2010 General Dynamics. All rights reserved. Image courtesy U. S. Navy.

April 2011

Volume 25

Number 2

U.S. Naval Institute I www.usni.org

18

The Sumter Conundrum

By Craig L. Symonds For newly elected President Abraham Lincoln, Fort Sumter was more than just a military problemit was a political tightrope-walk.

26

The Navys Evolutionary War

By Craig L. Symonds The coastal and riverine challenges of the Civil War spawned technological innovation and a futuristiclooking U.S. Fleet.

36

Lincolns Father Neptune

By Craig L. Symonds Brusque, widely disliked, oddly bewigged, Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles was nonetheless the right man for a tough job.

26
COVER: An unidentified U.S. Navy Sailor poses for the camera in this photograph from the Liljenquist Family Collection, a treasure trove of more than 700 rare Civil War images donated to the Library of Congress in 2010.

40

Suggestions for Further Civil War Reading

By Craig L. Symonds A selection of essentials for the Civil War navalists library.

Special Center Spread

Naval Powers Broad Reach During the Civil War.

42

Cold War Duty in the Black Sea Fleet

By Vladimir Mandel A Ukrainian sailor remembers shipboard propagandists, a friendly U.S. enemy, and everyday life in the Soviet navy.

50
DEPARTMENTS
4 On Our Scope 6 Looking Back 8 In Contact 10 Naval History News 12 Flight Line 14 Historic Aircraft 66 Historic Fleets 76 Book Reviews 80 Museum Report

A Cup O Joe
By Captain Raymond J. Brown, U.S. Coast Guard (Retired) From the wardroom to the boiler room, the Sea Services percolate along on the strength of that most beloved ships staple: good, hot coffee.

54

An Appalling Calamity
By Noah Andre Trudeau In the teeth of the Great Samoan Typhoon of 1889, a standoff between the German and U.S. navies suddenly didnt matter.

60

The Sailor Who Torpedoed a Train

By Carl LaVO The target: a Japanese supply train. The weapon: an innovative U.S. submariner.

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

Contributors
Captain Raymond J. Brown is a retired U.S. Coast Guard officer who has commanded at sea and is both a USCG cutterman and a U.S. Navy surface warfare officer. An awardwinning essayist, he has contributed to Proceedings magazine and to national cable news networks. He currently is an all-hazards consultant, working principally in transportation. Carl LaVO, a frequent Naval History contributor, is the author of The Galloping Ghost: The Extraordinary Life of Submarine Legend Eugene Fluckey (Naval Institute Press, 2007). Hes currently completing work on a biography of Vice Admiral Allan R. McCann, who pioneered the submarine rescue chamber that saved the lives of 33 men trapped in the sunken USS Squalus (SS-192) in 1939.

Vladimir Mandel served twice in the Soviet Unions Black Sea Fleet, first as a seaman with a radio rating in 1966. He later (196972) was a connection and observation lieutenant in the destroyer Komsomolets Ukrainy. He holds a degree in physics from Odessa State University and is vice director of the Physical Scientific and Research Institute in Odessa, Ukraine.

Craig L. Symonds is professor emeritus of history at the U.S. Naval Academy and the author or editor of 25 books on Civil War and naval history. His book Lincoln and his Admirals (Oxford University Press, 2008) won the Barondess Prize, the Laney Prize, the Lyman Prize, the Abraham Lincoln Book Award, and the 2009 Lincoln Prize.

Noah Andre Trudeau is the author of numerous books about the Civil War, including, most recently, Robert E. Lee: Lessons in Leadership (Palgrave, 2009) and Southern Storm: Shermans March to the Sea (HarperCollins, 2008). His previous Naval History articles include A Naval Tragedys Chain of Errors (February 2010) about the 1923 Honda Point disaster.

Naval History (ISSN 1042-1920) is published bimonthly by the U.S. Naval Institute, 291 Wood Road, Annapolis, MD 21402. To order subscriptions, memberships, books, or selected photographs: 800-233-8764, 410-268-6110; fax 410-5711703. Subscriptions: Naval Institute members $20 one year; Naval Institute memberships: $49 one year. Editorial offices: U.S. Naval Academy, Beach Hall, 291 Wood Road, Annapolis, MD 21402-5034; 410-268-6110; fax 410-295-1049. Periodicals postage paid at Annapolis, MD, and at additional mailing offices. Copyright 2011 U.S. Naval Institute. Copyright is not claimed for editorial material in the public domain. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Naval History, Naval Institute Circulation, 291 Wood Rd., Annapolis, MD 21402. Submissions (please supply contact numbers and return address): Editor-in-Chief, Naval History, U.S. Naval Institute, 291 Wood Rd., Annapolis, MD 21402-5034 (include IBM-compatible diskette); articlesubmissions@ usni.org; fax 410-295-1049. The U.S. Naval Institute is a private, self-supporting, not-for-profit professional society, which publishes Proceedings and Naval History magazines and professional books as part of the open forum it maintains for the sea services. The Naval Institute is not an agency of the U.S. government; the opinions expressed in these pages are the personal views of the authors.

www.USNI.org

U.S. Naval Institute Reprint Program

U.S. Naval Institutes Reprint Program is an opportunity for you to have customized copies of articles featured in Proceedings and Naval History. For more information on U.S. Naval Institutes Reprint Program, or to order, please email: magreprints@usni.org or call 410.295.1079 use Them As:
Handouts for tradeshows, sales meetings and conferences Press releases and media kits New product announcements Potential investor information

www.usni.org | 800.233.8764
Defending America through the Power of Ideas

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

ASHFORD UNIVERSITY SERVES MILITARY STUDENTS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD

EARN YOUR ASSOCIATES, BACHELORS, OR MASTERS DEGREE ONLINE

Your Ashford Military Tuition Grant covers all required course materials and you pay only $250 a credit for undergraduate courses. Your military training counts. Transfer up to 99 previously earned credits from prior college/work experiences. There is no fee to apply and the Technology Services Fee is waived by your Ashford Military Tuition Grant, a $1,290 savings. 5-6 week courses are taken one at a time so you can earn your degree without disrupting your life.

2008 - 2010

CALL TOLL FREE 800.507.6761 VISIT US ONLINE MILITARY.ASHFORD.EDU/PROCEEDINGS

REGIONALLY ACCREDITED BY THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION (NCAHLC.ORG)

Benets apply to all Active Duty, National Guard, Reservists and spouses, dependents utilizing VA education benets, plus civilian DOD employees, Coast Guard employees & separated vets/retirees using VA education benets. Ashford University 400 North Bluff Blvd. Clinton, Iowa 52732
1 0 AU 1 9 6 3 AC - 0 2 5 5

On Our Scope
aval History has been fortunate to have top historians contribute to its biannual fold-out issues, and this one, commemorating the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, is no exception. Craig L. Symonds, professor emeritus of history at the U.S. Naval Academy and an award-winning authority on the conflicts naval battles, personalities, and strategies, is the author of our special sections three feature articles. Dr. Symonds starts at the beginningexamining in The Sumter Conundrum newly inaugurated President Abraham Lincolns efforts to dispatch a naval expedition to resupply besieged Fort Sumter without touching off a war. In The Navys Evolutionary War, he takes a broad look at the U.S. Navys critical, albeit supporting, role in the conflict and how the service was able to harness new technologies and ship designs to blockade the Confederacy, capture its ports, and conquer the Souths Western river strongholds. Gideon Welles was often lampooned during the war for his eccentricities, including his mismatched brown wig and white beard, but Dr. Symonds argues in Lincolns Father Neptune that the Secretary of the Navy proved to be a skilled administrator during an era of massive naval expansion. Finally, for those wanting to learn even more, Dr. Symonds offers advice in Suggestions for Further Civil War Reading. While the outcome of the war was ultimately decided on land, all too often its naval aspects are reduced to several ship duels. Our gatefold, Naval Powers Broad Reach, depicts the expansive and innovative roles played by the Union and Confederate navies. Chief credit for this bonus feature goes to design director Kelly Erlinger and graphic artists James Caiella and Karen Erlinger. Beginning with The Sumter Conundrum, a recurring character in our gatefold packageand one of the wars greatest naval heroesis an officer who later exerted a paternal influence on the U.S. Naval Institute. Outspoken, ambitious David Dixon LIBRARy OF CONGRESS Porter rose meteorically through the officers ranks Rear Admiral David Dixon Porter stands during the Civil Warfrom lieutenant in 1861 to behind only David Glasgow Farragut in the the Navys sixth-most senior admiral in 65. Along the way he served on blockade duty, pantheon of U.S. Navy Civil War heroes. chased the commerce raider CSS Sumter, led naval forces on the Mississippi, and helped conquer Fort Fisher. Porter was also the wars foremost naval practitioner of jointness, working efficiently with professional Army officers including Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Shermanbut displaying little patience for political generals such as Benjamin Butler and Nathaniel Banks. An innovative commander, Porter relied on iron and steam to patrol Confederate waters and subdue enemy strongpoints. But, ironically, during a three-month period in 1869 when he was the de facto chief of the Navy Department, he oversaw the services regression to reliance on sail power. The next year Porter succeeded his foster-brother, David Glasgow Farragut, in the largely ceremonial position of Admiral of the Navy. Despite being the services highest ranking officer, Admiral Porter had little power to halt the Navys slide into the dark ages of the 1870s. But according to historian Charles Oscar Paullin, he vigorously and insistently declared the countrys need of a new navy. And when a group of naval officers also concerned about the direction of the Sea Service met in 1873 to form the Naval Institute for the advancement of professional and scientific knowledge of the Navy, the venerable admiral agreed to serve as the organizations first president. Richard G. Latture Editor-in-Chief

U.S. NAVAL I NSTIT U T E

Naval HiStOry 291 Wood Rd. Annapolis, MD 21402-5034 Tel: (410) 268-6110 Fax: (410) 295-1049 Editor-in-ChiEf Richard G. Latture rlatture@usni.org AssoCiAtE Editors Robin Bisland rbisland@usni.org Eric Mills emills@usni.org Donald Ross dross@usni.org Editor-in-ChiEf Proceedings Paul Merzlak pmerzlak@usni.org EditoriAl ProjECt CoordinAtor Liese Doherty ldoherty@usni.org dirECtor of dEsign And ProduCtion Kelly Erlinger kerlinger@usni.org sEnior dEsignEr Jen Mabe jmabe@usni.org Photo Editor Amy Voight avoight@usni.org Contributing Editors Robert J. Cressman, Norman Polmar, Fred Schultz, Paul Stillwell PublishEr William Miller wmiller@usni.org AdvErtising sAlEs DirectorWilliam K. Hughes wmkhughes@comcast.net ManagerDavid Sheehan dsheehan@usni.org Advertising AssistantMichelle Mullen mmullen@usni.org CEo MGEN Thomas L. Wilkerson, USMC (Ret.) twilkerson@usni.org EditoriAl boArd ChairmanCAPT Douglas M. Fears, USCG Vice ChairmanCAPT Mark L. Stevens, USN LCDR Claude G. Berube, USNR SGTMAG David K. Devaney, USMC CMDCM Jacqueline L. DiRosa, USN LT Bradley D. Harrison, USNR BMCM Kevin P. Leask, USCG MAJ Marcus J. Mainz, USMC CAPT David M. McFarland, USN LCDR Jeffrey W. Novak, USCG CDR John P. Patch, USN (Ret.) LTC Kendric H. Robbins, USA COL Philip C. Skuta, USMC

Printed in the USA

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Artwork honoring the power and pride of the U.S. Navy is yours for the rst time in a handcrafted Cuckoo Clock

The U.S. Navy has defended the shores of freedom since the days of the American Revolution. They serve the country with honor, manning the decks of mighty aircraft carriers and Tin Can destroyers, ready at a moments notice to sail the seven seas in the name of liberty.

Honor the Heroes of the High Seas

Pay tribute to the proud history of the U.S. Navy every day with this Cuckoo Clock featuring artist Dennis Lyalls montage imagery. Hand-crafted with a real wood case, sculpted artists resin adornments and Old World styling, this handsome timepiece features soaring eagle sculpture at the top, anked by sculpted U.S. and Navy ags. A precise quartz movement powers the clocks hands as well as the pendulum underneath. And, at the beginning of each hour, the door at the top of the cabinet opensand a handpainted, sculptural cuckoo in a sailors uniform emerges with a chirping melody.

Strictly LimitedOrder Today!

Strong demand is expected, so act now to acquire Hour of Glory Cuckoo Clock at its $149.95* issue price, payable in ve installments of $29.99 each. Your purchase is backed by our 365-day money-back guarantee. Send no money now. Just mail the Reservation Application today!
Classically designed cuckoo clock makes an elegant addition to any decor.

RESERVATION APPLICATION THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE _______________________________________

9345 Milwaukee Avenue Niles, IL 60714-1393

YES. Please reserve the Hour of Glory Cuckoo

Clock for me as described in this announcement. Limit: one per order. Please Respond Promptly Signature____________________________________ Mr. Mrs. Ms. _________________________________
Name (Please Print Clearly)

Sculptural cuckoo in a sailor suit announces each hour.

Clock case shown much smaller than actual size of appr. 18 inches tall x 3 inches deep Requires 2 D and 1 AA battery, not included.
Neither the U.S. Navy nor any other component of the Department of Defense has approved, endorsed, or authorized this product.

Address _____________________________________ City ________________________________________ State __________________ Zip __________________

01-04492-001-E37192
*Plus a total of $15.99 shipping and service. Limited-edition presentation restricted to 295 crafting days. Please allow 4-8 weeks after initial payment for shipment. Sales subject to product availability and order acceptance.

2008 BGE 01-04492-001-BI

Looking Back

By Paul Stillwell

The End of Dont Ask, Dont Tell

in 1948 until Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, as hortly before Christmas, remain in the Navy, Coye had to resort to CNO in the early 1970s, directed proacPresident Barack Obama signed deception about her feelings. As a comtive steps toward equal opportunity. into law a repeal of the contromanding officer, she saw the hypocrisy of People whom I respect opposed the versial Dont Ask, Dont Tell kicking gay subordinates out of the Navy. repeal of Dont Ask, Dont Tell. Some policy that prohibited gay and lesbian She chose to retire in 1980, sooner than based their objections on religious beliefs. personnel from serving openly in the planned, so she could be herself. Marine Commandant James Amos tesU.S. armed services. Its an important In 2005 I interviewed Admiral Charles tified to Congress against the change. milestone in the nations military history Larson, who saw much change during his Amos argued that it would be disrupand a symbol of changing attitudes on 44 years on active duty. Drawing a contive to introduce openly gay status durthe part of the populace as a whole. trast with the history of racial integration, ing wartime. At the same time, In 2001 our youngest son, Jim, told my he predicted, someday he and the other service chiefs wife, Karen, and me that he is gay. Since gays will be accepted in pledged that they would carry that time we have watched that evoluthe military, but I think out the change in policy if tion of society through his eyes as well as thats one issue that directed by Congress. our own. society will have to be I recall many years ago ahead of the military. hearing a rhetorical quesHe added a personal tion posed by my father, perspective: Probably who was an outspoken libabout in 198485, eral on the subject of racial our oldest daughter justice but not on sexual Sigrid . . . confided in matters. He asked, Why [my wife] Sally that she would anyone want to go to was gay. She asked Sally bed with another guy when if she would tell me. there are so many goodSally said, No, thats looking gals available? My something youve got own thinking at the time to tell your dad yourself. I was similar to his. When think Sigrid was concerned Dad died in 2004 at the about how I, as a military age of 92, the minister who officer, might accept that. spoke at his funeral made But she came and told me, a point of saying that my and I told her that made father had come to embrace no difference to methat his churchs open accep- ABOVE: U.S. NAVy (CHAD J. MCNEELEy); INSET: U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PHOTO ARCHIVE she was my daughter, and I Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen told a Senate panel he was tance of gays and lesbians. loved her. . . . My attitude had changed against a policy that forced service men and women, such as Commander Beth After I got the news, by then as well. When I Coye (inset) to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens. Sally said that if I had not served on active duty in the accepted Sigrid, that she 1960s, at Officer Candidate would have had trouble One of the telling statements on the School and on board ships, there were continuing to live with me. . . . I got a subject came during testimony from jokes about queers, homos, and real test, because I had no warning. It Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the worse. In many cases the speakers probcame to me, and I had to make a deciJoint Chiefs of Staff. He said, No matter ably intended no malice, but the effect sion right there. There was no decision to how I look at the issue, I cannot escape depends on ones viewpoint. Jim has told make; it was an instinctive reaction that being troubled by the fact that we have us of the derision he has experienced pershe had my support. in place a policy which forces young men sonally, which brings the hurt home. An individuals sexuality is but one and women to lie about who they are in Because attitudes cannot be legislated, of many factors that make a person who order to defend their fellow citizens. the change in the law is likely to run into he or she is. Congress has decided that it That point was illustrated in the novel problems as the Department of Defense should no longer be a yes-or-no characMy Navy Too (Cedar Hollow Press, 1997). and individual services develop plans teristic that defines the ability to serve. Retired Commander Beth Coye, whose and implement new policies. The law of One of the important values in all the father was a decorated World War II subunintended consequences will probably services is honor. The nation asks its men marine skipper, wrote much of the book. rear its head, and there may be delays. and women to serve with integrity, and She spent 21 years in the Navy, and her It was more than 20 years from the time the recent change in the law will make book, though fiction, is based on her expePresident Harry Truman ordered the that possible for many who have been riences as a serving officer and lesbian. To racial desegregation of the armed services excluded up to now.

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

It stays forever in your heart

Unfortunately, it also stays forever in your lungs

Are you or a loved one a Navy, Merchant Marine or Coast Guard veteran who suffers or has died from asbestos-related

Mesothelioma or Lung Cancer?

Know your rights, and know what youre entitled to from the asbestos companies. Few firms have the track record of Weitz & Luxenberg in securing over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements for asbestos victims and their families. For a free consultation with the law firm to which other lawyers refer their asbestos cases, call the Weitz & Luxenberg client relations department at 1-888-411-LAWS (5297) today.

WEITZ LUXENBERG P.C.

ASBESTOS

&

LAW OFFICES

DRUGS/MEDICAL DEVICES

ENVIRONMENTAL

NEGLIGENCE

700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

BRANCH OFFICES IN NEW JERSEY, CALIFORNIA & COLORADO

1.888.411.LAWS

www.weitzlux.com

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. We may associate with local firms in states wherein we do not maintain an office.

In Contact
The Olympia Then and Now Thomas S. Wyman
In Hot Time in the Old Town Tonight (February, pp. 3237), Lieutenant Commander Thomas Cutler graphically recounts the decisive role of the Olympia and her crew in the 1898 Battle of Manila Bay. In doing so, he makes a compelling case for saving this Matriarch of the Fleet. She is a historical vessel that recalls the time when coal was supplanting sail. Fire control was a manual operation. This reminder of times past offers a compelling overview of how far naval design has evolved over the last century. It should not be lost to future generations. The author mentions only in passing the cruisers last assignment in returning the body of the Unknown Soldier to his homeland some 90 years ago following World War I. This was a ceremonial voyage under the command of Captain Henry Lake Wyman that captured the nations attention. The homeward voyage of the Olympia, with the Unknowns casket lashed to an upper deck, had its tense moments when the vessel encountered gale-force winds and heavy seas in the midAtlantic and began to roll alarmingly. The ships last assignment was completed as the Navy formally transferred the casket to the Army on 9 November 1921 at the Washington Navy Yard. Two days later, after an emotionally charged ceremony, the Unknown Soldier was laid to rest at Arlington Cemetery. (See Known But to God, December 1996, pp. 4548, by this writer.) This final assignment of the Olympia and its importance in the consciousness of the nation is an additional compelling reason to assure that this historic vessel is preserved. The ship is an integral part of American history. of nationally recognized standards against which ship-preservation projects could be measured with the aim of discouraging impractical schemes? I attended the session concerned with the Olympia, perhaps the session that garnered the greatest interest, but the end result again was only a series of hopeful aspirations. Lieutenant Commander Cutlers enthusiastic article about the Olympia and the Battle of Manila Bay echoed the enthusiasms of a century ago, when journalists superhyped everything about the SpanishAmerican War. But I wonder if, today, many consider it less passionately and in so doing make the Olympias importance a harder sell. The war, after all, was a lopsided affair in which a bullying United States beat up on a decrepit Spain and gained itself a cheap empire in the process. And how many think it iconic and glorious that an overpowering American naval force shot up an essentially anchored foe, pausing at one point and feeding the crews, and suffering only six WIA in the battle? A tough sell, indeed, when compared with other U.S. naval actions before and since.

Commander Tyrone G. Martin, U. S. Navy (Retired)

I attended the recent Maritime Heritage Conference as an observer and heard speaker after speaker bemoan the problems of getting funds with which to maintain their ships. None of them offered any solutions to the problem. In private conversations around the conference area, however, could be heard such questions posed as Are there too many preserved ships? and Would it be useful to establish a set

Recollecting a Civil War Hero Major Norman T. Hatch, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)
I was greatly surprised and pleased to read in the December issue about John Bickford of Gloucester, Maine, serving as a young man on board the Kearsarge in the Civil War (I Didnt Feel Excited a Mite, pp. 3641). I first met him when I was about five years old and he was the owner of Bickfords Float on Rocky Neck in East Gloucester. He was known by the nickname Bunch and was extremely kind to the youngsters who hung around the float doing minor jobs or getting sailing instruction. Bunch owned, among other craft, several ten-foot cat boats that he used for the latter purpose. I was large for my age and hung out with the older boys whenever possible, but Bunch saw through my efforts and didnt put me in one of the cat boats. To the best of my knowledge, Bunch never told the youngsters of his exploits on board the Kearsarge. Therefore, one

COURTESY OF MAJOR NORMAN T. HATCH, USMC (RET)

Long after John Bickford earned the Medal of Honor for actions during the Kearsarges Civil War duel with the Alabama, reader Norman Hatch knew him as the kindly gentleman who ran this boat float in East Gloucester, Maine. Later, Hatch also experienced combat, as a Marine cameraman in the Pacific war.

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

day in the pentagon when I was preparing to invite the audiovisual media in to view a new exhibit extolling all of the Medal of Honor winners, I was greatly surprised to come across Bunchs name among the names of the medals recipients. To read the excellent article by Norman C.

Delaney outlining Bunchs heroics at sea in those perilous times put the frosting on the cake. I have enclosed a color print of a painting by Emile Gruppe of Bickfords Float. Gruppe was considered the finest seascape artist of his time and documented much of Gloucesters fishing fleet. of the more recent contributions of many nations in the ongoing struggle against terrorism, this lack of cooperation by our NATO alliesexcept for the British, who allowed F-111s to fly from an RAF baseis noteworthy. At crunch time, the United States had little international support. But our allies did not merely stay on the sidelines. Two years ago, Libyan Foreign Minister Abdel Rahman Shalgam disclosed that in April 1986, Bettino Craxi, then the Italian prime minister, warned Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi that the United States would bomb his country two days later (Italy Warned Libya of Bombing, Saved Qaddafis Life, Bloomberg News, 30 October 2008). According to the Bloomberg account, Giulio Andreotti, who was Italys foreign minister in April 1986, and Margherita Boniver, then the foreign affairs chief of Craxis Socialist party, both confirmed that the disclosure occurred. The U.S. strike targeted Libyan military sites, and at least 36 Libyans died in the raids, including Gadhafis adopted daughter, although Gadhafi survived an attack on his compound at Bab al Aziziya. Andreotti called the U.S. strike on Libya in 1986 an uncalled-for initiative, an error in international affairs, and Boniver boasted that Craxi had not only denied U.S. aircraft permission to use Italian airspace, but also used all the channels available to him to warn the colonel [Gadhafi].

El Dorado Canyon Reflections and Insights Vice Admiral Robert F. Dunn, U.S. Navy (Retired)
Congratulations to Naval History and to Lieutenant Commander Stanik for his article Americas First Strike Against Terrorism (February, pp. 2431), reminding us all of a very important event from 25 years ago: the retaliatory strike against Moammar Gadhafi. El Dorado Canyon was a signal event, the first blow in what would become the War on Terror, and the beginning of a shift from the Cold War focus on the Soviets to other missions for the Sixth Fleet. By and large the author gives a clear description of the events and what led up to them, but he gives the U.S. Air Force far too much credit. It invited itself in, and it wasnt needed, except in the context of interservice politics. The aircraft carriers deployed to the Mediterranean had more than enough assets and firepower to carry out the mission. Yet capable A-7s and F/A-18s were relegated to support missions so the F-111s from Royal Air Force Station Lakenheath could play. At this late date its difficult to pinpoint the source of the demand for the Air Force to play, but all signs point to its influence on the Commander-in-Chief Europe staff. No matter where the idea originated, Air Force participation was approved, and to their credit, crews at Lakenheath geared up. Unfortunately, there werent enough of them on hand, so the operation had to be delayed several days while needed aircraft and crews flew from Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. Once started, the 1,600-mile flight from the U.K. to the scene of action had to be supported by numerous refuelings, AWACs, and command-ship logistics. Worse, some of the crews had never before flown together as a team. Some scholars believe that may have been the root cause of the fly-into-the water loss of one of the F-111s off the coast of Tripoli. Meanwhile, except for A-6 Intruders, capable and well-trained carrier-based Navy and Marine crews and their A-7s and F/A18s either sat on the deck or bored holes in the sky waiting for the Air Force to coast out and start on that return 1,600-mile trek. Time and again the value of joint operations has been shown, but its almost always when more numbers are needed or
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

one service has a needed capability the other does not have. Joint operations for purely political reasons is costly and never makes sense. Operation El Dorado Canyon was an example of such nonsense. One would hope the record would be corrected. Editors note: Vice Admiral Dunn was commander Naval Air Forces, U.S. Atlantic Fleet at the time of El Dorado Canyon.

Gary Hudson
While reading Americas First Strike Against Terrorism, the phrase the United States first war against international terrorism broughtto mind the actions taken from September 1983 through February 1984, when several U.S. Navy combatants fired into Druse and Syrianpositions in the hills east of Beirut. Targetswere command bunkers and artillery, rocket, mortar, and antiaircraft batteries, which had fired into and around Beirut,at U. S. Marines ashore and at two U.S. Navy F-14s. Retaliation by A-6 and A-7 aircraft resulted in the loss of an A-6 and an A-7. Ships responding to various attacks included the battleship New Jersey (BB-62), carriers Independence (CV-62) and John F. Kennedy (CV-67), and destroyers Caron (DD-970) and Tattnall (DDG-19). An interesting aspect of these bombardments was that some of the 16-inch firing was rather inaccurate. Investigation determined the cause was faulty ammunition;no 16-inch ammunition had been manufactured for 30 years. Some analysts considered that the resultant collateral damage may have contributed to the downgrading of U.S. influence in the Middle East.

Guns and Ships at the Canal George S. Mihalik

I enjoyed James Hornfischers article The Washington Wins the Draw (February, pp. 3847) very much and look forward to reading his book, Neptunes Inferno: The U.S. Navy at Guadalcanal. On page 42 there is a reference to the first naval officer to take fire from 16-inch guns. This did not occur in this battle, but in the May 1941 Bismark action during which the German battleships captain, Admiral Gnther Ltjens, took 16-inch gunfire from HMS Rodney. Also, the USS Massachusetts (BB-59) fired her 16-inch guns against the Vichy French squadron of Admiral Franois Michelier on 8 November 1941 at Casablanca.
In Contact continued on page 68

Frederick C. Leiner
I read with interest Americas First Strike Against Terrorism, a well-written account of the retaliatory strike against Libya. Commander Stanik makes only a brief reference to the fact that few allies would support the mission, but the map of the F-111Fs Long Round-Trip shows the effect of their unwillingness to support the United States; when France, Italy, and Spain forbade American warplanes to overfly their territories, the F-111s had to fly a circuitous route of double the distance, complicating the mission. In light

ApRIL 2011

Naval History News

Shipwreck Yields Possible Blackbeard Blade
Archaeologists working on a shipwreck off the North Carolina coast announced in January that they may have discovered a truly iconic relic of pirate lore: the sword of Blackbeard. The swordor rather, its fragmented remains, including a gilded hilt and pommel and parts of the broken, encrusted bladecomes from a wreck site presumed to be that of the Queen Annes Revenge, Blackbeards flagship, which ran aground in 1718 and was found in 1996. A North Carolina Office of State Archaeology team has been researching the wreckage for more than a decade. Arguably the most notorious pirate in history, Edward Blackbeard Teach (or Thatch) captured the 104-foot, 300-ton French slaver La Concorde off Martinique in November 1717. Releasing the enslaved Africans and the French crew on the Grenadine island of Bequia (after liberating the Frenchmen from the gold they carried), Blackbeard and company made La Concorde their own. With her armament beefed up to 40 guns and her decks now trod by a pirate crew of 150, the redubbed Queen Annes Revenge set forth on an eventful seven-month piracy rampage with the swaggering, fearsomelooking Blackbeard in command. The pirates plundered ships from St. Vincent to Antigua, and in April 1718 they appeared off Honduras, where they captured the Jamaican sloop Adventure and added her to their motley flotilla. In May 1718, Blackbeard pulled off his most audacious piratical ploy ever, blockading the entire port of Charleston, South Carolina, and in a weeks time picking off eight or nine prizes sailing in and out of the harbor. A few days later, both the Queen Annes Revenge and Adventure ran aground off Beaufort Inlet, North Carolinaevidently a deliberate move by Blackbeard to strand the bulk of his crew and make off with a select few (and the loot). Before the year was out, Blackbeard himself would be dead, felled by five musketball wounds and more than 20 sword cuts in a battle off Ocracoke Inlet, North Carolina, on 22 November 1718. The private firm Intersal discovered what is believed to be the wreck of the Queen Annes Revenge in 1996. State-coordinated research efforts subsequently got under way. To date, tens of thousands of artifacts have been recovered from the site, including the recently announced sword find. According to researchers, the weapon appears to be of French or English origin and may have been an ornamental addition to a well-to-do gentlemans outfit. The swords ornateness has led some to make a stab of a guess that it was just the sort of prize item that a larger-than-life pirate captain such as Blackbeard, who characteristically bedecked himself with multiple pistols and blades at any one time, would claim for his own.

N.C. DEpARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES (WENDy WELSH)

The sword of a sea-rogue? This gilded hilt and blade remnants were discovered amid the wreckage of whats believed to be Blackbeards flagship.

Olympia Update: Beleaguered Ship West CoastBound?

