr. McBride has a problem with the way he has handled this case, its not for the court to solve it. (See document # 26 P. 6 line 10 12} And again! Jeff Slothower: He can deal with Leclezios in his malpractice carriers if thats where he feels he is, but that should not be done at my clients prejudice. (See Document # 26 P. 7 lines 8 10) How harsh, callous and heartless could Jeff Slothower and the compliant Judge Cooper be with pleasure? (See Document # 26 P. 13 lines 21 & 22) Even more to the point, just how typical were Slothower and Cooper of that breed of sharks that project their bad image over the legal profession. In that desert town Court room on October 11, 2011, there could be NO room for any understanding or compassion shown to the sick. To a 72 year old attorney with a brilliant and faultless career who, although also stricken with cancer, had nonetheless made the effort to drive for over two hours to be in the desert town of Ellensburg on that day!

After 45 years of a brilliant and impeccable career, Jim McBride had most humbly appealed to the Courts discretion due to circumstances beyond Jims control. With profound understanding and great respect for Jim, I say that he was faced with Force Majeure. But in rural Ellensburg, Jim McBride was in a harsh and barren country totally unfamiliar to him. All around were parched dried out stark, severe and spiritless souls. By blatant contrast, Michael L. Darland was in his element. The scene had been set well in advance for Darland to win there and then. Decency and understanding were not to be a part of that bleak desert landscape. A court trial for parties who had been so tried for six long years could never be the order of the day. Michael L. Darland just had to receive his pre wrapped gift package on October 11, 2011 without a trial. Issues of force majeure or material facts could not and would not be a consideration! Any and all issues could not and would not be tried, simply because Judge Michael E. Cooper had come out of retirement on October 11, 2011, specifically to sit on the bench as pro tem Judge for that all important hearing. Did Judge Michael E. Cooper do so for reasons known to some alone or for reasons unknown to all? And since Judge Michael E. Cooper would not be around to preside over a trial, at the October 11, 2011 hearing, Judge Cooper, to oblige, was obliged to dispose of a trial and to strike off the trial date already set for November 15 or 18, 2011! (See Document # 26 P.13 lines 21 23!) Yet, when Darland was delaying/denying us Justice for years through endless ploys, frivolous claims and late Appeals in front of the Washington State Bar Association, we did not object. We held the high road and allowed Darland all the rope he needed to hang himself with. Well, we did. We knew just how solid our case was. We never banked on a Judge like Michael E. Cooper letting an alleged criminal like Michael L. Darland fly the coop. In the past, Darland had deservedly been hung after months of wasting everybodys time in front the respectable forums such asthe Washington State Bar Association in the big city of Seattle. (See

Document # 23) But, in the small desert town of Ellensburg, once those country cowboys felt they had lassoed, the big time, big city, noble attorney, Jim McBride, simply because he was horribly sick and down on the ground, they could not afford to let go and give Jim McBride a second stab at justice through a fair trial. That goes to show just how sordid the Michael L. Darland case was. On October 11, 2011, Jim McBride was wounded and ill. The famished and wild desert coyotes were at his heels. Darland, Slothower and Cooper were howling in concert ready for their repugnant kill. They had smelt blood and they were standing ready to lap it up. Never ever expecting some day, to have to face the Hill! But, they will. Throughout the Trial Brief, The International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and the US Senate will realize that on October 11, 2011, Ellensburg attorney, Jeff Slothower got all he asked for in a pre wrapped package. To top it all, it was presented to Slothower with pleasure by the retired Judge Michael E. Cooper who had, for obvious reasons of his own, dealt away any due process and/or trial! But, is it also not equally evident that Slothower, will never ever have any honesty or class? Those qualities come from the cradle. And no Judge can hand those down, especially not from a stenched up bench. On October 11, 2011, Jim McBride lost but, in my mind, the giant that Jim is, stood very tall as he dwarfed the rest of them in Court on that day. As for the cheap shots concerning malpractice carriers fired at Mr. James D. McBride by Slothower, I thank God that my attorney is not a bird of that feather. Neither am I. Unlike Michael L. Darland, I am neither possessed by greed nor obsessed by the need to have ever more money. I leave that to gulls and coyotes. They are best at fighting for scraps. (See Picture # 1 in Picture section) What Jim chose to qualify as neglect I prefer to term Force Majeure and show much compassion about. For over a decade, Jim McBride has never once wittingly neglected me or his responsibilities towards me by design! There had to be Force Majeure. Therefore, I refuse to load onto Jim McBrides broad shoulders, burdens

