Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Motivation and scope
Description of the approach:
Governing equations
Numerical structure and limiting technique
Specialization for the modeling of specific devices
Validation: high performance Aprilia V4 engine:
Pressure pulses in the intake and exhaust ducts
Volumetric Efficiency
Sound Pressure level
A. Della Torre
A. Della Torre
Quasi-3D approach
Geometry is reconstructed by
means of a network of cells and
ports
A. Della Torre
Governing equations
Based on the formulation of the conservation equations of mass, momentum
and energy for unsteady flows
+ (U) = 0
t
U
+ (UU) = p
t
e0
+ (e0 U) + (pU) = 0
t
Viscosity of the gas, both in the intake and exhaust system, is very low: it can
be neglected without introducing an excessive approximation (Euler formulation)
System of equations is closed with the perfect gas equation of state
A. Della Torre
Numerical Method
Second order accurate and stable
Pseudo-staggered grid:
Mass and Energy equations are integrated over the cell control volume
Momentum equation is integrated over the port control volume
The method is stabilized adding a diffusion source term to the momentum equation
cell CV
A. Della Torre
port CV
Paper Number: ICES2012-81181
CELL
exact
DTM
Pressure [bar]
PORT
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
x [m]
A. Della Torre
Model specialization
Cell and port definitions have been specialized to handle particular devices
such as:
Catalysts (TWC, DOC, SCR ...)
Diesel Particulate Filters
Perforated elements (baffles, pipes)
Filtering devices
Sound absorbing material
A. Della Torre
Perforated Elements
Filter cartridge
Ms = (pDarcy ) Ap
t
L
pDarcy
wwall
Up
=
Kwall
A. Della Torre
external 3Dcell
external 3Dcell
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
w
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111
A. Della Torre
t
2
Ms = (U F ) |U | fw t + pinout F
A. Della Torre
Engine Type
Spark Ignition
Number of cylinder
4-V65o
Total displacement
Bore
0.078 [m]
Stroke
0.0523 [m]
Compression ratio
13:1
Air Management
Naturally aspirated
Injection system
PFI
1.30
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.20
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.20
1.30
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
-360
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
Crank angle [ ]
A. Della Torre
120
180
240
300
360
0.70
-360
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
120
180
240
300
360
Crank angle [ ]
1.30
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.20
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.20
1.30
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
-360
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
120
180
240
300
0.70
-360
360
-300
-240
-180
-120
Crank angle [ ]
60
o
120
180
240
300
360
300
360
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.35
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
Crank angle [ ]
1.50
1.35
-60
1.20
1.05
0.90
0.75
0.60
-360
1.20
1.05
0.90
0.75
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
Crank angle [ ]
A. Della Torre
120
180
240
300
360
0.60
-360
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
120
180
240
Crank angle [ ]
2.00
2.10
5
1.60
Measured
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.80
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
-360
Measured
1D-quasi3D
1.80
1.50
1.20
0.90
0.60
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
Crank angle [ ]
A. Della Torre
120
180
240
300
360
-360
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
120
180
240
300
360
Crank angle [ ]
1.40
Measured
1D-3Dcell
Measured
1D-3Dcell
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.2
1.1
Back Pressure
1.50
0.9
0.8
0.6
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.4
0.3
4000
0.90
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
A. Della Torre
Without silencer
With silencer
150
125
100
75
50
25
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Frequency [Hz]
A. Della Torre
Optimization
Example: maximization of silencer TL
Parameters: position of the two internal baffles
Other possible targets:
Stand-alone component: TL & pressure drop
Entire engine: SPL & volumetric efficiency
A. Della Torre
Optimization
Example: maximization of silencer TL
Parameters: position of the two internal baffles
Other possible targets:
Stand-alone component: TL & pressure drop
Entire engine: SPL & volumetric efficiency
A. Della Torre
Computational runtimes
1D-quasi3D
Pressure [Pa x 10 ]
1.40
Measured
1D 3D coupling
1.20
1D
15 [min]
1.00
1D-3D
20 [hours]
0.80
1D-quasi3D
45 [min]
0.60
0.40
-360
-300
-240
-180
-120
-60
60
o
120
180
240
300
360
Crank angle [ ]
A. Della Torre
Conclusions
A stable numerical procedure to perform both acoustic and fluid dynamic simulation of 3D shaped devices has been presented
Specific sub-models for filtering and after treatment devices have been developed
Engine modeling is based on pure geometrical reconstruction without the
need of resorting to corrective lengths or equivalent ducts schemes
Engine performance parameters can be determined with good accuracy and
low computational effort
Acoustic properties can be evaluated in real operating conditions
DOE shape optimization is affordable
A. Della Torre
A. Della Torre