In a new development in the ongoing effort to stave off the demise of the historic U.S. warship Olympia, a San Franciscoarea group announced in January that it was launching a campaign to relocate the vessel from its current philadelphia berth to San pablo Bay. The worlds oldest floating steel warship and the sole surviving naval vessel of the Spanish-American War, the Olympia served as Commodore George Deweys flagship at the Battle of Manila Bay. Her last official naval mission was to carry the body of the Unknown Soldier from France to the United States in 1921. The Olympia is steeped in historybut her recent history has been all about the struggle to survive. The aging cruiser, a National Historic Landmark, is in need of substantial and costly hull repairs to prevent her from sinking. Independence Seaport Museum in philadelphia, the Olympias home since 1995, has spent in excess of $5.3 million on maintenance, repair, preservation, and restoration over the years. But another $10 million is required to restore the hull and deck, and possibly as much as $20 million is required for a complete restoration. Unfortunately, the museum announced in February 2010 that it is not able to raise the money needed to dredge the penns Landing Marina, transport the Olympia to dry dock, and finance the repairs necessary to ensure she will remain afloat. Her fate grew more uncertain with talk last spring of sinking her and turning her into an artifical reef in the waters off Cape May, New Jersey. While various concerned groups endeavored to raise funds to save the ship, Independence Seaport was slated to close the Olympia to visitors for good last November. But the organization gave the ship a six-month stay of execution, with limited visitation hours during the time extension.

10

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Still, the Olympia remains in limbo and needs to find a new homeor maybe she needs to return to her original home. Enter the San Francisco contingent: the Navy Yard Association of Mare Island. The former naval-shipyard workers at the heart of the effort seek to bring the troubled ship back to her place of origin. She was built at San Franciscos Union Iron Works, launched in 1892, and then docked at Mare Island for outfitting. She returned to the same yard a number of times for repairs, and it was from there that, on 25 August 1895, she set a course for the Far East and her eventual rendezvous with history at the 1 May 1898 Battle of Manila Bay. The Mare Island group now joins others seeking raise the requisite funds to save the Olympia. At press time, Independence Seaport was slated to issue a bid request in February to organizations seeking to acquire the ship.

NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

The troubled Olympia may have a new lease on life, as a San Franciscobased group is hoping to bring the historic warship back to the place of her birth.

Naval History News continued on page 72

TirPiTz and The imPeriaL German naVy

Patrick J. Kelly
As both a definitive biography and detailed evaluation of the historiography of this period, Kelly has produced a compelling portrait of Tirpitz that balances the views of those scholars who have overestimated Tirpitzs rationality in political, social and military affairs with those who underestimated his opportunism. Keith Bird, author of Erich Raeder: Admiral of the Third Reich

hardcover $45.00

and the Imperial German Navy

Tirpitz
Patrick J. Kelly

The LasT CenTury of sea Power

VoLume 2
From Washington to Tokyo, 19221945
H. P. Willmott
H. P. Willmott is the finest naval historian and among the finest historians of any discipline writing today. His latest work further strengthens that richly deserved accolade. Bernard D. Cole, author of The Great Wall at Sea

hardcover $39.95

800-842-6796 iupress.indiana.edu
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

11

Flight Line
The Great War Catalyst

By Hill Goodspeed, Historian, National Naval Aviation Museum

aval aviations early development occurred largely insulated from the cataclysmic events that swept across Europe in 1914. While a handful of naval personnel in the United States experimented with and evaluated the Navys small collection of flying machines, half a world away nations were building sizeable aerial armadas and the press of combat was triggering dramatic technological and tactical developments in air warfare. That changed when America entered World War I. The ensuing 19 months brought unimaginable expansion in U.S.

Factory, to spur production by turning out designs of other manufacturers. By wars end the Navys aircraft inventory numbered 2,107 heavier-than-air types and 15 blimps; the outstanding designs included Curtiss flying boats, which would serve into the mid-1920s, and the DeHavilland DH-4, which flew raids over Belgium with the Northern Bombing Group. Those planes operated from scores of coastal air stations in France, Italy, and the British Isles, as well as locales such as North Island in San Diego

before Americas entry into the war formed the First Yale Unit and financed their own flight training in preparation for service in the U.S. Navy. Thus, hundreds got to experience Ensign Wayne Duffetts feeling of taking to the skies: About three days ago I had my first flight. . . . Where the big sensation comes is when you go over the hump [start to descend]. All of a sudden you pitch down and the first thing you know you are once more gliding over the water. Oh, it is the greatest sensation you can imagine. Duffett would successfully

ALL PHOTOS: U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PHOTO ARCHIVE

American-built Curtiss HS pusher flying boats were based at 10 of the 16 U.S. naval air stations in France. Left: After shipment from America, HSs are reassembled at NAS Brest. Right: Navy pilots pose in front of their HS-1s at NAS Trguier in Brittany.

naval aviation, providing a foundation for a more prominent postwar place in the Fleet. Navy aviators claimed the distinction of being the first American combatants to land in France, when members of the First Aeronautic Detachment went ashore on 5 June 1917. But perhaps the most important naval aviation developments in World War I came far away from the front, with the building of the infrastructure to fight a world war. The Navy placed production contracts for aircraft on a scale never before seen and even established its own manufacturing plant, the Naval Aircraft

Bay; Key West, Florida; and Hampton Roads, Virginiastateside installations destined to play important roles in naval aviation for decades to come. From a handful of personnel in 1911 grew a robust force that by 1918 numbered in the thousands, including mechanics, gunners, and some yeomanettes, the first women to serve in naval aviation. Once the almost exclusive domain of graduates of the U.S. Naval Academy, the ranks of aviators expanded during wartime to consist primarily of members of the Naval Reserve Flying Corps. Its core was a collection of Ivy Leaguers who even

receive his coveted wings of gold and head overseas, joining others serving Over There. Arriving on foreign shores, U.S. naval aviation personnel served alongside British, French, and Italian aviators experienced in the ways of air warfare after months of fighting over the Western and Italian fronts. Similarly, the aircraft they flewSopwiths, Spads, Nieuports, Caproniswere true combat types, in contrast to the training aircraft to which the early American naval aviators were accustomed back in the States. Foreign instructors trained the newly arrived Yanks, and in some cases the
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

12

naval aviators were assigned to foreign squadrons. Among them was Lieutenant David S. Ingalls, Naval Aviator No. 85, who became the U.S. Navys only fighter ace of World War I while flying with a squadron of Britains Royal Air Force. Ensign Charles Hammann earned the Medal of Honor for rescuing a fellow aviator shot down by Austrian fighters, and did so flying an Italian seaplane fighter from Naval Air Station porto Corsini, Italy. U.S. Navy and Marine fliers constituted the front ranks of the Northern Bombing Group, which was organized by the Department of the Navy for the purpose of attacking German U-boat support facilities and other military installations in Belgium. The unit eventually boasted day and night wings. Smaller efforts led up to the bombing groups first raid in force on 14 October 1918, against a Germanheld railroad junction. The wars end came before plans to carry out an aroundthe-clock bombing campaign could be executed. To be expected, given its early inventory of seaplanes, was U.S. naval aviations wide-ranging effort in antisubmarine warfare. The 43 air stations in operation by wars end, more than three-quarters of them on foreign soil, were primarily devoted to seaplane operations. The daily routine of many naval aviators consisted of long-range patrols over wide expanses of ocean in search of U-boats. On 25 March 1918, Ensign John F. McNamara, flying out of Royal Naval Air Station portland, England, became the first naval aviator to attack a German submarine while on patrol. He and his fellow airmen on both sides of the Atlantic logged some 3 million nautical miles in their war against the enemys undersea menace. An important byproduct of frontline experiences was the opportunity

Sailors service an H-16 flying boat at NAS Queenstown, Ireland. In addition to HSs, the large twin-engine H-16s flew antisubmarine patrols.

afforded naval officers to witness the advancements of naval aviation in Europe. Two innovations in particularthe aircraft-carrying ships operated by the British and the longrange German Zeppelins that executed strategic bombing attacks on Great Britainwere to have a far-reaching impact on postwar operations in the U.S. Navy.

From the Naval Institute Photo Archive During 2011 these and other photographs tracing the history of U.S. naval flight can be viewed at www.usni. org. Follow the Naval Aviation Centennial links. Slideshows change monthly.

David S. Ingalls, who left Yale University to serve as a naval aviator, became the Navys first fighter ace while flying a Sopwith Camel with No. 213 Squadron, Royal Air Force.

Leathernecks of the 1st Marine Aviation Force gather near their DeHavilland DH-4 bombers. The only U.S.-built land plane to see action in the war, the DH-4 arrived in the skies over Europe during the last months of the conflict.

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

13

Historic Aircraft
F
uring World War I U.S. naval aviators in Europe flew almost exclusively foreign-built aircraft, among them the Sopwith F.1 Camel. The Camel was one of the most successful fighters of the war, being flown by the British Armys Royal Flying Corps (RFC) and the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) as well as the U.S. Army and Navy.1 The biplane was fast, maneuverable, and reliable. British aviation historian Kenneth Munson wrote: Controversy over whether the Sopwith Camel or the [German] Fokker D.VII was the finest fighter aircraft of World War I will probably always persist; but the

B N A
OF THE

, SHIPS AND AIRCRAFT U.S. FLEET

C
mid-1917. It was an immediate success as a fighter, scout, close air support, and bomber aircraft. In addition to the twin Vickers (with up to 600 rounds of ammunition), the Camel could carry four 24-pound bombs or two 40-pound phosphorous bombs. Alternatively, a 112-pound high-explosive bomb could be carried aloft. But it was as a fighter that the Camel achieved renown, with a single victory making it world famous. On 21 April 1918, the famed German fighter ace Baron Manfred von Richthofenthe Red Baronwas killed when his Fokker Dr.I was shot down by a Camel piloted by Captain Roy Brown of No. 209 Squadron, Royal Air Force.3 Victories shipboard use. This may have been the first aircraft developed for that role. The 2F.1 variant had only one hump-mounted Vickers .303 machine gun, to the left of the centerline, and featured a Lewis .303 machine gun fitted above the upper wing (with a 47- or 97-round magazine). For shipboard use, it had a shorter wingspan and a two-piece fuselage, joined behind the cockpit so it could be broken down for stowage. An extra fuel tank took the place of the right-side hump gun. On the morning of 19 July 1918, the pioneer British carrier Furious, in company with a force of light cruisers and destroyers, launched two flights of 2F.1 Camels against the Zeppelin sheds

J. M. CAIELLA

Aircraft A5658 was one of four ex-U.S. Army Camel F.1s transferred to the Navy along with two 2F.1s. The aircraft depicted was flown by Lieutenant Commander Edward O. McDonnell when he made the first flight from an American battleship in March 1919.

Sopwith F.1 Camel

Type: Fighter/Fighter-bomber

at Tondern, Germany. The first flight of three aircraft bombed Length: 18 feet, 9 inches one of the large airship sheds. Of Wingspan: 28 feet the four aircraft in the second Camel is undisputed champion in Engine: various, 130-horsepower Clerget (typical) flight, one went down at sea terms of enemy aircraft destroyed, Maximum Speed: 113 mph when its engine failed, another its tallyduring only sixteen crashed shortly after takeoff, and months of operationsbeing 1,294 Armament: Two .303-caliber Vickers machine guns the third made a forced landing victories.2 Crew: Pilot in neutral Denmark. The fourth Developed from the earlierand Entered Service: June 1917 plane made it to Tondern and very successfulSopwith Pup, destroyed another Zeppelin the Camel had a conventional shed with its bombs. Each of the biplane appearance. A variety destroyed sheds had contained an airship; of engines powered the prototypes and were chalked up at a rapid rate by Camel the Zeppelins L.54 and L.60 thus fell early production aircraft, with ratings pilots, with aerial kills being scored victim to carrier air strikes. up to 150 horsepower. The aircrafts over England (German bombers and Only one plane from each flight was short nose and stocky fuselage featured Zeppelins), France, Italy, the Aegean, able to return to the Furious, and they a hump forward of the cockpit that Macedonia, and Russia. had to come down in the water alongside partially housed the aircrafts twin Vickers Among those Camel victories were because of problems with the landing .303-caliber machine guns, synchronized sixfive aircraft and one balloon procedure on the ships abbreviated to fire through the two-blade propeller. garnered by U.S. Navy Lieutenant David landing deck. As a result of the losses, the The hump undoubtedly led to the Camel S. Ingalls while flying with the No. 213 Admiralty decided against further carrier moniker, initially an informal label that Squadron, RAF. He was the only U.S. strikes from the Furious. was later made official. Navy fighter ace of World War I. The effect of the raid on the Germans The first Camel was completed on 22 The Royal Navy flew the F.1 but was considerable. Airship historian December 1916, and the RFC and RNAS sponsored the 2F.1often called Douglas Robinson wrote: Until the began receiving production aircraft in the Ships Camelspecifically for

14

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Armistice the [German] Naval Airship Division lived in constant fear of a similar attack on one of the other bases . . . because of its exposed position, Tondern was maintained on a standby basis as an emergency landing ground only.4 Subsequently, 2F.1 Camels were launched at sea from another platform. It was Royal Navy practice for ships to tow to sea floatplanes that, when a Zeppelin was sighted, would be cut loose to take off and climb to attack. But floatplanes were too slow to intercept Zeppelins. RAF Colonel Charles R. Samson, who had been the first Royal Navy pilot to solo, proposed using a destroyer to tow a fighter to sea on a barge. When the warship reached full speed at more than 30 knots, the fighterfitted with skids for landing gearwould take off with a deck run of just a few feet. A barge was fitted with a flight deck and a device to lock the plane in place until the pilot had run its engine to maximum power. Colonel Samson had troughs built onto the deck to mate with the skids on the aircraft to guide the fighter in rough water. A 2F.1 was loaded on the modified barge and a destroyer towed the 40-foot carrier to sea. As the destroyer picked up speed, Samson climbed into the Camels cockpit. A crewmantethered to the barge with a line so he would not be blown overboardturned the planes propeller and the engine started at once. After Samson had warmed up the engine,

U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTe pHOTO ARCHIVe

Seven Camels launched from HMS Furious on 19 July 1918 flew the first carrier-borne strike against an enemy. They destroyed the Zeppelins L.54 and L.60 in their sheds at Tondern.

a signalman on the barge flagged the destroyer and the sleek ship held steady at 31 knots. Samson opened his throttle, and the Camel tugged at its restraining wire. He pulled the release toggle and the cable holding back the plane came loose. A moment later the plane was airborne . . . or almost so. The biplane started to leave the deck and then faltered. The skids apparently left their troughs and fouled a crossbar.

U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTe pHOTO ARCHIVe

On 31 July 1918, the Royal Navys second attempt to launch a Camel from a destroyer-towed barge proved successful. The fighter is seen just as it lifts off.

The plane fell into the water in front of the onrushing barge, which slammed into the airplane, pushing it and the pilot underwater. Luckily, Samson escaped from the wrecked plane and was plucked from the water, wet and frustrated but otherwise all right. The flight deck was modified so it would be horizontal when the barge was pulled at high speeds, another guide was constructed to keep the tail of the airplane up and straight for the first four feet of its run, and wheels replaced the skids. On 31 July, Flight-Sub-Lieutenant Stuart Culley successfully took off from a slightly longer, 58-foot barge. Then, on 11 August in the North Sea, Lieutenant Culley launched from a towed barge against the Zeppelin L.53. As the Camel climbed above 14,000 feet its controls got sluggish; at 17,000 feet the engine coughed. After gaining another 1,000 feet of altitude, Culley broke through a layer of clouds and found himself in bright sunshine some 200 feet below the German airship. But his plane would go no higher. pulling back on the control stick, Culley literally hung the Camel on its propeller until the plane was aimed straight at the airship. He then triggered the planes two machine guns. The Vickers jammed after seven rounds were fired; the Lewis fired a double drum of incendiary bullets into the Zeppelin. Bursts of flame shot from the L.53, and moments later its charred metal frame dropped into

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

15

the sea. Only one man three flights were made escaped, having bailed out from each ship during the from 19,000 feet, possibly a maneuvers. After taking off record for the time. the planes landed ashore. But now the young Six additional U.S. British pilot had problems. battleships were fitted As Culleys guns stopped with turret platforms and firing the Camel fell into takeoffs were made by a stall, dropping 2,000 feet British-built Camels and before he regained control. several other American With his fuel almost gone and foreign aircraft. The and the British task force last U.S. Navy flights from nowhere to be seen, Culley battleship gun turrets were headed toward the Dutch recorded in August 1920 coast. In the distance when the Navy ended its several fishing boats experimentation with that appeared, and he decided form of shipboard aviation. to put down near them. As Led by Sopwith, several he approached, the fishing British firms produced boats seemed to grow Camels during World War NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND in size until he realized Shrouded in tarps, a Camel is mounted at the end of its platform atop a fore turret I, with a total of 5,490 his mistake. They were being built. There was one of the USS Texas (later BB-35) in 1919, most likely around the time of its first destroyers! And, there purely American Camel: launch in March. were cruisers. It was the The late cartoonist Charles task force that had taken Schulz could magically (and him to sea. Culley brought his plane artistically) transform Snoopys doghouse to the United States (given numbers down on the water and was picked up. A into a Camel fighter for millions of A5658, A5659, A5729, A5730) and two derrick salvaged the fighter. newspaper readers of his comic strip. 2F.1 models (A5721, A5722). British naval historian S. W. Roskill The Camels career was relatively brief, Platforms were erected over a 14-inch wrote of the destruction of the L.53: with the last combat flights probably flown gun turret of the U.S. battleship Texas So ended an undertaking which Culley by Poles against the Russians in 1920. The (later BB-35) while the ship was in himself called an excellent example of success and popularity of the aircraft was England in November 1918; later a cooperation between the Royal Navy and summed up by one anonymous wit who platform was added atop another turret the very new-born Royal Air Force. declared: It became so famous that the at the New York Navy Yard. The first But . . . it has also a wider significance Arabs named an animal after it.6 takeoffs from the Texas were not made, in terms of history, for it was almost however, until fleet maneuvers in the certainly one of the very first instances Caribbean the following spring with 1. Four U.S. Army Air Service aero squadronsthe 17th, 41st, 148th, and 185thused the Camel. of a successful air interception by a shiptwo Camels, a Hanriot HD-2, and a The aircraft is described in great detail in H. F. borne fighter aircraft.5 Sopwith 1-Strutter assigned to the ship. King, Sopwith Aircraft 19121920 (London: Putnam, The first flight was made by Lieutenant The British also experimented with 1980), pp. 146178. Commander Edward O. McDonnell in a launching Camels from temporary 2. Kenneth Munson, Aircraft of World War I (London: Ian Allan, 1967), p. 108. Camel on 10 March 1919, while the ship platforms atop gun turrets on battleships 3. The Royal Flying Corps and Royal Naval Air was at anchor in Guantnamo Bay, Cuba. and cruisers. This scheme caught on Service were merged on 1 April 1918 to form the A similar platform was erected on with the U.S. Navy and after the war six independent Royal Air Force. Claims for the downthe battleship Mississippi (later BB-41), ex-U.S. Army Camels were transferred to ing of von Richtofens aircraft are many and include and she operated a Hanriot HD.1. In all, the Navy: four F.1 aircraft brought back an unknown infantry rifleman of the Australian
51st Battalion and Sgt C. B. Popkin, a Vickers gunner with the 24th Machine Gun Company, 4th (Australian) Division. 4. Douglas H. Robinson, The Zeppelin in Combat: A History of the German Naval Airship Division, 19121918 (Henley-on-Thames: G. T. Foulis, 1962), p. 321. 5. Capt. S. W. Roskill, RN, The Destruction of Zeppelin L.53, U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings (August 1960), p. 78. Culleys Camelserial N6812subsequently was placed in the Imperial War Museum, London. 6. King, Sopwith Aircraft 19121920, p. 178.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES

Tow-tractors are a product of their time. In April 1920, a horse-drawn caisson worked perfectly well at Santa Cruz, California, to move a 2F.1.

Norman Polmar is a columnist for Proceedings and Naval History magazines. Among his 50 published books is the two-volume Aircraft Carriers: A History of Carrier Aviation and Its Influence on World Events (Potomac Books, 2006, 2008). U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

16

As the master craftsman who opened the famous Lincoln Pocket Watch in Washington, D.C., I recently reviewed the Stauer Meisterzeit timepiece. The assembly and the precision of the mechanical movement are the best in its class.
George Thomas Towson Watch Company

We Can Only Find One

A rare chance to claim a unique piece of watchmaking history for under $100!

ighty-six years ago, a watchmaker in Paris famous for building the magnificent clocks at Versailles created a legendary timepiece. He invented the first watch with an automatic mechanical drive. These innovative movements required no batteries and never needed to be manually wound. Only seven of these ultra-rare watches were ever made and weve studied the one surviving masterpiece in a watch history museum. Inspired by history, classic design and technology, our Stauer Meisterzeit has been painstakingly handcrafted to meet the demanding standards of vintage watch collectors. Why the new antique is better than the original. The original timepiece was truly innovative, but, as we studied it closely, we realized that we could engineer ours with a much higher level of precision. The 27-ruby-jewel movement utilizes an automatic self-winding mechanism inspired by a patent from 1923, but built on $31 million in state-of-the-art Swiss-made machinery. With an exhibition back, you can see into the heart of the engineering and view the rotor spinits powered by the movement of your body.

This limited edition Stauer Meisterzeit allows you to wear a watch far more exclusive than most new upscale models. Here is your chance to claim a piece of watchmaking history in a rare design that is priced to wear everyday. Elegant and accurate. This refined beauty has a fastidious side. Each movement and engine-turned rotor is tested for 15 days and then certified before it leaves the factory. The best part is that with our special price, you can wear a superb classic historical reproduction watch and laugh all the way to the bank. Stauer specializes in View the precision classic timeless movement of the watches and Meisterzeit through the rear exhibition port. jewelry that are made for the millionaires who want to keep their millions. This watch will quickly move to heirloom status in your household.

Try it for 30 days and if you are not thrilled with the beauty and construction of the Meisterzeit, simply return it for a refund of the purchase price. Extremely limited availability. Since it takes about 6 months to build each watch, the release is a limited edition, so please be sure to order yours soon.
WATCH SPECS: - 14K Gold-clad case and bezel - Precision 27-jeweled movement - Interior dials display day and month - Croc-embossed leather strap - Fits 6 3/4"8 1/4" wrist

Exclusively Through Stauer

76% OFF

Stauer Meisterzeit II Watch$495

Now only $99 +S&P Save $396!

1-888-324-4351
Promotional Code MZW370-03
Please mention this code when you call.

Call now to take advantage of this limited offer.

Stauer

Dept. MZW370-03

14101 Southcross Drive W., Burnsville, Minnesota 55337

www.stauer.com

Smar t LuxuriesSurprising Prices

Conundrum
BY CRAIG L. SYMONDS

The

Sumter

On his first day in office, President Abraham Lincoln faced one of his most vexing problems: Should he dispatch a naval expedition to resupply the besieged garrison at Fort Sumter, or simply withdraw the force?

18

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

ne hundred and fifty years ago, the United States faced the greatest crisis in its history. Following Abraham Lincolns election as President on 6 November 1860, seven states declared their secession from the Union and laid claim to all U.S. government property within their territories. Public attention had fallen on one particular Federal possession: the not-yet-finished masonry-and-brick fort in the middle of Charleston Harbor that had been named for the Carolina Gamecock, General Thomas Sumter, a hero of the American Revolution. The simple fact that Fort Sumter was on an island necessarily meant that almost any solution to the growing crisis would involve the U.S. Navy. Lincoln did not seek or expect a military solution. He had no intention of forcing the issue, believing as he did that the majority of Southerners retained some latent loyalty to the old flag and that they had simply been swept up by the emotion of the moment. He hoped that a period of quiet resolve would bring most of them to their senses and allow a national reunification without the shedding of blood. Time, he hoped, would be the great healer.1 But time was exactly what Lincoln did not have. On his first full day in office, 5 March 1861, he read a letter from Major Robert Anderson, the commanding officer of Fort Sumters small garrison. In that letter, Anderson informed the new President that he was running out of food for his garrison and their dependents, which included families plus a number of construction workers. Worse, from Lincolns point of view, Anderson wrote that it would require 20,000 well-trained troops to mount the kind of campaign required to bring him the needed supplies. It was an undisguised plea to withdraw him and his garrison from their untenable and dangerous situation. Only the day before, in his inaugural address, Lincoln had pledged to the country that he would hold, occupy, and possess all Federal property within the seceded states. To withdraw Anderson and his garrison from Sumter now would mean beginning his administration with a violation of that pledge. The Situation at Sumter Even if one granted the legitimacy of secession which Lincoln did notthe ownership of Fort Sumter was ambiguous. It had been authorized by Congress, paid for with Federal tax dollars, and built by the U.S. Army

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

During the Fort Sumter crisis, President Abraham Lincoln, pictured at left in a photo taken in the spring of 1861, sought for the United States to avoid being perceived as the aggressor. The Confederacy assumed that role when it eventually bombarded the fort.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

19

Corps of Engineers on a man-made island constructed of granite blocks shipped to Charleston from New England. To be sure, the fort itself was in South Carolina waters, but South Carolina had no more to do with its financing or construction than any other state. Yet somehow during the lame-duck period of James Buchanans failed presidency, it had become the touchstone in the argument over South Carolinas sovereignty and therefore of secession itself. That public attention made it a symbol of both Lincolns effort to confirm the permanence of the Union, and the Southern effort to assert its independence. There were actually three Federal forts in Charleston Harbor: Sumter; old Castle Pinckney, watched over by a single ordnance sergeant; and Fort Moultrie on Sullivans Island, which was the home of the installations small U.S. garrison. When South Carolina Governor William Henry Gist pledged he would make no effort to occupy the three forts if the Federal government promised it would not
Cooper River Charleston

Mount Pleasant Mount Pleasant Battery

Sul

Castle Pinckney Ashley River

the South Carolina militia. Anderson and his men were, in effect, hostages in their own fort. And so, despite Buchanans agreement, Anderson resolved to move his garrison from the untenable Fort Moultrie to the more isolated, though still unfinished, Fort Sumter. He did so secretly on the night on 26 December, six days after South Carolina formally declared its separation from the Union. South Carolina authorities felt betrayed and insisted that Andersons clandestine move was a violation of their agreement. It was not quite a reinforcement of the garrison, for there were no additional U.S. Soldiers in Charleston Harbor after the move, but unquestionably the redeployment did strengthen Andersons position, for his men were no longer directly under the gazeand the effective control of local authorities. Southerners accused Buchanan of bad faith and demanded he order Anderson back to Moultrie. In the meantime, South Carolina troops occupied the abandoned fort as well as Castle Pinckney. For once Buchanan stiffened. He had agreed not to send reinforcements to Charleston, and he hadnt. Buchanan noted that Anderson commanded all three of the Charleston forts and that he had simply moved his command from one to another, which was entirely within his authority. d
li s van Isla n

First Shots Fired

Fort Moultrie Fort Johnson James Island Fort Sumter Cummings Point

Charleston Harbor
12 April 1861
0 Miles 1

Star of the West Battery

Confederate Battery
K. ERLINGER

strengthen or reinforce them, President Buchanan accepted the arrangement, though at the time no one questioned exactly what it meant to strengthen the forts. Buchanans pro-Southern Secretary of War, John B. Floyd, who later became a Confederate general (though a very bad one), handpicked Anderson for the command of the Charleston forts mainly because the officer was a Kentuckian and a slaveholder (or at least his wife was a slaveholderthe slaves were in her name) and because he was a consummate professional who would follow orders. But Anderson believed that part of being a professional soldier was displaying responsibility down as well as obedience up and that he owed it to his men to ensure their safety. So long as he remained in Fort Moultrie, the 8 officers, 61 men, and 13 musicians of his command were entirely dependent for their security on the forbearance of

Apparently rather liking the feeling of standing up for the government he putatively headed, Buchanan decided that he would next send Anderson reinforcements and supplies. In January 1861, he dispatched the chartered and unarmed civilian steamer Star of the West with 200 Soldiers plus a cargo of food and medical supplies to Charleston Harbor. The South Carolinians opened fire on her on 9 January, the first shots being fired from a battery on Morris Island that was manned by cadets from The Citadel. They could easily have been the first shots of a civil war, but after several rounds flew past his ship and one caused minor damage, the Star of the Wests civilian skipper turned back. Reverting to more characteristic behavior, Buchanan chose to ignore the fact that the U.S. flag had been fired on. The event highlighted Andersons precarious position. With his heavy guns now mounted in Fort Sumter, he could have covered the Star of the Wests approach with counterbattery fire. But he knew if he did so, it would start a warthough with whom it is not clear, for the Confederacy did not yet exist. He had watched from the ramparts of the fort as shot after shot was fired at the Star of the West, which was flying not one but two American
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

20

flags. The major was on the verge of ordering supporting fire when the side-wheel steamer turned around. An angry Anderson demanded an explanation from the Charleston authorities for why the U.S. flag had been insulted. The ensuing exchange of letters resulted in a new agreement in which both sides pledged not to upset the status quo. And so Charleston Harbor slipped into a tense armistice that lasted six weeks, from mid-January until Lincolns inauguration. During that period, Anderson sent regular updates to Washingtonthe U.S. mail and the telegraph were still working. If those reports were read at all, they had no influence on policy, for Buchanan was determined to do nothing to rock the boat before he left office. Lincoln Seeks Opinions Those were the circumstances on 5 March when Lincoln read the latest of Andersons status reportscarefully numbered no. 58in which he reported that his garrison was about to be starved out of its position and that it would take 20,000 men to relieve him. Lincoln first turned to the 74-year-old General of the Army, Brevet Lieutenant General Winfield Scott. Scott told him that ships could not get into Charleston Harbor past all the batteries that the Rebels had erected and that capturing the batteries would require the 20,000 men Anderson had asked for as well as several months of siege work. That was more time than Anderson, or for that matter Lincoln, had. The next place Lincoln went for advice was his Cabinet. The assembled members expressed shock and surprise; until that moment, the precariousness of Andersons position was not widely The Fort Sumter standoff was front-page news in early 1861. This profile known or fully understood. Most of Lincolns ad- of Sumter commander Major Robert Anderson noted that a less able or visers instinctively declared that Anderson must more impressible officer would, beyond the possibility of a doubt, have be sustained. After all, if the secessionists were involved our country in a bloody fratricidal war. successful in driving the American flag from na- tional forts, the government might as well acquitugboats, loaded with both supplies and reinforcements and esce to a divided country. Lincoln had invited Scott to the escorted by warships, could run into Charleston Harbor at meeting, and the general patiently instructed them about night and deposit their cargo on Fort Sumters tiny wharf. It the military realities that made a successful relief expedition would be virtually impossible, Fox insisted, for secessionist to Fort Sumter impossible. batteries some three-quarters of a mile away, to hit such postmaster General Montgomery Blair, who was a West small, fast-moving targets.2 point graduate, was especially adamant that Sumter must Lincoln saw some drawbacks to the scheme. First of all, be held, and he subsequently introduced Lincoln to his sending a naval expedition into Charleston Harbor would brother-in-law, Gustavus V. Fox, who had an idea about almost certainly be perceived by secessionists as an aggreshow to do it. Fox had served as a naval officer for 15 years, sive act. Lincoln had promised in his inaugural address that left the Navy in 1853 to command mail steamers, and was The government will not assail you. You can have no now a private citizen. He suggested that New York City
LIBRARY OF CONGReSS