for which Michael L. Darland is solely and alone responsible. I refuse to do so, although I know very well that Michael L. Darland does not have and will never have the backbone to carry his own burdens. Genuine and solid men humbly face their responsibilities with dignity whether they are ill or not. Others, like slithery eels always attempt to slip away while assigning their ills to others. Jim McBride had listened to my litany of health woes for years. Not once did Jim ever tell me about his personal problems! On the contrary Jim kept urging me to stay alive and to fight on. By constantly, encouraging me, before Jim finally got sick himself, Jim wanted me to believe that thanks to God and our own efforts, a better day was at hand, hopefully soon! Today, in May 2012, I finally know that we are both sick. That clearly explains to me why Jim, over the last year was no longer the Jim I had known and learnt to respect so very much for so many years. Today, after reading the October 11, 2011 transcript, I respect Jim ever so much more. Today, God only knows who will go first? But to the death, I will fight for Jim to be vindicated. Today, that is my promise to Jim McBride. Because, all involved in Snocadia should be most thankful to James McBride, Esq,. Without that most brilliant and noble attorney, there would not have been any Snocadia case for anyone to get rich or poor over. That case has for sure allowed all, Douglas Warr Nicholson and Judge Michael E. Cooper included, to display and divulge their true colors. But, because Snocadia has become a part of our individual lifes quilt, there will be justice for each and every one of us one day based on the color of the patch we have each contributed to the overall Snocadia quilt. Be it here on earth, in heaven and/or in hell, as free men, free to deal as we choose and free to express ourselves for the common good of all and/or the detriment of some, In a FREE world all the options should remain ours. May we all make the right individual choices?

Thereafter, we will each end up just exactly there, where we deserve to be. I thank God that His ultimate justice will not be according to mans poor judgment but strictly in harmony with Gods omniscient eternal Justice. I feel most confident that when that day comes Jim McBride will have a place of choice. Behaving just as Jesus commanded us to do, James D. McBride has always treated others as he would have liked to have been treated. That is the Jim McBride I am most proud to know and to pay this tribute to.

16. PICTURES REMOVED FROM: www.snocadia.blogspot.com inaccessible thru Picasa. SERIES OF PICTURES OF SNOCADIA Snoqualmie Pass

See Picture Section: Snocadia.

Were those pictures too friendly towards the Environment or judged defamatory? Let the pictures speak for themselves. 17. MY PROFILE REJOICING OVER OUR TRUE WEALTH: Our Faith - Our 5 children and our 23 grand children

See Document # 46 in Documents Section See Picture Section: Proflie. 18. MUSIC
'We are the world' Lionel Ritchie Michael Jackson et al Isnt it too bad that Michael L. Darland, Michael E. Cooper and Google do not sing 'Our own song' and all the other songs that the rest of the world believes in and enjoys singing. 'Think', if only they did! - 'Freedom, freedom, freedom would be theirs and finally ours as well!

In all languages we could join together to sing: 'Je Chante Avec Toi Libert'. Happily singing our joy to be liberated, we could move around the world unbound and free to go from the classical music of the slaves choir in the Nabucco Opera by Verdi, to the Mauritian Sega of Cassiya: 'Le Morne'. That is from where our fellow Mauritian slaves died for the freedom of Africa and the whole world. We are the world: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2H6mpUnsLI&feature=youtube_gdata_player Sing our own song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htZ4uk-dumQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player THINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fjHsAgMw9c&feature=youtube_gdata_player Je Chante Avec Toi LIBERTE... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR6QDNiFtLI&feature=youtube_gdata_player Le Morne... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evQjtT4o6vs&feature=youtube_gdata_player