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

21

conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. Perhaps sensing the Presidents wariness, Blair suggested that at least Lincoln could send Fox to Charleston to talk with Major Anderson and assess the situation. Always willing to obtain more information, Lincoln agreed, though he made no commitment and was still leaning toward evacuation when he bade Fox farewell.3 Leaving Washington on 19 March, Fox traveled south by train through Virginia and the Carolinas, arriving in Charleston on the 21st. There, he met with South Carolinas new governor, Francis Pickens, who agreed to let him go out to Fort Sumter and talk with Anderson if Fox assured him that his visit was for peaceful purposes. With perhaps a qualm or two, Fox agreed. Murky View from the Fort Rowed out to Sumter after nightfall, Fox was able to give Anderson the good news that the government had granted him two brevet promotionsfrom major to colonelin recognition of his stalwart resistance. But the news did not lift the fort commanders gloomy outlook, for Anderson continued to believe that any naval expedition to resupply him was doomed. As he and Fox stood on the ramparts of Fort Sumter in the darkness, Anderson pointed out the silhouettes of new fortifications the Southerners had erected on every side. Fox, however, looked at the harbor defenses with different eyes and continued to believe that the batteries posed little threat to a small, fast-moving target at night. For him, the clincher came when the boat that had brought him out to Fort Sumter returned two hours later to ferry him back. Fox could hear the creak of the oarlocks, but the boat remained virtually invisible from the forts small pier until she almost touched the landing. If a small boat could not be seen from Sumter at 20 feet, how could it be seen from Fort Moultrie at three-quarters of a mile? Fox returned to Washington on 24 March more convinced than ever that he could reinforce the garrison with men, and supply it with provisions.4 Foxs information, as well as news from others who reported that there was no apparent latent Unionism in the state, led Lincoln to consider a rescue mission to Fort Sumter more seriously, but what finally changed his mind was a disturbing memorandum from Scott, who proposed that the government should evacuate both Sumter and Fort Pickens off Pensacola, Florida. The gratuitous advice was well outside Scotts authority as commanding general, for it was based on a political judgment, not on military circumstances. Still, its contents gave Lincoln a cold shock. Indeed, Scotts recommendation was nearly as distressing as the letter Lincoln had received from Anderson three weeks before. The public might eventually come to understand the evacuation of Fort Sumter as a military necessity, but Pickens was not under any immediate threat. To surrender both forts would signal a deliberate policy of accommoda-

tion, the same policy that had been pursued by Lincolns discredited predecessor.5 After a sleepless night, the President decided sometime on the morning of 28 March that he would hold both Fort Pickens and Fort Sumter, which meant that in addition to sending reinforcements to Pickens, he would have to authorize a naval expedition to provision Sumter as well. By then, however, time was running out. Anderson had already reported that he could hold out only until 15 April. Lincoln wanted the Sumter expedition to move by 6 April. Mounting the expedition at all proved almost too much for the young administration. Lincoln wanted Fox to command it, though he was no longer a naval officer, which caused some confusion. Moreover, gathering the naval forces needed for both Sumter and Pickens betrayed both a lack of clear channels of communication and a lack of coordination between government departments. The Powhatans Conflicting Orders On 1 April, Secretary of State William H. Seward showed up in Lincolns office with two middle-grade officers: Army Captain Montgomery Meigs and Navy Lieutenant David Dixon Porter. They had a plan, Seward told the President, to make certain of the security of Fort Pickens. All that was needed was to dispatch the Navy steamer Powhatanrecently returned to New York from Vera Cruz and decommissioned prior to undergoing repairsto escort a steamer loaded with a battalion of Soldiers down to the fort. Lincoln wondered if Seward had cleared the idea with Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles. Seward assured him that he would make it right with Mr. Welles. Thereupon, Lincoln gave permission for Porter to write out orders for the Presidents signature. They instructed the commandant of the Brooklyn Navy Yard, Captain Andrew Hull Foote, to prepare the Powhatan for sea for an undisclosed mission, and to replace her commander, Captain Samuel Mercer, with Porter. To keep the expedition secret from Southern spies, Porter wrote into Footes orders that under no circumstances was he to communicate to the Navy Department the fact that she is fitting out.6 But despite his promise, Seward did not make it right with Welles, nor did Seward know that Welles had already planned to use the Powhatan for Foxs expedition to Fort Sumter. Worse, Footes orders forbade the captain even to tell Welles that he was sending one of the nations few available steam warships off on a secret mission. Foote found that more than a little awkward, but because the order pledging him to secrecy was signed by the President himself, he perforce obeyed. As a result of all this, in the first week of April, Seward and Welles each planned a secret naval missionone to Fort Pickens, one to Fort Sumtereach expedition spearheaded by the same ship, and neither secretary was aware of the plans of the other.7
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

22

Not until 5 Aprilthe day before the expedition for Fort equate notice. He now told Lincoln that the administration Sumter was to departdid anyone begin to realize what must live up to that pledge. Welles argued that Seward had had happened. That morning, Welles telegraphed Captain no right to make such a pledge on behalf of the government Mercer his orders to take the Powhatan to Charleston where and the government had no obligation to live up to it. After he was to rendezvous with Fox on 11 April. Meigs comall, he pointed out, a key element of Foxs expedition was stealth. To notify the secessionists that an expedition was en plained to Seward by telegraph that Welles was interfering route jeopardized its potential for success and put Fox and with porters command of the Powhatan, and Seward went all those who sailed with him in increased peril. to Welles to straighten him out. The Navy Secretary was at Seward insisted, however, and, typically, Lincoln settled first baffled and then angered. porter had no command, he on a kind of compromise. He would send a notification to insisted. Mercer was in command of the Powhatan, and he Governor pickens, but only after the expedition had sailed. was under orders for Charleston. Not so, Seward declared. The note Lincoln sent stated that if local authorities did He claimed that the Powhatan was porters command and she not resist the resupply effort, the government would not was going to pensacola. Characteristically, Welles became land any reinforcements, but if they did resist, then both excited, and no doubt raised his voice. He demanded they supplies and reinforcements would be landed.11 go to the White House and talk to Lincoln.8 Though it was near midnight, Lincoln was still at his desk. He listened to both men and at first sided with Seward, declaring that the Powhatan was not among those ships intended for the Sumter expedition. Welles knew better. He rushed off to get copies of the orders, and after Lincoln read them, he agreed that Welles was correct. The Powhatan was to go to Charleston. The president ordered Seward to telegram porter in New York and tell him so.9 But Seward did not send the telegram until late the As the crisis heightened in early April, Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles ordered that the sidenext morning, and when he wheel frigate powhatan accompany a relief expedition to Sumter, while Secretary of State William did, all it said was that por- H. Seward persuaded President Lincoln allow the warship to escort a relief mission to Fort Pickens, ter was to give up the Pow- off Pensacola, Florida. hatan to Captain Mercer. It was signed SEWARD, but porter had different orders in his pocket that were signed It is impossible to know what Lincoln expected such a by the president. This is an unpleasant position to be in, message to accomplish. Many have argued that it was a dethe lieutenant told Foote. In the end porter decided that liberate ploy to compel the Rebel leaders to assume the burden of making a decision. According to this view, letting the Lincolns orders took precedence. I received my orders secessionists know that the expedition was en route forced from the president and shall proceed and execute them, them into a provocative act that cast the Union as the viche declared. Then he steamed out of New York Harbor and tim. And, indeed, that is what finally happened. But Lincoln headed off toward pensacola.10 may have had more modest expectations. At the very least, Crisis Comes to a Head the message would absolve him of making a treacherous asNor was that the end of the confusion. Lincolns decision sault on South Carolinaof being the aggressor, as he said to relieve Fort Sumter put Seward in an awkward diplomatic in his inaugural address. It was always possible that local position, because the Secretary of State had taken it on himauthorities might acquiesce in the sending of supplies, which self to promise Southern representatives that the government would prolong the crisis and allow more time for all sides to would make no attempt to reinforce Sumter without adfind a peaceful solution. To be sure, it might also provoke
NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

23

plied would violate the Confederacys claim to sovereignty. More afraid of looking weak than he was of starting a war, Davis ordered Beauregard to demand Andersons surrender. If that demand were refused, the general was to reduce the fort by gunfire. The first shot was fired just minutes after Fox, in the Baltic, reached the rendezvous ten miles offshore. That initial shot galvanized both sections. Political divisions in the North instantly dissolved, and Northerners rallied around their new President and the war to save the Union. The effect was just as powerful in the South, and for a time it appeared that Davis decision had provided the boost the nascent nation needed to solidify its cause. On the other hand, it is hard to resist the conclusion that if the Confederate President had simply protested Lincolns resupply effort in an angry note, labeled it as a violation of his inauguration pledge, and let the crisis play itself out, it would have bought the ConfedThe Union relief expedition to Sumter misfired when bad weather turned back tugboats that were eracy more time, cast Lincoln to ferry the supplies to the fort. However, Lincolns announcement to the besiegers that he planned in the aggressors role, and won sympathy abroad. Taking that to resupply the garrison led Confederate President Jefferson Davis to decide to force the forts course would have made it very surrender, and Southern guns opened fire in the early hours of 12 April. difficult, if not impossible, for Lincoln to initiate a subsequent war to save the Union without being, in fact, the aggressor. and carry the supplies to the fort, but though the Baltic Davis was, in short, a catastrophically bad decision. arrived at the rendezvous at 0300 on 12 April, the tugs never made it. Bad weather had thwarted them off New Jersey and the Carolina Capes and forced the boats to turn 1. The central argument of this essay is adapted from Craig L. Symonds, Lincoln back. Nor was the Powhatan there, for Porter was taking and His Admirals: Abraham Lincoln, the U.S. Navy, and the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter 1. her down to Fort Pickens. Two other U.S. Navy warships 2. Ibid., p. 11. did arrivethe Pawnee (see Historic Fleets, p. 66) and 3. Lincolns inaugural is in Roy P. Basler, ed., The Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 4 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), p. 261. Pocahontasbut without the tugs, nobody was quite sure 4. Symonds, Lincoln and his Admirals, p. 13. what to do next. While Fox and the two Navy captains 5. The cold shock quotation comes from the diary of Montgomery Meigs, General M. C. Meigs on the Conduct of the Civil War, American Historical Rediscussed their options, they heard the distant sound of view (January 1921), 26:300. cannon fire echoing out of Charleston Harbor. 6. Meigs to Seward, 1 April 1861, Lincoln Papers, Library of Congress; David The note Lincoln had addressed to Governor Pickens had Dixon Porter, Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War, (New York: Appleton, 1885), pp. 1315. arrived in Charleston on 8 April. By then the seven states that 7. Lincoln to Foote, 1 April 1861, Official Records of the Union and Confederate had seceded from the Union had organized themselves into Navies in the War of the Rebellion (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1894-1922) (hereinafter cited as ORN), ser. 1, vol. 4, pp. 1089. the Confederacy and appointed Brigadier General P. G. T. 8. Welles to Mercer, Rowan, and Gillis, 5 April 1861, ORN, ser. 1, vol. 4, pp. 2356; Beauregard as the area commander for Charleston. Pickens Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy under Lincoln and Johnson, ed. by Howard K. Beale (New York: W. W. Norton, 1960), undated entry, vol. 1, p. 24. therefore passed Lincolns note to Beauregard, who in turn 9. Gideon Welles, Diary, vol. 1, p. 24. passed it on to the Confederate government in Montgomery, 10. Seward to Porter, 6 April 1861, ORN, ser. 1, vol. 4, p. 112; Porter to Foote, ibid., pp. 11112. Alabama. In the end, therefore, it was Jefferson Davis, the 11. Gideon Welles, Facts in Relation to the Reinforcement of Fort Pickens in Confederacys Provisional President, who decided how to rethe Spring of 1861, Galaxy (January 1871), in Welles, Civil War and Reconstrucspond. He concluded that allowing Fort Sumter to be resuption, Selected Essays (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1959), p. 50. the secessionists to act, and in acting, assume the burden of starting hostilities. But Lincoln could not count on that, and for the most part he was feeling his way during this crisis. On 9 April, Fox headed south on the chartered steamer Baltic that carried most of the supplies. Two tugs from New York were supposed to rendezvous with him off Charleston
AMERICAN ANTIqUARIAN SOCIETY, WORCESTER, MA/THE BRIDGEMAN ART LIBRARY INTERNATIONAL

24

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Navys Evolutionary War

The
By Craig L. SymondS
26
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

During the Civil War, the U.S. Navy harnessed revolutionary technologies and designs and pioneered extensive joint operations with the Army along the Confederacys shores and on its rivers.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

he Civil War was essentially a land war. The Union won it because the Northern public proved willing to sustain the Lincoln administration through four long years of bloodshed and sacrifice, and the Confederacy lost it because it could not match Union superiority in manpower and industrial production. Still, naval forces on both sides, but especially on the Union side, affected the trajectory of the conflict, and very likely helped determine its length. Moreover, because the war took place during a time of dramatic changes in technology, it marked a milestone in the character of naval warfare itself. Even before the war began, wooden sailing ships firing solid shot from iron guns were giving way to steam-powered, propeller-driven iron warships firing explosive shells from much larger rifled guns. The best known example of this revolution during the conflict was the famous duel between the ironclads Virginia and Monitor on 9 March 1862 in Hampton Roads, Virginia, but the battle the day before was the real watershed, marking as it did the supremacy of iron over wood. On 8 March, the Confederate Virginia (formerly the Union screw frigate Merrimack) sank two wooden U.S. warships in a single day, inflicting on the Navy its worst defeat from its founding in 1775 until 7 December 1941. Wooden warships did not become obsolete, nor did the armored warship become the new universal standard, but the Battles of Hampton Roads unleashed the genie of technology. The changes were manifested in other ways as well, including a shift in the presumed balance of relative power between ships and forts. As the weaker naval power, the Confederacy was quicker to embrace many of the new innovations, including mines, David boats (essentially early pT boats), and even an operational submarine, the H. L. Hunley, which sank the Union screw sloop Housatonic off Charleston on 17 February 1864. But the South could not produce such novel weapons in the kind of numbers needed to change the balance of sea power, and from the beginning, the Confederacy all but conceded control of the sea to its foe. That put the U.S. Navy in the unfamiliar role of being the dominant naval power. In both the American Revolution and the War of 1812, the smaller U.S. Navy had necessarily avoided fleet engagements with its powerful enemy and relied instead on attacking British commercial shipping, a strategy known by its French name as guerre de course. The British had countered by attempting to blockade the

BEVERLEY R. ROBINSON COLLECTION, U.S. NAVAL ACADEMY MUSEUM

Three City-class gunboats bombard Fort Henry on 6 February 1862 as a Rebel shot bursts the smaller Essexs boiler. Innovative City-class ironcladsall seven built within three months and commissioned in January 1862would become the backbone of the Union effort to secure Western rivers.

ApRIL 2011

27

American coast both to interfere with trade and to prevent potential commerce raiders from getting to sea in the first place. In effect, the superior navy employed a blockade, and the weaker naval power turned to commerce raiding. That is also what happened in the Civil War; the Union Navy employed a blockade, and the Confederates turned to a guerre de course. In addition to the blockade, the U.S. Navy played a critical role on the Western rivers and conducted a determined, though only partially successful, pursuit of Confederate commerce raiders. Initial Blockade Problems President Abraham Lincolns declaration of a blockade on 19 April 1861, only four days after the surrender of Fort Sumter, was the administrations first important strategic decision, and from the very start there were two huge problems to be overcome. The first was legal. A declaration of a blockade was an act of war, and Lincolns pronouncement therefore seemed to grant belligerent status to the Confederacy. For his part, the President insisted that the Confederacy had no legal standingas far as he was concerned the conflict was simply a rebellion against the government. Consequently, a blockade declaration that seemed to acknowledge the Confederacy was something of an embarrassment. Lincoln and his Secretary of State, William H. Seward, tried to get around the implications of a formal blockade by announcing that domestic unrest in some of its Southern ports required the closing of them to commerce. This transparent subterfuge did not work, however, because the European powers recognized a blockade when they saw one. Besides, merely closing certain ports would not have allowed Union warships to patrol for blockade violators beyond the immediate coastline. In the end, the Union government had to accept the term blockade along with whatever it might imply about the legal status of the Confederacy.1 Lincolns declaration was one factor that led to the British decision to grant belligerency status (though not formal recognition) to the Confederacy. Initially, the United States saw that as a danger. In fact, the decision worked to the Union advantage since it meant that warships and privateers from both sides were barred from using British ports as bases. Though the British would stretch the meaning of neutrality to the near-breaking point during the war, Confederate commerce raiders remained barred from bringing their prizes into British portsincluding those in the West Indiesa circumstance that severely limited their effectiveness. The second problem with the blockade declaration was that according to international law, neutral powers did not have to respect a blockade unless the blockading power established a naval presence off every port that was declared to

be under blockade. You could not simply say that a coast was blockaded, you actually had to do it. And that was a problem for the Union because the Confederacy claimed a coastline of some 3,550 miles that was pierced by 189 harbors, inlets, and navigable river mouths. Clearly the Union Navys few score warships could not be physically present off all of those places at once. Indeed, at most of those ports and harbors a single ship would be wholly inadequate; at some of them it would require more than a dozen ships even to make a pretense of an effective force. Consequently, in spite of the fact that it was already greatly superior to its foe, the U.S. Navys first order of business was to expand exponentially to 5, 10, even 15 times its prewar strength. Most of the new ships were converted merchantmen. Sometimes all it took to turn a steam merchant ship into a man-of-war was strengthening the decks enough to enable them to sustain the weight of the naval ordnance and constructing a magazine below the water line. Those conversions took place at various Northern naval yards. During the course of the war, men working 12-hour shifts at the Brooklyn Navy Yard successfully refitted some 190 ships. In one exceptional case, workers transformed the merchant steamer Monticello into a warship in less than 24 hours.2 Seizing a Base of Operations The Norths ability to mobilize so many ships so quickly was a measure of its industrial and maritime supremacy over the South, but maintaining that force off a hostile coast for four years was equally challenging. Since all but a very few of the ships were steam poweredand therefore coal burningkeeping them on the blockade necessitated seizing and holding a number of bases along that coast where they could be refueled and resupplied. One of the first recommendations of the Blockade Strategy Board, established by Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles at the beginning of the war, was to secure two coaling stations along the South Atlantic coast. Initially, the board recommended Bulls Bay, South Carolina, and Fernandina, Florida, but after further consideration, the initial target was shifted to Port Royal, South Carolina. Port Royal became the objective for two reasons. First was its location between Charleston and Savannah, which would afford blockading squadrons at both those cities a convenient base. A second factor was Port Royals geography. Not only was it an enormous roadstead, large enough to accommodate the entire Union Navy, but also its swampy marshes separated the offshore islands from the mainland and protected occupying Union forces from a counterattack by the Rebel army. Flag Officer Samuel Francis Du Pont, who had chaired the Strategy Board, commanded the fleet that would conduct this first major operation against the enemy shore. He led a huge armada75 ships in allthe largest naval force
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

28

ever assembled under the American flag. En route to the ron with the base it needed to maintain the blockades of target, a terrible storm off Cape Hatteras scattered the fleet Charleston and Savannah. For the rest of the war, only all over the oceana few of the transports fetched up on Hampton Roads surpassed port Royal in importance as the coast of Ireland. Over the next several days, however, a Union naval base on the enemy coast. Indeed, it is most of the ships came in, one by one, and at 0900 on 7 hard to imagine how the North could have maintained its blockade of the South Atlantic coast at all without November 1861, Du pont led his warship squadron into possession of port Royal. The Union blockading fleet also port Royal Sound. relied on Key West, Florida, and Ship Island, near the Up to that point, conventional wisdom was that guns in mouth of the Mississippi River, as supply bases for the forts were superior to guns in ships. After all, ships were other squadrons. made of wood, and forts were usually constructed of stone. Forts often had bigger guns and an unlimited supply of ammunition. Finally and decisively, forts did not sink. As the New York Tribune had declared during the Fort Sumter crisis, ships are no match for land batteries.3 But those assumptions did not take into consideration recent dramatic changes in naval technology. Du ponts wooden steamers, led by the frigate Wabash, could remain in motion while firing; they could maneuver independent of the wind; and their new and much larger naval guns were more than a match for anything the Confederates had in either Fort Walker or Fort Beauregard, the two works guarding port Royal. Moreover, the forts were not masonry structures, like Fort Sumter in Charleston. They were log-and-dirt fortresses thrown up just a few months earlier and armed with mostly older, smaller artillery pieces. Du pont attacked the larger of them, Fort Walker, first. When the Union ships opened fire, the navigator on board the Wabash remembered that the air over the fort was filled with clouds of sand, splinters, and fragments of gun carriages and timbers. After three passes, the Federal gunners had disabled In late 1861, Rear Admiral Samuel Francis Du Pont became the wars first great U.S. most of the forts guns, and the defend- naval hero for capturing Port Royal Sound, South Carolina, a key base for Union ships ers were down to only 500 pounds of enforcing the blockade of the Confederacys South Atlantic ports. powder. Accepting the inevitable, the garrison struck its flag and abandoned The successful seizure of port Royal also affected Confedthe fort, as did Beauregards defenders, leaving the roaderate strategy. One interested observer of the engagement was stead in the hands of the Union. Du ponts destruction General Robert E. Lee, then acting as Confederate president of Fort Walker demonstrated that a squadron of modern 4 Jefferson Davis military adviser. Sent to South Carolina to steam warships was more than a match for such defenses. observe and report on coastal defense efforts, Lee concluded The Federal victory at port Royal had several important that the superiority of the Union Navy, its ability to move consequences. psychologically, the news was extremely quickly from place to place, and the impact of its heavy welcome in the North, which was still burdened by the guns meant that the South simply could not defend its coast incubus of the defeat at Bull Run that summer. Strategieverywhere. It would have to choose a handful of specific cally, it provided the South Atlantic Blockading SquadLIBRARY OF CONGRESS

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

29

sites that could be defended, and let the rest go by default. From then on, the Confederacy energetically defended only a half dozen key ports: Galveston, Texas; New Orleans, Louisiana; Mobile, Alabama; Savannah, Georgia; Charleston, South Carolina; and Wilmington, North Carolina. Most of the rest of the Confederate coast was subsequently occupied by Union forces that were supplied and maintained by sea because of Union naval superiority. Assessing the Blockades Effectiveness Southern supply bases greatly simplified the U.S. Navys job, but maintaining the blockade remained a challenging

vessels, almost always unarmed, then attempted to run into a blockaded port, usually at night. Blacked out and painted a dark gray, they sought to dash past Union warships without being sighted, or if they were spotted, to outrun their pursuers. Those that made it into port would later attempt to dash out to sea, usually loaded with cotton or other exports. Given the difficulty of spotting or catching them, it is not surprising that most of the ships that tried to run the blockade did so successfully. A more important factor, however, was that relatively few ships tried it. In the last full year of peace, some 20,000 ships entered or left Southern ports, but

NAVAL HISTOry & HErITAGE COMMAND

Painted gray, fast-steaming blockade runners such as the Vance, shown at Nassau, the Bahamas, in 1863, were difficult for Union warships to spot and then catch at night. After making more than 20 runs through the blockade, the Vances luck ran out on 10 September 1864 when she was captured off Wilmington, North Carolina.

and often thankless task. The general pattern of trade was for conventional cargo vessels from Europe to bring their goods to a neutral port such as St. George in Bermuda, Nassau in the Bahamas, or Havana, Cuba. There the cargoes were off-loaded into low, fast blockade runners. The

during the war, that number dropped to only 2,000 ships per year. Even more telling, cotton exports from the South dropped from just under 3 million bales a year before the war to just over 50,000 in the first year of the conflictless than 2 percent of the prewar total.5

Was

the

U.s. Navy Ready

foR

WaR

iN

1861?

By Craig L. Symonds

irtually every general history of the Civil War emphasizes how unprepared for war the United States was in 1861. If these books mention the Navy at all, they report that it was in more or less the same situation. After all, in 1861 the U.S. Navy had only 90 vessels listed on its Register of Ships, fewer than half of which (42) were capable of active service, and most of those were on distant stations from Brazil to China. Soon after he was inaugurated, President Abraham Lincoln asked his Secretary of the Navy, Gideon

Welles, what kind of naval force could be made available in case of war, and Welles named only 12 ships that could at once be put into service. Clearly that was not a Navy that was prepared to command the Souths coastline, impose an impervious blockade, pursue Confederate commerce raiders, fight on the Western rivers, and do all the other jobs it would be assigned in the forthcoming struggle. On the other hand, the catalog of inadequacy overlooks the fact that the

Civil War marked the culmination of an era of technological innovation that had a dramatic impact on the character of naval warfare. These innovations included the screw propeller, more efficient steam engines, rifled and banded naval guns, and exploding ordnance, among others. To employ the new technologies, the United States had authorized and built from the keel up no fewer than 24 major new combatants in the decade before the outbreak of war. It was the countrys
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

30

A precise calculation of just how much the Union blockade hurt the Confederacy is elusive. On the one hand, the South was able to import the essential matriel it needed to sustain its economy and war effortincluding 400,000 rifles, 3 million pounds of lead, and more than 2.2 million pounds of saltpeter for manufacturing gunpowder. Historian Stephen Wise is undoubtedly correct in concluding that without blockade running the nations military would have been without proper supplies of arms, bullets, and powder.6 On the other hand, the blockade had a cumulative eroding effect on the Southern economy and contributed to inflation and war weariness within both the civilian population and the Army, thereby undermining the Confederate war effort. As historian William H. Roberts put it, if the blockade was never airtight it was constricting enough that the South was constantly gasping for economic breath. It is likely that the Union would have won the war even without the blockade, as long as the Northern population sustained the Lincoln administration, but almost as surely the war would have lasted longer and been more costly. So it is possible to argue that the blockade probably saved many thousands of lives. 7 Advantages, Disadvantages on the Western Rivers After the blockade, the most important assignment for the Union Navy was on the rivers in the Western theater the region between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. Significantly, while the rivers in the East nearly all ran horizontally (as viewed on a map) and thus acted as barriers to any Union advance, rivers in the West mostly flowed vertically, either north to

south like the Mississippi, or south to north like the Tennessee and the Cumberland. As a result, the latter served as potential avenues for Union advances. Both sides knew that whoever commanded the Western rivers had a tremendous strategic advantage. As in the saltwater war, the Union had the benefit of possessing an industrial base that allowed it to produce more and better warships for use in the river war. Even before the transformation of the Merrimack into the Virginia or the construction of the Monitor, salvage expert James Buchanan Eads of St. Louis built a flotilla of small river gunboats that were armor plated and powerfully armed yet still capable of maneuvering in relatively shallow water. Major General William Tecumseh Sherman is said to have remarked admiringly that they could navigate in a heavy dew. The South, too, attempted an ironclad-building program for the Western rivers and laid down two big ironclads at New Orleans and two more at Memphis. In the end, however, the Confederacys inferior industrial base and the rapid conquest of both of those Southern cites derailed the effort. Only one of the four ironclads was ever completed (the CSS Arkansas), and for the most part, the South had to depend on shore fortifications to try to prevent Union

largest peacetime naval expansion since the Naval Act of 1816. Because of that, though the 1861 Navy was relatively small, it contained a disproportionate number of new, up-to-date warships that gave it an insurmountable superiority over its Southern foe. The first ships of this dramatic expansion were five Merrimack-class screw (that is, propeller-driven) frigates, all named for American rivers and therefore sometimes called River-class frigates. (The others were the Wabash, Minnesota, Roanoke, and Colorado. Included in this same authorization was a sixth frigate, the Niagara, which was somewhat differently designed, being longer
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

WABASH LeAViNg NeW YoRk foR the SeAt of WAR, BY EdWARd MORAN, NAVY ART COLLECTION, NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMANd

the Merrimack-class screw frigate Wabash leaves New York harbor on 30 May 1861 for duty as flagship of the Atlantic Blockading Squadron. Although the U.S. Navy needed to expand enormously to meet the demands of war, the presence in the fleet of modern warships such as the Wabash gave it a solid core to build around.

with sharper lines and having fewer guns.) Superficially, at least, they looked very much like sailing frigates of an earlier age. Nevertheless, they were steam-powered and

propeller-driven and boasted an impressive armament consisting entirely of shell guns. When the Merrimack visited English ports in 1856-57, her powerful battery so impressed

ApRIL 2011

31

armies from using the axes of the rivers as avenues of advance. They initially erected a defense linethe so-called long Kentucky linefrom Island Number Ten on the Mississippi to the Cumberland Gap, more or less approximating the Tennessee-Kentucky border. The ensuing Union campaign to break this line pitted Union ironclad warships backed by land forces against Confederate fortifications. One problem the Union had in executing its campaign was that there was no existing protocol for joint operations in the 19th centuryno Department of Defense or Joint Chiefs of Staff. There was simply no such thing as a Joint Command in either the North or the South. The ability of generals and admirals to work effectively together depended entirely on the willingness of the commanders to cooperate. After some confusion in the early months of war, what emerged was an arrangement in which the Union Army retained strategic control of operations within the Western theater, and U.S. Navy officers exercised tactical command of their ships and squadrons. Even then, however, it became clear that the key to Union success on the Western rivers was the willingness of Army and Navy officers to work together, because neither could give orders to the other. Key Early Victories The first trial came at Fort Henry on the Tennessee River. Brigadier General Ulysses S. Grant, in his first important operation, and Flag Officer Andrew Hull Foote combined to break through a key position in the long Kentucky line. Footes ironclad gunboat flotilla carried Grants troops to a point just above Fort Henry, and then took the fort under fire from the river as Grants Soldiers advanced overland. As it happened, the Confederate commander at Henry, Brigadier General Lloyd Tilghman, recognized the vulnerability of his position and evacuated his infantry, choosing to defend the fort with his artillery alone. In the ensuing gun duel, Footes
the British that they began planning a new class of steam warships of their own. Southerners complained that the Merrimacks were so large (they drew more than 23 feet) they were unable to operate in shallow Southern ports. In 1856, therefore, President Franklin Pierces Navy Secretary, James C. Dobbin, went back to Congress to urge the construction of another new class of warships: smaller, shallower-draft steam sloops, and the first U.S. Navy warships to have twin screws. The ships were named for American cities. The first and the namesake of the class was the Hartford, which during the Civil War became famous as the flagship of David Glasgow Farragut. (The others were the Richmond, Brooklyn, Pensacola,

four ironclads overwhelmed the fortress batteries, and Fort Henry capitulated before Grants men could arrive. Footes gunboats then steamed past the fort, seven miles upriver to destroy the railroad bridge over the Tennessee River, thereby cutting a crucial east-west link for the Confederacy. That compelled two Confederate armies to evacuate not only all of Kentucky, but most of Tennessee as well. If the Navy won the honors at Fort Henry, the Army had its turn at Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River, only a days march east of Henry and the linchpin of Confederate defenses in the West. There, Footes gunboats proved far less formidable, because Donelson was situated on higher ground and its defenders could fire their artillery down into the vessels on the river with plunging fire. This time it was Grants army that compelled the surrender of the Rebel fort, on 16 February 1862. Army-Navy cooperation proved more efficient in the Union campaign against Island Number Ten on the Mississippi River in April. The island, so named because it was the tenth island in numbered sequence from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, was the site of the principal Confederate defense of the Mississippi. Protected by an impassable marshland to the east and the river itself to the west, the fort was secure from a conventional overland attack except from the south. Union forces could assail the Rebel defenses only if the Navy could somehow get past the Confederate fortifications on the island to escort Union troops across the river. On 4 April, Commander Henry Walke, captain of the ironclad Carondelet, volunteered to run his ship past the enemy batteries. Foote was skeptical but gave his permission. Despite a harrowing journey, Walke made it, and his example inspired a second run by the Pittsburg two nights later. The two gunboats then escorted the army of Major General John Pope across the river to the Confederate
Narragansett.) Though these smaller ships also carried masts and spars, their sail pattern was much reduced, and they were the first warships in American history to be classified as genuine steam warships rather than auxiliary steamers. Thus it was that between 1854 and 1859that is, between the KansasNebraska Act and John Browns raid on Harpers Ferrythe U.S. Congress authorized funds for three new classes of steam-powered, propeller-driven warships, as well as a handful of others24 altogether. These timely appropriations enlarged and modernized the U.S. Navy so that it can be fairly argued that the service was better prepared for war in 1861 than for any previous war.
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

and Lancaster.) Launched in 1858, the Hartford drew only 18 feet of water, which allowed her and her sister ships to enter most Southern ports where the bigger Merrimacks could not go. This pleased Southerners, though once the war started they were less pleased. During the conflict, the Hartford, as well as the Richmond and Brooklyn, would steam up the Mississippi to Vicksburg and fight her way into Mobile Bay. The same year the Hartford was launched, Congress appropriated money for yet a third type of new steam warships. The first of these screw steamers, the Mohican, was launched only a year later, in 1859. (The others were the Pawnee, Wyoming, Iroquois, Dacotah, Seminole, and

32

rear to achieve a nearly bloodless victory. It was a model of effective joint operations. Neither the Army nor the Navy working alone could have pulled it off, but working together they made it look easy. From the Crescent City to Vicksburg

That same month, 500 miles to the south as the river flows, Flag Officer David Glasgow Farragut ran his oceangoing warships past the forts on the lower Mississippi that protected the city of New Orleans. Farraguts feat was particularly significant because the Rebel fortifications were not quickly erected dirt-and-log forts, like those at port Royal or Island Number Ten, but large masonry structures; between them, Fort Jackson (on the western bank) and Fort St. philip (on the eastern side) boasted a total of 128 heavy guns. Nevertheless, on 24 April Farraguts wooden oceangoing warships steamed through an opening cut in a log-and-chain boom across the Mississippi and took the forts under fire. Fourteen of the vessels successfully ran the gauntlet against the rivers current, and easily dispatched the small squadron of Confederate warships that came out to contest their passage, Farragut proceeded up to New Orleans, anchored off Jack- Sailors and stevedores on Baton Rouges riverfront wait to coal Rear Admiral David G. Farraguts season Square, and demanded going warships, at anchor in the background. Farragut took his fleet up the Mississippi past Vicksburg the citys surrender. New before it helped subdue the Confederacys last bastion on the river, Port Hudson, Louisiana. Orleans was the largest city and most important seaport in the Confederacy, and its fall so early in the war was a some venues than others. Bickering between Union Army tremendous blow to Southern hopes. and Navy commanders at Charleston continued throughout With command of the lower Mississippi, Farragut steamed a siege that lasted more than two years, and in the end, the upriver past Baton Rouge to Vicksburg. But he could not city fell only when it was threatened by Shermans army capture the city. As Farraguts foster-brother Commander marching north from Savannah in February 1865. David Dixon porter archly noted, ships cannot crawl up The Union assault on Mobile, Alabama, was also a joint hills 300 feet high. As at Island Number Ten, the key to operation, though the city was effectively neutralized as eventual Union success at Vicksburg was the cooperation a haven for blockade runners when Farragut damned the of Union Army and Navy commanders. Fortuitously, the torpedoes and ran past Fort Morgan into Mobile Bay on triumvirate of Grant, Sherman, and porter, who took com5 August 1864. In December 1864, the first joint Union mand of the Mississippi Squadron of gunboats in September assault on Fort Fisher, which guarded the port of Wilming1862, proved to be a model of cooperation, especially when ton, North Carolina, failed in large part because of mistrust contrasted with the confusion and disagreement that charbetween the Union Army and Navy commanders, Major acterized the Confederate high command in the West. General Benjamin Butler and nowRear Admiral porter. In April 1863, when Grant asked porter to run his squadron However, a second attempt in January 1865, with Major past the Vicksburg batteries, the naval officer agreed to do it. General Alfred H. Terry replacing Butler, proved successful.
LIBRARY OF CONGReSS

He did not have to; Grant could not order it. But porters gunboats nevertheless steamed through heavy Confederate gunfire on 16 April and subsequently escorted Grants army across the river. After a harrowing march into Mississippi, several battles, and a 47-day siege, Vicksburg fell on 4 July. Once again, Grant could not have done it without the Navy, nor could porter have had done it without Grant. It was a case of the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. Cooperation proved essential, too, in the Union effort to close down the last of the important Confederate ports along the Atlantic coast: Charleston, Mobile, and Wilmington. At each of these places a joint effort was essential to Union success, though cooperation was more evident at

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

33

One was the Alabama. In a classic ship-to-ship duel on 19 June, the Kearsarge, commanded by Captain John Winslow, sank the raider off Cherbourg, France. In October the Wachusett, under Commander Napoleon Collins, captured the Florida in the neutral port of Bahia, Brazil. The sinking of the Alabama triggered unalloyed celebration in the North, but the seizure of the Florida caused some embarrassment. Collins had flagrantly attacked the Florida in a neutral port, and for that he was subsequently found guilty at a court-martial and sentenced to be dismissed from the Navy. Months later, however, after tempers had cooled and the war had ended, he was quietly restored to duty. The last of the Rebel raiders was Commander James I. Waddells CSS Shenandoah. After savaging the Norths Pacific whaling fleet in the spring and summer of 1865, Waddell learned that the war had ended in May. Fearing reprisal for the captures he had made after that, he directed the Shenandoah back to England, where her flag was hauled down in November 1865, the last Confederate surrender of the war. The Union did not win the Civil War because of its naval superiority, but it was an important element in the victory. The blockade created shortages and hardship within the Confederacy and effectively cut off the nascent nation from the rest of the world. The Navy was a full partner in the straThe CSS Shenandoah, last of the Rebel commerce raiders, returns to Liverpool, england, to surtegically important victories in render. Although they bouyed Southern morale, Confederate cruisers could not challenge the u.S. the Western theater that split Navys superiority at sea and failed to seriously damage Northern maritime commerce. the Confederacy nearly in half. For all their success, the handful of Rebel commerce raiders could not threaten Union naval Over the course of two years (July 1862June 1864) Semmes superiority or change the wars outcome. In the end, despite and the Alabama captured and burned no fewer than 64 such innovations as ironclads, mines, and even a submarine, Union merchant ships and sank one Union warship, the the South simply found itself overmatched at sea. Hatteras. Northern merchants were horrified by the success of these pirates, as they were called in the Northern press. The New York Chamber of Commerce pressed Welles to 1. Craig L. Symonds, The Civil War at Sea (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2009), p. 34. 2. Craig L. Symonds, The Economics of Civil War: Money, Manufacturing, and establish convoys to protect American shipping. Convoys Commerce, in Harold Holzer, ed., Lincoln and New York (New York: New-York might well have worked, but the concept was unpopular Historical Society, 2009), p. 87. 3. Can Fort Sumter be Taken? New York Tribune, reprinted in Washington Conwith professional Navy men, and Navy Secretary Welles stitution, 14 January 1861. rejected the idea. He could not inaugurate a convoy system 4. John D. Hayes, The Battle of Port Royal, S.C. from the Journal of John Sanford Barnes, October 8 to November 9, 1861, The New-York Historical Society without weakening the blockade, which he considered more Quarterly (October 1961), 45:379. important. Instead, he sent out fast, heavily armed ships to 5. Symonds, The Civil War at Sea, pp. 5457. try to hunt down the raiders, a strategy that mostly proved 6. Stephen R. Wise, Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running in the Civil War (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1988), p. 226. frustrating and ineffectual. Nevertheless, Union warships did 7. William H. Roberts, Now for the Contest: Coastal and Oceanic Naval Operations in capture or destroy two of the most notorious raiders in 1864. the Civil War (Lincoln, NE: 2004), p. 164; Symonds, The Civil War at Sea, p. 58. The third element of the Union naval effort in the Civil War was its pursuit of Confederate commerce raiders such as the Alabama, Florida, and Shenandoah. Initially, Jefferson Davis sought to attack Yankee merchant shipping by issuing letters of marque to Southern privateers. But the experiment was short-lived simply because the combination of the Union blockade and the British declaration of neutrality eliminated most ports where prizes could be sent for adjudication and condemnation. Without the opportunity to make a profit, the whole raison dtre for privateering disappeared. Consequently, commerce raiding was left to Confederate Navy warships that were built or purchased in England and manned by international crews. The most successful of these was the Alabama, commanded by Captain Raphael Semmes.
SHENANDOAH SuRReNdeRS, BY E.D. WALkER, WWW.EDWALkERMARINE.COM

War on the High Seas

34

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Father Neptune
BY CRAIG L. SYMONDS
36
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

LINCOLNS

Noted for his eccentricities and blunt judgments, Gideon Welles proved to be a surprisingly adept chief administrator of the Navy during the Civil War.
ideon Welles was an important political figure in Connecticut, serving as postmaster of Hartford and editor of the Hartford Times and Hartford Evening Press. But President Abraham Lincoln appointed him Secretary of the Navy primarily because of political geography. In those days it was considered essential that each region of the country be represented in the Cabinet, and Lincoln selected Welles as the New England representative over Nathaniel P. Banks of Massachusetts, who was the other contender. As a consolation prize, Banks was appointed a major general, though he subsequently proved to be a very disappointing one. Welles appointment was not universally popular. When the New York political operative Thurlow Weed learned of it, he told the President that if he really wanted an attractive figure-head, to be adorned with an elaborate wig and luxuriant whiskers, he could easily transfer it from the prow of a ship to the entrance of the Navy Department and it would prove quite as serviceable as Welles. Lincoln deflected the mean-spirited taunt by replying, Oh, wooden midshipmen answer very well in novels, but we must have a live secretary of the navy. Similarly, when the 40-year Navy veteran Captain Samuel Francis Du Pont learned of Welles appointment, he wrote to a fellow officer that the best thing he could say about the new Secretary was that when Welles had served as the chief of the Bureau of Provisions and Clothing, he had made a remarkable contract for cheese.1 Over the years, those kinds of flippant assessments have encouraged historians to dismiss Welles as a cartoonish charactera voluble, sputtering, quick-tempered arriviste who was little more than a figurehead at the Navy Department, where the important decisions were supposedly made by the assistant secretary, former naval officer Gustavus V. Fox. Such a conclusion is both misleading and unfair to Welles. In fact, he was earnest, candid, hard-working, loyal, and remarkably successful in managing the greatest naval expansion in the nations history until World War II. In

NATIONAL ARCHIVES

Although his mismatched wig and beard helped make him the subject of snickers, Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles was a savvy power broker who had more experience in naval matters when he came into office than any of his predecessors. During the Mexican War he had served as chief of the Navys Bureau of Provisions and Clothing.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

testimony to that, Welles was one of only two men, Secretary of State William H. Seward being the other, to hold his Cabinet position throughout Lincolns presidency and into the Johnson administration. The origins of the negative appraisals of Welles tenure as Navy Secretary are easy to identify. For one thing, he looked eccentric. As Weed noted, he had luxuriant whiskersa full, bushy white beard that no doubt contributed to Lincolns nickname for him, Father Neptune, and he wore an elaborate shoulder-length wig. Welles had purchased it some years earlier when he first began to lose his hair. At that time his beard was still brown and only slightly tinged with gray, and he bought a wig to match. When his whiskers turned to white, his Yankee thrift apparently prevented him from buying a new wig, so that by the time he became Secretary of the Navy, the difference between the lustrous brown hair and snow white beard was jarring. Moreover, when at his desk, Welles had a tendency to push the wig back on his head as he worked, and on other occasions it rested crookedly on his head, which gave him a comical look. Those who found Welles too blunt or insufficiently cooperative seized on such details to portray him as a clown. In addition, Welles not only spoke his mind freely, he did so without much regard for the popular view of the day or the personal feelings of others. There was little nuance in Welles worldview: On most issues he saw things as either manifestly right or utterly wrong, and he did not spare those who either were wrong (in his view) or attempted to temporize. He found the dithering Major General Henry W. Halleck and the hesitant Major General George B. McClellan contemptible, and he said so. His judgmental attitude earned him many enemies, but it also won him the gratitude of the President, who appreciated Welles candor and counted on his Secretary of the Navy to be honest and straightforward, even if Lincoln did not always accept his views. For both his eccentricity and his candor, Welles was often a target of opposition newspapers. During the Civil War, newspapers made no pretense of being neutral reporters of events, and instead openly championed one political party or the other. In New York City the Democratic paper was the New York Herald. Editor James Gordon Bennett routinely attacked the Lincoln administration on the grounds of perceived inefficiencies, particularly targeting Welles Navy Department. Every time a Rebel ship made it through the blockade or a Confederate commerce raider seized a Union merchantman, Bennett trumpeted it as another failure of Welles Navy Department. During the rampage by the CSS Alabama in 1863, Bennett wrote that her success as a commerce raider was evidence of the neglect, the carelessness, the incompetency, and the utter imbecility of the Navy Department. By humiliating Welles, Bennett

APRIL 2011

37

without congressional approval in the hope that Congress would approve his decision after the fact, which it did; and begin a program to purchase merchant ships and convert them into men-of-war. The latter proved, by far, to be the Union Navys most prolific source of new warships, and in the end, 418 of the Navys 671 combatants were converted merchantmen. The man Welles selected as the Navys purchasing agent for the ships was his brother-in-law George D. Morgan, who had carte blanche to buy whatever vessels he believed suitable, and to pocket generally a 2-percent commission for every ship he bought. Naturally, the arrangeA cartoon in the 31 August 1861 issue of Harpers Weekly depicts Welles as Rip Van Winkle. ment provoked sharp criticism While the Secretary sleeps and a U.S. Navy tub lolls in the background, blockade runners make about nepotism and peculation off with loads of cotton and cigars. in the opposition newspapers, es pecially Bennetts New York Herald. The chairman of the Senate hoped to embarrass the Lincoln administration and proNaval Affairs Committee, John P. Hale, insisted it was simple mote the interests of New York Democrats.2 graft and corruption, and announced congressional hearings. Hales motive was political: He was angered that Welles ll those circumstances contributed to a historical had not granted enough government contracts to Hales view of Gideon Welles that emphasizes his ecfriends and political allies, and he hoped to secure Welles centricity and undervalues his contributions to dismissal. His plan was derailed when he could not turn up victory, even though those contributions were many and any actual examples of fraud or corruption. Morgan bought substantive. Despite unprecedented difficulties, Welles some 89 ships for the government at a cost of $3.5 million, a played a central, even a crucial, role in virtually every bargain at an average of $40,000 per vessel. Morgan thereby aspect of the naval war. He supervised the expansion of earned commissions of some $70,000, a huge sum in 1861. the Navy from 42 warships in 1861 to 671 ships by 1865; Embarrassed by that and by the public outcry, Morgan ofhe authorized and organized the strategic planning for the fered to return all the money, but Welles would not hear deployment of that armada; he was an early and consisof it. Characteristically, his view was that a contract was a tent advocate of innovation, especially the acquisition of contract and Morgan was entitled to every penny.3 armored warships; and he oversaw the promotion (and Welles also established the first naval strategy board in dismissal) of key Navy leaders. In each of these roles he American history. Aware that establishing a blockade meant remained his uncompromising, blunt self and was consemore than simply sending warships one at a time down to quently a target for critics, but in each case he faced down anchor off one or another Southern harbor, the Navy Secthe criticism and emerged justified. retary called together a panel of experts headed by Captain Welles first great task was to enlarge the Navy. Despite Du Pont, with instructions to establish organizing principles the two dozen steam warships that had been built in the for the blockade and the management of the saltwater war. last decade before the war, Lincolns blockade declaration The report of the committee led to the creation of the four on 19 April 1861 meant that the prewar Navy would have blockading squadrons; the seizure of Port Royal, South Caroto be hugely expanded. To accomplish that, Welles imlina, in November 1861; and eventually the establishment mediately did three things: order home all the ships on of a Union foothold all along the Rebel coast.4 distant station patrol; authorize the construction of 23 new Welles actively promoted the Navys first ironclads. steam warships (the original 90-day wonders), doing so Only a few months into the war, it had become evident
NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

38

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

that the Confederates in Norfolk were converting the forHe did not, however, criticize Lincoln, whose only weakmer U.S. steam frigate Merrimack into an iron-armored ness, Welles believed, was that he was too tenderhearted battery. Though veteran officers tended to be skeptical of to protect himself from the many charlatans who tried to the dangers posed by such a warship, Welles decided it was take advantage of his generosity and compassion. Welles essential to develop a counterweapon. He asked Congress cast himself in the role of Lincolns protector against such for an appropriation of $1.5 million for the construction of schemers, a group that, in Welles view, included both Seward and Stanton. Of the former, Welles wrote that the three experimental ironclad warships, and issued a call for Secretary of State was assuming, presuming, meddlesome, proposals. By the end of the summer, a score of designs had and uncertain, that he had no great original conceptions been submitted to the Ironclad Board, composed of three of right, nor systematic ideas of administration, and that officers. The officers themselves, all very senior Navy caphe was a trickster who sought to take advantage of Lintains, tended to favor the proposals that looked most like colns wonderful kindness of heart.5 the ships they already knew and understood. But with Lincolns support, Welles ensured that one of the designs selected was John Ericssons for the vessel that eventually became the Monitor. After the Monitors success against the Virginia in Hampton Roads on 9 March 1862, Welles became an enthusiastic champion of ironclads, and especially ironclads of the Monitor type, characterized by a rotating turret. Indeed, Welles commitment to those ugly ducklings of the naval war very likely led the Union to overlook alternate designs that might have proved equally successful or In a painting of President Abraham Lincoln presenting the preliminary Emancipation even better. That blind spot Proclamation to his Cabinet, Welles sits to the Presidents immediate left, across the table from led him to reject the assessment administration rival Secretary of State William H. Seward. A second Welles opponent, Secretary of Du pont, then commanding of War Edwin M. Stanton, sits to Lincolns right. the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron, that monitors were not a kind of magic bullet that would allow him to steam For all his eccentricities, including his mismatched wig, triumphantly into Charleston Harbor and put the city blunt and judgmental assertions, and unapologetic standard under his guns. for promotion and recognition, Welles proved to be a responsible and reliable administrator whose contributions to Union victory are often underappreciated. hanks to Welles, we know as much as we do about the inner workings of the Lincoln Cabinet. Throughout his years as head of the Navy Depart1. Thurlow Weed, The Life of Thurlow Weed (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1883), vol. 1, p. 611; Du pont to Samuel Mercer, 13 March 1861, in Samuel Francis Du ment, he kept a careful record of each days events. He Pont: A Selection from his Civil War Letters, edited by John D. Hayes (Ithaca, NY: was even more candid in his private diary than he was in Cornell University press, 1969), vol. 1, pp. 4243. The best biography of Welles is John Niven, Gideon Welles: Lincolns Secretary of the Navy (New York: Oxford his public conversation, and since the publication of the University press, 1973). diary 50 years ago, it has provided historians with a rich 2. The New York Herald, 9 October 1863. 3. Craig L. Symonds, Lincoln and his Admirals (New York: Oxford University supply of insider observations about Lincoln, his Cabinet, press, 2008), pp. 5759; Craig L. Symonds, The Civil War at Sea (Santa Barbara, and the generals and admirals who ran the war. Welles did CA: praeger, 2009), p. 35. not suffer fools of any rank, and he wrote scathingly about 4. Kevin Weddle, Lincolns Tragic Admiral: the Life of Samuel Francis Du Pont (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia press, 2005), pp. 10624; Stephen R. his Cabinet rivals (especially Secretary of State Seward Taaffe, Commanding Lincolns Navy: Union Naval Leadership during the Civil War and Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton), Army generals (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute press, 2009), pp. 22529. 5. Gideon Welles, The Diary of Gideon Welles, ed. by Howard K. Beale (New (especially Halleck and McClellan), and, of course, the York: W. W. Norton, 1960), entry of 16 September 1863, vol. 1, pp. 13435. See senior officers of the Navy. also Gideon Welles, Lincoln and Seward (New York: Sheldon, 1874).
U.S. SENATE COLLECTION

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

39

Suggestions for Further Civil War Reading

B C L. S
For the blockade, Robert Browning covers the history of the Union effort in two books: From Cape Charles to Cape Fear: The North Atlantic Blockading Squadron during the Civil War (University of Alabama Press, 1993), and Success Is All That Was Expected: The South Atlantic Blockading Squadron during the Civil War (Brasseys, 2002). Stephen A. Wise covers the Southern side of the story in Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running during the Civil War (University of South Carolina Press, 1988). For the war on t h e We s t e r n r i v ers, the best general study is still John D. Milligan, Gunboats Down the Mississippi (Naval Institute Press, 1949, reprint 1990). But see also the specialized campaign studies by B. Franklin CoolingForts Henry and Donelson: The Key to the Confederate Heartland (University of Tennessee Press, 1987)and Chester HearnThe Capture of New Orleans, 1862 (Louisiana State University Press, 1995). The best one-volume study of the Vicksburg campaign is by Michael Ballard: Vicksburg: The Campaign That Opened the Mississippi (University of North Carolina Press, 2004).

fter decades of neglect, the naval aspects of the Civil War are at last getting a lot of serious attention from historians. In addition to old standards such as Virgil Carrington Jones three-volume The Civil War at Sea (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 196062), published 50 years ago during the centennial of the war, there are a number of newer works that focus on the naval war. These include Ivan Musicants Divided Waters: The Naval History of the Civil War (HarperCollins, 1995), and Spencer Tuckers Blue & Gray Navies: The Civil War Afloat (Naval Institute Press, 2006). A recent shorter history is my own book T h e C i v i l Wa r a t Sea (Praeger, 2009). Lincolns role in the naval war is covered in my 2008 book Lincoln and his Admirals: Abraham Lincoln, The U.S. Navy, and the Civil War (Oxford University Press, 2008), which won the 2009 Lincoln Prize. Stephen R. Taaffe investigates the Union high command and its management of the Navy in Commanding Lincolns Navy: Union Naval Leadership during the Civil War (Naval Institute Press, 2009), and Michael Bennett studies the lower deck in his book Union Jacks: Yankee

Sailors in the Civil War (University of North Carolina Press, 2004). The best general history of the Confederate Navy is by Raimondo Luraghi: A History of the Confederate Navy (Naval Institute Press, 1996). The wars role as a technological watershed has not been overlooked. For Union ironclads see William H. Roberts,

Civil War Ironclads: The U.S. Navy and Industrial Mobilization (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002), and for Confederate ironclads see William N. Still Jr., Iron Afloat: The Story of the Confederate Armorclads (Vanderbilt University Press, 1971; reprinted University of South Carolina Press, 1995). The best book on the role of the submarine H. L. Hunley is Tom Chaffins The H. L. Hunley: The Secret Hope of the Confederacy (Hill & Wang, 2008).

40

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Cavity

By Vladimir mandel

A conscript naval officer looks back on his service in a bygone era a revealing portrait of everyday life in a Soviet destroyer.
y service in the Soviet navy came about neither by choice nor chance, for during the Cold War, conscription was a rite of passage, of sorts, for every able-bodied male in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. At age 19 all were required to register forand eventually undergosome form of military training. It started while one yet was in school; active-duty service came later. There were variations in the service programs, but in general one could expect to serve two to three years in the military. Thus there were no enlistees among the navys seamen; everyone was a conscript. After completing his service as a conscriptwhat Americans would call a drafteea young man could, if deemed qualified, sign a contract to remain in the navy as a (noncommissioned) petty officer or as a midshipman, the equivalent of an ensign in the U.S. Navy. Thereafter he

would move up the promotion ladder based on growth in professional competence. The standard career for such individuals was 25 years. In that era the Soviet navy had two types of officers. One group was the contract careerists, those who chose to make the naval service their lifes work. The other was made up of reservists. The majority in the latter group were young men with some level of higher education. After military training and usually some advanced coursework theyd be demobilizedwith the caveat that as reservists they would be recalled to active duty as their talents were required. I fell into the second category. In my adolescence and young adulthoodthe 1960sthe Cold War came in waves. I was caught up in one of those waves in

42

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

1966, when, after university graduation, I started my navy service as a conscript in the Black Sea Fleet. It was but a 12-month tour, which included some specialized training. Then I was designated a reserve officer and demobilized. A

next day, in time for the flag-raising ceremony. Factoring in travel time and the hope for a decent nights sleep, very little time was left to spend with family or friends. Additionally, at many bases living conditions ashore were very difficult because of a chronic shortage of apartments. Of course, there also were the normal problems of shipboard life. Some crewmen were not of high caliberundisciplined, The Soviet destroyer Komsomolets Ukrainy, in which the author served from 1969 to 1972. She was the first of the Kashin-class destroyers, which were powered by gas-turbine engines and armed with guns, missiles, and torpedoes. The author recalls her as being very seaworthy, but cramped, noisy, and plagued by vibration. recalcitrant, or otherwise unfit for military service. The reallife conditions in a ship were quite a contrast with the romantic dreams that many young men had had about the illustrious, glorious life of a naval officer. Young careerist officers, realizing that there was no way out, and that this would be their life for the next 25 years, became apprehensive about the future, and often depressed. The only way to be dischargedaside from medical reasonswas to do something truly infamous, a course of action that most found morally unacceptable. All such troubles could be multiplied of course, if a ships first lieutenant (executive officer) was draconian in his leadership. In short, the atmosphere and conditions were not goodin some cases leading to alcoholism among officers. For reservists the situation was different. After three years of service, generally, we could return to civilian life and pursue civilian careers. We felt that essentially we were civilians, not military men. Three-years-and-out was not a guarantee, however. It was not unheard of for a reservist to be kept on active duty for 25 years, just like a careerist. Indeed, while I was on active duty rumors surfaced that my year-group of reservists would be ordered to serve for 25 years. So I remember particularly well the moment in 1972, when Admiral Nikolay Nikolayevich Amelkoon board and participating in an informal wardroom conversationremarked, Well, this year we will say goodbye to Lieutenant Mandel, as his service term ends soon. I had learned straight from the admiral himself that the rumors were not true; my reservist

civilian again, I went to work in a research institute, but I was recalled to active duty in August 1969. I was 28. I served as a lieutenant (junior grade), and then lieutenant, until August 1972. Divergent Paths for Officers The life of a career Soviet naval officer often was toughall the more so when he was stationed at a remote base. The normal shortcomings of shipboard life were made worse through so-called organizing or disciplinALL PHOTOS COURTESY OF THE AUTHOR

The author (left), a lieutenant in the Soviet navy, on the deck of his ship, the Komsomolets Ukrainy, as she cruises alongside the USS W. S. Sims (DE-1059) in the Mediterranean Sea in 1972. So-called battle duty for ships of the Black Sea Fleet at the time mostly entailed attempts to detect U.S. Navy submarines and tracking the activity of U.S. carriers in the region. ary periodsspecial drills ordered by senior officers. It was the considered opinion of most that the only purpose such exercises served was exhausting everyone, including the upper echelon. Shore leave was limited, part of a general policy of keeping young officers on board as much as possible. It commenced at 2200 hours and expired at 0800 the
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

43

group would be allowed to leave the service on schedule! Rebuilding the Soviet Navy

Regardless of our status, regular or reservist, the Cold War decades of the 1960s and 1970s kept us busy. Previous reductions in the force levels throughout the Soviet military had been made in an atmosphere of political turmoil not well thought out and frequently in an unreasonable manner. A large number of distinguished and experienced personnel had been thrown out of military life. Many aircraft and ships were decommissioned and destroyed. Military training institutions were closed, their young graduates discharged from active duty. Many military cadets became students in civil institutions. Following Premier Nikita Khrushchevs ballistic missile bluff during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, the Soviet leadership became determined to establish more realistic requirements for the armed forces in preparation for a new phase of the Cold War. The time had come to turn over a new leaf. The need for corrective measures was understood. A national effort to upgrade the armed forces was launched. That was not the first large-scale buildup in the history of the Soviet navy. In the late 1930s many new ships were built and commissioned in a short period preceding World War II. The navy recruited skippers from the merchant fleet. My father, in fact, was drafted from the merchant service for military duty in 1941 and commanded a mine-

Captain Valery Grishanov, the commanding officer of the Komsomolets Ukrainy, instructs his crew before deployment in February 1970. Although he was the son of a high-ranking admiral in the Soviet navy, Grishanov never assumed the airs of the privileged or received any special favors or treatment, the author says.

sweeper during the siege of Sevastopol in 1941-42. The heroes of that era included Alexander Ivanovich Marinesko, the submariner who torpedoed the Wilhelm Gustloff, and Nikolai Alexandrovich Lunin, who attacked the Tirpitz. They are still well remembered, along with the likes of Aleksey Mikhailovich Matayasevich, a captain renowned for his polar exploits, later the commander of the submarine Lembit. But the effort to upgrade the armed services in the 1960s was complicated by a lack of manpower, a demographic legacy of World War II. Additionally, there was an acute shortage of noncommissioned and middlerank commissioned officers, a direct result of Marshal Georgy Zhukovs mid-1950s cancellation of benefits for sergeants and petty officers who had signed on for contract service. The personnel shortages forced a lowering of standards. Thus it was not uncommon for personnel in the lower ranks to have criminal histories or be ill-educated. Incidents of maltreatment and extreme hazing in the ranks rose. The image of the armed forces suffered. More tangible evidence of the problem manifested itself in incidents such as the loss of the destroyer Otvajny. She burned and sank in 1974 in an accident attributed to crew incompetence. Life in a Black Sea Fleet Destroyer The government had begun taking remedial steps prior to the Otvajny disaster, however. One was the organization of schools for petty officersthe chief technicians. The schools produced high-quality personnel in almost all the military specialties. The second significant step of
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

44

the government was the calling up of reserve officers. The maximum age for those call-ups was 28, and so by a matter of months I was still eligible in 1969. I was assigned to the Komsomolets Ukrainy. She was the first ship of the new Kashin-class destroyers, serving with the Black Sea Fleet. The Kashins were equipped with artillery, missiles, torpedoes, sonar, and ASW weapons that were excellent. The gas-turbine engines provided reliable performance and maneuverability. The ship was very seaworthy, ascending waves well and having smooth and moderate pitching, controlled by retractable stabilizers. In a violent storm in the North Atlantic the inclination never exceeded 46 degrees. Living conditions, however, were another story. She was somewhat cramped and vibrated noticeably. A high level of noise from gas turbines was constant. The mess area was able to serve only about two-thirds of the crew simultaneously. That area doubled as a meeting room and theater. Commissioned officers and warrant officers had separate messes. The officers wardroom was ruled by the first lieutenant, while the warrant officers wardroom was led by the chief boatswain of the ship. Medical care, however, was of high quality and under the direction of Lieutenant Eugeny Chikin. He was a very talented surgeon and on numerous occasions conducted serious surgeries while at sea, using the wardroom as an operating room. Chikin later became a chief surgeon of the Black Sea Fleet and in the 1990s he performed a sensational surgery, successfully saving the life of an officer whose head had nearly been severed in an auto accident. A great deal of attention on board was given to physical fitness and sports. No special day or holiday Soviet navy crews traditionally celebrated Army and Navy Day with tug-of-war contests. Right: The KGB officer of the Komsomolets Ukrainy (left) serves as a judge for a competition involving the ships officers. Of the political team on board the ship, the author says, the KGB man was the only one possessing the qualities of a good officer. passed without a traditional naval competition usually a tug-of-war, with the winning team traditionally being awarded a huge pie. There also were fleet sailing contests. The crewmen of the Komsomolets Ukrainys boata six-oared yawlkept it in perfect order. For a considerable period they held the Grand Prize of the Fleet. Not all the Black Sea Fleet ships were brand new like ours. Some were veterans of World War II, with impressive records. Most had been modernized in the 1950s and 1960s. One such ship was the
N AVA L H I S T O R Y N AVA L H I S T O R Y

gun cruiser Slava (formerly the Molotov) commissioned in 1941. She was one of six semi-heavy gun cruisers of the Soviet navy, armed with a battery of nine 7.1-inch (180mm) guns. Those ships should have been designated heavy cruisers because the gun bores exceeded six inches. However, in the Soviet navy they were considered light cruisers. The Slava had her own special story. She was torpedoed in 1942 by German He-111 torpedo-bombers or possibly Italian torpedo boatsit was never determined definitively. In the engagement, she lost her stern, which was hastily replaced with a stern from an incomplete Chapayev-class cruiser, the Frunze. The Frunze, of course, had different hull lines. Attaching the new stern to the damaged ship created some visible steps, both on the deck and in the hull-plating of the Slava. It was quite obvious where the transplanted foreign stern section met the hull of the damaged cruiser, and a matter of some curiosity for those encountering those strange steps for the first time. Manning a Man-of-War The call-up of reserve officers for fleet service filled the vacancies of navigators, communication officers, specialists in electronics, and weapon systemsmostly artillery. Typically a young officer coming on board had a month to learn the ship.

APRIL 2011 APRIL 2011

45

During that time he would thoroughly study all compartments, systems, and equipment. He had to learn the tactical and technical data relating to the operation of the ship. He had to examine all systems, rules, and manuals associated with damage control. He had to become familiar with the ships service schedules as well as the duties of a watch-stander. Only then, after passing all the prescribed testsa tough procedurewas

special benefits or privileges. He endured all the hardships and deprivations of military service as the Soviet military oath required. He knew the needs and interests of all of the sailors and officers in his ship and was very dedicated and helpful as members of the crew prepared for exams. But he ran a tight ship in every respect. He subsequently rose to admiral and served as deputy commander of the Soviet navy. He died too young in 1996. Relations between the officers on the ship were healthy, and in general a spirit of friendship, humor, Fishing in the Mediterranean provided diversion and entertainment for officers and crew alike. The author (left) and his comrades, including the ships captain (center), show off their catch in 1971. Observing quietly at far right is the ever-watchful KGB officer.

he assigned to watch-standing duties. The ships officers generally were keenly interested in successful and timely examinations for a young officer. They supported and helped him; his success meant an addition of another man to the duty roster. Personnel were assigned positions according to their abilities, health, and education. The best menwhether officers or noncommissionedwere routinely sent to the communication, navigation, or radio divisions. Weapons systems relied on the services of career technicianscontract warrant officers and chief petty officers. (Our missile-systems expert was Midshipman Tikhon Bagryantsev, whose son was, at the time, a student at Sevastopol Higher Naval School. The son eventually rose to the rank of captain. Sadly, he was the senior officer in the submarine Kursk when she sank in the Barents Sea in 2000. In the Soviet navy as elsewhere, sons often followed in the steps of their fathers.) Great attention was paid to the tactical training of the officers. It was directly supervised by the commanding officer and included exercises in navigation as well as the study of operations and characteristics of U.S. and NATO ships. In 1969-71 our ship was commanded by Valery Grishanov, the eldest son of a very high-ranking admiral, the head of the Main Political Administration of the Soviet navy. Despite his fathers status, Captain Grishanov never received

and goodwill prevailed. At meetings and debriefings, which usually took place before dinner, those guilty of some dereliction or mishap received their fair share of proper admonishment from the commanding officer or first lieutenant. Then, relieved and cheerfully enthusiastic, all joined the common dinner. In the wardroom there was a piano and we often watched movies. Dominoes, chess, and backgammon also were popular in our spare time, but card games met with disapproval and could be played only in secret. The crew was essentially international, in a way, coming from all the corners of the Soviet Union. I had under my supervision Sailors from Lithuania to Vladivostok and from Severodvinsk to Yerevan. Only men possessing a secondary education could serve in my division (Connection and Observation). Being conscripts, they had spent almost a year in a special training unit before stepping aboard the ship. Their crewmates jokingly called them the sailors aristocracy. Overall the ship embarked 27 officers and approximately 250 crew, making a total of 275-280 souls on board. Battle Duty: Tracking the Enemy In the 1960s the Soviet navy initiated a series of extended, long-range deploymentsgenerally called Battle Duty. The purpose was to show the flag and ensure the state interests of the USSR around the globe. The Fifth
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

46

Operational Squadron was formed in the Mediterranean comprising ships from the Black Sea, Baltic, and Northern Soviet fleets, exchanging places as required to maintain constant battle duty in the Mediterranean. For ships crews, those deployment periods were the best periods of service, despite being quite lengthy. In 1972, for example, our ship once went without a port call for four months, creating some uncomfortable conditions. However, it was always a pleasure to leave the main base in Sevastopol with its senior officers and traditionally stern commandant. We did not miss the tedious duties and formalities associated with shore stations. Service at sea with the watchbreakwatch routine went much faster. Everybody was kept occupied with something real and necessary. U.S. ships fared better than we did. They could use the ports in Greece, Italy, and other NATO countries while we were quite limited in that aspect. Our ships were always on the move or anchored in the open sea, close to land. Consequently, there were limited opportunities for necessary repairs and routine maintenance. The crews became tired. Shortages of fresh water occurred because of the lack of power for desalinization plants. Crews could bathe only when their ships rendezvoused with a large tanker for refueling and receiving fresh water. Weapon systems, on the other hand, always were kept ready and properly maintained. Every ship, while on deployment and cruising alone, also maintained around-theclock contact with headquarters in Moscow. For although showing the Soviet flag ostensibly was our mission, in actuality we were, of course, attempting to detect and track Midshipman Tikhon Bagryantsev, a missile-systems expert, on the quarterdeck of the Komsomolets Ukrainy circa 1970. His son Vladimir was still in school at the time of this photo, but over the years rose to the rank of captain. Tragically, he went down with his submarine, the Kursk, when she sank in the Barents Sea in 2000. Americas nuclear-powered ballistic-missile submarines. They were considered the top strategic menace. The aircraft carrier groups of the U.S. Navy and its NATO allies were likewise regarded as serious threats, and tracking them was a high priority as well. We knew that their aircraft could carry and deliver nuclear weapons. An important part of tracking a carrier, then, was to count all aircraft launched and returned to her flight deck. If there was a discrepancy in the number of those launched vs. those that returned, we had a problem. Once, when we were tracking the USS Forrestal (CVA-59) I believe, we lost two A-4s that had launched, but by our count did not return. That caused much concern. We later learned that the A-4s had landed at a NATO airbase in Italy. Even so, some in our crew received reprimands.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

Foes, but Not Unfriendly Naturally, as mariners any ship held strong interest for us, particularly American vessels. When Soviet and U.S. ships met at sea and cruised side by side, the commanders of the U.S. ships often attempted to establish some form of communication with our commanding officers. Usually, however, the latter would cautiously retreat into the conning tower and remain silent. Meanwhile, the crews in the two ships enjoyed exchanging greetings and photographing each other. In those spontaneous efforts at friendly contact, the U.S. Sailors behaved in a much more free and relaxed manner than ours who would be tense, looking over their shoulders to be sure they were not earning the disapproval of the political officers. That wariness was perhaps warranted. After all, those fellows on the other ship were the enemy. Despite that, I am comfortable in saying that our officers and crew never expressed hate or hostility. Yes, we followed orders in a professional manner, but did so without animosityin part, I think, because of the era. That was a time when many

people remembered their experiences in World War II, when the United States and the Soviet Union were allies against Germany and Japan. The cordial inter-navy relations at the time are best illustrated anecdotally. Two amusing incidents occurred while we were tracking the aircraft carrier USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CVA-42). One came on the first day of Maythe official Labor Day holiday in the Soviet Union. We were at anchor near the Roosevelt in Italy when unexpectedly she weighed anchor and headed out of the harbor. Naturally, we had no choice

APRIL 2011

47

but to follow. As we did, we received a signal from the Roosevelt: Congratulations for the holiday. We apologize for having to interrupt your vacation! On another occasion the big carrier sent us this signal: Today at 2200, your duty will be changed and you will be ordered to proceed home. We have been pleased to cruise together with you. Happy sailing! A change in duty came as news to us, but it was rather cheerfully welcomed. We then contacted our headquarters seeking confirmation. In response we got only silence. But then, precisely at 2200, we received new orders from headquarters: We were to hand off our surveillance of the Roosevelt to another ship and return home! I also recall fondly how we met the flagship of the U.S. Sixth Fleetthe cruiser USS Springfield (CLG-7) carrying the flag of Vice Admiral Gerald Miller. As our ships cruised side by side, we rendered a flag greeting, our crew lining the railing on the upper deck. Our bugler played a signal and our commanding officer and the other officers gave a hand salute. The Springfield responded with a semaphore message from Admiral Miller: Thank you for the greeting! It is always nice to see a sailor who is serving well! Two political developments also were at work at the time and no doubt facilitated that atmosphere of friendly rivalry. For one, it was the era of dtente in Soviet-U.S. relations. President Richard Nixon had visited Moscow and tensions had eased considerably. On the other hand, in roughly the same span of time Moscows relationship with China had become increasingly strained. Starting as early as 1968, in fact, political officers had been ordered to focus their political propaganda on the Chinese. And in turn we had then begun seeing a decline in anti-American propaganda. Pervasive Propaganda and Politics Incredible as it may seem to some Westerners, the time and effort the Soviet navy devoted to ensuring maritime security was nearly matched by its emphasis on political indoctrination of ships crews. Marxist-Leninist priestcraftparticularly the mindless task of note-taking on Lenins worksoften prevailed over professional military training. The former was conducted by political officers from different agencies who sometimes viewed each other jealously and consequently did not work well together. Three such officers were in our ship. They represented three distinct levels of the Navys political structure: the Main Political Administration, the Political Department of the Fleet, and the Political Department of the Division of Ships. Each of the officers carried an important-sounding title, but essentially their shared task was conducting political and ideological indoctrination of the crew. A fourth political officer on boardfrom a special department called Osobiy Otdelwas taken more seriously. He was a senior operative from the navys branch of the KGBthe Soviet Unions state security apparatus.

For some reason those of us in the navyespecially ship crewswere subjected to less ideological indoctrination than most Soviet military personnel. Even so, the political officers were unpopular, for they produced unnecessary paperwork and harassed the crew with boring, time-wasting activities: political discussions, the study of Lenin, and perhaps most annoying, specially prepared propaganda from the mediarudimentary Marxist ideology that generally was poorly written and intellectually insulting to any reasonably educated man. In the eyes of officers and crew those political fellows had little authority, and merited an equal amount of respect. The KGB officer, on the other hand, concerned himself mainly with treason. That elicited some ironic and suspicious attitudes among the crew, but interestingly, in his general qualities as an officer he differed favorably from his political-indoctrination comrades. The main task of the political officers was to reveal and debunk the evil nature of imperialism and its atrocious fangs. Almost all world events were reviewed and presented in that light, especially the contemporary war in Vietnam. However, the yakking parrots were not only recognized exactly for what they were by a generally well-educated and aware crew, the political officers at times clumsily undermined their own efforts. One such instance occurred as our ship transited the Black Sea Strait. No one was allowed on the weather decks. The Deputy Commander for Political Affairs then stationed himself on the quarterdeck, armed with a pistol and a grenadein case some crewman tried to escape to the West by jumping overboard! ********** Looking back I realize more than ever the one key difference between my servicethat of a reserveand that of the career officers. For me and other reservists there were hardships, yes, but there were special events that forged fond memories of military service in a great ship. For the career officers, however, such events became almost part of a routine. They faced a long term of service, with all of its attendant difficulties, problems, decisions, concerns, and repetitive events. They served under arduous conditions for extended periods. As my former first lieutenant frequently comments today, it is difficult to persuade most retired career officers to talk about their years of service, for now they are simply tired. They prefer to forget the past, which is understandable. They served the Soviet Union honorably, and in most cases it just wore them out. Many years have passed since the day my comrades and I left the deck of the Komsomolets Ukrainy. Time has dimmed many of the unpleasant memories of my naval servicethings that created irritation, frustration, and disapproval. But the good memories and fond recollectionscamaraderie, being involved in something important, and making a contribution to societyare brighter and more vivid than ever. Such is the remarkable power of the human mind and spirit.
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

48

0s! e $10 v nd Sa day a r to Orde

Rare Hoard of 100-Year-Old U.S. Gold Coins Released to Public

Just discovered hoard of U.S. $10 Gold Liberty Coins Now Available
Our buyers just discovered one of the most significant European Bank hoards of U.S. gold in years. They secured 1,769 magnificent U.S. gold coins guaranteed to be over 100 years old. The vintage coins in this hoard represent dates ranging from 1866 through 1907 that uniquely represent the history of our nation in fine gold. Uncirculated Gold Coins from the Past are Timeless Treasures

HISTORIC U.S. GOLD ON SALE

$850 ea.
As low as
Dont Miss This Opportunity: Order Now! Consider that the number of U.S. coin collectors has sharply risen to over 50 million today, you may never get a second chance to take advantage of this opportunity. Order now while our limited supplies last. Buy more and save! Due to our limited supply of these coins, we must issue a strict limit of 5 coins per customer. Why pay $997 or more for similar coins? Prices and availability subject to change, so call today. Your satisfaction is assured by our 30-day money-back guarantee.

Each of these $10 Gold Liberty coins is guaranteed to be in Uncirculated Condition. As gold values have soared with unpredictable oil prices and the falling dollar, you may never again have the opportunity to own these gold coins at this price. With the falling Shown larger than actual size dollar, demand for these coins continues to of 27 mm in diameter escalate as collectors and investors scramble to scoop up U.S. gold coins for their Order More & Save pure gold content and scarcity. $ per coin shipping total Guaranteed genuine uncirculated U.S. 1 Liberty Coin $895 $15 S&H $910 gold coins have historical and numismatic 3 Liberty Coins $875 FREE! $2,625 value that bullion gold cannot match, making 5 Liberty Coins (max) $850 FREE! $4,250 these coins even more attractive.

Call Toll-Free:

1-800-695-3120
New York Mint, 5577 W 78th St., Edina, MN 55439
Not affiliated with the U.S. Government 2010 New York Mint

ext. 2426

50

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

offee is a way of life for the American Sailor. No other food or drink comes close to approximating its role in shipboard life. It is the one constant24/7/365. Certainly there are many special memories of sustenance in the Navy and Coast Guard psychebean soup, steel beach barbecues, pizza at seaward Happy Hour (mostly a Coast Guard tradition), Z-burgers, chipped beef on toast (though SOS, as it is known, actually has Army origins), and holiday dinners.1 But by and large those are special occasions. Coffee, on the other hand, is truly a daily ritual. The Continental Congress declared coffee to be Americas national drink in the wake of the 1773 Boston Tea Party, when the Sons of Liberty dumped English tea imports into Boston Harbor. That protestof both excessive taxes and a government-engineered monopoly on the tea trade for the British East India Companyhad actually been spawned in a coffeehouse. Thus has coffee been prominent in the national identity since before there was a nation. Any reading of American military history, on land or sea, from the time of the Revolution forward, indicates that coffee has been at all times a supply necessity, invariably listed with the staples of flour, salt, and beef. Characteristically, Commodore George Deweys flag captain in the Olympia at Manila BayCaptain Charles Gridleyin his official report of the engagement on 1 May 1898, wrote in the fourth sentence, amid other descriptions of final battle preparations and approach to contact, At 4 A.M. of May 1 coffee was served out to officers and men. For he had to be prepared when Dewey uttered his famous phrase: You may fire when ready, Gridley. Coffee was part of that readiness. Not surprisingly, references to coffee are prominent in the literature of the sea. The Victorian novels of R. M. Ballantyne and G. A. Henty own a good many references to it. Roughly a century later, Captain Sam Lombard-Hobson noted in his 1983 World War II memoir, A Sailors War, there was nothing like strong coffee, black as ink and hot as hell, to keep the watch watchful on cold nights in the North Atlantic. Coffee was and is important to operational readinessphysically, psychologically, and even spiritually.

The Tot of Rumand How It Disappeared

Coffee, however, was not always the most popular drink among American Sailors. The favorite had first been hard spirits and beer. The early U.S. Navy, like every other navy worthy of the name, had been modeled on Britains Royal Navy. And of course that meant the daily tot of grogrum diluted with water. The British kept that tradition until 1970, when it was determined that sophisticated electronics were not well-attended by individuals with a Pussers Rum buzz. Rum, then, was an important staple of the U.S. Navy for much of its existence. Captains were afforded great discretion in its distribution, and on occasion Kentucky bourbon was employed. Secretary of the Navy Robert Smith, assuming the office in 1801, substituted American-made sour mash for the West Indies rum, and found that Yankee Sailors favored it. But in 1862, during the Civil War, hard-liquor rations were discontinued. Two years later, General Order No. 29 put restrictions on beer, ale, and wine; they could be brought aboard only with the captains permission. A later regulation allowed officers to form their own wine messes, however, so while it is not known precisely how permissive captains may have been, generally, in allowing drinking privileges to the crew, wine for officers at mealtime remained a customary and daily part of shipboard routine. That all abruptly changed in 1914, during President Woodrow Wilsons administration. His Secretary of the Navy, Josephus Danielsa teetotalerissued General Order No. 99, banning alcoholic beverages from all naval property, effectively abolishing even the sacred officers wine mess. It was hardly a popular change, even with John Q. Public. The New York Tribune depicted Daniels, in cartoons, as Admiral of the USS Grapejuice Pinafore. A verse of an old Navy song, The Armored Cruiser Squadron, was parodied thusly: Josephus Daniels is a goose, If he thinks he can induce Us to drink his damn grape juice In the Armored Cruiser Squadron. As one might expect, such cultural upheaval also spawned numerous legends and tales, the authenticity of which is often difficult to confirm. For example, perhaps because Daniels name was for some time so closely associated with grape juice, a widely repeated anecdote has it that after instituting his ban, the Secretary substituted grape juice in the wine messesan action that lives on today in the form of the Navys omnipresent bug juice. Most of the sentiments applied to General Order No. 99 are lost to memory, however, and that is probably a good thinggiven Sailors capacity to get at the ribald heart of things. Yet another such link to Daniels persists in Navy lore. The popular American slang for coffeea cup of Joeis held to be an apt and direct association to the abstemious gentleman

ALL PHOTOS: U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PHOTO ARCHIVE

Sailors on the signal bridge of the cruiser USS Minneapolis (CA-36) take a break for a morning rituala hot cup of coffeein August 1937. The staple of shipboard life is important, the author contends, to operational readinessphysically, psychologically, and even spiritually.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

51

Coffeepots and coffee cups are ubiquitous in Navy life and can be found just about anywhere in any and every ship. Left: Radioman 3rd Class J. E. Eicher kept his cup handy while at work in 1948 in the USS Valley Forge (CV-45). Below: Sea Service chiefs, according to the author, always have the best coffee. In this October 1956 photo, Navy chiefs in the USS Radford (DDE446) relax in their quarters with some reading, cigarettes, andwhat else?coffee.

who unwittingly had a hand in ushering in a new and even greater drinking obsession. Regardless of that storys veracity, there can be no denying that while coffee had long been an integral aspect of life in commissioned ships, the banishment of alcohol made it an essential ritual. Coffee replaced the daily rum tot (or the mealtime wine) with numerous caffeine totsall the day long.

Coffee, Coffee, Everywhere

Coffee has long been a democratic drink. Indeed, Englands King Charles II called coffeehouses seminaries of sedition.2 The U.S. Navyand the American military in generalseems always to have owned fewer inherent class distinctions than foreign counterparts. In World War II it was not uncommon for Allied sailors to comment on the easier relationship between officers and enlisted men of the American armed forces than in their own services. Coffee had a hand in that. Prior to the Civil Warera elimination of liquor rations and Secretary Daniels 1914 ban on all alcohol, the tools of relaxation were beer, rum, or bourbon for the lower deck and wine for the officers. After 1914, it wasdemocraticallycoffee for all hands. An arbitrary distinction had been cast aside. American Sailors, ever quick to espy and exploit an opportunity to make a hard life of hard lying a bit easier, made coffee messes afloat as prominent and omnipresent as a Sailors knives, word passed over the 1MC, and errant OODs being chewed out on the bridge wing by the Old Man. By the time of World War II, there were coffeepots on

the bridge, in the engine room, in CIC, in the boiler room, in the ships office, in the supply office, in the armory, and in the machine shop. Probably in other places, too. In the vast buildup following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the U.S. Navy quickly established its own coffee-roasting plants in Oakland, California, and Brooklyn, New York. Another was later established in Hawaii. The wartime Navy took coffee quite seriously. Shortly after Pearl Harbor, most of Hawaiis kona crop was purchased by the U.S. Navy, in one of those cases where a young officer was told to just get the job done and damn the lesser consequences. Retired Coast Guard Chief Warrant Officer Fred Siegel, whose Freds Place Web site unites Coast Guardsmen with one another and links up with the wider armed forces community via www.military.com, has remarked on the fact that so many sea stories seem to include coffee. One scribe on the site wrote, typically: For any sailor, coffee is a holy substance blessed by King Neptune himself and gifted with the power
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

52

to jumpstart any watch-stander to a level of alertness that ensures success. While engines run on diesel, Im convinced that some boatswains mates run only on coffee.

In the End, What's Not to Like?

But it is not just the ubiquity of coffee around ships, and its stimulus to watchfulness, that create its lore and welcome place among Sailors. Consider the following: For a young officer to be invited into the chiefs mess for coffee is a genuine mark of approval. Asked into the cabinand then offered coffeemeans that nothing bad is about to happen to you. Ones own coffee mug in the wardroom is a sign of belonging. The quality of the coffee is always an opportunity for safe conversation. Amid a long and difficult evolution at sea, the serving of coffee is a testament to the seriousness of the endeavor, and the need for continued strength. When that evolution has been completed, coffee is the celebratory drink. When a guest comes aboard and just cannot abide the strength of shipboard coffee, it really is funny, providing a healthy feeling of superiority. As Nicholas Monsarrat put it, Sailors ought to be running the world. 3 Your hand around a hot mug on a cold and wet day is one of lifes quiet joys. When you are not sure which mission to tackle next, getting a cuppa gives you time to think. Even the XO wont begrudge you that. Usually. The chiefs will always have the best coffee (as well as the best of everything else). That is why they are chiefs. And, of course, they dont have the disparity of age and experience that a wardroom has. No matter how rotten the seaward day (or night) may have been, coffee is a solace. George MacDonald Fraser wrote, quite accurately, Thats the hellish thing about shipboard lifethere is nowhere to hide your carcass or your nature.4 But there is always a cup o Joe.
1. Z-burger is a service-academy term for lunchtime hamburgersa meal said to have a guaranteed sleeping-pill effect for afternoon classes. Its origin is the Coast Guard Academy, but it has made its way elsewhereincluding some restaurants in the South and Pacific Northwest. 2. In 1675 Charles II attempted to shut down Englands coffeehouses, fearing they could spawn revolutionary activities. But the public outcry forced him to rescind the order two days before it was to take effect. 3. Nicholas Monsarrat, The Cruel Sea (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1956). Monsarrat served as executive officer to Captain Sam Lombard-Hobson, aforementioned author of A Sailors War. 4. George MacDonald Fraser, Flashman on the March (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005).

Secretary of the Navy Josephus Daniels in 1914 banned alcohol from Navy shipsmedicinal use exceptedinviting the scorn of naval officers, enlisted men, and even the general public.

N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

53

Appalling Calamity
An

By Noah aNdre Trudeau

O
54

Trouble brewing between Western powers in the Pacific was sidelined by a fateful interruptionthe Great Samoan Typhoon of 1889.
toward a volcanic archipelago known as the Samoan Islandsand contact with a second simmering storm that was entirely of human making. Two major powers were in a tense standoff regarding which one would shape the future course of the Samoan Islands. The crisis had its origins in the transformation of the worlds navies from sail to steam. Steam engines required lots of coal, and the Pacifics vastness meant that no warship could carry enough to cover its distances, so hitherto inconsequential islands along the principal travel lanes suddenly became much prized as refueling stations.
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

n or about 13 March 1889, at a location in the Pacific roughly 10 south latitude and 165 west longitude, the beast was born. No one had charted its growth from a swirl of winds to a tropical depression and then into a tropical storm. At each stage it grew in size and acquired more components of misery: towering cumulus and nimbus clouds, increasingly steady strong winds, lengthening bursts of torrential rains, and a tightening clockwise spiral. As it expanded from a tropical storm into a full-fledged typhoon, it was moving on a southwesterly course, headed directly

Imperial Germany and the United States now vied for influence over the islands, while Great Britain was a most interested third-party observer. Pacific Power Politics The two powers meddled with the Samoan ruling system, headed by a king selected by a majority of the island chains five provincial leaders. By 1889 the Germans enjoyed direct control through their candidate, Tamasese, while the United States supported an exiled rival, Laupepa, and worked behind the scenes to influence events. The Germans backed their claimant with force. Beginning in mid-August 1887, they stationed warships in the small harbor serving the island chains administrative center, Apia. Tensions between the two Samoan sides erupted into something akin to a civil war, with the resistance coalescing around a leader named Mataafa. By March 1889, Germany and the United States each had three warships anchored in Apia Harbor. Relations were icily formal, although several incidents came perilously close to igniting a wider conflict. The German ships present in Apia Harbor were all sail/steam hybrids: the iron/wood composite gunboat Adler, the iron-hulled gunboat Eber, and, most powerful of the three, the 12-gunner Olga, a 2,424-ton corvette. The biggest American warship on station was also the most recent arrival, the 3,900-ton woodenhulled cruiser Trenton, mounting 15 guns and serving as the flagship for Rear Admiral Lewis Ashfield Kimberly, commanding the U.S. naval force on pacific Station. Next down in size was the 2,033-ton screw sloop Vandalia. The 1,375-ton sloop Nipsic rounded out the U.S. presence. The final major player on the scene was the British observation vessel HMS Calliope, a 2,770-ton iron- and steelsheathed cruiser armed with 16 guns. Also in Apia Harbor were at least nine merchant vessels, making things extremely tight in the small anchorage. In the opinion of the Calliopes Captain Henry Coey Kane, no more than four major ships should have been anchored in it at any one time. The

ALL IMAGES: NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

restricted space underscored a litany of dangers for craft caught there in a storm. Apia was located on the northern side of the island of Upolu, inside a fully exposed V-shaped bay that faced almost directly north. A barrier reef stretched across the harbors mouth with just a single opening three cables (720 yards) wide permitting entrance. Much of the harbor had been fashioned by freshwater outflow from the Mulivai and Vaisingano rivers, which descended from the south. The harbor floor was all coral, but over the years the rivers had deposited enough silt to allow for marine growth and sufficient traction for ship anchors. The river flow interacted with the ocean movement to create strong and unpredictable currents throughout the harbor, which was ringed by shelves and nearly continuous reefs. Only a short stretch of sandy beach at the mouth of the Vaisingano interrupted the sharp-edged perimeter. For a ship captain, the best defense in case of bad weather was to be somewhere else. When March Winds Blow The opening months of 1889 had not been without their usual share of storms, the heaviest coming on 1314 February. That tempest had caused the Eber to sideswipe a reef, bending her propeller shaft, causing the loss of several knots in speed. Februarys intensity seemed to satisfy everyone that the storm season was winding down. As Admiral Kimberly recollected, The local pilots and other old residents on shore, supposed the backbone of the seasons bad weather had been broken.1 A coppery red sunset was seen on 12 March. It began to rain on 13 March, the precipitation continuing into the next day with frequent squalls and a generally falling barometer. The weather had worsened on the morning of 15 March to the point that the warships began to batten down. Upper hampers were struck, leaving only topgallants. Lower yards were eased down to the deck. Any loose equipment was firmly lashed or moved under cover. Anchors where checked. Engines were warmed up. For each commander, a moment of truth arrived that day when the decision had to be made whether to meet the weather in the harbor or retreat into open water. Kimberly later enumerated his reasons for staying. The most anyone was expecting was heavy rains, and a run out to sea would have consumed much hard-to-replace coal. The admiral was confident that with kedge anchors deployed and the steam engines operating to relieve strain on the chains, they could weather the storm.

March 1889: German and U.S. warships warily watched each other in the cramped confines of Apia Harbor, Samoauntil a typhoon swooped down and curtailed the course of human events. With her rudder smashed and her canvas in tatters, the cruiser Trenton, the largest U.S. Navy vessel present, dragged along the reefs in a desperate struggle to survive.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

55

National pride also played a part. No bed down to the hard coral, leaving little for the anchors to grip. Soon the vessels captain wanted to be the first to scurry began dragging about the anchorage, his flag out of the harbor, and even late dangerous to themselves and others. in the morning of 15 March, with the It is a testament to the skill and deweather continuing to deteriorate, no termination of their crews that the warship budged from the anchorage. warships survived until the morning The one saving grace was that so far of 16 March before they began to the wind had come from the south. succumb. The first was the Eber, alAll that began to change after ready crippled by previous damage to 1400. It was about then, a scientist her propeller shaft. Starting around later reckoned, that the eye of the 0800, catastrophe piled on catastrotempest was located just north of phe. A series of mountainous waves Apia Harbor. The barometer dipped pushed the ship onto the inner basin to an ominous and record-setting reefs bordering the harbors western side, 29.07. There was a sullen calm under a and the weakened propeller finally gave leaden sky that made everyone hold their way. For just a few seconds, the craft ground breath. By now the local weather prophets along the coral edge before crashhad changed their tune. The old diving, taking with her the captain timers, wrote the American consul Rear Admiral Louis Ashfield Kimberly, commanding U.S. Pacific naval forces, was and 72 of his crew. The four survifrom his office in the town, expect vors who struggled weakly toward a hurricane during the night.2 The an eyewitness to the cataclysmic weather the shore found themselves plucked storm again began to increase in in- event that wreaked havoc on the ships of two from certain death by strong Samoan tensity. Rain fell in blinding sheets, powerful navies. arms. These were some of Mataafas and the wind made a dramatic shift. men, who had come down from the It was roaring in from the north; hills to exploit the chaos caused by the storm but instead any vessel still hoping to clear the cramped harbor would followed their humanitarian impulses. have to battle powerful headwinds and waves. By sunset the Next to go was the Nipsic, which had had more than her combination of frothy spray, rain, and darkness had reduced share of ill luck. Caught in the powerful harbor currents near visibility to virtually nil. The seven warships, crammed so the mouth of the Vaisingano, the ship had been propelled tightly into the limited space, began yawing wildly at the about the anchorage, overrunning and sinking a merchant end of their iron tethers. schooner around dawn. Shortly after that, she was speared For a brief period around midnight the barometer began on her port side by the Olga, also fighting for her life. Besides rising and everyone thought the crisis was ending. It was having a section of her side crushed in, the Nipsic lost her a cruel trick of nature. What was happening was a rare smokestack, allowing a torrent of seawater to engulf her critibut not unknown phenomenon called recurvature. The cally important boilers. Adding insult to injury, the toppled typhoon was being pushed back by powerful upper-level 3,000-pound stack began rolling across the deck, piling on winds that forced the weather system to retrace its steps. the terror that gripped the Nipsics crew. A few brave men From the evidence in hand it would also seem that the continued to fight for the ship. When the drenched coal tempest further intensified during this period. The storms refused to burn, Captain Dennis W. Mullan remembered he greatest energy was now being funneled directly into the had barrels of salt pork in the hold and ordered their conunprotected bay. tents fed into the boiler furnacesa desperate improvisation Hell in a Harbor that bought a few more hours of life to the vessel. Perhaps a half hour after the Eber met her fate, another The wind was unrelenting; according to Admiral Kimseries of heavy waves and the loss of a critical anchor left berly, for nearly 24 hours, the gale was a hurricane.3 Great Mullan with no choice but to try to beach the Nipsic. waves surged into the anchorage where they encountered Somehow in the cauldron of wave, rain, wind, and lurchricocheting currents from all quarters of the tight harbor, ing ships, the determined captain conned his ship onto a made even worse by the blasting discharge from the two patch of sand near the mouth of the Vaisingano. Several rivers, suddenly hugely swollen by the rain deluging the panicked men drowned as they jumped or were swept into islands interior. The powerful river flow began scouring the tumultuous waters; a few more perished in efforts to get the bottom of the bay. The warship crews fighting for their a lifeline onto the shore where some of Mataafas men were lives counted on their anchors to see them through the waiting to help. Finally, with the assistance of a Samoan storm, but now the overloaded rivers had ground the sea

56

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Command passed to Lieutenant James Carlin, who soon human chain that heroically pushed out into the turbulent had a major problem. The Vandalia and Calliope had shifted bay, the line was established and survivors began coming about so that the English cruiser was poised to puncture the on shore. Once safe, many of the Nipsics exhausted and Americans port side. Again and again the iron ship seemed demoralized crew put distance between themselves and the sure to strike, yet just as often the surging seas pulled her hellish harbor. Not only did they show no interest in helpaway. The luck of the Vandalia ran out shortly after 0730 ing their mates still struggling on board the Trenton and on 16 March as another wave brought the two ships hard Vandalia, but a few uncovered liquor stocks in town and together. For the next 90 minutes the Vandalias sturdy conpromptly got roaring drunk. struction and desperate damage control kept her afloat. It The Olga already had been an unwilling collaborator was during this period that Schoonmaker reappeared, pale in the demise of the Nipsic, and she performed a similar but determined. The ship was now veering broadside to the service for the Adler. After surviving several close calls waves, the roiling maelstrom making it nearly impossible and a long night of barely avoiding the reef, the Adler was for men to work on deck. Not long after 1030 the decision just pulling free from a scrape with the coral by virtue of was reached to beach the Vandalia. training, discipline, courage, and hastily repaired steering tackle, only to see the Olga loom up out of the dark. She struck, splintering the Adlers bowsprit before sloughing off for a short distance. Contrary winds and currents made the Adlers beaching attempt impossible. With her last anchor cut loose, a powerful swell lifted the Adler onto the western reef, cracking her keel and rolling her on her side, but leaving the bow facing the shore. About 20 men were lost in the foaming brine while the remainder lashed themselves to whatever The German warship Adler survived a night of hell only to be crashed into by another German vessel in the seemed secure. They morning. A swell subsequently hurled the Adler onto a reef, cracking her keel and leaving her on her side. were drenched, cold, and miserable, and some For a moment it seemed as if the desperate gamble would would bear the psychological scars of their experience for pay off, but once the Vandalia came abreast of the Vaisinthe rest of their lives, but they were alive. gano River, the powerfully swirling currents twisted the Crashing Waves and Desperate Gambles ship so that she was again broadside to the fierce elements. The ordeal of the Vandalia was the worst suffered by She crashed against the lower western reef. At the comthe American warships on station. Shortly after midnight mand to abandon ship, weary crewmen fought their way the underpowered ship began shifting position, dragging onto the deck only to face peril in any attempt to essay the perilously close to HMS Calliope. Being near the harbor 40 or 50 yards to shore. Fifteen-foot waves began breakentrance exposed the Vandalia to powerful waves, and ing up the Vandalia, whose debris, Lieutenant Carlin later an especially destructive one smashed into the ship just wrote, was going over us as if shot out of a cannon. A after daylight, violently slamming Captain Cornelius M. bump from this was death.4 A great wave flooded the ships Schoonmaker around in his cabin. When the badly inentire length, and Schoonmaker was gone. The crews last jured officer came out on deck, another sudden lurch of chance for survival was to clamber into the rigging and be the vessel caused him to strike his head, requiring that he lashed by the howling winds, a desperate act that promised be carried below. only to prolong their suffering.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

57

Blessed with the newest and most powerful engines in the anchorage, HMS Calliope still fought a failing battle trying to hold position. After unintentionally spearing the Vandalia, the Calliope was nearly rammed by a careening Olga. Between the reef and the other two struggling vessels, Captain Kanes ship was pinned in a deadly box. It was, he said afterward, the most ticklish position I was ever in.5 As he saw it, the only chance was to use the powerful engines to haul out of the harbor. Orders were given to rev them up to maximum and then, with the ships stern just 20 feet from the deadly reef, the anchor cables were cut. Even with the boiler gauges red-lined, the Calliope made barely one knot of headway. The last obstacle to her freedom was the massive Trenton, as helpless as any of the smaller ships. Expertly timing his move with the heaving seas and the abrupt lurches of the unpredictable Trenton, Kane conned the Calliope under the Americans looming stern and around it. Fighting to maintain passageway, the officers and men of the Calliope heard an unexpected sound mingled with the keening winds. It was cheering. Even as they were fighting for their lives, the Trentons Sailors paused long enough to salute the courage of their English compatriots. Captain Kane could barely register the honor before the fight went on. In the storms darkness and spray, he could barely see ahead. After finding the narrow entrance by compass and nerve, he drove the ship out of the harbor, though he wouldnt realize it until the next day. The Calliopes engines ran at full power for more than ten hours and never faltered. Struggle and Salvation Just two warships remained afloat in Apia Harbor as the Calliope clawed her way out, but one would soon be on the beach. After punching into the port side of the Nipsic, coming close to doing the same thing to the Calliope, then becoming fatally entangled with the Trenton later in the afternoon, the Olga finally ended up grounded on the soft mud of the eastern bay, her stern to the wind. The fight of the Trenton was made far more difficult by a serious design flaw. Most vessels bow ports for the anchor chain and docking hawsers led to the open gun deck, but the Trentons hawseholes vented internally, into the forward berth area. In heavy seas the lower section could count on a wetting; now, with her bow pointed into the teeth of a typhoon, the influx was overwhelming the pumps. Frantic efforts were made to stopper the flood, but they were never enough. The added weight drove the bow down and by 1000 the water around the boilers was waist-deep. Countless acts of heroism took place as the Yankee Bluejackets fought to keep the critical sails in place to maintain the Trentons position to the wind, an especially difficult task once the ships rudder had been smashed. The men only paused in their efforts long enough to cheer the Calliope as the valiant ship fought her way to freedom. Despite every-

ones efforts, wind and sea power began to tell, and the great Trenton, originally anchored near the harbors mouth, was steadily driven deeper into the bay. With all canvas in tatters, crewmen were ordered into the mizzen rigging to form a human sail in a last-ditch effort to keep the ships head into the wind. Precious time was bought by a quirk in topography; the western interior reef fell away to the southwest, so as the Trenton was pushed along its coral perimeter, her hull found enough open space to continue the struggle to survive. Then came the entanglement with the Olga. In clearing that, the Trenton got caught in the Vaisingano current, which drove her hard toward the coral shelf, putting her on a collision course with the already stricken Vandalia, her surviving crew clinging desperately to the rigging. A widely syndicated newspaper account at the time reported that the Trentons band played The Star-Spangled Banner to buck up less fortunate comradesa notion later scoffed at by Trenton survivors. Why, man, it was as much as a man could do to keep from being thrown about by the sea and the motion of the vessel, said a boatswains mate. He did well if he held on to himself, without thinking of such a thing as holding on to a musical instrument and playing it into the bargain.6 Now the storm swung the Trentons stern tightly into the Vandalias side. A series of lines were quickly heaved from the flagship. Even better, the storm pushed the Trenton nearly parallel to the Vandalia and just 40 feet apart. For a few precious and desperate minutes, many of the Vandalias crew climbed, swung, or hauled themselves aboard the Trenton. As unexpectedly as it was offered, this last chance was gone. Soon after [the survivors crossed over] we struck the Vandalia with violence, Admiral Kimberly later reported, and her main and mizzen masts went by the board.7 In a dramatic turnabout, the hulk of the Vandalia became an unmoving anchor point for the Trenton. The flagships larger size now provided limited protection to her crew and those lucky ones from the Vandalia who made the dangerous transfer. As long as the Trentons hull held together it offered refuge to the weary Sailors. Then, finally, early on the morning of 17 March, the storm began to abate. The winds died away completely by 0500, though the harbor waters still churned. With the help of Samoan muscle, lines were made fast to the shore and the slow process of transferring Sailors to the land began. The effort soon spread to all ships in the harbor, American or German, though Teutonic suspicions of Samoan intentions limited the aid they received. Foreign Domination Forestalled The next days were a blur of activity as the injured were tended and efforts made to restore the wrecked vessels. National pride dictated that each country would repair one of its own. For the Americans it would be the Nipsic, for the Germans, the Olga. On 19 March, the Calliope returned
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

58

to Apia Harbor, her brave crewmen astonished at the destruction they had avoided. Besides the demolished warships, none of the merchant vessels had survived, though most of their crews had been sent ashore before the storm broke. The next day, with the Calliopes help, one of Kimberlys officers connected with an Auckland-bound steamer and a working telegraph to the United States. By 30 March the story of the disaster was filling columns in U.S. newspapers. Back in Apia Harbor, German and American work on ship repairs paused only for the sad duties of burial as bodies were found and identified, including that of the unfortunate Captain After the storm, newspaper reporters and Navy men gathered on the island to pay Schoonmaker. On 2 April the Olga, in their respects at the grave of Captain Cornelius M. Schoonmaker, commander of the company with a passing German passen- Vandalia, who died in the Great Samoan Typhoon along with 148 others. ger steamer, set off for Sydney. Fifteen days later the Nipsic weighed anchor and ment to various service duties, the ship lost her name for reached Auckland, though not without scary moments when 16 years and then regained it for 22 more before being some of the patchwork failed to hold up in the open sea. In scrapped in 1953. Afterward, her helm was presented as the final tally, 86 German sailors perished in the storm and a gift to the government of Western Samoa, which subse60 Americans, for a total of 146 military lives lost. Added quently passed it along to a New Zealand museum. to that were one Samoan Samaritan and two merchant seaThe events in Apia Harbor were still fresh on the mind men. In the harbor itself, most of the hulks were completely of president Benjamin Harrison in his State of the Union dismantled, while pieces of the Adler lingered for many years, Message in early December 1889. Terming the incident an a poignant reminder at low tide of the life-and-death drama appalling calamity, the president went on to praise the U.S. that had played out in its usually placid waters. A stone meSailors for what they had accomplished. It is most gratifymorial outside Apia remembers the German casualties, while ing, he wrote, to state that the credit of the American Navy a Mare Island Navy Yard tablet notes the Americans lost. for seamanship, courage, and generosity was magnificently At first it seemed that affairs in the Samoan Islands were sustained in the storm-beaten harbor of Apia.8 to pick up where they had left off before the typhoon intervened. However, its awesome violence took much of the starch out of the foreign warriors. Kimberly managed to 1. Louis Ashfield Kimberly, Samoan Hurricane (Washington, DC: Naval Historical arrange for a truce while higher powers gathered in distant Foundation, 1965), quoted from online version at www.history.navy.mil/library/ online/samoan.htm. Berlin. It was decided that the islands would remain free 2. Edwin p. Hoyt, The Typhoon that Stopped a War (New York: David McKay of foreign domination. Laupepa was placed on the throne, Company, 1968), p. 58. 3. Everett Hayden, The Samoan Hurricane of March, 1889, U.S. Naval InstiMataafa professed himself a loyal subject, and Tamasese tute Proceedings, vol. 17, no. 2 (1891), p. 286. was allowed to retire from public view. Ten years later, the 4. James William Carlin, Letter of 26 March 1889, Naval Historical Foundation papers (Library of Congress Manuscript Collection). three powers reconsidered their positions and reinserted 5. Graham Wilson, Glory for the Squadron: HMS Calliope in the Great Hurthemselves into Samoan affairs. By the Tripartite Convenricane at Samoa 1889, Journal of the Australian Naval Institute, May/July 1996, p. 52. tion of 1899 Germany assumed control of the islands lying 6. The New York Times, 3 July 1889. west of 171 latitude, and the Americans claimed oversight 7. Report of Rear Admiral L.A. Kimberly in Annual Report of the Secretary of those east of that line. of the Navy (1889); quoted from online version at www.history.navy.mil/faqs/ faq102-3.htm. The three surviving ships met varied fates. The Olga 8. Benjamin Harrison (3 December 1889), http://www.infoplease.com/t/hist/statelasted until 1908 when she was scrapped, while the Nipsic of-the-union/101.html. was decommissioned in 1890 and spent several years as a Other sources: stationary barracks/prison before passing into private hands John Alexander Clinton Gray, Amerika Samoa (Annapolis, MD: U.S. Naval Institute, 1960). as a barge. A bit more glory awaited the heroic HMS CalBob Drury and Tom Clavin, Halseys Typhoon (New York: Grove press, 2007). liope, which took part in Queen Victorias Diamond Jubilee Harrie Webster, A personal Narrative of the Wreck of the Vandalia at Samoa, March 16, 1889, The United Service (October 1894). Review of the Fleet at Spithead in 1897. After reassignN AVA L H I S T O R Y

ApRIL 2011

59

Sailor Who Torpedoed

a Train
By Carl LaVO

The

An enlisted man with a thirst for action and a will to win, Swish Saunders helped revolutionize how submarines could be used in war.

ow, theres a target I would like to blow up. In the closing months of World War II, Commander Eugene Fluckey saw a familiar scene through the periscope: trains running up and down the remote eastern coast of Japans Karafuto Prefecture. As skipper of the USS Barb (SS-220) on patrol in the Okhotsk Sea, Fluckey watched the feathery stream of locomotive smoke against the mountains, trains no doubt loaded with troops and supplies to thwart an American invasion. But how could the Barb stop them? Fluckeys comment about wanting to blow up the target perked the ears of Chief of the Boat Paul Golden Swish Saunders. He had some ideas. At a plotting table the captain unrolled a topographic map of the province showing the rail lines. Perhaps Barb Sailors in rubber boats could go ashore, plant explosives under the tracks, then detonate one of the subs scuttling charges under a moving train. Imagine, offered Saunders, the crew of a submarine sinking a train. The skipper smiled: Well, lets get on with it. The obvious choice for the mission was the COB himself, a wiry 26-year-old Virginian who had earned his moniker quivering like a pointer dog as he swished back and forth directing the firepower of the Barb in surface gun action and rocket launches that were to revolutionize submarine warfare. Swish also had the rare distinction of

NATIONAL ArCHIVES

Paul Golden Swish Saunders brought a winning combination of guts and ingenuity to a fight; a shipmate compared him to a character out of a paperback novel. Swish was destined to become one of the Navys most decorated enlisted men.

being on board the same submarine through 12 arduous war patrolsfive in pursuit of German shipping in the Atlantic off Europe and seven against Japan in the Pacific. Most crewmen rotated to other subs after four or five patrols. Not Swish. Described by a fellow submariner as a real salty Sailor, almost a character out of a paperback novel, he possessed unflappable will to engage the enemy. Would the plan to destroy a train work? Saunders was confident in his abilities from a long career in surface ships and submarines. But he was mindful of what could go
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

60

wrongas it had during the Barbs first war patrol, almost three years earlier. Operation Torch In support of the November 1942 Allied invasion of North Africa, Operation Torch, the Barb was deployed in October to deliver scouts in rubber boats off the coast of Algiers. The commandos and the subs in Torch were outfitted with infrared beacons to mark the way to beachheads at Fedhala, Mehedia, Safi, and Algiers. As a gunners mate in the Barb, Saunders was eager to be part of the action. Growing up in the backwater of Singing Glen in western Virginia in the 1930s, he yearned to be in the military as war overtook Europe. At 17, he tried to enlist in the French Foreign Legion but was too young. So he enlisted in the Navy and served in the USS Raleigh (CL-7), Sampson (DD-394), and McCook (DD252), gaining experience at sea from Iceland to South America to the south of France. Lured by the additional danger and mystery of submarine duty, Saunders qualified in the coastal-defense sub R-4 (SS-81) and was on board the new fleet boat Barb at her commissioning in 1942. World War II was in full bore, and Operation Torch promised to put the Gato-class submarine and her gunners mate right in the middle of it. Unfortunately, things didnt go as intended. Navigational problems and language differences beset the invasion force and led to confusion. The Barb launched her five scouts to proceed to a bell buoy off the Safi dock. Because of inaccurate charts, the scouts had to paddle much farther than anticipated and got caught in a crossfire between arriving Allied destroyers and shore batteries. The ships quickly secured the anchorage, however, and rescued the scouts unharmed. For the next several months the Barb operated out of Scotland, conducting war patrols against blockade runners in the Bay of Biscay, where she sank a presumed German tanker. During the boats fifth patrol in the North Atlantic, Saunders came to the attention of the executive officer, Lieutenant Commander Everett H. Steinmetz, after he told the then-chief of the boat to break in a new manifold operator (the enlisted man who controlled the dive). A day later, as the sub raced ahead on four main engines, lookouts spotted an enemy periscope and sounded the diving alarm. Normally, high-speed dives left less room for error and required practice. Steinmetz and the COB, realizing the new man was on the manifold, blanched. The Chief of the Boat and I hit the control room from opposite directions, Steinmetz recalled. The trainee had executed his portion of the dive flawlessly. I qualified him then and there! I mention this because every man that made a patrol in Barb had the trainee as a shipmate. He was Swish Saunders.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

Dynamic Duo After five unremarkable war patrols off Europe, the Barb moved to the pacific, where her first two patrols brought few successes. That abruptly changed when Eugene Fluckey, 33, the boats prospective commanding officer, became skipper and picked Saunders to be his chief of the boat. At first the gunnery chief demurred: Not me, Captain, no way. All the men are my friends. As chief of the boat Id have to tell them off and discipline them. How could I do that? Swish, I dont want a bastard, I want a leader, the skipper later recalled saying. We dont drive men on board the Barb. We lead them. From my experience with bastards,

NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

The intrepid Saunders was well-paired with his skipper in the Barb, Commander Eugene Fluckey, a kindred spirit when it came to taking the battle to the enemy. Above: Fluckey stands alongside the Barbs fairwater after receiving the Navy Cross in December 1944. By wars end he would garner the Medal of Honor, four Navy Crosses, and an unmatched sunken-tonnage total for World War II sub captains.

ApRIL 2011

61

they achieve about equal results. But theres one big difference. When you lead men, they ship over and want to stay with you. Saunders worried about making a mistake as COB. So you goof, said Fluckey. Dont hide it or cover up. Do your best to correct your mistakes and dont be afraid to ask for help from anyone from top to bottom. Youll find people are complimented when you ask for help. In submarines we hang our rates on the gangway when we come aboard. Its what you can do that counts with me. The deal was struck. Swish never viewed himself as anything but an enlisted man, even though he was COB, according to Neal Sever, the boats signalman. I never saw him pull rank on any of us, nor did I ever hear any of us bitch about Swish. He was pleasant and treated us as his equal. But that wasnt to say he was a pushover. According to Barb Torpedo and Gunnery Officer Lieutenant Max Duncan: Swish was all business on his watches and positions such as chief of the watch on the hyudraulic manifold or gun/rocket launcher captain. He dealt with people with a velvet glove. It was the glove when needed but always calm and deliberate. Swish retained his camaraderie with the men, kidded around with them, and drank his share of grog with them on liberty, as Sever put it. But first and foremost on Saunders mind was fighting the enemy and manning the guns. When it came to that, the Barbs skipper and the chief of the boat made a dynamic duo. The combination of Commander Eugene B. Fluckey and Swish Saunders was like electricity, said one shipmate. They were both of the same mold. Attack and Destroy was their motto. That lethal combination quickly made the Barb one of the most successful submarines sent against Japan. Action in the Pacific In the boats first four patrols under Fluckey, she sank the escort carrier Unyo, the frigate Gorkuko, and numerous other vessels. The Barb also rescued Australian and British prisoners of war shipwrecked for days and near death in the South China Sea. Saunders and others took turns diving into typhoon-roiled waters to pull 14 survivors aboard. On the boats 11th war patrol off the east coast of China in January 1945, Fluckey discovered secluded Namkwan Harbor, where 30 or more Japanese ships were at anchor. The skipper decided to gamble by taking the sub into the shallow harbor after midnight for a surprise surface attack. Amid confusion over where the attack was coming from, the sub would dash for open seas through uncharted waters to safety 20 miles offshore. As Fluckey put it in an address to his crew, OK, it is now time to take one of our wellknown calculated risks.

Saunders later described the scene, recalling it from his control-room vantage as the Barb inched past three roving destroyers: We creep in. You cant hear a thing but the fathometer pinging, and she says six fathoms. We could almost get out and walk. Everybodys heart is doing flipflops. The pickles are all set. Two minutes later, Fluckey gave the order to fire four torpedoes from the boats bow tubes, then brought the sub around to fire the fish in the four stern tubes. Eight torpedoes raced ahead. The harbor erupted in exploding ships and fireballs and return gunfire directed at phantom aircraft. No one could believe a sub had attacked; the harbor was too shallow. The Barb, meanwhile, raced for safety at 23 knots while using radar to plot a zig-zag course through a fleet of Chinese junks, all the while pursued by a destroyer lobbing shells at the retreating submarine. The ship gave up after a 30-minute chase. Noted Fluckey in his patrol log: The Galloping Ghost of the China Coast crossed the 20-fathom curve with a sigh. Never realized how much water that was before. However, life begins at forty (fathoms). Kept going. For the boats daring, the crew earned a Presidential Unit Citation and Fluckey the nations highest award, the Medal of Honor. For her 12th and last war patrol, the Barb was deployed from Pearl Harbor to the north coast of Japan. Fluckeys orders were to raise a rumpus by attacking shipping wherever it was found. But attacking enemy vessels wasnt the only thing the skipper contemplated. He was intent on proving that a submarine could be used to fire what he called ballistic missiles. Before casting off, he requisitioned 72 fiveinch spin-stabilized rockets, each tipped with ten pounds of explosives. A simple rocket launcher was bolted to the forward gun mount and could be raised to a 45-degree angle to simultaneously fire a dozen four-foot-long MK10 rockets, each of which had a range of nearly three miles. The skipper got his chance to make history on the night of 22 June 1945, as the sub slid unnoticed into the harbor of Shari, a city of 20,000 on the coast of Hokkaido. At Fluckeys signal, Swish and the gunnery crew unstrapped the rocket launcher, raised it to the desired angle, and ran an electrical line to a firing switch in the conning tower. On the bridge above, the skipper flipped his polarized goggles to their darkest setting and barked the order, Rockets away! An explosion of blue-white flame lit the deck. A dozen rockets lifted off and disappeared into the night sky. A minute later, several buildings in a factory district burst into flames. It was the first such rocket attack in submarine history. The Barb made good her escape and raced for the western side of the Okhotsk Sea off Karafuto, where both the skipper and the COB relished a fresh opportunity to wreak havocby blowing up a train.
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

62

NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND

The Barb saw service in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters, completed 12 war patrols, and boasted a remarkably successful career. She came through it all without a single casualty.

Attack of the Land Torpedo The captain convened a meeting in the wardroom. Eight men were chosen to undertake the mission and divided into two teams, one each for the subs two inflatable rubber boats. Lieutenant Bill Walker, the Barbs engineering officer and group leader, would lead one boat, Swish Saunders the other. All were selected for their communications and Boy Scout skills. In case they couldnt make it back to the submarine, Fluckey wanted them to have a fighting chance to live off the land. He had them practice bird whistles as a means of signaling each other in the dark. Saunders and Bill Hatfield, the boats third-class electricians mate, fashioned a 55-pound bomb out of a scuttling charge that they wired to three dry-cell batteries and placed in an empty pickle can. Saunders christened the device a land torpedo. Since it was agreed the team could not wait around to set off the bomb, Hatfield, who had worked on a railroad, devised a micro-switch detonator bolted to a wooden wedge to be snugged up tight under the rails. He knew the massive weight of a locomotive would exert enough downward pressure to trigger the switch. On the moonless night of 23 July, Fluckey gave the goahead. With the sub surfaced 950 yards from the beach, the teams set out. The commandosWalker, Saunders, Hatfield (the only married man), signalman Sever, motor machinist Jim Richard, ships cook Larry Newland, auxiliary man John Markuson, and torpedoman Edward Klinglesmithwere well equipped. They carried red-lens flashlights, watches, knives, D-rations, inflatable life jackets, cigarette lighters, a signal gun, binoculars, electrical wire, the demolition charge, carbines, tommy guns, and hand grenades. The skipper emphasized the sub would wait no more than three hoursjust 15 minutes before the first glimmer of dawn, when the boat would be exposed.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

Boys, the skipper said, if you get stuck, head for Siberia 130 miles north. Follow the mountain ranges. Good luck. Dangerous Work in the Dark The teams used compass bearings in the ink-black night to reach the beach. Leaving two men to guard the boats, the six others sprinted between two homes, stumbled through two drainage ditches, thickets, and across a highway to reach the railroad. Three split off along the tracks on guard duty. Three othersWalker, Saunders, and Hatfieldbent to the task of hollowing out stone from under the rails for the explosive. Before too long they heard someone running toward them. Hatfield picked up his weapon. Take it easy! whispered Swish. At this time of night theres no one running up this track except a scared American. It was one of their sentries, reporting a guard shack down the line with someone sleeping inside. Moments later, a locomotive came rumbling out of the dark. The men hit the ground, lying motionless alongside the track as the train passed, its engineer hanging out of the cab, looking down. With renewed urgency, Hatfield connected the charge to the switch detonator. All six then dashed for the boats and paddled furiously toward the Barb. They were halfway to the sub when they heard the sound of a northbound train. On the subs bridge, Fluckey grabbed a megaphone. paddle like the devil! he yelled. Were leaving! Seconds later, the bomb went off, throwing wreckage 200 feet into the air. Cars piled into one another and lurched off the tracks in a screeching mass of twisted, rolling metal. Silhouetted in the fireworks, the jubilant saboteurs reached the Barb and went below as the sub disappeared into the depths.

ApRIL 2011

63

Over the next few nights, the Barb moved up the coast and launched her remaining 30 rockets at the factory town of Shiritori, destroying Japans largest paper factory. Enamored of the subs utility attacking beach targets, Swish used the boats 5-inch deck gun to obliterate a leather-tanning factory that made pilot uniforms, and later directed the boats gunnery to set a shipyard afire. Additional action all around the rim of the Okhotsk destroyed many small craft and medium-sized ships to conclude one of the most audacious submarine patrols of World War II.

bat during the World War II, the Submarine Combat pin, the Victory Medal, the American Theater Medal, and the Philppine Liberation Medal. After the war, Saunders remained in the forefront of submarine missile development. He became chief of the boat in the Cusk (SS-348), which experimented with German Loon rockets. As COB in the Carbonero (SS-337), he helped develop the Regulus launch system. By the early 1960s, he was COB in the Theodore Roosevelt (SSBN-600), where he helped perfect Polaris missile launches. It was the ultimate realization of a dream that Swish and Gene Fluckey shared as pioneers in that last patrol of the Barb. Saunders spirit of adventure lived on after his retirement in 1962. He began a professional auto-racing career in California and Mexico, and earned his pilots license. When landing at the wrong airport, he famously quipped, A malfunction of the depth gauge caused a miscalculation of the depth and sank one aircraft. His wartime exploits and those of the Barb live on. A few years ago, the head of the Navy SEALs was asked why there were always eight men in a SEAL team rather than six or ten or a dozen. The admiral replied that the Barb had used The battle flag of the Barb tells the story of many sunken foes. Note the lit stick of dynamite in an eight-man team for the first the insignia-fishs hand. assault landing on the Japanese home islands. It worked, he said, so eight is the number! Looking back on his naval career prior to his death in On 2 August 1945 the Barb returned to Midway Atoll, August 2003, Saunders described his many adventures as where the Navy awarded Fluckey a fourth Navy Cross. The the product of his youth. His own welfare was secondary skipper noted his submarine had endured an estimated 400 to helping win the war against Germany and Japan and shells, bombs, and depth charges and some very narrow making the Silent Service indomitable in defense of the escapes in her last five patrols. But the boat had come United States. As he put it regarding the dangers he faced through it all without a single casualty. in the war, I was a lot younger in those days. In a final accounting, the Navy credited Fluckey with sinking 17 ships totaling 94,409 tonsnumber 1 in tonnage sunk among all American sub captains in the war.
NAVAL HISTORy & HERITAGE COMMAND

An Undying Spirit of Adventure The Navy honored Swish Saunders as one of the services most decorated enlisted men. His awards included two Silver Stars, one Bronze Star, a Presidential Unit Citation, a Navy Unit commendation, a Letter of Commendation with Ribbon in recognition of his heroic actions in com-

Sources: Captain Max Duncan, USN (Ret.), interview with the author. San Francisco Chapter, U.S. Submarine Veterans of World War II, Simon Sez, Polaris, April 1969, p 15. Paul G. Saunders biographical sketch, Sharkhunters International, www.sharkhunters.com/EPSaunders.htm. Paul G. Saunders obituary, United States Submarine Veterans Inc., 8 August 2003, www.nautilusbase.us/Patrol.html. Captain Everett H. Steinmetz, USN (Ret.), USS Barb (SS-220) and Subron 50, Polaris, June 1998, www.subvetpaul.com/SAGA_6_98.htm.

64

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

THE LEGENDARY IRONCLADS OF THE CIVIL COLLECTION

WAR
Issue Two: USS Monitor

ILLUMINATED!

A rst-ever collection of handcrafted, museum-quality replicias of the ironclads that shaped the history of warfare!

The CSS Virginia and display measures approx. 5.75" x 4 . 5" x 4".

Fine collectibles. Not intended for children under 14.

Experience the action and impact of ne crafting and incredible detail in each display

Certificate of Authenticity & 365-Day Guarantee

A superb value and risk-free ordering
9210 N. MARYLAND ST., NILES, IL 60714-1322

The legendary ironclads that changed the course of military history sail again!

Hawthorne Village presents a superb way to experience the innovations in military technology that brought the War Between the States into the world of modern warfare. The Legendary Ironclads of the Civil War Collection is a fascinating and factual re-creation of the ironclads designed to wage the floating fight that began with the battle of the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia, March 8, 1862.

Begin your collection with the heirloom-quality CSS Virginia, yours for just $49.98*, payable in two installments of just $24.99 each, the first billed with shipment. Your second shipment will be the USS Monitor, with that and future shipments billed separately, each at the same attractive price. Our unconditional 365-Day Money-Back Guarantee assures your satisfaction and you may cancel at any time.

Yes!

Limited-time OfferPlease Respond Promptly

Please enter my order for the Legendary Ironclads of the Civil War Collection, beginning with the CSS Virginia, as described in this announcement. SEND NO MONEY NOW!
Signature Mrs. Mr. Ms. Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Address City E-Mail State Apt. No. Zip

Superbly handcrafted and finely detailed

Very strong demand is expected from history buffs and Civil War enthusiastsand intricate hand-crafting could mean limited availability for these fine-quality models. Dont wait and risk disappointment. Send no money now. Simply mail the coupon today to reserve your complete collection!

This landmark collection could soon be legendact now!

Intense Demand Expected! Dont Miss Out!

This collection is a must-have, as the meticulous crafting and attention to detail makes each display a true masterpiece. Each ship and crew member is sculpted in impressive miniature while floating in clear acrylic water to enable viewing above and below. In addition, each ironclad is illuminated from within. These displays meet museum-quality standards, certain to thrill you with their fine crafting and historical accuracytransporting you into the battle!

www.bradfordexchange.com

2011 Hawthorne Village 14-01129-001-BI

product availability. Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.

* Plus $8.99 shipping and service. All sales subject to acceptance and

917564-E14101

Historic Fleets
Eyewitness to the Fall of Fort Sumter

By Robert J. Cressman

he wooden steam sloop Pawnee pounded toward the South Carolina coast through heavy seas and gale-force winds in the early hours of 12 April 1861. The weather and darkness made it difficult to distinguish landmarks, but the warships commanding officer, 52-yearold Commander Stephen C. Rowan, recorded his arrival as near the position assigned me as the badness of the weather would allow me to judge. Once in position off Charleston Harbor, Rowan ordered his men to quarters and the guns loaded with shell. The packet steamer Baltic drew near in the storm, bringing with her Captain

1826. His ship, however, was a relatively new addition to the Navy. Laid down in October 1858 at the Philadelphia Navy Yard, the Pawnee slid down the launching ways on 8 October 1859. Miss Grace Tyler christened the ship with a bottle of claret broken on the figurehead of a great Pawnee chief. She was commissioned at her building yard, Commander Henry J. Hartstene in command. Secretary of the Navy Isaac Toucey had recommended ten steamers of light draft, great speed and heavy guns in his annual report of 1857. Congress authorized eightseven screw sloops and one sidewheeleron 12 June 1858. Of

NAVAL HISTORY AND HERITAGE COMMAND

A view, looking aft, from the Pawnees forecastle, where a bewhiskered old salt poses with the ships single 100-pounder Parrott rifle circa 1863-64. The starboard battery of four IX-inch Dahlgren smoothbores can be seen in the background. Awnings shade her deck, and crewmen can be seen sitting amidships.

Gustavus Vasa Fox, who was eager to set his brainchildthe relief of Fort Sumterinto motion. (See story, p. 18.) The Pawnees captain, however, when told of Foxs intent to proceed apace with the mission, said his orders required him to await the arrival of the sidewheel steamer Powhatan. (Unbeknownst to either man, the latter had been ordered elsewhere.) Then, in reply to Foxs invitation to stand in toward the bar, Rowan responded firmly that he was not going in there and inaugurate civil war. Commander Rowan, a native of Ireland, was a seasoned seaman, having won appointment as a midshipman in

the sloops, four were to draw 13 feet, three were to draw 10. John Willis Griffiths received a government appointment to design the largest of the three ships ordered to the latter specification. The 49-year-old son of a New York shipwright and an innovative naval architect in his own right, Griffiths designed a screw steamer of greater length and beam than her near-sisters, which, when fully outfitted, drew less than the 10-foot draft specified. People identified the Pawnee so closely with her designer that some referred to her as the Griffiths ship. The Pawnees main battery consisted of four XI-inch Dahlgren smoothbores and

eight IX-inch Dahlgrens. The former were iron guns, each weighing 15,700 pounds that could hurl a 136-pound shell nearly a mile (1,712 yards) with a 15-pound charge, and 1,975 yards with a 20-pound charge. An experienced crew could fire one round every 1.74 minutes for an hour; over a three-hour span the time increased to 2.86 minutes per round. In a real emergency, a good crew could fire a round every 1.33 minutes. The IX-inchers, also of iron, each weighed 9,000 pounds and could hurl a 72.5-pound projectile 1,740 yards, or 75-pound shrapnel 1,690 yards, in both cases using a 10-pound charge. The Philadelphia firm of Reaney and Neafie, under the supervision of Chief Engineer William W. W. Wood and R. H. Lang, constructed the Pawnees engines. A pair of horizontal direct-acting cylinders, measuring 65 inches in diameter by a 36-inch stroke, drove a 7-foot-3inch master gear wheel, asymmetrically installed just off the centerline to port, which in turn drove two smaller pinions 2 feet, 11 inches in diameter. Unlike the other steamers in the 1858 budget, which had single screws, her propulsion plant drove twin four-bladed screws, each 9 feet in diameter. She could make 10 knots top speed. Given the heavy battery and the weight of the engines needed to drive two screws, Griffiths designed the ship with a concave hull form. The Pawnee sailed on 14 September 1860 for the Gulf of Mexico, with Flag Officer George J. Pendergrast embarked. Arriving off Vera Cruz, Mexico, on 15 October, she operated with the Home Squadron for less than two months, returning to Philadelphia shortly before Christmas of 1860 to be placed in ordinarya noncommissioned statussoon after her arrival. But she was recommissioned on 31 December, Lieutenant Samuel Marcy in command. Amid growing tensions between North and South, Rowan relieved Marcy on 18 January 1861. By that time four slave states had seceded from the Union; three more were to follow suit within a fortnight. Although married to a Virginian and fond of the South, Rowan stood firmly loyal to the Union. The political crisis worsened, and within a few weeks Fox, a former naval
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

66

J. M. CAIELLA

Pawnee-class wooden-hull steam sloop-of-war, second rate

Displacement 1,533 tons

The steam-powered Pawnee was launched in October 1859 at the Philadelphia Navy Yard. She was built at a cost of $457,151.12.

standing toward the Ultimately, the Sumter force that Fox harbor entrance. had wanted to resupply ended up being Length 233 feet (overall) Rowan ordered his embarked in the Baltic on 15 April. The Beam 47 feet ships launch and one badly battered fort had been surrendered Draft 11 feet (mean) of the cutters readied to Confederate forces and duly occupied. and armed for the As the flag that had flown over Sumters Armament (1860) Four XI-inch Dahlgren smoothbores purpose. ramparts snapped in the wind from the Eight IX-inch Dahlgren smoothbores Only then did those Baltics main truck that afternoon, the Complement 151 officers and men and Marines in the relief squadron Pawnees men joined in three hearty hear cannon fire and cheers for the Stars and Stripes. realize that the fort was under attack (as officer, commander of merchantmen, But the war was not over for it had been for a time) and the war Rowan and manufacturer, was presenting a plan the Pawnee, which went on to see had not wanted to inaugurate had, in fact, to Brevet Lieutenant General Winfield considerable service during the conflict. begun. As the Baltic stood out, Captain Scott in Washington, D.C., for the relief She retained her eight IX-inch Dahlgrens of Fort Sumter. Fox chose for the rest of the war. the Pawnee for inclusion, By 5 May 1863 she also reasoning that she was mounted a 100-pounder the only available steam Parrott riflecapable vessel of war north of the of firing solid shot and Gulf of Mexico . . . [with] long shellsand a heavy guns. He had also 50-pounder Dahlgren. For noted that As a steamer a brief period in 1864, she she seems to be a failure, mounted four additional but she may be got ready for IX-inchers. Soon after this emergency; at least she hostilities ended, the is, unfortunately our only Pawnee carried one resource. light 12-pounder and a The Pawnee sailed from THE STEAM NAVY OF THE UNITED STATES, BY FRANK M. BENNETT 24-pounder howitzer. Washington on the morning This cutaway elevation of the Pawnee shows her asymmetrically mounted master Naval historian K. Jack of 6 April 1861, reaching wheel (c) and her unusual concave hull. Bauer praised the Pawnee Norfolk the next day to take as a notable sea boat, on the supplies made ready but contended that her Fox noted the Pawnee standing in. Rowan for her. After his Bluejackets had stowed machinery [had been] poorly built. hailed Fox, saying that if he could get them, Rowan planned to sail at daylight Eventually, the excessive cost attendant a pilot, he would take his ship in and on 9 April, but a heavy gale, blowing to repairs of her engines prompted their share the fate of his Army brethren. As since the previous Sunday, delayed removal in 1869-70. The Pawnee served the guns bombarding Sumter thundered departure until the following morning. as a floating store- and hospital-ship until in the distance, Fox went on board the Now, two days later, he and Foxs July 1874, then a receiving ship, and Pawnee and convinced Rowan that the little flotilla were off Charleston. The ended her days as a store-ship at Port Government did not expect any such Baltic, carrying the Sumter-bound Royal, South Carolina. There, on 3 May gallant sacrifice of sharing whatever supplies, and accompanied by the 1884, she was sold to M. H. Gregory of awaited the Army. revenue cutter Harriet Lane, began Great Neck, New York, for $6,011.
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

APRIL 2011

67

In Contact continued from page 9

Robert Stern

Regarding James Hornfischers article, I believe a few clarifying comments would be useful. While it adds to the drama to state that neither the Washington (BB-56) nor South Dakota (BB-57) was put through the usual round of sea trials prior to deployment, this is not in fact the case. The South Dakota, the newer of the two, had put in two months of shakedown between the beginning of June 1942 and the end of July, and had a three-weeklong post-shakedown yard period before departing for the South Pacific. The Washington, which had been in commission since May 1941, had spent the period between March and July 1942 operating with the Royal Navy from Scapa Flow and The Kids War Service Hvalfjordur. Describing a night action is always difLieutenant Commander Robert L. ficult, and describing one in which several Bratman, U.S. Naval Reserve (Retired) of the participants were sunk even more so, but a little clarification of the order in In Paul Stillwells Looking Back (A which events happened among the four Night at the Ballpark, February, p. 6), van destroyers would help. In particular, he states that Jerry Coleman was a it would be difficult to explain how the Marine Corps pilot and the only majorexplosion of the Prestons fire rooms, which league player who RJ-Bender-CWUUSMC-hp-ad_Layout 1 1/18/11 8:17 PM Page 1 fought in combat in

occurred a few minutes before she rolled over at 2337, could have rained oil and debris on the Benham after she was torpedoed in the bow at 2338. It is possible that the clocks on the Benham and Preston were not set identically or that after-thefact reporting might misstate the timing of events by a few minutes. Still, the only way the debris and oil from Preston ahead could fall on the Benham, which had been ahead of the Preston in line, is to note, as Hornfischer did not, that the Benham turned back briefly toward the sinking Preston. Some sources say this wasdone to aid the Preston, others that it was done to escape concentrated gunfire. But regardless, the Benhams CO found his ship rapidly losing speed and increasingly difficult to control and decided to turn back again, away from the Preston and from the Japanese.

both World War II and the Korean War. Wrong! Try Ted Williams, who also flew in combat in both World War II and Korea as a Marine Corps pilot. There are probably others, but Williams, for obvious reasons,stands out.

Mr. Stillwell responds:

Ted Williams joined the Boston Red Sox in 1939 and began a spectacular baseball career. In 1941 he compiled a batting average of .406; no player has had an average that high in the succeeding 70 years. At the time he was classified 3-A in draft status because he provided sole support for his mother. When World War II came in late 1941, he was reclassified as 1-A, fit to be drafted. Williams protested and regained his previous status. But public opinion was against him, so the stubborn Williams enlisted in the Navy in May 1942 and entered the V-5 flight-training program. He earned his wings as a naval aviator and a commission in the Marine Corps Reserve in May 1944. The exceptional eyesight that served him so well as a hitter in baseball also made him very capable as an aerial gunner. After he was commissioned he served as a flight instructor at
In Contact continued on page 70

This book is the first in-depth study of Civil War Marine uniforms and equipment ever undertaken, and it includes hundreds of contemporary studio portraits of officers and men wearing the items described and illustrated in the 1859 uniform regulations plus hundreds of color photographs of surviving material. There are complete chapters on the evolution of Marine insignia, swords, headdress, and all types of uniforms and clothing, to include the origin of the Marine officers quatrefoil plus a listing of officers/enlisted men at Marine barracks and on board various ships. Author signed and serial numbered copies still available. There is no other reference book of this magnitude on Marine dress and equipment of the period. 296 pages 475 Color Photos and Period Portraits Large Format Deluxe Binding $79.95 +$4 postage P.O. Box 23456 San Jose, CA 95153 408/225-5777 Fax: 408/225-4739 rbender@bender-publishing.com www.bender-publishing.com

68

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

NH

NEW RELEASE USS Iwo Jima LPH-2, Vietnam War, Operation Deckhouse V, 45 min.
SOME OF OUR MOST POPULAR TITLES

Sub Training 1960s, 60 min. Submarine & Missile Programs Binh Thuy Naval Base, Includes Naval Support Facilities, 60 min. Sub Service 1940s-50s, 104 min. 1970s, 60 min. USS Intrepid CVS-11 Vietnam 1965-68 With Above & Below Deck, 60 min. Sub Warfare: WWII, 110 min. USS Robert E. Lee & USS Lewis Small Boat Warfare Vietnam, 90 min. FBM Submarines/ Sailors, 85 min. and Clark, 60 min. Naval Support Facilities Da Nang, Camp Tien Sha, , 60 min. USS Triton Undersea, 30 min. Sub Service In 1970s, 55 min. USS Nimitz: 1976 To Early 1980s With VAW-116 & VF-84, 50 min. Carriers: Each One Is Different! USS Yorktown CV-10 Vietnam 1965-68, 45 min. P2V Neptune 1940s-50s, 75 minutes Flight Deck Activities, Below Deck and Much More! F-14 Tomcat and Navy Fighter Weapons School at Miramar 1970s, 100 min. USS Wasp (CVA-18) 1944-72, USS Ticonderoga (CVA-14) off Heavy Cruisers 1930s-1960s, 90 min. With Gemini Capsule, 60 min. Vietnam, 30 min. Guantanamo Naval Base (GITMO) in the 1950s and 1960s, 60 min. USS Hancock (CV-19) 1940-60s, USS Saratoga CV-60, 1956-69, With Vietnam Air Strikes, 60 min. Pres. Eisenhower & Nixon, 60 min. Boot Camp for Sailors Boot Camp for Marines USS Essex (CV-9) 1940-1960s USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA Boot Camp Great Lakes: 1940s, 45 min. MCRD San Diego 1950s, 30 min. With Apollo 7, 70 min. 31) 1950s-60s, 45 min. Boot Camp San Diego: 1940s, 50 min. MCRD San Diego 1969 & 1973, 45 min. USS America (CVA-66) 1965-68, USS Franklin (CV-13) in WWII And Boot Camp San Diego: 1950s, 75 min. MCRD San Diego 75-Year History: With A-7 & F-4 Aircraft, 60 min. 25th Reunion Aboard Ship, 90 min. Boot Camp San Diego: 1960s & Advanced WWII, Korea, Vietnam, 60 min USS Midway (CVA-41) 1945-70 USS Oriskany (CV-34) in Vietnam Training, 60 min. MCRD San Diego 1980s, 55 min With Launch of V-2 Rocket, 60 min. Above & Below Deck, 40 min. Boot Camp San Diego: 1970s & Advanced MCRD Parris Island in the 1950s, 60 min USS Hornet (CV-8, CV-12) WWII USS Oriskany 1966 Fire, 60 min. Training, 50 min. MCRD Parris Island 1960s, 45 min. With Torpedo Sqdn. 8, 60 min. USS JF Kennedy (CVA-67) 1970s For Drill Instructors Only: San Diego and USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) 1965-70, 80s With F-4s & F-14s, 70 min. LSTs in World War II Parris Island From the DIs View, 60 min Flight Line, Engine Room, 50 min. Naval Reserves 1960s & 70s, LST Training In World War II, 80 min. USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) 1961-79 Including USS JFK, 93 min. LSTs WWII: European Theater, 72 min. Seabees: & Frigate USS Standley, 75 min. USS Independence (CVA-62) 1960s LSTs in the Pacific WWII, 65 min. Seabees & Marine Corps Combat Opera USS Ranger (CVA-61) 1956-83, & Mediterranean Cruise, 90 min. tions in the Pacific WWII, 70 min. Coast Guard: WestPac Cruises, 70 min. USS Forrestal (CV-59) 1950s-60s, USS Roosevelt (CVB-42) 1940sWith VF-74, 90 min. Coast Guard Action WWII, 45 minutes Seabees Normandy/Europe WWII, 90 min Seabees and Marine Corps Engineers in 50s, Great Below Deck!, 45 min. USS Forrestal 1967 Fire, 72 min. Coast Guard at Normandy, 70 min. Vietnam, 45 min. USS Roosevelt (CVB-42) 1960s USS Boxer (CV-21) 1950s With Coast Guard in Vietnam, 60 minutes Above & Below Deck, 90 min. 1952 Fire, 70 min. USS Princeton 1950s-60s, 60 min. Iowa Class Battleships, USS Iowa, New Jersey, Missouri & Wisconsin, 1940s-50s, 120 min. USS Philippine Sea (CV-47) Carrier Pilot Training 1960s-70s Destroyer Escorts 1940s & 1950s, 50 min. 1940s-50s, off Korea, 50 min. USS Lexington, Eisenhower, 90 min Shipboard Living Aboard Destroyers 1940s-50s, 65 min USS Randolph (CV-15) 1945-67, Carrier History: Langley To Enter Navy Frogmen, Underwater Demolition Teams and Navy SEALs, 105 minutes With ASW Action, 45 min. prise, 90 min. Navy WAVES and Coast Guard SPARS from the 1940s - 1970s, 60 min. USS Valley Forge (CV-45) 1949 Essex Class Carriers WWII (origi Light Cruisers Go To War: 1930s-1950s, 70 min. 1966, Korea and Vietnam, 60 min. More nally titled Fighting Lady), 60 min. Destroyers & Their Sailors, WWI-Vietnam, 100 min. USS Shangri-La (CV-38) 1944-68, Navy Carrier Action Off Korea, 75 min. Navy Deep Sea Diving 1940s, 55 min. With Destroyer Collision, 45 min. Titles Underway Replenishment 1940s-60s, 60 min. USS Constellation (CVA-64) 1964- Light Carriers 1940s-50s, 70 min. Escort Carrier 1940s-50s, 75 min. Deep Sea Rescue Vechicles (DSRV), 1970s, 50 min 1970 With A-4s, 45 min. Carrier Crashes & Landings King Neptune Ceremony 1930s-70s: Pollywog to Shellback rituals, 60 min. USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) 19601940s-60s, 60 min. Naval Gun At Iwo Jima & Okinawa, 40 min. Armed Guard/Merchant Marine WWII, 80 min. 70 & Around World Cruise, 90 min. Suicide Attack in the Pacific WWII: Early Days of Naval Aviation, 110 min. Navy Diving 1960s: Medical Aspects, 60 min. USS Enterprise 1969 Fire off HaKamikazes and aftermath, 93 min. Navy Gun 1950s, Firing the Big Guns, 90 min. Six and Eight Inch Rapid Fire Guns, 30 min. waii & 1968 Gulf of Tonkin, 45 min. Arctic Operations 1950s Overview, and 1955 & 1956 Film Reports, 120 minutes Flight to the South Pole, Adm. Byrd Story and Operation Deep Freeze 1, 85 minutes

Submarine Titles: World War II Through The 1970s

We Have 100s More Titles

In Contact continued from page 68

Earn Your MastEr of arts in MilitarY HistorY onlinE

Explore the framework through which important military events are understood.
Since 1819, Norwich University has played an important role in military history as the birthplace of Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC), as an institution whose graduates have fought in every war since its founding and as the leader among military schools in racial integration, and the integration of women into its corps of cadets. What better place to study military history?

the Pensacola Naval Air Station. In the summer of 1945 he received operational training in the F4U Corsair fighter. Had the war lasted longer than it did, Williams probably would have gotten into combat because he received orders for duty overseas. Instead, the Japanese ceased hostilities in August 1945 and formally surrendered the following month. Williams left active duty in early 1946, rejoined the Red Sox, and played in that years World Series against the St. Louis Cardinals. During the Korean War a few years later, Williams was recalled to active duty and served as an F9F Panther pilot in combat. In February 1953 he barely escaped being killed in a crash landing after his aircraft was damaged as a result of being hit over North Korea. He left active duty in July 1953 and rejoined the Red Sox, for whom he played until 1960.

David McCampbellhe was transferred to VF-15. Morris was credited with downing seven Japanese aircraft and survived the war. Three of the Hellcats he flew had to be pushed over the side because they were too shot up to be of further use. On release from the Navy in 1945, he resumed his film career, appearing in several movies and on television in the late 1940s and early 50s. In 1959 the USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA-11) pulled into Oakland, California, where the ships skipper, then-Captain David McCampbell, invited Bert and other ex-squadron mates to come aboard for a short cruise and breakfast. After eating a hearty meal, Morris climbed five ladders to the bridge, where he collapsed and died. His remains now rest at Arlington National Cemetery.

McCampbells Famous Nephew Captain James E. Wise Jr., U.S. Navy (Retired)
Concerning Hellcat Ace in a DayTwice! (February, pp. 1823), Captain McCampbell is a major player in the Wayne Morris chapter of Stars in Blue: Movie Actors in Americas Sea Service, which I coauthored with Anne Rehill (Naval Institute Press, 1997). The following is based on an excerpt from the chapter. During World War II, COURTESY OF CAPTAIN JAMES E. WISE JR., USN (RET) one Hollywood star not During World War II, thenCommander David McCampbell only got into the action (left) had his movie-star relative, Lieutenant Bert Wayne but became an air ace: Morris (right), transferred to his fighter squadron. Bert DeWayne Morris J r. , p o p u l a r l y k n o w n as Wayne Morris. He flew Hellcats off Editors note: In his U.S. Naval Institute the USS Essex (CV-9) as a member of oral history, McCampbell recalled that there Fighting Fifteen. Following flight trainwere few good movies in the Essexs wardroom ing and receiving his wings, Morris was for officers to watch during down time: initially assigned as a flight instructor at NAS Hutchinson, Kansas. Determined Captain McCampbell: I remember we to see action, he requested assignment to got ahold of one movie, a Wayne Morris a fighter squadron. His request got him movie, Kid Galahad, and they must have transferred to Jacksonville, Florida, not shown that six or eight times. for fighter duty but for PBY training. He Paul Stillwell: Since he was on board. hand delivered a second request to the Captain McCampbell: Yes. [Laughter] Bureau of Naval Personnel, again requestHe got real fed up with that. He told the ing assignment to a fighter squadron, and exec that hed had enough of seeing his own with a little help from his wifes uncle movie: Please get something else.
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

The unique online format offers students:

a dynamic, interactive, educational environment a manageable pace for busy adults coursework that can be completed in as little as 18 months dedicated 24/7 support

For more information on this online degree, visit

www.militaryhistory.norwich.edu/usnin

or call 1.800.460.5597 Ext. 3372

70
NU_MHH_Naval His 2.125 x 9.5 Print ad.indd 1 3/20/09 1:46:42 PM

As soon as I heard her breath stop, I knew shed seen it. She absolutely loves it. Stauer Customer N.Y. from Operation Iraqi Freedom

The Sigh Heard Round the World

One soldiers incredible true story about the top secret operation that took his wifes breath away.

t was an American soldier in Iraq who showed me the true power of a piece of jewelry. He wrote to tell us that shortly after marrying his sweetheart he received orders to return to active duty as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Like a true romantic, he wasnt about to let 7000 miles (or a war) ruin their first Christmas as husband and wife. He found the perfect gift from Stauer and asked his new bride to call him when it arrived. So far away, I would not be able to see her reaction, but I wanted to hear it, he wrote. On the day the package arrived, she called as promised. With her husband listening, halfway around the world on the end of the line, she opened the box and slowly lifted the lid. As soon as I heard her breath stop, I knew shed seen it, the soldier wrote. Even though they were oceans and continents

apart, in that instant the newlyweds were reunited. Romance wins again. I love that story. I want to hear more of those stories, lots more. Those kind of unforgettable moments are the reason that the Emerald-Cut DiamondAura Gial Ring exists. In the fine tradition of jewelry designed to take her breath away, we created this stunning showcase for a magnificent 4 -carat yellow, lab-created DiamondAura. Layered in platinum over sterling silver, the luxurious golden yellow centerpiece is highlighted by dozens of sparkling white DiamondAura rounds. Natural fancy yellow diamonds are some of the rarest stones on Earth. Browse through the auction catalogs of the worlds most exclusive gem dealers and youll find that a fancy yellow mined stone can fetch as much as hundreds of thousands per carat. But thanks to science weve found a way to offer you even more fire and clarity than natural stones without costing you a fortune. Our vivid lab-created stones are practically indistinguishable to the naked eye from mined diamonds. And, according to the book, Jewelry and Gems: The Buying Guide, the technique used in DiamondAura offers, the best diamond simulation made to date, and even some jewelers have mistaken these stones for mined diamonds.

Your satisfaction is guaranteed. We invite you to sample the Emerald-Cut DiamondAura Gial Ring for 30 days and if you arent completely captivated, return it for a full refund of your purchase price. Were sure that it will leave her breathless and at under $150, its very affordable even on a soldiers salary. But dont take our word for it. Order yours today and then... wait for the sigh.
JEWELRY SPECS: - 4 carat golden yellow DiamondAura ring - Platinum-layered .925 sterling silver setting

DiamondAura Gial Ring (4 ctw) $295

Now only $145 + S&P Save $150 Earrings (6 ctw) $295 $145 + S&P Necklace (5 ctw) $295 $145 + S&P

Set (11 ctw) $590 $195 + S&P

Set includes necklace and earrings.

Promotional Code GLR120-01

Please mention this code when you call.

Stauer has a Better Business Bureau Rating of A+

USING THE RING SIZE CHART Place one of her rings on top of one of the circle diagrams. Her ring size is the circle that matches the inside diameter of the ring diagram. If her ring falls between sizes, order the next larger size.

Stauer

Dept. GLR120-01

14101 Southcross Drive W., Burnsville, Minnesota 55337

Smar t LuxuriesSurprising Prices

Stauer.com

Call now to take advantage of this extremely limited offer.

1-800-915-4635

Naval History News continued from page 11

Seeking the Revenge of Perry

New England divers announced in January that they have discovered what they believe is the shipwreck of the U.S. Navy schooner Revenge, which sank off the Rhode Island coast in 1811. Her skipper? A young lieutenant named Oliver Hazard Perry, who soon moved on to bigger and better things. While en route from Newport, Rhode Island, to New London, Connecticut, the Revenge hit a reef in a storm, ran aground, and was abandoned. Perry was absolved of responsibility in the

AP

A cannon may mark the spot where Oliver Hazard Perrys ship went down: New England divers say they have located the wreck of the Revenge.

USS NEW MEXICO (BB-40) The Queens story in the words of her men
An oral history of a veteran of the Pacific By John C. Driscoll

ensuing court of inquiry (the pilot took the blame). After a leave of absence, Perry returned to service and assumed command of the U.S. naval force on Lake Erie in the War of 1812. On 10 September 1813, he earned his place in the pantheon of American naval heroes with his Dont give up the ship victory at the Battle of Lake Erie. As the divers who made the recent shipwreck discovery mused when making their announcement, the wreck of the Revenge in a sense altered the course of naval history by altering the career trajectory of Perry, indirectly setting the

stage for his Lake Erie billet and his date with destiny. One of the divers, Charles Buffum, said he had been fascinated with stories of the Revenge wreck since childhood. He and his fellow ship-hunters actually first knew they were onto something in 2005, when they located a cannon; since then they have found four more cannon, an anchor, and enough other artifacts that they are now 99 percent sure that this is the Revenge site. A true smoking gun identifier, such as a ships bell, has yet to turn up, however. Meanwhile, the discoverers have notified Naval History & Heritage Command of the find.

Cradle of Naval Aviation Kicks off Centennial Year

Naval Air Station Pensacola on 20 January kicked off a years worth of celebrations in honor of the centennial of naval aviation. The event featured the fly-by of a vintage-painted T-39 Saberliner and speeches to mark the opening of 2011 festivities. R e a r A d m i r a l J o s e p h K i l k e n n y, Commander, Naval Education and Training Command, addressed a crowd of more than 500 people: In this year of 2011, we absolutely know how aviation positively impacts our maritime forces, and is essential to the defense of our republic. That was not always the case. In 1901 Rear Admiral George Melville wrote in the North American Review that neither the dirigible airship nor the powered flying machine would ever prove of any use commercially, let alone in warfare. Rear Admiral Melville called flight wholly unwarranted if not absurd. Well, nobody ever said making admiral gives you wisdom. Other speakers at the event included C a p t a i n C h r i s t o p h e r P l u m m e r, commanding officer of NAS Pensacola, and Florida Governor Rick Scott. The Navy officially dates the beginning of its aviation element to 8 May 1911, when the services first aircraft were requisitioned. Marine
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

536 pages, PB. $27.98 (Including shipping) 62142 Cody Jr. Rd., Bend, OR 97701 john.c.driscoll@us.army.mil (541) 815-1371

Acrylic Cases
Custom-made acrylic boxes, frames and bases to display your treasured collectibles.
TODAYS ACRYLIC MFG. CORP.
70A EAST JEFRYN BLVD, DEER PARK, NY 11729 (631)243-1882 FAX (631)243-1883 e-mail: cases@todaysacrylic.com http://www.todaysacrylic.com

72

Handcrafted Ready-Made Museum Quality Mahogany Aircraft/Ship Models LET US CUSTOM MAKE YOUR AIRCRAFT OR SHIP www.motionmodels.com 1-800-866-3172

USS HORNET (CV-8) Doolittle

All Yorktowns

PT-565

All Elko PTs

Corps aviation dates its birth to 22 May 1912, when First Lieutenant Alfred A. Cunningham reported for duty as the first Marine Corps aviator. The 20 January date for Pensacolas kickoff was selected to coincide with the arrival of the team who would develop the first training program and base. As Captain Plummer noted in his address to the crowd, Today marks the exact day 97 years ago20 January 1914in the spot where Lieutenant John H. Towers and Lieutenant Commander Henry C. Mustin landed in Pensacola. Towers was the officer-in-charge of an aviation unit from the U.S. Naval Academy, consisting of nine officers and 23 Sailors who arrived on board the battleship Mississippi and cargo ship Orion to set up a Navy flying school at Pensacola. This cadre of naval officers and Sailors erected what became known as the cradle of naval aviation, said Plummer. The rest is history.

A Call for Cold War Papers

USS SUMNER/ GEARING Destroyer All DD/DEs USS ST. LOUIS (CL-50) All Cruisers

USS MISSOURI (BB-63)

All BBs

USS ESSEX (CV-9)

All CVs

IJN AKAGI Pearl Harbor

KM BISMARCK

U-BOAT Type VII

USS CAPITAINE

GATO/BALAO-Class Sub

USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65)

All CVA/CVNs

Most Late Subs

AEGIS Cruiser

USS AMERICA (CV-66) 36 model custom made for Adm. Leighton Smith

All DDGs

Many more ships available.

The largest catalog selection & website of custom & ready-made ships & aircraft anywhere. Catalog has over 1200 models in COLOR. Specializing in CUSTOM MADE & cataloged models.Vets & active,let us make you what you served on or flew.GIANT 120-page, full-color catalog $5.00 (refundable with order).FLYERS, SAILORS, COLLECTORS,WE TALK YOUR LANGUAGE. Layaway plans available

Motion Models,4613 N.University Dr.#290,Coral Springs,FL 33067-4602

email: mrmotion@myacc.net phone 954-344-8512 (8870) fax

www.motionmodels.com

The John A. Adams Center at the Virginia Military Institute has announced that, for the seventh year, it will award prizes for the best unpublished papers dealing with the U.S. military in the Cold War era (194591). Any aspect of the Cold War military is eligible subject matter, with papers on war planning, operations, intelligence, logistics, and mobilization especially welcome. Essays that relate the Korean and Southeast Asian conflicts to the larger Cold War are also open for consideration. The first-place prizes are a plaque and a cash award of $2,000; second place garners $1,000 and a plaque; third place will receive $500 and a plaque. Entries should be tendered to the Adams Center at VMI by 31 July. Submissions should be in Microsoft Word and limited to a maximum of 25 pages of double-spaced text (exclusive of documentation and bibliography). Over the summer, a panel of judges will examine all papers. The Adams Center will announce the winners in the fall. Awardwinning entries will be considered for publication by the Journal of Military History. In addition, the Adams Center will post select papers on its Web site, pending authors permissions. Submissions and questions should be directed to: Director, John A. Adams 71 Center for Military History and Strategic Analysis, c/o Deneise P. Shafer, Department of History, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA 24450; shaferdp@vmi.edu; 540/4647447/7338; fax 540/464-7246.

74

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

For those Who Value Freedom and Honor Above All Else

Those honorable individuals who choose to serve our country as members of the United States Navy, risking their lives to preserve our precious freedom... we salute you! And now, we would like to show our gratitude and appreciation with a jewelry exclusive as impressive as the most distinquished seaborne military force in the world.

Precision Crafted Stainless Steel and Black Onyx in an Exclusive Design

A Singular Achievement in Craftsmanship and Design Finely hand-crafted in stainless steel, the Show Your Pride Navys Mens Bracelet features a stylish 8 1/2" link-chain bracelet with a two-tone silver and gold nish. At the center of the bracelet, a U.S. Navy emblem featuring an eagle, a ag and a crossedanchor in a polished golden nishstands out proudly against a black onyx center stone, anked by raised-relief stars and stripes. A Remarkable Value ... Available for a Limited Time This bold bracelet is an outstanding value at just $89*, which you can pay for in 4 installments of $22.25. To reserve yours, complete with jewelry pouch, gift box and Certicate of Authenticity, and backed by our 120-day guarantee, send no money now; just ll out and mail the Reservation Application. But hurry ... this is a limited-time offer!
www.bradfordexchange.com

Golden Navy emblem featuring the eagle, ag and crossed-anchor stands out against a genuine black onyx inlay and is anked on both sides with three golden stars and textured stripes
Neither the U.S. Navy nor any other component of the Department of Defense has approved, endorsed, or authorized this product.

LIMITED-TIME OFFER
Reservations will be accepted on a rst-come, rst-served basis. Respond as soon as possible to reserve your bracelet.

RESERVATION APPLICATION
th e

SEND NO MONEY NOW

 
j e w e l ry

9345 Milwaukee Avenue Niles, IL 60714-1393

YES. Please reserve the Show Your Pride Navy Mens

Bracelet for me as described in this announcement.
Signature Mrs. Mr. Ms.
Name (Please Print Clearly)

Shown actual size

*Plus $9.00 shipping and service. Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery of your jewelry item after we receive your initial deposit. Sales subject to product availability and credit approval.

Address City State Email (optional) Zip

01-11245-001-E37101

2010 BGE 01-11245-001-BIU

Book Reviews
Passport Not Required: U.S. Volunteers in the Royal Navy, 1939-1941
Eric Dietrich-Berryman, Charlotte Hammond, and R. E. White. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2010. 186 pp. Illus. Index. $27.95. Reviewed by John Hattendorf

water demolition team that became the forerunner of present-day SEAL teams and eventually became a rear admiral in 1960. Peter Morison was the only son of the famous Harvard historian Samuel Eliot Morison.

remembrance of all the men who volunteered for this unusual service.
Dr. Hattendorf is Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History, chairman of the Maritime History Department, and director of the Naval War College Museum at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island.

All Americans who have visited the famous Painted Hall at the Old Royal Naval College at Greenwich, England, during the past 70 years will probably have noticed the intriguing floor stone with the inscription, 15 June 1941. On this day came three citizens of the United States of America, the first of their countrymen to become Sea Officers of the Royal Navy. The three authors of Passport Not Required have long been enticed by the unanswered questions that the inscribed stone has posed: Who were these officers? Were there others? How did they manage to do this? What became of them? For most naval historians, the story of the Americans who volunteered to serve as officers in the Royal Navy at the outbreak of World War II has been known only through the single account that one of them, Alex Cherry, published in 1951 titled, Yankee, R.N. This new slim volume provides further valuable information about this fascinating episode in Anglo-American cooperation during that war. The authors show that there were 22 American citizens commissioned in the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (RNVR) during the period of American neutrality in the first phase of the war. The June 1941 date on the Greenwich stone merely indicates when three of them came to Greenwich for training. The first of those who joined the RNVR was William Taylor, who was commissioned on 14 September 1939; the last of the group was Peter Morison, commissioned on 10 November 1941. The Americans personalities, backgrounds, experiences in the Royal Navy, and subsequent careers were as diverse as those of any group of naval volunteers. The one who went furthest in the U.S. Navy on his return was Draper Kaufman, who subsequently became famous for organizing the first U.S. naval under-

Guadalcanal, Tarawa and Beyond: A Mud Marines Memoir of the Pacific Island War
William W. Rogal. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2010. 214 pp. Illus. Bib. Index. $29.95. Reviewed by Richard Frank

John Parker, one of the three commemorated on the Greenwich stone, was commissioned 7 June 1941. Parker was quickly assigned to serve in HMS Broadwater (H-81), originally the American-built Clemson-class flush-deck four-piper USS Mason (DD-191) that had been transferred to the Royal Navy in the Destroyers for Bases Agreement in 1940. On 17 October 1941, U-101 sank the Broadwater 400 miles south of Iceland while she was guarding an American convoy. Among those who lost their lives was Parker, the first American citizen to die in combat as a British naval officer. The authors also relate the subsequent commemoration of these Americans through a supplementary memorial, which was dedicated at Greenwich in October 2001 to record the names of all 22 Americans and a memorial to the Broadwater in Chichester Cathedral. This useful work is a welcome contribution to the literature on AngloAmerican naval cooperation that serves both as an excellent supplement to Cherrys classic 1951 account, as well as a

If I were asked to identify a model combat memoir, this would be it. William W. Rogal has a great story, and he tells it deftly. He shrewdly incorporates other sources for essential background to his personal experiences. He is ever mindful of his comrades, often detailing the exact circumstances of wounds and deaths. Finally, he comprehends that it is far better to leave the reader wishing for more than to leave him looking ahead to see how much more there is left to read. As did so many Marines of that era, Rogal grew up during the Depression in humble circumstances. Contemporary adventure stories stoked a lust for travel that he thought pointed him to the Navy in 1940, with no thought of the coming war. But a friend redirected him into the Marine Corps with the bit of misinformation that the Marines on ships boss the Sailors around. He warmly recalls his all business Parris Island boot camp instructors. Initial duty with the 5th Marines morphed into service in Merritt Red Mike Edsons embryonic raider battalion. He then found himself among a detachment sent from Edson to help establish Evans Carlsons raider battalion. Carlson and Rogal instantly achieved a mutual dislike. Hence, Rogal swiftly found himself in the newly forming A Company, 1st Battalion, 2d Marines. Now-corporal Rogal took charge of a Browning automatic rifle squad as his regiment loaded out for what proved to be Guadalcanal. Here Rogal airs a major
U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

76

motivation for his memoirs: a well-founded conviction that the Guadalcanal contribution of 2d Marines rarely gets its due. Yet even as his outfits champion, he is ever careful with the facts of both his and his regiments actual experiences. In smooth prose, Rogal candidly narrates the relatively peripheral role his starving battalion played on Florida and Tulagi islands prior to permanent transfer to Guadalcanal in November 1942. While his combat experiences are amply riveting in themselves, his narrative affords a thoughtful study on combat psychology and particularly combat leadership. He identifies the overarching aspiration of his comrades as survival with honor. It was the with honor that fueled the engine of effectiveness. His saddest day of service occurred when his first platoon leader proved a coward. In his initial encounter with face-toface combat, he killed five Japanese. This evokes no shame or sorrow, but likewise no sense of elation or victory. As his units roll dwindled alarmingly from combat losses and disease, Rogal found his assignments increasing in responsibility, but he acknowledges that [a]s a troop leader I felt obligated to exhibit unconcern and a savoir-faire I certainly didnt feel. He earned his highest personal decoration, the Navy and Marine Corps Medal, by rescuing a pilot from the sea. As to this, he confesses, I have always been apathetic about it, for Marines get paid to kill people, not save them. There followed a period of recuperation in New Zealand before Tarawa. Rogal, now a platoon sergeant, was wounded on the harrowing run into
N AVA L H I S T O R Y

the beach in an LVT (landing vehicle tracked) where one man was decapitated by a Japanese shell. On that famous beachhead replete with chaos he did his best at least to get his small command moving beyond the breakwater to engage the enemy. After a protracted hospitalization, Rogal returned to his unit. He narrates the campaigns on Saipan and Tinian in roughly the same space he gives Tarawa. Just as he sensed his relative luck was running out (he was wounded again on Saipan), Rogal benefited from the policy of returning men with two years of overseas service to the States. There he trained new Marines for combat and married the wonderful woman he met before shipping out to the Pacific. The service memoirs conclude with his postwar tour in China. After discharge, he went on to secure an undergraduate and law degree and worked for decades as a lawyer. Anyone who has read many personal accounts of World War II service will find this one truly outstanding, not just in its intrinsic interest but also in the care and craft of the author.
Mr. Frank is the author of the award-winning Guadalcanal: The Definitive Account of the Landmark Battle (Random House, 1990) and Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire (1999). He was a consultant for the HBO miniseries The Pacific and is working on a trilogy about the Asian-Pacific War from 1937 to 1945.

embryonic nation with little to recommend it and certainly unworthy of respect, and contrasts it with the young nation still finding its way but with the revolutionary fires still smoldering. The two views inevitably cause tensions and incidents, particularly as Britain is in a life-and-death struggle with France and will go to almost any length to ensure victory. And so the course is set for confrontation over Free Trade and Sailors Rights. Britain began the war with the hope of bringing it to an end through diplomacy. The United States began with the expectation of gaining Canada. Both sides were mistaken. Not surprisingly, the British turned to a strategy of blockade, with which they had had so much success against France. The coastline to be blockaded and its distance from home bases made that almost impossible and required much greater resources than had been anticipated. For the Americans, the incompetency of their generals aside, the unwelcome truth was that the Canadians werent interested in leaving the empire. Budiansky paints a number of interesting portraits of the reactions of political and military leaders on both sides and their responses to the realities of the situation.

Perilous Fight: Americas Intrepid War with Britain on the High Seas, 1812-1815
Stephen Budiansky. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010. 422 pp. Maps. Illus. Bib. Index. $35. Reviewed by Commander Tyrone G. Martin, U.S. Navy (Retired)

Stephen Budianskys book is on the leading edge of what undoubtedly will be a wave of works about the War of 1812. His opus may not be forgotten in the crowd, for he has taken an unusual approach: Sea battles are not its focus. Instead, he traces the course of the war through the politics and strategies of each side and the impact of events on them, as well as the logistical and financial problems, the changing public attitudes, and the personalities of those involved. The actual combat is a sideshow. Opening with a brief review of the combat origin of the U.S. Navy during the First Barbary War, the author takes up the British perception of America as a crude,

When the author turns to actual operations his treatment becomes sketchy, perhaps betraying a lack of understanding of the details of ship duels. With regard to the opening U.S. victory of the war over HMS Guerriere, he has chosen to repeat the story that appeared in most newspapers of the time, one that may have been good press but bears little relation to history. In retelling the Battle of Lake Erie,

APRIL 2011

77

the American brig Lawrence is said to have been fighting on both sides simultaneously, when she actually faced two foes on the same side. About half of the battles are ignored. And at no time is the point made that, among the American captains, none had fought a sea battle before. This is an easy book to read and so may gain a wide audience. Unfortunately, the author treats the facts rather cavalierlyas when he states the Royal Navy outnumbered the U.S. Navy 100 to 1 and so the phrase, a good read must be viewed with caution in terms of its being an authoritative text.
Commander Martin is a Golden Life member of the Naval Institute, the author of the prize-winning A Most Fortunate Ship (Naval Institute Press, 1997), and the 1997 Naval History Author of the Year.

The Battle for China: Essays on the Military History of the Sino-Japanese War of 1937-1945
Edited by Mark Peattie, Edward Drea, and Hans Van De Ven. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010. 614 pp. Maps. Illus. Index. Notes. $65 Reviewed by Major Robert S. Burrell, U.S. Marine Corps

The title of this book implies a degree of ambiguity concerning those who fought over the territorial integrity and cultural identity of China. The interplay of imperial Japan, nationalist Chinese, communist Chinese, Great Britain, Germany, the Soviet Union, France, and the United States from 1937 through 1945 creates a challenging labyrinth to navigate with accuracy and objectivity. Consequently, the editors have avoided attempting to define the facts of the matter and instead have offered essays from the perspectives of scholars from China, Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. Editors Mark Peattie, research fellow at the Hoover Institution; Edward Drea, former chief of the Research and Analysis Division of the U.S. Army Center of Military History; and Hans Van De Ven, professor of modern Chinese history at Cambridge University, are leading authorities on the Pacific war. The volumes 17 other contributors range from unknown doctoral candidates to historian heavyweights such as Ronald Spector. Despite this diversity, the result is a text firmly grounded in analyses of events from the perspective of military affairs. The book is organized in six parts: an overview; opposing armies organization,

training and equipment; initial hostilities (193738); a stalemate in strategies (193842); the Burma and Ichigo campaigns (194345); and conclusions. One innovative theme is the attention given to the challenges facing Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalist party Kuomintang (KMT). While not excusing its failures, the authors provide context for understanding the KMTs weak position in an agrarian society with undeveloped state organization facing a growing communist insurgency, tepid Allied support, and a vicious campaign of destruction carried out by an industrialized opponent. The deprivations the Chinese endured and the sacrifices they made over seven long years of some of the most brutal warfare in history does much to explain the KMTs precarious situation at wars end. Spector provides excellent context to these essays, placing the scholarship within the framework of the Pacific war, World War II, and the history of warfare. The book provides important insights into the Imperial Japanese Army. At a tactical and operational level, the SinoJapanese War validates Japans emphasis on offensive tactics to overcome the numeric superiority of its opponentssuccessful in this case against the Chinese rather than the Soviets, for whom it had prepared. Although in most cases materially superior to the Chinese, Japans ability to keep them off balance through limited offensives was perhaps the primary factor in surmounting overwhelming odds in manpower. The book also emphasizes the importance of the Imperial Japanese Navys operations in central China, particularly the considerable efforts of its naval air

forces in supporting the army and the vital consequence of controlling inland waterways for transportation and logistics. Naval forces proved critical in the amphibious landings at Shanghai. The book offers additional lessons on how Japans unclear strategy and inability to focus resources toward ending the war dragged the military deeper into a quagmire from which it could not emerge. The Battle for China is a ground- and air-centric study from which it is difficult to extract naval lessons. Japans ability to attain sea control between its main islands and the Chinese coast gave it great advantages in maneuverability and sustainment. In addition to controlling the major islands of Formosa (Taiwan) and Hainan, Japan seized every major seaport in China. Early in the war, the Imperial Japanese Navy initiated its 4th Fleet to maintain China Sea lines of communication and deny vital maritime logistics to the KMT. Because China could not oppose Japan with any significant sea denial, the authors may have chosen to avoid the subject of sea power. The Peoples Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), however, has not forgotten the naval lessons of the war, in which its coastline and waterways became the highways for imperial aggression. My only major criticism of The Battle for China stems from the inadequacy of its maps. Those unfamiliar with Chinese, Japanese, and Burmese geography will find the places described difficult to locate. For instance, the prominent province of Chahar in Inner Mongolia is not named on any of the 14 mapseven on the map of the Battle of Pingxingguan Pass, which took place in Chahar. The Burmese map shows fewer than half of the important locations discussed in the readings and no indication of the Burma Road, for which the forces were fighting. While I am not certain that Chinese or Japanese audiences will gravitate to this English work, and despite its targeting a small niche of Sino-Japanese War history enthusiasts in North America and Europe, nevertheless I cannot praise the editors enough for their effort in publishing this important book. The Battle for China is a rare treasure that will likely renew interest in this underdeveloped field. For those interested in the Pacific war or greater insight into modern Chinese history, I highly recommend it.
Major Burrell is author of the award-winning The Ghosts of Iwo Jima (Texas A&M Press, 2006) and a former history instructor at the U.S. Naval Academy.

78

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

Celebrating 100 Years of NAVAL AVIATION

HARDCOVER / 978-1-59114-879-1 / $37.95

ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF U.S. NAVY AIR POWER

Edited by Douglas V. Smith 978-1-59114-795-4 / Hardcover: $44.95
HARDCOVER / 978-1-59114-285-0 / $52.95

A monumental and eminently readable work from a group of distinguished historians in the eld of naval aviation. This is an absolutely essential addition to the personal libraries of military history readers and aviation enthusiasts alike. A book to be carefully read and then kept within reach. Admiral James L. Holloway III, USN (Ret.), former Chief of Naval Operations and author of Aircraft Carriers at War In time for the centennial of U.S. Navy aviation, this anthology by acknowledged authorities provides an excellent one-volume source on the subject. While aircraft carriers take pride of place, the chapters on maritime aviation and helicopters also are well worth reading. With detailed notes and sources, this book undoubtedly will remain a popular reference well beyond 2011. Barrett Tillman, author of Clash of the Carriers

HARDCOVER / 978-1-59114-516-5 / $49.95

Join the U.S. Naval Institute For Member Discounts on All Books!
visit us ONLINE at www.usni.org or CALL 800.233.8764

Museum Report
Splendor of Gods and Kings in Thailand
he letters exchanged in 186162 between Mongkut, king of Siam, and President Abraham Lincoln are among the most curious in the White House files. Mongkuts offer to ship breeding pairs of elephants, highly valued beasts of many uses in his kingdom, arrived in the United States in February 1861. A year later, Lincoln took a moment away from the Civil War to reply: I appreciate most highly Your Majestys tender of good offices in forwarding to this Government a stock from which a supply of elephants might be raised on our own soil. This Government would not hesitate to avail itself of so generous an offer if the object were one which could be made practically useful in the present condition of the United States. Our political jurisdiction, however, does not reach a latitude so low as to favor the multiplication of the elephant, and steam on land, as well as on water, has been our best and most efficient agent of transportation in internal commerce. (Dwight Young, Letters to the Oval Office). Although this diplomatic footnote isnt well known, many Americans are familiar with Mongkut, if only as his majesty was first portrayed by Yul Brynner on Broadway in The King and I (1951)a picture of the sovereign and his kingdom that today most Thais find patronizing and deeply offensive. A better idea of the sophistication and grandeur of the Thai royal house comes from a tour of the precinct of the royal palace in Bangkok, a fabulous, glittering assembly of roughly 40 buildings behind more than a mile of crenellated walls. With this splendid site as a distraction, relatively few tourists make it across the Chao Phraya River to the Royal Barges Museum near the Phra Pinklao Bridge. Thats too bad. The barges are beautiful, and more impressive than the generally smaller Ottoman sultans caiques displayed in Istanbul. Eight are intact, carved from great teak trunks, with gilded figureheads from the Hindu pantheon. Parts of several other barges are also on display. All are housed in an aircraft-hangar-like exhibit

By Andrew C. A. Jampoler

COURTESY OF THE AUTHOR

At one time constituting the kings navy, the royal Thai barges were a stunning, gilded display of power in the riverine nation. The largest, Subanahongsa (fanged-bird figurehead, second from right), carried the royal family.

hall enclosing the dock. The Thai barges once constituted the kings navy, a show of royal power afloat in a riverine nation. Sadly, the kingdoms antique barges were destroyed or damaged during World War II. The largest of the eight on display, the kings own hundred-year-old Subanahongsa, lies grandly behind a gilded figurehead of a swan-like hamsa, the mythical fanged, glaring bird associated with the Hindu god Brahma, the creator. The figurehead is meant to suggest the kings wisdom and grace. Afloat, the Subanahongsa is manned by a crew of 63, including 52 paddlers in red livery and seven pink-coated chanters. Two helmsmen steer. More imposing still is the ferocious, seven-headed serpent figurehead on the second-ranked and only slightly smaller barge, the Anantanagaraj. This carving is of a naga, one of a semi-divine race from under the sea. Two among the smaller (3040 paddlers) and newer escort barges that accompany the kings vessel feature a carving of Garuda, the fierce, snake-eating half-man, half-eagle important in Hindu and Buddhist mythology who is often associated with Vishnu, the preserver. Both figures straddle a dummy bow chaser gun. Lesser barges exhibit crowned monkeys,

tigers, and other beasts drawn from the same fantastic menagerie of pious belief. Another Garuda figurehead, this one off the bow of the barge HTMS Rattanakosin, is displayed at the Royal Thai Navy Museum in Samut Prakan, but relatively few tourists get there, either. This museum is south of the capital, across from the grounds of the Royal Thai Naval Academy (admission free; telephone 02 394 1997; open 08301530 daily, except public and national holidays). The easiest way to reach Bangkoks Royal Barges Museum is to rent a longtailed boat from any convenient place on a canal. Like many things in Thailand, both rental and taxi fare are negotiable.

Royal Barges Museum

Open daily 0900-1700 Arun Amarin Road Bangkok Noi Bangkok 10700 Tel: 02 424 0004 Admission 100 Thai baht (about $3)

Andrew Jampoler thanks David Thomas of Wanna Tours, Chiangmai, Thailand, for assistance. His fourth Naval Institute Press book is Horrible Shipwreck, published in 2010.

80

U N I T E D S TAT E S N AVA L I N S T I T U T E

USAA is proud to be the

Flagship Sponsor

of the United States Naval Institute

You know a good ally when you see one.

Only the USNI USAA Rewards World MasterCard honors your military service with: Direct financial contributions to the United States Naval Institute with every new account opened and each time you make a purchase with the card Rates as low as 9.9% APR on purchases, balance transfers and cash advances (this rate will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate)1 No annual fee USAA Rewards points on your purchases that you can redeem for your choice of cash, travel and more2 USNI MEMBERS:

Get 2,500
after your first purchase with your USNI USAA Rewards World MasterCard. 2

rewards points

We know what it means to serve. Let us serve you.

usaa.com/usnicc | 877-905-USNI (8764)

1

Offersubjecttoapproval.Asof9/1/2010,APRsare9.9%to25.9%,dependingonyourcredithistoryandotherfactors.APRswillvarywiththemarketbasedonthePrimeRate.Thereisatransactionfeeof3%oncashadvances($75maximumonbalancetransfersandconveniencechecks) and1%onforeigntransactions.2Rewardspointsterminateifaccountisclosed,delinquentorprogramends.Earn1pointforevery$1increditcardpurchases.Otherrestrictionsapply.USAARewardsProgramtermsandconditionswillbeprovidedwithyourcard.Useofthetermmember ormembershipdoesnotconveyanylegal,eligibilityorownershiprights.Availabilityrestrictionsapply.PurchaseofabankproductdoesnotestablisheligibilityforormembershipinUSAApropertyandcasualtyinsurancecompanies.USAASavingsBank,MemberFDIC.USNIreceives financialsupportfromUSAAforthissponsorship.2011USAA.XXXXXX-0211

We know what it means to

Naval Weapon Systems

Delivering the full range of mission solutions for every ship

Raytheons rich legacy of innovation makes it the most complete family of mission solutions for navies around the world. Only Raytheon can help customers stand the test of time through our proven Life Cycle Support initiatives. Our products, technology and people have made Raytheon the preferred provider of Naval Weapon Systems and the leader in ship defense solutions. Raytheon offers a solution to cover every need, whether it be ship self-defense on a jagged maritime frontier or fleet area defense.

INNovatIoN IN all domaINS Visit www.raytheon.com Keyword: NavalWS

2011 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.